Plasmakinetic Enucleation Of The Prostate Research Articles

Clinical efficacy and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate versus plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate

BackgroundBenign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a common disease in elderly males, and many kinds of minimally invasive procedures can be used for the treatment of BPH. However, various procedures have caused some controversies regarding clinical outcomes, so more studies are needed to validate these controversial topics.AimsThis study aimed to explore differences of clinical efficacy, surgical features, and complications between transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) and plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) for BPH.MethodsA total of eligible 850 cases of BPH underwent TURP (the TURP group, 320 cases) or PKEP (the PKEP group, 530 cases) in the urology department of our hospital from March 2015 to 2018 were involved in this study. Then, the baseline data, surgical characteristics, IPSS, QoL, PVR, Qmax, IIEF-5, and documented complications were compared between the two groups.ResultsThe operative time, intraoperative irrigation volume, postoperative hemoglobin, decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative irrigation time and volume, catheterization time, and hospital stay of the PKEP group were significantly less than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05). At 3 months, 1, 2, and 3 years after operation, no significant differences were observed in IPSS, QoL, PVR, but the results of Qmax and IIEF-5 in the PKEP group were significantly higher than those parameters in the TURP group (all P < 0.05). The incidences of massive blood loss, postoperative secondary bleeding, blood transfusion, capsular perforation, urinary tract irritation, bladder spasm, clot retention, urinary tract infection, transient incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and the incidences of II, III grade of Clavien–Dindo classification in the PKEP group were significantly lower than those of the TURP group (all P < 0.05).ConclusionThe clinical efficacy of PKEP is compared favorably with TURP during midterm follow-up. Given the merits such as less blood loss and hospital stay, lower complications, PKEP should be given a priority for BPH.

Complications Based on Prostate Size After Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate.

Purpose: Lower urinary tract symptoms among adult men can significantly impact quality of life. We evaluated complications based on prostate size following plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate. Materials and Methods: Patients were grouped into the small prostate group (SPG, <75 g) and large prostate group (LPG, >75 g) based on preoperative imaging. Patient data on demographics, comorbidities, preoperative international prostate symptom score (IPSS), bother index (BI), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) if indicated, postvoid residual volume (PVR), indwelling catheter or self-catheterization status, and any prior surgical intervention were evaluated. Postoperative IPSS, BI, and PVR values were assessed at 6 weeks, 4 months, and yearly. Postoperative urge urinary incontinence (UUI), stress urinary incontinence (SUI), and pad use were assessed. Results: Between September 2015 and December 2020, 296 patients who underwent bipolar enucleation with minimum follow-up of 4 months were evaluated. Postoperative IPSS, BI, PVR, and PSA values at all time points were significantly decreased compared with preoperative values (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the complications between groups. Univariable and multivariable analysis found that size <75 g was predictive of stricture formation and bladder neck contracture (BNC). UUI was more common at 6 weeks in the SPG, and SUI was more common at 6 weeks in the LPG, but no difference was noted at the 4-month and 1-year time points. Pad use was equal between the two groups at all time points. Conclusions: Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate provides an effective treatment option for prostates of all sizes; however, prostates <75 g have a higher rate of BNC and urethral strictures compared with those >75 g.

Medium-term Clinical Efficacy and Complications of Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate Versus Transurethral Resection of the Prostate for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

To compare surgical characteristics, clinical efficacy, and complications of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). From January 2015 to May 2018, 370 patients underwent TURP were included into the TURP group. Meanwhile, another 370 patients underwent PKEP (matched by age, prostate volume, and duration of BPH) were included into the PKEP group. Then, the differences of surgical characteristics, clinical efficacy, and complications were compared between the two groups. The operative time, intraoperative irrigation volume, postoperative irrigation time and irrigation volume, drop in hemoglobin, blood transfusion, postoperative catheterization time, and hospital stay of the PKEP group were significantly less than those of the TURP group (P <.05). No significant differences were observed in the resected tissue weight, visual analogue scale score, and total cost of hospitalization (P >.05); The quality of life score of the PKEP group was significantly lower than that of the TURP group (P <.05). No significant differences of maximum flow rate, postvoid residual urine, Serum prostate-specific antigen, international prostate symptom score and International Index of Erectile Function score were observed (P >.05); The incidences of urinary tract irritation, massive hemorrhage, secondary hemorrhage, bladder spasm, clot retention, and retrograde ejaculation of the PKEP group were significantly lower than those of the TURP group (P <.05). PKEP and TURP are comparable regarding cost burden and clinical efficacy in medium-term follow-up. However, PKEP should be given a priority for BPH treatment because of less complication rate and better safety profile.

Complications and functional outcomes of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised-controlled studies.

There are several endoscopic enucleation procedures (EEP) using different energy sources: holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP), Greenlight® (GreenVEP) and diode (DiLEP) lasers, and plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP). The comparative outcomes among these EEPs are unclear. We aimed to compare the peri-operative and post-operative outcomes, complications and functional outcomes among different EEPs. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) checklist. Only randomised-controlled trials (RCT) comparing EEPs were included. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool for RCTs. The search identified 1153 articles and 12 RCTs were included. The number of RCTs for each comparison was, HoLEP vs ThuLEP; n = 3, HoLEP vs PKEP; n = 3, PKEP vs DiLEP; n = 3, HoLEP vs GreenVEP; n = 1, HoLEP vs DiLEP; n = 1, ThuLEP vs PKEP; n = 1. Operative time was shorter and blood loss was lower with ThuLEP compared with HoLEP, whereas operative time was shorter for HoLEP compared with PKEP. Blood loss was lower with HoLEP and DiLEP compared with PKEP. There were no Clavien-Dindo IV-V complications, and the incidence of Clavien-Dindo I complications was lower with ThuLEP compared with HoLEP. No significant differences were detected among EEPs regarding urinary retention, stress urinary incontinence, bladder neck contracture or urethral stricture. Lower International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and higher quality of life (QoL) scores were in favour of ThuLEP compared with HoLEP at 1 month. EEP improves symptoms and uroflowmetry parameters with a low incidence of high-grade complications. ThuLEP was associated with shorter operative time, lower blood loss, and lower incidence of low-grade complications compared with HoLEP.

Predictors of Storage Symptom Improvement After Plasma Kinetic Enucleation of the Prostate

ObjectiveTo investigate which preoperative findings portend poor improvement in storage symptoms in patients undergoing plasma kinetic enucleation of prostate (PKEP). MethodsA single surgeon series of patients who had undergone PKEP with minimum 1 year follow up were evaluated. Patients were grouped into those with less than 33% improvement in storage symptoms (LIS) according to the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and those with greater than 33% improvement in storage symptoms (GIS). Pre and postoperative factors were evaluated, along with IPSS, storage symptoms percentage (the total from frequency, urgency and nocturia divided by the total IPSS), bother index, and post void residual (PVR) at 6 weeks, 4 months, and yearly. ResultsTwo hundred sixty-eight patients had a minimum 1 year of follow up and had completed the IPSS. IPSS and bother index improved significantly from preoperatively to all time points post operatively in both groups, but the difference was greater in the GIS group. Patients in the GIS group had significantly larger prostates, more prostatic ingrowth, higher preoperative PVR, and a higher overall IPSS compared to the LIS group. Those in the LIS group had a higher incidence of prior prostate surgery, and a higher BMI. However, storage symptom percentages were equal between the GIS and LIS groups at all time points. ConclusionGreater prostatic ingrowth, larger prostate volume, higher preoperative PVR volume, and a higher overall IPSS was associated with greater improvement in storage symptoms. Prior prostate surgery and higher BMI portend less improvement in storage symptoms.

Research on Applications of Transurethral Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate in Elderly Patients Aged ≥80 Years.

Objective: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKERP) vs. transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in elderly patients aged ≥80 years with benign prostate hyperplasia.Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the PKERP (n = 123) and TURP (n = 143) in patients aged ≥80 years at urology department of The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University from January 2016 to October 2019. Then the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data of different indicators were compared between the two groups. The follow-up was done at 3 months, 1 year after surgical treatment.Results: No significant differences were observed between the two groups for the baseline characteristics, including age, prostate volume, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, concurrent disease, maximum urinary flow rate (MFR), international prostate symptoms score (IPSS), and quality of life (QoL) score. The operative time, hemoglobin decrease, and postoperative flushing time were significantly lower in the PKERP group compared with the TURP group. However, no significant differences were observed between both groups for postoperative hospital stay, incidence of transurethral resection syndrome (TURS), prostatic capsular perforation, and genuine urinary incontinence. The follow-up results showed that the MFR of the PKERP group was significantly higher than the TURP group at 1 year after surgery.Conclusion: Compared with TURP, PKERP is a safe and efficacious method for treating patients aged ≥80 years with benign prostate hyperplasia, and it may improve long-term urination symptoms.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of improved transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate in high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and coronary artery disease.

ObjectiveThis prospective study aimed to evaluate the safety of improved transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (iTUPKEP) in the perioperative period in high-risk patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and coronary artery disease.MethodsPatients with BPH underwent surgical treatment with transurethral vapour resection of the prostate (TUVP) or iTUPKEP. Serum endothelin-1, cardiac troponin-I, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations were evaluated in the short term after surgery. The postvoid residual urine volume, maximum urinary flow rate, international prostate symptom score, and quality of life indicators were evaluated in the long term after surgery.ResultsEndothelin-1 concentrations were lower in the iTUPKEP group than in the TUVP group at 1 and 2 days postoperatively. The iTUPKEP group had lower cardiac troponin-I and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein concentrations at all time points postoperatively. The postvoid residual urine volume, international prostate symptom score, and quality of life values were lower, but the maximum urinary flow rate was higher, in the iTUPKEP group than in the TUVP group.ConclusionsThe iTUPKEP procedure has a smaller effect on vascular endothelial function compared with TUVP. Therefore, iTUPKEP may reduce the incidence of postoperative cardiovascular adverse events in high-risk patients with BPH and coronary artery disease.

Plasma Kinetic Enucleation vs Holmium Laser Enucleation for Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Randomized Controlled Trial with a 3-Year Follow-Up.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) with holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods: A total of 160 patients with indications for the surgical treatment of BPH were randomly assigned to receive either PKEP or HoLEP prospectively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative data, and postoperative outcomes of the patients were recorded. One hundred twenty-six (78.75%) patients (PKEP 64 vs HoLEP 62) completed the 3-year follow-up assessment. Results: Patients in both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Compared with PKEP, HoLEP was associated with shorter operative time as well as take-out time, lower perioperative hemoglobin decrease, and shorter bladder irrigation time, catheterization time, and hospital stay time. PKEP was superior to HoLEP in terms of the noise of the machine and hospitalization expenses. There were no significant differences in enucleating time, resected weight, and serum sodium levels. Both groups achieved satisfactory results and maintained improvement from baseline in terms of maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax), International Prostatic Symptomatic Score, quality of life, and postvoid residual at 3-year follow-up, with no significant differences between the two procedures. Except for re-catheterization rate, postoperative data such as transrectal ultrasound volume, International Index of Erectile Function-5, and follow-up scores of the flexible cystourethroscopy results, as well as the acute and mid-to long-term complications after surgery, were statistically similar. Conclusion: The 3-year follow-up data of this randomized trial confirmed that both PKEP and HoLEP were effective and safe surgical procedures for the transurethral management of BPH. HoLEP presented certain advantages compared to PKEP, such as reduced operative duration, decreased risk of blood loss, and less bladder irrigation, hospital stay time, and re-catheterization rate, whereas PKEP had lower noise and no additional laser cost. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-TRC-13004468).

Bipolar transurethral enucleation of the prostate combined with open cystolithotomy in the treatment of large and giant prostate with bladder stones: Case series.

The surgical management of large or giant prostate still has challenges to urologists, especially if combined with bladder stones, and the traditional techniques by open prostatectomy and cystolithotomy have significant morbidity rates. The endoscopic procedure might not be feasible to treat both conditions in a single procedure, despite advances in surgical techniques and instrumentation, we present a one-session procedure by a combined endoscopic and open approach for treating benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) larger than 100 g combined with bladder stones in the elderly patient with other comorbidities. Between May 2017 and January 2020, bipolar transurethral plasma kinetic enucleation of the prostate (TUEP) followed by open cystolithotomy was performed to six patients at our institution, three of them combined with a big bladder stone(s). All the patients have other chronic chest and heart diseases; we retrospectively collected the data. All the patients diagnosed as BPH of big size or giant prostate over 100 g, with bladder stone, and all the patients treated with the same procedure. We founded that the combination methods showed a significant effect in terms of surgery time, patient outcomes and recovery, hospital discharge. The mean age of patients was 78.16 ± 4.2 (73-84) years, and the mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was 16.27 ± 10.01 (8.32-32.17) ng/mL. The mean size of the prostate measured by MRI/US was 266.16 ± 89.1 (169-405) mL. The mean total operation time was 70.5 ± 10.9 (60-90) min, while the mean enucleation time was 28.38 ± 6.61 (23-40) min. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 193.33 ± 19.66 (170-220) mL. The mean resected prostate weight was 217.166 ± 94.67 (117-365) g. The mean post-operative hospital stay was 2.6 ± 0.81 (2-4) days. One patient was readmitted 2 months later due to urinary tract infection, and one patient complains of urine incontinence who spontaneously subsided in 4 months after surgery, other that no severe postoperative complications observed, a significant reduction of serum PSA and IPSS recorded at 3 months, postoperatively. Although simple open prostatectomy remains the reference standard for the treatment. Of excessively large or giant prostatic hyperplasia, the combination procedure not only facilitates the management of selected cases of hyperplasia but further imparts significant benefits to patients and surgeons alike. This treatment plan is safe, time-consuming, and could revolutionize future treatment approaches to giant prostate.

Transurethral enucleation of the prostate combined with laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy

Objective We present a one-session procedure for treating bladder diverticula combined with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Material and methods Between January 2015 and April 2019, transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (TUEP) followed by laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy (LD) were performed in 12 patients at our institution, in four of them combined with bladder stone(s) and in one patient combined with diverticular tumor. Clinical data were retrospectively collected. Results The mean size of the prostate was 137.3 ± 96.3 (65.5–403.3) ml. The mean maximal diameter of the diverticulum was 8.0 ± 2.7 (3.2–12.0) cm. The mean total operation time was 214.2 ± 69.0 (120–300) min, and the mean enucleation time was 23.2 ± 6.4 (12–35) min. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 52.1 ± 14.9 (30–80) ml. The average pre- and post-operative maximum flow rate was 5.1 ± 1.4 (2.4–8.5) ml/s and 12.8 ± 2.3 (9.6–17.1) ml/s. Except for urinary infection in one patient, no other severe peri- or postoperative complications were observed. Conclusions TUEP accompanied by LD in one session provides an effective and minimally invasive surgical treatment for bladder diverticula combined with BPH, with or without bladder stones, and permits reasonable operation time and rapid discharge.

Comparative Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate and Transurethral Bipolar Plasmakinetic Resection of the Prostate for Massive Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (>80 ml).

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to compare the clinical safety and effectiveness of transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) vs. transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP) in the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) more than 80 ml.Material/MethodsFrom June 2015 to February 2019, 179 BPH patients with prostate volume greater than 80 ml were enrolled and separated into a PKEP (n=81) group and a PKRP group (n=98). The patients in the 2 groups were followed up for 6 months. We collected and analyzed data from the international Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), residual urine volume (RUV), quality of life (QOL), maximum urine flow rate (Qmax), and international erectile function index (ILEF-5). The clinical data collected during and after the operation and surgical complications were compared between the 2 groups.ResultsThe PKEP group had significantly shorter operation time, bladder flushing time, indwelling catheter time, and hospitalization time, and has less intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative secondary hemorrhage, bladder neck contracture, capsule perforation, and retrograde ejaculation (P<0.05). Compared with the PKRP group, the postoperative IPSS and QOL scores were significantly lower in the PKEP group (P<0.05), while the excision glandular tissue weight and Qmax were significantly improved (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in ILEF-5 scores, RUV, urethral stricture, urinary incontinence, or erectile dysfunction between the 2 groups (p>0.05).ConclusionsPKEP treatment of BPH with a large volume (>80 ml) has the advantages of complete gland resection, good surgical effect, improved surgical safety, and reduced intraoperative and postoperative complications.

Predictors Of Postoperative Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Improvements In Patient With Small-Volume Prostate And Bladder Outlet Obstruction.

ObjectiveTo explore the factors associated with improvement of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) after transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in patients with a small-volume prostate and bladder outlet obstruction (BOO).MethodsThe clinicopathologic data of 257 patients with BOO and a small-volume prostate from January 2013 to January 2018 were retrospectively collected preoperatively, 3 months postoperatively, and 12 months postoperatively. Patients were divided into postoperative success and failure groups based on the IPSS, IPSS-v, and IPSS-s. The relationship between each parameter and the improvement of postoperative LUTS was analyzed. Subgroup analysis was performed to compare the differences between the TURP and PKEP groups.ResultsAmong patients followed up for 3 months postoperatively, multivariate analysis demonstrated that IPP, PUA, and post-PCB were significant predictors of postoperative IPSS improvement; TZI, IPP, and PUA were significant predictors of postoperative IPSS-v improvement; post-PCB and the surgical procedure were significant predictors of IPSS-s improvement; and IPP and PUA were significant predictors of postoperative Qmax improvement. Among patients followed up for 12 months postoperatively, multivariate analysis revealed that IPP, PUA, and post-PCB were significant predictors of postoperative IPSS improvement; PUA was a significant predictor of postoperative IPSS-v improvement; post-PCB was a significant predictor of IPSS-s improvement; and IPP and PUA were significant predictors of postoperative Qmax improvement. The post-PCB was significantly lower in the PKEP than the TURP group and the prostatic calculi removal rate was significantly higher in the PKEP than the TURP group.ConclusionPatients with a greater preoperative IPP and PUA and smaller post-PCB showed greater improvement of postoperative LUTS. PKEP might help to remove calculi from between the transitional and peripheral zones of prostate. Compared with conventional TURP, PKEP may improve the early postoperative storage symptoms of LUTS in patients with a small-volume prostate and BOO.

Influence of prostate size on the perioperative and postoperative outcome of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate: Results of 892 patients with 3 years of follow-up

To explore the influence of prostate size on the outcome of Plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PkEP) for the treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH), The data of 892 patients with symptomatic BPH who underwent PkEP were retrospectively reviewed. Among them, 199 (22.31%) had the prostate size smaller than 40 g (Group 1), 409 (45.85%) between 40 and 79 g (Group 2), 197 (22.09%) between 80 and 120 g (Group 3), and 87 (9.75%) larger than 120 g (Group 4). Perioperative variables, perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Patients were followed up for 36 months postoperatively. The efficiency of the surgery increased as the prostate size increased. Greater decreases in hemoglobin were noted in groups with larger prostates, while the duration of catheterization after the operation was similar across all groups. During the 3-year follow-up, the postoperative improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Quality of Life (QOL), maximal flow rate (Qmax) and post-void residual urine volume (PVR), as well as longterm complications including urethral stricture and bladder-neck contracture were comparable across the 4 groups. These findings revealed that PkEP is more efficient for large prostate and can treat all prostates regardless of the size with equivalent symptom relief and micturition improvement.

Bipolar Plasmakinetic Enucleoresection of the Prostate: Our Experience with 245 Patients for 3 Years of Follow-Up.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of bipolar transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP). Between January 2010 and October 2013, 245 patients with lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic hyperplasia underwent transurethral enucleation of prostate using bipolar plasma vaporization energy. Patients were evaluated preoperatively by full detailed history, routine preoperative investigation digital rectal examination, serum prostate-specific antigen, abdominal and transrectal ultrasonography, and maximum flow rates (Qmax). Patients' ages ranged from 50 to 81 (65.5 ± 6) years with transrectal ultrasound-measured prostate volume of 97.1 ± 36.7 mL resulting in an operating time of 76.9 ± 27.9 minutes, and postoperative irrigation and catheterization times were 3.5 ± 3.2 and 12.7 ± 6.1 hours, respectively. No significant complication occurred intra- or postoperatively. Qmax increased from 7.1 ± 3.2 mL/second preoperative to 18.4 ± 4.2 mL/second (p < 0.001). The International Prostate Symptom Score decreased from 25 ± 6 to 7.9 ± 2.4 (p < 0.01). This study confirmed that PKEP is a safe, easy to learn, and durable technique suitable for any prostate sizes.

Older Age and Larger Prostate Volume Are Associated with Stress Urinary Incontinence after Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate.

Background. To investigate the factors associated with the occurrence of and recovery from stress urinary incontinence (SUI) after plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP). Materials and Methods. This retrospective study enrolled 1,288 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia treated with plasmakinetic enucleation from January 2008 to January 2015, collecting demographics and clinical parameters. SUI was defined as a patient complaint of involuntary urine leak, including stress or mixed urinary incontinence. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the factors associated with the occurrence of SUI. Results. SUI after PKEP occurred in 80 of 1,288 patients (6.2%), 73 of whom (91.3%) recovered within 3 months and 78 of whom (97.5%) recovered within 6 months. In multivariate regression analysis of factors that were significant in univariate analysis, the factors that were significantly associated with postoperative SUI were age ≥ 70 years (odds ratio [OR] = 9.239; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.616–18.495; P < 0.001) and prostate volume on transrectal ultrasound ≥ 90 mL (OR = 15.390; 95% CI = 8.077–29.326; P < 0.001). Conclusions. SUI occurred in 6.2% patients after PKEP and was associated with older age and larger prostate volume. We suggest that age and prostate volume be considered in preoperative candidate selection before PKEP to reduce the occurrence of postoperative SUI.

Can the lower urinary tract storage symptoms be completely resolved after plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate?

The aim of this study was to determine whether the lower urinary tract storage symptoms of benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) could be completely resolved after plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) and the possible predictors of persistent symptoms. Two hundred and sixty-seven cases of BPO performed PKEP from July 2008 to June 2009 were retrospectively analyzed. Five-year postoperative data were collected and compared with the preoperative data. According to the urodynamic results, the patients were divided into involuntary detrusor contraction (IDC) group (n = 95) and no IDC group (n = 172) preoperatively; the patients with IDC were divided into IDC-persistent group (n = 33) and IDC-resolved group (n = 62) after PKEP. The predictors of persistent IDC were analyzed. Compared with the preoperative data, the 5-year postoperative data showed that the IDC rate was lower (P = 0.000), Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS) was lower (P = 0.000), maximum cystometric capacity (MCC) was larger (P = 0.000), Prostate volume (PV) was smaller (P = 0.000), and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was lower (P = 0.000). Compared with the no IDC group, the IDC group showed that the age was older (P = 0.016), MCC was smaller (P = 0.004), PSA was higher (P = 0.016), and Chronic Inflammation rate was higher (P = 0.004). Compared with IDC-resolved group after PKEP, IDC-persistent group showed that the age was older (P = 0.019), MCC was smaller (P = 0.000), PSA was higher (P = 0.013), and Chronic Inflammation rate was higher (P = 0.032). The present study shows that the storage symptoms are still needed to be focused on after PKEP. The advanced patient age, MCC, PSA, and chronic inflammation may be the important clinical predictors of persistent IDC.

Curative effect of plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate in the treatment of large volume prostate

Objectives To evaluate the clinical effect of transurethral plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP) in treatment of large volume benign prostatic hyperplasia(BPH) (>80mL). Methods The clinical date of 80 patients with large volume BPH in the hospital from May 2012 to January 2015 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were divided into PKEP group(n=37) and transurethral bipolar plasma kinetic prostatectomy (TUPKP group) (n=43) according to surgical ways. Perioperative indices, postoperative follow-up results of two groups were compared and ana- lysed. Results Bladder washing time (20.5 ± 6.7 )min, blood loss (120.5± 44.9 )mL, indwelling catheter time (4.4 ± 1.9)d, postoperative hospitalization (5.2 ±1.8)d in PKEP group were significantly lower than in TUPKP group and resection of the prostate weight (63.2± 21.5) g was significantly higher than TUPKP group (P 0.05). Qmax (22.4±4.7) mL/s in PKEP group was significantly higher than that in TUPKP group (19.5±4.0) mL/s (P 0.05), and the PSA values of the two groups were significantly decreased (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate (62.16%) in the PKRP group was significantly lower than that in the TUPKP group (86.05%) and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusions PKEP has good clinical effect in the treatment of large volume BPH and TUPKP, it has the advantages of less bleeding, quick recovery and low complications. Key words: Prostatic Hyperplasia; Transurethral Resection of Prostate

The impact of surgical treatments for lower urinary tract symptoms/benign prostatic hyperplasia on male erectile function

Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS)/benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is common in adult men and can impair erectile function (EF). It was believed surgical treatments for this illness can improve EF due to the relief of LUTS while they were also reported harmed EF as heating or injury effect. Current network meta-analysis aimed to elucidate this discrepancy.Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. Direct comparisons were conducted by STATA and network meta-analysis was conducted by Generate Mixed Treatment Comparison. Random-effects models were used to calculate pooled standard mean difference and 95% confidence intervals and to incorporate variation between studies.Eighteen RCTs with 2433 participants were analyzed. Nine approaches were studied as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), plasmakinetic resection of the prostate (PKRP), plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP), Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP), Holmium laser resection of the prostate (HoLRP), photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP), Thulium laser, open prostatectomy (OP), and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (LSP). In direct comparisons, all surgical treatments did not decrease postoperative International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF)-5 score except PVP. Moreover, patients who underwent HoLEP, PKEP, Thulium laser, and TURP had their postoperative EF significantly increased. Network analysis including direct and indirect comparisons ranked LSP at the highest position on the variation of postoperative IIEF-5 score, followed by PKRP, HoLEP, TURP, Thulium laser, PKEP, PVP, HoLRP, and OP. In subgroup analysis, only PVP was found lower postoperative EF in the short term and decreased baseline group, whereas TURP increased postoperative IIEF-5 score only for patients with normal baseline EF. However, HoLEP and PKEP showed pro-erectile effect even for patients with decreased baseline EF and short-term follow-up. Our novel data demonstrating surgical treatments for LUTS/BPH showed no negative impact on postoperative EF except PVP. Moreover, HoLEP and PKEP were found pro-erectile effect for all subgroups. New technologies, such as LSP, PKRP, and Thulium laser, were ranked at top positions in the network analysis, although they had no pro-erectile effect in direct comparison due to limited original studies or poor baseline EF. Therefore, further studies and longer follow-up are required to substantiate our findings.

Thulium Laser Enucleation Versus Plasmakinetic Enucleation of the Prostate: A Randomized Trial of a Single Center.

To compare the safety and efficacy of thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP) with plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP). A total of 127 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were randomized to either ThuLEP (n = 61) or PKEP (n = 66). All patients were assessed preoperatively and followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Baseline characteristics of the patients, perioperative data, postoperative outcomes, and complications were recorded. The decrease in hemoglobin level and the catheter time were statistically significantly lower in the ThuLEP group compared with the PKEP group (0.80 ± 0.49 vs 0.99 ± 0.52, p = 0.037, and 1.85 ± 0.94 vs 2.28 ± 1.34, p = 0.042). There were no statistical differences in complications between the two groups (p > 0.05). There was a significant improvement in 3, 6, and 12 months' parameters compared with preoperative values (p < 0.001). Assessment at the 12-month follow-up showed no difference in urinary parameters between the two groups. ThuLEP and PKEP are both safe and efficient procedures for the treatment of patients with BPH. Compared with PKEP, ThuLEP provided less risk of hemorrhage and shorter catheter time, although the differences may be of little clinical relevance. Further well-designed trials with extended follow-up and larger sample size are needed to draw final conclusions about the efficacy of the two procedures.

Did prostate size affect the complication and outcome of plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate?

To evaluate surgical complications and outcomes based on prostate size in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with plasmakinetic enucleation of the prostate (PKEP). A retrospective review was conducted of PKEP performed between July 2008 and January 2013. According to the prostate size on preoperative transrectal ultrasonography measurement, patients were divided into three groups: group 1: <40 ml, group 2: 40-80 ml and group 3: >80 ml. Baseline, perioperative and postoperative data were obtained. There were significant differences among the three groups regarding the mean operative time (p < 0.001) and the mean resected tissue weight (p < 0.001). But enucleation efficiency (p < 0.001) in gm tissue per minute increased significantly as prostate size increased. Mean hemoglobin decrease (p > 0.05), mean postoperative irrigation time (p > 0.05), mean catheter time (p > 0.05) and mean hospital stay (p > 0.05) did not differ significantly among three groups. The three groups had a similar and significant postoperative improvement in International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, maximum uroflow rate and post-void residual urine volume independent of prostate size (p < 0.001), but no significant difference was found among three groups at the 12-month follow-up (p > 0.05). Perioperative and postoperative complications did not depend on prostate size (p > 0.05). Although patients with a larger BPH required significantly longer operation time in PKEP, prostate size did not affect perioperative and postoperative complications or micturition improvement.