Polypharmacy In Older Patients Research Articles

The impact of hospitalization on inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy in older patients: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

Polypharmacy and the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in older individuals are widespread phenomena that are associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. The Beers Criteria is a tool that helps to identify patients that are prescribed with PIMs, thereby reducing the risk of associated harm. Amongst other populations, the criteria identify drugs that should not be used by the majority of older patients. Determining the proportion of older inpatients who were discharged from hospitalization with polypharmacy (a prescription for more than seven drugs), or with a PIM as defined by the Beers Criteria. A descriptive cross-sectional study based on patients aged 65 and over who were hospitalized in the years 2019-2021 in the internal medicine, orthopedic and surgical wards at a medium-size hospital. Demographic information and details about drug treatment were collected from the electronic patient records system. Patients who died during hospitalization were excluded from the study group. The proportion of inpatients with polypharmacy or a PIM as part of their regular prescription, at the time of admission and at discharge. 49 564 patients were included in the study cohort. At discharge, 19% of the patients were given a prescription for a PIM, with a small but significant decrease compared with the rate admission (22.1%). At discharge, 42.8% of patients had polypharmacy, representing a small but significant increase compared with the rate on admission (40.6%). The study demonstrated high baseline rates of PIM prescription and polypharmacy. Hospitalization was associated with a decrease in PIM prescription and an increase in polypharmacy. This highlights the importance of medication review during admission to reduce the potential risk to older adults from polypharmacy and PIM prescription.

The development of a Core Outcome Set for clinical trials targeting interventions aiming to improve adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older people – A Delphi consensus study

Abstract Introduction Older people encounter challenges when taking polypharmacy. Different interventions have been applied to improve adherence to polypharmacy. However, there are few high-quality studies, and little consideration has been given to the outcomes selected to measure the effectiveness of interventions.[1] To produce high-quality studies and accurately report adherence-related outcomes, developing a Core Outcome Set (COS) is important.[2] A COS is the minimum number of outcomes that should be reported and measured in future trials in a specific health field to reduce outcomes’ inconsistencies across trials.[2] Aim This study aimed to develop a COS for use in clinical trials aiming at improving adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients. Methods A list of outcomes related to adherence to polypharmacy (n=13) was compiled from previous semi-structured interviews with stakeholders. The Delphi panel consisted of experts in adherence, polypharmacy and gerontology, including journal editors, academics, non-National Health Service doctors, nurses and pharmacists who were identified by searching researchers’ publication profiles using Google Scholar and Scopus. Senior editors and editor-in-chief of peer-reviewed journals were identified by searching journal information. Public members were identified by searching for contact emails of staff members in public charities/organisations representing older people’s healthcare needs (e.g. AgeUK). Additionally, identified participants received invitation emails asking them to forward the email to other participants and experts who might be interested in this study (i.e. snowball sampling). The 13 outcomes were distributed in three online Delphi questionnaires between February and April 2023 using an online SoGoSurvey® platform. All outcomes were rated according to their degree of importance using a nine-point Likert scale (1 to 3 = unimportant; 4 to 6 = important but not critical; 7 to 9 = critical). Following each round, response rates and the distribution of scores were calculated to classify outcomes into ‘consensus in’, ‘consensus out’ and ‘no consensus’. An outcome was considered very important if ≥80% of participants scored it as ‘critical’ and ≤15% scored it as ‘unimportant’. Results The Delphi panel (Round 1, n=57; Round 2, n=53; Round 3, n=50) comprised different professionals, including 38 academics, 23 pharmacists, 12 doctors, six journal editors, three nurses and four public members, some of whom had multiple roles, e.g. doctor and academic. Participants were distributed over four continents, mostly from Europe (n=39). Both Australia and America had identical representation (n=8), while two participants represented Asia. Consensus was reached following the third round on seven outcomes, namely: medication adherence across multiple medications (100.0%), treatment burden (96.2%), health-related quality of life (96.2%), healthcare utilisation (83.0%), adverse events and side effects (83.0%), patient-carer satisfaction (82%), and cost-effectiveness (81.1%). Conclusion Seven outcomes were considered of critical importance to stakeholders. This study is the first to develop a COS for interventions targeting adherence to appropriate polypharmacy in older patients. However, most of our participants were academics and pharmacists from Europe, whilst other participant categories and continents were less well-represented. A future nominal group technique study will be conducted to discuss the results obtained from previous Delphi questionnaires, followed by selecting the appropriate outcome measurement instruments to measure these outcomes.

Polypharmacy in Older Patients: A Three-Year Longitudinal Analysis in Primary Care Settings of Aragón, Spain.

Challenges of polypharmacy and the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in older patients require further investigation. This retrospective study analyzed the progression of polypharmacy and anticholinergic burden in older patients in a primary care setting before, during, and after the COVID-19 pandemic. This 3-year cross-sectional study (2019, 2020, and 2021) comprised a dynamic cohort of individuals aged ≥75 years, who attended the Arrabal Primary Care Center in Zaragoza, Spain. Older patients with polypharmacy (≥5 medications) were identified according to their electronic health records. We collected demographic and clinical data, including medication prescriptions, diagnoses, and anticholinergic risks, and performed descriptive and statistical analyses. This study included a total of 1,928 patients with a mean age of 83.52±0.30 years. Over the 3-year study period, the mean number of medications prescribed increased, from 9.4 in 2019 to 10.4 in 2021. The prevalence of excessive polypharmacy (≥10 medications) increased from 39% in 2019 to 45% in 2021. The most commonly prescribed drugs were anilides, proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepine derivatives, and platelet aggregation inhibitors. Women had a higher prevalence of illnesses and anticholinergic drug prescriptions than men. The results of this study highlighted an upward trend in polypharmacy and excessive polypharmacy among older patients in primary care settings. Future research should focus on optimizing medication management and deprescribing strategies and minimizing the adverse effects of polypharmacy in this population.

Association between Cognitive Impairment Severity and Polypharmacy in Older Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Retrospective Study Using Inpatient Data from a Specialised Geriatric Hospital.

This study aimed to investigate the association between cognitive impairment and polypharmacy in patients with atrial fibrillation prone to cognitive decline, and to elucidate if the Dementia Assessment Sheet for Community-based Integrated Care System 21-Items (DASC-21) severity classification indicates drug adjustment. This retrospective cohort study used the DASC-21 and Diagnosis Procedure Combination data at a specialised geriatric hospital with patients hospitalised between April 2019 and March 2022. The association between cognitive severity evaluated using the DASC-21 and polypharmacy was investigated using a multivariate logistic regression model. Data of 1191 inpatients (44.3% aged ≥85 years, 49.0% male) were analysed. Compared with severe cognitive impairment, mild (odds ratio [OR]: 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.29-8.57) and moderate (OR: 2.46, 95% CI: 1.06-5.72) impairments were associated with concurrent use of ≥6 medications. Antithrombotics were related to polypharmacy. The ORs did not change with 6, 8, or 10 medications (2.11 [95% CI: 1.51-2.95, p < 0.001], 2.42 [95% CI: 1.79-3.27, p < 0.001], and 2.01 [95% CI: 1.46-2.77, p < 0.001], respectively). DASC-21 severity was associated with polypharmacy in patients with atrial fibrillation, with a trend toward decreased polypharmacy from moderate to severe. The DASC-21 may serve as an indicator for drug adjustment in clinical practice.

Polypharmacy in older patients presenting to a tertiary regional health service: identifying correlations between demographics, presentations and length of stay.

This study aimed to describe hospital admissions in patients experiencing polypharmacy and evaluate the effects of demographic factors on length of stay (LOS) and polypharmacy. We found that increasing age is associated with increasing polypharmacy rates but decreasing LOS. Females were more likely to experience higher rates of polypharmacy, but males were more likely to have longer LOS. First Nations peoples had higher rates of polypharmacy and longer LOS. Future projects investigating deprescribing methods are critical.

Impact of polypharmacy in older patients with type 2 diabetes in rural population in South India

Background: The World Health Organization describes polypharmacy as a safe and efficient treatment that complies with evidence-based medicine and uses at least five different medications. Aims and Objectives: The aim of our study was to investigate the impact of polypharmacy in older patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in rural population in South India. Materials and Methods: The study comprised a total of 100 patients, who were referred to the Government General Hospital, Nizamabad, between January 2020 and March 2022. The records of 50 randomly chosen non-diabetic patients who visited our hospital for other ailments were compared to those of the 50 T2DM patients. Results: In this study, a total of 100 patients were enrolled, out of which 62 were male (62%) and 38 were female (38%). The duration of diabetes was noted to be 0–5 years in 28 patients, 6–10 years in52 patients and &gt;10 years in 20 patients. In our study, we observed that more than five drugs were prescribed to 45 patients in the case group and only ten patients in the control group. Conclusion: Our study shows that older adults with diabetes have a high prevalence of polypharmacy and that this condition may have a significant impact on a number of health-related outcomes. Each patient should receive a customized course of treatment with the right number of medications for their particular ailment. The danger of side effects increases with the number of medications.

Real-World Impact of a Pharmacogenomics-Enriched Comprehensive Medication Management Program.

The availability of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) and other methods for personalizing medicine now allows evaluation of their real-world impact on healthcare delivery. For example, addressing issues associated with polypharmacy in older patients using pharmacogenomics (PGx) and comprehensive medication management (CMM) is thought to hold great promise for meaningful improvements across the goals of the Quadruple Aim. However, few studies testing these tools at scale, using relevant system-wide metrics, and under real-world conditions, have been published to date. Here, we document a reduction of ~$7000 per patient in direct medical charges (a total of $37 million over 5288 enrollees compared to 22,357 non-enrolled) in Medicare Advantage patients (≥65 years) receiving benefits through a state retirement system over the first 32 months of a voluntary PGx-enriched CMM program. We also observe a positive shift in healthcare resource utilization (HRU) away from acute care services and toward more sustainable and cost-effective primary care options. Together with improvements in medication risk assessment, patient/provider communication via pharmacist-mediated medication action plans (MAP), and the sustained positive trends in HRU, we suggest these results validate the use of a CDSS to unify PGx and CMM to optimize care for this and similar patient populations.

Prescription Rates, Polypharmacy and Prescriber Variability in Swiss General Practice-A Cross-Sectional Database Study.

Purpose: The frequency of medication prescribing and polypharmacy has increased in recent years in different settings, including Swiss general practice. We aimed to describe patient age- and sex-specific rates of polypharmacy and of prescriptions of the most frequent medication classes, and to explore practitioner variability in prescribing. Methods: Retrospective cross-sectional study based on anonymized electronic medical records data of 111 811 adult patients presenting to 116 Swiss general practitioners in 2019. We used mixed-effects regression analyses to assess the association of patient age and sex with polypharmacy (≥5 medications) and with the prescription of specific medication classes (second level of the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System). Practitioner variability was quantified in terms of the random effects distributions. Results: The prevalence of polypharmacy increased with age from 6.4% among patients aged 18–40 years to 19.7% (41–64 years), 45.3% (65–80 years), and 64.6% (81–92 years), and was higher in women than in men, particularly at younger ages. The most frequently prescribed medication classes were antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products (21.6% of patients), agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (19.9%), analgesics (18.7%), and drugs for acid related disorders (18.3%). Men were more often prescribed agents targeting the cardiovascular system, whereas most other medications were more often prescribed to women. The highest practitioner variabilities were observed for vitamins, for antiinflammatory and antirheumatic products, and for mineral supplements. Conclusion: Based on practitioner variability, prevalence, and risk potential, antiinflammatory drugs and polypharmacy in older patients appear to be the most pressing issues in current drug prescribing routines.

Control in the Hospital by Extensive Clinical rules for Unplanned hospitalizations in older Patients (CHECkUP); study design of a multicentre randomized study

BackgroundDue to ageing of the population the incidence of multimorbidity and polypharmacy is rising. Polypharmacy is a risk factor for medication-related (re)admission and therefore places a significant burden on the healthcare system. The reported incidence of medication-related (re)admissions varies widely due to the lack of a clear definition. Some medications are known to increase the risk for medication-related admission and are therefore published in the triggerlist of the Dutch guideline for Polypharmacy in older patients. Different interventions to support medication optimization have been studied to reduce medication-related (re)admissions. However, the optimal template of medication optimization is still unknown, which contributes to the large heterogeneity of their effect on hospital readmissions. Therefore, we implemented a clinical decision support system (CDSS) to optimize medication lists and investigate whether continuous use of a CDSS reduces the number of hospital readmissions in older patients, who previously have had an unplanned probably medication-related hospitalization.MethodsThe CHECkUP study is a multicentre randomized study in older (≥60 years) patients with an unplanned hospitalization, polypharmacy (≥5 medications) and using at least two medications from the triggerlist, from Zuyderland Medical Centre and Maastricht University Medical Centre+ in the Netherlands. Patients will be randomized. The intervention consists of continuous (weekly) use of a CDSS, which generates a Medication Optimization Profile, which will be sent to the patient’s general practitioner and pharmacist. The control group will receive standard care. The primary outcome is hospital readmission within 1 year after study inclusion. Secondary outcomes are one-year mortality, number of emergency department visits, nursing home admissions, time to hospital readmissions and we will evaluate the quality of life and socio-economic status.DiscussionThis study is expected to add evidence on the knowledge of medication optimization and whether use of a continuous CDSS ameliorates the risk of adverse outcomes in older patients, already at an increased risk of medication-related (re)admission. To our knowledge, this is the first large study, providing one-year follow-up data and reporting not only on quality of care indicators, but also on quality-of-life.Trial registrationThe trial was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register on October 14, 2018, identifier: NL7449 (NTR7691). https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/7449.

Our multidisciplinary approach helped tackle polypharmacy in older patients

Our multidisciplinary approach helped tackle polypharmacy in older patients

Expert-based medication reviews to reduce polypharmacy in older patients in primary care: a northern-Italian cluster-randomised controlled trial

BackgroundEvidence regarding clinically relevant effects of interventions aiming at reducing polypharmacy is weak, especially for the primary care setting. This study was initiated with the objective to achieve clinical benefits for older patients (aged 75+) by means of evidence-based reduction of polypharmacy (defined as ≥8 prescribed drugs) and inappropriate prescribing in general practice.MethodsThe cluster-randomised controlled trial involved general practitioners and patients in a northern-Italian region. The intervention consisted of a review of patient’s medication regimens by three experts who gave specific recommendations for drug discontinuation.Main outcome measures were non-elective hospital admissions or death within 24 months (composite primary endpoint). Secondary outcomes were drug numbers, hospital admissions, mortality, falls, fractures, quality of life, affective status, cognitive function.ResultsTwenty-two GPs/307 patients participated in the intervention group, 21 GPs/272 patients in the control group. One hundred twenty-five patients (40.7%) experienced the primary outcome in the intervention group, 87 patients (32.0%) in the control group. The adjusted rates of occurrence of the primary outcome did not differ significantly between the study groups (intention-to-treat analysis: adjusted odds ratio 1.46, 95%CI 0.99–2.18, p = 0.06; per-protocol analysis: adjusted OR 1.33, 95%CI 0.87–2.04, p = 0.2).Hospitalisations as single endpoint occurred more frequently in the intervention group according to the unadjusted analysis (OR 1.61, 95%CI 1.03–2.51, p = 0.04) but not in the adjusted analysis (OR 1.39, 95%CI 0.95–2.03, p = 0.09). Falls occurred less frequently in the intervention group (adjusted OR 0.55, 95%CI 0.31–0.98; p = 0.04). No significant differences were found regarding the other outcomes.Definitive discontinuation was obtained for 67 (16.0%) of 419 drugs rated as inappropriate.About 6% of the prescribed drugs were PIMs.ConclusionsNo conclusive effects were found regarding mortality and non-elective hospitalisations as composite respectively single endpoints. Falls were significantly reduced in the intervention group, although definitive discontinuation was achieved for only one out of six inappropriate drugs. These results indicate that (1) even a modest reduction of inappropriate medications may entail positive clinical effects, and that (2) focusing on evidence-based new drug prescriptions and prevention of polypharmacy may be more effective than deprescribing.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials (ID ISRCTN: 38449870), date: 11/09/2013.

Mediterranean diet, walking outdoors and polypharmacy in older patients with type II diabetes.

Polypharmacy and its adverse health effects is an emerging public health issue, with increasing prevalence among patients with multiple chronic conditions, such as older adults with diabetes. A healthy lifestyle has been shown to improve both diabetes and polypharmacy incidence. We conducted a cross-sectional study to investigate the association of a healthy lifestyle with polypharmacy and comorbidities in older people with diabetes. All out-patients from January 2013 to June 2015 with type II diabetes aged 65 years or more from a Lazio Region reference centre for diabetes were included in the study. Socio-demographic, clinical and lifestyle data were collected from medical records and through face-to-face standardized questionnaires. The comorbidity-polypharmacy score (CPS) was used to characterize the overall patients' frailty, by assessing concurrently the presence of comorbidities and polypharmacy. The cumulative logit model was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Adjusted ORs for age, sex, body mass index, physical activity and cognitive status, showed that CPS score was inversely related to weekly consumption of cruciferous vegetables (OR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.35-0.90; P-trend = 0.015), leafy green vegetables (OR: 0.54, 95% CI: 0.33-0.87; P-trend = 0.013) and daily intake of fruits (OR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.41-0.97; P-trend = 0.036). Walking outdoors was found inversely related to CPS score (age- and sex-adjusted OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.42-0.86). Our findings suggest that eating some dietary factors present in the Mediterranean diet and walking outdoors regularly is associated with a lower intensity of medicines need to treat comorbidities among older people with diabetes.

Epidemiology and associated factors of polypharmacy in older patients in primary care: a northern Italian cross-sectional study

BackgroundA precondition for developing strategies to reduce polypharmacy and its well-known harmful consequences is to study its epidemiology and associated factors. The objective of this study was to analyse the prevalence of polypharmacy (defined as ≥8 prescribed drugs), of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and major drug-drug interactions (DDIs) among community-dwelling general practice patients aged ≥75 years and to identify characteristics being associated with polypharmacy.MethodsThis cross-sectional study is derived from baseline data (patients’ demographic/biometric characteristics, diagnoses, medication-related data, cognitive/affective status, quality of life) of a northern-Italian cluster-RCT. PIMs and DDIs were assessed using the 2012 Beers criteria and the Lexi-Interact® database. Data were analysed using descriptive methods, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Fisher’s exact tests and Spearman correlations.ResultsOf the eligible patients aged 75+, 13.4% were on therapy with ≥8 drugs. Forty-three general practitioners and 579 patients participated in the study. Forty five point nine percent of patients were treated with ≥1 Beers-listed drugs. The most frequent PIMs were benzodiazepines/hypnotics (19.7% of patients) and NSAIDs (6.6%). Sixty seven point five percent of patients were exposed to ≥1 major DDI, 35.2% to ≥2 major DDIs. Antithrombotic/anticoagulant medications (30.4%) and antidepressants/antipsychotics (23.1%) were the most frequently interacting drugs. Polypharmacy was significantly associated with a higher number of major DDIs (Spearman’s rho 0.33, p < 0.001) and chronic conditions (Spearman’s rho 0.20, p < 0.001), higher 5-GDS scores (thus, lower affective status) (Spearman’s rho 0.12, p = 0.003) and lower EQ-5D-5L scores (thus, lower quality of life) (Spearman’s rho − 0.14, p = 0.001). Patients’ age/sex, 6-CIT scores (cognitive status), BMI or PIM use were not correlated with the number of drugs.ConclusionsThe prevalence of polypharmacy, PIMs and major DDIs was considerable. Results indicate that physicians should particularly observe their patients with multiple conditions, reduced health and affective status, independently from other patients’ characteristics. Careful attention about indication, benefit and potential risk should be paid especially to patients on therapy with specific drug classes identified as potentially inappropriate or prone to major DDIs in older persons (e.g., benzodiazepines, NSAIDs, protonic pump inhibitors, antithrombotics/anticoagulants, antidepressants/antipsychotics).Trial registrationThe cluster-RCT on which this cross-sectional analysis is based was registered with Current Controlled Trials Ltd. (ID ISRCTN: 38449870) on 2013-09-11.

Health professionals' perspectives regarding polypharmacy in older patients with cancer: A mixed-design exploratory study

ObjectivesOlder patients with cancer often present with multimorbidity and polypharmacy, but there is little information on the challenges these conditions raise. We aimed to describe health professionals' practice, perceptions and needs related to polypharmacy for older adults receiving cancer treatment. Materials and MethodsWe performed a mixed-design exploratory study. Phase 1 involved an online survey of 16 Likert-scale or multiple choices questions regarding polypharmacy and medication management for older patients with cancer. Phase 2 comprised two focus groups with oncology health professionals to learn about their perceptions and needs regarding medication management during cancer treatments. ResultsA total of 54 health professionals responded to the survey (nurses = 25; pharmacists = 21; physicians = 6; other = 2). Half of them always or often felt that medication is a significant burden for patients but only a quarter always or often addressed the possibility of stopping medications. Ten health professionals participated in the focus groups. The normalization of the quantity of medications used in relation with aging, as well as the lack of older adults' knowledge about their medication were reported. Other barriers to deprescribing included lack of time and expertise, and issues with communication between health professionals. ConclusionAlthough polypharmacy is a concern for many health professionals, most do not discuss deprescribing with older patients with cancer. Normalization of medication use, both by older adults and health professionals, stands as a significant barrier to critical medication review. The development of clinical tools could facilitate identification of circumstances where deprescribing is appropriate and help reduce associated barriers.

Association between number of medications and mortality in geriatric inpatients: a Danish nationwide register-based cohort study.

To explore the association between the number of medications and mortality in geriatric inpatients taking activities of daily living and comorbidities into account. A nationwide population-based cohort study was performed including all patients aged ≥ 65years admitted to geriatric departments in Denmark during 2005-2014. The outcome of interest was mortality. Activities of daily living using Barthel Index (BI) were measured at admission. National health registers were used to link data on an individual level extracting data on medications, and hospital diseases. Patients were followed to the end of study (31/12/2015), death, or emigration, which ever occurred first. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate crude survival proportions. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using Cox regression. The multivariable analysis were adjusted for age, marital status, period of hospital admission, BMI, and BI (model 1), and additionally either number of diseases (model 2) or Charlson comorbidity index (model 3). We included 74,603 patients (62.8% women), with a median age of 83 (interquartile range [IQR] 77-88) years. Patients used a median of 6 (IQR 4-9) medications. Increasing number of medications was associated with increased overall, 30-day, and 1-year mortality in all three multivariable models for both men and women. For each extra medication, the mortality increased by 3% in women and 4% in men in the fully adjusted model. Increasing number of medications was associated with mortality in this nationwide cohort of geriatric inpatients. Our findings highlight the importance of polypharmacy in older patients with comorbidities.

Medication Reconciliation Associated with Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in Older Patients with Cancer: ChimioAge Study.

BackgroundPolymorbidity induces polypharmacy in older patients may lead to potential drug–drug interactions (DDI) which can modify the tolerance and safety of oncological treatments and alter the intended therapeutic effect. The objective of our study was to describe the decision-making process for oncological treatment and related outcomes, in a population of older adults undergoing a comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) associated to a comprehensive medication reconciliation (CMR) prior to initiating oncological treatment.MethodsChimioAge is a prospective observational study conducted between 01/2017 and 07/2018 at Marseille University Hospital and approved by the French National Ethics Committee. It comprised all consecutive patients aged 70 years and over who were referred for a CGA as part of CMR, before initiating systemic treatment.ResultsOne hundred and seventy-one cancer patients were included. Mean age was 79.2 years, over half had metastatic cancers, 75% had an ECOG performance status zero or one, and two-thirds were independent in daily activities. Two-thirds of the patients had polypharmacy and the CMR identified potential DDI with systemic treatment in 43.3% of patients. Following the CGA, the CMR and the hospital oncologists decision, 30% of the patients received adapted systemic treatment with reduced doses at initiation. They presented fewer toxicities – irrespective of grade and type – than patients who received standard treatment (p<0.001) and had comparable overall survival (Log rank p=0.21).ConclusionThis is one of the first studies to highlight the value in conducting CMR and a CGA simultaneously before initiating systemic treatment in older patients with cancer. These two evaluations could give oncologists decisive information to personalize cancer treatment of older patients and optimize treatment dose to offer the best efficacy and minimize toxicity.

Chemotherapy toxicities and geriatric syndromes in older patients with malignant gliomas

ObjectiveTo describe treatment toxicities and polypharmacy in older patients with malignant gliomas (MG). BackgroundAdvanced age in cancer patients is associated with increased treatment-related toxicities, acute care utilization and functional decline. Most patients with MG are over age 65, yet treatment patterns and toxicities are poorly defined. MethodsA retrospective chart review of 125 patients with MG age 65 or older at the University of Rochester from January 2012 to December 2018. Results115 patients with glioblastoma and 10 with anaplastic astrocytoma had a median age of 71 (range 65–89) at diagnosis and median overall survival (OS) of 10.3 months. Radiotherapy (RT) was offered and completed in 79% (fractionated, n = 69, hypofractionated, n = 30). 24% of the 98 patients treated with concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) experienced treatment delays (n = 24). Median of 4 cycles of adjuvant TMZ were taken by 61% (n = 76). Delays and dose reductions occurred in 55% during treatment with adjuvant TMZ, most commonly due to thrombocytopenia (n = 29) and fatigue (n = 15). 16/98 patients required transfusions during treatment with concurrent or adjuvant TMZ. At baseline, patients were prescribed a median of 11 medications. OS was longer in patients prescribed less than 8 medications vs. 8 or more (14 vs. 8.6 months, p = .0738). 96% experienced a non-elective hospital admission and 64% reported at least one fall. ConclusionOlder patients with MG experience significant polypharmacy, treatment toxicities and falls. Studies incorporating geriatric assessment tools may better determine associations between geriatric syndromes and survival. Clinical trials in older patients should also include non-survival outcomes.

Serotonin syndrome due to duloxetine and tramadol use in an older patient

This case report describes a 92-year old woman presenting with acute confusion and agitation. She was initially diagnosed as having a hyperactive delirium. However, based on the presence of additional and evolving features of twitchiness, reduced coordination, palpitations and headaches, the diagnosis was re-evaluated. The clinical presentation was subsequently recognised as being that of the serotonin syndrome. In this instance, the serotonin syndrome was judged to have arisen from the concurrent use of duloxetine and tramadol. Duloxetine is an antidepressant with serotonergic properties. Tramadol is an analgesic agent with weak opiate agonist receptor effects, and also exerts reuptake inhibition of noradrenaline and serotonin. The patient’s polypharmacy was reviewed, and alongside other general supportive care measures, her symptoms and signs resolved within 48 hours. This report serves as a clinical reminder on the potential pitfalls of polypharmacy in older patients. Delirium is a common presentation in older patients, and on occasions, clearly establishing the underlying causes or risk factors may prove challenging or even elusive. The report prompts clinicians to bear in mind that the presentation and diagnosis of the serotonin syndrome requires a high index of suspicion, and that patients may present atypically. In support of pharmacovigilance reporting, two scales of causality assessment are employed in this case review. The application of these systems exemplifies their potential in promoting and enhancing objectivity when clinicians report suspected adverse drug reactions (ADRs) noted in routine clinical practice.

No Difference in Pain After Spine Surgery with Local Wound Filtration of Morphine and Ketorolac: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Controlling postoperative pain after spinal surgery is important for rehabilitation and patient satisfaction. Wound infiltration with local anesthetics may improve postoperative pain, but true multimodal approaches for achieving analgesia after spinal surgery remain unknown. In this randomized, controlled, double-blind trial after lumbar interbody fusion, we asked: (1) Does multimodal analgesia reduce VAS pain scores by a clinically important amount? (2) Does this analgesic approach reduce the amount of morphine patients consume after surgery? (3) Is this approach associated with fewer opioid-related side effects after surgery? This study included 80 adult patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion who were randomized into two groups: A control group (n = 40) who received infiltration of the surgical incision at the end of the procedure with an injection of 0.5% bupivacaine 100 mg (20 mL) and epinephrine 0.5 mg (0.5 mL), and the multimodal group (n = 40), who received wound infiltration with the same approach but with different medications: 0.5% bupivacaine 92.5 mg (18.5 mL), ketorolac 30 mg (1 mL), morphine 5 mg (0.5 mL), and epinephrine 0.5 mg (0.5 mL). There were no between-group differences in the proportion of patients who were male, nor in the mean age, height, weight, preoperative pain score, or surgical time. All treatments were administered by one surgeon. All patients, the surgeon, and the researchers were blinded to the allocation of patients to each group. Pain at rest was recorded using the VAS. Postoperative morphine consumption (administered using a patient-controlled analgesia pump) and opiod-associated side effects including nausea/vomiting, pruritus, urinary retention, and respiratory depression were assessed; this study was analyzed according to intention-to-treat principles. No loss to follow-up or protocol deviations were noted. We considered a 2-cm change on a 10-cm scale on the VAS as the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Differences smaller than this were considered unlikely to be important. At no point were there between-group differences in the VAS scores that exceeded the MCID, indicating no clinically important reductions in pain associated with administering multimodal injections. The highest treatment effect was observed at 3 hours that showed only a -1.3 cm mean difference between the multimodal and the control groups (3.2 ± 1.8 versus 4.5 ± 1.9 [95% CI -1.3 to -0.3]; p < 0.001), which was below the MCID. Morphine consumption was very slightly higher in the control group than in the multimodal group (2.8 ± 2.8 versus 0.3 ± 1.0, mean difference 2.47; p < 0.001). The percentage of patients reporting opioid-related side effects was lower in the multimodal group than in the control group. The proportions of nausea and vomiting were higher in the control group (30% [12 of 40] than in the multimodal group (3% [1 of 40]; p = 0.001). All of these side effects were transient and none was severe. Multimodal wound infiltration with an NSAID and morphine did not yield any clinically important reduction in pain or opioid consumption. Since no substantial benefit of adding these drugs to a patient's aftercare regimen was achieved, and considering the potential risks of administering opioids and NSAIDs (such as, polypharmacy in older patients, serious adverse effects of NSAIDs), we recommend against routine use of this approach in clinical practice. Level I, therapeutic study.

Frailty and Polypharmacy in Older Patients: Critical Issues for Otolaryngologists

Frailty and polypharmacy are conditions commonly encountered in older otolaryngology patients and impact their symptoms as well as treatment decision-making. A number of frailty assessment tools are available and in active use. Retrospective studies of large cohorts of patients identify a close correlation between measures of frailty and outcomes. Prospective assessment to inform decision-making remains challenging in clinical practice. The definition of “too many” medications, often termed polypharmacy, remains controversial. Management can be considered a form of “personalized medicine,” as each patient has different goals and tolerance for unintended medication effect. The impact of medications on balance function is well recognized, however, reports on the role of medications on upper aerodigestive tract symptoms have been less salient or non-existent. It is the author’s opinion this impact represents an opportunity for more extensive study. Otolaryngologists who manage older adults need to be cognizant of the current knowledge regarding frailty and polypharmacy as these conditions often dramatically impact decision-making in the management of patients with otolaryngologic disorders. Additional studies are needed to address the role of medications on upper aerodigestive tract physiology.