Platinum-based Doublet Research Articles

Algorithme thérapeutique des CBNPC sans mutation addictive

The development of immunotherapy in first-line therapy with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 has changed the first line treatment algorithm of advanced NSCLC. The anti-PD-(L)1 pembrolizumab, atezolizumab and cemiplimab clearly improve the overall survival in NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50 % of tumour cells), comparatively to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Combinations of anti-PD(L)-1 to platinum-based chemotherapy are superior to chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 level of expression. They represent the 1st line gold-standard when PD-L1 is expressed in less than 50 % of tumour cells and might reduce the risk of early disease progression in comparison with pembrolizumab when PD-L1 ≥ 50 %. The room for anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD(L)-1 combinations which are not available in France remains to be established. Second-line treatment is currently based on chemotherapy, with a platinum-based doublet for patients treated in first line by pembrolizumab alone, and standard second-line chemotherapy options for patients treated by chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations, i.e. docetaxel regardless of histology or pemetrexed for non-squamous cell carcinoma when not used in first line. Addition of an antiangiogenic agent to docetaxel only achieved a modest improvement of overall survival but neither nintedanib, nor docetaxel is available in France. Combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab is also an option. Immunotherapy still benefits only a minority of patients whose identification is imperfect, underscoring the need for new strategies based on ne< combination amplifying the anti-tumour immune response as well as understanding the mechanisms of resistance to treatment in order to improve these results.1877-1203/© 2024 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Response to platinum-based therapies in second-line after immunotherapy in advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer PD-L1 ≥50.

Platinum-based therapies for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have classically provided overall survival (OS) rates of six to nine months and objective response rates (ORRs) of 20-30%. Whether prior immunotherapy determines a different response to platinum is currently unknown. This study aimed to analyse the current response characteristics to platinum as a second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC (PD-L1 ≥50%) after first-line immunotherapy. This retrospective study was conducted at the University Hospital of Salamanca (CAUSA) between 2016 and 2023 with patients who had advanced NSCLC (PD-L1 ≥50%) treated with second-line platinum-based therapies after immunotherapy (without mutations in EGFR, ALK or ROS1 and with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤1 during the first- and second-line treatments). Survival and response correlation analyses (Kaplan-Meier and log rank tests in SPSS v. 25) were performed. Subsequently, the results were compared with historical cohorts (PubMed, COCHRANE, ScienceDirect, Embase, and the clinical trial registry) who had received platinum-based therapies for advanced NSCLC. Seventeen patients were analysed (11 male and 6 female). Their median age was 67 years (interquartile range, 50-77 years). Fifteen patients (88.2%) were smokers or former smokers. The patients' main histology was adenocarcinoma (9 patients, 52.9%). All first-line treatments applied pembrolizumab (median dose: 12 cycles). Second-line platinum-based therapy achieved OS of 25 months (95% CI: 7-45 months) and progression-free survival (PFS) of 6 months (95% CI: 2.5-95 months). The ORR was 47.1% [seven patients with a partial response (PR) and one patient with a complete response (CR)]. Of the patients with PRs or CRs, 75% were treated with platinum plus pemetrexed. The one-year survival rate was 58.8%. The historical OS for first-line platinum-based doublets is 7 to 12 months, with PFS of three to five months and an ORR of 17-30%. The current response to second-line platinum-based therapies for patients with advanced NSCLC after immunotherapy appears to achieve favourable response rates and be an optimal treatment after progression to immunotherapy. Prior immunotherapy appears to enhance these patients' platinum response, though future confirmatory studies are necessary.

Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in Advanced Primary Pulmonary Salivary Gland Tumors (PSGTs)

Primary pulmonary salivary gland tumors (PSGT) constitute a rare subtype of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Currently, no established treatment guidelines exist for advanced PSGT. The efficacy of platinum-based chemotherapy for PSGT within the context of NSCLC remains uncertain. Therefore, we retrospectively collected 37 PSGT patients who underwent first-line platinum-based chemotherapy from 2010 to 2023. Survival analysis, employing the Kaplan–Meier method, and group comparisons via the log rank test were conducted. Our results show that first-line platinum-based chemotherapy demonstrates favorable efficacy and manageable safety in advanced PSGT, with the combination of Paclitaxel + Platinum emerging as a preferred option.

Maintenance with mirvetuximab soravtansine plus bevacizumab vs bevacizumab in FRα-high platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

At first recurrence, platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer (PSOC) is frequently treated with platinum-based chemotherapy doublets plus bevacizumab, then single-agent bevacizumab. Most patients' disease progresses within a year after chemotherapy, emphasizing the need for novel strategies. Mirvetuximab soravtansine-gynx (MIRV), an antibody-drug conjugate, comprises a folate receptor alpha (FRα)-binding antibody and tubulin-targeting payload (maytansinoid DM4). In FRα-high PSOC, MIRV plusbevacizumab previously showed promising efficacy (objective response rate, 69% [95% CI: 41-89]; median progression-free survival, 13.3months [95% CI: 8.3-18.3]; median duration of response, 12.9months [95% CI: 6.5-15.7]) and safety. The Phase III randomized GLORIOSA trial will evaluate MIRV plusbevacizumab vs. bevacizumab alone as maintenance therapy in patients with FRα-high PSOC who did not have disease progression following second-line platinum-based doublet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab.Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05445778; GOG.org ID: GOG-3078; ENGOT.ESGO.org ID: ENGOT-ov76.

Treatment Outcomes in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancers: Single Institution Retrospective Analysis

Abstract Purpose Biliary tract cancers (BTCs), particularly gallbladder cancers (GBCs), are prevalent in India. Yet there are limited data on treatment outcomes. To bridge this gap, we performed an analysis of advanced BTC treatment outcomes at our institute, seeking to offer insights into real-world scenario. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective study comprising advanced BTC patients treated at our institute from January 2015 to March 2023. We assessed demographics, treatment approaches, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and associated toxicities. Results Of the 411 patients analyzed, the majority were GBC (67.3%, n = 277), while the rest were cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (32.6%, n = 134). The median age of study population was 56 years. Palliative chemotherapy was administered in 85% (n = 349) of all patients. Gemcitabine–cisplatin doublet was the most commonly used chemotherapy regimen (80.2%, n = 280). Platinum doublets yielded higher response rates compared with single-agent/nonplatinum chemotherapy (60 vs. 30%, n = 133). The median PFS was 4 months. The median OS was 8 months with platinum doublets and 5 months with single-agent/nonplatinum chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.60, 95% confidence interval: [CI] 0.43–0.84, p = 0.0001). OS was no different based on the type of platinum agent used. Patients receiving multiple lines of treatment lived longer compared with those who received single line only (14 vs. 6 months, respectively, HR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.28–0.45, p &lt; 0.0001). Significant prognostic factors for OS were treatment with chemotherapy, platinum doublets, platinum exposure in first line, and treatment beyond first line. Grade 3 or 4 adverse effects seen were anemia (13.9%, n = 36), vomiting (4.2%, n = 11), diarrhea (3.4%, n = 9), thrombocytopenia (3.4%, n = 9), and febrile neutropenia (3.1%, n = 8). Conclusion This analysis confirms that chemotherapy is beneficial for advanced BTC. Platinum-based doublets are more effective than single agents. There is no significant difference between cisplatin and oxaliplatin. Patients who received multiple lines of treatment had better OS.

Impact of DNA damage repair alterations on real-world response to therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer.

e15557 Background: Alterations in the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway genes contribute to tumor development. These alterations can be exploited by cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens that induce DNA damage. Platinum chemotherapy agents have been shown to be particularly effective in breast and ovarian cancer patients with alterations in the DDR pathway. However, the clinical impact of DDR alterations in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is still poorly understood. In this study, we utilize a large national database to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with mCRC and alterations in DDR pathway genes. Methods: We reviewed 5602 patients that received standard fluorouracil based first-line chemotherapy regimens for mCRC using the nationwide Flatiron Health EHR-derived de-identified database. Chemotherapy regimens were categorized as a platinum-based doublet (FOLFOX, CAPOX), irinotecan-based doublets (FOLFIRI), or triplet (FOLFOXIRI). Overall survival (OS) was summarized within groups via Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. OS was compared between groups in the context of univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models controlling for age, gender, DDR status, stage at diagnosis, ECOG, RAS/RAF status, MMR status, albumin and CEA at diagnosis. OS was defined as the time in months between date of first line therapy initiation to death. Results: DDR gene alterations were indentified in 35.7% (2001) patients.The most frequent mutations were in ATM (13.3%) and BRCA2 (8.3%). There was no significant difference in OS based on DDR mutation status. Within DDR altered patients, there was no difference in OS between those who received a platinum-based doublet, irinotecan-based doublet or triplet first-line therapy. Time to next treatment or death (TTNTD) was significantly improved with an irinotecan-containing doublet regimen and triplet regimen compared to a platinum-based doublet in a multivariable model (HR 0.79, p = 0.001 and HR 0.68, p = 0.002, respectively). There was no difference in OS in DDR-mutated patients that received an irinotecan-based regimen in the first line followed by an oxaliplatin-based regimen in the second line or the reverse sequence. When evaluating the impact of commonly co-mutated genes on survival we observed a worse OS in patients with a KRAS mutation in addition to a DDR mutation (HR 1.19, p = 0.045). An APC mutation was associated with an improved OS in the entire cohort, regardless of DDR status (HR 0.76, p &lt; 0.001). Conclusions: In this real-world population, approximately one third of patients with mCRC harbored an alteration in a DDR pathway gene. In these patients, TTNTD was greater with irinotecan-containing first line therapies (doublet or triplet). However, OS was similar regardless of which first-line chemotherapy was used.

Impact of immune checkpoint inhibitors on survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer in Japan: A real-world analysis.

Nivolumab was approved for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer in 2017 in Japan. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of nivolumab in a real-world clinical setting. This single-institutional retrospective study included patients with advanced gastric or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma and a history of first-line chemotherapy with platinum-based doublet or triplet regimens between 2010 and 2020. To assess the impact of nivolumab on survival, the patients were divided based on the year of nivolumab approval into a pre-2017 (2010-2016) group and a post-2017 (2017-2020) group. From a total of 1918 patients, 1093 were excluded. There were 533 patients in the pre-2017 group and 292 in the post-2017 group. Immune checkpoint inhibitors were used significantly more often in the post-2017 group than in the pre-2017 group (8.6% vs. 47.9%). Median overall survival was significantly longer in the post-2017 group (16.9 vs. 13.9 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.90; p < 0.01). The proportion of patients transitioning to third-line treatment was higher in the post-2017 group than in the pre-2017 group (56.3% vs. 43.8%, p < 0.01). Median survival outcomes following progression on second-line treatment were significantly longer in the post-2017 group (4.3 vs. 3.2 months; HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.86; p < 0.01). The proportion of patients transitioning to third-line treatment and survival outcomes following progression on second-line treatment have improved since the approval of nivolumab. This drug might help to prolong overall survival in real-world practice.

Stage I and II nonsmall cell lung cancer treatment options.

Chest radiography, computed tomography (CT) and positron emission tomography (PET)-CT are required for staging nonsmall cell lung cancers. Stage I cancers may be up to 4 cm in maximal diameter, with stage IA tumours being up to 3 cm and stage IB up to 4 cm. A lung cancer becomes stage II if the tumour is between 4 and ≤5 cm (stage IIA), or it spreads to ipsilateral peribronchial or hilar lymph nodes (stage IIB). Stage IA tumours should be surgically resected, ideally using minimally invasive methods. Lobectomy is usually performed, although some studies have shown good outcomes for sublobar resections. If surgery is not possible, stereotactic body radiotherapy is a good alternative. This involves delivering a few high-dose radiation treatments at very high precision. For stage IB to IIB disease, combinations of surgery, chemotherapy or immunotherapy and radiotherapy are used. There is evidence that neoadjuvant treatment (immunotherapy with nivolumab and chemotherapy for stage IB and II) optimises outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy with a platinum-based doublet (typically cisplatin+vinorelbine) should be offered for resected stage IIB tumours and considered for resected IIA tumours. Adjuvant pembrolizumab is used for stage IB-IIIA following resection and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy. Osimertinib may be used for resected stage IB to IIIA cancers which have relevant mutations (epidermal growth factor receptor exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) substitution). There are no fixed guidelines for follow-up, but most centres recommend 6-monthly CT scanning for the first 2-3 years after definitive treatment, followed by annual scans.

Clinicopathologic Features and Efficacy of Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: Real-World Experience

Introduction: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) accounts for 0.01% of all carcinomas, and 70% of patients have locally advanced disease with a poor prognosis. The mainstay therapy is chemoradiotherapy (CRT), and concurrent administration of platinum-based agents and irradiation provides high local control rates. However, induction (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy (ICT) prior to CRT is recommended for large tumors with a high tumor burden at the category 1 level. For ICT, platinum-based doublet or triplet combination regimens are recommended. Selected patients with a high tumor burden at the time of diagnosis who did not receive ICT before CRT were given adjuvant (consolidation) therapy after CRT. This multicenter study aimed to share our experience in treatment of NPC and evaluate the factors associated with survival. Methods: The study included patients diagnosed with NPC who were followed and treated between 2008 and 2022. Hundred and forty-two patients from 6 centers were evaluated. The factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: The median age of our patients was 51 years (IQR: 16–81 years), and the male:female ratio was 2.5:1. A majority of patients (71%) had stage 3–4 disease. They had locally advanced disease, and 48 patients (34%) received ICT. Twenty patients (14%) received adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up was 41 months (range, 2.7–175.1 months). The median DFS in NPC was 92.6 months (range, 71.9–113.3 months), with a 40th month DFS of 70.9%. The median OS was 113 months (range, 91–135 months), with a 40th month OS of 84.7%. Median DFS was 95.3 months (range, 64.2–126.4 months) in patients who received ICT before CRT, which was longer than in the CRT-only group (p = 0.6). DFS at the 40th month was 75.1% in patients treated with ICT compared to 65.1% in the CRT-only group. Median OS was 117 months (range, 92–142 months) in patients receiving ICT, which was longer than in the CRT-only group (p = 0.4). OS at the 40th month was 86.7% in patients receiving ICT but 83.6% in the CRT-only group. Conclusions: Both the objective response rate and survival were longer in patients who radiologically responded to CRT following ICT. Nonresponse to ICT is a negative predictive indicator. The role of ICT in locally advanced NPC is increasing.

Comparison of Clinicopathogenomic Features and Treatment Outcomes of EGFR and HER2 Exon 20 Insertion Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Single-Institution Experience.

Exon 20 insertion mutations (E20ins) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has become more important with emergence of novel agents targeting E20ins. Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC patients with E20ins were included. EGFR E20ins was identified by two methods, next-generation sequencing (NGS) or real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), while HER2 E20ins was done by NGS only. Between December 2013 and July 2021, E20ins were identified in 107 patients at Asan Medical Center; 67 EGFR E20ins and 40 HER2 E20ins. Out of 32 patients with EGFR E20ins who had tested both PCR and NGS, 17 were identified only through NGS and the other 15 through both tests, giving a discordance rate of 53.1%. There was no clinically significant difference in clinicopathologic features between EGFR and HER2 E20ins; both were observed more frequently in adenocarcinoma, female and never-smokers. Brain metastases were evident at diagnosis in 31.8% of EGFR E20ins and 27.5% of HER2 E20ins, respectively. Platinum-based doublets demonstrated objective response rates (ORR) of 13.3% with a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.2 months for EGFR E20ins and 35.3% with 4.7 months for HER2 E20ins, respectively. In contrast, novel EGFR E20ins-targeted agents exhibited an ORR of 46.2% with a median PFS of 5.4 months, while HER2-targeted agents showed an ORR of 50% with that of 7.0 months. Identification of EGFR and HER2 E20ins is more important as their targeted therapies improved outcomes. Upfront NGS test as a comprehensive molecular approach is strongly warranted.

Canakinumab in combination with docetaxel compared with docetaxel alone for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer following platinum-based doublet chemotherapy and immunotherapy (CANOPY-2): A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial

ObjectivesCanakinumab, an interleukin-1 beta inhibitor, previously showed reduced lung cancer incidence and mortality (CANTOS). Here, we compare the efficacy/safety of canakinumab versus placebo in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had progressed after platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (PDC) and immunotherapy. Materials and methodsCANOPY-2, a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, enrolled adult patients with stage IIIB/IV NSCLC, without EGFR or ALK alterations, who had received one prior PDC regimen and one prior programmed death-1/programmed death-ligand 1 inhibitor and experienced subsequent disease progression. Patients were randomized to canakinumab plus docetaxel or placebo plus docetaxel. ResultsA total of 237 patients were randomly allocated: 120 (51 %) to canakinumab and 117 (49 %) to placebo, stratified by histology and prior lines of therapy. Three patients in the placebo arm did not receive study treatment. The trial did not meet its primary endpoint of overall survival: median 10.6 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 8.2–12.4) for the canakinumab arm and 11.3 months (95 % CI, 8.5–13.8) for the placebo arm (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95 % CI, 0.76–1.48]; one-sided P-value = 0.633). AEs (any grade) were reported in 95 % of patients in the canakinumab group and in 98 % of patients in the placebo group. Grade 3–4 AEs were experienced by 62 % and 64 % of patients in the canakinumab and placebo groups, respectively, and grade 5 AEs were experienced by 8 % and 5 %. Prespecified, post-hoc subgroup analyses showed that patients with undetected circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and/or lower levels (< 10 mg/L) of C-reactive protein (CRP) achieved longer progression-free and overall survival than those with detected ctDNA or higher (≥ 10 mg/L) CRP levels. There was no association with treatment arm. ConclusionAdding canakinumab to docetaxel did not provide additional benefit for patients with advanced NSCLC who had progressed after PDC and immunotherapy.Clinical registration: NCT03626545.

Pd-L1 Evaluation in Serum and Tumoral Circulating Extracellular Vescicles in Locally Advanced Nsclc After Concomitant Chemoradiation: A Surrogate of Tumor Microenviroment Change from Cold Tumor to Hot Tumor

Background: Pacific trial has revolutioned the outcome and the approach in locally advanced (LA) unresectable Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC). In 2018 the European Medicine Agency (EMA) approved the use of Durvalumab only in adults whose tumours on biopsy specimen expresses PD-L1 on ≥ 1% of tumour cells despite this cut-off was not provided by the original randomised study. In vitro and in vivo studies have recorded the up regulation of PD-L1 expression in the tumor microenviroment (TME) after chemoradiation regrdless the expression on biopsy. Liquid biopsy could be helpful in detection of circulating PD-L1 in this set. Aim of this observational multicentre prospective study is to assess on liquid biopsy the up-regulation of PD-L1on serum and tumoral circulating extracellular vescicles (cEVS) from patients with LA NSCLC not expressing the PD-L1 on biopsy and treated with concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT). Methods: Locally advanced NSCLC PD-L1 &lt; 1 % biopsy proven will be enrolled in this study. A blood sample will be taken the day before (T0), 14 days after CCRT (T1) and 1 months later (T2). Patients will be treated with CCRT with platinum-based doublet and 60-66 Gy total radiation dose. Soluble PD-L1 will be analysed by ELISA. PD-L1on cEVs will be isolated from serum and phenotyped by nanoparticle tracking analysis, microscopy and flow cytometry. The statistical significant improvement in PD-L1 expression in serum and cEVs at T0 -T1-T2 will be assessed by t-test for p= 0.05; for multiple test p-value will be corrected with FDR.

Real-World Treatment Outcomes and Safety of Afatinib in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Progressed after Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy (SPACE Study)

Real-World Treatment Outcomes and Safety of Afatinib in Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer Progressed after Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy and Immunotherapy (SPACE Study)

Characterization of 164 patients with NRAS mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

BackgroundNRAS mutations are observed in less than 1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical data regarding this rare subset of lung cancer are scarce and response to systemic treatment such as chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has never been reported. MethodsAll consecutive patients with an NRAS mutated NSCLC, diagnosed between August 2014 and November 2020 in 14 French centers, were included. Clinical and molecular data were collected and reviewed from medical records. ResultsOut of the 164 included patients, 106 (64.6%) were men, 150 (91.5%) were current or former smokers, and 104 (63.4%) had stage IV NSCLC at diagnosis. The median age was 62 years, and the most frequent histology was adenocarcinoma (81.7%). NRAS activating mutations were mostly found in codon 61 (70%), while codon 12 and 13 alterations were observed in 16.5% and 4.9% of patients, respectively. Programmed death ligand-1 expression level <1%/1–49%/≥50% were respectively found in 30.8%/27.1%/42.1% of tumors. With a median follow-up of 12.5 months, median overall survival (OS) of stage IV patients was 15.3 months (95% CI 9.9–27.6). No significant difference in OS was found according to the type of mutation (codon 61 vs. other), HR = 1.12 (95% CI 0.65–1.95). Among stage IV patients treated with platinum-based doublet (n = 66), ICI (n = 48), or combination of both (n = 10), objective response rate, and median progression free survival were respectively 45% and 5.8 months, 35% and 6.9 months, 70% and 8.6 months. ConclusionNRAS mutated NSCLC are characterized by a high frequency of smoking history and codon 61 mutations. Further studies are needed to confirm the encouraging outcome of immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy.

Algorithme thérapeutique des CBNPC sans mutation addictive: Algorithm of NSCLC management outside oncogenic addiction

The development of immunotherapy in first-line therapy with anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 has changed the first line treatment algorithm of advanced NSCLC. The anti-PD-(L)1 pembrolizumab, atézolizumab and cemiplimab clearly improve the overall survival in NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression (≥ 50% of tumour cells), comparatively to cytotoxic chemotherapy. Combinations of anti-PD(L)-1 to platinum-based chemotherapy are superior to chemotherapy alone, regardless of PD-L1 level of expression. They represent the 1st line gold-standard when PD-L1 is expressed in less than 50 % of tumour cells and might reduce the risk of early disease progression in comparison with pembrolizumab when PD-L1 ≥ 50%. The room for anti-CTLA-4 + anti-PD(L)-1 combinations which are not available in France remains to be established. Second-line treatment is currently based on chemotherapy, with a platinum-based doublet for patients treated in first line by pembrolizumab alone, and standard second-line chemotherapy options for patients treated by chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations, i.e. docétaxel regardless of histology or pemetrexed for non-squamous cell carcinoma when not used in first line. Addition of an antiangiogenic agent to docetaxel only achieved a modest improvement of overall survival but neither nintedanib, nor docetaxel is available in France. Combination of paclitaxel and bevacizumab is also an option. Immunotherapy still benefits only a minority of patients whose identification is imperfect, underscoring the need for new strategies based on ne‹ combination amplifying the anti-tumour immune response as well as understanding the mechanisms of resistance to treatment in order to improve these results. Supportive care remains crucial for all patients from the time of diagnosis.1877-1203/© 2023 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Les CBNPC de stades avancés hors addiction oncogénique : les traitements systémiques de deuxième ligne: Advanced stage NSCLC excluding oncogenic addiction: second-line systemic treatments

The emergence of immunotherapy as the cornerstone of first line therapy in advanced stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), without oncogenic driver, has led to change the treatment algorithm of second line, which was previously and mainly based on anti-PD(L)-1 given as a single agent. Second-line treatment is currently based on chemotherapy, with a platinumbased doublet for patients treated in first line by pembrolizumab alone, and standard second-line chemotherapy options for patients treated by chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations, i.e. docétaxel regardless of histology or pemetrexed for non-squamous cell carcinoma when not used in first line. Addition of an antiangiogenic agent to taxane only achieved a modest improvement of overall survival. The future of second line treatment would require a better knowledge and understanding of resistance mechanisms to anti-PD(L)-1, and randomized phase III clinical trials, in order to optimize therapeutic options, including or not a rechallenge to an immunotherapy, targeting to restore anti-tumour immune response. Antibody drug-conjugate seem to be also a promising approach in this setting.1877-1203/© 2023 SPLF. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Avelumab Versus Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Patients With High-Expression Programmed Death-Ligand 1–Positive Metastatic NSCLC: Primary Analysis From the Phase 3 JAVELIN Lung 100 Trial

IntroductionWe report the primary analysis from JAVELIN Lung 100, a phase 3 trial comparing avelumab (anti⁠–programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy as first-line treatment for PD-L1–positive (+) advanced NSCLC. MethodsAdults with PD-L1+ (≥1% of tumor cells; PD-L1 immunohistochemistry 73-10 pharmDx), EGFR and ALK wild-type, previously untreated, stage IV NSCLC were randomized to avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (Q2W), avelumab 10 mg/kg once weekly (QW) for 12 weeks and Q2W thereafter, or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy every 3 weeks. Primary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review committee. The primary analysis population was patients with high-expression PD-L1+ tumors (≥80% of tumor cells). ResultsA total of 1214 patients were randomized to avelumab Q2W (n = 366), avelumab QW (n = 322), or chemotherapy (n = 526). In the primary analysis population, hazard ratios (HRs) for OS and PFS with avelumab Q2W (n = 151) versus chemotherapy (n = 216) were 0.85 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.67–1.09; one-sided p = 0.1032; median OS, 20.1 versus 14.9 mo) and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.54–0.93; one-sided p = 0.0070; median PFS, 8.4 versus 5.6 mo), respectively. With avelumab QW (n = 130) versus chemotherapy (n = 129), HRs were 0.79 (95% CI: 0.59–1.07; one-sided p = 0.0630; median OS, 19.3 versus 15.3 mo) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.52–0.98; one-sided p = 0.0196; median PFS, 7.5 versus 5.6 mo), respectively. No new safety signals were observed. ConclusionsLonger median OS and PFS were observed with avelumab versus platinum-based doublet chemotherapy in advanced NSCLC, but differences in OS and PFS were not statistically significant, and the trial did not meet its primary objective. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02576574.

Treatment of Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Pembrolizumab in Combination with Platinum-Based Doublet Chemotherapy in Vietnam.

Lung cancer has been one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide in recent decades. According to the findings of the KEYNOTE-407 (2018) study on patients with stage IV squamous cell lung cancer, the combination of pembrolizumab and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment prolongs overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and side effects of treating patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer with pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. A retrospective multicenter study on 46 patients at four hospitals in Vietnam between June 2018 and August 2022. Patients received first-line treatment with a protocol of pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (pemetrexed plus carboplatin or paclitaxel plus carboplatin). The study's primary endpoints were progression-free survival and safety. The secondary endpoint was overall survival. The median progression-free survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 7.4-14.7 months). The median overall survival was 23.1 months (95% CI, 18.4-27.8 months). The survival rate of patients after 1 and 2 years was 82.3% and 43.3%, respectively. The most common side effects were anemia and elevated liver enzymes, but they were primarily mild or moderate severity. Progression-free survival did not depend on cancer type based on histology (p = 0.13). The progression-free survival was independent of programmed death ligand-1 expression levels < 50% or ≥ 50% (p = 0.68). Treatment of stage IV non-small cell lung cancer without EGFR and ALK gene mutations with the immunotherapy protocol of pembrolizumab in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy resulted in favorable outcomes without any new safety concerns. A larger sample size and longer follow-up in the future are necessary to yield more complete results.

Phase 2 trial of epidermal growth factor (EGF) vaccine CIMAvax in combination with pembrolizumab in first line and maintenance setting in advanced non–small cell lung cancer patients.

TPS2677 Background: CIMAvax-EGF is a novel growth-factor depleting immunotherapy consisting of human recombinant EGF conjugated to recombinant P64k derived from Neisseria meningitidis, that elicits an anti-EGF antibody response, resulting in reduction of circulating EGF levels. A randomized phase 3 study of CIMAvax-EGF administered as switch maintenance therapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC demonstrated overall survival (OS) advantage in comparison to best supportive care alone, particularly in patients with high baseline serum EGF levels. A phase 1 trial combining CIMAvax-EGF with nivolumab, an anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, showed that the combination is safe and appears to induce higher rate of good anti-EGF antibody response within the first 8 weeks of therapy compared to historical comparison group receiving CIMAvax-EGF alone. CIMAvax-EGF is currently being investigated in combination with pembrolizumab in a multi-arm phase II trial as 1L therapy in combination with pembrolizumab for patients with EGFR/ALK wildtype NSCLC and PD-L1 &gt; 50% (Cohort C) and as maintenance therapy after completing 1L chemoimmunotherapy for patients with PD-L1 &lt; 50% (Cohorts D and E). Accrual to this trial is ongoing (NCT02955290). Methods: This is an open-label, non-randomized, multi-site, phase 2 basket trial. CIMAvax-EGF (2.4 mg IM every 2 weeks x 4 doses, then every 4 weeks thereafter) is being tested as first-line therapy in combination with pembrolizumab (200 mg IV every 4 weeks) in patients with advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 ≥ 50% (Cohort C), using a Simon two stage design (n up to 41). A safety lead-in consisting of the first 6 NSCLC patients was completed. There were no G3 or higher adverse events attributed to the combination within the first 4 weeks of protocol treatment. Patients with advanced squamous NSCLC (Cohort D, n=50) and non-squamous NSCLC (without EGFR/ALK/ROS-1/KRAS mutations; Cohort E, n=45) with PD-L1 expression &lt;50% and no evidence of progression of disease by RECIST 1.1 criteria after at least 4 cycles of induction platinum-based doublet with pembrolizumab, prior to initiation of standard of care maintenance therapy will be enrolled to receive protocol treatment with pembrolizumab in combination with CIMAvax-EGF as maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint is to evaluate objective response rate (Cohort C), and 12-month PFS in Cohorts D and E. Secondary endpoints include 12-month overall survival in all cohorts. Exploratory objectives include characterizing tissue-based immune and EGFR signaling profile as well as serum EGF levels, anti-EGF antibody levels and other blood-based biomarkers in relation to clinical outcomes. Clinical trial information: NCT02955290 .

SHR-1701 in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy and BP102 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer: Data from a phase 1b/3 study.

5529 Background: Platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) ± bevacizumab is the standard first-line therapy for cervical cancer, regardless of PD-L1 expression. SHR-1701 is a novel bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGF-βRII, and shows promising efficacy and controllable safety in pretreated patients (pts) with cervical cancer. This ongoing phase 1b/3 study aims to assess the addition of SHR-1701 to standard first-line therapy. Methods: In the phase 1b part, eligible pts had persistent, recurrent, or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cell carcinoma of the cervix not previously treated with systemic chemo for recurrence or metastasis and not amenable to curative treatment. Prior chemo-radiotherapy was permitted for recurrence, if mono-chemo was used as sensitizer. Pts were given SHR-1701 (30 mg/kg), paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), cisplatin (50 mg/m2) / carboplatin (AUC 5), and BP102 (15 mg/kg) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were safety and ORR. Results: From Feb 26 to Aug 12, 2022, 31 pts were enrolled. Median age was 55 years (range, 27-71). 24 (77.4%) had squamous-cell carcinoma, and 7 (22.6%) had adenocarcinoma. 20 (64.5%) had metastatic disease, 7 (22.6%) had recurrent cervical cancer, and 4 (12.9%) had persistent cervical cancer. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 25 (80.6%) pts, with the most common being decreased neutrophil count (n=16, 51.6%), decreased white blood cell count (n=12, 38.7%), and anemia (n=8, 25.8%). TRAEs led to discontinuation of any study agent in 8 (25.8%) pts; of note, only 2 (6.5%) pts discontinued SHR-1701 due to TRAEs (grade 3 infusion reaction and grade 3 immune-mediated rash). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Efficacy outcomes are summarized in Table. ORR was 77.4%, with 4 CRs and 20 PRs; responses were ongoing in all 24 responders. DCR was 93.5%. Shrinkage in target lesions was observed in 30 (96.8%) pts. PFS rate at 6 months reached 93.5%. Conclusions: SHR-1701 plus platinum-based doublet chemo and BP102 provided a manageable safety profile and potent antitumor activity in pts with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer, supporting the subsequent randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 part. Clinical trial information: NCT05179239 . [Table: see text]