Polished Taper Research Articles

REOPERATION-FREE SURVIVAL OF COMMON FEMORAL STEM TYPES IN PRIMARY TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FROM A LARGE NATIONAL DATASET: TIME TO RETHINK GIRFT GUIDANCE? A NATIONAL COHORT STUDY USING AN INTEGRATED NATIONAL JOINT REGISTRY AND HES DATASET

Current advice regarding implant choice is based on estimates of cost-benefit derived from implant survival to an endpoint of revision. Current estimates do not account for many implant failures which are treated with non-revision surgery and may not be accurate. The aim of this study was to estimate survival of major stem implant design groups to an endpoint of reoperation.Primary total hip replacement and linked revision form the National Joint Registry (NJR) and Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data linked by unique identifier were used. Survival of femoral implant groups (cemented stainless steel polished taper [PTSS], cemented cobalt chrome polished taper [PTCC], cemented composite beam [CB], collarless cementless [NCOL] and collared cementless [COL]) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.809,832 patients with valid NJR and HES data from England, were included. Cumulative failure at ten years for PTSS increased overall from 2.9% (95%CI 2.8–2.9) to 3.6% (95%CI 3.6–3.7) after inclusion of reoperations. Cumulative failure at ten years for PTSS increased from 2.5% (95%CI 2.5–2.6) to 3.3% (95%CI 3.2–3.4), for PTCC increased from 3.8% (95%CI 3.5–4.0) to 5.4% (95%CI 5.1–5.6), for CB increased from 3.1% (95%CI 2.9–3.3) to 4.1% (95%CI 3.8–4.3), for NCOL increased from 3.4% (95%CI 3.3–3.5) to 3.9% (95%CI 3.8–4.0), and for COL increased from 2.5% (95%CI 2.4–2.6) to 3.1% (95%CI 2.9–3.2), after inclusion of reoperations.Re-operation for internal fixation is as significant life event for the patient as revision. When a more inclusive metric is used, the patient and clinician's perspective on what constitutes a GIRFT implant may not be the same. Further work is required to update implant selection guidance in view of the change in implant performance.

ESTIMATING THE RISK OF POSTOPERATIVE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMORAL FRACTURES AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY ASSOCIATED WITH COMMONLY USED IMPLANTS: AN ANALYSIS OF NATIONAL HEALTH DATA FROM ENGLAND

Current estimates of periprosthetic fracture risk associated with femoral implants is mostly limited to revision only estimates and does not accurately represent stem performance. The aim of this study was to estimate the risk of surgically treated post-operative periprosthetic femoral fracture (POPFF) more accurately associated with frequently used femoral implants used for total hip arthroplasty (THA).A cohort study of patients who underwent primary THA in England between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2020. Periprosthetic fractures were identified from prospectively collected revision records and national procedure coding records. Survival modelling was used to estimate POPFF incidence rates, adjusting for potential confounders. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients over 70 years, with non-osteoarthritic indications, and neck of femur fracture.POPFF occurred in 0.6% (5100/809,832) of cases during a median (IQR) follow up of 6.5 (3.9 to 9.6) years. The majority of POPFF were treated with fixation after implantation of a cemented stem. Adjusted patient time incidence rates (PTIR) for POPFF varied by stem design, regardless of cement fixation. Cemented composite beam stems (CB stems) demonstrated the lowest risk of POPFF. Collared cementless stems had an equivalent or lower rate of POPFF versus the current gold standard polished taper slip cemented stem.POPFF account for a quarter of all revisions following primary THA. Cemented CB stems are associated with the lowest POPFF risk. Stem design is strongly associated with POPFF risk, regardless of the presence of cement. Surgeons, policymakers, and patients should consider these findings when recommending femoral implants in those most at risk of POPFF.

DOES AN INTRAOPERATIVE FEMORAL FRACTURE IMPACT ONE-YEAR PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES WHEN USING A CEMENTLESS CORAIL STEM?

The significance of periprosthetic fractures about a total hip arthroplasty (THA) is becoming increasingly important. Recent studies have demonstrated post-operative periprosthetic fracture rates are higher amongst cemented polished taper slip (PTS) stem designs compared to collared cementless (CC) designs.However, in the National Joint Registry, the rate of intra-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (IOPFF) with cementless implant systems remains higher (0.87% vs 0.42%. p <0.001) potentially leading to more post-operative complications.This study identifies the incidence of IOPFF, the fracture subtype and compares functional outcomes and revision rates of CC femoral implants with an IOPFF to CC stems and PTS stems without a fracture.5376 consecutive CC stem THA, carried out through a posterior approach were reviewed for IOPFF. Each fracture was subdivided into calcar fracture, greater trochanter (GT) fracture or shaft fracture.1:1:1 matched analysis was carried out to compare Oxford scores at one year. Matching criteria included; sex (exact), age (± 1 year), American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade (exact), and date of surgery (± 6 months).Electronic records were used to review revision rates.Following review of the CC stems, 44 (0.8%) were identified as having an IOPFF. Of these 30 (0.6%) were calcar fractures, 11 (0.2%) GT fractures and 3 (0.06%) were shaft fractures. There were no shaft penetrations.Overall, no significant difference in Oxford scores at one year were observed when comparing the CC IOPFF, CC non-IOPFF and PTS groups.There were no CC stems revised for any reason with either a calcar fracture or trochanteric fracture within the period of 8 years follow-up.IOPFF do occur more frequently in cementless systems than cemented. The majority are calcar and GT fractures. These fractures, when identified and managed intra-operatively, do not have worse functional outcomes or revision rates compared to matched non-IOPFF cases.

SHORT AND TRANSVERSE VANCOUVER B1 FRACTURES AROUND A CEMENTED POLISHED TAPERED STEM: BEWARE!

Aim of this study was to identify reoperation rates in patients with short oblique and transverse fractures around a well fixed cemented polished taper slip stem and to determine any associations with treatment failure.Retrospective cohort study of 31 patients with AO transverse or short oblique Vancouver B1 PFFs around THA (total hip arthroplasty) cemented taper slip stems: 12 male (39%); mean age 74±11.9 (range 44–91); mean BMI 28.5±1.4 (range 16–48); and median ASA 3. Patient journeys were assessed, re-interventions reviewed. The primary outcome measure was reoperation.Time from primary THA to fracture was 11.3±7.8yrs (0.5–26yrs). Primary surgical management was fixation in 27/31 and rTHA (revision total hip arthroplasty) in 4/31. 10 of 31 (32%) patients required reoperation, 9 within 2 years of fracture: 1 following rTHA and 8 following ORIF. The commonest mode of failure was non-union (n=6). No significant associations with reoperation requirement were identified. Kaplan-Meier free from reoperation was 67.4% (49.8–85.0 95% CI) at 2 years and this was unaffected by initial management with ORIF or rTHA (Log rank 0.898). Of those reoperated, 6/10 required multiple reoperations to obtain either bony union or a stable revision construct and 13% ultimately required proximal femoral endoprostheses. The relative risk of 1 year mortality was 1.6 (0.25 to 10.1 95%CI) among patients who required reoperation compared to those who did not.These are difficult fractures to manage, should not be underestimated and patients should be counselled that there is a 30% risk of reoperation and 20% of requiring multiple reoperations.

Hip & Pelvis

The February 2024 Hip & Pelvis Roundup360 looks at: Trial of vancomycin and cefazolin as surgical prophylaxis in arthroplasty; Is preoperative posterior femoral neck tilt a risk factor for fixation failure? Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip; Periprosthetic fractures in larger hydroxyapatite-coated stems: are collared stems a better alternative for total hip arthroplasty?; Postoperative periprosthetic fracture following hip arthroplasty with a polished taper slip versus composite beam stem; Is oral tranexamic acid as good as intravenous?; Stem design and the risk of early periprosthetic femur fractures following THA in elderly patients; Does powered femoral broaching compromise patient safety in total hip arthroplasty?

A NOVEL 3D-PRINTED DUAL-MOBILITY IMPLANT: RESULTS UP TO SEVEN YEARS IN CLINICAL PRACTICE

Dual mobility (DM) is an established bearing option in Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). The traditional mono-block DM designs have limited ability for additional fixation, whereas the modular DM designs allow additional screw fixation but limit internal diameter and have the potential to generate metal debris. We report the early results of a CoCrMo alloy mono-block implant manufactured by additive technology with a highly porous ingrowth surface to enhance primary fixation and osseointegration.Prospective follow-up of the DuplexTM implant first inserted in March 2016 enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure was all-cause revision and secondary outcomes dislocation, peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF) and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Patients were risk stratified and all considered to be high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage using national database and via BC website.159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a cemented Polished taper stem (PTS) had a Type B PPF rate of 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to conventional THA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and >50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool.We believe our results demonstrate that risk stratification successfully aids implant selection to prevent dislocation in high-risk patients. This novel design has provided excellent early results in a challenging cohort where individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. NJR data on DM has reported an increase in revision for PPF. A “perfect storm” maybe created using DM in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection.

396 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing the Rate of Post Operative Periprosthetic Fracture Following Hip Arthroplasty with a Polished Taper Slip Versus Composite Beam Stem

Abstract Aim To compare the incidence of post-operative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) following hip replacement with either a cemented polished taper stem (PTS) or cemented composite beam stem (CB) in comparative studies. Method A systematic review of comparative studies, written in English, and published in peer-reviewed journals since year 2000 to 2021 was conducted using Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus. Methodology followed the Preferred Reporting items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Cohorts were classified as high or low risk of POPFF based on patient risk factors. Metanalysis was performed using a random effects model and relative incidence with 95% confidence intervals were reported. Results The overall study quality was good. 913,021 patients from 18 cohorts were included in the meta-analysis. 294,540 patients received a CB stem and 618,481 received a PTS stem. For patients at low risk of POPFF the incidence rate ratio (IRR) was 3.14 (CI: 2.48, 3.98) for the PTS group versus CB group. For patients at high risk of POPFF the IRR of 9.87 (CI: 3.63, 26.80) for the PTS group versus the CB group. Conclusions The risk of POPFF is lower when hip arthroplasty was performed using a composite beam stem versus a polished taper slip stem. This protective effect was greatest in patients with a higher risk of POPFF. Surgeons should consider the effect of cemented stem choice on risk of subsequent periprosthetic femur fracture, particularly in frail or elderly patients at risk of periprosthetic femoral fracture.

Subsidence in Centraliser Sign: A Novel Tool to Help Predict Early Subsidence in Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures Around Polished Tapered Stems Treated With Internal Fixation.

Background When treating periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPF) around polished taper slip stems (PTS), determining which patients can be successfully treated with internal fixation can be challenging. We have described the subsidence-in-centraliser (SINC) sign as a radiographic feature of PPF around PTS stems. We hypothesise that a positive SINC sign can help predict a poorer outcome for the fixation of these fractures. Patients and methods Retrospective identification of PPFs around cemented PTS with an appreciable centraliser on radiographs was conducted at a single centre. A positive SINC sign was defined as a post-injury radiograph demonstrating >50% reduction in the radiographic lucency representing the stem centraliser when compared to pre-injury films or complete obliteration of distal lucency when no pre-injury film was available. The primary outcome was the rate of subsequent stem subsidence on follow-up radiographs comparing SINC-positive and SINC-negative fractures, which were managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Results Fifty-four patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 76.8 years, and the mean follow-up for all patients was 12.7 months. Thirty-five fractures were deemed SINC-positive, and 19 were SINC-negative. 17/17 (100%) SINC-positive fractures managed with fixation underwent further subsidence (mean 5.4 mm, SD 2.8). A positive SINC sign demonstrated a sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 100% for subsequent stem subsidence in fractures treated without revision. SINC positive fractures underwent significantly more subsidence compared with SINC negative fractures when fixed (5.4 mm vs. 0.28 mm, U = 6.50, p<0.001) at a mean follow-up of 12.7 months. The SINC sign demonstrated strong inter- (k=0.96) and intra-rater (k=0.86) reliability. Conclusion The SINC sign can serve as a useful adjunct in the decision to fix or revise PPF around PTS. A positive SINC sign may represent a cement mantle that cannot be reconstituted anatomically, leading to subsidence after treatment with ORIF.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Studies Comparing the Rate of Post-operative Periprosthetic Fracture Following Hip Arthroplasty With a Polished Taper Slip versus Composite Beam Stem

BackgroundWe compared the incidence of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures (POPFF) following hip arthroplasty with either a cemented polished taper slip (PTS) stem or a cemented composite beam (CB) stem in comparative studies. MethodsA systematic review of comparative studies, written in English and published in peer-reviewed journals since the year 2000, was conducted. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.The overall study qualities were good. There were 913,021 patients from 18 cohorts included in the meta-analysis. There were 294,540 patients who received a CB stem and 618,481 received a PTS stem. Cohorts were classified as high- or low-risk for POPFF based on patient risk factors. A metanalysis was performed using a random effects model, and the relative incidence with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was reported. ResultsThe patients at low risk of POPFF had an incidence rate ratio of 3.14 (CI: 2.48, 3.98) for the PTS group versus the CB group. Whereas, the patients at high risk of POPFF had an incidence rate ratio of 9.87 (CI: 3.63, 26.80) for the PTS group versus the CB group. ConclusionsThe risk of POPFF is lower when hip arthroplasty was performed using a CB stem versus a PTS stem. This protective effect was greatest in patients who had a higher risk of POPFF. Surgeons should consider the effect of cemented stem choice on the risk of subsequent periprosthetic femur fracture, particularly in frail or elderly patients who are at a higher risk of postoperative periprosthetic femoral fracture.

DUAL MOBILITY IMPLANTS IN HIGH-RISK PATIENTS AND PERIPROSTHETIC FRACTURE: “A PERFECT STORM”

Dual mobility (DM) is most often used by surgeons to reduce instability in high risk patients. NJR data on DM has not demonstrated a reduction in all cause revision and has reported an increase in revision for peri-prosthetic fracture (PPF). The aim of our study was:Report outcome of DM used in high-risk patients including non-revision re-operations (dislocation &amp; PPF).Comparison with conventional bearing THA (cTHA) with local, national and NJR benchmarking data.Retrospective cohort assessment of falls risk for patients receiving DM.Prospective F/U of a DM implant since 2016 and enrolled into Beyond Compliance (BC). Primary outcome measure all-cause revision with secondary outcome including any re-operation and Oxford Hip Score (OHS). All patients were risk stratified and considered high risk for instability. Complications were identified via hospital records, clinical coding linkage, NJR and BC. Benchmarking data for comparison was obtained from same data sources we also considered all B type PPF that occurred with cemented polished taper stem (PTS).159 implants in 154 patients with a mean age 74.0 years and a maximum F/U of 6.7 years. Survivorship for all-cause revision 99.4% (95% CI 96.2–99.8). One femoral only revision. Mean gain in OHS 27.4. Dislocation rate 0.6% with a single event. Patients with a PTS rate of Type B PPF 2.1% requiring revision/fixation. Compared to cTHA this cohort was significantly older (74.0 vs 68.3 years), more co-morbidity (ASA 3 46.5% vs 14.4%) and more non-OA indications (32.4% vs 8.5%). Relative risks for dislocation 0.57 (95%CI 0.08–4.1) and PPF 1.75 (95%CI 0.54–5.72). Every patient had at least one risk factor for falling and &gt;50% of cohort had 4 or more risk factors using NICE tool.The selective use of DM in high-risk patients can reduce the burden of instability. These individuals are very different to the “average” THA patient. A “perfect storm” is created using a high-risk implant combination (DM &amp; PTS) in high-risk falls risk population. This re-enforces the need to consider all patient and implant factors when deciding bearing selection.

Which Unified Classification System type B periprosthetic fractures around cemented polished tapered stems should not be fixed?

The Unified Classification System (UCS), or Vancouver system, is a validated and widely used classification system to guide the management of periprosthetic femoral fractures. It suggests that well-fixed stems (type B1) can be treated with fixation but that loose stems (types B2 and B3) should be revised. Determining whether a stem is loose can be difficult and some authors have questioned how to apply this classification system to polished taper slip stems which are, by definition, loose within their cement mantle. Recent evidence has challenged the common perception that revision surgery is preferable to fixation surgery for UCS-B periprosthetic fractures around cemented polished taper slip stems. Indications for fixation include an anatomically reducible fracture and cement mantle, a well-fixed femoral bone-cement interface, and a well-functioning acetabular component. However, not all type B fractures can or should be managed with fixation due to the risk of early failure. This annotation details specific fracture patterns that should not be managed with fixation alone.

Factors associated with failure of fixation of Vancouver B fractures around a cemented polished tapered stem: A 5 to 14 year follow up study

AimsThere is increasing evidence for fixation as opposed to revision for Vancouver B fractures around polished taper slip stems, however it is remains unclear whether fixation is associated with stem loosening in the longer term. This study aims to assess survival of plate-fixation of Vancouver-B-fractures around a polished-taper- slip cemented stem and identify factors associated with failure. MethodsRetrospective cohort study assessed 129 consecutive unilateral Vancouver-B-fractures around cemented Exeter stems at a minimum of 5 years following open-reduction-internal-fixation (ORIF) with unilateral non-locked unilateral plating+/-cerclage cables. The primary outcome measure was reoperation for any reason. Kaplan Meier survival analysis was performed. ResultsFractures (B1 n = 31 (24%); B2 n = 91 (71%); and B3 n = 7 (5%)) occurred at median of 6 years (IQR 1.2–9.2) after primary surgery. Mean patient age was 78.2 (SD10.56, range 46–96) and 54 (42.9%) were female. Mean follow up was 8.7 years (SD 2.48, 5.7 to 14.4). Symptomatic femoral stem loosening requiring revision occurred in two B2 fractures of metaphyseal split and short spiral patterns. The most common mode of failure was non-union (n = 7, 5%). Both fixation failure (n = 6/31 Vs n = 3/91 vs n = 0/7, p = 0.008) and reoperation (n = 8/31 vs n = 6/91 vs n = 0/7, p = 0.008) were significantly higher following fixation of B1 fractures compared to B2 and B3 fractures. Overall 5year survival free from reoperation was 88.8% (82.0–94.7 95%CI). B1 fracture types were associated with an increase risk of failure (endpoints fixation failure p = 0.010; and reoperation p = 0.016). Transverse fractures (B1) were associated with a relative risk of reoperation of 4.22 (1.63–10.9 95% CI, p = 0.008). ConclusionFixation of Vancouver-B fractures around cemented Exeter stems, when the bone-cement interface is intact and the fracture is anatomically reducible, had an excellent 5-year survival. Only 2 (1.6%) cases of late femoral stem loosening occurred, however, B1 type transverse fractures were associated with a higher rate of reoperation.

Equivalent hip stem fixation by Hi-Fatigue G and Palacos R + G bone cement: a randomized radiostereometric controlled trial of 52 patients with 2 years’ follow-up

Background and purpose — Long-term fixation of cemented femoral stems relies on several factors including cement adhesion and fatigue. Hi-Fatigue is a newer third-generation bone cement with low-viscosity properties at room temperature, good mechanical strength, and stable bone–cement interface in a laboratory testing environment. Palacos bone cement has excellent 10-year survival and is considered gold standard. We compared stem subsidence after fixation with Hi-Fatigue and Palacos bone cements using radiostereometry.Patients and methods — In a patient-blinded randomized controlled trial, 52 patients (30 women) at mean age 76 years (71–87) with osteoarthrosis and no osteoporosis received Hi-Fatigue G or Palacos R + G cement fixation of collarless, polished, double-tapered stems (CPT). Tantalum beads were inserted in the periprosthetic bone. Supine stereoradiographs were obtained postoperatively, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and VAS pain were recorded preoperatively and 1 and 2 years after surgery. Cement working times and properties were registered.Results — At 2 years, mean stem subsidence of 1.12 mm (95% CI 0.96–1.29) for Hi-Fatigue and 1.19 mm (CI 1.03–1.34) for Palacos was similar. Likewise, stem version was comparable between cement groups. Mean OHS and VAS pain were similar between cement groups.Cement working times were similar between cement groups, but the mean curing time was longer for Hi-Fatigue (13.7 min) than for Palacos (11.6 min).Interpretation — We found similar and generally low migration of CPT femoral stems inserted with Hi-Fatigue and Palacos bone cement until 2 years’ follow-up, which indicates a good long-term survival of polished taper femoral stems inserted with both cement types.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01289834.

The World Hip Trauma Evaluation Study 3: Hemiarthroplasty Evaluation by Multicentre Investigation - WHITE 3: HEMI - An Abridged Protocol.

BackgroundApproximately half of all hip fractures are displaced intracapsular fractures. The standard treatment for these fractures is either hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty. The recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance on hip fracture management recommends the use of ‘proven’ cemented stem arthroplasty with an Orthopaedic Device Evaluation Panel (ODEP) rating of at least 3B (97% survival at three years). The Thompsons prosthesis is currently lacking an ODEP rating despite over 50 years of clinical use, likely due to the paucity of implant survival data. Nationally, adherence to these guidelines is varied as there is debate as to which prosthesis optimises patient outcomes.DesignThis study design is a multi-centre, multi-surgeon, parallel, two arm, standard-of-care pragmatic randomised controlled trial. It will be embedded within the WHiTE Comprehensive Cohort Study (ISRCTN63982700). The main analysis is a two-way equivalence comparison between Hemi-Thompson and Hemi-Exeter polished taper with Unitrax head. Secondary outcomes will include radiological leg length discrepancy measured as per Bidwai and Willett, mortality, re-operation rate and indication for re-operation, length of index hospital stay and revision at four months. This study will be supplemented by the NHFD (National Hip Fracture Database) dataset.DiscussionEvidence on the optimum choice of prosthesis for hemiarthroplasty of the hip is lacking. National guidance is currently based on expert opinion rather than empirical evidence. The incidence of hip fracture is likely to continue to increase and providing high quality evidence on the optimumCite this article: A. L. Sims. The World Hip Trauma Evaluation Study 3: Hemiarthroplasty Evaluation by Multicentre Investigation – WHITE 3: HEMI – An Abridged Protocol. Bone Joint Res 2016;5:18–25. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.51.2000473

Stem micromotion after femoral impaction grafting using irradiated allograft bone: A time zero in vitro study

BackgroundA gamma irradiation dose of 15kGy has been shown to adequately sterilise allograft bone, commonly used in femoral impaction bone grafting to treat bone loss at revision hip replacement, without significantly affecting its mechanical properties. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether use of 15kGy irradiated bone affects the initial mechanical stability of the femoral stem prosthesis, as determined by micromotion in a comprehensive testing apparatus, in a clinically relevant time zero in vitro model of revision hip replacement. MethodsMorselised ovine bone was nonirradiated (control), or irradiated at 15kGy or 60kGy. For each dose, six ovine femurs were implanted with a cemented polished taper stem following femoral impaction bone grafting. Using testing apparatus that reproduces stem loading, stems were cyclically loaded and triaxial micromotion of the stem relative to the bone was measured at the proximal and distal stem regions using non-contact laser transducers and linear variable differential transformers. FindingsThere were no significant differences in proximal or distal stem micromotion between groups for all directions (p≤0.80), apart for significantly greater distal stem medial–lateral micromotion in the 60kGy group compared to the 15kGy group (P=0.03), and near-significance in the anterior–posterior direction (P=0.08, power=0.85). InterpretationUsing a clinically relevant model and loading apparatus, irradiation of bone at 15kGy does not affect initial femoral stem stability following femoral impaction bone grafting.

Femoral Bone Is Preserved Using Cemented Polished Stems in Young Patients

Techniques that ensure femoral bone preservation after primary THA are important in younger patients who are likely to undergo revision surgery. We examined femoral stem survival, bone deficiency at revision arthroplasty, and radiographic bone loss in hips implanted with a cemented polished double-taper stem in a cohort of patients younger than 55 years. We reviewed 197 hips (median patient age, 47 years; range, 16-54 years) after a minimum followup of 2 years (median, 7 years; range, 2-19 years) since primary THA. Clinically, we determined survival to major and minor stem revision and cases of bone deficiency requiring a long stem or impaction bone grafting or created by the need for femoral osteotomy at revision arthroplasty. Radiographically, we assessed stem loosening, femoral osteolysis, and femoral bone deficiency. Stem survival to major revision for aseptic loosening was 100% at 13 years and for any reason was 97% (95% CI, 93-100%). At revision of seven stems, a long stem was used in one hip, a total femoral replacement in one hip and impaction bone grafting in one hip. No femoral osteotomies were required. Bone was preserved in four hips by cement-within-cement stem exchange. No stems were radiographically loose. Proximal osteolysis was present in 11% of femurs. Femoral bone deficiency was graded as Paprosky Type I (97%) or II (3%) and Endo-Klinik Grade 0 (79%) or I (21%). Cemented polished taper stems have high survival at 13 years in young patients and enable femoral bone preservation for subsequent revision. Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Fracture of an Exeter ‘Cement in Cement’ Revision Stem: A Case Report

The 'cement in cement' technique for revision hip arthroplasty has become popular in recent years, particularly in relation to polished taper stems. Since 2006 a short Exeter stem with 44 mm offset has been available specifically for this purpose. We report a fracture of such a stem in the absence of trauma 5 years after the revision procedure. The patient had a BMI of 27.8 and the proximal cement mantle gave good support to the stem. The fracture initiated and propagated from the introducer hole on the shoulder of the prosthesis. Macroscopically there was no defect in this area. This may be an unusual case of fatigue failure.

Bilateral Simultaneous Hip Replacement Versus Bilateral Sequential Hip Replacement A 7-Year Data Review

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of bilateral sequential versus bilateral simultaneous hip replacements, using the collarless polished taper cemented hip prosthesis, in relation to complications, revisions, patient satisfaction rates, and Harris Hip Score. Data were collected by independent practitioners and processed within the University Audit Department. A total of 594 patients were identified as having undergone bilateral hip replacement surgery. Patient satisfaction rates were consistently high in both groups. Harris Hip Scores improvements were similar and reflected a marked improvement in pain and function. The sequential bilateral group experienced an increased length of hospital stay and therefore potential cost implications, which may be offset by the lower incidence of adverse events. Bilateral simultaneous hip replacement remains an important option, for which there is strong supportive evidence.

THAにおけるpolished taper stemの改良がstress-shieldingの予防につながる

THAにおけるpolished taper stemの改良がstress-shieldingの予防につながる

Effect of rogue particles on the sub-surface damage of fused silica during grinding/polishing

The distribution and characteristics of surface cracks (i.e., sub-surface damage or scratching) on fused silica formed during grinding/polishing resulting from the addition of rogue particles in the base slurry has been investigated. Fused silica samples (10cm diameter×1cm thick) were: (1) ground by loose abrasive grinding (alumina particles 9–30μm) on a glass lap with the addition of larger alumina particles at various concentrations with mean sizes ranging from 15 to 30μm, or (2) polished (using 0.5μm cerium oxide slurry) on various laps (polyurethane pads or pitch) with the addition of larger rogue particles (diamond (4–45μm), pitch, dust, or dried Ceria slurry agglomerates) at various concentrations. For the resulting ground samples, the crack distributions of the as-prepared surfaces were determined using a polished taper technique. The crack depth was observed to: (1) increase at small concentrations (>10−4 fraction) of rogue particles; and (2) increase with rogue particle concentration to crack depths consistent with that observed when grinding with particles the size of the rogue particles alone. For the polished samples, which were subsequently etched in HF:NH4F to expose the surface damage, the resulting scratch properties (type, number density, width, and length) were characterized. The number density of scratches increased exponentially with the size of the rogue diamond at a fixed rogue diamond concentration suggesting that larger particles are more likely to lead to scratching. The length of the scratch was found to increase with rogue particle size, increase with lap viscosity, and decrease with applied load. At high diamond concentrations, the type of scratch transitioned from brittle to ductile and the length of the scratches dramatically increased and extended to the edge of the optic. The observed trends can be explained semi-quantitatively in terms of the time needed for a rogue particle to penetrate into a viscoelastic lap. The results of this study provide useful insights and ‘rules-of-thumb’ relating scratch characteristics observed on surfaces during optical glass fabrication to the characteristics of the rogue particles causing them and their possible source.