Plasmakinetic Resection Research Articles

Prostate-specific antigen, androgen, progesterone and oestrogen receptors in Benign prostatic hyperplasia: human tissues and animal model study

Background Direct evidence for the relationship between a large prostate (≥80 ml) and androgen receptor/PSA signal remains lacking in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim is to identify whether the cause of a large prostate is related to progesterone receptor (PGR) androgen receptor (AR), oestrogen receptor α, β (ERα,β) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA). Materials and methods Surgical specimens of BPH in plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) with three groups of different prostate-sizes with mean volumes of 25.97 ml, 63.80 ml, and 122.37 ml were collected for immunohistochemical analysis of the tissue microarray with PGR, AR, PSA and ERs. Rats were castrated and treated with testosterone replacement to explore androgen and PGR, AR and ERs expression levels in the prostate. Quantitative real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (Rt-PCR) for mRNA detection of above genes was conducted. Results Immunoblotting, Rt-PCR and immunohistochemistry assays showed that PGR, PSA, AR, ERα expression levels were positively correlated with prostate size and that ERβ expression levels were negatively correlated with prostate volume. Animal experiments have shown that prostate volume is decreased in castrated rats with decreased PGR, AR, ERα and increased ERβ expression levels. Conclusion PGR, AR, ERs signals can be regarded as important factors for large-sized prostates in BPH patients (≥100 ml).

Effect of Oral Gabapentin before Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate on Anesthesia Effects in Older Adults with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Retrospective Study.

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common chronic disease affecting the health of the urinary system and the quality of life in older adults. Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) is one of the important surgical procedures for treating BPH; However, older adults may experience anesthesia complications and postoperative pain. This retrospective study aimed to assess the effects of preoperative oral gabapentin on anesthesia outcomes in older adults with BPH undergoing PKRP and to provide detailed clinical evidence for improving the impact of surgical treatment. The medical records of 178 older adults with BPH who underwent PKRP in Tianjin Hospital from March 2021 to March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. After excluding 18 patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria, 160 patients were finally included in the study. According to preoperative use of gabapentin, patients were divided into the observation group (n = 75, received gabapentin) and the control group (n = 85, did not receive gabapentin). The baseline data, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, postoperative Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) scores, and incidence of adverse reactions were collected. There were no significant differences observed between the two groups in terms of age, body mass index, prostate volume, surgery duration, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, history of hypertension and diabetes mellitus, VAS scores at postoperative 36 hours and 48 hours, and RSS scores at postoperative 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, and 48 hours (p > 0.05). Compared to the control group, the observation group had significantly lower VAS scores at postoperative 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours (p < 0.001), and the incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower within 24 hours after surgery (p < 0.05). Preoperative administration of gabapentin before PKRP could reduce pain severity and the incidence of adverse reactions and improve anesthetic effects in older adults with BPH, which is conducive to postoperative recovery.

Comparative analysis of the safety and efficacy of 1470-nm diode laser enucleation of the prostate and plasmakinetic resection of prostate in the treatment of large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia (>80 ml)

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of 1470-nm diode laser enucleation of the prostate (DiLEP) with that of plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in treating patients with large benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH > 80ml). Methods The clinical data from 211 cases of BPH (>80 ml) were collected for analysis. The patients were divided into two groups: the PKRP group (n = 118) and the DiLEP group (n = 93), based on the surgical method used. Result The DiLEP group demonstrated significantly lower surgical time (p < 0.001), intraoperative bleeding (p < 0.001), bladder flushing time (p = 0.003), indwelling catheter time (p < 0.005), and length of hospital stay (p = 0.018) compared to the PKRP group. However, the quality of the prostatectomy was significantly higher in the DiLEP group (p = 0.005). The Qmax for the DiLEP group was significantly higher than that of the PKRP group (p < 0.05). Compared to the PKRP group, the incidence of urinary incontinence in the DiLEP group increased significantly 4 weeks post-surgery (p = 0.026), although the need for blood transfusion during surgery was significantly reduced (p = 0.037). Conclusion Both DiLEP and PKRP are safe and effective methods for treating large-volume BPH. However, DiLEP offers advantages such as more thorough glandular resection, shorter surgical time, reduced bleeding, quicker recovery, and fewer complications.

Association between interleukin-6 and lower urinary tract symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia

ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between IL-6 in prostatic tissue/blood sample and BPH-LUTS, so as to preliminarily discover an indicator of inflammation that could show the severity of LUTS. Patients and methodsThe prostatic tissues and blood samples were collected from 56 patients who underwent transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (TUPKRP). The association between IL-6 detected on prostatic tissues/blood sample and LUTS parameters, including international prostate symptom score (IPSS), peak flow rate (Qmax) and urodynamic parameters were analyzed with SPSS version 18.0, and p-value <0.05 was chosen as the criterion for statistical significance. ResultsThe TPSA and prostate volume (PV) were found to be higher in the inflammation group (p=0.021, 0.036). There was a positive association between prostate tissue inflammation and LUTS ([IPSS, storage symptoms score (SSS), voiding symptoms score (VSS), p<0.05], [Qmax, p=0.025], [obstruction, p=0.027] and [AUR, p=0.018]). The level of serum IL-6 was significantly higher in inflammatory group (p=0.008). However, no differences were observed in different degrees of inflammation (p=0.393). The level of IL-6 in prostatic tissue significantly increased with the degree of inflammation (p<0.001), and the intensity of IL-6 expression was statistically correlative with the degree of inflammation (p<0.001). The IL-6 expression in prostatic tissue was statistically relevant with IPSS (p=0.018) and SSS (p=0.012). ConclusionIL-6 expression in prostatic tissue is associated with storage IPSS, suggesting chronic inflammation might contribute to storage LUTS.

Using Haemocoagulase Agkistrodon in Patients Undergoing Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate: A Pilot, Real-World, and Propensity Score-Matched Study.

Objectives To compare the clinical outcomes of using different hemostatic agents after transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (TUPKP) in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients. Methods The patients were divided into 5 groups according to the hemostatic agents used after TUPKP, including the haemocoagulase agkistrodon for injection (HCA), hemocoagulase for injection (HC), hemocoagulase bothrops atrox for injection (HCB), ethylenediamine diaceturate injection (EDD), and tranexamic acid (TXA). Propensity score matching was performed based on age, body mass index, prostate volume, hypertension status, fasting blood glucose, smoking, and drinking history. The hospitalization time, bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheterization time, the patency of urine flow, and blood transfusion records were used as outcome indicators to compare the clinical effects of these five agents. Results We finally matched 65 pairs receiving HCA or HC, 71 pairs receiving HCA or HCB, 38 pairs receiving HCA or TXA, and 29 pairs receiving HCA or EDD. Compared with HC, HCA given during the perioperative period significantly reduced the median hospitalization time [7.00 days (5.00, 8.00) vs. 9.00 days (8.00, 10.00); p < 0.001] and median catheterization time (109.00 hours [88.00, 129.00] vs. 164.00 hours [114.00, 189.00], p < 0.001). Compared with EDD, the median hospitalization time (7.00 days [6.00, 8.00] vs. 10.00 days [8.00, 11.00]; p < 0.001) and median catheterization time (113.00 hours [95.00, 143.00] vs. 160.00 hours [139.00, 168.00]; p < 0.001) were also significant shorter in HCA group. Compared with HCB, median bladder irrigation time (45.00 hours [27.00, 71.00] vs. 49.00 hours [45.00, 72.00]; p = 0.04) was shorter in the HCA group. However, there were no statistical differences in outcomes between HCA and TXA. Conclusions HCA probably has an advantage over HC, HCB, and EDD in reducing the hospitalization time, catheterization time, and bladder irrigation time among BPH patients undergoing TUPKP.

Clinical Study on the Application of Preserved Urethral Mucosa at the Prostatic Apex in Transurethral Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate.

ObjectiveTo explore the differences in the clinical efficacy, complications, and safety of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) by the conventional approach versus the approach preserving the urethral mucosa at the prostatic apex in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).MethodsA total of 90 patients with PKRP admitted to the First Hospital of Qinhuangdao from December 2018 to March 2021 were selected and divided into a control group (conventional PKRP, n = 45) and an observation group (PKRP with preserved urethral mucosa at the prostatic apex, n = 45). The clinical efficacy, safety, and sexual function of the groups were evaluated using the patients’ International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), prostate volume, maximum flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual (PVR), blood loss, surgical resection efficiency, and surgical complication data.ResultsThe differences in the preoperative indicators, glandectomy quality, and glandectomy rate between the groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). However, in the observation group, the surgery time and blood loss were significantly lower compared with the control group, and the resection efficiency was significantly higher, with statistical significance (P < 0.05). In the follow-up, one month after surgery, the IPSS and QoL were lower in the observation group than in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05); three months after surgery, the PVR, IPSS, QoL, and Qmax scores were similar between the groups, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). In terms of surgical complications, the incidences of urinary incontinence and other complications after catheter extraction were significantly lower in the observation group than in the control group, and the differences between the groups were statistically significant (P < 0.05).ConclusionCompared with conventional PKRP, PKRP with preserved urethral mucosa at the prostatic apex can lead to immediate urinary continence after catheter extraction, reduce intraoperative blood loss, and shorten the surgery time, thus improving the surgical efficiency.

Comparison of effectiveness and postoperative complications of different surgical methods in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials.

BackgroundMore and more new surgical procedures for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) are proposed creatively. However, the existing clinical evidence shows that the effectiveness and safety of various procedures exist inconsistent.MethodsThe randomized controlled trials comparing the international prostate score, length of hospital stay, maximum urinary flow rate, operation time, and complication rates of prostatic artery embolization (PAE), Greenlight-XPS Laser prostate vaporization procedure (GLL PVP), diode laser enucleation of prostate (DILEP) and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP), transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with BPH were screened out in databases. The primary outcome was pooled using a restricted maximum likelihood-based random-effect model and inverse variance-based fixed-effect model. Cochrane Q statistics and I2 statistics were computed to quantify between-study heterogeneity. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed using the revised Cochrane risk of bias tool.ResultsThis meta-analysis ultimately included 14 original research papers, with 1,940 participants enrolled. Eight studies were considered to be at moderate risk of bias, while the others were at mild risk of bias. Although the improvement in functional outcome of the DILEP procedure was equivalent to that of the PKRP procedure, the DILEP procedure group had fewer hospital stays than the PKRP group (P=0.01). In addition, even though the performance of the GLL PVP procedure in the improvement of functional outcome was inferior to the counterpart of TURP (P=0.64), it had a much fewer hospital stays (P=0.01). Moreover, there is still insufficient evidence for the improvement of subjective functional indicators of postoperative patients with PAE compared with TURP [international prostate symptom score (IPSS): P=0.73; IPSS QoL: P=0.91], but achieved less satisfactory objective functional outcomes (Qmax: P=0.06; PVR: P=0.00).DiscussionNew surgical procedures such as GLL PVP, PAE, and DILEP were safer than traditional TURP procedures. However, it is not superior to traditional surgery in the improvement of clinical symptoms. In clinical practice, the pros and cons of the new operation and the traditional operation should be carefully weighed, and the operation that is most suitable for the patient's condition should be selected.

Transurethral plasmakinetic resection versus enucleation for benign prostatic hyperplasia: comparison of intraoperative safety profiles based on endoscopic surgical monitoring system

ObjectiveTo compare the intraoperative safety profiles of transurethral plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PK-TURP) with transurethral plasmakinetic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (PK-EEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) based on endoscopic surgical monitoring system (ESMS).MethodsA total of 128 patients who were diagnosed with BPH were stratified based on prostate volume (PV) and accepted PK-EEP or PK-TURP treatment at 1:1 ratio. The ESMS as a novel method was used to monitor blood loss and fluid absorption during the operation. Clinical parameters such as intraoperative blood loss volume, fluid absorption volume, operation time, tissue weight of resection, preoperative and postoperative red blood cell count (RBC), hemoglobin concentration (HB), hematocrit (HCT), electrolyte, postoperative bladder irrigation time, indwelling catheter time, hospital stay time and other associated complications were documented and compared between two groups.ResultsNo significant differences in majority of baseline characteristics were observed among patients with different prostate volumes between two surgical methods. For patients with prostate volume < 40 ml, the average operation time of patients who received PK-EEP treatment was much more than those who received PK-TURP (P = 0.003). On the other hand, for patients with prostate volume > 40 ml, the PK-TURP surgery was associated with a significant increase in intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.021, in PV 40–80 ml group; P = 0.014, in PV > 80 ml group), fluid absorption (P = 0.011, in PV 40–80 ml group; P = 0.006, in PV > 80 ml group) and postoperative bladder irrigation time as well as indwelling catheter time but decrease in resected tissue weight compared to the PK-EEP treatment.ConclusionThe ESMS plays an important role in comparison of intraoperative safety profiles between PK-TURP and PK-EEP. Our data suggest that PK-TURP treatment is associated with a decreased operation time in patients with prostate volume < 40 ml and the PK-EEP treatment is associated with decreased intraoperative blood loss, fluid absorption and increased tissue resection for patients with prostate volume > 40 ml. Our results indicate that the size of prostate should be considered when choosing the right operation method.

Clinical practice guideline for transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia (2021 Edition)

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is highly prevalent among older men, impacting on their quality of life, sexual function, and genitourinary health, and has become an important global burden of disease. Transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate (TUPKP) is one of the foremost surgical procedures for the treatment of BPH. It has become well established in clinical practice with good efficacy and safety. In 2018, we issued the guideline “2018 Standard Edition”. However much new direct evidence has now emerged and this may change some of previous recommendations. The time is ripe to develop new evidence-based guidelines, so we formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members posed 31 questions relevant to the management of TUPKP for BPH covering the following areas: questions relevant to the perioperative period (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative) of TUPKP in the treatment of BPH, postoperative complications and the level of surgeons’ surgical skill. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of TUPKP for BPH, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the grade criteria by the European Association of Urology. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of an ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 36 statements. Among them, 23 carried strong recommendations, and 13 carried weak recommendations for the stated procedure. They covered questions relevant to the aforementioned three areas. The preoperative period for TUPKP in the treatment of BPH included indications and contraindications for TUPKP, precautions for preoperative preparation in patients with renal impairment and urinary tract infection due to urinary retention, and preoperative prophylactic use of antibiotics. Questions relevant to the intraoperative period incorporated surgical operation techniques and prevention and management of bladder explosion. The application to different populations incorporating the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in the treatment of normal volume (< 80 ml) and large-volume (≥ 80 ml) BPH compared with transurethral urethral resection prostate, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate and open prostatectomy; the efficacy and safety of TUPKP in high-risk populations and among people taking anticoagulant (antithrombotic) drugs. Questions relevant to the postoperative period incorporated the time and speed of flushing, the time indwelling catheters are needed, principles of postoperative therapeutic use of antibiotics, follow-up time and follow-up content. Questions related to complications incorporated types of complications and their incidence, postoperative leukocyturia, the treatment measures for the perforation and extravasation of the capsule, transurethral resection syndrome, postoperative bleeding, urinary catheter blockage, bladder spasm, overactive bladder, urinary incontinence, urethral stricture, rectal injury during surgery, postoperative erectile dysfunction and retrograde ejaculation. Final questions were related to surgeons’ skills when performing TUPKP for the treatment of BPH. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for patients having TUPKP for the treatment of BPH.

SC106 - Comparison between Thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis

SC106 - Comparison between Thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75 years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis

Application of Two New Feature Fusion Networks to Improve Real-time Prostate Capsula Detection.

Excess prostate tissue is trimmed near the prostate capsula boundary during transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate (PKEP) and transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate (PKRP) surgeries. If a large portion of the tissue is removed, a prostate capsula perforation can potentially occur. As such, real-time accurate prostate capsula (PC) detection is critical for the prevention of these perforations. This study investigated the potential for using image denoising, image dimension reduction and feature fusion to improve real-time prostate capsula detection with two objectives. First, this paper mainly studied feature selection and input dimension reduction. Secondly, image denoising was evaluated, as it is of paramount importance to transient stability assessment based on neural networks. Two new feature fusion techniques, maxpooling bilinear interpolation single-shot multibox detector (PBSSD) and bilinear interpolation single shot multibox detector (BSSD) were proposed. Before original images were sent to the neural network, they were processed by principal component analysis (PCA) and adaptive median filter (AMF) for dimension reduction and image denoising. The results showed that the application of PCA and AMF with PBSSD increased the mean average precision (mAP) for prostate capsula images by 8.55% and reached 80.15%, compared with single shot multibox detector (SSD) alone. Application of PCA with BSSD increased the mAP for prostate capsula images by 4.6% compared with SSD alone. Compared with other methods, ours were proven to be more accurate for real-time prostate capsula detection. The improved mAP results suggest that the proposed approaches are powerful tools for improving SSD networks.

Comparison of bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate by a three year retrospective observational study

Comprehensive evaluation of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is inadequate. This single-centre, retrospective observational study was designed to compare their efficacy, complications and sexual function. A total of 215 patients under PVP or PKRP were included in the study, propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to match the baseline characteristics of the two groups, and perioperative and three-year follow-up data were compared between them. Finally, 120 patients (60 for PVP and 60 for PKRP) were matched after PSM. Compared with the PKRP group, the intraoperative haemoglobin loss was lower (9.08 vs 13.75 g/L, P < 0.001) and the duration of catheterization and postoperative hospital stay were shorter (2.97 vs 4.10 day, P < 0.001; 3.95 vs 5.13 day, P < 0.001, respectively), but the operation time was longer (56.72 vs 49, 90 min, P < 0.001) in the PVP group. Urination measurements were improved for both groups after surgery, although no significant differences were found between them during follow-up. Sexual function after surgery was partly increased; however, frequent retrograde and discomfortable ejaculation occurred in both groups. In addition, dysuria incidence and retreatment were higher in the PVP group at 12 months. In conclusion, PVP is safe and effective in relieving BPH-related lower urinary tract symptoms with less perioperative blood loss and earlier recovery without inferior sexual function effects. However, the study is potentially affected by residual unmeasured confounding.

Comparison between thulium laser vapoenucleation and plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in men aged 75years and older in a real-life setting: a propensity score analysis.

Urologists may hesitate to offer transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) because of increased morbidity in elderly patients. We aimed to compare data on postoperative outcomes of elderly men undergoing bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) as compared to thulium laser vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP). We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients aged ≥ 75years who underwent benign prostatic hyperplasia surgery. Differences between interventions were estimated using propensity scores (PS) to adjust for different patients characteristics. Between 2017 and 2020, 275 men were included in the analysis. Propensity score retrieved 65 patients in each group. Median age was 78 (4) years in B-TURP group and 78 (6) in ThuVEP group. Median prostate volume was 63 (35) ml and 54 (24) ml in B-TURP group and ThuVEP group, respectively. Only American Society of Anesthesiologists score was significantly higher in ThuVEP group (p = 0.006). Median operation time, catheterization time, and hospital stay were similar in both groups (55min, 2 and 3days). Overall, 84.6% of men had no complications, with no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.234). Only one patient in B-TURP group experienced a Clavien grade IIIb complication. By 1year, there were a statistically significant differences in International Prostate Symptom Score (p = 0.000) in favor of B-TURP group and in maximal urine flow rate (p = 0.000) in favor of ThuVEP group. Both procedures showed excellent functional improvements one year after surgery with a low rate of major complications in men aged ≥ 75years with small-to-medium sized prostates.

A prospective randomized study comparing bipolar plasmakinetic transurethral resection of the prostate and monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate for the treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: efficacy, sexual function, Quality of Life, and complications

ABSTRACTObjective:To generate high-quality data comparing the clinical efficacy and safety profile between monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (M-TURP) and bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PK-TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).Materials and Methods:Prospective, randomized, single-blinded study conducted in a tertiary-care public institution (Dec/2014-Aug/2016). Inclusion criteria: prostate of <80g in patients with drug-refractory lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS), complications derived from BPH, or both. Exclusion criteria: a history of pelvic surgery/radiotherapy, neurogenic bladder dysfunction or documented/suspected prostate carcinoma. Treatment efficacy evaluated at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Efficacy outcomes: international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality-of-life (QoL) score, international index of erectile function-5 (IIEF-5), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVRU) volume, and prostate volume (PV). Complications and sequelae also assessed. Comparisons performed with parametric/non-parametric tests.Results:Out of the 100 hundred patients, 84 qualified for the analysis (45 M-TURP/39 PK-TURP). No significant differences found in baseline characteristics or operative data, except for a longer operative time in PK-TURP (MD:7.9min; 95%CI:0.13-15.74; p=0.04). No differences found in IPSS, Qmax or PVRU volume. QoL score at 12 months was higher in PK-TURP (MD:0,9points; 95%CI:0.18-1.64; p=0.01). No differences in sexual function, PV, complications or sequelae were found. This study is “rigorous” (Jadadscale) and has a low risk of bias (Cochrane-Handbook).Conclusions:Based on this controlled trial, there is not significant variation in effectiveness and safety between M-TURP and PK-TURP for the treatment of BPH. The small difference in QoL between PK-TURP and M-TURP at the one-year follow-up is not perceivable by the patients and, therefore, not clinically relevant.

Minimally Invasive Treatment of a Completely Obstructed Rectal Anastomosis by Using a Transanal Plasmakinetic Resectoscope: a Case Report and Review of Literature

We present a case of successful minimally invasive treatment of a completely obstructed rectal anastomosis by using a transanal plasmakinetic resectoscope, along with a review of the relevant literature. A 75-year-old man underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Complete obstruction of the rectal anastomosis was visualized at 6.0 cm from the anal verge, 5 months later. We carefully cut at the center of the circular staple line to find the orifice of anastomosis with a plasmakinetic resectoscope. Then, a sufficient amount of fibrotic tissue at the stenosis was resected to maintain the continuity of the bowel. At 4 months follow-up, the patient had complete resolution of symptoms. Transanal plasmakinetic resection is a possible choice for treatment of a completely obstructed colorectal anastomosis. However, these techniques have risks and should be implemented with great caution in selected patients by skilled endoscopists or surgeons.

Holmium Laser Enucleation Versus Bipolar Plasmakinetic Resection for Management of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Patients with Large-Volume Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Objectives: To compare the safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) vs bipolar plasmakinetic resection of prostate (BPRP) in the management of large-sized (≥75 g) benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: This randomized-controlled trial recruited 145 symptomatic BPH patients who had failed medical management, and who had undergone either HoLEP (Versa pulse® 100 W; n = 73) or BPRP (AUTOCON® II 400 ESU; n = 72). Both groups were compared using the Mann-Whitney, chi-square, Student-t, or Fisher exact tests as appropriate. Preoperative vs postoperative findings (24 months) were compared using paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The two groups were comparable for most preoperative findings including prostate size (p = 0.629), although HoLEP included more patients on anticoagulants (p = 0.001). HoLEP was associated with significantly less operative duration (p < 0.001), hemoglobin loss (p < 0.001), catheterization duration (p = 0.009), and hospital stay (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in total complications (p = 0.291) and each separate complication. Blood transfusion was reported only with BPRP (p = 0.058). At 24 months of follow-up, there was significant improvement in all the parameters in each group (International Prostate Symptom Score [IPSS], maximum urinary flow rate [Qmax], quality of life [QoL], and postvoid residual urine [PVRU]; p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between both groups in postoperative IPSS (p = 0.08), Qmax (p = 0.051), QoL (p = 0.057), or PVRU (p = 0.069). There was significantly better percentage improvement of both IPSS (p = 0.006) and QoL (p = 0.025) in HoLEP. HoLEP and smaller removed (resected or enucleated) tissues were associated with a reduction in the primary outcomes (hemoglobin loss and operative duration) in logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: HoLEP showed better safety profile with significantly less operative duration, hemoglobin loss, hospital stay, and catheterization duration. Although both procedures were effective, HoLEP showed significantly better percentage improvement of both IPSS and QoL. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04143399.

Medicated plaster at Dazhui (GV 14) for preventing perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing PKRP and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy

To observe the preventive effect of medicated plaster at Dazhui (GV 14) on preventing perioperative hypothermia in patients undergoing plasmakinetic resection of prostate (PKRP) and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy. A total of 300 patients with ASA gradeⅠorⅡreceiving ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy or PKRP under total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group, 150 cases in each group. The patients in the control group received routine heat preservation measures, while on the basis of the control group, the patients in the observation group were treated with medicated plaster at Dazhui (GV 14) 30 min before operation. The temperature (ear temperature), mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) at each time point (resting state before operation, 5, 10 min into operation, at the end of operation, 5 and 10 min after operation) were recorded; the number of hypothermia, the classification of postoperative shivering degree, operation time, propofol dosage, intraoperative infusion volume and intraoperative flushing fluid volume were recorded. The temperature at 5 and 10 min into operation as well as at the end of operation in the two groups was all lower than that before operation and at previous time point (P<0.01). The temperature at 5 and 10 min after operation in the two groups was all higher than that at previous time point (P<0.01), but still lower than that before operation (P<0.01). The temperature at 10 min into operation, at the end of operation, 5 and 10 min after operation in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P<0.01, P<0.05). The total incidence rate of hypothermia in the observation group was 2.0% (3/150), which was significantly lower than 13.3% (20/150) in the control group (P<0.01). The total incidence rate of shivering was 18.0% (27/150) in the observation group and 28.7% (43/150) in the control group (P>0.05). The medicated plaster at Dazhui (GV 14) can effectively prevent perioperative hypothermia and improve comfort in patients undergoing PKRP and ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy.

Thulium laser vaporesection (ThuVaRP) versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in benign prostate hyperplasia in term of safety and efficacy: A two-year-follow-up study in Erbil, Iraq

Background and objective: Prostate Thulium laser vaporization is a novel treatment option for a bladder outlet obstruction caused by benign prostate enlargement. However, this surgical technique has not yet been standardized. We present our finding of using Tm vaporesection of the prostate. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of thulium laser versus bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate for treating patients with benign prostatic obstruction. Methods: Sixty three consecutive patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia attending public and private clinics in Erbil city were included in a comparative study from June 2014 to July 2016. Thulium laser vaporesection of the prostate was done for Group I (n = 31), and transurethral resection of the prostate was done for Group II (n = 32). All cases were evaluated preoperatively and were evaluated at 6-24 months postoperatively by international prostate symptom score, post void residual urine volume, and quality of life. Forty four patients completed the two years of follow up. Results: Thulium laser vaporization was significantly superior to bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate in term of catheterization time (1.2 ± 0.7 vs 4.9 ± 1.7 days, P ≤0.001), hospital stay (1.5 ± 0.9 days vs 3.2 ± 1.6 days, P = 0.001) and drop in hemoglobin (0.8 ± 0.3 vs 2.35 ± 0.4 g/dl, P ≤0.001) and inferior to PKRP operation time (68.2 ± 27.3 vs 58.3 ± 22.7, P = 0.122). Both groups resulted in a significant improvement from baseline in terms of subjective symptoms scoring, but no significant difference was found between the two groups. Conclusion: Thulium laser vaporesection of the prostate is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic obstruction, with low perioperative morbidity however, both procedures showed no significant difference in terms of international prostate symptom score, post void residual urine volume and quality of life.

Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate and Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Massive Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (>80 ml).

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical safety and effectiveness of transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) vs. transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) more than 80 ml.Material/MethodsFrom June 2015 to February 2019, 179 BPH patients with prostate volume greater than 80 ml were enrolled and separated into a PKEP (n=81) group and a PKRP group (n=98). The patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 6 months. We collected and analyzed data from the international Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), residual urine volume (RUV), quality of life (QOL), maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), and international erectile function index (ILEF-5). The clinical data collected during and after the operation and surgical complications were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsThe PKEP group had significantly shorter operation time, bladder flushing time, indwelling catheter time, and hospitalization time, and has less intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative secondary hemorrhage, bladder neck contracture, capsule perforation, and retrograde ejaculation (P<0.05). Compared with the PKRP group, the postoperative IPSS and QOL scores were significantly lower in the PKEP group (P<0.05), while the excision glandular tissue weight and Qmax were significantly improved (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in ILEF-5 scores, RUV, urethral stricture, urinary incontinence, or erectile dysfunction between the 2 groups (p>0.05).ConclusionsPKEP treatment of BPH with a large volume (>80 ml) has the advantages of complete gland resection, good surgical effect, improved surgical safety, and reduced intraoperative and postoperative complications.

GreenLight Laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate with front-firing emission versus plasmakinetic resection of the prostate for benign prostate hyperplasia.

BackgroundAlthough the conventional, monopolar transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) has proven to be an effective and relatively safe treatment for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), many new endoscopic technologies have been introduced to treat BPH. With the development of laser, there are several alternative transurethral procedures embracing laser therapies. Herein, this study sought to explore the efficacy, safety and follow-up of GreenLight laser photoselective vapo-enucleation of the prostate (PVEP) with front-firing emission compared with plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) used to surgically manage BPH.MethodsData from patients who underwent either GreenLight laser PVEP or PKRP were retrospectively collected from March 2013 to May 2018. Perioperative data from both groups were compared.ResultsTotally, 43 and 45 patients were included in the PVEP and PKRP groups, respectively. No significant difference was observed in excision efficiency ratio (resected prostate weight/operation time) between the two groups (P=0.372). The efficiency ratio of the first 20 PVEP procedures (0.36±0.09 g/min) was significantly lower than that of the second 23 PVEP procedures (0.45±0.18 g/min) (P=0.042). The PVEP group experienced a shorter duration of catheterization, postoperative hospital stay and irrigation time than the PKRP group (P<0.001, P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.937) in terms of overall postoperative complications. Three months after surgery, the international prostate symptoms (IPSS) score, quality of life (QOL) score, postvoid residual (PVR) volume and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) were decreased in both groups (P<0.001 for all) and were comparable between both groups (P=0.635, 0.662, 0.671 and 0.924, respectively).ConclusionsGreenLight laser PVEP with front-firing emission was safe and effective modality in treating patients with BPH with short-term follow-up. PVEP was associated with shorter catheterization and postoperative hospital stay time compared with PKRP.