Pooled Analysis Of Clinical Trials Research Articles

Efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa on forced vital capacity percent predicted in treatment-naïve patients with late-onset Pompe disease: A pooled analysis of clinical trials

BackgroundThe efficacy of avalglucosidase alfa (AVA) versus alglucosidase alfa (ALG) on forced vital capacity percent predicted (FVCpp) in patients with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD) has been assessed in the Phase 3 COMET trial (NCT02782741). Due to the rarity of LOPD and thus small sample size in COMET, additional data were analyzed to gain further insights into the efficacy of AVA versus ALG. MethodsData from treatment-naive patients with LOPD were pooled from COMET and Phase 1/2 NEO1/NEO-EXT (NCT01898364/NCT02032524) trials for patients treated with AVA, and Phase 3 LOTS trial (NCT00158600) for patients treated with ALG. Regression analyses using mixed models with repeated measures consistent with those pre-specified in COMET were performed post-hoc. Analyses were adjusted for trials and differences in baseline characteristics. Four models were developed: Model 1 considered all trials; Model 2 included Phase 3 trials; Model 3 included Phase 3 trials and was adjusted for baseline ventilation use; Model 4 included COMET and NEO1/NEO-EXT (i.e., AVA trials only). ResultsOverall, 100 randomized patients from COMET (AVA, n = 51, ALG, n = 49), 60 from LOTS (ALG arm only), and three patients from NEO1/NEO-EXT (who received open-label AVA only) were considered for analysis. Mean age at enrollment was similar across trials (45.3–50.3 years); however, patients from LOTS had a longer mean duration of disease versus COMET and NEO1/NEO-EXT trials (9.0 years and 0.5–2.2 years, respectively) and younger mean age at diagnosis (36.2 years and 44.7–48.6 years, respectively). Least squares mean (95% confidence interval) improvement from baseline in FVCpp at Week 49–52 for AVA versus ALG was 2.43 (−0.13; 4.99) for COMET (n = 98); 2.31 (0.06; 4.57) for Model 1 (n = 160); 2.43 (0.21; 4.65) for Model 2 (n = 157); 2.80 (0.54; 5.05) for Model 3 (n = 154); and 2.27 (−0.30; 4.45) for Model 4 (n = 101). ConclusionsModels 1 to 3, which had an increased sample size versus COMET, demonstrated a nominally significant effect on FVCpp favoring AVA versus ALG after 1 year of treatment, consistent with results from COMET.

Neoadjuvant Dual Checkpoint Inhibitors vs Anti-PD1 Therapy in High-Risk Resectable Melanoma

Despite the clear potential benefits of neoadjuvant therapy, the optimal neoadjuvant regimen for patients with high-risk resectable melanoma (HRRM) is not known. To compare the safety and efficacy of dual checkpoint inhibitors with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (anti-PD1) therapy in a neoadjuvant setting among patients with HRRM. In this pooled analysis of clinical trials, studies were selected provided they investigated immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment, were published between January 2018 and March 2023, and were phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical trials. Participant data included in the analysis were derived from trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of anti-PD1 monotherapy and the combination of anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein-4 with anti-PD1 in the neoadjuvant setting, specifically among patients with HRRM. Patients were treated with either anti-PD1 monotherapy; dual checkpoint inhibition (DCPI) with a conventional dose of 3-mg/kg ipilimumab and 1-mg/kg nivolumab; or DCPI with an alternative-dose regimen of 1-mg/kg ipilimumab and 3-mg/kg nivolumab. The main outcomes were radiologic complete response (rCR), radiologic overall objective response (rOOR), and radiologic progressive disease. Also, pathologic complete response (pCR), the proportion of patients undergoing surgical resection, and occurrence of grade 3 or 4 immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were considered. Among 573 patients enrolled in 6 clinical trials, neoadjuvant therapy with DCPI was associated with higher odds of achieving pCR compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy (odds ratio [OR], 3.16; P < .001). DCPI was associated with higher odds of grade 3 or 4 irAEs compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy (OR, 3.75; P < .001). When comparing the alternative-dose ipilimumab and nivolumab (IPI-NIVO) regimen with conventional-dose IPI-NIVO, no statistically significant difference in rCR, rOOR, radiologic progressive disease, or pCR was noted. However, the conventional-dose IPI-NIVO regimen was associated with increased grade 3 or 4 irAEs (OR, 4.76; P < .001). Conventional-dose IPI-NIVO was associated with greater odds of achieving improved rOOR (OR, 1.95; P = .046) and pCR (OR, 2.99; P < .001) compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy. The alternative dose of IPI-NIVO also was associated with higher odds of achieving rCR (OR, 2.55; P = .03) and pCR (OR, 3.87; P < .001) compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy. The risk for grade 3 or 4 irAEs is higher with both the conventional-dose (OR, 9.59; P < .001) and alternative-dose IPI-NIVO regimens (OR, 2.02; P = .02) compared with anti-PD1 monotherapy. In this pooled analysis of 6 clinical trials, although DCPI was associated with increased likelihood of achieving pathological and radiologic responses, the associated risk for grade 3 or 4 irAEs was significantly lower with anti-PD1 monotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting for HRRM. Additionally, compared with alternative-dose IPI-NIVO, the conventional dose of IPI-NIVO was associated with increased risk for grade 3 or 4 irAEs, with no significant distinctions in radiologic or pathologic efficacy.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer: protocol of a pooled analysis of clinical trials.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cause of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) is a distinct molecular subtype of CRC that occurs in approximately 15% of all cases. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have emerged as a promising therapeutic approach for patients with MSI-H colorectal cancer, exhibiting higher response rates than standard chemotherapies. To assess the effectiveness and safety of ICIs for the treatment of patients with MSI-H CRC, we propose a comprehensive pooled analysis of clinical trial data. A systematic search of multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials.gov, will be conducted from their inception until September, 2023 to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies. Inclusion criteria comprise studies of adult patients with histologically confirmed MSI-H CRC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, with a comparison to a control group receiving conventional therapies. Outcomes of interest will be overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (AEs). The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool will be employed to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. A random-effects model using the DerSimonian and Laird method will be applied for pooling the effect estimates, calculating hazard ratios (HRs) or risk ratios (RRs) with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity will be assessed using I² statistics, and subgroup analysis and meta-regression will be performed to explore potential effect modifiers in case of substantial heterogeneity. Publication bias will be evaluated with funnel plots and Egger's test. Sensitivity analysis will be conducted to assess the robustness of the results. This meta-analysis will synthesize available evidence from clinical trials on immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating MSI-H colorectal cancer. The findings will offer valuable information about the effectiveness and safety of ICIs in this patient population, contributing to the refinement of clinical guidelines and enhancing the decision-making process for healthcare providers, policy-makers, and patients. The comprehensive analysis of subgroups and sensitivity allows for an in-depth understanding of potential effect modification, providing essential directions for future research. This study will involve the use of published data; hence, ethical approval is not required. The results of the study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at relevant conferences. The findings will potentially impact clinical decision-making and contribute to the development of evidence-based treatment recommendations for patients with MSI-H colorectal cancer. Open Science Framework identifier, 10.17605/OSF.IO/ZHJ85.

Estimated Lifetime Gained With Cancer Screening Tests

Cancer screening tests are promoted to save life by increasing longevity, but it is unknown whether people will live longer with commonly used cancer screening tests. To estimate lifetime gained with cancer screening. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of randomized clinical trials with more than 9 years of follow-up reporting all-cause mortality and estimated lifetime gained for 6 commonly used cancer screening tests, comparing screening with no screening. The analysis included the general population. MEDLINE and the Cochrane library databases were searched, and the last search was performed October 12, 2022. Mammography screening for breast cancer; colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy, or fecal occult blood testing (FOBT) for colorectal cancer; computed tomography screening for lung cancer in smokers and former smokers; or prostate-specific antigen testing for prostate cancer. Searches and selection criteria followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline. Data were independently extracted by a single observer, and pooled analysis of clinical trials was used for analyses. Life-years gained by screening was calculated as the difference in observed lifetime in the screening vs the no screening groups and computed absolute lifetime gained in days with 95% CIs for each screening test from meta-analyses or single randomized clinical trials. In total, 2 111 958 individuals enrolled in randomized clinical trials comparing screening with no screening using 6 different tests were eligible. Median follow-up was 10 years for computed tomography, prostate-specific antigen testing, and colonoscopy; 13 years for mammography; and 15 years for sigmoidoscopy and FOBT. The only screening test with a significant lifetime gain was sigmoidoscopy (110 days; 95% CI, 0-274 days). There was no significant difference following mammography (0 days: 95% CI, -190 to 237 days), prostate cancer screening (37 days; 95% CI, -37 to 73 days), colonoscopy (37 days; 95% CI, -146 to 146 days), FOBT screening every year or every other year (0 days; 95% CI, -70.7 to 70.7 days), and lung cancer screening (107 days; 95% CI, -286 days to 430 days). The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that current evidence does not substantiate the claim that common cancer screening tests save lives by extending lifetime, except possibly for colorectal cancer screening with sigmoidoscopy.

Hypophosphataemia risk associated with ferric carboxymaltose in heart failure: A pooled analysis of clinical trials.

Iron deficiency is a common finding among patients with heart failure (HF) and is associated with adverse outcomes, including decreased quality of life, increased risk of hospitalization, and decreased survival. Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) has been shown to improve outcomes among patients with HF and concomitant iron deficiency, but FCM is associated with an increased risk of hypophosphataemia. We aimed to better characterize this risk among HF populations. This pooled analysis examined data from 41 studies of adults with iron deficiency across disease states and therapeutic areas. Among the 7931 patients treated with FCM available for analysis, 14% made up the HF subgroup. Additional subgroups included women's health (36%), non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD; 27%), haemodialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (HD-CKD; 1%), gastrointestinal (10%), neurology (3%), and other (10%). The incidence of post-baseline moderate or severe hypophosphataemia (i.e. serum phosphate [PO4 3- ] level <2.0mg/dL) varied across the therapeutic areas, with the lowest incidences observed in the HD-CKD (0%), HF (8.1%), and NDD-CKD (12.8%) subgroups. The prevalence of moderate or severe hypophosphataemia among the women's health, other, gastrointestinal, and neurology subgroups was 30.1%, 40.6%, 51.0%, and 55.6%, respectively. In the HF subgroup, one patient (<0.1%) had a serum PO4 3- of <1.0mg/dL recorded, compared with 4.8% and 4.0% of the subjects in the neurology and gastrointestinal groups, respectively. With the exception of the HD-CKD subgroup, mean serum PO4 3- levels decreased through weeks 2 to 4, and then returned toward baseline and plateaued by week 8. The strongest predictor of hypophosphataemia was preserved kidney function (estimated glomerular filtration rate: >60mL/min/1.73m2 vs. <30mL/min/1.73m2 ; odds ratio: 12.2). Among patients in the HF subgroup, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events potentially related to hypophosphataemia (e.g. cardiac failure, ventricular tachyarrhythmias, fatigue, muscle weakness, bone pain, neurological symptoms, and muscle pain) was lower among FCM-treated patients than among those receiving placebo, and lower among patients with a post-baseline PO4 3- <2mg/dL vs. those not meeting such criteria. The risk of laboratory-assessed hypophosphataemia in HF patients treated with FCM was lower than that seen in patients in other therapeutic areas treated with FCM, and clinical events associated with hypophosphataemia are uncommon with FCM therapy in this population. Appropriate monitoring, particularly soon after administration in the unlikely event of repeated dosing in HF patients, will allow for further refinement of management strategies. [Correction added on 24 February 2023, after first online publication: In the preceding sentence, "…administration, will allow…" has been corrected to "…administration in the unlikely event of repeated dosing in HF patients, will allow…" in this version.].

A review of cognitive and behavioral outcomes of Brivaracetam.

Anti-seizure medications (ASMs) can cause cognitive or behavioral adverse drug reactions, which is an important consideration when selecting an appropriate ASM. Brivaracetam (BRV) is a newer synaptic vesicle protein 2A ligand, which is expected to result in fewer neuropsychiatric adverse effects due to its mechanism of action. To understand the impact of BRV on cognition and behavior compared with other ASMs, we conducted a review of the literature using the Cochrane Library, PubMed/MEDLINE, and Embase. After the screening process, a total of two animal studies, one randomized controlled trial, one pooled analysis of clinical trials, one controlled study, and nine observational studies were included. The animal studies showed that BRV did not worsen cognitive or behavioral performance in rodents. The human studies showed that BRV was associated with fewer cognitive adverse events compared with other second- or third-generation ASMs. In addition, BRV was less associated with behavioral disturbance than levetiracetam. In summary, this review revealed that BRV has a limited impact on cognition and behavior. For patients who are intolerant to levetiracetam and have levetiracetam-related behavioral side effects, switching to BRV could be beneficial. However, heterogeneity between studies resulted in low-quality of evidence, and further trials are needed to confirm the findings.

1616P The mortality burden of cachexia in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review

Cancer-associated cachexia is a multifactorial wasting disorder that includes anorexia, involuntary weight loss (WL) and decreased skeletal muscle mass, and is an indicator of poor prognosis. As such, international consensus (IC) diagnostic criteria for cancer cachexia have been proposed (Fearon et al., Lancet Oncol 2011;12:489–95). This systematic literature review (SLR) examined the relationship between cachexia and survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The SLR was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Embase® and PubMed were searched to identify articles published in English between 1 Jan 2016 and 10 Oct 2021 reporting survival in adults with cancer and cachexia or at risk of cachexia, as defined by IC criteria or a broader definition of any WL. Included publications were of randomized/non-randomized clinical trials and retrospective/prospective observational studies in ≥100 patients with NSCLC. Forty-two publications in patients with NSCLC met eligibility criteria (41 observational studies; 1 pooled analysis of clinical trials). Included studies were primarily from Europe (40%), Asia (21%) or the United States (19%). Twelve studies (29%) reported cachexia using IC criteria and 30 studies reported either any WL or WL >5%. Four studies reported prevalence of cachexia, which ranged from 5.3% to 48.1%. Thirty-one studies reported prevalence of any WL; of these, 16 studies reported prevalence of WL ≥5% (prevalence range: 7.4%–58.9%). An association between survival and cachexia/WL was assessed across 41 studies that used multivariate (n=34) or univariate (n=7) analyses. Cachexia/WL was associated with a statistically significantly poorer survival in 30 of 34 studies (88.2%) that used multivariate analyses. This SLR found that less than a third of studies used the IC criteria to identify cachexia in the context of NSCLC. Nonetheless, cachexia/WL was associated with significantly poorer survival in these patients. An awareness of cachexia in NSCLC would allow early implementation of disease management strategies that may improve prognosis in these patients.

Characterization of low-grade arthralgia, myalgia, and musculoskeletal pain with ibrutinib therapy: pooled analysis of clinical trials in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and mantle cell lymphoma

Joint and muscle pain, including arthralgia, myalgia, and musculoskeletal pain, are among the common adverse events (AEs) reported for ibrutinib, a once-daily Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of various B-cell malignancies, including chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). This pooled analysis from nine clinical trials of ibrutinib in CLL and MCL (N = 1178) evaluated patterns of these AEs. Any grade arthralgia, myalgia, and musculoskeletal pain occurred in 18%, 10%, and 6% of patients, respectively. AEs were primarily low-grade (grade 1/2: 97‒99%) and occurred during the first year of treatment; most resolved (67%–80%) at first occurrence. Few (<5%) patients required ibrutinib dose modification; no patients discontinued ibrutinib due to these AEs. Among patients evaluated for concomitant medication use, all those receiving concomitant medications after the first AE occurrence experienced AE resolution. These data suggest that these AEs were not treatment-limiting during ibrutinib therapy.

Pattern of treatment failures in patients with central nervous system non-germinomatous germ cell tumors (CNS-NGGCT): A pooled analysis of clinical trials.

Central Nervous System Non-Germinomatous Germ Cell Tumors (CNS-NGGCT) are rare but curable tumors. Due to their rarity, patients with treatment failures remain a poorly characterized group with unfavorable outcomes. In this study, we sought to characterize patients with treatment failures in a large, prospectively treated cohort. European and North American clinical trials for patients with CNS-NGGCT (SIOP-GCT-96, SFOP-TGM-TC 90/92, COG-ACNS0122, and COG-ACNS1123) were pooled for analysis. Additionally, patients included and treated in the UK and France national registries under strict protocol guidelines were included as an independent, non-overlapping cohort. A total of 118 patients experienced a treatment failure. Twenty-four patients had progressive disease during therapy, and additional 11 patients were diagnosed with growing teratoma syndrome (GTS). Patients with GTS are significantly younger and present with local failures and negative tumor markers. Eighty-three individuals experienced disease relapses after treatment ended. Patients' metastatic relapses presented significantly earlier than local relapses and were associated with tumor marker elevation (OR: 4.39; P = .026). In our analysis, focal or whole-ventricular radiation therapy was not associated with an increased risk of metastatic relapses. Herein, we present the largest pooled dataset of prospectively treated patients with relapsed CNS-NGGCT. Our study identified younger age and negative tumor markers to be characteristic of GTS. Additionally, we elucidated that metastatic relapses occur earlier than local relapses are associated with elevated tumor markers and are not associated with the field of radiation therapy. These findings are of utmost importance for the planning of future clinical trials and the implementation of surveillance strategies in these patients.

Risk of hypertension in erenumab-treated patients with migraine: Analyses of clinical trial and postmarketing data.

ObjectiveTo assess the risk of hypertension in patients with migraine who received erenumab in clinical trials and in the postmarketing setting.BackgroundErenumab is a monoclonal antibody for migraine prevention that targets the calcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) receptor. Hypertension is a theoretical risk for inhibitors of the CGRP pathway. Although no evidence of an association between erenumab treatment and hypertension was observed during the clinical development program, adverse events (AEs) of hypertension have been identified in the postmarketing setting.MethodsSafety data from four phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials were used to perform a pooled analysis of hypertension AEs in patients with migraine receiving erenumab. Postmarketing AEs of hypertension were identified from the Amgen Global Safety database from May 17, 2018, through January 31, 2020.ResultsIn the pooled analysis of clinical trials, hypertension AEs (placebo, 9/1043 [0.9%]; erenumab 70 mg, 7/893 [0.8%]; erenumab 140 mg, 1/507 [0.2%]) and percentage of patients initiating medication to treat hypertension (12/1043 [1.2%], 7/893 [0.8%], 1/507 [0.2%], respectively) were similar across treatment groups. A total of 362 AEs of hypertension were identified from the postmarketing setting, 26.2% (95/362) of which were serious, >245,000 patient‐years of exposure. The exposure‐adjusted incidence of hypertension was 0.144 per 100 patient‐years.ConclusionsClinical trials did not demonstrate an increased risk of hypertension with erenumab compared with placebo, and AE rates of hypertension reported with erenumab in the postmarketing setting were generally low. Additional data are needed to fully characterize the extent to which hypertension is a risk associated with erenumab.

PNS110 Compliance with Epro Is High and Consistent across Age Groups with Patients Using Their Own Smartphones in FULLY Decentralized Clinical Trials

Electronic patient reported outcomes (ePRO) have been collected for use in clinical trials on provisioned, locked-down devices for decades. However, only more recently has it become feasible to collect ePRO using “bring your own device” (BYOD) models in which patients are using their smartphones to complete required study assessments. Whether or not patients would sufficiently comply with electronic symptoms diaries on their own smartphones has been an open question. Herein, we show the results from pooled analysis of clinical trials in which patients completed diaries using their smartphones. There were patients (n=176) across 2 studies (dermatology and women’s health) who completed questionnaires electronically either daily or weekly for 12 weeks using the Obvio-19 app on their personal smartphones (Android or iOS) to report their symptoms. Participants’ used their smartphones consisting of 43.8% Android, 50.6% iOS, and 5.7% unidentified ranging in age from 35 to 65. Questionnaires (n=12,274) were completed. The overall average compliance for completion of electronic questionnaires on a daily or weekly schedule was 92.3% + 11.9%. The ePRO questionnaire compliance was 93.6% + 10.6% for ages 35 to 50 (n=85) and 91.0% + 13.0% for ages 51 to 65 (n=91) with a p value of 0.16 between groups, indicating that there was no impact of age on ePRO questionnaire compliance on their personal smartphones. Further, compliance was consistently high and stable throughout the duration of the 12-week studies. In summary, these data demonstrate that patients using their personal smartphones consistently completed their ePRO symptoms questionnaires at an overall compliance in excess of 92% and that the age of the participant did not affect the compliance rate suggesting that the more mature participant is not affected by the ever-growing use of technology in the industry.

Cost-Effectiveness of Tisagenlecleucel in Paediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukaemia (pALL) and Adult Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) in Switzerland.

The purpose of the present analysis was to explore the cost-effectiveness of tisagenlecleucel in relapsed or refractory (r/r) paediatric acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (pALL) and r/r adult diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in Switzerland against a range of historical standard-of-care treatments. Two cost-utility models were constructed for the two licensed indications using similar methodologies but indication-specific data. Clinical efficacy data were based on pooled analyses of clinical trials for tisagenlecleucel (pALL: ELIANA, ENSIGN, B2101J; DLBCL: JULIET, NCT02030834) and published data for comparator treatments. Treatment effects were compared based on matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) analyses. Four clinical lymphoma and leukaemia experts provided Switzerland-specific input regarding comparators, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, clinical evidence and costs, which were used to inform the models. The base case analysis reflected the perspective of the Swiss mandatory health insurance system. Deterministic, probabilistic and scenario analyses were carried out to explore the robustness of results. The base case analysis resulted in incremental costs of CHF 31,961-CHF 36,419 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained for pALL across the different comparators and CHF 113,179 for DLBCL (1 CHF = 1.09 USD). Incremental costs per life-year gained ranged between CHF 33,906-CHF 97,399 across the two indications. Including productivity gains, tisagenlecleucel was shown to be dominant (more effective and less costly) over all the comparators for pALL and to result in incremental costs per life-year gained of CHF 57,324 for DLBCL. Using hypothetical willingness-to-pay thresholds of CHF 100,000-150,000 per QALY gained, the present analysis has shown tisagenlecleucel to be a cost-effective treatment option in pALL and DLBCL.

Post-radical prostatectomy (RP) outcome for patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with intense neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NHT): Results of a pooled analysis of contemporary clinical trials.

238 Background: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer have an increased risk of recurrence and death from prostate cancer. Intense NHT prior to RP has been associated with favorable pathologic responses in a subset of patients with high-risk disease. We conducted a pooled analysis of post-RP outcomes of four, multicenter, randomized, clinical trials of intense NHT prior to RP. Methods: All patients included were enrolled on trials evaluating intense NHT followed by RP. The primary endpoint was time to biochemical recurrence (BCR), defined as the time from RP to prostate specific antigen (PSA) &gt;0.1 ng/mL or start of first post-RP therapy. Secondary endpoints included metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), and time to testosterone recovery. We evaluated outcomes in the overall population, favorable responders (defined as a pathologic complete response or minimum residual disease ≤ 5 mm at RP), and non-responders. We correlated pathologic parameters, including RP pathologic response, PTEN status, ERG status, and presence of intraductal carcinoma with BCR. Results: 121 patients were included of whom 78.5% (n=95) had high-risk disease by NCCN risk categories. Following NHT, 20.7% (n=25) had 0-5 mm of residual tumor (including 9.1%, n=11, with pathologic complete response). Overall, 52 patients (43.0%) experienced BCR, of whom two were exceptional responders (Table). Testosterone recovery was observed in 94.0% of patients (n=109/116). PTEN loss and presence of intraductal carcinoma were associated with shorter time to BCR. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis of clinical trials, we demonstrate that patients who achieve a favorable pathologic response to NHT prior to RP experienced a decreased PSA relapse rate and prolonged time to BCR. Larger residual tumor volumes and tissue-based parameters, including PTEN loss and intraductal carcinoma, were associated with BCR. Additional follow-up is warranted to evaluate the impact on long-term outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT00298155; NCT00924469; NCT01547299; NCT02268175 . [Table: see text]

Venous Thromboembolism in Lymphoma: Risk Stratification and Antithrombotic Prophylaxis.

Lymphoma is listed among the neoplasias with a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Risk factors for VTE appear to differ from risk factors in solid tumors. We review the literature of the last 20 years for reports identifying these risk factors in cohorts consisting exclusively of lymphoma patients. We selected 25 publications. The most frequent studies were analyses of retrospective single-center cohorts. We also included two reports of pooled analyses of clinical trials, two meta-analyses, two analyses of patient registries, and three analyses of population-based databases. The VTE risk is the highest upfront during the first two months after lymphoma diagnosis and decreases over time. This upfront risk may be related to tumor burden and the start of chemotherapy as contributing factors. Factors consistently reported as VTE risk factors are aggressive histology, a performance status ECOG ≥ 2 leading to increased immobility, more extensive disease, and localization to particular sites, such as central nervous system (CNS) and mediastinal mass. Association between laboratory values that are part of risk assessment models in solid tumors and VTE risk in lymphomas are very inconsistent. Recently, VTE risk scores for lymphoma were developed that need further validation, before they can be used for risk stratification and primary prophylaxis. Knowledge of VTE risk factors in lymphomas may help in the evaluation of the individual risk-benefit ratio of prophylaxis and help to design prospective studies on primary prophylaxis in lymphoma.

Risk factors for severe rash with use of vemurafenib alone or in combination with cobimetinib for advanced melanoma: pooled analysis of clinical trials

BackgroundRash is one of the most common severe adverse events associated with use of vemurafenib for the treatment of melanoma, either as monotherapy or in combination with cobimetinib. The study aimed to identify pre-treatment patient characteristics predictive of developing severe rash with vemurafenib therapy.MethodsThis was a secondary pooled analysis of individual patient data from the BRIM-2, BRIM-3 and coBRIM clinical trials, including all patients treated with vemurafenib alone and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Patient age, sex, performance status, body weight, body mass index, liver function markers and estimated glomerular filtration rate were assessed for association with development of severe (grade 3 or 4) rash using logistic regression.ResultsOf 962 patients treated with vemurafenib, 150 (16%) patients experienced severe rash. Female sex was identified as a significant risk factor for severe rash development (P < 0.001), having a two-fold increased risk compared to males (22% vs 11%, odds ratio [OR] 2.17; 95% CI 1.52 to 3.09). Low body weight was also associated with increased risk of severe rash (P = 0.002), but this association was not significant after adjustment for sex. The association between sex and risk of severe rash was consistent across clinical trials and treatments (vemurafenib monotherapy, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib).ConclusionFemales had approximately two-fold increased risk of developing severe rash compared to males in clinical trials of vemurafenib alone or in combination with cobimetinib.

Adherence to pan-genotypic glecaprevir/pibrentasvir and efficacy in HCV-infected patients: A pooled analysis of clinical trials.

Background & AimsAdequate adherence to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is believed to be a key component of treatment success because non‐adherence can potentially result in treatment failure and the emergence of resistant viral variants. This analysis assessed factors associated with non‐adherence to glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) therapy and the impact of non‐adherence on sustained virological response at post‐treatment week 12 (SVR12) rates in HCV genotype (GT) 1‐6‐infected patients.MethodsAdherence was calculated by pill counts at study visits during treatment, and defined as having a lowest treatment adherence of ≥80% and ≤120% at each study visit. Exploratory logistic regression modelling assessed predictors of non‐adherence to G/P therapy. SVR12 rates by treatment adherence were assessed in the intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population and modified ITT (mITT) population, which excludes non‐virological failures.ResultsOverall, 97% (2024/2091) of patients were adherent to G/P therapy at all consecutive study visits. Alcohol use was the only baseline characteristic independently associated with non‐adherence to G/P therapy (OR: 2.38; 95% CI: 1.13‐5.01; P = .022). In the mITT population, overall SVR12 rates were high both in patients who were adherent to G/P therapy and those who were not (99% [1983/2008] and 95% [58/61] respectively; P = .047). Corresponding SVR12 rates in the ITT population were 98% (1983/2024) and 87% (58/67) respectively.ConclusionsMost patients adhered to G/P therapy. SVR12 rates were high both in patients who were adherent to G/P treatment and those who were not. Patient education on treatment adherence should remain an important part of HCV treatment.Clinical trials registrationNCT02604017, NCT02640482, NCT02640157, NCT02636595, NCT02642432, NCT02651194, NCT02243293, NCT02446717.

Effects of the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor dapagliflozin on estimated plasma volume in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AimsTo compare the effects of the sodium‐glucose co‐transporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitor dapagliflozin on estimated (ePV) and measured plasma volume (mPV) and to characterize the effects of dapagliflozin on ePV in a broad population of patients with type 2 diabetes.Materials and methodsThe Strauss formula was used to calculate changes in ePV. Change in plasma volume measured with 125I‐human serum albumin (mPV) was compared with change in ePV in 10 patients with type 2 diabetes randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg/d or placebo. Subsequently, changes in ePV were measured in a pooled database of 13 phase 2b/3 placebo‐controlled clinical trials involving 4533 patients with type 2 diabetes who were randomized to dapagliflozin 10 mg daily or matched placebo.ResultsThe median change in ePV was similar to the median change in mPV (−9.4% and −9.0%) during dapagliflozin treatment. In the pooled analysis of clinical trials, dapagliflozin decreased ePV by 9.6% (95% confidence interval 9.0 to 10.2) compared to placebo after 24 weeks. This effect was consistent in various patient subgroups, including subgroups with or without diuretic use or established cardiovascular disease.ConclusionsePV may be used as a proxy to assess changes in plasma volume during dapagliflozin treatment. Dapagliflozin consistently decreased ePV compared to placebo in a broad population of patients with type 2 diabetes.

Duration of Oxaliplatin-Containing Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline.

To develop recommendations for duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin for patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer based on the results of trials of 3 months compared with 6 months of treatment. ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of relevant studies. The guideline recommendations were based on the review of evidence by the Expert Panel. Pooled data from the six International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) Collaboration randomized controlled trials comprise the evidence base for these guideline recommendations. The recommendations for therapy duration apply to patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer who are being offered adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and a fluoropyrimidine. Recommendations are informed by the findings of a recent pooled analysis of clinical trials that compared 6 months versus 3 months of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. For patients at a high risk of recurrence (T4 and/or N2), adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered for a duration of 6 months. For patients at a low risk of recurrence (T1, T2, or T3 and N1), either 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy or a shorter duration of 3 months may be offered on the basis of a potential reduction in adverse events and no significant difference in disease-free survival with the 3-month regimen. In determining duration of therapy, the Expert Panel recommends a shared decision-making approach, taking into account patient characteristics, values and preferences, and other factors and including a discussion of the potential for benefit and risks of harm associated with treatment duration. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Psychometric Properties of Apathy Scales in Dementia: A Systematic Review.

Apathy is a prevalent and problematic neuropsychiatric symptom in those with dementia that is emerging as a treatment target, necessitating accurate assessment. While many apathy scales are available, not all have been developed for use exclusively in dementia, and psychometric properties may vary across different populations. This systematic review aimed to provide an overview of the psychometric properties of apathy scales used in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias, as well as rate the methodological quality of supporting studies. In addition, for those scales identified, performance in clinical trials was reviewed. A search was conducted through Medline, Psychinfo, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Articles that reported psychometric properties of an apathy scale in an AD or mixed dementia population were included. Of 15 articles, the methodological quality ratings of the studies ranged from adequate to excellent. Three clinical trials and two pooled analyses of clinical trials were included that used apathy scales evaluated in this review. Three scales emerged. The Neuropsychiatric Inventory apathy subscale (NPI-apathy) and the Apathy Evaluation Scale (AES) had the greatest number of studies evaluating psychometric properties and were also used in the clinical trials and have shown sensitivity to change. The Dementia Apathy Interview and Rating demonstrated excellent values of internal consistency, validity, and reliability for use in an AD population. Future research should address comparative scale performance and assess ability to distinguish subtypes of apathy. Validation may include evaluation of performance against specific imaging defined deficits.

Atypical Infections in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients Treated with Ibrutinib

Ibrutinib is an oral Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor with clinical efficacy in several B cell malignancies. In a pooled analysis of clinical trials evaluating ibrutinib, grade 3-4 infections were reported in 14% of patients. We screened consecutive patients on ibrutinib therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) for infectious complications. Patients were hospitalized with documented infections uncommon to this patient population including Legionella pneumonia, Campylobacter bacteremia and fatal progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). All patients received prior therapies for CLL/MCL. Immunological evaluation of these patients demonstrated immunoglobulin depression and profound lymphopenia with severe depletion in both B and CD4 T cell counts, suggesting defects in both humoral and T cell mediated immunity. This data support a broader immunosuppressive effect for ibrutinib than initially anticipated. While responding patients may show later recovery of B cell function, profound immunosuppression may occur at earlier treatment time points, particularly in previously treated patients. Closer patient monitoring during the first months of ibrutinib therapy may be desirable.