Keith Tuma, ed, Anthology of Twentieth-Century British & Irish Poetry. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 941 pp. Edna Longley, ed, The Bloodaxe Book of Twentieth Century Poetry. Tarset, Northumberland, U.K.: Bloodaxe Books, 2000. 368 pp. The anthology wars are breaking out in Britain again. The U.S. had them in the 1960s; Britain had a mild skirmish in the same decade, and Australia suffered in the 1970s and early 1980s. The first shots in the latest conflict have come from unexpected positions, and the conflict can be expected to widen as more observers try to sum up the century that has recently come to an end. Anthologies are invariably more about exclusion than they are about inclusion. They are often about political positions. Very few are evenhanded and honest enough to include material that is of doubtful value to the anthologist but which is nonetheless representative of significant developments or strands of opinion that require the serious reader's attention. Most postwar British and Irish anthologies have by and large tended to concentrate their surveys upon those strands of development associated with The Movement, The Group, Hughes, Heaney, Hill, the post-- Heaney Northern Irish poets, and all their various descendants. The keynote anthologies of the past half-century (in other words, all of those published during that period by Faber, Oxford, or Penguin, with the sole exception of the Lucie-Smith volume mentioned below), are irritatingly blinkered, are uniformly poor at spotting rising young talent, and are overindulgent towards powerful reputations or FotAs-- Friends of the Anthologist. There have also been some corrective anthologies that have sought to survey alternative traditions and, now that the twentieth century has passed into history, the first steps are being taken to sum up the whole of that period's poetic endeavors. Since the first edition of Edward Lucie-Smith's British Poetry Since 1945 (Penguin, 1970), no editor has tried to survey the whole spectrum of verse in Ireland and the U.K., regardless of which creative wing the poets inhabit, and even that book's 1985 second edition neglected to update the selection of innovative/experimental/avantgarde poets (choose your preferred terminology) on the curious-- and incorrect-grounds that nothing of interest had happened in the intervening fifteen years to necessitate such an update. This selective blindness suffered by the majority of anthologists over the past few decades has not just affected the wild avant-garde; there have been a number of fine poets working in more mainstream styles who have also been ignored by most standard anthologies, for no obvious reason other than that of fashion: Harry Guest, Penelope Shuttle, Jonathan Griffin, F.T. Prince, Michael Hamburger, Karen Gershon, Rosemary Tonks, Francis Berry, David Wevill, to name but a few. As the last century drew to a close, a number of attempts at mapping the poetic territory began to appear. Some of these were no more than the usual periodic updates on contemporary activity, such as we can expect from the major publishers every twenty years or so; thus, Sean O'Brien's rather predictable The Firebox: Poetry in Britain and Ireland After 1945 (Picador, 1998) and Simon Armitage and Robert Crawford's startlingly narrow-minded Penguin Book of Poetry from Britain and Ireland Since 1945 (Penguin, 1998). More ambitious, and ranging over the whole century are Edna Longley's The Bloodaxe Book of Twentieth Century Poetry (Bloodaxe Books, 2000) and Michael Schmidt's The Harvill Book of Twentieth Century Poetry in English (Harvill, 1999). Although the latter volume tries to cover the whole Anglophone universe, it devotes a page-count to the U.K. and Ireland similar to that afforded Professor Longley by Bloodaxe. (Despite the inclusive title of the Longley book, it contains only British and Irish writers). And although the Schmidt volume is as unpredictable as one would expect from the publisher of Carcanet Press (which carries a number of fine non-mainstream poets), its analysis of Britain and Ireland is still rooted in the postwar mainstream consensus. …
Read full abstract