Police Custody In England Research Articles

Enhanced understanding of risk assessment in police custody in England and Wales using statistical modelling

The issue investigated in this paper is the risk assessment of detainees whilst they are booked into police custody in England and Wales. It is estimated that hundreds of thousands of people pass through police custody each year, with each detainee undergoing a risk assessment to establish risk of harm to themselves or to others. However, there has been little research to establish which risk factors identified through the current risk assessment process used within England and Wales have the most impact on risk management. Currently the analysis and evaluation of risk is subjective, based on the custody officer’s judgement and experience. Little is known through literature as to which factors are most influential in this risk assessment process. This paper highlights these gaps in the process and identifies the driving factors in decision making around detainee risk in an attempt to understand the risk management process better before detailing what further research can be conducted to close the gap in the process. Multivariate analysis was carried out on a data-set comprising of custody record data from three police forces, in particular information recorded as part of the risk assessment. Logistic regression, decision tree and discriminant analysis methods were used as all have the ability to classify and predict. Comprehensive analysis and augmentation of results has determined a set of variables which had an influencing impact on observation level. These results provide the background to the development of a supportive and robust risk assessment tool.

Variation in detainee risk assessment within police custody across England and Wales

ABSTRACTEvery time a person is booked into police custody in England and Wales, they are assessed for risk of harm to themselves or others. National guidance is provided on what questions should be asked as part of this process; however, each year there are still instances of serious adverse incidents, self-harm and deaths in custody. The purpose of this study is to look at the extent to which the national guidance is being followed and the extent to which the risk assessment process varies between police forces. A Freedom of Information request was sent to all 43 police forces in England and Wales asking for information on their risk assessment process. This data was then analysed alongside findings from police custody inspection visits conducted by Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary. This study provides evidence that the risk assessment process is not consistent across police forces in England and Wales. Not only does the process vary from the national guidance, the content and delivery differs considerably between police forces. The findings highlight a practical problem for police forces in ensuring that risk assessment processes are conducted to a consistent standard and reflect national guidance. The study is, to the authors’ knowledge, the first time that this data has been collated and compared.

Understanding Risks: Practitioner’s Perceptions of the Lottery of Mental Healthcare Available for Detainees in Custody

Abstract The range and growing number of healthcare requirements being presented within custody environments has been widely debated (Rekrut-Lapa, T. and Lapa, A. (2014). ‘Health Needs of Detainees in Police Custody in England and Wales: Literature Review’. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 69–75). Despite a number of reforms following the recommendations of the Bradley Review (Bradley (2009). Lord Bradley’s Review of People with Mental Health Problems or Learning Disabilities in the Criminal Justice System. Department of Health and Ministry of Justice) and the amendments made to the ACPO guidance on safe detention in 2012, research continues to highlight a lack of consistency to services available to effectively identify the needs of individuals in these arenas. This article is based on part of a wider research project conducted in the Metropolitan Police Service and portrays the voice of the police practitioners working in custody suites. The research found that various notions of risk are central within this setting and that current practices are not sufficient for ensuring the safety of both detainees and officers. The research concludes by offering a proposal for capturing good practice and learning in order to create a more reflective and learning environment in custody suites.

Police legitimacy in context: an exploration of “soft” power in police custody in England

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to examine how police authority – in its “soft” form – is used and understood by staff and detainees in police custody in England, examining how these meanings are shaped by this unique police setting. It is argued that the nature of this setting, as fraught and uncertain, along with the large volume of citizens who come into contact with the police therein, makes police custody the ultimate “teachable moment”.Design/methodology/approachThe present paper is based on in-depth qualitative data collected between March 2014 and May 2015 in four custody suites (in four forces). In each site, the researchers spent three to four weeks observing and then interviewed 10-15 staff (largely police officers, detention officers but also a few other criminal justice practitioners) and 10-15 detainees. In total, the paper is based on 532 hours of observing and 97 interviews (47 with staff and 50 with detainees).FindingsOne way that the staff used their authority in the custody suites in the research was softly and innocuously; this entailed for example staff communicating in a respectful manner with detainees, such as by being deliberately polite. The authors conclude that this “soft” power was a dynamic, processual matter, shaped in particular by the physical conditions of the suite, the uncertain and insecure nature of detainees’ circumstances, as well as by the sense of disempowerment they felt as a result of being deprived of their liberty and autonomy, all of which contributed to police custody being the ultimate “teachable moment”.Originality/valueThe paper draws on a range of qualitative data collected from both staff and detainees in four types of police custody suites as part the “good” police custody study. It therefore makes an original contribution to the field which has tended to rely on cross-sectional surveys of citizens not policed populations (Harkin, 2015; Worden and Mclean, 2017).

The role of emotion, space and place in police custody in England: Towards a geography of police custody

Police custody is a complex environment, where police officers, detainees and other staff interact in a number of different emotional, spatial and transformative ways. Utilising ethnographic and interview data collected as part of a five-year study which aims to rigorously examine ‘good’ police custody, this paper analyses the ways that liminality and temporality impact on emotion in police custody. Architecture has previously been noted as an important consideration in relation to social control, with literature linking the built environment with people’s emotional ‘readings’ of space. No work, however, has examined the links between temporality, liminality and emotional performativity in a police custody context. In this environment, power dynamics are linked to past experiences of the police, with emotions being intrinsically embodied, relational, liminal and temporal. Emotion management is therefore an important way of conceptualising the dynamic relationships in custody. The paper concludes by arguing that emotional aftershocks symbolise the liminal experience of detainees’ understanding of the police custody process once released, noting that it is important to understand the microscale, lived experience of police custody in order to develop broader understanding of broader social and policing policy in a police custody context.

Preliminary findings on police custody delivery in the twenty-first century: Is it ‘good’ enough?

ABSTRACTSince the 1980s, police custody in England and Wales has seen the civilianisation and privatisation of key roles formerly performed by police officers and changes to how police custody suites are managed and owned. These changes have been encapsulated in a five-pronged typology of custody suites identified by Skinns et al. Drawing on theories about ‘good’ policing as well as quantitative and qualitative data collected as part of an ongoing study of ‘good’ police custody, this paper provides some preliminary answers to two key questions: Can police custody ever be ‘good’ for suspects and, relatedly, are some types of custody suites likely to be better than others, in this regard? What are the implications for ‘good’ policing? We show that of the five types of custody suites identified in Skinns et al., the ‘unhurried hybrid’ may be particularly beneficial to ‘good’ experiences of police custody; for example, the conditions of custody are better and may facilitate a more trusting relationship between suspects and the police. The data also show that theories about ‘good’ policing are relevant and useful for conceptualising ‘good’ police custody; though of the five dimensions of ‘good’ policing some (e.g. policing as just) are more relevant than others (e.g. policing as crime reduction).

Demystifying Deaths in Police Custody: Challenging State Talk

This article seeks to understand the processes which occur after a death in police custody in England and Wales. The analytical focus falls upon the identities which are attributed to the victim by state actors. It will be argued that these identities are part of a discursive formation `state talk' which seeks to inflate the dangers faced by state actors in order to legitimate their often oppressive interventions in the lives of marginalized groups. A death in police custody poses serious questions about these interventions. Consequently, considerable ideological attention is required to ensure hegemonic support for coercive state apparatus. This article seeks to challenge the discourses of danger and disorder that state talk preaches in order to maintain authoritarian populism's hold over the historical bloc. Drawing upon a number of empirical sources, the article interrogates these narratives and presents a series of alternative truths about deaths in police custody.

Near miss incidents in police custody suites in London in 2003: A feasibility study

Introduction Potentially preventable deaths in police custody include those which involve illicit drugs, alcohol and deliberate self-harm. Near miss incidents (NMI) that did not result in death have a crucial role in understanding risk factors in custody. Such research has not previously been undertaken. A program of research has been developed to study NMI, in order to better identify those at risk in police custody. For the purposes of this research, NMI have been defined as ‘an unplanned and unforeseeable or unforeseen event that could have resulted, but did not result, in human death or may have resulted in injury or other adverse outcomes’. It was intended that the definition although broad, would not include simple accidents (e.g. slipping on urine in a cell) or trivial injury. Aims and methods The two aims of the study are (a) to determine whether it is realistic to attempt to assess NMI with the intention of identifying information of use in enhancing detainee care and (b) to assess how frequently NMIs occur and whether there are specific patterns. Pilot interviews were conducted with three forensic physicians practising in London, UK to create a structured questionnaire for all forensic physicians working in London. The questionnaire provided the basis of a retrospective recall survey of all forensic physicians working in London as Forensic Medical Examiners. The questionnaire was designed to assess the numbers of NMI, patterns in occurrence and relevant learning points within the previous 6 months. A covering letter, background questionnaire (exploring the background of the medical practitioner), copies of the survey, and reply paid envelopes were sent to each Forensic Medical Examiner ( n = 134) in London, contracted to provide forensic medical services for the Metropolitan Police Service. Data about all incidents were anonymised. Results Ninety six (73%) Forensic Medical Examiners responded. Of these 18% were Principal grade, the remainder were Senior (24%), Standard (35%) and Assistant (23%). Thirty eight NMI were reported by 27 Forensic Medical Examiners (of all levels). The initial reason for police contact was recorded as alcohol ( n = 8), theft and robbery ( n = 7), warrants ( n = 4), violence ( n = 3), traffic violations ( n = 2) and single cases of drugs, murder and immigration offences. Of the main perceived cause of each NMI, illicit drugs were involved in 12/38, alcohol in 17/38, deliberate self-harm in 11/38, issues concerning searches, checks or rousing in 8/38, failure of inter-agency communications in 5/38, and possible resource issues in 4/38. In a number of cases more than one factor was involved. Conclusions The information established about NMI is broadly consistent with documented patterns of deaths in police custody in England and Wales which supports the validity of the data. The next stage of this research will be a prospective six month study in which NMI will be analysed in order to learn lessons which may be utilised to attempt to prevent potentially avoidable deaths in police custody.

Deaths in police custody in England and Wales

Worldwide deaths in police custody are causing public disquiet. An account is given of all the deaths occurring in police custody in England and Wales over a ten-year period from 1970 – 1979 with details of the causes of death and inquest verdicts.