Plasma Ranitidine Concentration Research Articles

Gastrokinetic activity of Morinda citrifolia aqueous fruit extract and its possible mechanism of action in human and rat models

Aims of the studyThis study was to investigate the gastrokinetic activity of Morinda citrifolia aqueous fruit extract (AFE) in human subjects by examining the GI absorption of ranitidine, a putative indicator of GI motility and to elucidate its possible gastrokinetic mechanism of action in rats. Materials and methodsThe single-dose, randomized, open-label and 2-period crossover study was performed on 20 Thai healthy volunteers with a washout period of 14 day between the doses. AFE or drinking water was administered orally 30min prior to a single oral administration of ranitidine (300mg). Blood samples were collected over a 12h period after drug administration and the pharmacokinetic parameters of ranitidine were calculated. The gastrokinetic mechanism of action of AFE was elucidated by measurement of its contractile response on the isolated rat gastric fundus strip. ResultsThe area under the plasma ranitidine concentration–time curve and the maximal plasma ranitidine concentration were significantly increased after pretreatment with AFE (p=0.001). The plasma ranitidine concentrations were significantly greater at 30–120min after its administration. AFE produced a definite contractile response of a rat gastric fundus strip with a dose dependency. Scopoletin at the same equivalent dose present in AFE elicited a concentration-dependent contraction that amounted to 45% of the maximal response to AFE. The contractile response of both AFE and scopoletin was mediated through the 5-HT4 receptor. ConclusionAFE has a unique gastrokinetic activity in enhancement of the rate and the extent of ranitidine absorption. The underlying mechanism can be attributed, at least in part, to the ability of its active component: scopoletin to stimulate the 5-HT4 receptor.

Effect of Da‐Cheng‐Qi decoction on the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in rats

Da Cheng Qi decoction (DCQD) is composed of Dahuang, Houpu, Zhishi and Mangxiao. It is a formula created under the theory of Chinese medicine to purge the 'evil heat' in the gastrointestitinal tract, which arises from the ileus and acute pancreatitis. The present study was conducted to evaluate the herb-drug interaction between DCQD and ranitidine, which are often co-administered in clinical practice. Ranitidine was administered orally alone or together with DCQD to rats, and plasma ranitidine concentrations were measured by HPLC. Following oral administration, ranitidine plasma levels revealed curves characterized by peaks at 1.8 and 4.2 h corresponding to ranitidine alone and ranitidine with DCQD at mean concentrations of 16.315 and 1.455 microg/mL, respectively. After ranitidine was orally dosed alone or with DCQD, the half-lives were 1.787 and 3.758 h, while the area under the concentration-time curve (0-12 h) was 28.083 and 9.826 microg/L h, respectively, suggesting that DCQD might significantly affect the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in rats. When physicians or pharmacists administer DCQD and ranitidine, they must make a careful effort to adjust the dosage of the drug and Chinese decoction, or avoid the herb-drug co-administration.

Effects of Gender and Phase of the Menstrual Cycle on the Kinetics of Ranitidine in Healthy Volunteers

The present study was undertaken to determine if differences exist in the pharmacokinetic parameters of oral ranitidine caused by gender and stage of the menstrual cycle. The study was performed in two steps, in the first a pharmacokinetic study was performed on 10 men (average age 35.5 yrs) and 10 women (average age 34.7 yrs) during the follicular phase, and in the second the pharmacokinetic study was performed only on the same women in their luteal phase. Subjects received a tablet dose of 300 mg ranitidine, and blood samples were drawn at several times after its ingestion. Plasma ranitidine concentration was determined by high performance liquid chromatography. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic parameters of women and men revealed statistically significant differences both in distribution volume (Vd) with values of 2.0 and 6.3 l/kg, Area Under Curve (AUC) with values of 7312.15 and 11471.94 ng/ml/h, and clearance (CLt) with values of 0.65 and 0.59 l/kg/h, respectively. Several pharmacokinetic parameters in women were different in the follicular compared to the luteal phase; for example, Vd was 2.0 and 5.6 l/kg, AUC was 7312.15 and 5195.83 ng/ml/h, and CLt was 0.65 and 0.97 l/kg/h, in the respective phases. Moreover, the maximum concentration (Cmax) was 1086 ng/ml in the follicular vs. 864 ng/ml in the luteal phase. The first study detected differences between men and women in several pharmacokinetic parameters, mainly those indicative of drug availability, for example, Vd, AUC, and CLt. Comparison of data obtained in the follicular phase with those obtained in the luteal phase revealed differences in most pharmacokinetic parameters, which is seemingly indicative of the characteristic physiological changes associated with the luteal phase that largely affect the kinetics and availability of drugs such as ranitidine. Although it has been postulated that hormonal fluctuation within the menstrual cycle phase is the primary cause of documented gender differences in the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs, further study of related factors is required to fully understand how gender and menstrual cycle rhythms affect the pharmacokinetic process in their entirety.

Gastric pH, Concentrations of Ranitidine in Gastric Juice and Plasma, and the Pharmacokinetics of Infused Ranitidine in Critically Ill Patients

The relationship between histamine H2-antagonist pharmacokinetic behaviour and the response of intragastric pH to physiological stress, and vital support measurements, have been prospectively evaluated in ten critically ill patients of mean (± s.d.) age 61 ± 16 years, mean weight 60 ± 9.7 kg, and APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II score 10 ± 6. In this double-blind, cross-over study patients received either a continuous ranitidine infusion made locally by Chimi-Darou, Iran (study drug) or Zantac (control drug). Subjects were randomized to receive 6.25 mg h−1 of the study drug for 24 h during the initial phase, after which drugs were switched for the next 24 h. The two phases of the study were separated by a wash-out period of 16 h. Intragastric pH was measured for 72 h with an antimony pH probe catheter. Concentrations of ranitidine in plasma and gastric juice were determined by HPLC. Mean ± s.e.m. gastric pH was 4.47 ± 0.65 for patients receiving the locally made study drug and 4.25 ± 0.69 for those receiving Zantac (P=0.5351). There was good correlation between intragastric pH and plasma ranitidine concentration (r=0.97, P=0.0055 and r=0.94, P=0.169 for study and control drugs, respectively). Ranitidine was also present in significant quantities in the gastric juice. There was no correlation between intragastric pH and gastric concentration of ranitidine (r=0.37, P=0.6142) for the control drug nor between the concentrations of the drug in the gastric juice and plasma (r=0.055, P=0.9292). There was no correlation between median pH and APACHE II score or Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score (P=0.557 and P=0.541, respectively).

The effect of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine.

This open study evaluated the influence of renal function on the pharmacokinetics of ranitidine (50 mg i.v. infusion given over 6 min). Five groups, each of 8 subjects, 1 with normal renal function and 4 with different degrees of renal impairment were studied. Renal function was assessed in each patient by 51Cr-EDTA (glomerular filtration rate, GFR), creatinine clearance (GFR) and N-methylnicotinamide clearance (reflecting glomerular and tubular function). Sixteen blood samples (5 ml) taken up to 48 h post dose from each subject were analysed for plasma ranitidine concentrations by reversed phase HPLC. Patient groups with renal impairment had significantly increased AUC infinity and t1/2 with corresponding decreases in CLp and lambda z when compared with normal subjects. There was also a significant increase in tmax but not in Cmax. There was a high linear correlation between the degree of renal impairment and ranitidine clearance. In patients with GFR < or = 20 ml min-1, the AUC infinity mean ratio (compared with normal subjects) was up to 4.6 while for patients with GFR 20-50 ml min-1, the average AUC infinity ratio was 2.6. It is recommended that the dose of ranitidine is halved in patients with GFR < or = 20 ml min-1.

Effect of preanesthetic intramuscular ranitidine on gastric acidity and volume in children

Study Objective: To evaluate the effects of preanesthetic administration of intramuscular (IM) ranitidine on pH and volume of gastric contents in children. Design: Three randomized treatment groups. Setting: Central operating rooms at a university hospital. Patients: Forty children age 1 to 10 years undergoing a variety of elective surgical procedures requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. Interventions: IM ranitidine 1 mg/kg (n = 15) or 2 mglkg (n = 15) was administered 2 hours prior to induction of anesthesia. Ten patients without ranitidine served as the control group. An orogastric tube was inserted into each patient. Measurements and Main Results: Gastric fluid pH and volume were measured every hour in the three groups. Plasma ranitidine concentrations were measured in ten patients of the ranitidine-treated groups. The mean volume of gastric fluid at induction of anesthesia was significantly lower in the ranitidine-treated patients (2.4 ml for ranitidine 1 mg/kg, 3.2 ml for ranitidine 2 mglkg) than in the controls (8.6 ml, p < 0.05). The mean pH values at induction of anesthesia were significantly higher in the ranitidine-treated patients (4.6 for 1 mg/kg, 6.7 for 2 mg/kg) than in the controls (2.1; p < 0.05). Dose-dependent plasma ranitidine concentrations were obtained. Conclusions: Preanesthetic IM ranitidine 1 to 2 mglkg resulted in a higher pH and lower volume of gastric fluid at the time of induction and in a higher pH during 3 hours of anesthesia. This therapy may be a useful adjunct to premeditation for children who have a greater than normal risk of pulmonary aspiration during anesthesia.

Intragastric pH and Pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Ranitidine During Sinusoidal and Constant-Rate Infusions

Six patients with healed duodenal ulcer completed two treatment periods with continuous i.v. infusion ranitidine. A 25-mg i.v. bolus was followed by a constant infusion at 6.25 mg/h or a sinusoidal infusion with infusion rates ranging from 3.125 to 9.375 mg/h. The sinusoidal infusion rate was designed to match the previously observed circadian changes in basal acid secretion. The peak infusion rate occurred at 19:30 h. A pharmacokinetic method was designed to predict the resultant plasma concentrations of ranitidine. Intragastric pH and plasma ranitidine concentration data were fit to a cosine function to evaluate circadian and ultradian rhythms. Plasma concentrations during the sinusoidal infusion exhibited a circadian rhythm according to model predictions. Cosinor analyses of the mean ranitidine plasma concentration data showed a mesor concentration of 237 ng/mL and amplitude of 76 ng/mL (coefficient of determination [CD] = 0.98). The acrophase in plasma concentration occurred at 2223 h, a delay of approximately 2.9 hours from the peak in the infusion rate. The constant-rate infusion resulted in a mean plasma concentration of 222 +/- 32 ng/mL. The 24-h mean intragastric pH values for the sinusoidal and constant regimens were 5.4 and 5.1, respectively (p = 0.170). The intragastric pH during the constant-rate infusion exhibited a significant circadian rhythm (CD = 0.52). The minimum pH (bathy-phase) occurred at 2031 h. No circadian rhythm was present during the sinusoidal-rate infusion (CD = 0.08). At the approximate time of the peak basal acid secretion, between 21:00 hours and midnight, the mean pH for the sinusoidal infusion was 5.77 versus 4.5 for the constant-rate infusion (p = 0.112). Sinusoidal infusions or alternate methods of increased doses at the times of peak acid output may improve around-the-clock control of intragastric pH.

Bolus or Intravenous Infusion of Ranitidine: Effects on Gastric pH and Acid Secretion

To compare the effects of intravenous bolus injection of ranitidine, continuous intravenous infusion of ranitidine, and placebo on gastric pH, acid secretion, and plasma ranitidine concentration during a 24-hour period, and to determine by survey the use, delivery methods, and costs of histamine H2-receptor antagonists in intensive care units. Double-blind, Latin-square randomized, prospective measurement of the gastric pH, acid output, and plasma ranitidine concentration over 24 hours in response to six treatment regimens in 12 patients with inactive duodenal ulcer. Eight regional hospitals were surveyed to obtain information on the use of histamine H2-receptor antagonists. Gastric acid secretion, pH, and plasma ranitidine were monitored for 24 hours on six separate days in response to placebo, intravenous bolus injection of ranitidine (50 mg every 8 hours and 75 mg every 12 hours), and continuous intravenous infusion of ranitidine (75, 150, and 300 mg every 24 hours). Intravenous infusions were significantly more effective than bolus injections. After bolus injections, hourly gastric pH values fluctuated widely, from 7.6 to 1.6, whereas during continuous infusion of 150 mg and 300 mg, hourly pH values were 3.8 or greater. The gastric pH was greater than 4.0 in 75% +/- 5% and 83% +/- 6% of determinations done during continuous intravenous infusion of 150 mg and 300 mg, respectively. Fluctuations in the plasma ranitidine concentration corresponded with changes in gastric pH and acid secretion. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists were prescribed for about 75% of patients in intensive care units and were most commonly administered by bolus rather than infusion (5:1); the cost was approximately +40 per day less by infusion. On the basis of both efficacy and cost, intermittent bolus injections should be discontinued and replaced by continuous intravenous infusion in hospitalized patients requiring treatment with histamine H2-receptor antagonists. If ranitidine is used, either 150 mg or 300 mg administered as a 24-hour continuous infusion is most effective.

Oral Bioavailability of Nizatidine and Ranitidine Concurrently Administered with Antacid

This four-way crossover open-label study on eight healthy subjects was designed to investigate the effect on bioavailability of orally administered nizatidine given concurrently with an antacid (magnesium hydroxide-aluminium hydroxide mixture). Ranitidine was used as a comparison. Subjects were hospitalized overnight for each drug application which was given as a single dose [nizatidine or ranitidine (300 mg) or antacid (20 ml) of a neutralizing capacity of 50 mmol hydrochloric acid]. Plasma nizatidine or ranitidine concentrations were measured by high performance liquid chromatography. No statistically significant difference occurred in the kinetic profile of nizatidine after antacid administration although it took longer to reach maximum concentration in plasma. The area under the concentration-time curve was also reduced (by less than 10%) and there was a longer lag between administration and absorption. Bioequivalence (Westlake test) for ranitidine in the presence or absence of antacid was confirmed (difference less than 12%). For nizatidine, with or without antacid, the value of the Westlake test was just above the limit for bioequivalence (21.4%), whereas the Student's t-test for related means (one-tailed distribution) gave P = 0.045. There was no clinically relevant nizatidine-antacid interaction at the doses used in this study.

Pharmacokinetics of ranitidine in critically ill patients.

The plasma pharmacokinetics of ranitidine (50 mg i.v.) have been studied in 17 critically ill patients in an intensive care unit. Measurements of gastric aspirate pH were also made in 16 of these patients. Ranitidine therapy was part of the patients' normal drug regimen. Ranitidine plasma concentration was measured by high performance liquid chromatography and appropriate polyexponential equations were fitted to concentration-time data to enable calculation of relevant pharmacokinetic parameters. Values of the volume of the initial dilution space (median = 89 ml kg-1) and volume of distribution at steady state (median = 1.54 l kg-1) were about 60% of corresponding mean literature values for healthy controls. Plasma clearance (median = 4.22 ml min-1 kg-1) and terminal half-life (median = 4.7 h) were about 2-3 fold less and 2-3 fold greater, respectively, than values for healthy controls. There was wide interpatient variation in all the pharmacokinetic parameters. Renal impairment was considered to be largely responsible for the low plasma clearance. Gastric aspirate pH was measured at 0, 1 and 7 h after ranitidine administration and 58% of samples were found to be above pH 4. Four patients had gastric pH values which were consistently below pH 4 despite average trough plasma ranitidine concentrations equal to or greater than those required for a 50% suppression of gastric acid secretion in normal volunteers.

Effect of Ranitidine on Gastric Acid Hypersecretion in an Infant with Short Bowel Syndrome

We studied the effect of ranitidine given in graded bolus intravenous doses on gastric acid hypersecretion in an unfed 3‐month‐old male with short bowel syndrome. We measured gastric volume and H+ serially for 12 h following each bolus and correlated inhibition of H+ secretion with plasma ranitidine concentration. In the first 4 h post drug, doses of 0.3, 1.0, 2.0, and 4.0 mg/kg resulted in 78, 93, 97, and 98% inhibition, respectively. The cumulative 12‐h effect of the drug was to inhibit H+ secretion 67, 63, 72, and 87%. The IC50 for H+ secretion was between 50 and 100 ng/ml, and the IC90 between 130 and 150 ng/ml. Volume of gastric secretions was reduced by approximately 50% by all ranitidine doses. Because gastric acid hypersecretion interferes with nutrient absorption, the infant was treated with ranitidine during a 5‐week trial of enteral feeding. A decrease in the antisecretory effect of ranitidine apparent at the end of the treatment period temporally related to an increase in oxyntic mucosal function. No adverse drug effects were observed during treatment.

Dose and concentration dependent effect of ranitidine on procainamide disposition and renal clearance in man.

The pharmacokinetics of oral procainamide (1 g) were investigated in six healthy subjects during chronic dosing with ranitidine 150 mg twice daily, and in three of the subjects when ranitidine 750 mg was administered over 12 h. The procainamide area under the plasma concentration-time curve was significantly (PQ0.02) increased by ranitidine (27.761.5 vs 31.561.8 mg l-1 h) with a significant reduction in renal clearance (379632 vs 309630 ml/min, PQ0.02). There was no change in half-life. The N-acetylprocainamide (NAPA) area under the plasma concentration-time curve was also significantly (PQ0.02) elevated by ranitidine (8.661.2 vs 9.761.3 mg 1-1 h) due to a reduction in renal clearance from 187630 to 168628 ml/min. The larger dose of ranitidine produced greater alterations in the procainamide and NAPA pharmacokinetics. Ranitidine reduced the absorption of procainamide by 10% and by 24% at the higher dose level. Two-hourly renal clearance values of procainamide were significantly (PQ0.05) reduced in the 2 to 10 h period and for NAPA between 0 to 6 and 8 to 10 h. The larger ranitidine dose reduced the renal clearances of procainamide and NAPA over the control period at each 2-hourly time period. The reductions in renal clearance are most likely mediated by competition for the renal tubular cationic secretory pathway. Clinical implications arising from this study suggest a reduction in procainamide dosage may be necessary in a small, select number of patients with high plasma ranitidine concentrations, e.g., the elderly; furthermore, failure of therapeutic response for some drugs may be due to ranitidine-induced impaired gastrointestinal absorption.

Effects of ranitidine and of cimetidine on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion

We compared the effect of oral and intravenous ranitidine, a new H2-receptor antagonist, with that of cimetidine on pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in normal subjects. Ranitidine in intravenous doses of 20, 60, and 100 mg and oral doses of 100, 150, and 200 mg inhibited acid secretion. Only the 100 mg iv ranitidine dose was substantially more effective than cimetidine. Comparable dose-related decreases in gastric secretory volume were observed. Acid inhibition correlated strongly (r = 0.90) with plasma ranitidine concentration, with the estimated plasma concentration producing 50% inhibition (IC50) being 95 ng/ml. Maximal acid inhibition achieved was 87.3%. We conclude that ranitidine is a potent inhibitor of gastric acid secretion and should be a valuable addition to the medical treatment of acid-peptic disease.

Gastro-oesophageal function in normal subjects after oral administration of ranitidine.

The aim of the study was to investigate gastro-oesophageal function in normal subjects after oral administration of 150 mg ranitidine as a single dose. The study was designed as a double blind crossover investigation. Ten healthy men, aged 26-49 years (median 29 years) joined the study. A series of oesophageal function tests were performed, starting 90 minutes after oral intake of ranitidine or placebo. Gastro-oesophageal sphincter pressure was measured using a perfused catheter system and a continuous pull-through technique. No changes in sphincter pressure could be demonstrated. Peristaltic amplitude in the body of the oesophagus as well as the duration and velocity of the peristalsis were measured after wet swallows (bolus 5 ml of water). We found no changes in these variables. Intragastric pH was measured and was higher after ranitidine than after placebo (p less than 0.005). Plasma ranitidine concentration did not correlate with intragastric pH. No effect of ranitidine could be demonstrated on the results of a standard acid clearing test. It is concluded that ranitidine, given orally in sufficient doses to suppress gastric acid secretion, does not influence gastro-oesophageal sphincter pressure or peristaltic activity in the oesophagus of normal subjects.

High dose of antacid (Mylanta II) reduces bioavailability of ranitidine.

To investigate the effect of antacid on the bioavailability and disposition of ranitidine six healthy volunteers were studied on two occasions one week apart. In the first study the received ranitidine 150 mg with 60 ml water, and in the second study they received ranitidine 150 mg plus 30 ml of an aluminium/magnesium hydroxide mixture (Mylanta II) and 30 ml water. Giving antacid reduced both the maximum plasma ranitidine concentration and the area under the curve by one-third; elimination of the drug was not changed. Thus giving a high dose of antacid significantly diminished the bioavailability of ranitidine.