Population-based Propensity Score Matching Analysis Research Articles

Comparison of prognosis between oncocytic thyroid carcinoma and follicular thyroid carcinoma: a population-based propensity score matching analysis.

Oncocytic thyroid carcinoma (OTC) is a rare subtype of thyroid cancer known for its distinctive morphology and high likelihood of recurrence, setting it apart from follicular thyroid carcinoma (FTC). Despite this, there is limited research comparing the clinicopathological characteristics and outcomes of OTC and FTC. We retrospectively searched through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results (SEER) database (2004-2015) for histologically diagnosed OTC and FTC patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis, propensity score matching (PSM), univariate Cox proportional risk regression model, and subgroup analysis were employed to investigate the prognostic effect of clinicopathological features and treatment regimens on survival outcomes of OTC and FTC patients. 2329 OTC patients and 5679 FTC patients were included in the study. OTC patients were prone to older age, white race, lymph node metastasis, distal metastasis, extension and multiple primary tumors compared with FTC patients. After using a 1:1 PSM matching ratio, there were no significant differences in demographic and clinicopathological characteristics between the matched groups. Further Cox regression analysis showed that OTC patients had lower overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in contrast with FTC patients. Subgroup survival analysis suggested that the OTC patients were related to lower OS in subgroups including those over 55years old, male sex, white ethnicity, extrathyroidal extension, single primary tumor, surgery and without chemotherapy compared with the FTC patients in these subgroups. In addition, the OTC patients were connected with lower CSS in subgroups including male sex, white ethnicity, married status, tumor size is less than 20mm or more than 40mm, N0 stage, localized stage, single primary tumor, surgery, radiotherapy, and without chemotherapy compared with the FTC patients in these subgroups. Meanwhile, the OTC patients had lower CSS compared to FTC patients regardless of age and extrathyroidal extension. The results suggested that OTC patients have unique clinical features and poorer prognoses compared to FTC patients. Surgical resection and radioactive iodine therapy are recommended for OTC patients and FTC patients. It is worth noting that the prognosis of OTC relies largely on the selection of treatment strategies. Therefore, our results highlighted the clinical significance of the early distinguishment and the correct choice of treatment in OTC patients.

Upfront versus deferred cytoreductive nephrectomy following targeted or immunotherapy: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis of perioperative complications.

To evaluate the incidence of postoperative complications after cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) following first-line treatment for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), and to compare it with postoperative complications of upfront CN. For this population-based retrospective study, the PearlDiver Mariner database (PearlDiver Technologies, Colorado Springs, CO), a database of insurance billing records was analyzed. Using relevant ICD-9/10 and CPT codes, patients diagnosed with mRCC between 2011 and 2021, who received first-line systemic molecular therapy (SMT), either tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) or immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), were identified. The selected population was stratified into two cohorts according to the timing of CN (deferred: after SMT vs. upfront: before SMT). Propensity-score matching (PSM) was performed as per baseline patients' characteristics to control for potential confounders between the two cohorts. The primary outcome was to compare 30-day postoperative complications rate between patients undergoing upfront vs. deferred CN. After PSM, 162 patients who received upfront CN were compared with 162 patients who underwent deferred CN. The overall rate of 30-day postoperative complications was statistically significantly higher in patients undergoing deferred CN (33.9%), compared to patients treated with upfront CN (21%, p < 0.01). In addition, the rate of both medical (26.5% vs. 14.2%, p < 0.01) and surgical (14.8 vs. 7.4%, p = 0.03) complication rate was statistically significantly higher in deferred vs. upfront CN. Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that none of the treatment regimens significantly predicted the occurrence of postoperative complications. Patients undergoing deferred CN experience a higher rates of overall, medical, and surgical 30-day postoperative complications compared to those receiving upfront surgery. Findings from this study should be interpreted within the limitations of this type of analysis.

Malnutrition and the Post-Acute Sequelae of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Multi-Institutional Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), has led to a global health crisis, exacerbating issues like malnutrition due to increased metabolic demands and reduced intake during illness. Malnutrition, a significant risk factor, is linked to worse outcomes in patients with COVID-19, such as increased mortality and extended hospital stays. This retrospective cohort study investigated the relationship between malnutrition and clinical outcomes within 90-180 days using data obtained from the TriNetX database. Patients aged >18 years diagnosed with COVID-19 between 1 January 2022, and 31 March 2024 were enrolled in the study. The propensity score-matching (PSM) method was used to match patients with malnutrition (malnutrition group) and those without malnutrition (control group). The primary composite outcome was the cumulative hazard ratio (HR) for post-COVID-19 condition, all-cause hospitalization, and all-cause mortality between 90 days and 180 days after COVID-19 diagnosis. The secondary outcomes were the individual components of the primary outcomes. Two cohorts, each consisting of 15,004 patients with balanced baseline characteristics, were identified using PSM. During the 90-180-day follow-up period, the malnutrition group exhibited a higher incidence of all-cause hospitalization, mortality, or post-COVID-19 condition (HR = 2.315, 95% confidence interval: 2.170-2.471, p < 0.0001). Compared with patients with COVID-19 without malnutrition, those with malnutrition may be associated with a higher risk of adverse clinical outcomes.

A population-based propensity score matching analysis of risk factors and the impact on survival associated with refusal of cancer-directed surgery in patients with prostate cancer

Cancer-directed surgeries (CDS) play a crucial role in prostate cancer (PCa) management along with possible survival and therapeutic benefits. However, barriers such as socioeconomic factors may affect patients’ decision of refusing recommended CDS. This study aimed to uncover risk factors and the impact on survival associated with CDS refusal. We retrospectively reviewed the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients diagnosed with PCa between 2000 and 2019. Multiple sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were extracted to assess predictors for physicians’ surgical recommendations and patients’ surgical refusal, respectively. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the covariates. The impact of surgical refusal on mortality risk was also investigated. A total of 185,540 patients were included. The physician’s recommendation of CDS was significantly influenced by the patient’s age, race, income, home location, diagnosis year, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and TNM stage. About 5.6% PCa patients refused CDS, most of whom were older, non-White race, lack of partners, living outside of metropolitan areas, with higher PSA or lower clinical TNM stage. Patients who refused CDS had an increased risk of cancer-specific mortality and overall mortality than those who performed CDS. Physicians may weigh a host of sociodemographic and clinical factors prior to making a CDS recommendation. Patients’ refusal of recommended CDS affected survival and was potentially modifiable by certain sociodemographic factors. Physicians should fully consider the hindrances behind patients’ CDS refusal to improve patient-doctor shared decision-making, guide patients toward the best alternative and achieve better outcomes.

Disparities in Coronavirus Disease 2019 Clinical Outcomes and Vaccination Coverage Among Migrants With Human Immunodeficiency Virus in the PISCIS Cohort: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) disproportionately affects migrants and ethnic minorities, including those with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Comprehensive studies are needed to understand the impact and risk factors. Using data from the PISCIS cohort of people with HIV (PWH) in Catalonia, Spain, we investigated COVID-19 outcomes and vaccination coverage. Among 10 640 PWH we compared migrants and non-migrants assessing rates of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing, diagnosis, and associated clinical outcomes through propensity score matching and multivariable Cox regression. The cohort (mean age, 43 years; 83.5% male) included 57.4% (3053) Latin American migrants. Migrants with HIV (MWH) had fewer SARS-CoV-2 tests (67.8% vs 72.1%, P < .0001) but similar COVID-19 diagnoses (29.2% vs 29.4%, P = .847) compared to Spanish natives. Migrants had lower complete vaccination (78.9% vs 85.1%, P < .0001) and booster doses (63.0% vs 65.5%, P = .027). COVID-19 hospitalizations (8.1% vs 5.1%, P < .0001) and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions (2.9% vs 1.2%, P < .0001) were higher among migrants, with similar hospitalization duration (5.5 vs 4.0 days, P = .098) and mortality (3 [0.2%] vs 6 [0.4%], P = .510). Age ≥40 years, CD4 counts <200 cells/μL, ≥2 comorbidities, and incomplete/nonreception of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine increased the risk of severe COVID-19 among migrants. MWH had lower rates of SARS-CoV-2 testing and vaccination coverage, although the rates of COVID-19 diagnosis were similar between migrants and non-migrants. Rates of COVID-19-associated hospitalizations and ICU admissions were higher among migrants in comparison with non-migrants, with similar hospitalization duration and mortality. These findings can inform policies to address disparities in future pandemic responses for MWH.

Comparison of post-hepatectomy long-term survival outcome between non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine and colorectal liver metastases: A population-based propensity-score matching analysis

BackgroundHepatectomy is an established treatment for colorectal liver metastasis (CLM) or neuroendocrine liver metastasis. However, its role in non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastasis (NCNNLM) is controversial. This study aims to compare long-term survival outcomes after hepatectomy between NCNNLM and CLM in a population-based cohort. MethodsFrom 2009 to 2018, curative hepatectomy were performed in 964 patients with NCNNLM (n ​= ​133) or CLM (n ​= ​831). Propensity score (PS) matching was performed. Short-term and long-term outcomes were compared between PS-matched groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify prognostic factors affecting survival. ResultsThere were 133 patients in the NCNNLM group and 266 patients in the CLM group. The mortality (1.5 ​% vs 1.5 ​%) and morbidity (19.5 ​% vs 20.3 ​%) rates were comparable between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year overall (48.9 ​% vs 39.8 ​%) and recurrence-free (25.1 ​% vs 23.4 ​%) survival rates between NCNNLM and CLM groups. A high pre-operative serum bilirubin level, severe postoperative complications and multiple tumors were independent prognostic factors for poor survival. ConclusionHepatectomy for selected patients with NCNNLM can achieve similar long-term oncological outcomes as those with CLM. High serum bilirubin, severe postoperative complication and multiple tumors are poor prognostic factors for survival.

Clinical characteristic-assisted surgical benefit stratification for resection of primary tumor in patients with advanced primary malignant bone neoplasms: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis.

Primary tumor resection (PTR) is the standard treatment for patients with primary malignant bone neoplasms (PMBNs). However, it remains unclear whether patients with advanced PMBNs still benefit from PTR. This study aimed to develop a prediction model to estimate the beneficial probability of PTR for this population. This study extracted data from patients diagnosed with advanced PMBNs, as recorded in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, with the period from 2004 to 2015. The patient cohort was then bifurcated into two groups: those who underwent surgical procedures and the non-surgery group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was utilized to mitigate any confounding factors in the study. The survival rates of patients from both the surgical and non-surgery groups were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (K-M) curves analysis. Moreover, the study used this method to assess the capacity of the nomogram to distinguish patients likely to derive benefits from surgical intervention. The study was grounded in the hypothesis that patients who underwent PTR and survived beyond the median overall survival (OS) time would potentially benefit from the surgery. Subsequently, logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain significant predictors, facilitating the development of a nomogram. This nomogram was subjected to both internal and external validation using receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve analysis, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis. The SEER database provided a total of 839 eligible patients for the study, among which 536 (63.9%) underwent PTR. Following a 2:1 PSM analysis, patients were classified into two groups: 364 patients in the surgery group and 182 patients in the non-surgery group. Both K-M curves and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that patients who received PTR had a longer survival duration, observed both before and after PSM. Crucial factors such as age, M stage, and tumor size were identified to be significantly correlated with surgical benefits in patients with advanced PMBNs. Subsequently, a nomogram was developed that uses these independent predictors. The validation of this predictive model confirmed its high accuracy and excellent discrimination ability of the nomogram to distinguish patients who would most likely benefit from surgical intervention. In this study, we devised a user-friendly nomogram to forecast the likehood of surgical benefits for patients diagnosed with advanced PMBNs. This tool facilitates the identification of the most suitable candidates for PTR, thus promoting more discerning and effective use of surgical intervention in this patient population.

Association of chemotherapy and comorbidities with overall survival in elderly patients with early breast cancer: a French population-based propensity score-matched analysis.

Additional systemic treatment for early breast cancer in elderly is challenged by increasing comorbidities with age. We aimed to examine the effect of additional chemotherapy on overall survival in patients aged 70years or older and the impact of comorbidities on chemotherapy benefit. This retrospective monocentric cohort study includes data from all patients aged 70years and older who underwent surgery for an early breast cancer from 1997 to 2016. A propensity score analysis allowed adjustment for chemotherapy prescription preferences based on tumour characteristics. Of 15,599 patients who had surgery for an early breast cancer, 1743 (11.2%) over 70years old were included, of whom 269 (15.4%) had received additional chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 5.3years. Multivariate analyses on the propensity-score weighted cohort (n = 1 354) identified improved overall survival in patients with chemotherapy versus without (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.31-0.92). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 2.16, 95% CI 1.40-3.34) and polypharmacy (HR 1.40, 95%CI 1.07-1.84) were associated with worse overall survival. No statistically significant interactions were identified between these comorbidities and chemotherapy prescription. Additional chemotherapy in elderly with early breast cancer is feasible and associated with overall survival benefit, supporting the importance of chemotherapy considerations in this population, and of avoiding undertreatment based on chronological age considerations alone.

Antenatal corticosteroids and outcomes of small for gestational age infants born at 24-31 gestational weeks: a population-based propensity score matching analysis.

To evaluate the effect of antenatal corticosteroid (ACS) treatment on neonatal outcomes in small for gestational age (SGA) infants born at 24-31 gestational weeks compared with non-SGA infants. A population-based retrospective study was conducted that analyzed clinical data from the Neonatal Research Network of Japan database, which enrolls neonates born at < 32 gestational weeks and weighing 1500g or less (n = 22,414). Propensity score matching (with the ratio of ACS to no-ACS groups of 1:1) was performed in SGA (n = 7028) and non-SGA (n = 15,386) infants, respectively. Univariate logistic and interaction analyses were performed to compare the short-term neonatal outcomes of infants with and without ACS treatment in utero. In the SGA and non-SGA infants, ACS treatment significantly reduced in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 0.67 95% confidence interval [0.50-0.88] and 0.62 [0.50-0.78], respectively), respiratory distress syndrome (0.77 [0.69-0.87] and 0.63 [0.58-0.68], respectively), and composite adverse outcomes (0.73 [0.58-0.91] and 0.57 [0.50-0.65], respectively). ACS treatment also significantly reduced intraventricular hemorrhage (grade III/IV), periventricular leukomalacia, and sepsis in the non-SGA infants, but not in the SGA infants. However, interaction analyses revealed no significant differences between the SGA and non-SGA infants in the efficacy of ACS treatment on short-term outcomes except for respiratory distress syndrome. ACS treatment was associated with beneficial effects on mortality, respiratory distress syndrome, and adverse composite outcomes in extremely and very preterm SGA infants, with similar efficacy on all neonatal outcomes except for respiratory distress syndrome observed in the non-SGA infants.

Prognostic significance of examined lymph node count in older patients with stage T1N0M0 pulmonary carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis.

The optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELNs) for older early-stage pulmonary carcinoid tumour (PC) patients is unknown. To explore the prognostic effect of the ELN count in older patients with stage T1N0M0 PC resection. Clinical data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database on stage T1N0M0 PC older patients (age ≥ 65years) who underwent sublobar resection and lobectomy between 2000 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed for two ELNs-stratified (≥ 7 vs. < 7 ELNs) propensity score-matched (PSM) groups. Overall survival (OS) was calculated and compared with Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test, respectively, and the independent prognostic factors were estimated using a Cox proportional hazard model. Among 1077 participants (median dissected LN 4; mean ELNs 6.19 ± 7.04), 393 (36.49%) in the ≥ 7 ELNs group had better 5- and 10-year OS than the < 7 ELNs group (before PSM: 5-year OS = 93.01 vs. 85.22%, 10-year OS = 72.38 vs. 58.99%, p < 0.001; after PSM: 5-year OS = 93.12 vs. 85.97%, 10-year OS = 75.25 vs. 60.03%, p = 0.001). Subgroup analysis stratified by histologic type and surgical method showed a similar survival trend. Age-stratified analysis showed that, compared with the < 7 ELNs group, the ≥ 7 ELNs group had better 5- and 10-year OS but only better 5-year OS in participants > 75years. Compared with the < 7 ELNs group, subgroup analysis by tumour size showed superior OS with 1.1-3.0cm tumours in the ≥ 7 ELNs group, but no significant intergroup difference with tumours < 1.0cm. Multivariate Cox analysis showed ≥ 7 ELNs was associated with improved OS. Higher ELNs correlated with increased long-term survival in older early‑stage PC patients, and a minimum of 7 ELNs are recommended for prognostication in these patients (especially those aged 65-75years, with tumour size 1.1-3.0cm).

Squamous cell carcinoma predicts worse prognosis than adenocarcinoma in stage IA lung cancer patients: A population-based propensity score matching analysis.

BackgroundAlthough numerous studies have reported the association between histological types and the prognosis of IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, few studies have deeply investigated the impact of pathology on the outcome of NSCLC patients. In this study, we comprehensively explored whether the type of histology influenced the outcome of IA-stage NSCLC patients.MethodsThe study population was obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, which is supported by the National Cancer Institute of the United States. To avoid potential bias, the method of propensity score matching (PSM) was used to obtain a balanced cohort for further analysis.ResultsThe results from univariate and multivariate regression models showed that lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSQCC) patients were at a significantly greater risk of undergoing shorter overall survival (OS) and lung cancer–specific survival (LCSS). After PSM analysis, LSQCC was still closely associated with a reduction in OS and LCSS. All of these suggested that the histological type was an independent prognostic factor for OS and LCSS.ConclusionOur study demonstrated that squamous cell carcinoma predicted worse OS and LCSS in IA-stage NSCLC patients compared with lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). We suggest that the outcomes of LSQCC and LUAD are very different and that the two histological types should be differently analyzed.

Selection of the surgical approach for patients with cStage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based propensity score matching analysis.

BackgroundThis study aimed to conduct a comparative analysis of the survival rates after segmentectomy, wedge resection, or lobectomy in patients with cStage IA lung squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).MethodsWe enrolled 4,316 patients who had cStage IA lung SCC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Cox proportional hazards model was conducted to recognize the potential risk factors for overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS). To eliminate potential biases of included patients, the propensity score matching (PSM) method was used. OS and LCSS rates were compared among three groups stratified according to tumor size.ResultsKaplan–Meier analyses revealed no statistical differences in the rates of OS and LCSS between wedge resection (WR) and segmentectomy (SG) groups for patients who had cStage IA cancers. In patients with tumors ≤ 1 cm, LCSS favored lobectomy (Lob) compared to segmentectomy (SG), but a similar survival rate was obtained for wedge resection (WR) and lobectomy (Lob). For patients with tumors sized 1.1 to 2 cm, lobectomy had improved OS and LCSS rates compared to the segmentectomy or wedge resection groups, with the exception of a similar OS rate for lobectomy and segmentectomy. For tumors sized 2.1 to 3 cm, lobectomy had a higher rate of OS or LCSS than wedge resection or segmentectomy, except that lobectomy conferred a similar LCSS rate compared to segmentectomy. Multivariable analyses showed that patients aged ≥75 and tumor sizes of >2 to ≤3 cm were potential risk factors for OS and LCSS, while lobectomy and first malignant primary indicator were considered protective factors. The Cox proportional analysis also confirmed that male patients aged ≥65 to <75 were independent prognostic factors that are indicative of a worse OS rate.ConclusionsThe tumor size can influence the surgical procedure recommended for individuals with cStage IA lung SCC. For patients with tumors ≤1 cm, lobectomy is the recommended approach, and wedge resection or segmentectomy might be an alternative for those who cannot tolerate lobectomy if adequate surgical margin is achievable and enough nodes are sampled. For tumors >1 to ≤3 cm, lobectomy showed better survival outcomes than sublobar resection. Our findings require further validation by randomized controlled trial (RCT) or other evidence.

Survival benefit from axillary surgery in patients aged 70 years or older with clinically node-negative breast cancer: A population-based propensity-score matched analysis

BackgroundOlder patients with breast cancer have good prognosis and most die from diseases other than breast cancer. Previous studies suggested that the surgical extent in older patients could be reduced. We aimed to compare survival outcomes in patients aged ≥70 years with clinically node-negative breast cancer, based on whether axillary surgery was performed. MethodsA total of 2,995 patients with breast cancer aged ≥70 years who underwent breast surgery were included in the Korean Breast Cancer Registry. Patients were classified into two groups according to the performance of axillary surgery. We used propensity score matching for demographic and treatment factors to minimize selection bias. We compared the 5-year overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). ResultsAmong 708 patients after 3:1 propensity score matching, 531 underwent breast surgery with axillary surgery and 177 underwent breast surgery alone. Of all patients, 51.7% had T1 stage, and 73.2% underwent mastectomy. Approximately 31.2% of patients received chemotherapy. Among patients who did not undergo axillary surgery, the 5-year OS and BCSS rates were 85.2% and 96.7%, respectively. The hazard ratio of axillary surgery for OS was 0.943 (95% confidence interval 0.652–1.365, p = 0.757), indicating no significant difference between two groups. ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that axillary surgery in a matched cohort of older patients with breast cancer and clinically negative nodes does not provide a survival benefit compared to patients undergoing breast surgery alone. These findings suggest that axillary surgery may be safely omitted in a select group of patients aged ≥70 years with clinically node-negative cancer. Further studies are needed to identify potential candidates for omitting axillary surgery.

Mental health and wellbeing among people with informal caring responsibilities across different time points during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based propensity score matching analysis.

Due to a prolonged period of national and regional lockdown measures during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, there has been an increase reliance on informal care for informal carers. In light of this, the current study compared the experiences of carers and non-carers on various mental health and wellbeing measures across six key time points during the pandemic. Data analysed were from the University College London (UCL) COVID -19 Social Study. Our study focused on six time points in England: (1) the first national lockdown (March-April 2020); (2) the beginning of first lockdown rules easing (May 2020); (3) the second national lockdown (November 2020); (4) the third national lockdown (January 2021); (5) the easing of the third lockdown (March 2021); and (6) the end of restrictions (July-August 2021). We considered five mental health and wellbeing measures: depressive symptoms, anxiety symptoms, loneliness, life satisfaction, and sense of being worthwhile. Propensity score matching was applied for the analyses. We found that informal carers experienced higher levels of depressive and anxiety symptoms than non-carers across much of the pandemic. During the first national lockdown, carers also experienced a higher sense of life being worthwhile. No association was found between informal caring responsibilities and levels of loneliness and life satisfaction. Given that carers are an essential national healthcare support, especially during a pandemic, it is crucial to integrate carers' needs into healthcare planning and delivery. These results highlight that there is a pressing need to provide adequate and targeted mental health support for carers during and following this pandemic.

Sublobar resection versus lobectomy for patients with stage T1-2N0M0 pulmonary typical carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score matching analysis.

OBJECTIVESIt is widely accepted that surgical resection of localized pulmonary typical carcinoid (TC) tumours remains the primary curative modality. However, the optimal extent of resection remains controversial. This study aimed to investigate the survival rates of patients with stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours who underwent sublobar resection or lobectomy.METHODSWe queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for patients who underwent surgery after being diagnosed with stage T1-2N0M0 TCs from 2004 to 2016. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to equalize the baseline characteristics between the sublobar resection group and the lobectomy group. Kaplan–Meier analysis and the Cox proportional hazard model were performed for survival analysis.RESULTSOf the 2469 patients included, 658 (26.65%) underwent sublobar resection and 1811 (73.35%) underwent lobectomy. All 2469 patients were analysed with PSM and, following PSM, 812 patients were included in the final analysis and divided into 2 groups of 406 patients. In the matched cohort, Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated no significant difference in survival curves between the sublobar resection and lobectomy groups in patients with stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours [5-year overall survival (OS) = 90.78% vs 93.30%; hazard ratio 1.18, 95% confidence interval: 0.77–1.80; P = 0.505]. Subgroup analysis by tumour size showed that the sublobar resection group was identical to the lobectomy group in OS for tumours ≤3.0 cm. In addition, no difference in OS between surgical groups was observed in any subgroups. In the multivariable Cox analysis, age ≤65 years, female sex, married status and adequate lymph node assessment (≥5) were associated with improved OS, whereas the extent of resection was not.CONCLUSIONSSublobar resection seems to be associated with similar survival to lobectomy for stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours if lymph node assessment is performed adequately. This analysis suggests that sublobar resection should be considered an appropriate alternative for stage T1-2N0M0 TC tumours. However, further validations are needed in large, multicentre prospective studies.

Oncologic outcomes of fertility-sparing surgery in early stage epithelial ovarian cancer: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis.

To evaluate the safety of fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) in reproductive women (younger than 50years) with early epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Reproductive women diagnosed with stage I EOC in the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database were identified. Surgeries that did not undergo hysterectomy and/or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy were categorized as FSS, whereas non-FSS included bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomy. Propensity-score matching (PSM) was conducted to balance the covariates. Risk factor was identified by COX analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves were performed to evaluate the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). 3556 patients with stage I EOC were identified and divided into non-FSS group and FSS group. After PSM, 625 pairs of patients with stage I EOC were included. FSS was not inferior to non-FSS in the OS curve [HR 0.9127, 95% CI (0.6971 ~ 0.1.195), P = 0.5174; HR: 0.9378, 95% CI (0.6358 ~ 0.1.383), P = 0.7460] and the CSS curve [HR 0.8284, 95% CI (0.5932 ~ 1.157), P = 0.2949; HR 0.9003, 95% CI (0.5470 ~ 1.482), P = 0.6803] both in overall cohort and in matched cohort. Univariate COX analysis identified older age (45-49), moderate-differentiated to un-differentiation grade, IC stage, bigger tumor size (> 10cm) and chemotherapy as risk factors of prognostic outcome (P < 0.1). Not only in univariate subgroup analyses but also in bivariate factors subgroup analysis, the evidence was not enough to regard FSS as a harmful factor compared with non-FSS. Fertility-sparing surgery was comparable to non-FSS in terms of survival in reproductive women with stage I EOC. Patients with high-risk factors could also consider FSS as an effective alternative compared with non-FSS.

COVID-19 Infection and Incidence of Myocarditis: A Multi-Site Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BackgroundCardiovascular complications from COVID-19 include myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and others. Population-level data is lacking about the relationship between COVID-19 and cardiovascular complications; therefore, we conducted a study to examine the incidence of myocarditis, acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF) after COVID-19 infection.MethodsRetrospective cohort study using de-identified data from 50 health systems across the United States. Cohort groups were created using patients ≥18 who were admitted to hospitals for respiratory illness with COVID-19 in 2020 and respiratory illness without COVID-19 for 2020 and 2019. There were 107,699 patients with COVID-19, 77,499 patients with respiratory illness in 2020, and 112,898 patients in 2019. The COVID-19 group was matched to each respiratory illness group by propensity score. Patients with prior specific cardiovascular events such as myocarditis, AMI, HF were excluded. The primary outcome was myocarditis, and secondary outcomes were AMI and HF.ResultsIn the COVID-19 group, 79 (0.12%) patients had new-onset myocarditis compared to 29 (0.04%) patients in the non-COVID-19 control (Pneumonia/flu) group Odd's Ratio (OR), (OR 2.73, CI 95%, 1.78-4.18). In the COVID-19 group, 1512 patients developed HF compared to 2,659 patients in the non-COVID-19 group (OR 0.49, CI 95%, 0.46-0.52). 1125 patients in COVID-19 group had AMI compared to 1243 patients in non-COVID-19 group (OR 0.87, CI 95%, 0.80-0.94).ConclusionCOVID-19 was associated with a 2-3-fold higher risk of myocarditis. Unexpectedly, lower rates of HF diagnosis reflect challenges faced due to the severity of lung disease leading to obscuring physical exam findings required for HF diagnosis and early mortality before a diagnosis of HF was made.

Primary Pericardial Mesothelioma: A Population-Based Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Primary pericardial mesothelioma is a rare malignancy of the mesothelial lining of the pericardium. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of these patients using a United States population-based cancer database. We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program (1973-2015). Primary pericardial mesothelioma patients with complete follow-up data were included, and primary pleural mesothelioma patients were identified as controls. Propensity-score matching was used to balance individual characteristics. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank tests were performed to compare overall survival. Forty-one primary pericardial mesothelioma and 15,970 primary pleural mesothelioma patients were identified. Before matching, when compared to the pleural mesothelioma counterparts, primary pericardial mesothelioma patients were younger (median 57 vs 73 years, P < 0.001), more likely to be female (46.3% vs 20.2%, P < 0.001), more likely to be nonwhite (24.4% vs 8.4%, P=0.001), and less likely to have been diagnosed in the most recent study decade (2006-2015, 34.1% vs 43.5%, P=0.002). The overall 1- and 2-year survival rates were 22.0% and 12.2%, with a median survival of 2 months (IQR: 1-6). After 1:2 nearest neighbor propensity-score matching, 38 pericardial mesothelioma and 76 matched pleural mesothelioma cases were identified. The 2 matched groups had comparable baseline characteristics, including age, sex, race, year of diagnosis, histological type, and cancer history. Compared to their pleural mesothelioma counterparts, primary pericardial mesothelioma patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy (23.7% vs 50.0%, P=0.01) and had worse overall survival (median survival: 2 vs 10 months, log-rank P=0.006). Primary pericardial mesothelioma has worse survival outcomes than pleural mesothelioma, with a median survival of only 2 months. These patients should seek care from experienced multidisciplinary teams at tertiary care centers that handle high volumes of mesothelioma patients.

Adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in women aged 70 years and older with triple-negative breast cancer: a Swedish population-based propensity score-matched analysis

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is an aggressive form of breast cancer associated with poor survival, in which adjuvant systemic treatments are limited to chemotherapy. Due to competing mortality risks and comorbidities, older patients with TNBC are often undertreated with adjuvant chemotherapy, and clinical trials on this problem are scarce, despite a growing patient population. This study aimed to assess outcomes for patients aged 70 years and older with TNBC with or without chemotherapy in a national population-based registry, to provide information that can assist in treatment decisions for these patients. In this population-based registry study, data on all patients aged 70 years and older diagnosed with primary early TNBC (larger than 5 mm in diameter and without distant metastasis) and surgically treated between Jan 1, 2009, and Dec 31, 2016, were retrieved from the Swedish National Breast Cancer Register, the Swedish Patient Register, and the Swedish Cause of Death Register. Patients with incomplete data (on oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, surgical procedure in the breast, or information about chemotherapy) were excluded. A propensity score-matched (PSM) model was used to examine the outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy on 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS), adjusted for age, tumour size, tumour grade, nodal status, and comorbidities. Of 1130 women eligible for analysis, 368 (32·6%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, 45 (4·0%) received neoadjuvant treatment, and 717 (63·5%) did not receive chemotherapy. 5-year BCSS was significantly improved in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (85% [95% CI 81-89]) compared with patients who did not receive chemotherapy (68% [64-72]; p<0·0001). A similar benefit was observed in 5-year OS (79% [95% CI 75-84] vs 49% [45-53]; p<0·0001). In our PSM analysis, 5-year BCSS in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was 83% (95% CI 78-89), versus 73% (67-80; p=0·014) in patients not treated with chemotherapy. 5-year OS in patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy was 75% (95% CI 69-82), versus 63% (57-71; p=0·029) in patients who did not receive chemotherapy. In this PSM registry analysis of surgically treated female patients aged 70 years and older with TNBC without distant metastasis, we identified a significant benefit both in 5-year BCSS and 5-year OS with adjuvant chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy, which persisted when adjusting for age and comorbidities. These results underline the importance of considering adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Assar Gabrielsson Foundation.

Effect on survival of local treatment in patients with low prostate-specific antigen, high Gleason score prostate cancer: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis.

Emerging data suggest that in patients with low prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and high Gleason score, prostate cancer (PCa) is more aggressive and more likely to be related to genomic characteristics of neuroendocrinology. However, the evidence for the advantages of local treatment (LT) for these men is lacking. Hence, we investigated survival in men with low-PSA values and high-grade (Gleason score 8-10) PCa according to the treatment of the primary tumor. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was applied to analyze the effects on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) according to the different treatments of the primary tumor. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards survival regression analysis calculated the CSS after propensity score matching (PSM) in 2 cohorts according to treatment type. The treatment types included the following: (I) LT versus non-LT (NLT) and (II) radical prostatectomy (RP) versus radiotherapy (RT). In the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database [2004-2014], we identified 14,208 patients newly diagnosed with low PSA values (10 ng/mL or less), with a Gleason score 8-10, and cT1-4N0M0 prostate adenocarcinoma. After the first PSM, of the 3,512 PCa patients, 1,576 underwent LT and 1,576 underwent NLT. After the second PSM, of the 792 PCa patients, 396 underwent RP, and 396 underwent RT. The 5- and 10-year OS rates for LT vs. NLT patients were 90% and 73% versus 69% and 39%, respectively, while the 5- and 10-year CSS rates for LT vs. NLT patients were 98% and 94% versus 89% and 79%, respectively. Subsequent multivariate survival analysis showed that LT was associated with lower likelihood of PCa mortality relative to NLT [hazard ratio (HR), 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.14-0.26, P<0.001], also in RP versus RT (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.12-0.54, P<0.001). In patients with low PSA values, Gleason score 8-10, and localized PCa, LT resulted in higher survival compared with NLT. Within LT, RP provided the most benefit relative to RT.