Positive Newborn Screening Results Research Articles

Retrospective Review of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Isovaleric Acidemia and Development of a Strategy to Improve the Efficacy of Newborn Screening in the UK.

Since the UK commenced newborn screening for isovaleric acidemia in 2015, changes in prescribing have increased the incidence of false positive (FP) results due to pivaloylcarnitine. A review of screening results between 2015 and 2022 identified 24 true positive (TP) and 84 FP cases, with pivalate interference confirmed in 76/84. Initial C5 carnitine (C5C) did not discriminate between FP and TP with median (range) C5C of 2.9 (2.0-9.6) and 4.0 (1.8->70) µmol/L, respectively, and neither did Precision Newborn Screening via Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR), which identified only 1/47 FP cases. However, among the TP cases, disease severity showed a correlation with initial C5C in 'asymptomatic' individuals (n = 17), demonstrating a median (range) C5C of 3.0 (1.8-7.1) whilst 'clinically affected' patients (n = 7), showed a median (range) C5C of 13.9 (7.7-70) µmol/L. These findings allowed the introduction of dual cut-off values into the screening algorithm to reduce the incidence of FPs, with initial C5C results ≥ 5 µmol/L triggering urgent referral, and those >2.0 and <5.0 µmol/L prompting second-tier C5-isobar testing. This will avoid delayed referral in babies at particular risk whilst reducing the FP rate for the remainder.

Accurate determination of Biotinidase activity in serum by HPLC and its utilization as second tier test for the confirmation of initial positive newborn screening results

Diagnosis of Biotinidase deficiency (BTD) is extremely important to avoid several neurodevelopmental problems in early childhood. Colorimetric and fluorometric methods lack specificity and selectivity due to several interferences resulting in a high number of false positive results. We developed an HPLC method for BTD activity in serum with fluorescent detection. In colorimetric assays, biotinidase attacks the amide linkage of the artificial substrate biotinidyl-4-aminobenzoic acid (B-PABA) and releases p-aminobenzoic acid (PABA), which is converted to a purple dye by diazotization reaction. The newly developed method injects the reaction mixture directly into the HPLC column and quantifies using a six-point calibration curve without coupling and diazotization reaction. The method is linear over the 5–1000 μmol/L range. The detection and quantitation limits were 2.5 μmol/L and 5.0 μmol/L, respectively. When compared with colorimetric assay, the correlation coefficient (R2) was 0.9963. The within-assay and between-assay precision was <10.0% for four levels of quality control samples. No significant variation in BTD activity was detected due to hemolysis, icteric, and lipemic samples. The newly developed method eliminates the potential interference due to the presence of aromatic amines and significantly reduces the false positive results observed with the colorimetric method. It is simple, specific, sensitive, faster in sample preparation, and requires a small sample volume. The newly developed HPLC method was used in our laboratory as a secondary tier test for initial positive BTD samples from newborn screening programs. To our knowledge, no similar HPLC method has been reported to date.

Critical diseases in neonates after discharge home from birth hospital: A retrospective study from a tertiary hospital in Japan

IntroductionTo establish actionable neonatal screening during the first month of life, we investigated critical diseases in seemingly healthy newborns discharged from birth hospitals. MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled previously healthy full-term infants who visited our hospital, a tertiary hospital in Japan, from home between 5 and 28 days after birth from 2009 to 2018. Infants with known perinatal or congenital diseases, positive newborn screening results, or accidental injuries were excluded. Data were collected from electronic medical records, including principal diagnosis, clinical details, and prognosis at 18 months of age. ResultsNinety-seven (58 %) of 168 eligible neonates were admitted to the hospital, and 71 (42 %) were not. The median admission rate in patients with disease onset at ≤14 days after birth (80 %) was significantly higher than that in patients with disease onset at ≥15 days (42 %). Among 45 patients who received intensive medical care, 5 died and 10 developed neurodevelopmental sequelae. Four of 5 patients died by 100 days. Among 25 diseases treated in intensive care unit, 17 (68 %) diseases had a prevalence of <1 per 2000 live births. The commonly used diagnostic methods were imaging (n = 58, 35 %) and physical examination (n = 34, 20 %). ConclusionCritical diseases due to rare and heterogeneous causes in ostensibly healthy newborns occurred predominantly in the first two weeks of life. Optimal newborn screening and health check-up protocols may benefit from the wide spectrum of life-threatening diseases occurring in home after birth.

Collaborative evaluation study on 18 candidate diseases for newborn screening in 1.77 million samples.

Analytical and therapeutic innovations led to a continuous but variable extension of newborn screening (NBS) programmes worldwide. Every extension requires a careful evaluation of feasibility, diagnostic (process) quality and possible health benefits to balance benefits and limitations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of 18 candidate diseases for inclusion in NBS programmes. Utilising tandem mass spectrometry as well as establishing specific diagnostic pathways with second-tier analyses, three German NBS centres designed and conducted an evaluation study for 18 candidate diseases, all of them inherited metabolic diseases. In total, 1 777 264 NBS samples were analysed. Overall, 441 positive NBS results were reported resulting in 68 confirmed diagnoses, 373 false-positive cases and an estimated cumulative prevalence of approximately 1 in 26 000 newborns. The positive predictive value ranged from 0.07 (carnitine transporter defect) to 0.67 (HMG-CoA lyase deficiency). Three individuals were missed and 14 individuals (21%) developed symptoms before the positive NBS results were reported. The majority of tested candidate diseases were found to be suitable for inclusion in NBS programmes, while multiple acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, isolated methylmalonic acidurias, propionic acidemia and malonyl-CoA decarboxylase deficiency showed some and carnitine transporter defect significant limitations. Evaluation studies are an important tool to assess the potential benefits and limitations of expanding NBS programmes to new diseases.

Isovaleric aciduria identified by newborn screening: Strategies to predict disease severity and stratify treatment.

Newborn screening (NBS) allows early identification of individuals with rare disease, such as isovaleric aciduria (IVA). Reliable early prediction of disease severity of positively screened individuals with IVA is needed to guide therapeutic decision, prevent life-threatening neonatal disease manifestation in classic IVA and over-medicalization in attenuated IVA that may remain asymptomatic. We analyzed 84 individuals (median age at last study visit 8.5 years) with confirmed IVA identified by NBS between 1998 and 2018 who participated in the national, observational, multicenter study. Screening results, additional metabolic parameters, genotypes, and clinical phenotypic data were included. Individuals with metabolic decompensation showed a higher median isovalerylcarnitine (C5) concentration in the first NBS sample (10.6 vs. 2.7 μmol/L; p < 0.0001) and initial urinary isovalerylglycine concentration (1750 vs. 180 mmol/mol creatinine; p = 0.0003) than those who remained asymptomatic. C5 was in trend inversely correlated with full IQ (R = -0.255; slope = -0.869; p = 0.0870) and was lower for the "attenuated" variants compared to classic genotypes [median (IQR; range): 2.6 μmol/L (2.1-4.0; 0.7-6.4) versus 10.3 μmol/L (7.4-13.1; 4.3-21.7); N = 73]. In-silico prediction scores (M-CAP, MetaSVM, and MetaLR) correlated highly with isovalerylglycine and ratios of C5 to free carnitine and acetylcarnitine, but not sufficiently with clinical endpoints. The results of the first NBS sample and biochemical confirmatory testing are reliable early predictors of the clinical course of IVA, facilitating case definition (attenuated versus classic IVA). Prediction of attenuated IVA is supported by the genotype. On this basis, a reasonable algorithm has been established for neonates with a positive NBS result for IVA, with the aim of providing the necessary treatment immediately, but whenever possible, adjusting the treatment to the individual severity of the disease.

Analysis of online parenting community posts on expanded newborn screening for metabolic disorders using topic modeling: a quantitative content analysis.

As more newborns have received expanded newborn screening (NBS) for metabolic disorders, the overall number of false-positive results has increased. The purpose of this study was to explore the psychological impacts experienced by mothers related to the NBS process. An online parenting community in Korea was selected, and questions regarding NBS were collected using web crawling for the period from October 2018 to August 2021. In total, 634 posts were analyzed. The collected unstructured text data were preprocessed, and keyword analysis, topic modeling, and visualization were performed. Of 1,057 words extracted from posts, the top keyword based on 'term frequency-inverse document frequency' values was "hypothyroidism," followed by "discharge," "close examination," "thyroid-stimulating hormone levels," and "jaundice." The top keyword based on the simple frequency of appearance was "XXX hospital," followed by "close examination," "discharge," "breastfeeding," "hypothyroidism," and "professor." As a result of LDA topic modeling, posts related to inborn errors of metabolism (IEMs) were classified into four main themes: "confirmatory tests of IEMs," "mother and newborn with thyroid function problems," "retests of IEMs," and "feeding related to IEMs." Mothers experienced substantial frustration, stress, and anxiety when they received positive NBS results. The online parenting community played an important role in acquiring and sharing information, as well as psychological support related to NBS in newborn mothers. Nurses can use this study's findings to develop timely and evidence-based information for parents whose children receive positive NBS results to reduce the negative psychological impact.

Evaluation of specificity and sensitivity of IRT/IRT protocol in the cystic fibrosis newborn screening program: 6-year experience of three tertiary centers.

We aimed to evaluate cutoff values of immunoreactive trypsinogen (IRT)/IRT and determine relationship between IRT values and clinical characteristics of children with cystic fibrosis (CF). This study is cross-sectional study. Data of children with positive newborn screening (NBS) between 2015 and 2021 were evaluated in three pediatric pulmonology centers. Age at admission, sex, gestational age, presence of history of meconium ileus, parental consanguinity, sibling with CF, and doll-like face appearance, first and second IRT values, sweat chloride test, fecal elastase, fecal fat, biochemistry results, and age at CF diagnosis were recorded. Sensitivity and specificity of IRT cutoff values were evaluated. Of 815 children with positive NBS, 58 (7.1%) children were diagnosed with CF. Median values of first and second IRT were 157.2 (103.7-247.6) and 113.0 (84.0-201.5) μg/L. IRT values used in current protocol, sensitivity was determined as 96.6%, specificity as 17.2% for first IRT, and 96.6% sensitivity, 20.5% specificity for second IRT. Positive predictive value (PPV) was determined as 7.1%. When cutoff value for first IRT was estimated as 116.7μg/L, sensitivity was 69.0% and specificity was 69.6%, and when cutoff value was set to 88.7μg/L for second IRT, sensitivity was 69.0% and specificity was 69.0%. Area under curve was 0.757 for first and 0.763 for second IRT (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). PPV was calculated as 4.3%. Conclusion: Although sensitivity of CF NBS is high in our country, its PPV is significantly lower than expected from CF NBS programs. False-positive NBS results could have been overcome by revising NBS strategy. What is Known: • Although immunoreactive trypsinogen elevation is a sensitive test used in cystic fibrosis newborn screening, its specificity is low. • In countries although different algorithms are used, all strategies begin with the measurement of immunoreactive trypsinogen in dried blood spots. What is New: • In our study, it was shown that use of the IRT/IRT protocol for cystic fibrosis newborn screening is not sufficient for the cut-off values determined by the high number of patients. • Newborn screening strategy should be reviewed to reduce false positive newborn screening results.

Variability in Notification of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Sickle Cell Trait across States in the US

Background: Newborn screening (NBS) for sickle cell disease has been universal in all 50 states since 2006, with the first state having adopted NBS in 1975. While identification of sickle cell trait (SCT) status is not the primary goal of this screening, SCT is unique among carrier states due to its reproductive and clinical implications. However, because SCT is a byproduct of newborn screening rather than a primary goal, funding availability and notification practices differs widely between states. We performed a survey of newborn screening programs in states and US territories to identify differences in SCT notification practices. Methods: We developed a survey in Qualtrics and delivered it via email to NBS program coordinators in all 50 states, the District of Columbia (DC), and 2 US territories in June 2022. For NBS coordinators who did not complete the survey, a reminder email was sent after 2 weeks followed by a phone call to prompt survey completion. Results: Completed surveys were received from 34 NBS coordinators representing 34 states and 1 US territory (Puerto Rico). All respondents (100%) agreed that knowledge of SCT status is important for reproductive decision-making. Although a majority (62%, n=21/32) agreed that SCT status is a public health concern for their state, only 11 (32%) agreed that ensuring counseling to SCT carriers is the responsibility of state newborn screening programs, as noted in figure 1. Notification procedures: All responding NBS coordinators (100%) provide notification of SCT status to either a pediatrician or parent, with 17 (50%) notifying both the parent and pediatrician, 15 (44%) notifying the pediatrician only, and 2 (6%) notifying the parent only. As depicted in Figure 2, parents are most commonly notified by mail only whereas pediatrician notification varies from mail only to fax only to phone call in addition to written notification. More than one-third (36%) of respondents acknowledged that pediatrician information was missing or inaccurate between 25-50% of the time. Of the 18 NBS programs that notify parents, 6 (33%) provide written/online information about SCT only, 4 (22%) provide resources for local genetic counseling centers only, 6 (33%) provide both written information about SCT and resources for local genetic counseling centers, and 2 (11%) report providing results only. Only two NBS centers note running their own SCT counseling programs. Renotification procedures: No state reported routine renotification of SCT carriers at reproductive age. All states (100%) reported retaining electronic records of SCT status; however, in the majority of states (57%), electronic records are available only after 2000 with the last state adopting electronic records in 2019. NBS electronic records can be accessed directly by pediatricians/primary care doctors in 12/34 (35%) of states; however, no state operates a publicly available database to allow individuals to access their own records. Conclusion: SCT notification procedures vary widely across states in the US. The majority of states rely on pediatricians to counsel parents and individuals about their SCT status. Although knowledge of SCT status is accepted to be an important factor for reproductive-decision making, renotification and/or efficient access of NBS SCT results at reproductive age is not available in most states. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Psychosocial Issues Related to Newborn Screening: A Systematic Review and Synthesis.

Genomic advances have contributed to a proliferation of newborn screening (NBS) programs. Psychosocial consequences of NBS have been identified as risks to these public health initiatives. Following PRISMA guidelines, this systematic review synthesizes findings from 92 evidence-based, peer-reviewed research reports published from 2000 through 2020 regarding psychosocial issues associated with NBS. Results describe parents’ knowledge of and attitudes towards NBS, reactions to and understanding of positive NBS results, experiences of communication with health providers, decisions about carrier testing, and future pregnancies. Findings also explain the impact of positive NBS results on parent–child relationships, child development, informing children about carrier status, family burden, quality of life, and disparities. In conclusion, psychosocial consequences of receiving unexpected neonatal screening results and unsolicited genetic information remain significant risks to expansion of NBS. Findings suggest that risks may be mitigated by improved parent NBS education, effective communication, individualized genetic counseling, and anticipatory developmental guidance. Clinicians need to take extra measures to ensure equitable service delivery to marginalized subpopulations. Future investigations should be more inclusive of culturally and socioeconomically diverse families and conducted in low-resource countries. Providing these countries with adequate resources to develop NBS programs is an essential step towards achieving international health equity.

Co-designing Improved Communication of Newborn Bloodspot Screening Results to Parents: Mixed Methods Study.

BackgroundEach year in England, almost 10,000 parents are informed of their child’s positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results. This occurs approximately 2 to 8 weeks after birth depending on the condition. Communication of positive NBS results is a subtle and skillful task, demanding thought, preparation, and evidence to minimize potentially harmful negative sequelae. Evidence of variability in the content and the way the result is currently communicated has the potential to lead to increased parental anxiety and distress.ObjectiveThis study focused on the development of co-designed interventions to improve the experiences of parents receiving positive NBS results for their children and enhance communication between health care professionals and parents.MethodsAn experience-based co-design approach was used to explore experiences and co-design solutions with 17 health professionals employed in 3 National Health Service Trusts in England and 21 parents (13/21, 62% mothers and 8/21, 38% fathers) of 14 children recruited from the same 3 National Health Service Trusts. Experiences with existing services were gathered via semistructured interviews with health professionals. Filmed narrative interviews with parents were developed into a composite film. The co-design process identified priorities for improving communication of positive NBS results through separate parent and health professional feedback events followed by joint feedback events. In total, 4 interventions were then co-designed between the participants through a web-based platform.ResultsParents and health professionals provided positive feedback regarding the process of gathering experiences and identifying priorities. Themes identified from the parent interviews included impact of initial communication, parental reactions, attending the first clinic appointment, impact of health professionals’ communication strategies and skills, impact of diagnosis on family and friends, improvements to the communication of positive NBS results, and parents’ views on NBS. Themes identified from the health professional interviews included communication between health professionals, process of communicating with the family, parent- and family-centered care, and availability of resources and challenges to effective communication. In response to these themes, 4 interventions were co-designed: changes to the NBS card; standardized laboratory proformas; standardized communication checklists; and an email or letter for providing reliable, up-to-date, condition-specific information for parents following the communication of positive NBS results.ConclusionsParents and health professionals were able to successfully work together to identify priorities and develop co-designed interventions to improve communication of positive NBS results to parents. The resulting co-designed interventions address communication at different stages of the communication pathway to improve the experiences of parents receiving positive NBS results for their children.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)RR2-10.1186/s40814-019-0487-5

A Qualitative Study: Mothers' Experiences of Their Child's Late-Onset Pompe Disease Diagnosis Following Newborn Screening.

Pompe disease was added to the United States recommended uniform screening panel in 2015 to avoid diagnostic delay and implement prompt treatment, specifically for those with infantile-onset Pompe disease (IOPD). However, most newborns with abnormal newborn screening (NBS) for Pompe disease have late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD). An early diagnosis of LOPD raises the question of when symptoms will arise which is challenging for parents, patients, and providers managing an LOPD diagnosis. This study aimed to characterize mothers’ experiences of their child’s LOPD diagnosis and medical monitoring. A qualitative descriptive approach was chosen to gain an in-depth understanding of parental experiences. Eight mothers were interviewed about their experiences with positive NBS and diagnosis, experiences with living with the diagnosis, and experiences with medical monitoring. Interview transcripts were analyzed through conventional content analysis. Negative emotions like fear were more frequent with communication of NBS results. Participants expressed uncertainty surrounding age of symptom onset and the future. The medical monitoring experience increased worry but participants expressed that being vigilant with management reassured them. Parental emotions shifted to thankfulness and reassurance with time and education. These findings can provide guidance to providers about the psychosocial implications of receiving positive NBS results and an LOPD diagnosis.

Co-designed strategies for delivery of positive newborn bloodspot screening results to parents: the ReSPoND mixed-methods study

BackgroundNewborn bloodspot screening identifies presymptomatic babies who are affected by genetic or congenital conditions. Each year, around 10,000 parents of babies born in England are given a positive newborn bloodspot screening result for one of nine conditions that are currently screened for. Despite national guidance, variation exists regarding the approaches used to communicate these results to families; poor communication practices can lead to various negative sequelae.ObjectivesIdentify and quantify approaches that are currently used to deliver positive newborn bloodspot screening results to parents (phase 1). Develop (phase 2), implement and evaluate (phase 3) co-designed interventions for improving the delivery of positive newborn bloodspot screening results. Quantify the resources required to deliver the co-designed interventions in selected case-study sites and compare these with costs associated with current practice (phase 3).DesignThis was a mixed-methods study using four phases, with defined outputs underpinned by Family Systems Theory.SettingAll newborn bloodspot screening laboratories in England (n = 13).ParticipantsLaboratory staff and clinicians involved in processing or communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results, and parents of infants who had received a positive or negative newborn bloodspot screening result.InterventionsThree co-designed interventions that were developed during phase 2 and implemented during phase 3 of the study.Main outcome measureAcceptability of the co-designed interventions for the communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results.ResultsStaff were acutely aware of the significance of a positive newborn bloodspot screening result and the impact that this could have on families. Challenges existed when communicating results from laboratories to relevant clinicians, particularly in the case of congenital hypothyroidism. Clinicians who were involved in the communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results were committed to making sure that the message, although distressing for parents, was communicated well. Despite this, variation in communication practices existed. This was influenced by many factors, including the available resources and lack of clear guidance. Although generally well received, implementation of the co-designed interventions in practice served to illuminate barriers to acceptability and feasibility. The interventions would not influence NHS expenditure and could be cost neutral when delivered by teleconsultations.LimitationsParticipants with a pre-existing interest in this topic may have been more likely to self-select into the study. The researchers are experienced in this field, which may have biased data collection and analysis. COVID-19 hindered implementation and related data collection of the co-designed interventions.ConclusionsThere was variation in the processes used to report positive newborn bloodspot screening results from newborn bloodspot screening laboratories to clinical teams and then to families. The various practices identified may reflect local needs, but more often reflected local resource. A more consistent ‘best practice’ approach is required, not just in the UK but perhaps globally. The co-designed interventions represent a starting point for achieving this.Future workFuture work should include a national evaluation study with predefined outcomes, accompanied by an economic evaluation, to assess the acceptability, feasibility and usability of the co-designed interventions in practice nationally.Trial registrationThis trial is registered as ISRCTN15330120.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme and will be published in full inHealth and Social Care Delivery Research; Vol. 10, No. 19. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Biotinidase activity is affected by both seasonal temperature and filter collection cards

This study set out to examine pre-analytical factors affecting the frequency of positive results in newborn screening for biotinidase deficiency. This investigation was prompted by an increase in the annual screen positive rate for biotinidase deficiency in Ontario from 2.65x10−4 in 2016 to 6.57x10−4 in 2017.Season and trend decomposition was used to separate seasonality from an underlying trend in the time series of biotindase activity measurements for the period 2014–01-12 to 2019–07-27 (n = 798,770). This analysis revealed a marked seasonal effect (winter = median + ⩽ 17 MRU, summer = mean - ⩽20 MRU) and a non-linear negative trend. Seasonal temperature was correlated with biotinidase results (Pearson’s r = 0.79) but not with the observed negative trend (Pearson’s r = 0.0025). Time series analysis of biotinidase results grouped by print lot of filter paper revealed that recently printed filter paper cards inhibit biotinidase and that this inhibition resolved over time. This study demonstrates that biotindase activity is inhibited by both increased seasonal temperature and collection on newly printed filter cards.

Pain points in parents\u2019 interactions with newborn screening systems: a qualitative study

Background & ObjectivesThis study aims to explore and elucidate parents’ experience of newborn screening [NBS], with the overarching goal of identifying desiderata for the development of informatics-based educational and health management resources.MethodsWe conducted four focus groups and four one-on-one qualitative interviews with a total of 35 participants between March and September 2020. Participants were grouped into three types: parents who had received true positive newborn screening results; parents who had received false positive results; and soon-to-be parents who had no direct experience of the screening process. Interview data were subjected to analysis using an inductive, constant comparison approach.ResultsResults are divided into five sections: (1) experiences related to the process of receiving NBS results and prior knowledge of the NBS program; (2) approaches to the management of a child’s medical data; (3) sources of additional informational and emotional support; (4) barriers faced by parents navigating the health system; and (5) recommendations and suggestions for new parents experiencing the NBS process.ConclusionOur analysis revealed a wide range of experiences of, and attitudes towards the newborn screening program and the wider newborn screening system. While parents’ view of the screening process was – on the whole – positive, some participants reported experiencing substantial frustration, particularly related to how results are initially communicated and difficulties in accessing reliable, timely information. This frustration with current information management and education resources indicates a role for informatics-based approaches in addressing parents’ information needs.

Delivering Positive Newborn Screening Results: Cost Analysis of Existing Practice versus Innovative, Co-Designed Strategies from the ReSPoND Study.

Although the communication pathways of Newborn Bloodspot Screening (NBS) are a delicate task, these pathways vary across different conditions and are often not evidence-based. The ReSPoND interventions were co-designed by healthcare professionals alongside parents who had received a positive NBS result for their child. To calculate the cost of these co-designed strategies and the existing communication pathways, we interviewed 71 members of the clinical and laboratory staff of the 13 English NBS laboratories in the English National Health Service. Therefore, a scenario analysis was used to compare the cost of the existing communication pathways to the co-designed strategies delivered by (i) home-visits and (ii) telecommunications. On average, the existing communication pathway cost £447.08 per infant (range: £237.12 to £628.51) or £234,872.75 (£3635.99 to £1,932,986.23) nationally. Implementing the new interventions relying on home-visits exclusively would cost on average £521.62 (£312.84 to £646.39) per infant and £297,816.03 (£4506.37 to £2,550,284.64) nationally, or £447.19 (£235.79 to £552.03) and £231,342.40 (£3923.7 to £1,922,192.22) if implemented via teleconsultations, respectively. The new strategies delivered are not likely to require additional resources compared with current practice. Further research is needed to investigate whether this investment represents good value for money for the NHS budget.

Making Decisions About Krabbe Disease Newborn Screening.

Making Decisions About Krabbe Disease Newborn Screening.

Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Knowledge and Information Needs Among Healthcare Providers.

BackgroundSevere combined immunodeficiency (SCID) is a group of life-threatening genetic disorders responsible for severe dysfunctions of the immune system. Despite the expansion of newborn screening in the U.S., there are gaps in healthcare providers' knowledge of SCID.MethodsWe recruited 277 U.S. healthcare providers for an online survey. The survey assessed providers' experience with SCID patients, knowledge about SCID, and needs and preferred formats for SCID-related informational resources. We examined differences between providers who have seen 2 or more patients with SCID (SCID provider group) and those who have seen 0–1 SCID patients (non-SCID provider group).ResultsOverall, 210 (75.8%) providers were included in the non-SCID provider group, and 121 (57.6%) of these providers were pediatricians. Compared to the SCID provider group, non-SCID provider group reported lower mean rating of SCID knowledge (x̄ = 4.8 vs. x̄ = 8.6, p < 0.0001) and higher informational needs. The largest informational needs identified by the non-SCID provider group were “understanding specific type of SCID” and “understanding what to expect across the lifespan.” In the SCID provider group, the highest rated informational need was “family support referrals.” Participants in the non-SCID provider group identified scientific publications and websites as preferred formats, with some variation between medical specialties.ConclusionBased on their experience with treating SCID patients, providers have varying levels of SCID knowledge and different informational needs. For providers who have encountered few SCID patients, informational needs start early, usually immediately after receiving a positive newborn screening result. These findings provide useful direction for the development and preferred outlets for receiving SCID-related information, with some variations between different types of providers. Results from this study will serve as a guide for creating relevant and accessible SCID resources for providers who can utilize them to improve care for SCID patients.

The Alberta Newborn Screening Approach for Sickle Cell Disease: The Advantages of Molecular Testing.

Sickle cell disease (SCD), a group of inherited red blood cell (RBC) disorders caused by pathogenic variants in the beta-globin gene (HBB), can cause lifelong disabilities and/or early mortality. If diagnosed early, preventative measures significantly reduce adverse outcomes related to SCD. In Alberta, Canada, SCD was added to the newborn screening (NBS) panel in April 2019. The primary conditions screened for are sickle cell anemia (HbS/S), HbS/C disease, and HbS/β thalassemia. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the first 19 months of SCD screening performance, as well as described our approach for screening of infants that have received a red blood cell transfusion prior to collection of NBS specimen. Hemoglobins eluted from dried blood spots were analyzed using the Bio-Rad™ VARIANT nbs analyzer (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). Targeted sequencing of HBB was performed concurrently in samples from all transfused infants. During the period of this study, 43 of 80,314 screened infants received a positive NBS result for SCD, and of these, 34 were confirmed by diagnostic testing, suggesting a local SCD incidence of 1:2400 births. There were 608 infants with sickle cell trait, resulting in a carrier frequency of 1:130. Over 98% of non-transfused infants received their NBS results within 10 days of age. Most of the 188 transfused infants and 2 infants who received intrauterine transfusions received their final SCD screen results within 21 ± 10 d of birth. Our SCD screening algorithm enables detection of affected newborns on the initial NBS specimen, independent of the reported blood transfusion status.

Processing of Positive Newborn Screening Results for Congenital Hypothyroidism: A Qualitative Exploration of Current Practice in England.

The objective of this research was to explore current communication practices for positive newborn bloodspot screening results for congenital hypothyroidism from the newborn bloodspot screening laboratory to clinicians and then families, in order to (i) understand how the pathway is implemented in practice, (ii) highlight regional differences and (iii) identify barriers and facilitators. A qualitative exploratory design was employed using semi-structured interviews across 13 newborn bloodspot screening laboratories in England. Participants included 35 clinicians and 17 NBS laboratory staff across the 13 laboratories and 18 members of relevant clinical teams. Findings illuminated variations in how positive newborn bloodspot screening results for congenital hypothyroidism are communicated in practice. This included regional variations due to historical arrangements and local resources. Contacting the appropriate person could be challenging and obtaining feedback from clinical teams to the laboratory after the child has been seen could be time consuming for those involved. Standardised communication model(s) for positive newborn bloodspot screening results for congenital hypothyroidism, which include named contact individuals, defined pathways of care and processes for feeding back to laboratories, may help to ensure the process is less labour intensive, particularly from a laboratory perspective.

Reduction in Newborn Screening False Positive Results Following a New Collection Protocol: a Quality Improvement Project.

Premature infants are known to have a higher rate of false positive newborn screening (NBS) results, with TPN as a contributing factor. The purpose of this quality improvement (QI) project is to reduce false positive NBS results via a TPN interruption protocol. A multidisciplinary team reviewed the literature and developed a new NBS collection protocol, which was implemented in 2 periods. In period 1, TPN was interrupted for 4 hours before NBS sample collection and initiation of carnitine supplements was avoided. In period 2, TPN was interrupted for 6 hours for infants birth weight (BW) < 1000 g, carnitine supplementation continued to be avoided. The rates of false positives NBS results were compared pre- and post-interventions in periods 1 and 2. Four hundred twelve neonates were evaluated prior to implementation of this QI project (July 2013-June 2014) and 414 during period 1 intervention (July 2014-June 2016). False positive results decreased from 20.6% to 11.4% (p < 0.001) among all BW categories following the 4-hour TPN interruption. The rate of false positives was further reduced among infants < 1000 g (p = 0.035) in period 2 (n = 112), including a significant reduction in false positive results with elevated amino acid profiles (p = 0.005). The implementation of a strict NBS collection protocol reduced false positive NBS results, which potentially can improve patient care by reducing unnecessary laboratory draws, pain, and parental anxiety. Interruption of TPN for 6 hours was significant in reducing NBS false positive results in neonates < 1000 g.