This paper is a continuation of the analysis of hominid social structure and its effect on human evolution, centering on the influence of intergroup structure. Using sociobiological theory and comparative ethology, it was determined that hominid groups were probably fairly intolerant of each other, with meetings characterized by mostly limited conflict, with occasional episodes of co-operation or avoidance depending upon the situation. The effect of weapons was examined using game theory, a computer simulation and the idea of the evolutionary stable strategy (ESS). The influence of weapons on the hominid groups' ESS was to shift it toward a much more war-like character, with greatly increased levels of intergroup conflict. This new level of conflict led to a positive feedback system, where conflict selected for greater intelligence, which created better weapons, which then increased selection for conflict and so on. Conflict also selected for a stronger social structure and larger groups. As the hominid groups increased in size and genetic heterogenity, the selective force of intergroup conflict decreased and eventually the positive feedback system was halted. Larger groups also created a pre-adaptation for monogamy by increasing the number of subordinates who could mate (they would be monogamous) and thus the proportion of genes contributed by monogamy to the next generation.