Byline: T. Sathyanarayana Rao, Chittaranjan. Andrade The previous issue of the Indian Journal of Psychiatry carried an editorial [sup][1] which observed that India does not have adequate psychiatric manpower, that there are few psychiatric centers in the country that are strongly oriented toward academics and research, and that, in consequence, many psychiatric centers with an interest in research may not have the necessary skills to demonstrate or create excellence in research. The editorial [sup][1] further observed that sustained exposure to good quality research in high ranking journals, combined with the development of the ability to critically evaluate a study and its place in the field, are together necessary to drive the desired improvements. The editorial [sup][1] referred to an initiative that was in the pipeline at the time of writing. This initiative sought to develop an e-platform for discussing and imparting training in research-related issues in the field of mental health and the allied neurosciences, linking postgraduate and academic psychiatry departments across the country. We are delighted to announce that, during the second week of March, 2015, the E-Journal Club (eJCIndia) initiative was successfully launched by the Task Force of the Indian Psychiatric Society on Psychopharmacology, along with the Task Force of the Indian Psychiatric Society on Workshops and Training, and with the support of the Department of Psychopharmacology at the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru. As of the first week of April, 2015, the e-group already has nearly 200 members, comprising postgraduate students, postgraduate teachers, and psychiatrists who are interested in academia even though their practice is not part of an academic environment. The eJCIndia group has completed several activities. The first activity presented an extract from the results of a meta-analysis [sup][2] and invited the membership to comment on whether they would alter their clinical practice based on a highlighted statistically significant finding. After discussion, an answer was provided that explained concepts in meta-analysis, aspects related to schizophrenia rating using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), and the clinical significance (as distinct from statistical significance) of a difference in PANSS ratings. Another activity sought to stimulate critical thought by examining paradoxes in the pillars of homeopathy, a school of treatment that enjoys popularity in India and elsewhere. Homeopathy considers that the administration of a diluted dose of a substance that produces a symptom will treat that symptom when that symptom occurs as part of an illness; the greater the dilution, the greater the efficacy of the treatment. It was discussed that the water that we drink has, in the past, come in contact with thousands of chemicals. This water, to use a concept in homeopathy, will therefore contain of those chemicals. Hence, water should be therapeutic for every disease! Alternately, how do we know that the memories in the water that we drink won't cancel out the memories of the homeopathic medicines? Then, what about the solvent that was used for the dilution of the homeopathic treatment; that would also have previously come in contact with plenty of substances with therapeutic or adverse effect potential, resulting with the potential to interact with the homeopathic substance(s). …