Abacavir, an HIV nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor, can cause hypersensitivity reactions in 3–5% of patients started on the drug, and 90% of cases occur within the first 6 weeks after initiation (median time 11 days). The most common symptoms of abacavir hypersensitivity are fever, rash, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Respiratory symptoms such as dyspnea, cough, and pharyngitis are prominent in 30% of cases and mimic pneumonia [1]. Characteristically, symptoms appear suddenly and worsen over just a few days when the use of abacavir is continued. Very rarely hypotension, renal insufficiency, and bronchoconstriction have resulted in death, especially after the rechallenge of the drug. If the use of abacavir is discontinued in time to prevent the development of hypotension, the hypersensitivity reaction resolves completely in a few days [2]. Herring and Krieger [3] recently reported a patient with fulminant pneumonitis leading to acute respiratory syndrome (ARDS) after 11 days of therapy with abacavir. ARDS resolved within 3 days after the discontinuation of abacavir. The lung tissue was not available in that report. A 52-year-old woman infected with HIV (CD4 cell count 231 cells/μl) presented to our institution with a worsening of dyspnea and productive cough for a day. She had been diagnosed 4 years earlier, and antiretroviral therapy (ART) had been started 2 weeks before she presented. Her ART regimen consisted of abacavir, lamivudine, and ritonavir boosted with atazanavir. Examination revealed bilateral expiratory wheezes. Partial pressure of oxygen in the blood was 49 mmHg and the alveolar–artery oxygen gradient was elevated at 63. Chest radiograph showed diffuse reticular interstitial infiltrates. As Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia and atypical pneumonia were considered most likely, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, azithromycin, and corticosteroids were started. Dyspnea and hypoxia and bilateral infiltrates worsened progressively, in spite of treatment. On day 4, ART was discontinued as immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome was considered to be the cause of the worsening. On day 5, she was intubated and bronchoscopy was performed. Cytology of bronchoalveolar lavage did not reveal Pneumocystis cysts. Over the course of the next few days, there was a remarkable improvement in the condition of the patient, with dramatic resolution of the diffuse bilateral infiltrates (Fig. 1a–c). Thoracoscopic lung biopsy performed on day 10 revealed patchy areas of organizing pneumonia with fibrin balls within alveolar spaces, which was compatible with acute fibrinous and organizing pneumonia (AFOP; Fig. 1d, e).Fig. 1: Chest radiographs. (a) On admission; (b) day 5: intubation; (c) day 10: lung biopsy of left lower lobe; (d) organizing pneumonia; (e) fibrin ball.AFOP was first described by Beasley et al. [4] in 2002, as a new pattern of lung injury, showing prominent intra-alveolar fibrin deposition (fibrin balls) and organizing pneumonia. The absence of hyaline membrane, eosinophils, and granulomatous inflammation are important features that differentiate it from diffuse alveolar damage, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, eosinophilic pneumonia, and cryptogenic organizing pneumonia, which was previously known as bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia. AFOP appears to have two distinct patterns of disease progression and outcome. Fulminant AFOP rapidly progresses to death. In contrast, subacute AFOP resembles cryptogenic organizing pneumonia (bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia) and recovers without mechanical ventilation. Beasley et al. [4] noted several conditions associated with AFOP, including collagen-vascular disease, zoological work, coal mining, construction work, hairspray exposure, high-grade lymphoma, altered immune status, the use of amiodarone, and infections caused by Haemophilus influenzae and Acinetobacter baumannii. After the original report by Beasley et al. [4], reports of AFOP in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), juvenile dermatomyositis, and acute lymphoblastic leukemia have been described [5–7]. Our patient represents the first case of AFOP occurring as a hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir. From our observation, abacavir can cause acute lung injury clinically presenting as ARDS, presumed to be a hypersensitivity reaction and pathologically showing AFOP. The early recognition and discontinuation of the drug is the only established treatment. None of the patients with fulminant AFOP recovered in the previous studies, but AFOP secondary to abacavir hypersensitivity was reversible in our patient. This highlights the characteristic of abacavir hypersensitivity: fulminant exacerbation with continuation of the drug and rapid recovery after discontinuation of the drug. If respiratory symptoms worsen progressively within a few weeks after the initiation of ART, the differential diagnosis includes new infection, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome, and drug-induced hypersensitivity. The only way to differentiate this is by lung biopsy, as in our case. Conflicts of interest: None.
Read full abstract