Poor-risk Features Research Articles

Epcoritamab with R-CHOP Overcomes Poor Risk Features of High Total Metabolic Tumor Volume in High-Risk Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Epcoritamab with R-CHOP Overcomes Poor Risk Features of High Total Metabolic Tumor Volume in High-Risk Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Updated Results from a Phase II Study of Hyper-CVAD, with or without Inotuzumab Ozogamicin, and Sequential Blinatumomab in Patients with Newly Diagnosed B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Background Blinatumomab improves overall survival (OS) compared with chemotherapy in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and is also FDA-approved for eradication of persistent or recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD). Blinatumomab also improves OS when added to standard chemotherapy, irrespective of MRD status, in newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell ALL. Inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) improves OS in the relapsed/refractory setting, and we hypothesized that the addition of INO to hyper-CVAD plus blinatumomab would lead to deeper and more durable responses, reduce relapses, and improve survival. Methods In this phase II study, pts age 14-59 with newly diagnosed Ph-negative B-cell ALL, including pts who had received no more than 1 prior cycle of chemotherapy, were eligible. Pts had to have a performance status of ≤3, total bilirubin ≤2 mg/dl, creatinine ≤2 mg/dl, and no significant CNS pathology (except for CNS leukemia). Pts received hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate (MTX) and cytarabine (Ara-C) for up to 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles of blinatumomab at standard doses. Pts with CD20+ disease (≥1% cells) received 8 doses of ofatumumab (2000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m2). Eight doses of prophylactic IT chemotherapy were given. Maintenance was with alternating blocks of POMP (given in maintenance cycles 1-3, 5-7, 9-11, and 13-15) and blinatumomab (given in maintenance cycles 4, 8, and 12). Those with high-risk disease features started blinatumomab after 2 cycles of hyper-CVAD. Beginning with pt #39, INO at a dose of 0.3 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 was added to the 2 cycles of MTX/Ara-C (which was also dose reduced to 500 mg/m2 of MTX and 1 g/m2 of Ara-C with this amendment) and to 2 cycles of blinatumomab consolidation (4 total cycles with INO). Results As of June 2023, 75 pts have been treated (38 without INO and 37 with INO). Pt characteristics are shown in Table 1. The median age across both cohorts was 33 (range, 18-59). 36 pts (48%) had ≥1 high-risk pretreatment characteristic at enrollment (e.g. poor-risk cytogenetics, CRLF2 overexpression by flow and/or TP53 mutation). Sixteen pts were in complete remission (CR) at enrollment after 1-2 cycles of off-protocol therapy, 10 of whom were MRD-negative by 6-color flow cytometry. All 59 pts (100%) with active disease upon study entry achieved CR, with 50 pts (84%) achieving CR after the first cycle. MRD negativity by flow (sensitivity 10 -4) was achieved in 60 of 65 evaluable pts (92%), with 43 pts (66%) achieving flow MRD negativity after the first cycle. Two of the 5 patients who did not achieve flow MRD negativity had NUP214::ABL1 fusion, 1 had KMT2A rearrangement, and 2 are still early in treatment and have not yet received blinatumomab. Overall, 25 of 36 tested pts (69%) achieved next-generation sequencing-based MRD negativity at a sensitivity of 10 -6. The median duration of follow-up is 26 months (range, 1-77 months). Overall, 8 pts (11%) relapsed in the absence of SCT, 23 pts (31%) underwent stem cell transplantation (SCT) in first remission (2 of whom relapsed post-SCT), 3 pts (4%) died in CR, and 41 pts (55%) remain in continuous remission without SCT. Among the 10 relapses, 3 were in the CNS, 2 of which were CNS-only. All but one relapse occurred in pts with ≥1 poor-risk feature(s). Across both cohorts, the estimated 3-year OS was 88% and the 3-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 79% . The 3-year OS rate for pts without a high-risk baseline feature was 93% vs 83% in pts with ≥1 high-risk feature. In a landmark analysis, there was no difference in outcomes between pts who underwent SCT in first remission versus those who did not (3-year OS: 90% versus 87%). With a median follow-up of 18 months in the INO group, 3 pts (8%) have relapsed, 2 with CNS-only relapses, and none have died. The 18-month RFS in the cohorts with and without INO were 92% vs 76% (p=0.18), and the OS was 100% vs 84% (p=0.04) ( Figure 1). One pt discontinued blinatumomab due to a related adverse event (grade 2 encephalopathy and dysphasia). No pts discontinued INO due to toxicity, and no cases of veno-occlusive disease have been observed.

Real-World Use of Hypomethylating Agents (HMA)/Venetoclax Combinations in Patients with Myelodysplastic Neoplasms (MDS) in the Arabian Gulf Region

Context: Retrospective data thus far has supported improved responses with HMA/venetoclax combinations in both the frontline and relapsed settings. A Phase Ib trial of azacitidine and venetoclax for high-risk MDS patients demonstrated an overall response rate (ORR) of 80%. Retrospective data from the Moffitt Centre comparing HMA/venetoclax to patients who received HMA showed an ORR of 77% compared to 40% for patients who only received HMA. Objectives: Our aim was to obtain real-world evidence for use of combination HMA/venetoclax to treat myelodysplastic patients in the Arabian Gulf region. Methods: This is a retrospective study of patients with myelodysplastic neoplasm treated with a HMA/venetoclax in 4 different countries from Jan 2020 - May 2023. Cases were included if they were over the age of 18, and had a diagnosis of MDS or MDS/AML. Both frontline and relapsed/refractory patients were included. Patients were excluded if they had more than 20% blasts or received an additional agent with their treatment. Results: Data on 16 patients was collected across 4 centres in the Arabian Gulf. The median age was 66 (range 51-84). All patients had high-risk MDS, MDS/AML including four patients with a TP53 mutation and/or complex cytogenetics. Median follow-up was 15 months (range 4-23). A median of 6 cycles were received (range 3-14). Azacitidine was the only HMA used at a starting dose of 75mg/m 2 for 7 days. Venetoclax starting dose was 400mg (or equivalent if given with an azole) and given for a median of 15 days (range 10-28). Thirteen patients received azole prophylaxis. Thirteen patients achieved a CR/CRi (81%), one patient who didn't had a TP53 mutation with complex cytogenetics, another had secondary MDS, and the third had stable disease and proceeded to transplant. Overall survival (OS) at 12 months was 86.2% (95% CI 55.0-96.4). For patients with poor risk disease (TP53 or complex cytogenetics) OS was 66.7% (95% CI 5.4-94.5) vs 90.9% (95% CI 50.8-98.7) for non-poor risk patients; p=0.006. Median OS was 22 months (22-NR) for non-poor risk patients compared to 14 months (10-NR) for poor risk patients. Event-free survival (failure, transformation or relapse) at 12 months was 84.6% (95% CI 51.2-95.9); it was 90.0% (95% CI 47.3-98.5) for those with no poor risk features and 66.7% (5.4-94.5) for those with poor-risk features; p=0.027. For those who stopped, 4/16 stopped due to failure and disease progression or transformation, 4/16 underwent stem cell transplantation, 3 stopped due to infectious complications, two from drug access issues, and one patient with secondary MDS had recurrence of their primary solid tumour. The most common toxicities were cytopenias and one patient died from cellulitis and COVID while on HMA/venetoclax. Conclusion: The combination of HMA/ venetoclax is a feasible treatment for patients with high-risk MDS with significantly worse outcomes in patients with complex cytogenetics and/or TP53 mutations. This regimen seems to be adapted by many hematologists in our region. However, the long-term efficacy in comparison to standard of care for various subgroups of MDS needs to be explored in larger prospective studies

The emerging use of immunotherapy as a treatment option in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Real-world evidence from a single UK tertiary cancer centre.

e16509 Background: The landscape of systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) options for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has recently evolved following results from the CheckMate 214 trial in 2018 which demonstrated improved overall survival in patients with International mRCC Database Consortium (IMDC) intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC clear cell histological subtype receiving combination immunotherapy (Ipilimumab/Nivolumab) in the first-line setting compared to Sunitinib. This is in addition to other treatment options including: vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) (e.g. Sunitinib, Pazopanib, Tivozanib, Cabozantinib, etc.), combination immunotherapy/TKI (e.g. Avelumab/Axitinib), VEGF/mammalian target of Rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors (e.g. Lenvatinib/Everolimus) and single-agent immunotherapy (e.g. Nivolumab) in both first- and second-line settings. Methods: An audit of SACT prescribing practices in mRCC between 2019-2022 in a single UK tertiary cancer centre (Castle Hill Hospital, Hull, UK) was conducted as part of a national collaboration multi-centre UK audit looking into the real-world landscape and treatment choices in mRCC. Information was derived from the Somerset Cancer Registry and a dataset containing 87 patients with a coded diagnosis of ‘malignant neoplasm of kidney, except renal pelvis (CX64X)’ and ‘secondary malignant neoplasm of kidney & renal pelvis (C790)’ was generated. Results: Of the 81 patients included in the final analysis, 65% (n = 53) were male and 81% (n = 66) had a clear cell histological subtype. The main sites of metastases were lung (n = 58) and lymph nodes (n = 45). Most of the patients (n = 72) received either one or two lines of SACT. Of those with clear cell mRCC, 74% (n = 51/69) were classed as having IMDC intermediate- or poor-risk features with almost half (n = 34/69) receiving combination Ipilimumab/Nivolumab. Comparing overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) to the published Kaplan-Meier curves in the CheckMate 214 trial, no significant differences in OS (p = 0.6) and PFS (p = 0.13) were observed, although there was an overall trend towards improved PFS in the first 6 months (82.4% vs 63.3%) in our local dataset. Conclusions: The results of our real-world evaluation of prescribing practices in mRCC favoured the use of combination immunotherapy in the first-line setting for the treatment of IMDC intermediate- and poor-risk clear cell mRCC with similar outcomes to the published data in the CheckMate 214 trial. The overall trend towards improved PFS in the first 6 months in our local dataset highlights the importance of patient selection when using immunotherapy.

Progress toward Better Treatment of Therapy-Related AML.

Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia (t-AML) comprises 10-20% of all newly diagnosed cases of AML and is related to previous use of chemotherapy or ionizing radiotherapy for an unrelated malignant non-myeloid disorder or autoimmune disease. Classic examples include alkylating agents and topoisomerase II inhibitors, whereas newer targeted therapies such as poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have emerged as causative agents. Typically, t-AML is characterized by adverse karyotypic abnormalities and molecular lesions that confer a poor prognosis. Nevertheless, there are also cases of t-AML without poor-risk features. The management of these patients remains controversial. We describe the causes and pathophysiology of t-AML, putting emphasis on its mutational heterogeneity, and present recent advances in its treatment including CPX-351, hypomethylating agent plus venetoclax combination, and novel, molecularly targeted agents that promise to improve the cure rates. Evidence supporting personalized medicine for patients with t-AML is presented, as well as the authors' clinical recommendations.

A Phase I/II Study of Combination of Azacitidine, Venetoclax and Pevonedistat in Patients with Newly-Diagnosed Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) and Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) with Hypomethylating Agent (HMA) Failure

Background: Pevonedistat (PEV) is an inhibitor of NEDD8-activating enzyme (NAE) which is critical for degradation of several cellular proteins essential for tumor growth and survival. The combination of azacitidine (AZA) and venetoclax (VEN) is approved for patients (pts) with newly diagnosed (ND) AML who are unsuitable for intensive chemotherapy, and clinical studies show preliminary efficacy with AZA+VEN in higher risk MDS pts. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of AZA, VEN, and PEV in ND secondary AML (s-AML) and in MDS after HMA failure. Methods: This phase 1/2 trial enrolled pts with ND s-AML, including therapy-related AML (t-AML), AML from prior MDS or chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), or AML with dysplasia in ≥50% cells in ≥2 myeloid lineages (MRC). A second arm enrolled pts with MDS or CMML that had progressed on prior HMA therapy. Pts had to have a performance status ≤2, total bilirubin ≤1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN), ALT/AST ≤2.5 x ULN, and creatinine clearance ≥30 mL/min. Pts in AML arm may have received prior HMA for preceding hematologic malignancy. In both AML and MDS/CMML cohorts, pts received AZA 75 mg/m2 SC/IV on days 1-7 and PEV 20 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 3 and 5 on every 28 day-cycle. In AML cohort, VEN was given on days 1-28 in cycle 1 and days 1-21 on cycle 2+. In MDS/CMML cohort, VEN was given on days 3-14 in cycle 1 and days 1-14 on cycle 2+. In initial phase 1 portion of the study (AML cohort only), VEN at max dose 200 mg and 400 mg were explored. Results: Between 3/2019 and 8/2021, 32 pts with AML (10 t-AML, 22 AML from MDS/CMML/MPN, 4 MRC) and 8 pts with MDS/CMML post-HMA failure (6 with MDS, 2 with CMML) were treated (Table). In the AML cohort, the median age was 74 years, with 14 pts (44%) ≥75 years of age. Cytogenetics was adverse in 21 pts (66%), and adverse risk mutations, including TP53, RUNX1, and ASXL1 were present in 34%, 31%, and 22%, respectively. 17 pts (53%) had treated secondary AML (ts-AML; i.e. prior exposure to HMA or chemotherapy for preceding myeloid neoplasm). The overall response rate (ORR, defined as CR+CRi+MLFS) was 75%, with CR in 15 pts (47%), CRi in 6 pts (19%), and MLFS in 3 pts (9%). One pt achieved PR (3%). 78% of pts achieved best response after 1 cycle of therapy (range, 1-4 cycles to best response). Among 21 pts with CR/CRi, 10 pts (48%) achieved MRD negativity by flow cytometry. 14/21 pts (67%) with poor-risk cytogenetics responded, compared to 10/11 pts (91%) with non-poor cytogenetics. 9/11 pts (82%) with TP53-mutated AML responded. 11/17 pts (65%) with ts-AML responded, compared with 13/15 pts (87%) who did not have ts-AML. With median follow up of 20 months (mos) for the AML cohort, the median OS was 8.2 mos and median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 7.4 mos. 5 pts proceeded to transplant in first remission. The median OS for pts with adverse cytogenetics was 6.8 mos and was not reached in pts without adverse cytogenetics (1-year OS of 70%). The median OS for pts with TP53-mutated AML (n=11) was 8.1 mos, pts with inv(3) (n=4) was 3.8 mos, and pts without TP53 mutation or inv(3) (n=17) was 18 mos (Figure). In MDS/CMML HMA failure cohort, the median age was 73 years. Most pts had adverse cytogenetics (50%) and were high to very high-risk by IPSS-R (87%). Overall response rate (CR+marrow CR [mCR]+HI) was 75%, with CR in 3 pts (37%), mCR in 2 pts (25%), and HI in 1 pts (13%). With a median follow up of 11 mos, the median OS was 9.9 mos. Transformation to AML occurred in 1 pt (after 11 mos). No DLTs were observed in the phase 1 portion, and VEN 400 mg daily was the recommended phase 2 dose. Myelosuppression was similar to expectations with AZA+VEN alone. Grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events occurring in ≥10% pts were febrile neutropenia or other infection in 75%, hypophosphatemia in 22%, and hyperbilirubinemia in 10%. The 4-week and 8-week mortality rates were 9% and 25% in AML cohort and 0% and 13% in MDS/CMML cohort, respectively. Conclusion: AZA, VEN, and PEV combination is active and well-tolerated in both ND s-AML and MDS/CMML after HMA failure. This population was enriched with very poor risk features, including a majority of pts in the AML cohort with prior HMA or chemotherapy exposure for an antecedent myeloid malignancy and 1/3 of pts with a TP53 mutation. Response rates were high across disease subgroups, although duration of responses and survival were modest in pts with historically poor risk features, including those with adverse risk cytogenetics and TP53 mutations. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

High Response and Prolonged Treatment-Free Remission after a Short-Course of Modified Intensive Chemotherapy and Venetoclax in Elderly AML: An Updated Analysis of the Caveat Trial

Background Venetoclax (VEN) plus azacitidine has an established role in the management of older patients (pts) with AML (DiNardo, NEJM 2020). To explore the feasibility of intensive chemotherapy combined with VEN in older pts with newly diagnosed AML, we conducted the CAVEAT trial (Chua et al, JCO 2020). We now present an updated analysis of this trial (with >3 years median follow-up), reporting on the optimal dose of VEN with chemotherapy, with and without posaconazole (POSA), the deliverability of consolidation therapy, characteristics of treatment failure and observation of substantial treatment-free remission in subsets of pts using this time-limited, short-course regimen. Methods The CAVEAT study enrolled pts aged ≥65 years with de novo or secondary/therapy-related AML (sAML) considered suitable for intensive chemotherapy. Five VEN dose escalation cohorts (50-100-200-400-600 mg) were explored initially. Two additional cohorts examined the safety of adjusted dosing of VEN (50 or 100 mg) during anti-fungal prophylaxis with the strong CYP3A4 inhibitor POSA. For induction, VEN was administered over 14 days, commencing with a 7-day pre-chemo dose ramp-up, followed by a 7-day overlap with 5+2 chemotherapy (cytarabine 100mg/m2/d IVI d1-5 and idarubicin 12mg/m2 IV d2-3). Consolidation (CONS) with 2+1 chemotherapy (below), followed by up to 7 cycles of VEN monotherapy maintenance was planned. Results Data cut-off: 31MAR2022. A total of 69 pts are included in this analysis (first pt 17JUL2016, last pt 15MAY2020). Median age was 71 years (range 63-80). Poor risk features included sAML (42%), adverse karyotype (28%) and prior HMA (23%). From the dose escalation phase, the VEN 600 mg cohort was well tolerated (30-day mortality 6%). Induction with VEN-POSA (n=18) was also well tolerated (30-day mortality 0%) with 3 DLTs observed: 2 hematologic (1 in each cohort) and 1 due to pulmonary infiltrates occurring on d2 induction (suspected to be allopurinol hypersensitivity). No clinical TLS was observed. Although hematologic recovery was satisfactory after VEN-POSA induction, recovery was considerably longer in the VEN (100mg)-POSA cohort after CONS1 compared to VEN (50mg)-POSA for both neutrophils (median 64 vs 44d to 0.5 x109/L) and platelets (median not reached vs 26d to 50 x109/L). Therefore, if POSA is used concurrently, VEN 50 mg is recommended. Alternatively, if VEN 600 mg is used, POSA should commence only after completion of VEN. In the VEN 600 mg cohort, significant delays in hematological recovery were also observed after multiple rounds of attenuated CONS (VEN d1-14, bolus doses of cytarabine 100 mg/m2 d1-2, idarubicin 12 mg/m2 on d1), limiting deliverability (median CONS cycles 1; range 1-3). By intention-to-treat, the overall response (CR/CRi) rate was 73%. CR/CRi was 90% in de novo AML (vs 51% in sAML), 84% in intermediate karyotype (vs 69% in adverse), 76% and 83% in NPM1 and IDH2 mutant AML, respectively. With a median follow-up of 37 months (m), the median overall survival (OS) was 15.4m. Median OS was 31.3m in de novo AML (40% alive at 36m) and 30.3m in intermediate karyotype AML (38% alive at 36m). In the VEN 600 mg cohort, median OS was 24.1m (36% alive at 36m). As CAVEAT delivered just one intensive cycle of therapy, followed by limited post remission therapy (median time on therapy 7.7m), we next assessed the duration of treatment-free remission (TFR) among responders. Among pts achieving CR/CRi, 20/51 (39%) experienced TFR (Fig 1). The median TFR was 22.1m (range 4.6-48.3m). At data cut-off, 12 (24%) have ongoing TFR. Notably, 15/20 (75%) with TFR had an NPM1 or IDH2 mutation at diagnosis. 11 out of 14 evaluable pts with NPM1 mutation had mutation clearance by RT-qPCR, including 3 with NPM1 negative disease at time of failure (1 refractory, 2 relapse). Two pts with persistently mutated NPM1 at relapse had a concomitant FLT3-ITD or KIT mutation. The mutation landscape at relapse is shown (Fig 1) Conclusion VEN combined with modified intensive chemotherapy achieved high response rates in older pts with newly diagnosed AML. With long-term follow-up, the time-limited CAVEAT schedule enabled pts, especially with mutated NPM1 or IDH2, to experience a durable treatment-free remission. Cumulative hematological toxicity is limiting, prompting us to now explore non-anthracycline CONS (low dose cytarabine 20mg/m2 SC d1-10 + VEN 400mg d1-7, for up to 4 cycles), followed by VEN monotherapy (400mg D1-14 q28d cycle x7). Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

Increasing tissue requirements in lymphoma trials may exclude patients with high-risk disease or worse prognosis

AbstractAn enhanced understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) has opened the door to clinical trials evaluating novel agents with subtype-specific activity. It is an emerging question whether core needle biopsies (CNB) can adequately meet the increasing tissue requirements of these clinical trials. This can potentially lead to selective enrollment of patients who can undergo excisional biopsy (EB). It is also important to know whether patients who can undergo extensive diagnostic work up differ in their disease characteristics and outcomes from those who cannot. In this observational study, we describe the characteristics, outcomes, and adequacy of diagnostic tissue in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL and primary mediastinal large B-cell lymphoma who underwent EB vs CNB. Of the 1061 patients, 532 (49.8%) underwent EB and 529 (50.1%) underwent CNB. A significantly higher proportion of patients with CNB had advanced stage disease, an international prognostic index of ≥3, and inadequate tissue for molecular analyses. Patients with CNB had significantly worse 5-year event-free survival (67.6% vs 56.9%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; confidence interval [CI]95, 0.6-0.9, P < .001) and 5-year overall survival (76.4% vs 69.2%; HR, 0.8; CI95, 0.6-0.9, P < .001). Thus, patients who underwent CNB have poor-risk features and inferior outcomes on frontline chemoimmunotherapy, are more likely to have inadequate tissue for molecular analyses, and might not meet the tissue requirements of biomarker-driven clinical trials. Thus, the increasing tissue requirements of biomarker-driven clinical trials may result in the exclusion of patients with high-risk DLBCL who need novel agents.

P371: HYPER-CVAD WITH SEQUENTIAL BLINATUMOMAB, WITH OR WITHOUT INOTUZUMAB OZOGAMICIN, IN ADULTS WITH NEWLY DIAGNOSED PHILADELPHIA CHROMOSOME-NEGATIVE B-CELL ACUTE LYMPHOBLASTIC LEUKEMIA

Background: Blinatumomab and inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO) are highly effective in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); blinatumomab is also the only approved therapy for eradication of persistent or recurrent measurable residual disease (MRD) after initial ALL therapy. We hypothesized that early incorporation of blinatumomab and INO in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell ALL would lead to deeper and more durable responses, reduce relapses, and improve survival. Aims: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of hyper-CVAD with sequential blinatumomab, with or without INO, in pts with newly diagnosed Ph-negative B-cell ALL. Methods: Pts 14-59 years of age with newly diagnosed Ph-negative B-cell ALL, including pts who had received no more than 1 prior cycle of chemotherapy, were eligible. Pts were required to have a performance status of ≤3, total bilirubin ≤2 mg/dl, creatinine ≤2 mg/dl, and no significant CNS pathology (with the exception of CNS leukemia). Pts received hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose methotrexate and cytarabine for up to 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles of blinatumomab at standard doses. Pts with CD20+ disease (≥1% cells) received 8 doses of ofatumumab (2000 mg) or rituximab (375 mg/m2). Eight doses of prophylactic IT chemotherapy were given. Maintenance was with alternating blocks of POMP (given in maintenance cycles 1-3, 5-7, 9-11, and 13-15) and blinatumomab (given in maintenance cycles 4, 8, and 12). Those with high-risk disease features started blinatumomab after 2 cycles of hyper-CVAD. Beginning with pt #39, INO at a dose of 0.3 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 was added to the 2 cycles of MTX/Ara-C and to 2 cycles of blinatumomab consolidation (4 total cycles with INO). Results: As of February 2022, 58 pts have been treated (38 without INO and 20 with INO). Pt characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Median age was 34 years (range, 17-59 years). 13 pts were in CR at enrollment. Among 45 pts with active disease at study entry, 100% achieved CR, with 80% achieving CR after the first cycle. MRD negativity by 6-color flow cytometry was achieved in 32/42 evaluable pts (76%) after 1 cycle and 55/58 evaluable pts (95%) overall. Two of the 3 pts who did not achieved MRD negativity were later found to have a NUP214::ABL1 fusion. The median duration of follow-up is 26 months (range, 3-61 months). Overall, 5 pts (9%) did not undergo stem cell transplant (SCT) and subsequently relapsed, 18 pts (34%) underwent SCT in first remission (including 2 additional pts who relapsed post-SCT), 2 pts (3%) died in CR, and 33 pts (57%) remain in continuous remission without SCT. All relapses occurred in pts with ≥1 poor-risk feature(s), and no relapses have occurred beyond 2 years from the start of treatment. For the entire cohort, the 3-year continuous remission and OS rates were 84% and 85%, respectively (Figure 1). No relapses or deaths have occurred in the INO group, and the estimated 1-year OS rate is 100%. Treatment was overall well-tolerated. One pt discontinued blinatumomab due to a related adverse event (grade 2 encephalopathy and dysphasia). No pts discontinued INO due to toxicity, and no cases of veno-occlusive disease have been observed. Image:Summary/Conclusion: Hyper-CVAD with sequential blinatumomab, with or without INO, is highly effective as frontline treatment of Ph-negative B-cell ALL, with an overall MRD negativity rate of 95% and a 3-year OS rate of 85%. Early outcomes with the addition of INO to this regimen are encouraging, with no relapses or deaths observed to date.

A phase II study of hyper-CVAD with sequential blinatumomab (Blina), with or without inotuzumab ozogamicin (INO), in adults with newly diagnosed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL).

7034 Background: Blina and INO are highly effective in relapsed/refractory B-cell ALL and are associated with high rates of measurable residual disease (MRD) clearance. Use of these agents in the frontline setting may improve outcomes. Methods: Patients (pts) 14-59 years of age with newly diagnosed Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-cell ALL, including pts who had received no more than 1 prior cycle of chemotherapy, were eligible. Pts received hyper-CVAD alternating with high-dose MTX/Ara-C for up to 4 cycles, followed by 4 cycles of Blina. Pts with CD20+ disease received 8 doses of an anti-CD20 antibody. Eight doses of IT chemotherapy were given. Maintenance was with alternating blocks of POMP (maintenance cycles 1-3, 5-7, 9-11, and 13-15) and Blina (maintenance cycles 4, 8, and 12). Beginning with pt #39, INO at a dose of 0.3 mg/m2 on day 1 and 8 was added to the 2 cycles of MTX/Ara-C and to 2 cycles of Blina (4 total cycles with INO). Results: Characteristics of the 58 treated pts (38 without INO and 20 with INO) are summarized in Table. Among 45 pts with active disease at study entry, 100% achieved CR. Overall, 76% achieved MRD negativity by flow cytometry after induction and 95% at any time over the course of therapy. The median follow-up of the entire cohort is 26 months (range, 3-61+ months). Overall, 5 pts (9%) relapsed, 18 (31%) underwent transplant in first remission (including an additional 2 pts who relapsed post-transplant), 2 (3%) died in CR, and 33 (57%) remain in continuous remission without transplant. All relapses occurred in pts with established poor-risk features and no relapses have occurred beyond 2 years. For the entire cohort, the estimated 3-year OS is 85% and the 3-year continuous remission duration is 84%. No relapses or deaths have occurred in the INO group, and the estimated 1-year OS is 100%. Treatment was overall well-tolerated. One patient discontinued Blina due to recurrent grade 2 neurotoxicity. No pts have discontinued INO due to toxicity and no cases of veno-occlusive disease have been observed. Conclusions: Hyper-CVAD with sequential Blina is highly effective as frontline treatment of Ph-negative B-cell ALL. The addition of INO to this regimen was safe and early results are encouraging, with no relapses observed to date. Clinical trial information: NCT01371630. [Table: see text]

Use of Venetoclax in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: The PETHEMA Registry Experience.

Simple SummaryThe use of venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine in patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia unfit for intensive chemotherapy was recently approved. However, the evidence in relapse or refractory patients is still scarce. The cohort of patients included in our study was heavily pretreated and had a poor performance status. It is still necessary to identify those patients at higher risk of early death who would not benefit from this type of treatment. For these ultra-high-risk patients, other treatment strategies should be followed.The effectiveness of venetoclax (VEN) in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML) has not been well established. This retrospective, multicenter, observational database studied the effectiveness of VEN in a cohort of 51 RR-AML patients and evaluated for predictors of response and overall survival (OS). The median age was 68 years, most were at high risk, 61% received ≥2 therapies for AML, 49% had received hypomethylating agents, and ECOG was ≥2 in 52%. Complete remission (CR) rate, including CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi), was 12.4%. Additionally, 10.4% experienced partial response (PR). The CR/CRi was higher in combination with azacitidine (AZA; 17.9%) than with decitabine (DEC; 6.7%) and low-dose cytarabine (LDAC; 0%). Mutated NPM1 was associated with increased CR/CRi. Median OS was 104 days (95% CI: 56–151). For the combination with AZA, DEC, and LDAC, median OS was 120 days, 104 days, and 69 days, respectively; p = 0.875. Treatment response and ECOG 0 influenced OS in a multivariate model. A total of 28% of patients required interruption of VEN because of toxicity. Our real-life series describes a marginal probability of CR/CRi and poor OS after VEN-based salvage. Patients included had very poor-risk features and were heavily pretreated. The small percentage of responders did not reach the median OS.

Treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Introduction. The myelodysplastic syndromes are a group of clonal haematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized by cytopenia, dysplasia, ineffective hematopiesis, recurrent genetic abnormalities, and increased risk of developing acute myeloid leukemia. In this paper, we present the review and recommendations for treatment of high risk myelodysplastic syndromes on behalf of the Serbian myelodysplastic syndromes group. Material and Methods. A literature review was conducted using the following bibliographic databases: Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Kobson. The recommendations treatment of high risk myelodysplastic syndromes are based on expert opinion based on review of literature and contemporary recommendations for treatment of high risk for myelodysplastic syndromes. Recommendations. Higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes should be defined in patients risk group with &gt; 3.5 IPSS-R score. Allo- HSCT is recommended in fit higher-risk patients with IPSS-R &gt; 3.5 as well as in fit lower-risk patients with poor risk features according to EBMT/ELN International expert panel and myelodysplastic syndromes right group. Acute myeloid leukemia like or hypomethylation treatment before Allo-HSCT is indicated in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with ? 10% of blasts. Azacitidine is recommended in intermediate-2 and high risk IPSS patients who are not eligible for transplantation with minimal number of six cycles to define response. Acute myeloid leukemia like treatment is recommended in fit higher-risk for patients with myelodysplastic syndromes with excess of blasts, good performance status, without substantial comorbidities, and with no poor/very poor cytogenetics/genetics. Conclusion. The treatment of fit higher-risk patients should be based on allo-SCT. In patients who are not candidates for transplant hypomethylation treatment is indicated as well as acute myeloid leukemia like treatment in selected patients.

Treatment of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome

Introduction. We present the recommendations for treatment of the lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes on behalf of the Serbian myelodysplastic syndromes group. Material and Methods. A literature review was conducted using the following bibliographic databases: Google Scholar, MEDLINE and Kobson. The recommendations for treatment of lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes are based on expert opinion based on review of the literature and contemporary recommendations for treatment of lower risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Recommendations. Anemia is the most relevant cytopenia in terms of frequency and symptoms in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes, and may be treated successfully with erythropoietic stimulating agents, with or without granulocyte growth factor, provided a careful selection is performed on the basis of Revised International Prognostic Scoring System, endogenous erythropoietin levels, and transfusion independence. In case a patient fails erythropoietic stimulating agents treatment, the available options may include lenalidomide, hypomethylating agents, and a rather large number of experimental agents. Chelation therapy is recommended in patients who have received or are anticipated to receive &gt; 20 red blood cell transfusions and those with serum ferritin levels &gt; 2500 ng/mL. Specific therapy for thrombocytopenia has been proposed in experimental clinical trials with thrombomimetic agents that have shown good efficacy, but raised some safety concern. Severe neutropenia is targeted symptomatically with growth factor supportive care. The immunosuppressive treatments are indicated mainly for pancytopenia, hypoplastic lowerrisk myelodysplastic syndromes. Finally, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the curative option for younger, good performance (fit) lower-risk patient with poor risk features, according to European Blood and Marrow Transplantation/European Leukemia Net International expert panel and myelodysplastic syndrome-RIGHT group. Conclusion. Treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes is mainly based on resolution of symptoms due to particular cytopenia(s).

Azacitidine, Venetoclax and Pevonedistat As Frontline Therapy for Patients with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy: Results from a Phase I/II Study

Azacitidine, Venetoclax and Pevonedistat As Frontline Therapy for Patients with Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Unfit for Intensive Chemotherapy: Results from a Phase I/II Study

Venetoclax Therapy in a Heavily Treated Cohort of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Update of the Pethema Registry Experience

IntroductionThe prognosis of patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML) is very poor, and treatment options are very limited. The exciting results of venetoclax (VEN) in untreated AML have led to its off-label use in RR-AML. However, evidence in RR-AML is still scarce and the available data are mostly from retrospective and single-center studies. The aim of our study was to analyze the effectiveness of VEN use in patients with RR-AML reported to the PETHEMA AML epidemiological registry. Initial results were presented previously (Labrador J, et al. ASH 2020). Here, we report an updated analysis.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective, multicenter, observational study of a cohort of patients with AML-RR who were treated with venetoclax in the hospitals of the PETHEMA group. We evaluated efficacy, CR/CRi rate and overall survival (OS). We performed a descriptive analysis. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.ResultsFifty-one patients were included, 33 men and 18 women, with a median age of 68 years (25-82). The main characteristics of the included patients are shown in Table 1.With a median follow-up of 167 days, 10/51 patients (19%) continued to receive VEN at the time of analyses. Patients received a median of 2 cycles (0-8). VEN was administered with azacitidine (AZA) in 59%, with decitabine (DEC) in 29% and with low-dose cytarabine (LDAC) in 12% of patients, respectively. The CR/CRi and partial response (PR) rates were 12.4% and 10.4%, respectively. The CR/RCi and overall response (ORR, CR/CRi+PR) was higher in patients receiving VEN+AZA (17.9% and 32.1%) than in those receiving DEC + VEN (6.7% and 13.3%) or LDAC + VEN (0%).The presence of NPM1 or CEBPA variants were the only two variables associated with increased CR/CRi with VEN in RR-AML. Median OS was 104 days (95% CI: 56 - 151) (Figure 1A), 120 days in combination with AZA, 104 days with DEC, and 69 days with LDAC; p=0.875. Treatment response (Figure 1B) and ECOG 0 were the only variables that influenced OS in a multivariate model adjusted for age and sex (Table 2). VEN-resistant patients who received subsequent salvage therapy had superior median OS (98 vs. 5 days, p=0.004).Twenty-eight percent of patients required discontinuation of VEN due to toxicity. Sixty-one percent of patients required admission, mainly due to infections (45%), 10% due to bleeding and other causes in 12%. One case of tumor lysis syndrome was described.ConclusionsOur real-life series depicts a marginal probability of CR/CRi and poor OS after venetoclax-based salvage. Patients treated with this regimen had very poor-risk features, and were heavily pre-treated, which could explain in part the observed poor outcomes. Although follow-up is still short, the small proportion of responders did not reach the median OS. Further studies will help to identify those patients potentially benefiting from venetoclax-based salvage regimens. [Display omitted] DisclosuresBelén Vidriales: Roche: Consultancy; Novartis: Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Jazz: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Pérez-Encinas: Janssen: Consultancy. Tormo: Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Astellas: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Montesinos: Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Glycomimetics: Consultancy; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Karyopharm: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Forma Therapeutics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Stemline/Menarini: Consultancy; Tolero Pharmaceutical: Consultancy; Agios: Consultancy; AbbVie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma, Inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Advisory board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau. OffLabel Disclosure:Venetoclax for Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Fixed Duration Combination Therapy with Ibrutinib (ibr) and Venetoclax (ven) Leads to Deep Responses in Relapsed/Refractory (rel/ref) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Phase 2 Study

Fixed Duration Combination Therapy with Ibrutinib (ibr) and Venetoclax (ven) Leads to Deep Responses in Relapsed/Refractory (rel/ref) Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Phase 2 Study

Richter's Transformation after CD-19 Directed CAR-T Cells for Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Richter's Transformation after CD-19 Directed CAR-T Cells for Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL)

Subcutaneous Epcoritamab in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Preliminary Results from the Epcore CLL-1 Trial

Background: Small molecules such as Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) and B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitors have transformed the management of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). However, such treatments are not curative, and patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (R/R) CLL following multiple targeted treatments present an emergent challenge with very limited therapeutic options. In addition, success rates of autologous T-cell-based therapies in CLL have been disappointing. In vitro data in CLL cells suggest potentially high efficacy of bispecific T-cell engagers (Martens et al, J Immunother Cancer 2020), but clinical data are extremely limited.Epcoritamab (GEN3013; DuoBody ®-CD3×CD20) is a bispecific antibody that can induce potent activation and cytotoxic activity of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells to specifically eliminate CD20-expressing cells (van der Horst et al, Blood Cancer J 2021). In the first-in-human trial in R/R B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL; EPCORE NHL-1; NCT03625037), epcoritamab showed manageable safety and meaningful antitumor activity across a range of aggressive and indolent B-NHLs. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were pyrexia (69%), cytokine release syndrome (CRS; 59%), and injection-site reaction (47%); CRS events were all grade 1-2 and most occurred in cycle 1 (Clausen et al, J Clin Oncol 2021). However, as CLL is characterized by presence of (high numbers of) circulating tumor cells, acquired T-cell dysfunction, and variable expression of CD20, data obtained in B-NHL are difficult to extrapolate to CLL. Herein we present the first results from the dose-escalation part of a phase 1b/2 trial evaluating epcoritamab in pts with R/R CLL.Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 1b/2 trial, toxicity and efficacy of epcoritamab are investigated in adults with R/R CLL (EPCORE CLL-1; NCT04623541). Eligible pts previously received ≥2 lines of systemic antineoplastic therapy, including treatment with (or intolerance to) a BTK inhibitor. Epcoritamab is subcutaneously administered via 1-mL injections in 4-week cycles as follows: once weekly in cycles 1-3, every 2 weeks in cycles 4-9, and monthly in cycles ≥10 until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Step-up dosing during cycle 1 (ie, priming dose followed by an intermediate dose, then full doses) is used in combination with steroid prophylaxis to reduce the risk of CRS. In the dose-escalation part, pts with R/R CLL received epcoritamab at 2 full-dose levels (24 and 48 mg) according to a modified 3+3 design. Primary end points of the dose-escalation part included dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first 28-day treatment cycle and the incidence and severity of AEs, CRS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS), and tumor lysis syndrome (TLS).Results: The first pt was enrolled on November 30, 2020. As of July 12, 2021, 7 pts with R/R CLL received epcoritamab subcutaneously administered at 2 full-dose levels: 24 mg (n=3) and 48 mg (n=4). Six pts completed the DLT evaluation period, and 5 pts had a full response assessment. Pts had received a median of 4 lines of prior therapy (range, 2-5). Six of 7 pts had poor-risk features of del(17p), TP53 mutations, or both. Three of 7 pts had bulky disease.No DLTs occurred at 24 or 48 mg. The most common treatment-emergent AEs (>30%) were CRS (100%), fatigue (71%), injection-site reaction (43%), and nausea (43%). All pts experienced CRS in the first cycle, but no CRS events were higher than grade 2. No cases of ICANS were observed. TLS was not observed. Antileukemic activity has been observed at both dose levels, with partial responses in 3 of 5 pts. Updated clinical and pharmacokinetic data, including data for additional pts treated with epcoritamab, will be presented.Conclusions: These data suggest that epcoritamab is well tolerated in pts with R/R CLL at dose levels up to 48 mg and has clinical activity in pts with high-risk features. The expansion part of this study in pts with R/R CLL and Richter syndrome will open later this year. DisclosuresKater: Janssen, AstraZeneca: Other: Ad Board, steering committee, Research Funding; BMS, Roche/Genentech: Other: Ad Board, , Research Funding; Genmab, LAVA: Other: Ad Board, Steering Committee; Abbvie: Honoraria, Other: Ad Board, Research Funding. Niemann: CSL Behring, Genmab, Takeda, Octapharma: Consultancy; Abbvie, AstraZeneca, Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novo Nordisk Foundation: Research Funding. Hutchings: Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genmab: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Research Funding. Chen: Genmab: Current Employment. Rios: Genmab: Current Employment. Palenski: AbbVie: Current Employment. Li: Genmab: Current Employment. Mato: AbbVie: Consultancy, Research Funding; Adaptive Biotechnologies: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pharmacyclics LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; MSKCC: Current Employment; Genmab: Research Funding; Johnson and Johnson: Consultancy, Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; LOXO: Consultancy, Research Funding; Nurix: Research Funding; DTRM BioPharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy, Other: DSMB, Research Funding; BeiGene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Acerta/AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy, Research Funding.

Impact of Central Nervous System Involvement in Adult Patients with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Treated in a Pediatrics-Inspired Protocol - a Graall Study

▪Background: The prognosis of central nervous system (CNS) involvement in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has been historically associated with a dismal outcome. Whereas the prognosis of adult patients with ALL has greatly improved since the advent of pediatrics-inspired regimens, the prognostic impact of CNS involvement has not been formerly reevaluated. We report herein the impact of CNS involvement in patients included in the pediatric-inspired prospective GRAALL-2005 study.Methods: All patients received a 5-drug induction therapy with native E. Coli-ASP intravenous injections. Patients in complete remission (CR) received two consolidation courses with alternating cycles including high dose cytarabine (2g/m2/12h on days 1 and 2), high dose methotrexate (3 g/m2 on day 1), and cyclophosphamide. All patients in persistent CR and with no indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) received late intensification, followed by one last consolidation course. Patients with initial CNS involvement, clinically and/or cytologically (cerebrospinal fluid), were recommended to receive an increased number of triple intrathecal therapy, CNS irradiation, and were eligible for allogeneic SCT in first CR. They received less Asp injections during induction therapy to avoid CNS adverse events. CNS irradiation included two lateral fields encompassing the skull, facial, the base of the skull, and the first two cervical vertebrae at a dose of 24 grays for those not receiving allogeneic SCT and 15 grays for those receiving allogeneic SCT.Results: Between 2006 and 2014, 784 adult patients with newly diagnosed Philadelphia-negative ALL were included with 55 (7%) having initial CNS involvement. These patients were more likely to be of T-phenotype (51 versus 32%, p=.004) and had more white blood cells at diagnosis (median 23 G/l versus 11 G/l, p=.02). Most patients (36 pts, 66%) were classified as CNS-3 (> 5 white blood cells/µl and a positive cytospin and/or clinical signs) whereas 5 patients (9%) were CNS-2 (< 5 white blood cells/µl and a positive cytospin), and 14 (25%) have data pending. Among patients with details regarding CNS involvement, 25/41 (61%) had clinical signs including trigeminal anesthesia (9 pts, 36%), facial paralysis (4 pts, 16%), extremities paresthesia (4 pts, 16%), visual signs (2 pts, 8%), meningeal syndrome (2 pts, 8%), and motor deficit (2 pts, 8%), and 4/18 (22%) had radiological signs. Induction death, CR1 rate, and negative minimal residual disease after induction were similar whether patients had CNS involvement or not (6 vs 6%, 89 vs 89%, 73 vs 62%, 26 vs 22%, respectively). Patients with CNS involvement had a worse outcome than those without with a median event-free survival (EFS) of 391 days (versus not reached for patients without CNS involvement, HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2 - 2.5, p=.002) and a median overall survival (OS) of 608 days (versus not reached for patients without CNS involvement, HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3 - 2.6, p=.001) (figure). Similar results were observed when patients who received allogeneic SCT in CR1 were censored at the time of graft. As recommended, patients with CNS involvement were more likely to receive allogeneic SCT than those without (53 versus 34%, p=.01), with a median time of 169 days. A 150-day landmark analysis, excluding 12 patients with an EFS event before 150 days, was performed to study the impact of allogeneic SCT on the outcome of patients with CNS involvement. Allogeneic SCT had no impact on either EFS (HR: .5, 95% CI: .2 - 1.2, p=.15) or OS (HR: .8, 95% CI: .3 - 1.8, p=.53).Conclusion: Despite improved outcome in young adult ALL patients with pediatrics-inspired protocols, CNS involvement remains a poor-risk feature. The historical use of allogeneic SCT does not improve outcome. Specific regimens should be developed for adult ALL patients with CNS involvement. [Display omitted] DisclosuresHuguet: Amgen: Other: Advisor; BMS: Other: Advisor; Celgene: Other: Advisor; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisor; Novartis: Other: Advisor; Pfizer: Other: Advisor. Barbieux: ASTRA-ZENECCA: Consultancy. Vey: Amgen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; BIOKINESIS: Consultancy, Research Funding; NOVARTIS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; SERVIER: Consultancy; JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS: Honoraria; JANSSEN: Consultancy. Dombret: Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Incyte: Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Research Funding; Abbvie: Honoraria; BMS-Celgene: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria. Boissel: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Servier: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; JAZZ Pharma: Honoraria, Research Funding; CELGENE: Honoraria; SANOFI: Honoraria; PFIZER: Consultancy, Honoraria. Mathilde: ABBVIE: Consultancy; SERVIER: Consultancy.

Updated Results from a Phase II Study of Hyper-CVAD with Sequential Blinatumomab in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Updated Results from a Phase II Study of Hyper-CVAD with Sequential Blinatumomab in Adults with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Negative B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia