The presence of Pseudotriton montanus ssp. in Ohio was first reported by Walker (1933: 224), on the basis of specimens in the Ohio State Museum. Subsequently, Bishop (1941: 14) described Pseudotriton montanus diastictus from Carter County, Kentucky, and various West Virginia stations, and later extended the range of this race to include southern Ohio to the exclusion of other forms of P. montanus (1943: 386; map 45). As matters stand today, most workers follow Bishop in considering diastictus the only representative of I seudotriton montanus in Ohio. That the salamanders of southern Ohio do not fit readily into any arrangement predicated largely on specimens from adjacent areas is not surprising. The region is poorly represented in most herpetological collections, although it has been an increasingly fruitful source of novelties within the past fifteen years, yielding such unusual and important records as: the allotype and many paratypes of Plethodon ricbmondi (Netting and Mittleman, 1938), the type of Gyrinophilus porphyriticus inagnoscus (Mittleman, 1942), and the only known Ohio specimens of Plethodon wehrlei (Walker, 1933), Leiolopisma utnicolor (Stupka, 1933), and Scaphiopus h. holbrookii (Gier, 1945). This general region forms the northern and western range limit of many caudate genera and species, such as Gyrinophilus, Pseudotriton, Aneides aeneus, and Plethodon richmondi. These terminal populations are often perceptibly different from others within the range of their species, although they are not always recognizable taxonomically. Taxonomic treatments of groups including forms occurring in this region are likely not to be consonant with local conditions, unless specific attention has been given to specimens collected in southern Ohio. The status of Pseudotriton montanus ssp. is an excellent case in point. Our collecting experience in southern Ohio has produced many specimens of montanus thoroughly distinct from diastictus, at least as compared with large series of topotypic specimens from northern Kentucky, but we have seen and collected other specimens indistinguishable from diastictus. In an effort to determine the status of these Ohio specimens, we have reviewed the extant
Read full abstract