Poor Metabolizers Of Sparteine Research Articles

Phenotype of cytochrome P450 CYP2D6 in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis

This paper describes an attempt to establish the distribution of the oxidative phenotype of sparteine in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). The oxidative polymorphism of sparteine was determined in 30 patients with FAP. One hundred and twenty-six normal subjects were examined as a control group. Subjects with urinary metabolic ratios (MR) greater than 20 (the metabolic ratio of sparteine/dehydrosparteines excreted in urine) were defined as poor metabolizers of sparteine. None of the patients were classified as poor metabolizers of sparteine, although 5 control subjects were. No significant differences were found in the distribution of frequencies between patients and control subjects. However, there was a higher metabolic ratio (mean 1.58 +/- 1.13) in 5 patients with malignant changes in large bowel adenomas compared with other FAP patients without malignant changes (mean MR 0.89 +/- 0.66).

Is therapeutic drug monitoring a case for optimizing clinical outcome and avoiding interactions of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors?

The selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) comprise citalopram, fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, and sertraline and they differ from each other in chemical structure, by pharmacokinetic properties and, most importantly, with respect to enzyme-specific metabolism and interactions. Citalopram is administered as a racemic mixture. The drug is oxidated to desmethylcitalopram in the liver, partially by CYP2C19 and partially by CYP3A4. Fluoxetine is administered as a racemate of R- and S-fluoxetine. Both R- and S-fluoxetine are metabolized by CYP2D6 to the active metabolites R- and S-norfluoxetine. Fluvoxamine is metabolized to inactive metabolites by CYP1A2 and CYP2D6. Paroxetine is metabolized to inactive metabolites partially by CYP2D6, and accordingly the metabolism of paroxetine is dependent on the genetic polymorphism of CYP2D6. Sertraline is metabolized to desmethylsertraline, probably by CYP3A4. Several analytical methods have been described for all SSRIs. Most assays are based on separation by high-performance liquid chromatography or gas chromatography. Stereoselective methods for the analysis of racemic citalopram and fluoxetine have been published. The SSRIs are generally well tolerated and their therapeutic indices are large. In several studies there has not been found a clear relationship between clinical efficacy and plasma concentration, nor any threshold that defines toxic concentrations. The available data do not suggest that any benefit be obtained from routine monitoring of SSRI plasma levels. Therefore therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of the SSRIs may be useful mainly in situations where poor compliance is suspected and when therapeutic failure or toxic events are experienced at clinically relevant dosages. Further, in special populations, such as in elderly patients, poor metabolizers of sparteine (CYP2D6) or mephenytoin (CYP2C19), and patients with liver impairment, the measurement of plasma concentrations may be useful.

Polymorphic CYP2D6 mediates O-demethylation of the opioid analgesic tramadol.

This study was designed to investigate whether the in vivo metabolism of tramadol was influenced by CYP2D6 polymorphism. The extent of tramadol O- and N-demethylation was calculated by determining the amounts of tramadol and O- and N-desmethyltramadol in 24 h urine after ingestion of a test dose of tramadol. The O- and N-demethylation rates were calculated by dividing the 24-h urinary excretion amount of tramadol by that of O- and N-desmethyltramadol. Volunteers were phenotyped for CYP2D6 polymorphism using sparteine as an in vivo probe. High correlation was found between tramadol-O-demethylation and sparteine oxidation in 71 extensive metabolizers of sparteine (rs = 0.544). The mean metabolic ratio of tramadol O-demethylation was significantly higher in poor metabolizers of sparteine than in extensive metabolizers (4.4 vs 0.8). These in vivo results confirm that tramadol O-demethylation is carried out to a large extent by the polymorphic CYP2D6.

Imipramine metabolism in relation to the sparteine oxidation polymorphism--a family study.

The relationship between genetic polymorphism and imipramine metabolism has never been studied in a family study. A sparteine/mephenytoin test was carried out in 31 parents and 20 siblings of 18 Danish poor metabolizers of sparteine (PMs). One week later, each subject took 25 mg imipramine followed by urine collection for 24 h. The urinary content of imipramine, desipramine, 2-hydroxy-imipramine and 2-hydroxy-desipramine was assayed by HPLC. There were 10 PMs (20%; 9.8-33%, 95% confidence interval) and 41 extensive metabolizers of sparteine (EMs) among parents and siblings. In 26 of the 28 PMs among probands and relatives, there were concordance between phenotype and genotype: D6-A/D6-D (n = 2), D6-A/D6-B (n = 5), D6-B/(n = 15) or D6-B/D6-D (n = 4). Two PMs were apparently heterozygous (EMs), D6-wt/D6-B. Accordingly, based on the present sample of 28 PMs the specificity of the genotype test was 100% and the sensitivity was 92.9%. Two EMs were homozygous dominant D6-wt/and 39 were heterozygous EMs; D6-wt/D6-D (n = 5), D6-wt/D6-B (n = 27), D6-wt/D6-A (n = 6), D6-wt/D6-wt* (unknown mutation) (n = 1). As previously reported in a population study the hydroxylation ratios (i.e. 2-hydroxymetabolite over parent compound) of imipramine were much lower in PMs than in EMs. This and the pedigrees confirmed the co-segregation of sparteine oxidation, imipramine 2-hydroxylation and the CYP2D6 genotype. None of the hydroxylation ratios could separate EMs and PMs completely, mainly because the 2-hydroxylation of imipramine also depends on P450s other than CYP2D6.

Single-dose kinetics of clomipramine: Relationship to the sparteine and S-mephenytoin oxidation polymorphisms

The influence of the sparteine and the S-mephenytoin oxidation polymorphisms on the kinetics of clomipramine were investigated in 25 healthy volunteers: 10 extensive metabolizers of sparteine and mephenytoin (EMs/EMm), nine poor metabolizers of sparteine and extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin (PMs/EMm), five extensive metabolizers of sparteine and poor metabolizers of mephenytoin (EMs/PMm), and one poor metabolizer of sparteine and mephenytoin (PMs/PMm). A single oral dose of 100 mg clomipramine hydrochloride was given to each subject after an overnight fast. Serum and urine levels of clomipramine and its metabolites were monitored after 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 11, 14, 24, 36, 48, and 96 hours. Additional serum was monitored after 6, 9, 12, and 15 days in the poor metabolizers. 2-Hydroxyclomipramine was undetectable in most subjects before enzymatic hydrolysis of serum and urine. The total median clearance of clomipramine was 99 L.hr-1 (range, 68 to 210) in the EMs/EMm subjects, 56 L.hr-1 (range, 37 to 183) in the PMs/EMm subjects, 66 L.hr-1 (range, 37 to 89) in the EMs/PMm subjects, and 43 L.hr-1 in the PMs/PMm subject. It was significantly lower in PMs/EMm and EMs/PMm subjects compared with EMs/EMm subjects (p = 0.006 and 0.028, respectively; Mann-Whitney). In addition, the formation clearance of 2-hydroxyclomipramine and the hydroxylation indexes were significantly lower in PMs/EMm subjects, as was the demethylation index in EMs/PMm subjects compared with EMs/EMm subjects. Our data thus provide evidence that the 2- and 8-hydroxylation of clomipramine are catalyzed by CYP2D6 and that the N-demethylation is catalyzed in part by CYP2C.

Inhibition by paroxetine of desipramine metabolism in extensive but not in poor metabolizers of sparteine.

Nine extensive metabolizers (EMs) and eight poor metabolizers (PMs) of sparteine took a single oral dose of 100 mg of desipramine HCI before and while taking paroxetine 20 mg per day. Before paroxetine, the median of the total desipramine clearance was 7 times higher in EMs than in PMs (102 and 15 l.h-1 respectively). This confirms that desipramine is extensively metabolized via the sparteine/debrisoquine oxidation polymorphism i.e. by CYP2D6. During paroxetine, the median clearances were 22 l.h-1 and 18 l.h-1 in EMs and PMs respectively. The 5-fold decrease in clearance in EMs when desipramine was co-administered with paroxetine confirms that paroxetine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6. The lack of effect on clearance in PMs shows that paroxetine is a selective inhibitor of CYP2D6, which is absent from the livers of PMs. Before paroxetine, the median of desipramine clearance via 2-hydroxylation was 40-times higher in EMs than in PMs (56 and 1.4 l.h-1 respectively), but during paroxetine, it was only 2-times higher (6 and 2.9 l.h-1 respectively). The increase in this clearance in PMs suggests that paroxetine is an inducer of the alternative, unidentified P450(s) which catalyze(s) the formation of 2-OH-desipramine in this phenotype. Before paroxetine, the median amounts of 2-OH-desipramine glucuronide recovered in urine were 69% and 68% of the total recovery of 2-OH-desipramine in urine in EMs and PMs respectively. During paroxetine, the corresponding values were 77% and 84%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Inhibition by Paroxetine of Desipramine Metabolism in Extensive but not in Poor Metabolizers of Sparteine

Inhibition by Paroxetine of Desipramine Metabolism in Extensive but not in Poor Metabolizers of Sparteine

Pharmacokinetics of Citalopram in Relation to the Sparteine and the Mephenytoin Oxidation Polymorphisms

The relationship between the metabolism of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor citalopram and the sparteine and mephenytoin oxidation polymorphisms was studied in 24 healthy male volunteers, constituting panels of extensive metabolizers of sparteine and mephenytoin (n = 10), poor metabolizers of sparteine (n = 8), and poor metabolizers of mephenytoin (n = 6). Each subject was given 40 mg/day citalopram for 10 days and citalopram, and its des- and didesmethylmetabolites were assayed in serum and urine. Using a nonenantioselective analytical method (high-performance liquid chromatography), it was shown that the citalopram elimination partially depends on the mephenytoin oxygenase, since steady-state serum concentration, half-life, and area under the serum concentration/time curve for citalopram were significantly higher in poor metabolizers of mephenytoin than in extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin. Both citalopram total clearance and demethylation clearance (formation of desmethylcitalopram) were significantly lower in poor metabolizers of mephenytoin compared to extensive metabolizers (median 15.2 vs. 27.3 and 2.6 vs. 5.9 L/h, respectively). It was further indicated that the demethylation of desmethylcitalopram to didesmethylcitalopram depends on the sparteine oxygenase CYP2D6. Didesmethylcitalopram could virtually not be detected in any poor metabolizers of sparteine, contrasting measurable serum levels in all sparteine/mephenytoin extensive metabolizers. The demethylation clearance of desmethylcitalopram was significantly lower in sparteine poor metabolizers compared to extensive metabolizers (0.3 vs. 2.4 L/h, respectively). During administration of citalopram, there was a modest increase in sparteine metabolic ratio from median 0.31 to 0.80 in extensive metabolizers of sparteine, whereas the mephenytoin S/R ratio was unaltered during citalopram treatment. Both the sparteine and the mephenytoin oxidation polymorphism thus appear to contribute partially to the total pharmacokinetic variability of citalopram.

Pharmacokinetics of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine: nonlinearity and relation to the sparteine oxidation polymorphism.

Steady-state plasma concentrations of paroxetine were studied at five or more paroxetine dose levels (10 to 70 mg/day) in each of 13 extensive metabolizers of sparteine and at three or four dose levels (10 to 40 mg/day) in each of three poor metabolizers of sparteine, all treated for diabetic neuropathy symptoms. On a dose of 30 mg/day there was a 25-fold variation in steady-state concentrations (25 to 670 nmol/L). The upper extreme of this variation was made up by the poor metabolizers of sparteine and the lower extreme by some fast extensive metabolizers. Further, within the extensive metabolizer group, steady-state levels showed a significant, positive correlation with sparteine metabolic ratio at all dose levels. On increasing doses, a disproportionate increase in plasma drug levels was observed in the majority of patients. In nearly all extensive metabolizers the concentration-dose data were best described by a pharmacokinetic model assuming elimination by at least two kinetically distinct processes, one a high-affinity saturable process and one a low-affinity linear process. Estimates of clearance at low drug levels of the high-affinity process showed a significant negative correlation with the sparteine metabolic ratio. Clearance of the low-affinity process was not related to the metabolic ratio and was of the same magnitude in extensive and poor metabolizers. The data thus confirmed that the metabolism of paroxetine and sparteine cosegregates and indicated that the enzyme responsible for a high-affinity saturable paroxetine elimination process is identical with CYP2D6, the source of the sparteine oxidation polymorphism.

The relationship between paroxetine and the sparteine oxidation polymorphism.

The relationship between the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor paroxetine and the sparteine oxidation polymorphism was investigated in a combined single-dose (30 mg) and steady-state (30 mg/day for 2 weeks) study including a panel of nine extensive metabolizers and eight poor metabolizers of sparteine. The median area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) after the first paroxetine dose was about seven times higher in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers (3910 versus 550 nmol.hr/L), whereas at steady state the median AUCss tau interphenotype difference was only twofold (4410 versus 2550 nmol.hr/L). Plasma half-life and steady-state plasma concentration were significantly longer and higher, respectively, in poor metabolizers than in extensive metabolizers (41 versus 16 hours and 151 versus 81 nmol/L). Paroxetine pharmacokinetics were linear in poor metabolizers and nonlinear only in extensive metabolizers. Sparteine metabolic ratio (MR = 12 hour urinary ratio of sparteine/dehydrosparteine), increased during treatment with paroxetine in subjects who were extensive metabolizers, and after 14 days treatment two extensive metabolizers were phenotyped as poor metabolizers and the remaining extensive metabolizers were changed into extremely slow extensive metabolizers with sparteine MRs of 5.7 to 16.5. The inhibition of sparteine metabolism was rapidly reversed after cessation of paroxetine administration. In the poor metabolizers there were no significant changes in MRs during the study. It is concluded that paroxetine and sparteine metabolism cosegregates, but the interphenotype difference in metabolism was less prominent at steady state than after a single dose, presumably because of saturation of the sparteine oxygenase (CYP2D6) in subjects who were extensive metabolizers. Paroxetine is a potent inhibitor of sparteine oxidation by CYP2D6 in vivo.

The mephenytoin oxidation polymorphism is partially responsible for the N-demethylation of imipramine

The metabolism of imipramine in six poor metabolizers of mephenytoin was compared with the metabolism of 16 extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin from an earlier study. Each subject was given single doses of 100 mg imipramine hydrochloride and 100 mg desipramine hydrochloride on separate occasions. Imipramine demethylation clearance was 0.74 L.min-1 (mean; range, 0.31-1.24) in poor metabolizers of mephenytoin compared with 1.43 L.min-1 (mean; range, 0.61-3.81) in extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin (p = 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). It has previously been shown that the imipramine clearance by way of other pathways and desipramine oral clearance, both largely representing 2-hydroxylation, are considerably lower in poor metabolizers of sparteine than in extensive metabolizers of sparteine. In contrast, five subjects who were poor metabolizers of mephenytoin and extensive metabolizers of sparteine and a control group of 11 subjects who were extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin and sparteine showed no statistically significant difference with regard to these parameters. One subject who was a poor metabolizer of mephenytoin and sparteine had the lowest imipramine oral clearance of all 22 subjects studied. In conclusion, this and an earlier study show that the oxidation of imipramine is mediated by means of two different polymorphic P450 isozymes, 2-hydroxylation by way of the sparteine oxygenase (P450IID6) and demethylation by way of the mephenytoin oxygenase (P450IIC8).

Nonlinear Kinetics of Imipramine in Low and Medium Plasma Level Ranges

Steady state plasma concentrations of imipramine and desipramine were studied at three to nine different imipramine dose levels in 17 extensive metabolizers of sparteine and at two dose levels in two poor metabolizers of sparteine, all treated for diabetic neuropathy symptoms. The imipramine doses were changed stepwise from doses yielding plasma concentrations of imipramine plus desipramine below 150 nM, up to doses yielding therapeutic drug levels of at least 300-500 nM. The imipramine doses required to achieve therapeutic drug levels was 20 or 25 mg/day in the two poor metabolizers and 50-350 mg/day in the extensive metabolizers. In the extensive metabolizers, the concentration/dose ratio increased for imipramine and desipramine with increasing dose. Dose adjustments based on a simple linear prediction from drug levels at initial dose (50 or 75 mg imipramine/day) thus would result in 0-130% (median, 20%) overestimates, most pronounced in patients with initial low steady state levels. The nonlinear kinetics of imipramine thus may be a significant clinical problem in patients treated for diabetic neuropathy symptoms.

Evidence for polymorphic oxidation of sparteine in Japanese subjects.

The metabolism of sparteine which exhibits a genetic polymorphism in Caucasians was studied in 84 unrelated Japanese subjects. In contrast to a recent study where debrisoquine was used as a probe and no poor metabolizers could be observed in Japanese involving 100 subjects, two subjects had a urinary metabolic ratio of sparteine greater than 20 and thus were poor metabolizers of sparteine. The incidence of poor metabolizer phenotype of sparteine oxidation of 2% seems to be lower in Japanese as compared with various Caucasian populations where 5 to 10% are poor metabolizers of sparteine. However, this is not conclusive, because the 95% confidence interval of the observed frequency, 0.6 to 8%, covers the range reported in the literature for Caucasians.

Pharmacokinetics of N-propylajmaline in relation to polymorphic sparteine oxidation.

In order to determine whether the metabolism of the antiarrhythmic drug N-propylajmaline is under the same genetic control as sparteine metabolism, the pharmacokinetics of this antiarrhythmic drug were studied in a groups of six extensive and four poor metabolizers of sparteine. Pronounced differences in terminal half-life, total plasma clearance, metabolic clearance and urinary excretion of N-propylajmaline were observed between extensive and poor metabolizers. A close relationship between the total clearance and metabolic clearance of N-propylajmaline and sparteine could be demonstrated. Clinically available N-propylajmaline is a 55% to 45% mixture of the i- and n-diastereomers. The extensive metabolizers exhibited stereoselective metabolism; the i-diastereomer was preferentially metabolized. Poor metabolizers were characterized by a loss of this stereoselective metabolism. Five subjects were treated for 7 days with a daily N-propylajmaline dosage of either 60 mg or 20 mg. Since a close relationship between the clearance of N-propylajmaline and the metabolic ratio of sparteine had been observed after single dosing the metabolic ratio of sparteine was used to predict N-propylajmaline steady-state plasma concentrations during multiple dosing. Only in two extensive metabolizers with a metabolic ratio less than 0.4 predicted and observed, steady-state plasma concentrations were in good agreement. In the other three subjects observed steady-state plasma concentrations were appreciably higher than predicted. In these three subjects metabolic N-propylajmaline clearance decreased indicating saturation N-propylajmaline metabolism during multiple dosing. The data indicate that N-propylajmaline metabolism is subject to a genetic polymorphism controlled by the sparteine/debrisoquine gene locus.

Mephenytoin and sparteine pharmacogenetics in Canadian Caucasians.

The frequency of genetically deficient hydroxylation of mephenytoin (M-defect) was studied in 83 healthy Caucasians living in Toronto. The M-defect was compared with the widely studied genetic polymorphism of sparteine/debrisoquine oxidations (S-defect). After ingestion of mephenytoin and sparteine, urine samples (0 to 24 hr) were analyzed for p(4')-hydroxymephenytoin and urine samples over 0 to 12 hr were analyzed for sparteine and 2-and 5-dehydrosparteine by gas chromatographic methods. Nirvanol, the N-demethylation product of mephenytoin, was determined by a newly developed gas chromatographic/mass spectrometric method. Frequency distributions of both p-hydroxymephenytoin and dehydrosparteine excreted in urine were discontinuous (bimodal), while nirvanol and sparteine data were normally distributed. Two poor metabolizers of mephenytoin excreted 2% to 3% of the dose as p-hydroxymephenytoin and excreted normal amounts of nirvanol, but they were extensive metabolizers of sparteine. Six poor metabolizers of sparteine were found to be extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin (34% to 42% excreted in urine as p-hydroxyme-phenytoin). Thus the M-defect occurs among Canadian Caucasians with a frequency of 2% (0.0% to 7.5% with a confidence limit of 99%) and is independent of the S-defect.