Pneumonectomy For Primary Lung Cancer Research Articles

Development and validation of web-based dynamic nomograms predictive of disease-free and overall survival in patients who underwent pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer.

The tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system is insufficient to precisely distinguish the long-term survival of patients who underwent pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer. Therefore, this study sought to identify determinants of disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for incorporation into web-based dynamic nomograms. The clinicopathological variables, surgical methods and follow-up information of 1,261 consecutive patients who underwent pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer between January 2008 and December 2018 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were collected. Nomograms for predicting DFS and OS were built based on the significantly independent predictors identified in the training cohort (n = 1,009) and then were tested on the validation cohort (n = 252). The concordance index (C-index) and time-independent area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve (AUC) assessed the nomogram's discrimination accuracy. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was applied to evaluate the clinical utility. During a median follow-up time of 40.5 months, disease recurrence and death were observed in 446 (35.4%) and 665 (52.7%) patients in the whole cohort, respectively. In the training cohort, a higher C-reactive protein to albumin ratio, intrapericardial pulmonary artery ligation, lymph node metastasis, and adjuvant therapy were significantly correlated with a higher risk for disease recurrence; similarly, the independent predictors for worse OS were intrapericardial pulmonary artery and vein ligation, higher T stage, lymph node metastasis, and no adjuvant therapy. In the validation cohort, the integrated DFS and OS nomograms showed well-fitted calibration curves and yielded good discrimination powers with C-index of 0.667 (95% confidence intervals CIs [0.610-0.724]) and 0.697 (95% CIs [0.649-0.745]), respectively. Moreover, the AUCs for 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year DFS were 0.655, 0.726, and 0.735, respectively, and those for 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS were 0.741, 0.765, and 0.709, respectively. DCA demonstrated that our nomograms could bring more net benefit than the TNM staging system. Although pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer has brought encouraging long-term outcomes, the constructed prediction models could assist in precisely identifying patients at high risk and developing personalized treatment strategies to further improve survival.

Pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer: contemporary outcomes, risk factors and model validation.

OBJECTIVESDespite the increased rate of adverse outcomes compared to lobectomy, for selected patients with lung cancer, pneumonectomy is considered the optimal treatment option. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for mortality in patients undergoing pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer.METHODSData from all patients undergoing pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer at 2 large thoracic surgical centres between 2012 and 2018 were analysed. Multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors associated with 90-day and 1-year mortality and reduced long-term survival, respectively.RESULTSThe study included 256 patients. The mean age was 65.2 (standard deviation 9.4) years. In-hospital, 90-day and 1-year mortality were 6.3% (n = 16), 9.8% (n = 25) and 28.1% (n = 72), respectively. The median follow-up time was 31.5 months (interquartile range 9–58 months). Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had a significantly increased risk of 90-day [odds ratio 6.451, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.867–22.291, P = 0.003] and 1-year mortality (odds ratio 2.454, 95% CI 1.079–7.185, P = 0.044). Higher Performance Status score was associated with higher 1-year mortality (odds ratio 2.055, 95% CI 1.248–3.386, P = 0.005) and reduced overall survival (hazard ratio 1.449, 95% CI 1.086–1.934, P = 0.012). Advanced (stage III/IV) disease was associated with reduced overall survival (hazard ratio 1.433, 95% CI 1.019–2.016, P = 0.039). Validation of a pneumonectomy-specific risk model demonstrated inadequate model performance (area under the curve 0.54).CONCLUSIONSPneumonectomy remains associated with a high rate of perioperative mortality. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, Performance Status score and advanced disease emerged as the key variables associated with adverse outcomes after pneumonectomy in our cohort.

Postoperative atrial fibrillation in pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer.

BackgroundThis study assessed the incidence and risk factors (RFs) of postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) and its impact on clinical outcomes in patients undergoing pneumonectomy for lung cancer.MethodsBetween 2013 and 2018, this monocentric retrospective study enrolled 324 consecutive pneumonectomy patients for primary lung cancer from our institution and 350 lobectomy and 349 segmentectomy cases matched by age, sex and body mass index (BMI). RF for POAF and postoperative death in pneumonectomy patients were assessed by logistic regression, and long-term outcomes after a median follow-up of 30 (range, 2–61) months by Cox proportional hazard model. Electrophysiology study (EPS) files of 30 AF patients with lung resection history were reviewed.ResultsPOAF developed more often after pneumonectomy than lobectomy and segmentectomy (23.2% vs. 6.6% vs. 1.4%, respectively; P<0.001). Among 75 pneumonectomy patients with POAF, POAF was solitary in 55 patients (73.3%) and concurrent with other complications in 3 patients (4%). POAF risk after pneumonectomy was 4 and 22 times that after lobectomy and segmentectomy, respectively, with age >60 years and left atrial diameter (LAd) ≥35 mm as independent predictors. POAF, infection and hemorrhage were independent RFs for perioperative death after pneumonectomy; however, POAF was not RF for long-term death. Pulmonary vein (PV) trigger was identified in 60% (18/30) of AF patients with lung resection history, with stump PVs being more active than non-stump PVs (38.2% vs. 10.5%, P<0.001).ConclusionsPost-pneumonectomy AF, with remarkable incidence, risk and independent predictors including age >60 years and LAd ≥35 mm, was mostly solitary and possibly secondary to stump and non-stump PV triggers. POAF, along with infection and hemorrhage, was a RF for perioperative death.

Pneumonectomy for Lung Cancer Treatment in The Netherlands: Between-Hospital Variation and Outcomes

BackgroundPneumonectomy in lung cancer treatment is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Its use is reserved only for patients in whom a complete oncological resection by (sleeve) lobectomy is not possible. It is unclear whether a patients’ risk of receiving a pneumonectomy is equally distributed. This study examined between-hospital variation of pneumonectomy use for primary lung cancer in the Netherlands.MethodsData from the Dutch Lung Cancer Audit for Surgery from 2012 to 2016 were used to study the use of pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer in the Netherlands. Using multivariable logistic regression, factors associated with pneumonectomy use were identified and the expected number of pneumonectomies per hospital was determined. Subsequently, the observed/expected ratio (O/E ratio) per hospital was calculated to study between-hospital differences.ResultsOf the 8446 included patients, 659 (7.8%) underwent a pneumonectomy with a mean postoperative mortality of 7.1% (n = 47). Factors associated with receiving a pneumonectomy were age, gender, cardiac and pulmonary comorbidities, tumor side, size and histopathology. The pneumonectomy use in the Netherlands varied considerably between hospitals (IQR 5.5–10.1%). Three hospitals out of 51 performed significantly less pneumonectomies than expected (O/E ratio < 0.5) and three significantly more (O/E ratio > 1.7). In the latter group, severe complications were more frequent, taking other influencing factors into account (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.05–2.19).ConclusionsThere is a considerable between-hospital variation in pneumonectomy use in lung cancer treatment. To further optimize surgical lung cancer care, we suggest center-specific feedback on pneumonectomy use and the development of a risk-adjusted pneumonectomy indicator.

PS01.236: MEDIASTINOSCOPIC SALVAGE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR RECURRENT ESOPHAGEAL CANCER AFTER DEFINITIVE CHEMORADIOTHERAPY IN A PREVIOUSLY PNEUMONECTOMIZED PATIENT

Abstract Background Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy is a minimally invasive surgery for thoracic esophageal cancer avoiding one-lung ventilation or transthoracic procedure. Methods We performed for the first time in the literature, salvage esophagectomy with combination of mediastinoscopic cervical approach and laparoscopic/mediastinoscopic transhiatal approach for recurrent thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) after definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) in a patient who had previously undergone a left pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer. Results A 66-year-old man was diagnosed as local recurrence of lower ESCC (cT3N0M0 cStage II) at 9 years after dCRT. His medical history included left-sided pneumonectomy for lung adenocarcinoma 9 years previously. Then the patient was diagnosed as lower thoracic ESCC (cT3N1M0 cStage III) at 2 months after pneumonectomy. He received dCRT consisting of CDDP/5-FU infusion and irradiation (60 Gy) and achieved complete response. No evidence of tumor recurrence was observed at endoscopic surveillance up until 6 years after dCRT. For this present surgery, a cervical wound was made and the intramediastinal procedure was performed under pneumomediastinum. After mobilization of upper/middle thoracic esophagus, the esophageal wall was safely separated from the remaining part and the stump of the left main bronchus. Dense adhesions between the esophagus and fibrotic tissue at the site of previous left mediastinal pleural resection was divided using a sealing device. In the abdomen, 5 ports were inserted to perform abdominal and transhiatal procedures under CO2 insufflation. After mobilization of the stomach, fibrotic scar tissue around the lower esophagus was divided using a sealing device and the peri-esophageal space dissected from cervical and transhiatal approach were connected to completely mobilize the thoracic esophagus. The esophagectomy was uneventfully carried out followed by reconstruction with gastric conduit via retrosternal rout. Pathological findings demonstrated a moderately differentiated ESCC (pT3-AD pN1 M0 pStage III), indicating that R0 resection was successfully performed. The patient has been closely observed as an outpatient and was alive and healthy at 3 months after the operation without tumor recurrence. Conclusion Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy is a safe and curative treatment strategy for esophageal cancer patients who had a previous pneumonectomy, even in salvage surgery for recurrent cancer after dCRT. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Pneumonectomy for lung cancer: Contemporary national early morbidity and mortality outcomes

The study objective was to determine contemporary early outcomes associated with pneumonectomy for lung cancer and to identify their predictors using a nationally representative general thoracic surgery database (EPITHOR). After discarding inconsistent files, a group of 4498 patients who underwent elective pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer between 2003 and 2013 was selected. Logistic regression analysis was performed on variables for mortality and major adverse events. Then, a propensity score analysis was adjusted for imbalances in baseline characteristics between patients with or without neoadjuvant treatment. Operative mortality was 7.8%. Surgical, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and infectious complications rates were 14.9%, 14.1%, 11.5%, and 2.7%, respectively. None of these complications were predicted by the performance of a neoadjuvant therapy. Operative mortality analysis, adjusted for the propensity scores, identified age greater than 65 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-2.9; P<.001), underweight body mass index category (OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4.0; P=.009), American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 3 or greater (OR, 2.310; 95% CI, 1.615-3.304; P<.001), right laterality of the procedure (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1-2.4; P=.011), performance of an extended pneumonectomy (OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P=.018), and absence of systematic lymphadenectomy (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.1-7.8; P=.027) as risk predictors. Induction therapy (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9; P=.005) and overweight body mass index category (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9; P=.033) were protective factors. Several risk factors for major adverse early outcomes after pneumonectomy for cancer were identified. Overweight patients and those who received induction therapy had paradoxically lower adjusted risks of mortality.

Sudden Loss of Ventilation Through a Double-Lumen Endotracheal Tube Requiring a Surgical Bronchotomy

A left completion pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer (left lower lobectomy) was complicated by sudden loss of ability to ventilate the patient through the double-lumen endotracheal tube. The problem could not be overcome by the anesthesiologist. In the face of impending cardiorespiratory arrest, a single-lumen tube was introduced through an incision in the left main bronchus through to the right main bronchus. This life-saving maneuver safeguarded the airway and permitted a successful outcome to the operation.

The impact of induction therapy on morbidity and operative mortality after resection of primary lung cancer

Use and operative results of neoadjuvant therapy before major elective resection for primary lung cancer were examined in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgical Database. Lobectomy and pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer were identified in 12,201 patients between January 2002 and June 2008. After excluding procedures for missing clinical staging or end points; institutions with more than 10% missing data for clinical stage, discharge mortality, or length of stay; and patients treated with chemotherapy or radiation for unrelated disease, there remained 5376 resections. Study end points were discharge mortality, length of stay more than 14 days, and major morbidity. Multivariate analysis using propensity scores stratified into quintiles measured the effect of induction therapy. In 525 of 5376 procedures (9.8%), chemotherapy (n = 153), radiotherapy (23), or chemoradiotherapy (349) preceded resection. Compared with resection only, patients receiving induction therapy were younger and had fewer comorbidities, more reoperative surgery, and higher rates of pneumonectomy. Clinical IIIA-N2 disease was treated with induction therapy in only 203 of 397 patients (51.1%). Propensity-adjusted rates detected no difference in discharge mortality, prolonged length of stay, or a composite of major morbidity for patients receiving induction therapy. Similar results were obtained in a logistic regression model (discharge mortality P = .9883; prolonged hospital stay P = .9710; major morbidity P = .9678). Less than 10% of all major lung resections for primary carcinoma and just more than half of all resections for clinical stage IIIA-N2 disease are preceded by neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiation. This study does not support concerns over excessive operative risk of induction therapy.

Risk factor analysis for postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome and early mortality after pneumonectomy: The predictive value of preoperative lung perfusion distribution

This study aims to establish the preoperative risk factors in the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and early mortality after pneumonectomy for lung cancer and to examine the influence of reduced pulmonary perfusion on outcomes. Between 1994 and 2009, of 425 patients who underwent simple pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer, 164 who were preoperatively evaluated with lung perfusion scanning formed the population of this study. Of 30 (18.3%) patients who had major pulmonary complications, 17 (10.4%) progressed to ARDS, 15 of whom subsequently died. On multivariable logistic regression analyses, lower predicted postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppo-FEV(1); relative risk of 0.93 [P = .020] for ARDS and 0.94 [P = .027] for mortality) and greater perfusion fraction of resected lung (relative risk of 1.10 [P = .003] for ARDS and 1.09 [P = .002] for mortality) were found to be independent factors associated with ARDS and early mortality. With a cut-off value of 35% for perfusion fraction of resected lung, patients with a perfusion fraction of greater than 35% had a greater incidence of ARDS (17.3% vs 3.3%, P = .005) and early mortality (19.8% vs 6.0%, P = .010) than those with a perfusion fraction of 35% or less. Patients with a low ppo-FEV(1), a high perfusion fraction of resected lung, or both had a higher incidence of ARDS and early mortality after pneumonectomy. Therefore, although the ppo-FEV(1) appears to be within an acceptable limit for pneumonectomy, much attention should be given to patients with a high perfusion fraction of resected lung.

Risk Factors for Post-pneumonectomy Acute Lung Injury/Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Primary Lung Cancer Patients

Acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI / ARDS) is the most serious pulmonary complication after lung resection. This study investigated the incidence and outcome of patients with ALI / ARDS who required mechanical ventilation within one week of undergoing pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer and analysed the risk factors. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 146 patients who underwent pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer between May 2001 and April 2006. Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative clinical data were analysed. Post-pneumonectomy ALI / ARDS developed within the first postoperative week in 18 (12%) patients. Patients who developed ALI / ARDS had a longer hospital duration of stay (median [interquartile range], 26 [18 to 75] vs. 8 [7 to 11] days; P < 0.001) and higher in-hospital mortality (12 [67%] vs. 0 [0%]; P < 0.001). In an univariate analysis, post-pneumonectomy ALI / ARDS was associated with larger tidal volume (V(T)) and higher airway pressure (P(aw)) during one-lung ventilation (V(T) 8.2 [7.5 to 9.0] vs. 7.7 [6.9 to 8.2] ml/kg predicted body weight, P = 0.016; P(aw), 28.9 [27.6 to 30.0] vs. 27.2 [25.6 to 28.5] cmH2O, P = 0.001). V(T) during two-lung ventilation was also greater in patients who developed ALI / ARDS (P = 0.014) than in those who did not, but P(aw) during two-lung ventilation did not differ (P = 0.950). In a multiple logistic regression analysis, post-pneumonectomy ALI / ARDS was independently associated with a larger V(T) (OR 3.37 per 1 ml/kg predicted body weight increase; 95% confidence interval 1.65 to 6.86) and higher P(aw) (OR 2.32 per 1 cmH2O increase; 95% confidence interval 1.46 to 3.67) during the period of one-lung ventilation. In conclusion, a large V(T) and high P(aw) during one-lung ventilation were associated with an increased risk of post-pneumonectomy ALI / ARDS in primary lung cancer patients.

P-888 Evaluation of 130 pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer

P-888 Evaluation of 130 pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer

Bronchopleural fistula after pneumonectomy.

Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) is an infrequent but life-threatening complication after lung resection. The incidence of BPF reported in the literature varies between 0 and 15%. To evaluate the incidence of BPF after pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer in a single practice using a single technique. Hospital records of patients who underwent pneumonectomy from 1 January 1988 to 1 October 1998 were reviewed retrospectively. The bronchial stump was closed using a uniform hand suture technique. There was a total of 157 patients, including 118 males and 39 females with a mean age of 64 years (range 37-78). Sixty-two patients (39.5%) had a right pneumonectomy. Three patients developed BPF (1.9%). All occurred within seven days of the operation. Two of the three patients died. Ventilation for more than 24 hours was found to be the only significant risk factor for the development of BPF (p < 0.001). Hand suture closure of bronchial stump after pneumonectomy is a safe, reproducible and inexpensive technique, and a low incidence of BPF can be achieved.

肺癌に対する肺摘除術の合併症及び手術成績に関する検討

肺癌に対する肺摘除術の合併症及び手術成績に関する検討

Pulmonary resection and contralateral anomalous venous drainage: A lethal combination

A 72-year-old acyanotic woman had development of acute right heart failure with systemic hypotension 2 hours after a curative right intrapericardial pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer. A postoperative pulmonary angiogram revealed a major left to right shunt through previously unsuspected partial anomalous venous drainage of the left upper lobe of the lung.

Thoracic surgery with pedicled omental graft

Pedicled omental grafts were used successfully in 2 cases. A 66-year-old male who had had a left pneumonectomy for primary lung cancer 13 months earlier suffered from cough and dyspnea. A bronchopleural fistula was found on bronchoscopy. A pedicled omental graft was placed in the pleural cavity through a retrosternal route and fixed over the bronchopleural fistula. He is asymptomatic 8 months after the operation.A 59-year-old female had a right upper and middle lobectomy combined with resection of the chest wall for primary lung cancer. Reconstruction of the chest wall was performed with Marlex mesh as the prosthetic material. A pedicled omental graft was placed on the Marlex mesh through a percutaneous route and covered with a fullthickness skin graft. She is doing well 7 months after the operation.