Plasma Lithium Heparin Research Articles

A Comparison Study: Possible Bias in Troponin I Measurement Obtained with a Point of Care Testing and a Central Laboratory Analyzers Employing Different Biological Matrices and Anticoagulants.

high-sensitive cardiac TroponinI (hs-cTnI) is widely used for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. The latest recommendation for hs-cTnI determination is the protocol 0-1 h finalized to improve the rule out accuracy of the test. A Point of Care Testing able to guarantee these performances could be very useful due to reducing the turnaround time and ruling out patients suspected of ACS, especially by using biological matrices that are not required for centrifuge. The aim of our work is to compare the results for hs-cTnI obtained using different biological matrices and anticoagulants, obtained between Atellica® VTLi hs-cTnI POCT and Access AccuTnI+3 DxI800 performances, in order to establish a possible bias derived directly from these pre-analytical conditions. Li-heparinized pool samples were primary employ for hs-cTnI with Atellica® VTLi as whole blood, then centrifuged and tested on Atellica® VTLi and DxI800. K3EDTA pool samples were centrifuged and measured on DxI800 too. A comparison of methods was performed according to CLSI_EP-09A2 protocol. Constant and proportional errors were investigated with Deming regression. Bias between methods was evaluated with the Bland Altman test. comparing whole blood lithium heparin results obtained with Atellica versus lithium heparin and K3EDTA plasma tested on DxI 800, the Deming regression revealed a proportional error, whereas in both cases Bland Altman highlighted a minimal underestimation. A similar performance was revealed when considering plasma lithium heparin tested on Atellica versus lithium heparin and K3EDTA plasma obtained with DxI800, confirming the same underestimation. Considering values close to the cut off, no significant differences were found. in the laboratory, the estimation of the bias of two different analyzers is pivotal. Once more this is crucial when different biological matrices and anticoagulants are employed for the analysis. Our study demonstrates that no significant differences among the two matrices are present when comparing Atellica and DxI800 performances.

Commentary on "The road to reliable peptide assays is paved with good guidelines".

Commentary on "The road to reliable peptide assays is paved with good guidelines".

The effect of haemolysis on the direct and indirect ion selective electrode measurement of sodium.

We compared the effect of haemolysis in sodium measurement using indirect and direct ion-selective electrodes to test the hypothesis that haemolytic effect on sodium would be greater with indirect ion-selective electrode due to electrolyte exclusion effect from released intracellular proteins. Plasma lithium heparin samples (n = 36) from four volunteers were prepared to give a range of haemolytic indices (H-indices). Samples were analysed for sodium by indirect ion-selective electrode, H-index and total protein on an Abbott Architect c16000 and sodium by direct ion-selective electrode on a Siemens RAPIDPoint 500. Percentage changes in sodium in paired direct and indirect ion-selective electrode values were compared. Abbott H-index, which represents haemoglobin concentration in g/L, correlated with percentage negative change in sodium by direct ion-selective electrode (ρ 0.995, P < 0.001) and indirect ion-selective electrode (ρ 0.991, P < 0.001). Percentage negative change was less when sodium was measured by direct ion-selective electrode compared to indirect ion-selective electrode (Wilcoxon signed-rank Z = 3.46, P = 0.01). The difference in percentage change in sodium between direct ion-selective electrode and indirect ion-selective electrode correlated with total protein (ρ 0.751, P < 0.001). The negative bias in sodium results exceeded the reference change value of 2.2% at an H-index of 8.31 for indirect ion-selective electrode and 9.26 for direct ion-selective electrode. Haemolysis causes negative influence with sodium measured by both indirect and direct ion-selective electrode due to a dilutional hyponatremia. The additional interference in indirect ion-selective electrode is due to the electrolyte exclusion effect but this is unlikely to be clinically significant as it is small in magnitude.

Stability of serum, plasma and urine osmolality in different storage conditions: Relevance of temperature and centrifugation

BackgroundOsmolality reflects the concentration of all dissolved particles in a body fluid, and its measurement is routinely performed in clinical laboratories for the differential diagnosis of disorders related with the hydrolytic balance regulation, the renal function and in small-molecule poisonings. The aim of the study was to assess the stability of serum, plasma and urine osmolality through time and under different common storage conditions, including delayed centrifugation. MethodsBlood and urine samples were collected, and classified into different groups according to several preanalytical variables: serum or plasma lithium-heparin tubes; spun or unspun; stored at room temperature (RT), at 4°C or frozen at −21°C. Aliquots from each group were assayed over time, for up to 14days. Statistical differences were based on three different international performance criteria. ResultsWhole blood stability was higher in the presence of anticoagulant. Serum osmolality was stable for 2days at RT and 8days at 4°C, while plasma was less stable when refrigerated. Urine stability was 5days at RT, 4days at 4°C and >14days when frozen. DiscussionOsmolality may be of great interest for the management of several conditions, such as in case of a delay in the clinical suspicion, or in case of problems in sample collection or processing. The ability to obtain reliable results for samples kept up to 14days also offers the possibility to retrospectively assess baseline values for patients which may require it.

Solution Densities and Estimated Total Protein Contents Associated With Inappropriate Flotation of Separator Gel in Different Blood Collection Tubes

Clinical samples that have densities greater than that of separator gel in specimen tubes may exhibit gel flotation to the top of the specimen upon centrifugation. Inappropriate separator gel flotation can occur in specimens with high protein content. In automated analytical systems, gel flotation can lead to mechanical disruption and potential inaccurate result reporting upon aspiration into instrument sampling probes. To determine the relative specimen densities and estimated total protein contents at which specimen gel flotation would occur upon centrifugation in commonly used commercial specimen tubes, a comparative study of separator gel density was initiated using prepared dextran solutions. Specific gravity of several dextran solutions was determined by direct hydrometry. The dextran solutions were introduced to serum and plasma lithium heparin BD Vacutainer specimen tubes manufactured by Becton, Dickinson and Company and into Vacuette specimen tubes manufactured by Greiner Bio-One containing separator gel. Following centrifugation the specimen tubes were examined for gel flotation. Flotation was observed at a lower dextran solution density for Greiner than for BD tubes in both serum and plasma separator gel specimen tubes. Additionally, some differences between specimen tube lots were observed for both BD and Greiner tubes. The total protein content in clinical samples that would result in gel flotation can be estimated for different specimen container types. Differences were observed for the gel separator specific gravity in different blood collection containers. Laboratories wishing to avoid problems with inappropriate gel flotation in high protein samples should consider these observations.

Evaluation of three different specimen types (serum, plasma lithium heparin and serum gel separator) for analysis of certain analytes: clinical significance of differences in results and efficiency in use

There is a lack of consensus regarding the most appropriate specimen type for analysis of many biochemistry analytes. The aim of this study was to compare renal and lipid analyte profiles and phenytoin values in plain serum (S), serum gel (G) and plasma (lithium heparin, P) tubes and to investigate the stability of these analytes after prolonged contact with cells or gel at room temperature (RT, 20 degrees C) and as aliquoted and stored at 4 degrees C. Primary specimens were centrifuged once, maintained at RT and analysed within 2 h (T(0)) and after 24 h (T(24)) and 48 h (T(48)). For assessment of stability at 4 degrees C, two cell-free aliquots were separated from each of the primary tubes and stored at 4 degrees C and then analysed at T(24) and T(48). Differences in analyte concentrations between tubes at T(0) and following storage (at T(24) and T(48)) were evaluated for both statistical and clinical significance. At T(0) all analytes, except potassium, demonstrated equivalence between serum, gel and plasma tubes. Potassium and creatinine were more stable in gel tubes than in serum/plasma tubes. In contrast, phentytoin was stable in plain serum and plasma up to T(48) at RT, but showed a progressive and clinically significant decrease in concentration in gel tubes at T(24) and T(48) at RT. All analytes except CO(2) were stable up to T(48) when aliquoted and stored at 4 degrees C. We concluded that the serum gel tube has advantages over plain serum and plasma tubes for measurement of the analytes investigated in this study, with the exception of phenytoin. In practice, the gel tubes demonstrate enhanced analyte stability and reduce the need to aliquot specimens, with greater protection against possible contamination. Further investigation would be required to evaluate a broader range of analytes.