(ProQuest: ... denotes non-US-ASCII text omitted.)Between Brown and Red: Nationalism, Catholicism, and Communism in Twentieth-Century Poland: The Politics of Boleslaw Piasecki . By Mikolaj Stanislaw Kunicki . Ohio University Press Polish and Polish-American Studies Series. Athens : Ohio University Press , 2012. xxix + 266 pp. $39.96 cloth; $28.95 paper.Book Reviews and NotesPolitical biography has fallen out of fashion, so Mikolaj Stanislaw Kunicki's fascinating biography of Boleslaw Piasecki is a welcome reminder of how genre can provide insight into larger political issues. Between Brown and Red is also a reminder of pitfalls of biography, which inevitably struggles to balance role of individual with whirlwind of complex social, cultural, and political forces. While Kunicki is not always successful in striking this balance, merits of this book far outweigh its shortcomings.Kunicki recounts career of Polish right-wing nationalist, sometime fascist, sometime communist, and always Catholic Boleslaw Piasecki. He was a remarkable--and despicable--political opportunist whose public career began in far right student movements of 1930s and ended with his elevation to Poland's Council of State in 1970s. As Kunicki convincingly asserts, Piasecki's story reveals the persistence of right and of pluralistic rather than totalitarian nature of East European communism (181).Piasecki's success came from his ability to position himself as a broker between Catholic Church, communist government, and, perhaps, Soviet influence. Piasecki was a devout Catholic, but his relationship with his Church was a contentious one. As founder and leader of PAX, a lay-Catholic organization that championed an alliance between Catholic Church and Poland's communist government, Piasecki struggled to retain influence with both institutions. When he championed communism, most notably in his 1956 book Essential Issues , he alienated Catholic Church and barely avoided excommunication. Without his Catholic credentials, he equally risked losing influence with Party, which tolerated his Catholicism precisely because it valued his influence with Church. As he scrambled to retain influence in both worlds, his life became a metaphor for struggle to balance nationalist, Catholic, and socialist forces in Poland.Piasecki's survival, and his persistent political influence for over forty years, is a testament to both his political savvy and his execrable opportunism. …
Read full abstract