Pleural Cryobiopsy Research Articles

Comparison between thoracoscopic pleural cryobiopsy and conventional forceps biopsy in diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion: Assiut University experience

Abstract Context Exudative pleural effusion is a diagnostic dilemma that includes many steps; one of them is obtaining a definite diagnosis through pleural biopsy. Cryoprobes are being increasingly used for obtaining larger specimens with fewer crush artifacts. However, the safety and feasibility of cryoprobe biopsy compared with standard forceps for pleural biopsy have not been fully assessed. Aims To evaluate the diagnostic value, size, and quality of the specimens obtained by flexible cryoprobe in comparison with those obtained by flexible forceps probe during medical thoracoscopy in patients with exudative pleural effusion and to assess the possible complications from the procedure. Settings and design This interventional prospective study was carried out at the endoscopy unit at Chest Department and Tuberculosis Assiut University Hospital. Patients and methods This study included 60 patients with undiagnosed exudative pleural effusion. Medical thoracoscopy was carried out for all the patients, and pleural biopsies were taken from the parietal pleura using a conventional rigid forceps probe and flexible cryoprobe in the same settings. Results Cryoprobe biopsy established a definite diagnosis in 55/60, with 91.6% diagnostic yield, whereas forceps biopsy had a definite diagnosis in 53/60, with 88.3% diagnostic yield. The size of cryoprobe biopsy was significantly larger in comparison with the forceps biopsy (26.56 ± 22.16 vs. 17.38 ± 12.08 mm2; P<0.001). The depth of pleural biopsy was evaluated by the presence of extrapleural fat cells, which were significantly higher in cryoprobe biopsy in comparison with forceps biopsy [21 (35%) vs. 11 (18.3%); P=0.03]. There were no significant complications or procedure-related deaths. Conclusions Cryobiopsy is a possible safe and effective alternative to conventional forceps probe biopsy in the diagnosis of exudative pleural effusion with a larger, deeper, and less number of biopsies. It was also found that cryoprobe biopsy had a better diagnostic yield, sensitivity, and accuracy.

局所麻酔下胸腔鏡におけるクライオ生検で診断した胸部SMARCA4欠損未分化腫瘍の1例

局所麻酔下胸腔鏡におけるクライオ生検で診断した胸部SMARCA4欠損未分化腫瘍の1例

Diagnostic Yield and Safety of Pleural Cryobiopsy during Medical Thoracoscopy to Diagnose Pleural Effusion. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

ObjectiveCurrent evidence on the diagnostic yield and safety of pleural cryobiopsy (CB) is based on a series of heterogeneous studies with limited cohorts. A pooled analysis of these studies could improve the evidence and contribute to a better understanding of this new technique. MethodologyWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies that included data on the yield and diagnostic safety of pleural CB compared with procedures performed using conventional flexible forceps. The heterogeneity of the analysis was evaluated by determining the I2 index, while study quality was measured with the QUADAS-2 tool. ResultsSeven studies involving 356 patients were used for the final evaluation. In 55.6%, the etiology of the pleural effusion was malignant, 61.1% of which were lung cancer. The diagnostic yield of pleural CB was 95% (95% CI 92-97) vs. 91% (95% CI 87-94) with conventional flexible forceps (P = .019). Mild bleeding was reported in 67% of CB procedures (95% CI 62-72) compared with 85% of conventional flexible forceps procedures (95% CI 79-90) (P < .001). CB specimens were larger, and fewer artifacts were detected. A pooled analysis of the detection of molecular changes could not be performed. Heterogeneity was moderate to high, although the quality of the studies was acceptable. ConclusionsPleural CB is a safe technique with a high yield for etiological diagnosis of pleural effusion, and larger specimens with fewer artifacts are obtained. Molecular determinations should be investigated in more depth.

Rentabilidad diagnóstica y seguridad de la criobiopsia pleural durante la toracoscopia médica en el estudio del derrame pleural. Una revisión sistemática y metaanálisis

ObjectiveCurrent evidence on the diagnostic yield and safety of pleural cryobiopsy (CB) is based on a series of heterogeneous studies with limited cohorts. A pooled analysis of these studies could improve the evidence and contribute to a better understanding of this new technique. MethodologyWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies that included data on the yield and diagnostic safety of pleural CB compared with procedures performed using conventional flexible forceps. The heterogeneity of the analysis was evaluated by determining the I2 index, while study quality was measured with the QUADAS-2 tool. ResultsSeven studies involving 356 patients were used for the final evaluation. In 55.6%, the etiology of the pleural effusion was malignant, 61.1% of which were lung cancer. The diagnostic yield of pleural CB was 95% (95% CI 92-97) vs. 91% (95% CI 87-94) with conventional flexible forceps (P=.019). Mild bleeding was reported in 67% of CB procedures (95% CI 62-72) compared with 85% of conventional flexible forceps procedures (95% CI 79-90) (P<.001). CB specimens were larger, and fewer artifacts were detected. A pooled analysis of the detection of molecular changes could not be performed. Heterogeneity was moderate to high, although the quality of the studies was acceptable. ConclusionsPleural CB is a safe technique with a high yield for etiological diagnosis of pleural effusion, and larger specimens with fewer artifacts are obtained. Molecular determinations should be investigated in more depth.

Pleural Cryobiopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Pleural biopsy using either video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery or medical pleuroscopy is the current diagnostic criterion standard for pleural pathology with a high, yet imperfect, diagnostic yield. Cryobiopsy may provide greater tissue, increase depth of sampled tissue, and/or reduce crush artifact. However, its impact on diagnostic yield remains uncertain, and there are potential concerns regarding its safety too. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the same. We performed a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar for studies evaluating the performance of pleural cryobiopsy, assessing the quality of each study using the Quality Assessment, Data Abstraction and Synthesis-2 tool. Using inverse variance weighting, we performed a meta-analysis of diagnostic yield estimations. We also reviewed specimen characteristics and complications related to the procedure. Seven observational studies involving 586 pleural biopsies (311 cryobiopsies and 275 flexible forceps biopsies) were evaluated. All but one study used a semi-rigid thoracoscope. Meta-analysis generated a diagnostic yield of 96.5%for cryobiopsy and 93.1%for forceps biopsy with an inverse variance-weighted OR of 1.61 (95%CI, 0.71-3.66) and an I2 of 16%. No instances of moderate to severe bleeding were reported with cryobiopsy. A funnel plot illustrated no major publication bias. Based on analysis of relatively homogenous observational data, pleural cryobiopsy is safe but does not increase diagnostic yield over flexible forceps biopsy. Adequately powered multicenter randomized trials are needed for further investigation.

Pleural Cryobiopsy versus Flexible Forceps Biopsy in Subjects with Undiagnosed Exudative Pleural Effusions Undergoing Semirigid Thoracoscopy: A Crossover Randomized Trial (COFFEE Trial)

Background: There is no randomized study comparing pleural cryobiopsy (CB) and flexible forceps biopsy (FFB) in subjects undergoing medical thoracoscopy for the diagnosis of pleural effusions. Objective: In this crossover study, we compared the diagnostic yield of CB versus FFB in subjects undergoing semirigid thoracoscopy. Methods: Subjects undergoing semirigid thoracoscopy for undiagnosed pleural effusions were subjected to both CB and FFB, with the order of performing the biopsy randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was the diagnostic yield obtained with CB versus FFB. The secondary outcomes included the biopsy size, depth, histologic interpretability, artefacts, the difficulty of performing biopsy on an operator-rated visual analog scale, the severity of bleeding observed at the time of the biopsy, and the duration of the procedure. Results: Of the 201 subjects screened, 50 (mean age 52.4 years; 18 women) were included. The diagnostic yield of CB (78.0%) was not different from FFB (76.0%, p = 1.00). CB yielded a larger specimen than FFB (median size 7.0 vs. 4.0 mm; p < 0.001), and a greater depth of specimens (up to the pleural fat or deeper, CB vs. FFB 65.2 vs. 40.8%; p = 0.02). The CB procedure was quicker than FFB (median duration 10 vs. 15 min; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in the difficulty of performing the biopsy, the severity of bleeding, histologic interpretability, or artefacts in the specimens between the CB and FFB groups. Conclusion: The diagnostic yield of pleural CB was comparable to FFB during semirigid thoracoscopy.

Cryobiopsy during flex-rigid pleuroscopy: an emerging alternative biopsy method in malignant pleural mesothelioma. A comparative study of pathology.

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is rarely an asbestos-related cancer with a poor prognosis that is difficult to distinguish from some benign conditions by using conventional biopsy techniques. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a novel biopsy technique using a cryoprobe during flex-rigid pleuroscopy for diagnosing MPM. Consecutive patients who underwent pleural cryobiopsy during flex-rigid pleuroscopy from June through November 2017 to diagnose the cause of pleural effusion were collected. From these, cases ultimately diagnosed as MPM were selected. Pleural biopsies were performed by using conventional instruments followed by a cryoprobe. The obtained samples were histologically examined and compared with regard to the quality (sample size, tissue depth, and crush rate), immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, and p16 by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). In total, five patients ultimately diagnosed as MPM were enrolled. The sample collected was significantly larger for cryobiopsy than conventional biopsy (18.9 mm2 vs. 6.7 mm2, P < 0.001). Full-thickness biopsies were achieved in four cases by using cryobiopsy compared with one case by conventional biopsy. Moreover, the crush rate was significantly less for cryobiopsy than conventional biopsy (9% vs. 35%, P < 0.001). The results of IHC staining and p16 by FISH were similar between biopsy techniques. Cryobiopsy successfully led to accurate diagnosis of MPM in all cases, whereas conventional biopsy was diagnostic in one case. No severe complications developed after either biopsy technique. Cryobiopsy during flex-rigid pleuroscopy is a feasible and convenient biopsy technique that supports precise diagnosis of MPM.

A Case of Malignant Lymphoma Diagnosed Definitively by Pleural Cryobiopsy Under Medical Thoracoscopy

A Case of Malignant Lymphoma Diagnosed Definitively by Pleural Cryobiopsy Under Medical Thoracoscopy

Safety and Feasibility of Pleural Cryobiopsy Compared to Forceps Biopsy During Medical Pleuroscopy

Safety and Feasibility of Pleural Cryobiopsy Compared to Forceps Biopsy During Medical Pleuroscopy

Feasibility and safety of parietal pleural cryobiopsy during semi-rigid thoracoscopy.

Performing pleural biopsies during semi-rigid thoracoscopy is sometimes a difficult and time-consuming task because of the lack of mechanical power of dedicated flexible forceps in patients with thickened pleura. The purpose of this first ever pilot study was to test the feasibility of taking biopsy specimens by cryoprobe from the parietal pleura during semi-rigid thoracoscopy. Our aim was also to assess the diagnostic value and quality of specimens obtained, morphological features, feasibility of immunohistochemistry staining and possibility of DNA isolation. The secondary aim was to evaluate safety, tolerability and duration of the procedure. Fifteen patients with pleural effusion of unknown origin that underwent semi-rigid thoracoscopy were included. Biopsies were obtained using a flexible autoclavable cryoprobe 20416-032 (Erbokryo CA, ERBE, Tübingen, Germany) 2.4 mm in diameter and a semi-rigid autoclavable Olympus LTF-160 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) thoracoscope. Tissue samples were obtained from 14 patients (93.3%), three from each. Of the samples, 81% were easily interpretable and 19% were interpretable with some difficulty by the pathologist. The samples were of good quality, with the level of artifacts below 25%. The specimens were adequate for histological diagnosis, immunohistochemical staining and DNA isolation. There were no moderate or major bleeding problems after the biopsies; two patients experienced pain. The median duration of three cryobiopsies (per patient) was 4 min (range 3-6 min). Cryobiopsy during semi-rigid thoracoscopy appears worth to be evaluated in a larger prospective multicenter trial as our preliminary data were promising for efficacy and safety.