Point Dose Verification Research Articles

Verifying institutionally developed hybrid 3D-printed coaxial cylindrical phantom for patient-specific quality assurance in stereotactic body radiation therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma.

An accurate and reliablepatient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) is crucial to ensure the safety and precision of Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study examines the effectiveness of a novel hybrid 3D-printed hybrid coaxial cylindrical phantom for PSQA in the SBRT of HCC. The study compared three different point dose verification techniques for PSQA: a traditional solid water phantom, two dimensional detector array I'MatriXX, and a newly developed hybrid 3D-printed phantom. Thirty SBRT HCC liver cases were examined using these techniques, and point doses were measured and compared to planned doses using the perpendicular composite method with solid water and I'MatriXX phantoms. Unlike the other two methods, the point dose was compared in true composite geometry using the hybrid 3D-printed phantom, which enhanced the accuracy and consistency of PSQA. The study aims to assess the statistical significance and accuracy of the hybrid 3D-printed phantom compared to other methods. The results showed all techniques complied with the institutional threshold criteria of within ± 3% for point-dose measurement discrepancies. The hybrid 3D-printed phantom was found to have better consistency with a lower standard deviation than traditional methods. Statistical analysis using Student's t-test revealed the statistical significance of the hybrid 3D-printed phantom technique in patient-specific point-dose assessments with a p-value < 0.01. The hybrid 3D-printed phantom developed institutionally is cost-effective and easy to handle. It has been proven to be a valuable tool for PSQA in SBRT for the treatment of HCC and has demonstrated its practicality and reliability.

Investigation of total skin helical tomotherapy using a 3D-printed total skin bolus

ObjectiveTo investigate the effectiveness of using a 3D-printed total skin bolus in total skin helical tomotherapy for the treatment of mycosis fungoides.Materials and methodsA 65-year-old female patient with a 3-year history of mycosis fungoides underwent treatment using an in-house desktop fused deposition modelling printer to create a total skin bolus made of a 5-mm-thick flexible material, which increased the skin dose through dose building. The patient's scan was segmented into upper and lower sections, with the division line placed 10 cm above the patella. The prescription was to deliver 24 Gy over 24 fractions, given 5 times per week. The plan parameters consisted of a field width of 5 cm, pitch of 0.287 and modulation factor of 3. The complete block was placed 4 cm away from the planned target region to reduce the area of the internal organs at risk, especially the bone marrow. Dose delivery accuracy was verified using point dose verification with a "Cheese" phantom (Gammex RMI, Middleton, WI), 3D plane dose verification with ArcCHECK (Model 1220, Sun Nuclear, Melbourne, FL), and multipoint film dose verification. Megavoltage computed tomography guidance was also utilized to ensure the accuracy of the setup and treatment.ResultsA 5-mm-thick 3D-printed suit was used as a bolus to achieve a target volume coverage of 95% of the prescribed dose. The conformity index and homogeneity index of the lower segment were slightly better than those of the upper segment. As the distance from the skin increased, the dose to the bone marrow gradually decreased, and the dose to other organs at risk remained within clinical requirements. The point dose verification deviation was less than 1%, the 3D plane dose verification was greater than 90%, and the multipoint film dose verification was less than 3%, all of which confirmed the accuracy of the delivered dose. The total treatment time was approximately 1.5 h, which included 0.5 h of wearing the 3D-printed suit and 1 h with the beam on. Patients only experienced mild fatigue, nausea or vomiting, low-grade fever, and grade III bone marrow suppression.ConclusionThe use of a 3D-printed suit for total skin helical tomotherapy can result in a uniform dose distribution, short treatment time, simple implementation process, good clinical outcomes, and low toxicity. This study presents an alternative treatment approach that can potentially yield improved clinical outcomes for mycosis fungoides.

Dose verification of virtual bolus application for helical tomotherapy.

The objective of the study is to verify the dose delivered on helical tomotherapy based on treatment plan with varying virtual bolus (VB) thickness. The target was localized on the ArcCHECK image by 3 mm margin from the phantom surface. The dimension of target, which includes the ArcCHECK's detectors, with the 4.0 cm width and length 12.0 cm along the phantom The 5 treatment plans were generated, 1 plan without VB application (NoVB) and the 4 plans with varying of VB thickness on the phantom surface by 0.5 cm (VB0.5), 1.0 cm (VB1.0), 1.5 cm (VB1.5), and 2.0 cm (VB2.0), in treatment planning but absent during irradiation. For measurement analysis, the ionization chamber and the ArcCHECK detectors were used for point dose and dose distribution by investigating the percentage of dose difference and the gamma passing rate. The VB thickness 0.5, 1.0 and 1.5 cm showed acceptable value with less than 2% for dose difference by 0.37% (VB0.5), -0.11% (VB1.0) and -0.37% (VB1.5) at the center of ArcCHECK. The accuracy of dose distribution showed an acceptable gamma passing rate of 99.8% (VB0.5), 100% (VB1.0), and 90.2% (VB1.5) for gamma criteria by 3%/3mm for absolute dose analysis. However, the gamma passing rate of VB2.0 down to 71.2% of absolute mode for gamma criteria by 3%/3mm. The treatment plans with VB thickness less than 15 mm deliver doses that are comparable to treatment plans without virtual bolus based on gamma analysis. However, the deviation showed a trend increasing when VB thickness increased. The VB2.0 was not acceptable for point dose and dose distribution verification by more than 2% dose difference and less than 90% of gamma passing rate.

EVALUATION OF PATIENT-SPECIFIC IMRT QUALITY ASSURANCE AND POINT DOSE MEASUREMENT FOR COMPLEX HEAD AND NECK AND BRAIN CANCER USING GAFCHROMIC EBT3 FILM.

Patient-specific intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) is essential for complex radiotherapy treatment as it involves complex intensity modulation and high-dose gradient regions. IMRT QA was performed by point dose verification and two-dimensional (2D) dose distribution measurement using gamma method. Calibrated External Beam Therapy 3 (EBT3) film was used for point dose and pre-treatment verification of 10 IMRT plans, five complex Head and Neck (HN) and five brain cases. The gamma passing rate (GPR) was evaluated for 3%/3mm gamma criteria and compared with 2D array. Isocentre dose was measured for all 10 IMRT plans on EBT3 film. Percentage deviation of point dose measurement from TPS calculated was found 0.4% for brain cases and 2.9% for HN cases. The GPR for 3%/3mm criteria was obtained higher than 95% for brain and HN cases. Results suggest that film dosimetry is also a reliable verification system for patient-specific IMRT QA as the 2D array.

Development of a quasi-humanoid phantom to perform dosimetric and radiobiological measurements for out-of-field doses from external beam radiation therapy.

Our understanding of low dose, out‐of‐field radiation and their radiobiological effects are limited, in part due to the rapid technological advances in external beam radiotherapy, especially for non‐coplanar and dynamic techniques. Reliable comparisons of out‐of‐field doses produced by advanced radiotherapy techniques are difficult due to the limitations of commercially available phantoms. There is a clear need for a functional phantom to accurately measure the dosimetric and radiobiological characteristics of out‐of‐field doses, which would in turn allow clinicians and medical physicists to optimize treatment parameters. We designed, manufactured, and tested the performance of a quasi‐humanoid (Q‐H) adult phantom. To test the physics parameters, we used computed tomography (CT) scans of assembled Q‐H phantom. Static open field and dynamic techniques were measured both in‐ and out‐of‐field with ionization chambers and radiochromic films for two configurations (full solid and with water‐filled containers). In the areas simulating soft tissues, lung, and bones, median Hounsfield units and densities were, respectively: 129.8, ‐738.7, 920.8 HU and 1.110, 0.215, 1.669 g/cm3. Comparison of the measured to treatment planning systems (TPS) in‐field dose values for the sample volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) (6 MV flattening filter‐free (FFF)) plan, 96.4% of analyzed points passed the gamma evaluation criteria (L2%/2 mm, threshold (TH) 10%) and less than 1.50% for point dose verification. In the two phantom configurations: full poly(methyl) methacrylate (PMMA) and with water container, the off‐axis median doses for open field, relative to the central axis of the beam (CAX) were similar, respectively: 0.900% versus 0.907% (15 cm distance to CAX); 0.096% versus 0.120% (35 cm); 0.018% versus 0.018% (52 cm); 0.009% versus 0.008% (74 cm). For VMAT 6 MV FFF, doses relative the CAX were, respectively: 0.667% (15 cm), 0.062% (35 cm), 0.019% (52 cm), 0.016% (74 cm). The Q‐H phantom meets the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) and American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) recommended phantom criteria, providing medical physicists with a reliable, comprehensive system to perform dose calculation and measurements and to assess the impact on radiobiological response and on the risk of secondary tumor induction.

Utility of Point Dose Verification Using Measured Ionization Amount Ratio of Reference Irradiation to Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

In the point dose verification of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), we compared the commonly used method of measuring absolute dose (absolute method) with the measurement method by the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Task Group 119, which describes the point dose verification for IMRT using the ratio of reference irradiation and measured ionization. The target was 66 plans for head and neck cancer, 46 plans for lung cancer with 6 MV X-ray, and 31 plans for prostate cancer with 10 MV X-ray. They were treated with volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Each plan was evaluated by the absolute method and the TG119 method using 3D-array. The average and 2SD of the verification results for head and neck cancer, lung cancer, and prostate cancer were 0.129±2.185%, 0.963±2.125%, and 0.259±2.019% by the absolute method, and 0.952±2.039%, 1.704±2.080%, and 0.524±1.274% by the TG119 method. The ratio between the average of the TG119 method and the absolute method corresponded to the error of reference irradiation dose. Considering that the measurement method is simple, the TG119 method enables more stable point dose verification of VMAT.

Validation of absolute point dosimetry by the analytical anisotropic algorithm and Acuros XB algorithm employing intensity-modulated radiotherapy technique on an in-house develop cost-effective heterogeneous thorax phantom.

Dose validation inside the human body needs a medium which can simulate the actual heterogeneities of a specific body site. The aim of the present work is to study the properties of a cost-effective heterogeneous thorax phantom (HTP) developed in-house by the author and its application for the evaluation of patient-specific absolute point dosimetry by employing analytic anisotropic algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm. HTP was made from the dust of porous pinewood, rib cage, and honeybee's wax. Density and central axis isodose depth distribution was measured on computed tomography images of actual patient and on HTP. Absolute point dose verification of 35 patients was done using AAA and AXB algorithm. The difference in the calculated dose by AAA and AXB was compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Density distribution and central axis depth dose inside the HTP compare well with that of an actual patient. The mean percentage variation between the planned and the measured doses inside the HTP was found to be 4.85 (standard deviation [SD] = 3.38) and 1.3 (SD = 2.93), respectively, using AAA and AXB algorithm. The difference in the measured dose and the planned dose was found to be significant for AAA with the significance level of 0.01 (p-value < 0.00001), whereas it was found to be insignificant (p-value < 0.00001) for AXB. The results of this study showed that the HTP is resembled with the human thorax in terms of its heterogeneities and radiological properties and can be used for pretreatment plan verification.

Effect of Relative Electron Density and Physical Density Adjustment in Patient-specific Quality Assurance Using PMMA Phantom

The purpose of this study was to improve the accuracy of dose-distribution calculations by understanding how the calculated dose varies with the change in the relative electron density replacing polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) in patient-specific quality assurance. We calculated the relative electron density at which dose attenuation in each dose calculation algorithm coincides with the measured value of the dose attenuation of single-field irradiation. Next, the dose change was calculated by changing the relative electron density or physical electron density for substituting PMMA for each X-ray energy and calculation algorithm. Furthermore, using clinical plans, changes in point-dose verification and dose-distribution verification that occurred when the relative electron density or physical electron density was varied were investigated. The dose attenuation varies depending on the dose-calculation algorithm, and the optimum value of the electron density is different for each. After the electron density optimization, the point dose verification using the 97.1% to 98.3% (3%/3 mm), 90.0% to 94.3% (2%/3 mm) and gained a dominant improvement tendency (P<0.001). We clarified dose change accompanying relative electron density or physical electron density change. We concluded that the accuracy of dose-distribution calculation for verification improves by replacing PMMA with optimal relative electron density or physical electron density.

Design, Fabrication, and Validation of a Polymethyl Methacrylate Head Phantom for Dosimetric Verification of Cranial Radiotherapy Treatment Plans.

Purpose:The present study aims to design and fabricate a novel, versatile, and cost-effective Polymethyl Methacrylate (PMMA) head phantom for the dosimetric pretreatment verification of radiotherapy (RT) treatment plans.Materials and Methods:The head phantom designing involves slice-wise modeling of an adult head using PMMA. The phantom has provisions to hold detectors such as ionization chambers of different sizes, Gafchromic films, gel dosimeter, and optically stimulated luminescence dosimeter. For the point dose verification purpose, 15 volumetric modulated arc therapy patient plans were selected, and doses were measured using a CC13 ionization chamber. The percentage gamma passing rate was calculated for acceptance criteria 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm using OmniPro I’mRT film QA software, and Gafchromic EBT3 films were used for 2D planar dose verification.Results:Treatment planning system calculated, and the measured point doses showed a percentage deviation ranged from 0.26 to 1.92. The planar dose fluence measurements, for set acceptance criteria of 3%/3 mm and 2%/2 mm, percentages of points having gamma value <1 were in the range of 99.17 ± 0.25 to 99.88 ± 0.15 and 93.16 ± 0.38 to 98.89 ± 0.23, respectively. Measured dose verification indices were within the acceptable limit.Conclusions:The dosimetric study reveals that head phantom can be used for routine pretreatment verification for the cranial RT, especially for stereotactic radiosurgery/RT as a part of patient-specific quality assurance. The presently fabricated and validated phantom is novel, versatile, and cost-effective, and many institutes can afford it.

National survey of patient specific IMRT quality assurance in China

BackgroundTo analyze and present the China’s national survey on patient-specific IMRT quality assurance (QA).MethodsA national survey was conducted in all radiotherapy centers in China to collect comprehensive information on status of IMRT QA practice, including machine, technique, equipment, issues and suggestions.ResultsFour hundred and three centers responded to this survey, accounting for 56.92% of all the centers implementing IMRT in China. The total number of medical physicists and the total number of patients treated with IMRT annually in these centers was 1599 and 305,000 respectively. All centers implemented measurement-based verification. Point dose verification and 2D dose verification was implemented in 331 and 399 centers, respectively. Three hundred forty-eight centers had 2D arrays, and 52 centers had detector devices designed to measure VMAT beams. EPID and film were used in 78 and 70 centers, respectively. Seventeen and 20 centers used log file and 3D DVH analysis, respectively. One hundred sixty-eight centers performed measurement-based verification not for each patient based on different selection criteria. The techniques and methods varied significantly in both point dose and dose distribution verification, from evaluation metrics, criteria, tolerance limit, and steps to check failed IMRT QA plans. Major issues identified in this survey were the limited resources of physicists, QA devices, and linacs.ConclusionsIMRT QA was implemented in all the surveyed centers. The practice of IMRT QA varied significantly between centers. An increase in personnel, QA devices and linacs is highly desired. National standard, guideline, regulation and training programs are urgently needed in China for consistent and effective implementation of IMRT QA.

Feasibility of integrated IMRT technique for craniospinal irradiation in a supine position

Objective To explore the feasibility and safety of integrated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technology applied in craniospinal irradiation in a supine position. Methods The patients were fixed in a supine position using thermoplastic mask and vacuum mat. Three isocenters with a fixed interval of 20-25 cm were adopted according to the height of patients. A total of 13 beams with a length of 2-3 cm in the overlapping region were included in the treatment plan. Fixed jaw technique was employed and overall calculation was performed by the inverse optimization method. The γ-passing rate and absolute point dose verification were performed for three isocenters and two overlapping regions. Cone-beam CT (CBCT) images were scanned for three isocenters before treatment. The setup error of each isocenter in the x, y and z directions of the same coordinate system was recorded and overall analysis was conducted. Results Among 28 patients, the γ-passing rate (%) of three isocenters and two overlapping regions was 99.36%, 99.60%, 99.75%, 94.77% and 95.09%, whereas the absolute point dose verification error was 1.56%, -1.56%, 0.52%, -0.76% and -1.68%, respectively. Twenty-eight patients received 162 groups of IGRT with 486 setup errors from the CBCT images. The average deviation in the x, y and z direction for three isocenters (neck, chest and abdomen) was 0.17 mm, 0.10 mm, 0.02 mm, 0.06 mm, 0.04 mm, 0.46 mm, 0.19 mm, 0.26 mm and 0.41 mm, respectively. Conclusions The integrated IMRT techniques for craniospinal irradiation in a supine position is feasible and safe, which is worthy of clinical application. Key words: Craniospinal irradiation; Supine position; Dose match; Setup error; Dose verification

Point dose verification in breast cancer radiotherapy: comparison between 3D conformal and IMRT technique

The aim of this work was to verify multi point dose of the 3D-CRT and IMRT in the case of breast cancer. The experiment was perfomed at Siloam Hospital using Linac Trilogy and TPS Eclipse ver. 11. For measurements, Gafchromic film EBT3 was employed in this work in which the EBT3 film was distributed at 5 different points (trachea, axilla, and mammari interna, nipple, mamme inferior). Then, the statistical comparison between the dose measurement between 3D-CRT and IMRT techniques was evaluated. Moreover, the comparison of dose measurement between the non mastectomy and mastectomy group was also carried out. The result of differences in dose shows the trachea dose in the 3D-CRT is smaller than the IMRT in both the non mastectomy and mastectomy patients. The dose at the axilla, internal mammary, nipple, and inferior mammae are greater in the 3D-CRT than IMRT techniques in both non mastectomy and mastectomy patients. The dosage difference between TPS and EBT3 film in the range of from 0.66% to 5.67% (3D-CRT) and -0.67% to -7.57% (IMRT). The statistical test showed there was no difference of mean dose (sig 2 tailed > 0,025) between non mastectomy and mastectomy patients group and 3D-CRT and IMRT.

P254] Local gamma index analysis - new approach

Purpose The gamma index analysis is a well-known approach in radiotherapy. The weakest point of widely accepted gamma index method seems to be choosing global approach. Choosing one normalization value for all points in the plan can hide potential errors, especially in its high-gradient, medium and low dose areas. In this study, the new metrics based on the local gamma analysis were introduced. Methods All analyses were performed for the TG 119 IMRT tests. The suite structures were copied to the CT scan of I’mRT Phantom (Scanditronix). Plans were prepared according to AAPM TG 119 report. All measurements were performed using Cliniac 2300C/D (Varian). The recommended point dose and plan verification by EPID were performed to confirm compliance of plans with requirements. Additional measurments with the use of ArcCHECK (SunNuclear) device and dedicated software were caried out. To perform proposed local gamma analysis the planned dose file created by TPS and the measured dose file generated by SNC software were used. Three forms of metrics were used: gamma index metric by the definition, metric proposed by Van Dyk and dose difference metric. The reference tolerance value of distance-to-agreement was set globally to 3 mm. We propose two local approaches to gamma analysis: a physics-based local approach which explicitly accounts for the physics underlying the radiation therapy process (dose value measured in local point is a random variable drawn from a Poisson distribution characterized by an expected value equal to planned dose D and standard deviation proportional to D0.5) and a clustering-based approach, which is based on clustering of the dose values read by the detectors. In the latter case two clustering methods were implemented: K-means clustering of detector readings, and Gaussian mixture clustering of detector readings. Results The planning objectives for TG 119 IMRT tests were generally met. Using proposed local approaches we were able to successfully carry out local gamma analysis of plans. We compared advantages and disadvantages of methods based on standard global and proposed local approach. Conclusions Proposed solutions have the potential to improve QA practice referring to the agreement between calculated and measured dose distributions.

A 3D correction method for predicting the readings of a PinPoint chamber on the CyberKnife® M6™ machine

The use of small fields in radiation therapy techniques has increased substantially in particular in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). However, as field size reduces further still, the response of the detector changes more rapidly with field size, and the effects of measurement uncertainties become increasingly significant due to the lack of lateral charged particle equilibrium, spectral changes as a function of field size, detector choice, and subsequent perturbations of the charged particle fluence. This work presents a novel 3D dose volume-to-point correction method to predict the readings of a 0.015 cc PinPoint chamber (PTW 31014) for both small static-fields and composite-field dosimetry formed by fixed cones on the CyberKnife® M6™ machine.A 3D correction matrix is introduced to link the 3D dose distribution to the response of the PinPoint chamber in water. The parameters of the correction matrix are determined by modeling its 3D dose response in circular fields created using the 12 fixed cones (5 mm–60 mm) on a CyberKnife® M6™ machine. A penalized least-square optimization problem is defined by fitting the calculated detector reading to the experimental measurement data to generate the optimal correction matrix; the simulated annealing algorithm is used to solve the inverse optimization problem. All the experimental measurements are acquired for every 2 mm chamber shift in the horizontal planes for each field size. The 3D dose distributions for the measurements are calculated using the Monte Carlo calculation with the MultiPlan® treatment planning system (Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA, USA). The performance evaluation of the 3D conversion matrix is carried out by comparing the predictions of the output factors (OFs), off-axis ratios (OARs) and percentage depth dose (PDD) data to the experimental measurement data. The discrepancy of the measurement and the prediction data for composite fields is also performed for clinical SRS plans.The optimization algorithm used for generating the optimal correction factors is stable, and the resulting correction factors were smooth in the spatial domain. The measurement and prediction of OFs agree closely with percentage differences of less than 1.9% for all the 12 cones. The discrepancies between the prediction and the measurement PDD readings at 50 mm and 80 mm depth are 1.7% and 1.9%, respectively. The percentage differences of OARs between measurement and prediction data are less than 2% in the low dose gradient region, and 2%/1 mm discrepancies are observed within the high dose gradient regions. The differences between the measurement and prediction data for all the CyberKnife based SRS plans are less than 1%.These results demonstrate the existence and efficiency of the novel 3D correction method for small field dosimetry. The 3D correction matrix links the 3D dose distribution and the reading of the PinPoint chamber. The comparison between the predicted reading and the measurement data for static small fields (OFs, OARs and PDDs) yield discrepancies within 2% for low dose gradient regions and 2%/1 mm for high dose gradient regions; the discrepancies between the predicted and the measurement data are less than 1% for all the SRS plans. The 3D correction method provides an access to evaluate the clinical measurement data and can be applied to non-standard composite fields intensity modulated radiation therapy point dose verification.

Application of detector array in treatment planning system modeling adjustment

Objective To investigate the feasibility of detector array in Monaco modeling for MLC parameters adjustment. Methods One parameter was fixed, and then the other parameter was changed. The γ pass rates of the test beams, namely 3ABUT, 7SegA, and FOUR L, were assessed to determine the values of leaf transmission and leaf offset. A total of 12 tumor cases from different anatomical sites were randomly selected. Two-dimensional dose verification (rack angle zero) of Step& Shot and dMLC plans as well as three-dimensional dose validation of VMAT plan were performed using Octavius 4D system. The γ pass rates were analyzed at a standard of 3%/3 mm. Meanwhile, the point dose verification for these three plans was analyzed to obtain the dose deviations. Results The values of leaf transmission and leaf offset were 0.0105 and-0.08 mm, respectively. The average γ pass rates (%) of Step& Shot, dMLC, and VMAT plans were 88.59±2.94, 87.81±3.28, and 87.45±2.24 before adjustment and 98.45±1.23, 98.9±1.01, and 96.03±1.66 after adjustment. In addition, the average dose deviations (%) according to the point dose verification were 0.85±0.75, 0.95±0.39, and 0.98±0.40 before adjustment and 0.97±0.57, 1.08±0.76, and 0.86±0.45 after adjustment. Conclusions Octavius detector 729 ionization chamber array is a feasible and reliable device in Monaco modeling for MLC parameters adjustment. Key words: Post modeling adjustment; Detector array; γpass rates; Leaf transmission; Leaf offset

A robust measurement point for dose verification in delivery quality assurance for a robotic radiosurgery system.

In this CyberKnife® dose verification study, we investigated the effectiveness of the novel potential error (PE) concept when applied to the determination of a robust measurement point for targeting errors. PE was calculated by dividing the differences between the maximum increases and decreases in dose distributions by the original distribution after obtaining the former by shifting the source-to-axis and off-axis distances of each beam by ±1.0 mm. Thus, PE values and measurement point dose heterogeneity were analyzed in 48 patients who underwent CyberKnife radiotherapy. Sixteen patients who received isocentric dose delivery were set as the control group, whereas 32 who received non-isocentric dose delivery were divided into two groups of smaller PE (SPE) and larger PE (LPE) by using their median PE value. The mean dose differences (± standard deviations) were 1.0 ± 0.9%, 0.5 ± 1.4% and 4.1 ± 2.8% in the control, SPE and LPE groups, respectively. We observed significant correlations of the dose difference with the PE value (r = 0.582, P < 0.001) and dose heterogeneity (r = 0.471, P < 0.001). We concluded that when determining a robust measurement point for CyberKnife point dose verification, PE evaluation was more effective than the conventional dose heterogeneity-based method that introduced optimal measurement point dose heterogeneity of <10% across the detector.

Comparison of dosimeter response: ionization chamber, TLD, and Gafchromic EBT2 film in 3D-CRT, IMRT, and SBRT techniques for lung cancer

This research was conducted by measuring point dose in the target area (lungs), heart, and spine using four dosimeters (PTW N30013, Exradin A16, TLD, and the Gafchromic EBT2 film). The measurement was performed in CIRS 002LFC thorax phantom. The main objective of this study was to compare the dosimetry of those different systems. Dose measurements performed only in a single fraction of irradiation. The measurements result shown that TLD has the least accuracy and precision. As the effect of volume averaging, ionization chamber reaches the discrepancy value up to -13.30% in the target area. EBT2 film has discrepancy value of <1% in the 3D-CRT and IMRT techniques. This dosimeter is proposed to be an appropriate alternative dosimeter to be used at point dose verification.

Quality assurance of simultaneous treatment of two targets in pelvic region planned with single isocenter using three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) technique

Purpose : The purpose of this study was to conduct quality assurance of a three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) of two targets in pelvis region planned with single isocenter technique. Methods: A treatment plan was generated with two identical water phantoms with ionization chamber (IC) sleeves (IC-1 & IC-2), simulated as if targets are in pelvis region, simultaneously irradiated with single isocenter technique with a dose prescription of 300 cGy for point dose verification. A two dimensional ion chamber array detector was used for fluence verification. Results: Calculated minimum, mean and maximum dose (in cGy) for IC-1 & IC-2 were 295, 303 and 307 as per dose volume histogram. The global dose maximum was found to be 307.4 cGy. Measured point doses to both lesions were within ±2.5% of the computed dose. A pass percentage of 97% was obtained with the set of criteria 3 mm distance to agreement and 3% dose difference for fluence verification. Conclusion: Treatment execution of two targets simultaneously with single isocenter can reduce positional errors and delivery time.

SU‐E‐T‐762: Toward Volume‐Based Independent Dose Verification as Secondary Check

Purpose:Lung SBRT plan has been shifted to volume prescription technique. However, point dose agreement is still verified using independent dose verification at the secondary check. The volume dose verification is more affected by inhomogeneous correction rather than point dose verification currently used as the check. A feasibility study for volume dose verification was conducted in lung SBRT plan.Methods:Six SBRT plans were collected in our institute. Two dose distributions with / without inhomogeneous correction were generated using Adaptive Convolve (AC) in Pinnacle3. Simple MU Analysis (SMU, Triangle Product, Ishikawa, JP) was used as the independent dose verification software program, in which a modified Clarkson‐based algorithm was implemented and radiological path length was computed using CT images independently to the treatment planning system. The agreement in point dose and mean dose between the AC with / without the correction and the SMU were assessed.Results:In the point dose evaluation for the center of the GTV, the difference shows the systematic shift (4.5% ± 1.9 %) in comparison of the AC with the inhomogeneous correction, on the other hands, there was good agreement of 0.2 ± 0.9% between the SMU and the AC without the correction. In the volume evaluation, there were significant differences in mean dose for not only PTV (14.2 ± 5.1 %) but also GTV (8.0 ± 5.1 %) compared to the AC with the correction. Without the correction, the SMU showed good agreement for GTV (1.5 ± 0.9%) as well as PTV (0.9% ± 1.0%).Conclusion:The volume evaluation for secondary check may be possible in homogenous region. However, the volume including the inhomogeneous media would make larger discrepancy. Dose calculation algorithm for independent verification needs to be modified to take into account the inhomogeneous correction.

SU‐E‐T‐188: Commission of World 1st Commercial Compact PBS Proton System

Purpose:ProteusONE is the 1st commercial compact PBS proton system with an upstream scanning gantry and C230 cyclotron. We commissioned XiO and Raystation TPS simultaneously. This is a summary of beam data collection, modeling, and verification and comparison without range shiter for this unique system with both TPS.Methods:Both Raystation and XiO requires the same measurements data: (i) integral depth dose(IDDs) of single central spot measured in water tank; (ii) absolute dose calibration measured at 2cm depth of water with mono‐energetic 10×10 cm2 field with spot spacing 4mm, 1MU per spot; and (iii) beam spot characteristics in air at 0cm and ± 20cm away from ISO. To verify the beam model for both TPS, same 15 cube plans were created to simulate different treatment sites, target volumes and positions. PDDs of each plan were measured using a Multi‐layer Ionization Chamber(MLIC), absolute point dose verification were measured using PPC05 in water tank and patient‐specific QA were measured using MatriXX PT, a 2D ion chamber array.Results:All the point dose measurements at midSOBP were within 2% for both XiO and Raystation. However, up to 5% deviations were observed in XiO's plans at shallow depth while within 2% in Raystation plans. 100% of the ranges measured were within 1 mm with maximum deviation of 0.5 mm. 20 patient specific plan were generated and measured in 3 planes (distal, proximal and midSOBP) in Raystation. The average of gamma index is 98.7%±3% with minimum 94%Conclusions:Both TPS were successfully commissioned and can be safely deployed for clinical use for ProteusONE. Based on our clinical experience in PBS planning, user interface, function and workflow, we preferably use Raystation as our main clinical TPS. Gamma Index &gt;95% at 3%/3 mm criteria is our institution action level for patient specific plan QAs.