Reviewed by: Appalachian Reckoning: A Region Responds to Hillbilly Elegy by Anthony Harkins and Meredith McCarroll Karida L. Brown (bio) Appalachian Reckoning: A Region Responds to Hillbilly Elegy. By Anthony Harkins and Meredith McCarroll. (Morgantown, West Virginia University Press, 2019. Pp 432. $99.99 cloth; $28.99 paper; $28.99 ebook) “The function, the very serious function of racism is a distraction. It keeps you from doing your work. It keeps you explaining, over and over again, your reason for being. Somebody says you have no language and you spend twenty years proving that you do. Somebody says your head isn’t shaped properly so you have scientists working on the fact that it is. Somebody says you have no art, so you dredge that up. Somebody says you have no kingdoms, so you dredge that up. None of this is necessary. There will always be one more thing.” –Toni Morrison, “A Humanist View,” (1975) Our late American Pulitzer and Nobel Prize winning author and social critic Toni Morrison summed up the crux of the issue in the quote above. In shorthand, “racism is a distraction.” So too, are the longstanding tropes that have for nearly two centuries had a stronghold [End Page 203] on Appalachia—who it is and who it can be, what it is, and why. The arbiter of these readily available insidious scripts usually comes in the form of some out-of-town representative who gets passed the bullhorn by the publishing industry to “re-discover” the region anew and to translate its elusive meaning to a mainstream outside audience. This time around, he came as a hybrid. A second-generation child of eastern Kentucky migrants, a young man who grew up in a working-class town in Ohio but was raised up off-and-on by his grandma in the hollers of Jackson, Kentucky; a person who was in it, but not of it. His name, this time around, is James David Vance. He has come to us as the twenty-first century reincarnate Pied Piper of Appalachian Distraction. In most cases, the most powerful response to such tropism is silence. Not because those in room who are being caricaturized, whether for profit or for political gain, have nothing to say about these trite proclamations, but instead because we are too busy doing our work to put our precious words, art, and poetry in service of a distraction. There are, however, always exceptions. Once every blue moon some production emerges within the mainstream media that is so penetratingly egregious that it requires nothing less than a chorused response. Anthony Harkins and Meredith McCarroll’s edited volume Appalachian Reckoning: A Region Responds to Hillbilly Elegy does just that. The book is organized in two sections: part one, “Considering Hillbilly Elegy,” comprised of contributions responding to J. D. Vance’s book, and part two, “Beyond Hillbilly Elegy,” which consists of a collection of original essays, poems, and images by Appalachian writers and artists. Together these contributions serve as a powerful multi-vocal response from forty-four of our most lauded Appalachian creatives to the monolithic tropology that is Hillbilly Elegy. Read together, the pieces in the first part of Appalachia Reckoning push the reader to critically examine the institutional that ensures Appalachia will remain the poor white inherently debased “Other” in the popular imagination. What is Appalachia? Really, what is it as a place, a [End Page 204] metaphor, and a political artifact? Who are the actors who contribute to the production of knowledge about a place? How does power circulate through this industry to render some, like Vance, an authority, and others as of little consequence to the conversation? The inner-workings of these sleights-of-hand have been exposed time and time again, however, when a Pied Piper comes back into the midst, the work of the Appalachian creative is to clap-back. That is our responsibility. Please allow me to whet your appetite by briefly highlighting some of the volume’s pieces. In the opening essay “Hillbilly Elitism”, historian T. R. C. Hutton deals with the question of who Hillbilly Elegy was written for. Surely not with the people that it represents, but for...