Plasma Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Research Articles

Updated overall survival and ctDNA analysis in patients with EGFR T790M-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with lazertinib in the phase 1/2 LASER201 study.

Lazertinib is a potent, irreversible, third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with significant efficacy in patients with EGFR T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This is the final overall survival (OS) report from the phase 1/2 LASER201 study in patients with advanced NSCLC with disease progression on or after prior EGFR TKI therapy. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 20years, with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC and previous therapy with EGFR TKI. Patients in this integrated analysis received oral lazertinib 240mg/day. Endpoints included efficacy and safety; exploratory analyses included associations between circulating EGFR-mutant tumor DNA (ctDNA) and efficacy parameters. This integrated analysis included 78 patients in Korea who received second- or later-line lazertinib. The median OS was 38.9months; estimated survival rates at 12, 24, and 36months were 89.5%, 73.9%, and 52.8%, respectively. The cumulative 12-month incidence of central nervous system progression was 9.4%. EGFR-mutant ctDNA was detected in 46 patients (62.2%) at baseline. The presence of ctDNA at baseline significantly predicted progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR), and OS. PFS, response rate, and DCR were significantly associated with EGFR-mutant ctDNA clearance at cycle 3; PFS and OS were significantly associated with ctDNA clearance at cycle 5. The safety profile of lazertinib 240mg/day was consistent with previous findings. Lazertinib is a promising treatment option for patients with EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC following disease progression on prior EGFR-directed TKIs. Patients in LASER201 experienced prolonged OS, regardless of their EGFR mutation, brain metastases, or prior brain radiation status. Clearance of plasma EGFR mutations after lazertinib was associated with patient outcomes. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03046992.

Plasma EGFR mutation ctDNA dynamics in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with Icotinib: phase 2 multicenter trial result

Plasma epidermal growth factor receptor mutation (EGFRm) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) dynamics exhibit promise in predicting outcomes in patients with EGFRm-advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, there remains limited trial-level data on integrating ctDNA monitoring into clinical practice. We performed a prospective, multicenter trial to investigate the relationship between EGFRm ctDNA dynamic changes and clinical outcomes in NSCLC patients with EGFRm. Ninety-eight treatment-naive EGFRm-advanced NSCLC patients were recruited and administered icotinib until disease progression. Plasma samples were collected at baseline and four weeks after icotinib administration. ctDNA was analyzed using a droplet-digital polymerase chain reaction. At baseline, 71.4% of patients had detectable EGFRm ctDNA. Among them, 45.9% of patients’ ctDNA became undetectable within four weeks of treatment. These patients demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those with detectable ctDNA after treatment (P = 0.004 and < 0.001, respectively) and were comparable to those with undetectable ctDNA at both baseline and four weeks. ctDNA detectable at four weeks emerged as a poor independent risk factor for PFS and OS. Patients whose ctDNA became undetectable after treatment had outcomes similar to those with initially undetectable ctDNA, underscoring the predictive value of ctDNA dynamics in treatment efficacy.Registry and the Registration No. of the study/trial: ChiCTR-DDD-17013131. Date of registration: 2017-10-27.

Abstract 6504: Exploratory analysis using serial cell-free DNA in patients treated with amivantamab in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

Abstract Introduction: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20 ins) mutation showed limited clinical activity with conventional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Amivantamab is the first bispecific antibody to be approved for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR ex20ins mutation. However, limited data is available in terms of predictive biomarkers and the resistance mechanism. In this study, we conducted an exploratory analysis to elucidate a genomic landscape using circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma samples. Patients and Methods: This study include result from 79 blood samples, which has been prospectively collected from 27 EGFR ex20ins mutated NSCLC patients (confirmed by either tissue or plasma-based test) who were treated with amivantamab. ctDNAs were obtained from plasma, which was serially collected at baseline, after 2 cycles of treatment, 2 cycles prior to the treatment discontinuation, and at the time point of disease progression. Guardant OMNI panel (Guardant Health, CA, USA) was used for the genomic profiling. Results: The median follow-up duration was 5.8 months (range 2.7-12.7). The overall response rate was 40.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.5-59.2, n=11), and median progression-free survival was 5.8 months (95% CI 3.9-15.9) with a median duration of response of 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.3-NA). Patients with EGFR ex20ins not detected from ctDNA at baseline (n=10) showed significantly longer PFS compared to patients with EGFR ex20ins identified at baseline plasma sample (n=17) (14.6 vs 3.9 months; hazard ratio [HR] 0.40, 95% CI 0.17-0.95, P&amp;lt;0.05).The most common concurrent somatic variations at baseline were TP53 (62.9%), TERT (18.5%), ATM (18.5%). Longer median PFS was observed in patients without EGFR amplification (n=18) compared to patients with concurrent EGFR amplification (n=9) (11.1 vs. 2.5 months; HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.77, P &amp;lt;0.05). The presence of plasma EGFR ex20ins at C2D15 predicted poor PFS (17.8 vs 2.7 months; HR 0.17, 95% CI 0.06-0.47, P &amp;lt;0.01), regardless of baseline its presence or absence. Based on the paired analysis using baseline and at the timepoint of disease progression, putative resistance mechanism to amivantamab was identified in 14 patients (60.8%), which were PDGFRB (28.5%), followed by PTEN (21.4%), CHEK2 (21.4%). Conclusions: This study provides a comprehensive longitudinal ctDNA analysis in patients with EGFR ex20ins mutant NSCLC who were treated with amivantamab. Our results suggested that the presence of ctDNA for EGFR ex20ins mutation and co-alteration with EGFR amplification at baseline might be related to the clinical outcomes of amivantamab. Citation Format: Geun-Ho Park, Sehhoon Park, Hyen-Ae Jung, Jong-Mu Sun, Jin Seok Ahn, Myung-Ju Ahn, Se-Hoon Lee. Exploratory analysis using serial cell-free DNA in patients treated with amivantamab in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6504.

Correlation analysis of EGFR gene mutation abundance and the efficacy of targeted therapy with osimertinib in nonsmall cell lung cancer-a case control study.

In nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is the primary cancer-causing mutation. But whether the practical effectiveness of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be influenced by plasma EGFR mutation abundance when treating patients with advanced NSCLC remains unanswered. Therefore, this research was intended to reveal the connection between plasma EGFR mutation abundance and clinical outcomes in osimertinib-treated patients with advanced NSCLC. A total of 120 patients with advanced NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed, and 56 patients with EGFR-mutation-positive NSCLC receiving osimertinib first-line therapy were eventually screened and included. The baseline status and abundance of plasma EGFR in patients with NSCLC were detected by cSMART, and the ratio of 0.1 was the critical value. Imaging examinations were performed every 8-12 weeks for the assessment of tumor response. The relationship between baseline EGFR mutation abundance and clinical outcomes of TKI therapy was analyzed. The objective response rates (ORR) of EGFR-mutant patients in the high-/low-abundance groups were 69.2% and 40.0%, respectively. The high abundance group had an obviously higher ORR than the low abundance group (P = 0.029). A much longer median progression-free survival (mPFS) was demonstrated in patients with high mutation abundance than in patients with low abundance (11.2 months vs 7.1 months, P = 0.0133). As for the median overall survival (mOS), it showed the same trend as mPFS in patients from different groups (15.5 vs 10.7 months, P = 0.0028). The role of plasma mutation abundance as an independent prognostic factor for both PFS (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.30, P = 0.006) and OS (HR: 0.35, P = 0.004) was demonstrated by multivariate Cox regression analysis. There is a close connection between plasma EGFR mutation abundance and survival benefit in patients with NSCLC, which can be used for predicting the efficacy of EGFR-TKI targeted therapy. Our study is expected to provide a research basis for screening patients to whom the EGFR-TKI therapy is beneficial.

Monitoring of Plasma EGFR Mutations during Osimertinib Treatment for NSCLC Patients with Acquired T790M Mutation.

Osimertinib was first approved for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in patients who have developed the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation after treatment with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We routinely evaluated the plasma of NSCLC patients with the T790M mutation to more rapidly detect an increase in disease activity and resistance to treatment. Eligible patients received osimertinib after resistance to the first- or second-generation of EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC harboring T790M mutation detectable in tumor tissue or plasma. Plasma samples were collected every 8 weeks during osimertinib treatment. The plasma analysis was performed using an improved PNA-LNA PCR clamp method. We tested samples for a resistance mechanism, including EGFR-activating, T790M, and C797S mutations, and assessed the association between the mutations and osimertinib treatment. Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 58 were eligible for this analysis. In plasma collected before osimertinib treatment, activating mutations were detected in 47 of 58 patients (81.0%) and T790M was detected in 44 patients (75.9%). Activating mutations were cleared in 60.9% (28/46) and T790M was cleared in 93.0% (40/43). Of these, 71.4% (20/28) of activating mutations and 87.5% (35/40) of T790M mutation were cleared within 8 weeks of treatment. The total response rate (RR) was 53.4% (31/58). The median duration of treatment was 259 days, with a trend toward longer treatment duration in patients who experienced the clearance of activating mutations with osimertinib. At the time of disease progression during osimertinib treatment, C797S was detected in 3 of 37 patients (8.1%). Plasma EGFR mutation analysis was effective in predicting the effect of osimertinib treatment.

Early Clearance of Plasma Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutations as a Predictor of Outcome on Osimertinib in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer; Exploratory Analysis from AURA3 and FLAURA.

Plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis is used for genotyping advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); monitoring dynamic ctDNA changes may be used to predict outcomes. This was a retrospective, exploratory analysis of two phase III trials [AURA3 (NCT02151981), FLAURA (NCT02296125)]. All patients had EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm; ex19del or L858R) advanced NSCLC; AURA3 also included T790M-positive NSCLC. Osimertinib (FLAURA, AURA3), or comparator EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI; gefitinib/erlotinib; FLAURA), or platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (AURA3) was given. Plasma EGFRm was analyzed at baseline and Weeks 3/6 by droplet digital PCR. Outcomes were assessed by detectable/non-detectable baseline plasma EGFRm and plasma EGFRm clearance (non-detection) at Weeks 3/6. In AURA3 (n = 291), non-detectable versus detectable baseline plasma EGFRm had longer median progression-free survival [mPFS; HR, 0.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.33-0.68; P < 0.0001]. In patients with Week 3 clearance versus non-clearance (n = 184), respectively, mPFS (months; 95% CI) was 10.9 (8.3-12.6) versus 5.7 (4.1-9.7) with osimertinib and 6.2 (4.0-9.7) versus 4.2 (4.0-5.1) with platinum-pemetrexed. In FLAURA (n = 499), mPFS was longer with non-detectable versus detectable baseline plasma EGFRm (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.41-0.70; P < 0.0001). For Week 3 clearance versus non-clearance (n = 334), respectively, mPFS was 19.8 (15.1 to not calculable) versus 11.3 (9.5-16.5) with osimertinib and 10.8 (9.7-11.1) versus 7.0 (5.6-8.3) with comparator EGFR-TKI. Similar outcomes were observed by Week 6 clearance/non-clearance. Plasma EGFRm analysis as early as 3 weeks on-treatment has the potential to predict outcomes in EGFRm advanced NSCLC.

First report of ELUCIDATOR study: A prospective observational multicenter study on resistance mechanisms in patients with early disease progression during osimertinib.

3032 Background: Osimertinib (Osi) is the key standard therapy for patients (pts) with chemo-naive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR) mutations. However, many of cases treated with Osi experience the disease progression (PD). Therefore, understanding first-line osimertinib resistance mechanisms is essential for future therapeutic strategies. Here, we addressed the underlying mechanisms of resistance to Osi using paired plasma DNA samples and particularly focused on early PD (PD within 6 months) cases. Methods: This trial is the multicenter prospective research, and we prospectively collected plasma DNA samples prior Osi treatment and at PD. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) implemented with the molecular barcoding method was performed to analyze gene mutations in 197 cancer-associated genes. Then using these ct-DNA, we analyzed the Osi resistance by ultra-sensitive NGS. In this interim analysis, we specially analyze the early PD (PD within 6 months) cases. Results: One hundred eighty-eight pts were enrolled between May 2019 and January 2021. Among these pts, 125 (66%) pts were female, 96 (51%) were EGFR exon 19 deletion mutation, and 109 (58%) were never smoker. Seventy-eight pts experienced PD and 36 pts experienced early PD at interim analysis. Baseline shedders, patients with plasma positivity for EGFR-activating mutation were more frequently observed in early PD pts than non-PD (86.1% vs 63.4%, p = 0.009). Early PD patients had significantly more co-occurring gene mutations along with EGFR mutations than non-early PD patients (2.89±1.49 vs 1.97±1.37, p = 0.002). Most notably, 3 among 36 early PD pts and 8 among 78 PD pts had significant reduction of plasma EGFR mutant allele frequency at PD than that at baseline. Among those, 1 had germline BRCA1 mutation and 1 had BRINP3 mutation in 3 early PD pts, and 1 had germline BRCA2 mutation, and 1 had germline TP53 mutation in 5 PD pts excluding early PD pts. Co-occurring TP53 mutations were not relevant to early PD in this study cohort. Conclusions: Germline mutations in BRCA1/2, TP53 and BRINP3 may confer early and unprecedented resistance to Osi monotherapy. Plasma-based serial comprehensive gene profiling may help predict and identify patients unlikely to benefit from Osi treatment, though further study is warranted. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180051 .

The diagnostic significance of cerebrospinal fluid cytology and circulating tumor DNA in meningeal carcinomatosis.

The objective of this research is to investigate the clinical application value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) cytology and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) meningeal metastasis-meningeal carcinomatosis (MC), and to further explore the possible molecular mechanisms and drug treatment targets of LUAD meningeal metastasis by next-generation sequencing (NGS). We retrospectively analyzed LUAD with MC in 52 patients. CSF cytology was carried out using the slide centrifugation precipitation method and May-Grüwald-Giemsa (MGG) staining. Tumor tissue, plasma and CSF ctDNA of some MC patients were detected by NGS. Of the 52 MC patients, 46 (88.46%) were positive for CSF cytology and 34 (65.38%) were positive for imaging, with statistically significant differences in diagnostic positivity (P < 0.05). In 32 of these patients, CSF cytology, cerebrospinal fluid ctDNA, plasma ctDNA and MRI examination were performed simultaneously, and the positive rates were 84.38, 100, 56.25, and 62.50% respectively, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Analysis of the NGS profiles of tumor tissues, plasma and CSF of 12 MC patients: the mutated gene with the highest detection rate was epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the detection rate were 100, 58.33, and 100% respectively in tumor tissues, plasma and CSF, and there were 6 cases of concordance between plasma and tissue EGFR mutation sites, with a concordance rate of 50.00%, and 12 cases of concordance between CSF and tissue EGFR mutation sites, with a concordance rate of 100%. In addition, mutations not found in tissue or plasma were detected in CSF: FH mutation, SETD2 mutation, WT1 mutation, CDKN2A mutation, CDKN2B mutation, and multiple copy number variants (CNV), with the most detected being CDKN2A mutation and MET amplification. CSF cytology is more sensitive than traditional imaging in the diagnosis of meningeal carcinomatosis and has significant advantages in the early screening and diagnosis of MC patients. CSF ctDNA can be used as a complementary diagnostic method to negative results of CSF cytology and MRI, and CSF ctDNA can be used as an important method for liquid biopsy of patients with MC, which has important clinical significance in revealing the possible molecular mechanisms and drug treatment targets of meningeal metastasis of LUAD.

Osimertinib treatment based on plasma T790M monitoring in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): EORTC Lung Cancer Group 1613 APPLE phase II randomized clinical trial

The APPLE trial aimed to evaluate the feasibility of longitudinal plasma epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M monitoring for the best sequencing strategy of gefitinib and osimertinib. APPLE is a randomized, non-comparative, phase II study in patients with common EGFR-mutant, treatment-naive non-small-cell lung cancer including three arms: arm A (osimertinib upfront until RECIST progression, PD), arm B [gefitinib until emergence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) EGFR T790M mutation by cobas EGFR test v2 or RECIST PD], and arm C (gefitinib until RECIST PD), and then switch to osimertinib in both arms. The primary endpoint is the progression-free survival (PFS) rate 'on osimertinib' at 18 months (PFSR-OSI-18) after randomization in arm B (H0: PFSR-OSI-18 of ≤40%). Secondary endpoints include response rate, overall survival (OS), and brain PFS. We report the results of arms B and C. From November 2017 to February 2020, 52 and 51 patients were randomized into arms B and C, respectively. Most patients were females (70%) and had EGFR Del19 (65%); one-third had baseline brain metastases. In arm B, 17% of patients (8/47) switched to osimertinib based on the emergence of ctDNA T790M mutation before RECIST PD, with a median time to molecular PD of 266 days. The study met its primary endpoint of PFSR-OSI-18 of 67.2% (84% confidence interval 56.4% to 75.9%) in arm B versus 53.5% (84% confidence interval 42.3% to 63.5%) in arm C, with a median PFS of 22.0 months versus 20.2 months, respectively. The median OS was not reached in arm B versus 42.8 months in arm C. Median brain PFS in arms B and C was 24.4 and 21.4 months, respectively. The serial monitoring of ctDNA T790M status in advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer during treatment with first-generation EGFR inhibitors was feasible, and a molecular progression before RECIST PD led to an earlier switch to osimertinib in 17% of patients with satisfactory PFS and OS outcomes.

Comparative analysis of QS3D versus droplet digital PCR for quantitative measures of EGFR T790M mutation from identical plasma

ObjectivesThe capacity of QuantStudio™ 3D (QS3D) and droplet digital PCR (dPCR) for the detection of plasma Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations have been widely reported. Few comparative studies on the quantitative test of the identical DNA material, however, are carried out. Here we compared the performance of the two methods in detecting EGFR T790M mutation in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from the same lung cancer patients. MethodsWe recruited 72 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who initially respond to tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment but subsequently developed resistance. Two tubes of 10mL anticoagulant blood were collected and cfDNA was isolated from plasma. Identical cfDNA samples were analyzed for T790M mutation using QS3D and droplet dPCR in parallel. ResultsT790M mutation was detected in 15 and 21 cfDNA samples by QS3D and droplet digital PCR, respectively. The 6 discordant samples showed low mutation abundance (∼0.1%) and the discrepancy is caused by the stricter threshold settings for QS3D dPCR. The overall agreement between the two methods was 91.7% (66/72). The median allele frequencies for QS3D dPCR and droplet dPCR to detect T790M mutation was 2.01% and 2.62%, respectively. There was no significance in mutation abundance detected by both methods. Both methods are highly correlated with allele frequencies and copy numbers in T790M wild type and mutant, with R2 of 0.98, 0.92 and 0.95, respectively. ConclusionOur study demonstrated that QS3D dPCR are highly consistent with droplet PCR for quantitative determination of EGFR T790M mutation in plasma cfDNA.

59P Clinical utility of plasma cell-free DNA EGFR mutation analysis in treatment-naïve stage IV non-small cell lung cancer patients

Plasma cell-free DNA epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used at initial diagnosis and at progression in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed the factors associated with plasma EGFR mutation detection and the effect of plasma EGFR genotyping on the clinical outcomes of the patients with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC. In this retrospective cohort study, we included subjects with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC who underwent plasma EGFR genotyping between 2018 and 2020. The presence of plasma EGFR mutation was determined by real-time polymeric chain reaction. The prevalence of EGFR mutation in this cohort was 52.7% (164/311). Among 164 EGFR mutant subjects, 34 (20.7%) were positive for the plasma EGFR mutation assay only. The diagnostic sensitivity of the plasma EGFR mutation assay (80.5%) was similar to that of the tissue EGFR mutation assay (79.3%, p = 0.787). In multivariable analysis, the detection of plasma EGFR mutation was significantly related to higher serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, never-smoker status, N3 stage, and brain or intrathoracic metastasis. The time to treatment initiation (TTI) of the plasma EGFR mutation-positive group (14 days) was shorter than that of the plasma EGFR mutation-negative group (21 days, p < 0.001). More patients received the 1st line EGFR-TKI in the plasma positive group compared with the tissue positive group. Smoking status and the factors reflecting tumor burden were associated with detection of plasma EGFR mutation. The plasma EGFR mutation assay can shorten the TTI, and facilitate the 1st line EGFR-TKI therapy for patients with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC, especially in the region of high-prevalence of EGFR mutation.

Clinical Practice Guidelines for Pre-Analytical Procedures of Plasma Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Variant Testing.

Standardization of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing processes is necessary to obtain clinically reliable results. The pre-analytical phase of cfDNA testing greatly influences the results because of the low proportion and stability of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). In this review, we provide evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for pre-analytical phase procedures of plasma epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) variant testing. Specific recommendations for pre-analytical procedures were proposed based on evidence from the literature and our experimental data. Standardization of pre-analytical procedures can improve the analytical performance of cfDNA testing.

Clinical Utility of Plasma Cell-Free DNA EGFR Mutation Analysis in Treatment-Naïve Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Background: Plasma cell-free Deoxyribo nucleic acid epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation tests are widely used at initial diagnosis and at progression in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed the factors associated with plasma EGFR mutation detection and the effect of plasma EGFR genotyping on the clinical outcomes of the patients with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included subjects with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC who underwent plasma EGFR genotyping between 2018 and 2020. The presence of plasma EGFR mutation was determined by real-time polymeric chain reaction. Results: The prevalence of EGFR mutation in this cohort was 52.7% (164/311). Among 164 EGFR mutant subjects, 34 (20.7%) were positive for the plasma EGFR mutation assay only. In multivariable analysis, the detection of plasma EGFR mutation was significantly related to higher serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels, never-smoker status, N3 stage, and brain or intrathoracic metastasis. The time to treatment initiation (TTI) of the plasma EGFR mutation-positive group (14 days) was shorter than that of the plasma EGFR mutation-negative group (21 days, p < 0.001). More patients received the 1st line EGFR-TKI in the plasma positive group compared with the tissue positive group. Conclusion: Smoking status and the factors reflecting tumor burden were associated with the detection of plasma EGFR mutation. The plasma EGFR mutation assay can shorten the TTI, and facilitate the 1st line EGFR-TKI therapy for patients with treatment-naïve stage IV NSCLC, especially in the region of high-prevalence of EGFR mutation.

Evaluation of molecular methods for plasma detection of EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer.

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are detected in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and associated with responses to therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We compared the analytical performances of two real-time PCRs and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) to detect EGFR mutations using plasma. Plasma EGFR tests were performed using 86 plasma samples from 75 prospectively enrolled NSCLC patients with early and advanced stages. Analytical performances of plasma-using two real-time PCR, Cobas EGFR mutation v2 and PANAMutyper, EGFR kit, and ddPCR were evaluated based on the tissue EGFR test results. The frequencies of EGFR mutations and acquired T790M mutation after TKI therapy were also assessed. The incidence of all EGFR mutations was 52.3% (23/44) in tissue and was up to 43.2% (19/44) in plasma. The Cobas detection rates of three EGFR mutations (exon 19 deletions, L858R, and T790M) in plasma were similar to those in tissue. The Cobas showed a higher detection rate (76.7%) than that by the PANAMutyper (60.5%). Sensitivity for T790M mutation was lower than the sensitivity for the exon 19 deletions or L858R in both tests. Mutant allele frequency measured by ddPCR was significantly correlated with the semi-quantitative values of the Cobas. Plasma EGFR tests showed similar detection rates for common EGFR mutations compared to the tissue EGFR tests. Cobas showed higher sensitivity in detection of EGFR mutations in body fluids than the PANAMutyper. Real-time PCR using plasma or body fluids could be a suitable first test for the detection of EGFR mutations.

Osimertinib in poor performance status patients with T790M-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer after progression of first- and second-generation EGFR-TKI treatments (NEJ032B)

BackgroundOsimertinib is effective in patients with T790M mutation-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, its effectiveness and safety in patients with poor performance status (PS) are unknown.MethodsEnrolled patients showed disease progression after treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib, or afatinib; T790M mutation; stage IIIB, IV, or recurrent disease; and PS of 2–4. Osimertinib was orally administered at a dose of 80 mg/day. The primary endpoint of this phase II study (registration, jRCTs061180018) was response rate and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and safety.ResultsThirty-three patients were enrolled, of which 69.7% and 24.2% had PS of 2 and 3, respectively. One patient was excluded due to protocol violation; in the remaining 32 patients, the response rate was 53.1%; disease control rate was 75.0%; PFS was 5.1 months; and OS was 10.0 months. The most frequent adverse event of grade 3 or higher severity was lymphopenia (12.1%). Interstitial lung disease (ILD) was observed at all grades and at grades 3–5 in 15.2% (5/33) and 6.1% (2/33) of patients, respectively. Treatment-related death due to ILD occurred in one patient. Patients negative for activating EGFR mutations after osimertinib administration had longer median PFS than those positive for these mutations.ConclusionOsimertinib was sufficiently effective in EGFR-TKI-resistant, poor PS patients with T790M mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Plasma EGFR mutation clearance after TKI treatment could predict the response to EGFR-TKIs.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Gene Polymorphism May be a Modifier for Cadmium Kidney Toxicity.

The results of many studies indicate that cadmium (Cd) exposure is harmful to humans, with the proximal tubule of the kidney being the main target of Cd accumulation and toxicity. Studies have also shown that Cd has the effect of activating the pathway of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and cell growth. The EGFR is a family of transmembrane receptors, which are widely expressed in the human kidney. The aim of this study was to investigate the kidney function estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and its relationship with plasma Cd level and EGFR gene polymorphism. Using data from Academia Sinica Taiwan biobank, 489 subjects aged 30–70 years were analyzed. The demographic characteristics was determined from questionnaires, and biological sampling of urine and blood was determined from physical examination. Kidney function was assessed by the eGFR with CKD-EPI formula. Plasma Cd (ug/L) was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. A total of 97 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified in the EGFR on the Taiwan biobank chip, however 4 SNPs did not pass the quality control. Multiple regression analyses were performed to achieve the study aim. The mean (±SD) plasma Cd level of the study subjects was 0.02 (±0.008) ug/L. After adjusting for confounding variables, rs13244925 AA, rs6948867 AA, rs35891645 TT and rs6593214 AA types had higher eGFR (4.89 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.035), 5.54 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.03), 4.96 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.048) and 5.16 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p = 0.048), respectively). Plasma cadmium and rs845555 had an interactive effect on eGFR. In conclusion, EGFR polymorphisms could be modifiers of Cd kidney toxicity, in which rs13244925 AA, rs6948867 AA, rs35891645 TT and rs6593214 AA may be protective, and Cd interacting with rs845555 may affect kidney function.

Detection of EGFR mutations in liquid biopsy samples using allele-specific quantitative PCR: A comparative real-world evaluation of two popular diagnostic systems

PurposeThe detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an auxiliary tool for the molecular diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially when an adequate tumor tissue specimen cannot be obtained. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of two commonly used in vitro diagnostic-certified allele-specific quantitative PCR assays for detecting plasma cfDNA EGFR mutations. MethodsWe analyzed EGFR mutations in plasma cfDNA from 90 NSCLC patients (stages I–IV) before treatment (n ​= ​60) and after clinical progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n ​= ​30) using the cobas EGFR mutation test v2 (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.) and therascreen EGFR Plasma RGQ PCR kit (Qiagen GmbH). ResultsThere was higher concordance between plasma cfDNA and matched tumor tissue EGFR mutations with cobas (66.67%) compared with therascreen (55.93%). The concordance rate increased to 90.00% with cobas (Cohen's kappa coefficient, κ ​= ​0.80; p ​< ​0.0001) and 73.33% with therascreen (κ ​= ​0.49; p ​= ​0.0009) in advanced NSCLC patients. In treatment-naïve patients, cobas was superior to therascreen (sensitivity: 82.35% vs. 52.94%; specificity: 100% vs. 100%). In patients with clinical progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR exon 20 p.T790M was detected in 30% and 23% of cfDNA samples by cobas and therascreen, respectively. ConclusionsCobas was superior to therascreen for detection of plasma EGFR mutations in advanced NSCLC. Plasma cfDNA EGFR mutation analysis is complex; therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of commercially available assays should be validated.

Somatic Copy-Number Alterations in Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA from Advanced EGFR-Mutated Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.

Background: To assess the clinical relevance of genome-wide somatic copy-number alterations (SCNAs) in plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients. Methods: We included 43 patients with advanced EGFR T790M-positive lung adenocarcinoma who were treated with osimertinib after progression under previous EGFR-TKI therapy. We performed genomic profiling of ctDNA in plasma samples from each patient obtained pre-osimertinib and after patients developed resistance to osimertinib. SCNAs were detected by shallow whole-genome plasma sequencing and EGFR mutations were assessed by droplet digital PCR. Results: SCNAs in resistance-related genes (rrSCNAs) were detected in 10 out of 31 (32%) evaluable patients before start of osimertinib. The presence of rrSCNAs in plasma before the initiation of osimertinib therapy was associated with a lower response rate to osimertinib (50% versus 81%, p = 0.08) and was an independent predictor for shorter progression-free survival (adjusted HR 3.33, 95% CI 1.37–8.10, p = 0.008) and overall survival (adjusted HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.09–5.92, p = 0.03). Conclusions: Genomic profiling of plasma ctDNA is clinically relevant and affects the efficacy and clinical outcome of osimertinib. Our approach enables the comprehensive assessment of SCNAs in plasma samples of lung adenocarcinoma patients and may help to guide genotype-specific therapeutic strategies in the future.

Plasma EGFR mutation abundance affects clinical response to first-line EGFR-TKIs in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundActivated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation is the main pathogenic cause of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in Asia. However, the impact of plasma EGFR mutation abundance, especially of the ultra-low abundance of EGFR mutation detected by highly sensitive techniques on clinical outcomes of first-line EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for advanced NSCLC patients remains unclear.MethodsWe qualitatively detected baseline EGFR status of NSCLC tissues using amplification-refractory mutation system and quantified the plasma abundance of EGFR mutations through next-generation sequencing (NGS). Every 8–12 weeks, we performed dynamic detection of plasma mutation abundance and imaging evaluation. We analyzed the association between plasma abundance of EGFR sensitizing mutations, tumor size, tumor shrinkage percentage, concomitant TP53 mutations, and clinical response to TKIs.ResultsThis prospective study enrolled 135 patients with advanced NSCLC. The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) for EGFR mutation–positive patients were 50.0% and 87.0%, respectively. When the cutoff value of plasma EGFR mutation abundance was 0.1%, the ORRs of TKI-treated patients were significantly different (60.0% for the >0.1% group vs. 21.4% for the ≤0.1% group, P=0.028). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer for participants with a mutation abundance above 0.1% compared to those with a 0.01–0.1% abundance (log rank, P=0.0115). There was no significant association between plasma abundance of EGFR sensitizing mutations and tumor size, tumor shrinkage percentage, or concomitant TP53 mutations. Cox multivariate analysis demonstrated that plasma mutation abundance was an independent predictive factor for PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 2.41, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.12–5.20; P=0.025]. We identified 11 participants with the acquired T790M resistance mutation according to serial dynamic plasma samples.ConclusionsLiquid biopsy screening based on highly sensitive NGS is reliable for detecting drug resistance and actionable somatic mutations. The plasma abundance of the EGFR driver mutation affected clinical response to EGFR-TKIs in advanced NSCLC patients; prolongation of PFS was also observed in patients with an ultra-low abundance of EGFR sensitizing mutations.

Clinical utility of plasma EGFR mutation detection with quantitative PCR in advanced lung cancer: A meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo assess the clinical utility of quantitative PCR (qPCR) assays, a routinely used test for detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in treatment-naive advanced lung cancer patients. Materials and MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with individual patient data. Eligible RCTs compared EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) and chemotherapy in first line setting for advanced lung cancer, and included tumour EGFR+ (tEGFR+) with paired ctDNA results using real-time (quantitative) PCR. We assessed the proportion of tEGFR + detected by ctDNA, and compared the effectiveness of EGFR-TKI versus chemotherapy in ctDNA + and ctDNA- subgroups. ResultsSix randomized clinical trials included 1058 tEGFR + patients with paired baseline EGFR ctDNA testing. Of these, 460 (43 %) tested ctDNA- (ctDNA+ 57 %). Progression-free survival was longer for EGFR-TKI versus chemotherapy for both ctDNA+ (HR 0.28; 95 % CI 0.22−0.36, p < 0.00001) and ctDNA- subgroups (HR 0.37; 95 % CI 0.28−0.49, p < 0.00001; p-interaction = 0.14). Objective response rate (odds ratio 6.21; 95 % CI 4.25–9.07, p < 0.00001 vs 6.44; 95 % CI 4.21–9.87, p < 0.00001) and overall survival (HR 0.82; 95 % CI 0.70–1.04 vs HR 0.77; 95CI% 0.59–1.00) similarly favoured EGFR-TKI in both ctDNA + and ctDNA- subgroups respectively. ConclusionOur findings indicate that approximately two in five tissue EGFR mutation-positive patients will not be detected using a qPCR assay, but would still potentially benefit from highly effective EGFR-TKI treatment. A negative EGFR ctDNA result via qPCR testing is therefore insufficient to exclude benefit from EGFR-TKI. Attempts should be made to repeat EGFR testing with a tissue biopsy in this patient group. As newer ctDNA assays with better sensitivity become available, the clinical impact for any false negatives will remain an important consideration.