Positive Nucleic Acid Amplification Test Research Articles

Laboratory data and broncho-alveolar lavage on Covid-19 patients with no intensive care unit admission: Correlation with chest CT features and clinical outcomes.

Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) is indicated in cases of uncertain diagnosis but high suspicion of Sars-Cov-2 infection allowing to collect material for microbiological culture to define the presence of coinfection or super-infection. This prospective study investigated the correlation between chest computed tomography (CT) findings, Covid-19 Reporting and Data System score, and clinical outcomes in Coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) patients who underwent BAL with the aim of predicting outcomes such as lung coinfection, respiratory failure, and hospitalization length based on chest CT abnormalities. Study population included 34 patients (range 38-90 years old; 20 males, 14 females) with a positive nucleic acid amplification test for Covid-19 infection, suitable BAL examination, and good quality chest CT scan in the absence of lung cancer history. Pulmonary coinfections were found in 20.6% of patients, predominantly caused by bacteria. Specific correlations were found between right middle lobe involvement and pulmonary co-infections. Severe lung injury (PaO2/FiO2 ratio of 100-200) was associated with substantial involvement of right middle, right upper, and left lower lobes. No significant correlation was found between chest CT findings and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein, procalcitonin) or hospitalization length of stay. Specific chest CT patterns, especially in right middle lobe, could serve as indicators for the presence of co-infections and disease severity in noncritically ill Covid-19 patients, aiding clinicians in timely interventions and personalized treatment strategies.

An update on the status of direct testing for Treponema pallidum subspecies pallidum for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis in Canada

Background: In Canada, the recent resurgence of infectious syphilis and rising rates of congenital syphilis have renewed interest in direct detection methods for the laboratory diagnosis of syphilis. The Canadian Public Health Laboratory Network (CPHLN) has previously published a series of guidelines for the diagnosis of syphilis in Canada, including the use of direct tests. In the decade since those guidelines were published, laboratory practice has changed. Methods: This systematized review combined a literature search (MEDLINE) of methods for direct detection of Treponema pallidum with an informal survey of current testing practices in Canadian public health laboratories. Results: Direct testing methods have favourable performance characteristics for detection of early syphilis and congenital cases. Although no government licensed commercial nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for syphilis is available in Canada, laboratory-developed tests have been implemented in multiple Canadian jurisdictions. Clinical specimens with the highest yield of positive NAAT results for syphilis include genital ulcers, skin lesions, and oral swabs from primary and secondary syphilis patients. For investigation of congenital syphilis, nasopharyngeal, placenta, umbilical cord, blood, and skin lesions are specimens of choice for direct detection of T. pallidum by NAAT. Conclusions: This update on the status of direct testing highlights the importance of NAAT for the detection of T. pallidum, the reduced role of microscopy-based methods, and the emergence of DNA and genome sequencing as tools for phylogenetic analysis and molecular epidemiology.

Machine learning to understand risks for severe COVID-19 outcomes: a retrospective cohort study of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, immunomodulatory medications, and comorbidities in a large US health-care system

In the context of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs), COVID-19 outcomes are incompletely understood and vary considerably depending on the patient population studied. We aimed to analyse severe COVID-19 outcomes and to investigate the effects of the pandemic time period and the risks associated with individual IMIDs, classes of immunomodulatory medications (IMMs), chronic comorbidities, and COVID-19 vaccination status. In this retrospective cohort study, clinical data were derived from the electronic health records of an integrated health-care system serving patients in 51 hospitals and 1085 clinics across seven US states (Providence St Joseph Health). Data were observed for patients (no age restriction) with one or more IMID and for unmatched controls without IMIDs. COVID-19 was identified with a positive nucleic acid amplification test result for SARS-CoV-2. Two timeframes were analysed: March 1, 2020-Dec 25, 2021 (pre-omicron period), and Dec 26, 2021-Aug 30, 2022 (omicron-predominant period). Primary outcomes were hospitalisation, mechanical ventilation, and mortality in patients with COVID-19. Factors, including IMID diagnoses, comorbidities, long-term use of IMMs, and COVID-19 vaccination status, were analysed with multivariable logistic regression (LR) and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). Of 2 167 656 patients tested for SARS-CoV-2, 290 855 (13·4%) had confirmed COVID-19: 15 397 (5·3%) patients with IMIDs and 275 458 (94·7%) without IMIDs. In the pre-omicron period, 169 993 (11·2%) of 1 517 295 people who were tested for COVID-19 tested positive, of whom 23 330 (13·7%) were hospitalised, 1072 (0·6%) received mechanical ventilation, and 5294 (3·1%) died. Compared with controls, patients with IMIDs and COVID-19 had higher rates of hospitalisation (1176 [14·6%] vs 22 154 [13·7%]; p=0·024) and mortality (314 [3·9%] vs 4980 [3·1%]; p<0·0001). In the omicron-predominant period, 120 862 (18·6%) of 650 361 patients tested positive for COVID-19, of whom 14 504 (12·0%) were hospitalised, 567 (0·5%) received mechanical ventilation, and 2001 (1·7%) died. Compared with controls, patients with IMIDs and COVID-19 (7327 [17·3%] of 42 249) had higher rates of hospitalisation (13 422 [11·8%] vs 1082 [14·8%]; p<0·0001) and mortality (1814 [1·6%] vs 187 [2·6%]; p<0·0001). Age was a risk factor for worse outcomes (adjusted odds ratio [OR] from 2·1 [95% CI 2·0-2·1]; p<0·0001 to 3·0 [2·9-3·0]; p<0·0001), whereas COVID-19 vaccination (from 0·082 [0·080-0·085]; p<0·0001 to 0·52 [0·50-0·53]; p<0·0001) and booster vaccination (from 2·1 [2·0-2·2]; p<0·0001 to 3·0 [2·9-3·0]; p<0·0001) status were associated with better outcomes. Seven chronic comorbidities were significant risk factors during both time periods for all three outcomes: atrial fibrillation, coronary artery disease, heart failure, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic liver disease, and cancer. Two IMIDs, asthma (adjusted OR from 0·33 [0·32-0·34]; p<0·0001 to 0·49 [0·48-0·51]; p<0·0001) and psoriasis (from 0·52 [0·48-0·56] to 0·80 [0·74-0·87]; p<0·0001), were associated with a reduced risk of severe outcomes. IMID diagnoses did not appear to be significant risk factors themselves, but results were limited by small sample size, and vasculitis had high feature importance in LR. IMMs did not appear to be significant, but less frequently used IMMs were limited by sample size. XGB outperformed LR, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for models across different time periods and outcomes ranging from 0·77 to 0·92. Our results suggest that age, chronic comorbidities, and not being fully vaccinated might be greater risk factors for severe COVID-19 outcomes in patients with IMIDs than the use of IMMs or the IMIDs themselves. Overall, there is a need to take age and comorbidities into consideration when developing COVID-19 guidelines for patients with IMIDs. Further research is needed for specific IMIDs (including IMID severity at the time of SARS-CoV-2 infection) and IMMs (considering dosage and timing before a patient's first COVID-19 infection). Pfizer, Novartis, Janssen, and the National Institutes of Health.

Trends in SARS-CoV-2 cycle threshold (Ct) values from nucleic acid testing predict the trajectory of COVID-19 waves

Forecasting COVID-19 waves helps with public health planning and resource allocation. Cycle threshold (Ct) values obtained from positive SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) results offer limited value for individual patient management, but real-time analysis of temporal trends of aggregated Ct values may provide helpful information to predict the trajectories of COVID-19 waves in the community. Ct value trends on 59,609 SARS-CoV-2 NAAT-positive results from 574,403 tests using a single testing assay system, between September 2021 and January 2023, were examined to monitor the trend of the proportion of positive NAAT with lower Ct values (≤28) in relation to changing COVID-19 case numbers over time. We applied regression with autoregressive integrated moving average errors modelling approach to study the relation between Ct values and case counts. We also developed an insight product to monitor the temporal trends with Ct values obtained from SARS-CoV-2 NAAT-positive results. In this study, the proportion of lower Ct values preceded by a range of 7-32 days the rising population COVID-19 testing rate reflecting onset of a COVID-19 wave. Monitoring population Ct values may assist in predicting increased disease activity.

Clinical Presentations and Treatment Outcomes of Mycoplasma genitalium Infections at a Large New York City Health Care System.

Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) is an emerging sexually transmitted infection. Treatment of MG is complicated by increasing resistance to primary treatment regimens, including macrolides and fluoroquinolones. Understanding the various clinical presentations and relative effectiveness of treatments for MG is crucial to optimizing care. Patients with a positive MG nucleic acid amplification test between July 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021, at a large health system in New York City were included in a retrospective cohort. Demographics, clinical presentations, coinfections, treatment, and follow-up microbiologic tests were obtained from the electronic medical record. Associations with microbiologic cure were evaluated in bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Five hundred two unique patients had a positive MG nucleic acid amplification test result during the study period. Male individuals presented predominantly with urethritis (117 of 187 [63%]) and female individuals with vaginal symptoms (142 of 315 [45%]). Among patients with follow-up testing who received a single antibiotic at the time of treatment, 43% (90 of 210) had persistent infection and 57% (120 of 210) had microbiologic cure. Eighty-two percent of patients treated with moxifloxacin had microbiologic cure compared with 41% of patients receiving azithromycin regimens ( P < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, treatment with moxifloxacin was associated with 4 times the odds of microbiologic cure relative to low-dose azithromycin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.73-10.13; P < 0.01). Clinical presentations of MG vary, with urethritis or vaginal symptoms in most cases. Among patients who received a single antibiotic, only treatment with moxifloxacin was significantly associated with microbiologic cure relative to low-dose azithromycin.

Prevalence of subclinical pulmonary tuberculosis and its association with HIV in household contacts of index tuberculosis patients in two South African provinces: a secondary, cross-sectional analysis of a cluster-randomised trial

BackgroundPeople with subclinical tuberculosis (TB) have microbiological evidence of disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but either do not have or do not report TB symptoms. The relationship between human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and subclinical TB is not yet well understood. We estimated the prevalence of subclinical pulmonary TB in household contacts of index TB patients in two South African provinces, and how this differed by HIV status.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional, secondary analysis of baseline data from the intervention arm of a household cluster randomised trial. Prevalence of subclinical TB was measured as the number of household contacts aged ≥ 5 years who had positive sputum TB microscopy, culture or nucleic acid amplification test (Xpert MTB/Rif or Xpert Ultra) results on a single sputum specimen and who did not report current cough, fever, weight loss or night sweats on direct questioning. Regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between HIV status and subclinical TB; adjusting for province, sex and age in household contacts; and HIV status in index patients.ResultsAmongst household contacts, microbiologically confirmed prevalent subclinical TB was over twice as common as symptomatic TB disease (48/2077, 2.3%, 95% CI 1.7–3.1% compared to 20/2077, 1.0%, 95% CI 0.6–1.5%). Subclinical TB prevalence was higher in people living with HIV (15/377, 4.0%, 95% CI 2.2–6.5%) compared to those who were HIV-negative (33/1696, 1.9%, 95% CI 1.3–2.7%; p = 0.018). In regression analysis, living with HIV (377/2077, 18.2%) was associated with a two-fold increase in prevalent subclinical TB with 95% confidence intervals consistent with no association through to a four-fold increase (adjusted OR 2.00, 95% CI 0.99–4.01, p = 0.052). Living with HIV was associated with a five-fold increase in prevalent symptomatic TB (adjusted OR 5.05, 95% CI 2.22–11.59, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMost (70.6%) pulmonary TB diagnosed in household contacts in this setting was subclinical. Living with HIV was likely associated with prevalent subclinical TB and was associated with prevalent symptomatic TB. Universal sputum testing with sensitive assays improves early TB diagnosis in subclinical household contacts.

Impact of time of culture specimen collection on the recovery of Neisseria gonorrhoeae after a positive nucleic acid amplification test

ObjectivesCulture of Neisseria gonorrhoeae remains essential for antimicrobial resistance (AMR) surveillance. We evaluated the effect of time of specimen collection on culture yield following a positive nucleic acid amplification test...

A-320 Validation of a Multi-Analyte Immunoassay for Distinguishing Bacterial Versus Viral Infections in a Pediatric Cohort

Abstract Background Clinical presentation of viral and bacterial infections or co-infections overlaps significantly. Pathogen identification is the gold standard for appropriate treatment. Recently, FDA approved a multivariate index test called MeMed-BV on the MedKey analyzer that distinguishes viral and bacterial infections based on a score derived from the differential expression of 3 host proteins. Here, we sought to validate the MeMed-BV immunoassay on the MedKey analyzer in our pediatric hospital, following guidelines from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods The analytical performance of MeMed-BV was evaluated by precision (intra- and inter-assay), accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) and interference studies. A retrospective cohort study (n = 60) was conducted to assess the diagnostic accuracy using plasma samples from pediatric patients with acute febrile illness who visited the emergency department of the Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, for whom a C-reactive protein test was requested. The following inclusion criteria were employed: 1) age ≤18 years during the clinical encounter; 2) peak fever &amp;gt;37.5°C with the onset of symptoms such as cough, sore throat, abdominal pain or nausea and vomiting; 3) duration of symptoms ≤7 days; and 4) a positive nucleic acid amplification test (for virus) or abnormal blood culture (for bacteria). Patients with 1) active malignancy, 2) congenital immunodeficiency, 3) active immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory therapy and 4) human immunodeficiency virus or hepatitis B/C virus infection were excluded. Clinical performance was evaluated by blinded adjudication from our emergency room physicians. Results MeMed-BV showed acceptable intra- and inter-assay precision with a range of &amp;lt;3 score units in both the high-score bacterial and the low-score viral samples. Accuracy studies revealed a sensitivity of 94% and specificity of 88% for identifying bacterial infections or co-infections. Our MeMed-BV results showed an excellent agreement (R = 0.998) with the manufacturer's laboratory data and compared well with ELISA studies. Gross hemolysis and icterus did not affect the assay, but gross lipemia showed a considerable bias in samples with a moderate likelihood of viral infection. Importantly, the MeMed-BV score performed better than routinely measured infection-related biomarkers like white blood cell counts, procalcitonin and C-reactive protein in classifying bacterial infections. Furthermore, it is important to note that the score but not individual levels of the biomarkers, should be used to discriminate between bacterial and viral infections. Conclusion MeMed-BV score on the MedKey analyzer demonstrated acceptable analytical performance and is reliable for distinguishing viral and bacterial infections or co-infections in pediatric patients. Future studies are warranted to examine the clinical utility, especially with respect to reducing the need for blood cultures and reducing the time to treatment for the patient.

Outcomes of COVID-19-Positive Donor Heart Transplantation in the United States.

Background Little is known regarding the impact of donor COVID-19 status on recipient outcomes after heart transplantation. In this study, we characterize outcomes of the first 110 heart transplants from organ donors positive for COVID-19 (COVID-19+) in the United States. Methods and Results Retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database was performed for single-organ adult heart transplants from January 2020 to March 2022. Donor COVID-19+ status was defined as a positive nucleic acid amplification, antigen, or other COVID-19 test within 7 days of transplant. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching used to adjust for differences between recipients of COVID-19+ and nonpositive donor hearts. Overall, 7251 heart transplants were included in analysis, with 110 using COVID-19+ donor hearts. Recipients of COVID-19+ allografts were younger (54 [interquartile range, 41-61]) versus 57 [46-64] years; P=0.02) but had similar rates of female sex and non-White race compared with those receiving allografts from negative donors. Nearest-neighbor propensity score matching resulted in 100 well-matched pairs of recipients of COVID-19+ versus nonpositive donor organs. The 2 matched groups had similar median lengths of stay (15 [11-23] days versus 15 [13-23] days; P=0.40), rates of graft failure (1% versus 0%; P=0.99), 30-day death (3% versus 3%; P=0.99), and 3-month survival (88% versus 94%; P=0.23) compared with recipients of nonpositive donors. No deaths occurred due to COVID-19 infection among the 8 (7%) total deceased recipients of COVID-19+ allografts to date. Conclusions Short-term outcomes of heart transplant recipients receiving COVID-19+ donor organs are reassuring. However, continued monitoring for long-term survival and potential complications are warranted.

Prevalence of and risk factors for microscopic and submicroscopic malaria infections in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Malaria infections during pregnancy can cause adverse birth outcomes, yet many infections are undetected by microscopy. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of submicroscopic malaria infections in pregnant women in Asia, the Americas, and Africa using aggregated and individual participant data (IPD). For this systematic review and meta-analysis, studies (published Jan 1, 1997 to Nov 10, 2021) with information on both microscopic and submicroscopic infections during pregnancy from Asia, the Americas, or Africa, identified in the Malaria-in-Pregnancy Library, were eligible. Studies (or subgroups or study groups) that selected participants on the basis of the presence of fever or a positive blood smear were excluded to avoid selection bias. We obtained IPD (when available) and aggregated data. Estimates of malaria transmission intensity and sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine resistance, matched by study location and year, were obtained using publicly available data. One-stage multivariable logit and multinomial models with random intercepts for study site were used in meta-analysis to assess prevalence of and risk factors for submicroscopic infections during pregnancy and at delivery. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42015027342. The search identified 87 eligible studies, 68 (78%) of which contributed to the analyses. Of these 68 studies, 45 (66%) studies contributed IPD (48 869 participants) and 23 (34%) studies contributed aggregated data (11 863 participants). During pregnancy, median prevalence estimates were 13·5% (range 0·0-55·9, 66 substudies) for submicroscopic and 8·0% (0·0-50·6, 66 substudies) for microscopic malaria. Among women with positive Plasmodium nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), the median proportion of submicroscopic infections was 58·7% (range 0·0-100); this proportion was highest in the Americas (73·3%, 0·0-100), followed by Asia (67·2%, 36·4-100) and Africa (56·5%, 20·5-97·7). In individual patient data analysis, compared with women with no malaria infections, those with submicroscopic infections were more likely to present with fever in Africa (adjusted odds ratio 1·32, 95% CI 1·02-1·72; p=0·038) but not in other regions. Among women with NAAT-positive infections in Asia and the Americas, Plasmodium vivax infections were more likely to be submicroscopic than Plasmodium falciparum infections (3·69, 2·45-5·54; p<0·0001). Risk factors for submicroscopic infections among women with NAAT-positive infections in Africa included older age (age ≥30 years), multigravidity, and no HIV infection. During pregnancy, submicroscopic infections are more common than microscopic infections and are associated with fever in Africa. Malaria control in pregnancy should target both microscopic and submicroscopic infections. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation through the Worldwide Antimalarial Resistance Network.

Patterns in Use and Transplant Outcomes Among Adult Recipients of Kidneys From Deceased Donors With COVID-19

While the COVID-19 pandemic enters a new phase and the proportion of individuals with a previous COVID-19 diagnosis increases, the national patterns in kidney use and medium-term kidney transplant (KT) outcomes among patients receiving kidneys from active or resolved COVID-19-positive donors remain unknown. To evaluate the patterns in kidney use and KT outcomes among adult recipients of kidneys from deceased donors with active or resolved COVID-19. This retrospective cohort study was conducted using national US transplant registry data from 35 851 deceased donors (71 334 kidneys) and 45 912 adult patients who received KTs from March 1, 2020, to March 30, 2023. The exposure was donor SARS-CoV-2 nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) results, with positive NAT results within 7 days before procurement defined as active COVID-19 and positive NAT results 1 week (>7 days) before procurement defined as resolved COVID-19. Primary outcomes were kidney nonuse, all-cause kidney graft failure, and all-cause patient death. Secondary outcomes were acute rejection (ie, rejection in the first 6 months after KT), transplant hospitalization length of stay (LOS), and delayed graft function (DGF). Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed for kidney nonuse, rejection, and DGF; multivariable linear regression analyses were performed for LOS; and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed for graft failure and all-cause death. All models were adjusted for inverse probability treatment weighting. Among 35 851 deceased donors, the mean (SD) age was 42.5 (15.3) years; 22 319 (62.3%) were men and 23 992 (66.9%) were White. Among 45 912 recipients, the mean (SD) age was 54.3 (13.2) years; 27 952 (60.9%) were men and 15 349 (33.4%) were Black. The likelihood of nonuse of kidneys from active or resolved COVID-19-positive donors decreased over time. Overall, kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.55; 95% CI, 1.38-1.76) and kidneys from resolved COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.16-1.48) had a higher likelihood of nonuse compared with kidneys from COVID-19-negative donors. From 2020 to 2022, kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (2020: AOR, 11.26 [95% CI, 2.29-55.38]; 2021: AOR, 2.09 [95% CI, 1.58-2.79]; 2022: AOR, 1.47 [95% CI, 1.28-1.70]) had a higher likelihood of nonuse compared with kidneys from donors without COVID-19. Kidneys from resolved COVID-19-positive donors had a higher likelihood of nonuse in 2020 (AOR, 3.87; 95% CI, 1.26-11.90) and 2021 (AOR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.54-2.45) but not in 2022 (AOR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.28). In 2023, kidneys from both active COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.75-1.63) and resolved COVID-19-positive donors (AOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.80-1.73) were not associated with higher odds of nonuse. No higher risk of graft failure or death was found in patients receiving kidneys from active COVID-19-positive donors (graft failure: adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.78-1.37]; patient death: AHR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.84-1.66]) or resolved COVID-19-positive donors (graft failure: AHR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.88-1.39]; patient death: AHR, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.70-1.28]). Donor COVID-19 positivity was not associated with longer LOS, higher risk of acute rejection, or higher risk of DGF. In this cohort study, the likelihood of nonuse of kidneys from COVID-19-positive donors decreased over time, and donor COVID-19 positivity was not associated with worse KT outcomes within 2 years after transplant. These findings suggest that the use of kidneys from donors with active or resolved COVID-19 is safe in the medium term; further research is needed to assess longer-term transplant outcomes.

Diagnostic yield of urine lipoarabinomannan and sputum tuberculosis tests in people living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data

Sputum is the most widely used sample to diagnose active tuberculosis, but many people living with HIV are unable to produce sputum. Urine, in contrast, is readily available. We hypothesised that sample availability influences the diagnostic yield of various tuberculosis tests. In this systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data, we compared the diagnostic yield of point-of-care urine-based lipoarabinomannan tests with that of sputum-based nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) and sputum smear microscopy (SSM). We used microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis based on positive culture or NAAT from any body site as the denominator and accounted for sample provision. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, African Journals Online, and clinicaltrials.gov from database inception to Feb 24, 2022 for randomised controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, and cohort studies that assessed urine lipoarabinomannan point-of-care tests and sputum NAATs for active tuberculosis detection in participants irrespective of tuberculosis symptoms, HIV status, CD4 cell count, or study setting. We excluded studies in which recruitment was not consecutive, systematic, or random; provision of sputum or urine was an inclusion criterion; less than 30 participants were diagnosed with tuberculosis; early research assays without clearly defined cutoffs were tested; and humans were not studied. We extracted study-level data, and authors of eligible studies were invited to contribute deidentified individual participant data. The main outcomes were the tuberculosis diagnostic yields of urine lipoarabinomannan tests, sputum NAATs, and SSM. Diagnostic yields were predicted using Bayesian random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021230337. We identified 844 records, from which 20 datasets and 10 202 participants (4561 [45%] male participants and 5641 [55%] female participants) were included in the meta-analysis. All studies assessed sputum Xpert (MTB/RIF or Ultra, Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) and urine Alere Determine TB LAM (AlereLAM, Abbott, Chicago, IL, USA) in people living with HIV aged 15 years or older. Nearly all (9957 [98%] of 10 202) participants provided urine, and 82% (8360 of 10 202) provided sputum within 2 days. In studies that enrolled unselected inpatients irrespective of tuberculosis symptoms, only 54% (1084 of 1993) of participants provided sputum, whereas 99% (1966 of 1993) provided urine. Diagnostic yield was 41% (95% credible interval [CrI] 15-66) for AlereLAM, 61% (95% Crl 25-88) for Xpert, and 32% (95% Crl 10-55) for SSM. Heterogeneity existed across studies in the diagnostic yield, influenced by CD4 cell count, tuberculosis symptoms, and clinical setting. In predefined subgroup analyses, all tests had higher yields in symptomatic participants, and AlereLAM yield was higher in those with low CD4 counts and inpatients. AlereLAM and Xpert yields were similar among inpatients in studies enrolling unselected participants who were not assessed for tuberculosis symptoms (51% vs 47%). AlereLAM and Xpert together had a yield of 71% in unselected inpatients, supporting the implementation of combined testing strategies. AlereLAM, with its rapid turnaround time and simplicity, should be prioritised to inform tuberculosis therapy among inpatients who are HIV-positive, regardless of symptoms or CD4 cell count. The yield of sputum-based tuberculosis tests is undermined by people living with HIV who cannot produce sputum, whereas nearly all participants are able to provide urine. The strengths of this meta-analysis are its large size, the carefully harmonised denominator, and the use of Bayesian random-effects and mixed-effects models to predict yields; however, data were geographically restricted, clinically diagnosed tuberculosis was not considered in the denominator, and little information exists on strategies for obtaining sputum samples. FIND, the Global Alliance for Diagnostics.

Cutaneous Tuberculosis in Heart Transplant

Tuberculosis is a disease with a significant global burden in terms of morbidity and mortality. It usually presents as a pulmonary disease but can occasionally have extrapulmonary presentations. Immunosuppressed people are at an increased risk of tuberculosis and more frequently have atypical manifestations of the disease. Cutaneous involvement is estimated to occur in only 2% of extrapulmonary presentations. We report a case of a heart transplant recipient with disseminated tuberculosis who initially presented with cutaneous manifestations in the form of multiple abscesses that were mistaken for a community-acquired bacterial infection. The diagnosis was made after positive nucleic acid amplification testing and cultures for Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the drainage of the abscesses. After initiating antituberculous treatment, the patient had 2 instances of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. A combination of diminished immunosuppression due to discontinuation of mycophenolate mofetil in the setting of acute infection, rifampin drug interactions with cyclosporine, and the beginning of treatment of tuberculosis all contributed to this paradoxical worsening. The patient responded favorably to increased glucocorticoid therapy and showed no signs of treatment failure after 6 months of antituberculous therapy.

Characterization of COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients in Three United States Electronic Health Record Databases

COVID-19 infections have contributed to substantial increases in hospitalizations. This study describes demographics, baseline clinical characteristics and treatments, and clinical outcomes among U.S. patients admitted to hospitals with COVID-19 during the prevaccine phase of the pandemic. A total of 20,446 hospitalized patients with a positive COVID-19 nucleic acid amplification test were identified from three large electronic health record databases during 5 February-30 November 2020 (Academic Health System: n = 4504; Explorys; n = 7492; OneFlorida: n = 8450). Over 90% of patients were ≥30 years of age, with an even distribution between sexes. At least one comorbidity was recorded in 84.6-96.1% of patients; cardiovascular and respiratory conditions (28.8-50.3%) and diabetes (25.6-44.4%) were most common. Anticoagulants were the most frequently reported medications on or up to 28 days after admission (44.5-81.7%). Remdesivir was administered to 14.1-24.6% of patients and increased over time. Patients exhibited higher COVID-19 severity 14 days following admission than the 14 days prior to and on admission. The length of in-patient hospital stay ranged from a median of 4 to 6 days, and over 85% of patients were discharged alive. These results promote understanding of the clinical characteristics and hospital-resource utilization associated with hospitalized COVID-19 over time.

Clinical outcomes for Clostridioides difficile associated diarrhea in inflammatory bowel disease patients versus non-IBD population: A retrospective cohort study.

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have a higher incidence of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Previous studies have demonstrated negative clinical outcomes in IBD patients with CDI compared to patients without CDI. The clinical presentation of CDI is indistinguishable from IBD exacerbation, thus posing a frequent clinical dilemma on the role of Clostridioides infection in the testing, diagnosis, and treatment of these patients. To compare clinical outcomes of CDI in patients with IBD to those without IBD. Retrospective cohort of adult patients admitted to Rabin Medical Center Israel between the years 2014 and 2020 with a concurrent diagnosis of IBD and CDI. Matching 1:2 was performed between the IBD patients and the non-IBD population with respect to age and sex. Sixty-seven patients with IBD and 134 patients without IBD were included in the study. The groups' median age was 40.6 (interquartile range [IQR] of 29.8-68.9), with 45.8% male and 54.2% female. The non-IBD group had a higher Charlson score with 2 (IQR 0; 5) versus 0 (IQR 0; 4) in the IBD group (P value <.01). Patients with IBD had more exposure to systemic antibiotics, 71.1% versus 26.3% (P value <.01). In a multivariable analysis we found no difference in 90-day mortality and rate of relapse between the 2 study groups with an odds ratio of 1.709 (95% confidence interval 0.321-9.905) and odds ratio of 0.209 (95% confidence interval 0.055-1.513) respectively. In our cohort patients with IBD who present with diarrhea and concomitant CDI have similar rates of relapse and mortality compared with patients without IBD.

Real-world evaluation of a two-step testing algorithm for Clostridioides difficile infection.

During the 4 years after implementation of the 2-step Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) testing algorithm, 70% to 78% of patients with suspected CDI and a positive nucleic acid amplification test but a negative toxin test (NAAT+/TOX-) received CDI treatment. Overall, 73% of NAAT+/TOX- patients were classified as having probable or possible CDI.

384. Assessing the Multistep Approach for Clostridioides difficile Infection Diagnosis

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a spore-forming anaerobic Gram-positive bacillus and the leading cause of nosocomial infectious diarrhea. 2017 IDSA/SHEA C. difficile guidelines recommend a multistep algorithm approach for CDI diagnosis. This algorithm entails stool testing via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and C. difficile toxins A/B (Tox). Discordant samples are arbitrated by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) for tcdB gene. GDH EIA has sensitivities &amp;gt;90%, while Tox EIA has sensitivities ranging from 50-90%. We aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of GDH and Tox EIA using the multistep algorithm as the gold standard. Methods We performed a secondary analysis of an inpatient dataset collected in a tertiary community health system in the Southern US, including 9-months of the incident population from 2019 to 2020. All adults ≥ 18-years old from Princeton Baptist Medical Center (Birmingham, AL) tested for C. difficile were included. Alere TechLab C. difficile Quik Chek Complete® was used to determine GDH and Tox EIA, and Alethia C. difficile DNA Amplification Assay®, a NAAT, for discordant samples. CDI case was defined as positivity for Tox and GDH, or positivity of either Tox or GDH in addition to positive NAAT. Retesting within the same admission was allowed. Results Overall, 288 tests were performed. Concordant positivity for GDH &amp; Tox was found in 29 (10.1%) tests; concordant negativity in 226 (78.5%). Discordant positivity for GDH or Tox was observed in 33 (11.5%) tests; all were tested with NAAT. Only 1 of 33 (3.03%) discordant tests was GDH negative &amp; Tox positive, which had a positive NAAT. The remaining 32 (96.97%) discordant tests were GDH positive and Tox negative, of which 18 (56.3%) were positive for NAAT (Table 1). Performance characteristics for the above tests were calculated (Table 2). Table 1:Clostridioides difficile infection case distributions per GDH and ToxinTable 2:Test performance characteristics Conclusion Taking the multistep algorithm as a gold standard, the performance characteristics of GDH and Tox are concordant to previous descriptions in the literature, with GDH being highly sensitive and Tox being highly specific. A diagnostic algorithm lacking GDH and NAAT would miss over one-third of CDI cases. A diagnostic algorithm lacking Tox and NAAT could potentially overdiagnose about one-fifth of tested patients. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

385. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic First Wave on Clostridioides difficile Infection

Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of nosocomial diarrhea and a costly burden on the healthcare system. The COVID-19 pandemic brought enhanced infection control measures that could hypothetically decrease CDI transmission. Nonetheless, diarrhea secondary to COVID-19 and increased usage of broad-spectrum antibiotics could potentially increase testing for or frequency of CDI. We aimed to assess variations in CDI testing and frequency during the first surge of the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary community medical center in the Southern United States. Methods Records from adult patients were retrospectively reviewed at Princeton Baptist Medical Center, Birmingham, AL. Three groups spanning equal time periods were created based on the CDC COVID-19 rate curves for Alabama: PPG (pre-pandemic, 03/01/2020 to 05/31/2020), PG (pandemic, 06/01/2020 to 08/31/2020), and SCG (seasonal control, 06/01/2019 to 08/31/2019). We included patients ≥ 18 years old and excluded readmissions and follow-up visits. We determined the frequency, testing rates, and positivity rates for CDI in each group to assess their differences. Also, we measured the rate of coinfection between C. difficile and SARS-CoV-2. CDI cases were defined as positive toxin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) and glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH), or positivity of either in addition to positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT). Differences in frequencies and rates across groups were compared with Fisher exact test. Results Overall, 7,252 hospitalized patients and 29,671 outpatients were included (Figure 1). No outpatient CDI cases were detected. Outpatient testing rates were: PPG 3 (0.05%), PG 4 (0.05%), and SCG 9 (0.06%). Among inpatients, 3,912 (53.9%) were female with a mean ± SD age of 61.2 ± 17.5 years. Overall, CDI frequency, testing rates, and positivity rates did not vary significantly among all groups (Table 1). Among those tested, the only case of C.difficile/SARS-CoV-2 coinfection corresponded to PPG. Figure 1:Patient distributionTable 1:Frequency of CDI and COVID-19 infection in inpatients Conclusion There were no statistically significant differences in CDI frequency, or positivity rate between the pre-pandemic, pandemic, and seasonal control groups for inpatients. No CDI cases were detected in outpatients. This is likely due to a low testing rate in our population. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

2108. Evaluation of Bezlotoxumab for the Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection in Patients Living With Cancer at a Large Comprehensive Cancer Center

Abstract Background Bezlotoxumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that binds and neutralizes Clostridioides difficile toxin B. Administration of bezlotoxumab along with standard of care antibiotic (SoC) treatment of C. difficile infections (CDI) is associated with lower rates of CDI recurrence (rCDI). We aimed to determine the real-world incidence of rCDI in patients with cancer within 12 weeks after receiving bezlotoxumab. Methods This is a retrospective, single-center, descriptive study of patients with cancer that received bezlotoxumab from Jan 2018 through Oct 2021 at a large cancer center. rCDI was defined as a clinical illness associated with a positive stool nucleic acid amplification test with or without a confirmatory toxin assay for which CDI SoC was prescribed. Results A total of 131 patients were included in the study (median age of 63 years, 47% male, 77% Caucasian, 21% ICU admission), with 31% having one or more CDI episodes ≤ 6 months prior to receiving bezlotoxumab. The most common primary cancer type was leukemia (36%) followed by a solid organ tumor (35%), lymphoma (21%), and myeloma (8%). Cytotoxic chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors were prescribed within 6 months in 78% of cases and 60% of patients were given antibiotics not related to CDI. Fidaxomicin was most frequently administered as SoC (56%), followed by oral vancomycin (44%) with or without intravenous metronidazole. Within 12 weeks following bezlotoxumab treatment, rCDI occurred in 14 (10.7%, 95% Cl 5.4% to 16.0%) patients. Using univariate analysis, patients with rCDI were more likely to have received levofloxacin before and during bezlotoxumab treatment (86% versus 47%; OR 6.76, 95% CI 1.45 - 31.56, p=0.009). Conclusion In this real-world study, the rate of rCDI following use of bezlotoxumab during SoC antibiotics was comparable to that seen in clinical trials. Use of levofloxacin as prophylaxis for prolonged neutropenia in hematologic malignancies was associated with significantly higher rates of rCDI in patients that received bezlotoxumab. Our study suggests that neutropenia and antibiotic induced dysbiosis are risk factors for rCDI despite bezlotoxumab administration. Disclosures Pablo C. Okhuysen, MD, AstraZeneca: Stocks/Bonds|Beam Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds|Biontech: Stocks/Bonds|Deinove: Grant/Research Support|Ferring: Advisor/Consultant|Glaxo Smith Kleine: Stocks/Bonds|Johnson and Johnson: Stocks/Bonds|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Merck Sharp &amp; Dohme Corp: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: Stocks/Bonds|Napo Pharmaceuticals: Advisor/Consultant|Napo Pharmaceuticals: Grant/Research Support|Novavax: Stocks/Bonds|Pfizer: Stocks/Bonds|Summit: Advisor/Consultant|Summit: Grant/Research Support.

Prevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections in Saudi Arabia blood donors: A nationwide, cross-sectional study.

To establish a nationwide epidemiological profile of transfusion-transmittable infection (TTI) markers among seemingly healthy blood donors to update policies required to ensure blood safety. A nationwide, cross-sectional study was designed to examine donor demographics and TTI prevalence during 2020 using data provided by the Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia. Collectively, a total of 375,218 whole blood units were donated, of which 32,758 (8.7%) were excluded due to TTI-related risk. The exclusion was based on a positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAT) or seroreactivity to hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human T-cell lymphotropic virus (HTLV-I/II), syphilis, or malaria. Notably, the central (37.6%) and southern (33%) regions were the epicenters of TTI-reactive blood donors. Hepatitis B virus markers accounted for 85.7% and were the overall most prevalent of TTI-positive donations, followed by HCV at 5.9% and syphilis at 5.6%. In particular, anti-HBc and HBsAg were most prevalent in the south, while HBV NAT was highest in the center. Hepatitis B virus, HCV, and syphilis carry the greatest risk of TTI in Saudi Arabia. Including HBsAg screening is a necessary precautious measure to maintain blood safety.