Portable Navigation Device Research Articles

Micro Electromechanical System Navigation Assists Femoral Extramedullary Alignment Osteotomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Single-Blind Randomizing Study.

A micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) was developed based on spatial alignment and navigation technology to assist femoral extramedullary alignment osteotomy (FEAO) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The system can locate and adjust the femoral distal condylar osteotomy (FDCO) to obtain a better femoral prosthesis placement. It is a portable navigation device and provides an innovative approach for FDCO. Sixty patients who suffered from severe knee osteoarthritis who underwent unilateral TKA from May 14, 2021 to May 30, 2022 were randomly divided into a MEMS-FEAO group and a conventional femoral intramedullary alignment osteotomy (FIAO) group, with 30 cases in each group for a controlled retrospective study. The hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA) of the lower limb was measured before and after surgery, the femoral valgus angle (FVA) was measured preoperatively, and the femoral prosthesis valgus angle (FPVA) and the femoral prosthesis flexion angle (FPFA) were measured postoperatively following computed tomography imaging protocols. Measurement data is statistically described as mean ± standard deviation c. The count data is described by frequency (constituent ratio) using the rank sum test. A total of 6.7% (2/30) of FEAO compared to 20.0% (6/30) of FIAO cases were postoperative deviations where the HKAA exceeded ±3° of neutral alignment (p < 0.05). The postoperative HKAA was 178.74° ± 1.56° versus 176.64° ± 3.39° (p < 0.05), the HKAA deviation was 1.25° ± 1.56° versus 3.36° ± 3.40° (p < 0.05), and the FPFA was 4.85° ± 2.46° versus 6.60° ± 1.86°(p < 0.05). Therefore, the differences were all statistically significant between the two groups. However, the FPVA was -0.59° ± 2.73° versus -0.80° ± 2.85° (p > 0.05), and there was no statistical significance between the two groups. The MEMS-FEAO system can improve the accurate alignment and can be utilized as a locator to obtain the best femoral prosthesis placement in TKA and significantly reduce the rate of poor force line of the lower limb.

An accelerometer-based navigation did not improve the femoral component positioning compared to a modified conventional technique of pre-operatively planned placement of intramedullary rod in total knee arthroplasty.

Although the most commonly used method of femoral component alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is intramedullary (IM) guides, this method demonstrated a limited degree of accuracy. Because of the femoral anterior bowing, the tip of the guide rod will impinge on the anterior cortex if a long rod is inserted. We hypothesized that the pre-operative planned insertion depth of the rod could increase the accuracy of the femoral component positioning in conventional TKA (modified conventional technique). Accelerometer-based, portable navigation device has been postulated to have better accuracy than conventional TKA in component positioning. The purpose of this study was to compare the post-operative femoral component alignment of TKA using the modified conventional technique with the accelerometer-based navigation. Fifty-five knees underwent TKA using the modified conventional technique and femoral component positioning was compared with 55 knees performed using the accelerometer-based navigation device. The femoral component alignment was evaluated with a CT-based three-dimensional software. The mean absolute deviation from targeted alignment in the sagittal plane was significantly less in the modified conventional cohort than in the accelerometer-based navigation cohort (1.1° vs 2.6°, P < 0.001). In the modified conventional cohort, 96.4% had an alignment within 3° of a targeted angle in the coronal plane (vs 89.1% with the accelerometer-based navigation, P = 0.14), and 96.4% in the sagittal plane (vs 74.5% with the accelerometer-based navigation, P < 0.001). The modified conventional technique is a simple and equal to or more accurate method than the accelerometer-based navigation in positioning the femoral component in TKA at a mid-volume hospital.

Similar radiological results with accelerometer-based navigation versus conventional technique in total knee arthroplasty

The Zimmer iASSIST system is an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) that does not require the use of a large console for alignment feedback as required in computer-assisted surgery. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of the accelerometer-based system in component positioning and overall mechanical alignment. Two groups of 30 patients each with primary osteoarthritis underwent TKA using either conventional method or Zimmer iASSIST navigation in 2013 was retrospectively studied. Patients were matched according to body mass index (BMI), gender and age. A senior arthroplasty surgeon performed all the operation using the same surgical approach. Perioperative and post-operative regimens were the same. All patients had standardized radiographs performed post-operatively to determine the lower limb mechanical alignment and component placement. There was no difference between the two groups for age, BMI, gender, side of operated knee and preoperative mechanical axis ( p > 0.05). There was no difference in the proportion of outliers for mechanical axis ( p = 0.38), coronal femoral angle ( p = 0.50), coronal tibia angle ( p = 0.11), sagittal femoral angle ( p = 0.28) and sagittal tibia angle ( p = 0.33). The duration of surgery, post-operative drop in haemoglobin level and transfusion incidence did not show statistically significant differences between the two groups ( p > 0.05). Our article showed that iASSIST was safe and remains a useful tool to restore mechanical axis. However, our data demonstrated no difference in lower limb alignment and component placement between the TKA that used accelerometer-based system and those that underwent conventional method.

Radiographic assessment and clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device.

It has been reported that an accelerometer-based portable navigation device can achieve accurate bone cuts, but there have been few studies of clinical outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using such a device. The aim of this study was to evaluate lower limb alignment and clinical outcomes after TKA using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device. Thirty-five patients (40 knees) underwent primary TKAs using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device. Postoperative radiographic assessments included the hip-knee-ankle angle, femoral component angle (FCA), and tibial component angle (TCA) in the coronal plane and the sagittal FCA and sagittal TCA in the sagittal plane. Clinical outcomes were evaluated by the Japanese Orthopedic Association score for osteoarthritic knees, Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure, and the New Knee Society Score. The frequency of outliers (>3 degrees) was 10% for the hip-knee-ankle angle, 8% for FCA, 0% for TCA, 19% for sagittal FCA, and 9% for sagittal TCA. The Japanese Orthopedic Association score and Japanese Knee Osteoarthritis Measure were significantly improved postoperatively. The postoperative New Knee Society Score was 67.2% for symptoms, 50.3% for satisfaction, 58.6% for expectation, and 44.1% for function. TKA using an accelerometer-based portable navigation device achieved good results for both lower limb alignment and clinical outcomes.

The accuracy of portable navigation device HipAlign and image-free navigation system in total hip arthroplasty in a lateral decubitus position

The accuracy of portable navigation device HipAlign and image-free navigation system in total hip arthroplasty in a lateral decubitus position

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Distal Femoral Cutting Using a Portable Navigation Device in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Evaluation of the Accuracy of Distal Femoral Cutting Using a Portable Navigation Device in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Accelerometer-Based, Portable Navigation (KneeAlign) vs Conventional Instrumentation for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Comparative Trial

BackgroundAccelerometer-based, portable navigation devices have been introduced as a less invasive and simpler technique to perform navigated surgical implantation of knee prostheses. They have been postulated to have better accuracy than conventional instruments in restoration of alignment in total knee arthroplasty. MethodsA total of 190 patients were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial and underwent total knee arthroplasty using either the KneeAlign or conventional guides. Multiplanar alignment was evaluated with a CT imaging protocol. ResultsA total of 86.5% of portable navigation device and 82.2% of conventional group had a postoperative hip–knee angle within 3° of neutral alignment (P = .54). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups for component coronal and sagittal plane alignment. Portable navigation device did not significantly increase the time to perform the surgery. ConclusionPortable navigation device demonstrates accurate restoration of alignment; however, there was no statistically significant difference when compared with conventional guides.

Reduction of GPS Latency Using RTK GPS/GNSS Correction and Map Matching in a Car NavigationSystem

The difference between definition time of GPS (Global Positioning System) position data and actual display time of car positions on a map could reduce the accuracy of car positions displayed in PND (Portable Navigation Device)-type CNS (Car Navigation System). Due to the time difference, the position of the car displayed on the map is not its current position, so an improved method to fix these problems is required. It is expected that a method that uses predicted future positionsto compensate for the delay caused by processing and display of the received GPS signals could mitigate these problems. Therefore, in this study an analysis was conducted tocorrect late processing problems of map positions by mapmatching using a Kalman filter with only GPS position data anda RRF (Road Reduction Filter) technique in a light-weight CNS. The effects on routing services are examined by analyzing differences that are decomposed into along and across the road elements relative to the direction of advancing car. The results indicate that it is possible to improve the positional accuracy in the along-the-road direction of a light-weight CNS device that uses only GPS position data, by applying a Kalman filter and RRF.

Handheld Navigation Device and Patient-Specific Cutting Guides Result in Similar Coronal Alignment for Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: a Retrospective Matched Cohort Study.

Proper alignment of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is essential for TKA function and may reduce the risk of aseptic failure. Technologies that prevent malalignment may reduce the risk of revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare two competing TKA systems that purport improved alignment: patient-specific instrumentation (PSI), and a handheld portable navigation device (NAV). After IRB approval, 49 consecutive PSI TKAs (40 patients) were matched based on preoperative characteristics to 49 NAV TKAs (40 patients) performed by a single surgeon. A blinded observer measured alignment on digital radiographs. Operating room records were reviewed for procedure times. Two-tailed paired sample t tests and McNemar's test were used as appropriate. Alpha level was 0.05 for all tests. Preoperative cohort characteristics were not different. Mean postoperative long-leg mechanical alignment was within ±1° of neutral for both groups, although statistically different (p = 0.026). There were no other significant differences in coronal alignment. PSI exhibited significantly greater posterior tibial slope (4.4°) compared to NAV (2.7°) (p = 0.004); PSI resulted in significantly more outliers (>6°; p = 0.004). Procedure time for unilateral TKAs was lower for PSI (74.4min) compared to that for NAV (80.6min; p = 0.023). NAV and PSI technologies provided excellent coronal plane alignment. NAV was better for sagittal tibial slope, while PSI procedure times were shorter for unilateral TKA. The impact of these technologies on patient-reported outcomes and TKA survivorship is controversial and should be the focus of future research.

Radiological Outcomes and Operative Time following Total Knee Arthroplasty using Accelerometer-based, Portable Navigation versus Conventional Inter-Medullary Alignment Guides

Objectives:Accelerometer-based, portable navigation instrumentation is a new method of achieving desired resection alignments in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).Methods:After randomisation and the application of exclusion criteria, 79 knees were analysed. 42 patients which underwent TKA using conventional intra-medullary (IM) alignment guides were compared to 37 patients with the use of accelerometer-based, portable navigation device (KneeAlign; OrthoAlign Inc, Aliso Viejo, California). Radiographic results were obtained from post-operative computer-tomography following the CT Perth Protocol.Results:In the IM cohort, 81.0% of patients had a coronal alignment within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis (vs 83.8% with KneeAlign, p=0.74), 81.0% had a femoral coronal alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis (vs 89.2% with KneeAlign, p=0.31), and 92.9% had a tibial coronal alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the tibial mechanical axis (vs 81.1% with KneeAlign, p=0.12). Regarding sagittal alignment, the IM cohort had 90.5% of patients with femoral component alignment within 2° of optimum (vs 91.9% with KneeAlign, p=0.83) and 92.9% had a tibial component alignment within 2° of the optimal tibial slope (vs 89.2% with KneeAlign, p=0.57). The mean tourniquet time (from incision to completion of coronal bone resections) in the IM cohort was 16.5± 8.9 minutes vs 22.2 ± 7.6 minutes in the KneeAlign cohort (p<0.003).Conclusion:Accelerometer-based, portable navigation has a statistically similar outcome in alignment following TKA as IM guides. It is noted that using the portable navigation device does prolong surgical time compared to conventional IM surgery and this may be due to the learning curve.

A Novel Method of Vehicle Trajectory Estimation with Portable Navigation Device for Dense Urban Environments

A Novel Method of Vehicle Trajectory Estimation with Portable Navigation Device for Dense Urban Environments

An Efficient Portable Navigation Device with GPS and BDS Positioning Capabilities

An Efficient Portable Navigation Device with GPS and BDS Positioning Capabilities

Accelerometer-Based, Portable Navigation vs Imageless, Large-Console Computer-Assisted Navigation in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Radiographic Results

Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) systems improve alignment accuracy in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) but have not been widely implemented. Eighty knees underwent TKA using an accelerometer-based, portable navigation device (KneeAlign 2; OrthAlign Inc, Aliso Viejo, California), and the radiographic results were compared with 80 knees performed using a large-console, imageless CAS system (AchieveCAS; Smith and Nephew, Memphis, Tennessee). In the KneeAlign 2 cohort, 92.5% of patients had an alignment within 3° of a neutral mechanical axis (vs 86.3% with AchieveCAS, P < .01), 96.2% had a tibial component alignment within 2° of perpendicular to tibial mechanical axis (vs 97.5% with AchieveCAS, P = .8), and 94.9% had a femoral component alignment within 2° of perpendicular to the femoral mechanical axis (vs 92.5% with AchieveCAS, P < .01). The mean tourniquet time in the KneeAlign 2 cohort was 48.1 ± 10.2 minutes vs 54.1 ± 10.5 minutes in the AchieveCAS cohort (P < .01). Accelerometer-based, portable navigation is as accurate as large-console, imageless CAS systems in TKA.

Cadaveric analysis of an accelerometer-based portable navigation device for distal femoral cutting block alignment in total knee arthroplasty

Femoral intramedullary guides have been shown to be insufficiently accurate in creating a distal femoral resection perpendicular to the mechanical axis in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), as they make assumptions regarding the difference between the patient's femoral mechanical and anatomical angles. The aim of this cadaveric study was to validate the accuracy of a portable accelerometer-based navigation device for alignment of the distal femoral cutting block in TKA. Twenty-nine trials were performed on five cadaveric specimens (hip-to-ankle), in which the distal femoral cutting block was placed using the KneeAlign 2™ navigation device. For each specimen, a preoperative “target” was assigned for varus/valgus and flexion/extension alignment of the cutting block. The actual alignment of each cutting block was then measured using the ORTHOsoft Computer Assisted Surgery (CAS) system. The mean absolute difference between the preoperative target and the alignment of the cutting block was 0.83 ± 0.60° for varus/valgus, and 0.83 ± 0.83° for flexion/extension. The KneeAlign 2™ navigation device can set and align the distal femoral resection guide with the same accuracy as a large-console CAS system, thus demonstrating that portable accelerometer-based navigation can be used reliably in total knee arthroplasty.

P‐43: Portable Navigation Device with Head‐Up Display Unit

AbstractNavigation device becomes more and more popular in a vehicle on the road, and head‐up display (HUD) is the most suitable visual interface in terms of safety consideration. A compact HUD unit with navigation module inside has been proposed and built mainly for improving driving safety while the driver is trying to operate navigation functions. This 90mm (W) × 67mm (H) × 150mm (D) unit provides 65,536 (16 bits per pixel) colors image and QVGA resolution is demonstrated which is available for displaying a wide range of information for vehicle application.

Field Comparison of Driving Performance Using a Portable Navigation System

Recent work has revealed that increasing numbers of drivers now receive driving instructions using a portable navigation system. A 2×2×2 (position×display decrease mode×voice) factorial experiment was executed to compare driving performance when using a portable navigation system (PNS). Thirty-two subjects were paid to participate in this field study, and a smart phone was adopted as the portable navigation device. The results indicated that drivers using the PNS under the conditions up position and with voice instruction performed better in terms of trip duration, mean speed, and the standard deviation of speed.