Catheter Tip Position Research Articles

A case of intraoperative detection of a central venous catheter in azygos vein arch during esophageal cancer surgery.

Central venous catheter (CVC) is often used in the perioperative management of esophageal cancer. The position of the CVC tip has been reported to shift with body positioning and, although infrequent, may traverse into the azygos vein arch. Herein, we describe a case where a migrated CVC tip in the azygous vein arch was identified during esophageal cancer surgery, preventing CVC dissection concurrent with azygous vein arch resection. A 65-year-old man was diagnosed with advanced esophageal cancer and was referred to our department for surgery after undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. He underwent robot-assisted subtotal esophagectomy, followed by gastric conduit reconstruction via the posterior sternal route. Thoracic manipulation was performed with the patient in the prone position. During the surgery, a foreign body was found in the azygos vein arch, indicating that a central venous catheter had inadvertently entered the azygos vein arch. The catheter was retracted by 5cm, and after confirming that no catheter remained in the azygos arch, the azygos vein arch was separated using an autosuture device. Central venous catheter migration can occur in a various vessels. During prone esophageal cancer surgery, elevating the right upper extremity may alter the catheter tip's position from its the preoperative position. CVC amputation should be observed because the azygos vein arch is often amputated to facilitate upper mediastinal dissection during esophageal cancer surgery.

A simple calculation formula for the insertion depth of catheter of the central venous access port in Chinese patients

BackgroundThe catheter tip placed between the T6 and T7 vertebrae is recognized as an optimal position for the totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs). This study aimed to propose a simple formula for calculating the optimal insertion depth of the right internal jugular central venous catheter (CVC) of TIVAP in Chinese patients. MethodsThis was a prospective observational study. The medical records of 151 patients with TIVAPs placement were retrospectively analyzed. Patient's height and actual insertion depth of CVC were used to build a simple linear regression model. The Peres’ formula was revised to better calculate the optimal insertion depth of the right internal jugular CVC of TIVAPs, accounting for population-specific anatomical variations observed in Chinese patients. A total of 158 patients scheduled for TIVAPs placement were prospectively recruited. The insertion depth of catheter was preoperatively determined according to the established formula, and postoperative chest X-ray was performed to determine the position of catheter tip. The rate of proper position of catheter (the catheter tip within T6 or T7 vertebrae) was calculated to assess the clinical feasibility and effectiveness of the new formula. ResultsThe proper position rate was 64.24% (97/151) in the retrospective group. According to patients’ height and insertion depth of CVC of these 97 cases with proper position, Peres’ formula was revised to ‘insertion depth = 0.1*height – 4 (cm)’. Based on insertion depth predicted by the new formula, the proper position rate in the prospective group reached 86.08% (136/158). ConclusionThe simple formula for calculating the insertion depth of right internal jugular CVC of TIVAPs is clinically feasible for Chinese patients.

Value of projectional imaging relative to cross-sectional imaging to assess catheter tip position in the superior vena cava: Evaluation of reader variability.

The assessment of correct positioning of central venous catheters (CVC) is of major concern to avoid complications.Vascular access associations have established the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) as the most appropriate CVC tip location. Among the different chest X-ray (CXR) landmarks proposed for assessing tip position relative to the CAJ, only the pericardial reflection lies in the same plane as the vascular structures assessed. Although extensively used, CXR has been criticized for its difficulty in estimating catheter tip location.We aimed to evaluate the observer variability to determine tip positioning on CXR. CT imaging was used as a gold standard for tip identification. 107 CT scans of patients wearing port access catheter devices realized at the XXX University Hospital between January and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Distance from tip to cavo-atrial junction (DCAJ) was measured on topogram projectional imaging (PJ) and axial cross-sectional imaging (CS) by 2 × 2 observers (within and between evaluations). Observational statistics were reported using a paired t-test, repeatability coefficients (RC), and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and they were displayed comprehensively using Bland-Altman plots. All ICC were >0.9, indicating excellent reliability. The mean difference between observers comparing CS and PJ was 0.13 ± 0.80 cm (P = 0.10) with outer 95% confidence limits of 1.92 cm and -2.17 cm and an RC of 1.79 cm. CXR tip-position reading remains an accurate method for determining CVC localization. However, the assessment variability on CXR is plus or minus 2 cm and should be considered. Chest X-ray (CXR) for the assessment of tip position is subject to intra-individual and inter-individual variation. On CT, the variability is solely linked to determining the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) and represented about 1 cm. On CXR, there is a twofold challenge: the correct determination of the CAJ and the accurate identification of the catheter tip, leading to a greater variability of 2 cm.In clinical practice, while considering the 3 cm anatomical zone around the CAJ acceptable, operators should be aware of the 2 cm variability resulting from CXR assessment. To account for this variability and avoid the risk of positioning the tip beyond 3 cm from the CAJ (theoretically up to plus or minus 5 cm away from the CAJ), operators should reduce the CXR-based acceptable zone to 1 cm around the CAJ. This change may impact up to thirty percent of procedures.

Are variations in ventricular catheter placement related to design of the catheter? A single-center cohort study.

The use of intracranial catheters is a common procedure used for neurosurgical patients with a variety of pathologies. Despite its frequency of use, shunt failure and revision have been reported to be a common problem. Given that depth of insertion can significantly affect the catheter tip position, a single institution retrospective chart review was performed to examine the accuracy of shunt and external ventricular drain (EVD) placement. Computed tomography (CT) images of the head following shunt or ventriculostomy insertion were analyzed to determine the delta between the final length of the intracranial catheter and the intended depth described in the operative notes. We found that there was a statistically significant difference in the accuracy of placement when comparing EVDs to shunts. The most used EVDs at our institution are marked with a solid black line in increments spaced 2 cm apart. The most used ventricular shunt catheter has a marking at 5 cm and 10 cm from the tip of the catheter. We believe that the visual confirmation that is afforded by metric unit markings on the EVD allows for better final placement of the catheter at the outer table of the calvarium. The addition of regular millimeter metric unit markings by the manufacturer is imperative in decreasing the chances of error in the insertion of ventricular catheters and preventing potential neurovascular injury to the surrounding structures.

Catheter Exchange With Elongation of Tunnel (CEET) Procedure-A Novel Technique for Cuff Extrusion of Tunneled Dialysis Catheter: Surgical Experience and Early Outcomes.

Cuff extrusion of tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) leads to catheter dysfunction, leading to loss of vascular access and the need for new catheter. Definitive management is to remove TDC and reinsert new catheter by new venous puncture and tunnel, which may not be possible in all cases. The study evaluated the surgical experience and early outcomes of a novel "Catheter Exchange with Elongation of Tunnel (CEET)" procedure for cuff extrusion. The retrospective study included all cases of hemodialysis with TDC with partial or complete cuff extrusion and excluded complete catheter dislodgement, tunnel infection, or any catheter related infection. All patients also underwent the CEET procedure under fluoroscopy guidance, and the clinical details and outcomes were analyzed. Eleven cases of TDC cuff extrusion underwent the CEET procedure of which three (27.2%) had previous and four (36.4%) had partial cuff extrusion, and seven cases (63.6%) had short tunnel length, which likely predisposed to cuff extrusion. CEET procedure was successful in 10 cases (success rate 90.1%) with desired position of catheter tip and good blood flow. Study population was divided into early and late cuff extrusion (≥1 month). Short tunnel length was associated with late extrusion (p = 0.05), whereas premature removal of TDC anchor sutures was associated with early cuff extrusion (p = 0.04). CEET procedure is a successful alternative technique for correction of cuff extrusion of TDC with good success rate. Premature removal of anchor sutures was associated with early cuff extrusion, whereas short tunnel length was associated with late cuff extrusion.

Feasibility of a new ultrasound guided procedure to ensure the correct position of the central venous catheter tip

BackgroundSafety of central venous catheter (CVC) placement relies on some general aspects, including selection of the right vessel, correct lumen targeting while inserting the needle, check the position of catheter tip, and post-procedure check for complications. All these four points can be guided by bedside ultrasound, but the best technique to ensure the position of the CVC tip is still uncertain. MethodsWe investigated feasibility of a novel ultrasound technique consisting of focused view of guidewire tip in the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) to calculate the CVC depth in adult patients needing CVC placement in emergency. Direct visualization of the guidewire in the CAJ was used to calculate how deep the CVC needed to be inserted. In those patients without a valid CAJ window, a bubble test in the right atrium was performed to position the CVC tip. In all cases chest radiography confirmed the CVC position. ResultsThe procedure was performed in 37 patients and CVC was correctly placed in all cases. Within the group, in 25 patients the CVC depth (21.5 ± 6.0 cm) was successfully measured. In other 11 patients the correct CVC tip position was confirmed by the bubble test. In only one case it was not possible to use ultrasound for incomplete CAJ and right atrium views. ConclusionsThis study confirms the feasibility of a new ultrasound method to ensure the correct CVC tip position. This protocol could potentially become a standard method reducing costs, post-procedural irradiation, and time of CVC placement in emergency.

Comparison of feasibility and effectiveness of tunneled dialysis catheter placement with or without DSA guidance: a propensity score-matched cohort study

Background In some resource-limited regions, the placement of tunneled dialysis catheters (TDC) is often preferred under ultrasound guidance rather than fluoroscopy. This study compared ultrasound-and digital subtraction angiography-guided (DSA)-guided TDC in renal replacement therapy. Methods This retrospective cohort study included all TDC placements performed at our hospital between January 2020 and October 2022. We utilized 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) to balance the demographic and clinical characteristics of the DSA-guided and ultrasound-guided groups. Dialysis prescriptions and actual dialysis completion were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Multivariable logistic regression analyses determined the risk factors for early termination of dialysis. The differences in adverse events, catheter function, and catheter tip position were evaluated between the two groups. Results The study included 261 patients (142 in the DSA-guided group and 119 in the ultrasound-guided group). After PSM, 91 patients were included in each group, with no significant baseline differences (p > .1). Both groups achieved adequate catheter blood flow and ultrafiltration volumes without deviations from dialysis prescriptions (ICC ≥ 0.75). The DSA-guided group had fewer early dialysis terminations than the ultrasound-guided group (3.3 vs. 12.0%, p = .026). The position of the catheter tip in the right atrium was more consistent in the DSA-guided group (100 vs. 74.2%, p < .001). Conclusion Hemodialysis catheters inserted under DSA guidance exhibited superior performance compared to those inserted under ultrasound guidance, primarily due to more accurate catheter tip positioning. DSA guidance is recommended when ensuring optimal catheter tip placement.

Real-Time Ultrasound Tip Location Reduces Malposition and Radiation Exposure during Umbilical Venous Catheter Placement in Neonates: A Retrospective, Observational Study

Introduction: The umbilical venous catheter is a vital access device in neonatal intensive care units for preterm and critically ill infants. Correct positioning is crucial, as malpositioning can lead to severe complications. According to international guidelines, the position of the umbilical venous catheter tip must be assessed in real time; traditionally, the catheter is visualized with a thoracoabdominal X-ray, but one of the most effective and safest methods is therefore real-time ultrasound. Methods: This study compares real-time ultrasound and traditional X-ray methods for assessing umbilical venous catheter tip location in 461 cases. The rate of tip malposition was analyzed retrospectively. The secondary aim was to assess indwelling time of umbilical venous catheters and reasons of removal. Results: Real-time ultrasound tip location, found to be more reliable and efficient, demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of primary malpositioning compared to X-ray assessments (9.6 vs. 75.9%). The study also highlighted the association of real-time ultrasound with reduced catheter manipulation, fewer radiographs, and higher indwelling times of umbilical venous catheter. The multiple logistic regression showed a high probability of the central safe position of the umbilical venous catheter tip using real-time ultrasound tip location (odds ratio 29.5, 95% confidence interval: 17.4–49.4). Conclusion: The findings support the adoption of real-time ultrasound in clinical settings to enhance umbilical venous catheter placement accuracy and minimize associated risks. A minimal training investment is needed to attain the proficiency to visualize the umbilical venous catheters, offering a substantial advantage in terms of both cost-effectiveness for the procedure and enhanced patient safety.

Cost comparison of four venous catheters: Short peripheral catheter, Long peripheral line, Midline, and PICC for peripheral infusion

Introduction: The use of midline catheters for patients requiring a peripheral IV infusion is sometimes limited by their cost. Although decision trees allow them to be positioned in relation to short peripheral cannulas (SPC), Midlines, and PICCs, their economic impact has not yet been evaluated. A study was conducted to estimate and compare the actual costs of using the three types of catheters for durations of 7, 14, and 21 days. Methods: A budget impact analysis compared midlines or mini-midlines/long peripheral cannulas (LPCs) with SPCs and PICCs for typical medical indications excluding indications requiring central line (infusion of irritant or vesicant drugs): treatment of peritonitis over 7 days, cystic fibrosis infection over 14 days, and meningitis over 21 days. A micro-costing study identified resources used during catheter care procedures (consumables, medical/nursing care, examinations, mechanical complications). The cost of remote systemic complications was estimated from the French national cost study. Literature review compared data based on published complication frequencies. Results: Midline is more economic than the SPC (saving of 39€ over 7 days and 174€ over 14 days), and than the PICC (saving of 102€ over 14 days and 95€ over 21 days). Discussion: Despite a much higher acquisition cost of the Midline than a SPC, the cost of using a Midline is lower. Although this approach cannot be the only argument for choosing a medical device, it can contribute to it in a tense economic context. The micro-costing has been performed in a center placing PICCline using fluoroscopy for catheter tip positioning. The implantation of a PICC with ECG technique does not require an interventional radiology facility and involves significantly lower logistical and personnel costs. This factor is a limitation in this study. However, even with the use of EGC, the cost difference is in favor of Midline.

Assessment of Central Catheter Tip Position in Neonates by Ultrasonography Versus X-ray

Assessment of Central Catheter Tip Position in Neonates by Ultrasonography Versus X-ray

Evaluation of the position of the central venous catheter tip of implantable venous access devices in the occurrence of postoperative thrombotic and non-thrombotic complications.

The position of the catheter tip of totally implantable venous access devices (TIVAD) is a risk factor for postoperative complications. The study aim was to assess the early and late complications (EC and LC) associated with the position of the catheter tip in cancer patients. We reviewed cancer patients who had a TIVAD placed in 2020. EC (≤ 90days), LC (> 90days) and risk factors for TIVAD-associated complications were assessed. The vertical mismatch of the catheter tip was compared to an "ideal position" (> 10mm below the carina and ≥ 20mm below the right main bronchus (RMB)) using chest x-ray, post-implantation. 301 patients were included. Median follow-up after TIVAD implantation was 9.4months. All TIVAD catheters were inserted via the internal jugular vein (IJV). The mean distance between the catheter tip and the carina and the RMB was 21.3mm and 6.63mm respectively. In total, 11.3% patients developed EC and 5.6% had LC. An association was found between the position of the catheter tip from the carina (≤ 10mm vs. > 10mm) and the occurrence of EC (18.3% vs. 8.6%, p = 0.01) and for the catheter insertion side (left IJV vs. right IJV) (19.1% vs. 9.0% p = 0.02). Multivariate analysis showed that left IJV catheter insertion (OR 2.76), and a catheter tip located ≤ 10mm below the carina (OR 2.71) are significant independent risk factors of EC. TIVAD catheter tip located at ≤ 10mm below the carina, and a left-side inserted catheter, are higher risk of EC.

Real-time localization for port-implanted catheter tip by echocardiographic guidance

The clinical data of 23 patients undergoing real-time echocardiography-guided infusion port implantation in the Breast Center of Tsinghua Changgung Hospital in Beijing from January to July 2021 were analyzed. The length of catheter insertion L1 was initially estimated using surface measurement method in all patients. Intraoperatively, transthoracic echocardiography was applied using the parasternal four-chamber view to visualize the catheter image within the right atrium, and the length of catheter insertion L2 was recorded under the guidance of echocardiography. Postoperatively, chest radiographs were taken in the upright position to observe the position of the catheter tip. According to chest CT scans, the ideal length (L) for catheter tip placement was calculated when it was located at the junction of superior vena cava and right atrium. Bland-Altman scatter plot analysis and linear regression fitting test were used on L1 and L2 respectively with L to evaluate the consistency. A total of 23 patients were included in this study, among which one case of left breast cancer patient undergoing breast-conserving surgery had difficulty in identifying the catheter tip position due to residual pleural effusion obscuring the imaging of the cardiac apex four-chamber view. In 22 patients, the results of intraoperative ultrasound imaging were good, including 1 case of catheter ectopic to azygos vein, and 21 cases of right atrial catheter could be detected by ultrasound. Statistical analysis showed that there was a good consistency between L1 and L, L2 and L, and the difference between them was d=0.28 cm (95%CI:-1.76-2.31 cm) and d=0.20 cm(95%CI:-0.84-1.23 cm), respectively, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). In the linear regression model, L2 and L had a higher fit than L1, and the difference was statistically significant (R²=0.954, P<0.001). This study found that real-time echocardiographic localization technique can be applied in adult port surgery to replace X-ray-guided real-time catheter tip detection and adjustment to the optimal position.

Fluid-filled versus sensor-tipped pressure guidewires for FFR and Pd/Pa measurement; PW-COMPARE study

BackgroundFluid-filled pressure guidewires are unaffected by the previously inevitable hydrostatic pressure gradient (HPG). This study aimed to compare simultaneous pressure measurements with fluid-filled and sensor-tipped pressure guidewires. MethodsFifty patients underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) and Pd/Pa measurement with a fluid-filled and a sensor-tipped pressure guidewire simultaneously. To assess maneuverability, patients were randomized with respect to which pressure guidewire was used to cross the lesion first. Lateral fluoroscopy was used to estimate height difference between catheter tip and distal wire position (and thus HPG). Agreement between pressure measurements was studied. ResultsMeasurements were performed in LM (4% (n = 2)), LAD (44% (n = 22)), LCX (26% (n = 13)), and RCA (26% (n = 13)). Simultaneous pressure measurements showed excellent agreement (mean FFR difference − 0.01 ± 0.03 (r = 0.959, p < 0.001), mean Pd/Pa difference − 0.01 ± 0.04 (r = 0.929, p < 0.001)). FFR was ≤0.80 in 42.6% (n = 20) with fluid-filled FFR measurements versus 46.8% (n = 22) by sensor-tipped FFR measurements. Mean height difference was 15 ± 34 mm, and strongly dependent on the coronary artery (LAD 45 ± 10 mm, LCX −23 ± 16 mm, RCA −13 ± 17 mm). There was a strong correlation between height difference and difference in pressure ratios between sensor-tipped and fluid-filled pressure guidewires (FFR r = −0.850, p < 0.001; Pd/Par = −0.641, p < 0.001). Largest FFR differences were present in the LAD (−0.04 ± 0.02). After HPG correction, mean difference between HPG-corrected sensor-tipped FFR and fluid-filled FFR was 0.00 ± 0.02, mean Pd/Pa difference was 0.01 ± 0.03. ConclusionsThis study shows excellent overall correlation between FFR and Pd/Pa measurements with both pressure guidewires. Differences measured with fluid-filled and sensor-tipped pressure guidewires are vessel-specific and attributable to hydrostatic pressure gradients (NCT04802681).

Are multiple projections necessary when assessing umbilical venous catheter placement in neonates? A retrospective study.

There is variability in clinical practice regarding the number of radiographic views required to accurately determine umbilical venous catheter (UVC) tip position. Some units prefer performing a single anteroposterior (AP) view and others do both AP and lateral views. The aim of this study was to compare the need for one versus two radiographical views to accurately determine UVC tip position. Radiographs of 382 infants (all gestations) from two level six neonatal units were included in the study. Patients with congenital anomalies and those who had adjustment of UVC position between AP and lateral films being performed were excluded. Six clinicians reviewed anonymized AP only images and documented UVC tip position. Subsequently, they reviewed both AP and lateral views and again documented the UVC tip position. Results were compared to the expert consensus which was taken from the consensus of two paediatric radiologists. The study population had a mean gestational age of 32.8 weeks and birth weight of 2190 g, with 58% males. The UVC tip positions were accurately determined 76% times by the AP view alone and 82% times by using both the AP and lateral views (P < 0.001). The low placed UVC tip position which is the most inappropriate for use was more accurately determined by two images (78% times) rather than single image (70% times) (P < 0.001). Utilising both AP and lateral views was superior in accurately determining UVC tip position to AP view alone.

Central venous catheter tip positioning using ultrasound in pediatric patients-A prospective observational study.

In children, central venous catheter (CVC) placement is usually performed under ultrasound guidance for optimal visualization of vessels and reduction of puncture-related complications. Nevertheless, in many cases, additional radiographic examinations are performed to check the position of the catheter tip. The primary objective of this observational feasibility study was to determine the number of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter tips that can be identified in a subsequent position check using ultrasonography. Furthermore, we investigated the optimal ultrasound window, time expenditure, and success rate concerning puncture attempts and side effects. In addition, we compared the calculated and real insertion depths and analyzed the position of the catheter tip on postoperative radiographs with the tracheal bifurcation as a traditional landmark. Ninety children with congenital heart defects who required a central venous line for cardiac surgery were included in this single-center study. After the insertion of the catheter, the optimal position of its tip was controlled using one of four predefined ultrasound windows. A chest radiograph was obtained postoperatively in accordance with hospital standards to check the catheter tip position determined by ultrasonography. The children had a median (IQR) age of 11.5 (4.0, 58.8) months and a mean (SD) BMI of 15.3 (2.91) kg/m2 Ultrasound visualization of the catheter tip was successful in 86/90 (95.6%) children (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.3%, 99.8%). Postoperative radiographic examination showed that the catheter tip was in the desired position in 94.4% (95% CI: 89.7%, 99.2%) of the cases. None of the children needed the catheter tip position being corrected based on chest radiography. Additional radiation exposure after the placement of central venous catheters can be avoided with the correct interpretation of standardized ultrasound windows, especially in vulnerable children with cardiac disease.

A cross-sectional study on non-infectious dysfunction of hemodialysis cuffed catheter.

Dialysis cuffed catheter dysfunction results in inadequate dialysis, increased sepsis risk,and a shortenedcatheter life. It may be possible to prolong catheter function by identifying the causes of cuffed catheter dysfunction. This study was a cross-sectional descriptive study conducted in 2021-2022 on hemodialysis patients with jugular cuff catheters. The catheterizations were performed using the Seldinger technique and were confirmed by fluoroscopy. A 12-month follow-up was conducted with respect to the performance of the cuffed catheter. A total of 123 patients underwent hemodialysis over 2 years via a cuffed catheter. Catheters were most commonly inserted into the right internal jugular vein, with lengths of 19 cm (tip to cuff). The rate of dysfunction of cuffed catheters was 27.6%. Catheter-related thrombosis was the most common cause in 10 cases (29.4%), followed by catheter tip fibrin sheath in 8 cases (23.5%) and catheter tip malposition in 8 cases (23.5%). Furthermore, 18 patients (52.94%) of cuffed catheter dysfunction occurred within 3 months of catheter placement, based on our study. The dysfunction of cuffed catheters on the left side 23 (67.64%) is more prevalent than the right side 11 (32.35%) (P=0.043); the malposition of catheter tips is more prevalent on the left side (P=0.023). Most commonly, cuffed catheter dysfunction is caused by thrombosis, fibrin sheath formation, and catheter tip malposition. Cuffed catheter failure can be reduced by carefully monitoring the catheter's path and tip position, searching for fibrin sheaths when investigating cuffed catheter failure, and preventing thrombotic events.

The value of transthoracic echocardiography and chest X-ray in locating the tip of central venous catheter in dialysis patients: a comparative study with computed tomography imaging

To determine the tip position of the central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with dialysis, the guidelines recommend that it be determined using chest radiography (CXR) after catheterization, without fluoroscopy. However, some researchers have proposed that transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) can replace CXR, but this has not been widely adopted. This study aimed to determine which of the two aforementioned methods is more suitable for locating the tip position of the CVC. This prospective study included 160 patients who underwent hemodialysis at our hospital from March 2021 to December 2022. After inserting the CVC through the internal jugular vein, we used transthoracic echocardiography and CXR to determine the tip of the CVC and compared the results with those of computed tomography (CT). In the comparison between TTE and CXR for locating the CVC tip, we obtained three main findings. (1) TTE was associated with fewer misdiagnosed cases than CXR. (2) TTE provided higher sensitivity (similar sensitivity in position 2), specificity, positive/negative predictive values, and accuracy than CXR. (3) When comparing the receiver operating characteristic curves of TTE and CXR, the area under the curve (95% confidence interval) for the former was larger. Additionally, we made anatomical discoveries: the "hyperechoic triangle" recognized by TTE was equivalent to the entrance of the superior vena cava into the right atrium shown by transesophageal transthoracic echocardiography. TTE is more suitable than CXR as the first examination for CVC tip localization, as it improves diagnostic accuracy and reduces X-ray radiation damage.

Development and validation of an updated PICC length prediction formula based on anteroposterior chest radiographs for the ultrasound-guided bedside placement.

Bedside peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement is sometimes required when the patient's intrahospital transport is restricted, and the ideal catheter length prediction is needed. This study aimed to develop an updated formula that predicts the optimal length of a PICC based on anteroposterior chest radiographs (AP-CXRs). This retrospective study collected PICC procedure data as the training and validation sets in three hospitals, including cubital crease-puncture point distance (CP), the actual PICC length (aCL), and the approach side. Horizontal and vertical measurement variables were set on the AP-CXRs. Two dependent variables were ipsilateral upper arm length (AL) and ideal truncal catheter length (iTCL). Simple and multiple regression analyses were used for formula development, and it was applied to the test set to evaluate the length prediction performance. The study included 309 patients in the training and validation sets and 91 intensive care patients in the test set. The final derived formula was: (AL + iTCL = CP + estimated PICC length, cm) = 19.831 - 0.062 × (contralateral clavicle length, cm) + 0.255 × (2nd ribs horizontal distance, cm) + 0.720 × (humero-vertebral distance, cm) + 0.761 × (thoraco-carinal distance, cm) + 1.024 × (the vertical distance of two vertebral body units, cm). (If approaching from the left, add 2.843cm, and if female, subtract 0.821cm.) In the test set, there was no case of length prediction failure. Moreover, the catheter tip position was evaluated as optimal in 82 cases (90.1%). This study's results suggest an updated formula to predict the ideal PICC length using only AP-CXRs for bedside placement.

Does Final Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Tip Position Predict Early Catheter Dysfunction?

Does Final Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Tip Position Predict Early Catheter Dysfunction?

Umbilical Venous Catheter Position: The Value of Acquiring a Lateral in Addition to a Frontal Chest Radiograph.

Introduction Umbilical venous catheters (UVCs) are standardly used for central venous access in acutely sick neonates. Complications associated with UVCs include thrombosis, infection, diffuse intravascular coagulopathy, arrhythmia, tamponade, and liver injury, many of which are related to misplacement of the catheters. Therefore, this study aimed to institute a policy of obtaining lateral and frontal radiographs to improve the determination of the UVC position. Methods We retrospectively reviewed UVC placement from 132 radiographs. We compared interpretations by different reviewers of frontal versus frontal and lateral chest radiographs for the most accurate determination of the UVC position. The reviewers completed questionnaires indicating their assessment of the catheter tip position, as well as the appropriate catheter manipulation required for optimal positioning. Their assessment was derived from frontal chest radiographs followed by frontal plus lateral view radiographs a week later. Results The reviewers (junior neonatology fellow, senior neonatology fellow, pediatric radiology fellow, and senior pediatric radiologist) revised their assessment with regard to the UVC positioning between frontal and frontal plus lateral radiographs in 24.6%, 22.7%, 19.6%, and 15.9% of cases, respectively, and indicated that the lateral view was helpful in 18%, 13.6%, 19.6%, and 31% of the cases, respectively. UVCs were placed appropriately at the first attempt in only 13.6% of the cases. Conclusion Correct initial placement of a UVC is uncommon. A lateral radiograph is beneficial in determining the UVC position. Hence, we suggest the inclusion of a lateral view along with the frontal chest radiograph for the evaluation of the UVC position if real-time ultrasound cannot be performed before UVC usage.