Treatment Of Plaque Psoriasis Research Articles

A non-interventional, multicenter study to characterize the socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, and management of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) patients in Spain: IMPULSE study.

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare, and potentially life-threatening skin condition characterized by flares comprising widespread sterile pustules and systemic inflammation. Both the rarity and heterogeneity of the disease have made GPP classification and standardization of clinical criteria challenging. Before the approval of spesolimab (IL-36R antibody) in 2022 there were no approved treatments in the USA or Europe for GPP flares. Treatment for GPP has amounted to off-label use of medicines approved to treat plaque psoriasis. Our aim was to describe the socio-demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment patterns of patients with GPP in Spain. Non-interventional, descriptive, multi-center, retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed with GPP in Spain. 56 patients (50% women) were included, with a mean (SD) age at diagnosis of 53.7 (20.5) and a mean (SD) time of follow-up of 3.7 (3.1) years. In 80% of patients, GPP diagnosis was associated with a flare and 67.3% had known risk factors for GPP [such as previous diagnosis or family history of plaque psoriasis, comorbidities, smoking or stress. Hypertension and plaque psoriasis were the most frequent comorbidities (44.6% each). The number of GPP flares per patient-year was 0.55 with (range 0-4) a mean (SD) body surface area involvement of 21.3% (19.1). The most frequent manifestations of GPP flares were pustules (88.5%), erythema (76.9%) and scaling (76.9%). Additionally, 65.4% of patients had plaque psoriasis, 53.8% had unspecified skin lesions, and 30.8% experienced pain. The treatments used for GPP flares were off-label conventional systemic drugs (75%), mostly corticosteroids, cyclosporine and acitretin. In the periods between flares, off-label biologics were used in 56.5% of patients. During the study period, 9 patients (16.1%) had at least one complication, and 5 of them required hospitalization. This is the first multi-center study in Spanish GPP patients. Most patients were in their fifties, with personal or family history of plaque psoriasis, stress, smoking and a wide range of comorbidities and complications. Even though the number of flares per patient/year was 0.55, there was variability between patients. Both off-label conventional systemics and off-label biologics were used for flare management without a clear treatment pattern.

Safety of tildrakizumab: a disproportionality analysis based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database from 2018–2023

Background: Tildrakizumab, the IL-23 inhibitor, is used to treat plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Many studies have reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs) associated with Tildrakizumab.Objective: The aim of this study was to describe ADRs associated with Tildrakizumab monotherapy by mining data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Methods: The signals of Tildrakizumab-associated ADRs were quantified using disproportionality analyses such as the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the multiitem gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) algorithms.Results: A total of 10,530,937 reports of ADRs were collected from the FAERS database, of which 1,177 reports were identified with tildrakizumab as the “primary suspect (PS)”. Tildrakizumab-induced ADRs occurred against 27 system organ classes (SOCs). A total of 32 significant disproportionality Preferred Terms (PTs) conformed to the algorithms. Unexpected significant ADRs such as coronavirus infection, herpes simplex, diverticulitis, atrial fibrillation and aortic valve incompetence were also possible. The median time to onset of Tildrakizumab-associated ADRs was 194 days (interquartile range [IQR] 84–329 days), with the majority occurring, within the first 1 and 3 months after initiation of Tildrakizumab.Conclusion: This study identified a potential signal for new ADRs with Tildrakizumab, which might provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk prediction.

New and Emerging Treatments for Generalized Pustular Psoriasis: Focus on IL-36 Receptor Inhibitors

Generalized Pustular Psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and severe subtype of psoriasis that significantly impacts patients’ quality of life. Until recently, no specific treatment modalities were available, and treatment for GPP followed the guidelines for the treatment of plaque psoriasis, consisting of conventional treatments, such as retinoids, methotrexate, and even biologics, which although effective in some cases, may be associated with significant side effects, necessitating more effective and safe options. The pathophysiology of Generalized Pustular Psoriasis is complex and not fully understood, but there is some overlap with the pathogenesis of Plaque Psoriasis. In GPP, the innate immune system seems to play a more significant role, with the interleukin (IL)-36 pathway being fundamentally involved. Spesolimab and imsidolimab, two recently developed therapeutic agents, target the IL-36 inflammatory pathway by binding to the IL-36 receptor (IL-36R). Both biologics have already been evaluated in phase 1 and 2 clinical trials and have shown promising results in terms of safety and efficacy. IL-36 receptor inhibitors demonstrated great efficacy and good safety profile in the management of patients with GPP, demonstrating their potential to emerge as a leading treatment option. This review aims to explore and summarize the current scientific literature on the most recently developed treatments for GPP.

Deucravacitinib Induces Proteasomal Degradation of YAP1 in Human Glioblastoma Cells

Deucravacitinib is a selective allosteric inhibitor of tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) recently approved by the FDA for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. We discovered that this compound induces proteasomal degradation of YAP1, the downstream effector of the Hippo signaling pathway, in human glioblastoma (GBM) cells (U-87 MG). This degradation is independent of the canonical Hippo pathway, which offers clues to alternative mechanisms for YAP1 regulation.

Efficacy and safety of various drug combinations in treating plaque Psoriasis: A meta-analysis

Background Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory disease affecting the skin, joints, and nails (2-3% worldwide), significantly affects quality of life. Genetic and environmental factors also play key roles. Topical corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and oral corticosteroids help to manage plaque psoriasis symptoms, but combination therapies might offer greater effectiveness and improved safety profiles. These combinations could potentially reduce medication dosages and side effects in patients. Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of various drug combinations over conventional monotherapies in the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, which incorporates palmoplantar psoriasis and psoriasis vulgaris, by discovering and utilizing research articles comprising the same or similar variables as PASI 75 and evaluating the information using RevMan v5.4.1. Method We reviewed the efficacy and safety of combination therapy vs. monotherapy/placebo for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (palmoplantar and vulgaris) using PASI 75 via RevMan v5.4.1. Risk of bias assessment and funnel plots were employed to assess the heterogeneity of each paper. Inclusion criteria – Publications < 20yrs, RCTs, plaque/palmoplantar/psoriasis vulgaris; exclusion criteria – Guttate/arthritic psoriasis, pediatric and pregnant individuals, publications > 20 yrs. Results Seventeen studies were analyzed, comprising a total of 2291 patients (n=1147 with combination regimens and n=1144 with control regimen in the analysis). A significant PASI 75- response was observed in the pioglitazone combination subgroup as compared to placebo (OR=4.92,95% CI 2.19-11.05, P = 0.0001); methotrexate combination subgroup as compared to placebo (OR=2.56, 95% CI 1.67-3.94, P< 0.0001) test of subgroup differences showed P= 0.14, I2= 34%. Incidence rate of abnormality in levels of liver enzymes (OR=1.89,9.5% CI 6.69-5.22, P=0.22), nausea (OR=1.28,95% CI 0.77-2.14, P=0.34), headache (OR=1.28,95% CI 0.77-2.14, P=0.58), fatigue (OR=0.89, 95% CI 0.41-1.90, P=0.45).] Conclusion This study showed that combination therapy is very effective for plaque psoriasis, with promising combinations of pioglitazone. While safety seems similar between the groups, larger studies are needed to determine the long-term effects. These findings suggest that personalized treatment plans could improve outcomes; however, confirmation through larger trials is crucial before wider use. This opens doors to research on optimal combinations for individual patients.

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of cold laser (Diode 808 nm) therapy in the treatment of localized plaque psoriasis: clinical, dermoscopic and ultrastructural study

Background Psoriasis is a chronic, recurring, and immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. Throughout the period of the last few decades, phototherapy has become widely used in treating stable psoriatic lesions. For the treatment of psoriasis, several light/laser therapies with distinct modes of action have been developed. Cold laser therapy might be an effective therapeutic choice for localized plaque psoriasis. Objective To assess the safety and efficacy of cold laser therapy clinically and microscopically in localized plaque psoriasis treatment. Patients and methods 40 patients with localized mild plaque psoriasis were selected from the Dermatology and Venereology outpatient clinic–Tanta University Hospitals and enrolled in the clinical trial. They were treated by cold laser 808 nm wavelength (Endolaser 422, Enraf–nonious B.V. Rotterdam, Netherlands) one session for 10 min on each plaque twice weekly separated by 2 days until clinical cure or for a maximum of 8 weeks. Evaluation was done immediately after the last session by taking the average of three blinded dermatologists of the photos, the modified Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [mPASI], dermoscopic examination, patients’ satisfaction scale and histopathological and electron microscopic examination of punch biopsy specimens taken before and after the end of treatment from psoriatic lesions in four patients only. Results There was a statistically significant clinical improvement after the end of treatment compared with before treatment as 16 patients (40%) showed excellent improvement, 8 patients (20%) showed good improvement, 9 patients (22.5%) showed mild improvement, and 7 patients (17.5%) showed poor improvement. As regard mPASI, a statistically significant decrease in mPASI was found after the end of treatment (P<0.001). Regarding dermoscopic examination, a statistically significant reduction in the percentage of patients showing dermoscopic red dots and white scales after the end of treatment (P<0.01). As regard the patients’ satisfaction scale, 82.5% of patients were satisfied from the results. Histopathological and ultrastructural evaluation revealed normalization of the psoriatic microscopic changes with cold laser. Conclusion The use of cold laser therapy for the management of localized mild plaque psoriasis is safe, tolerable, effective, and can be used as an alternative therapy for psoriasis.

Italian S3-Guideline on the treatment of Atopic Eczema - Part 1: Systemic therapy, adapted from EuroGuiDerm by the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Environmental Dermatology (SIDAPA).

SIDeMaST (Società Italiana di Dermatologia Medica, Chirurgica, Estetica e delle Malattie Sessualmente Trasmesse) contributed to the development of the present guideline on the systemic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. With the permission of EuroGuiDerm, SIDeMaST adapted the guideline to the Italian healthcare context to supply a reliable and affordable tool to Italian physicians who take care of patients affected by atopic dermatitis. The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This first part of the guideline includes general information on its scope and purpose, the health questions covered, target users and a methods section. It also provides guidance on which patients should be treated with systemic therapies, as well as recommendations and detailed information on each systemic drug. The systemic treatment options discussed in the guideline comprise conventional immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, ciclosporin, glucocorticosteroids, methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil), biologics (dupilumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab, omalizumab and tralokinumab) and janus kinase inhibitors (abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib). Part two of the guideline will address avoidance of provocation factors, dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine, educational interventions, occupational and psychodermatological aspects, patient perspective and considerations for pediatric, adolescent, pregnant and breastfeeding patients.

Italian S3-Guideline on the treatment of Atopic Eczema - Part 2: non-systemic treatments and treatment recommendations for special AE patient populations, adapted from EuroGuiDerm by the Italian Society of Dermatology and STD (SIDEMAST), the Italian Association of Hospital Dermatologists (ADOI) and the Italian Society of Allergological and Occupational Dermatology (SIDAPA).

SIDeMaST (Società Italiana di Dermatologia Medica, Chirurgica, Estetica e delle Malattie Sessualmente Trasmesse) contributed to the development of the present guideline on the systemic treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. With the permission of EuroGuiDerm, SIDeMaST adapted the guideline to the Italian healthcare context to supply a reliable and affordable tool to Italian physicians who take care of patients affected by atopic dermatitis. The evidence- and consensus-based guideline on atopic eczema was developed in accordance with the EuroGuiDerm Guideline and Consensus Statement Development Manual. Four consensus conferences were held between December 2020 and July 2021. Twenty-nine experts (including clinicians and patient representatives) from 12 European countries participated. This second part of the guideline includes recommendations and detailed information on basic therapy with emollients and moisturizers, topical anti-inflammatory treatment, antimicrobial and antipruritic treatment and UV phototherapy. Furthermore, this part of the guideline covers techniques for avoiding provocation factors, as well as dietary interventions, immunotherapy, complementary medicine and educational interventions for patients with atopic eczema and deals with occupational and psychodermatological aspects of the disease. It also contains guidance on treatment for pediatric and adolescent patients and pregnant or breastfeeding women, as well as considerations for patients who want to have a child. A chapter on the patient perspective is also provided. The first part of the guideline, published separately, contains recommendations and guidance on systemic treatment with conventional immunosuppressive drugs, biologics and janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, as well as information on the scope and purpose of the guideline, and a section on guideline methodology.

Bimekizumab for the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis with Involvement of Genitalia: A 16-Week Multicenter Real-World Experience - IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis).

Genital involvement is observed in approximately 60% of patients with psoriasis, presenting clinicians with formidable challenges in treatment. While new biologic drugs have emerged as safe and effective options for managing psoriasis, their efficacy in challenging-to-treat areas remains inadequately explored. Intriguingly, studies have shown that interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors exhibit effectiveness in addressing genital psoriasis. We aimed to determine the effectiveness profile of bimekizumab in patients affected by moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with involvement of genitalia. Bimekizumab, a dual inhibitor of both IL-17A and IL-17F, was the focus of our 16-week study, demonstrating highly favorable outcomes for patients with genital psoriasis. The effectiveness of bimekizumab was evaluated in terms of improvement in Static Physician Global Assessment of Genitalia (sPGA-G) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index. Sixty-five adult patients were enrolled. Remarkably, 98.4% of our participants achieved a clear sPGA-G score (s-PGA-g = 0) within 16 weeks. Moreover, consistent improvements were observed in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores, accompanied by a significant reduction in the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index, signifying enhanced quality of life. Notably, none of the patients reported a severe impairment in their quality of life after 16 weeks of treatment. In our cohort of 65 patients, subgroup analyses unveiled that the effectiveness of bimekizumab remained unaffected by prior exposure to other biologics or by obesity. Our initial findings suggest that bimekizumab may serve as a valuable treatment option for genital psoriasis. Nevertheless, further research with larger sample sizes and longer-term follow-up is imperative to conclusively validate these results.

Burden of illness and unmet needs in generalized pustular psoriasis: report of four cases

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP), the most severe form of pustular psoriasis, is a rare autoinflammatory skin disease that manifests with the rapid and widespread eruption of small, sterile pustules and surrounding skin erythema, often accompanied by systemic symptoms. GPP is frequently painful and distressing and adversely affects patients’ quality of life. Until recently, systemic treatment for GPP in the United States mainly involved the off-label use of agents approved to treat plaque psoriasis. In September 2022, spesolimab was approved in the United States as a first-in-class treatment for GPP flares in adults, making a GPP-specific therapy available. Here, we describe 4 cases from our respective clinical practices that highlight the difficulties faced by patients with GPP in receiving an accurate diagnosis and obtaining effective treatment and demonstrate the associated physical and psychological disease burdens. The potential severity and consequences of untreated GPP necessitate a prompt diagnosis, initiation of effective treatment, and regular follow-up and monitoring of patients’ conditions. When managing GPP, a multidisciplinary approach is recommended to ensure that patients receive appropriate social and emotional support and effective medical care.

Comparing Achievement of National Psoriasis Foundation Treatment Targets among Patients with Plaque Psoriasis Treated with Ixekizumab versus Other Biologics in Clinical and Real-World Studies.

The National Psoriasis Foundation (NPF) recommends evaluating patient response to treatment at week12, with a target response of ≤ 1% body surface area (BSA) affected by plaque psoriasis and an acceptable response of BSA ≤ 3% or ≥ 75% improvement. This posthoc analysis compared the achievement of NPF target and acceptable responses for ixekizumab (IXE) versus other biologics. Outcomes were evaluated at week12 for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis from fourhead-to-head randomized clinical trials (RCTs; UNCOVER-2, UNCOVER-3, IXORA-R, and IXORA-S) and one real-world prospective observational study (Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes; PSoHO). RCT patients were treated with IXE or etanercept (ETN; UNCOVER-2/3), guselkumab (GUS; IXORA-R), or ustekinumab (UST; IXORA-S). PSoHO patients were treated with anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics (IXE, secukinumab, SEC) and other approved biologics for the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Patients with missing outcomes were imputed as non-responder imputation. For RCT data, statistical comparisons between treatment groups were performed using Fisher's exact test with no multiplicity adjustments. For real-world data, adjusted comparative analyses were performed using frequentist model averaging (FMA) and reported as odds ratio (OR). Across the four head-to-head clinical trials analyzed, significantly higher proportions of patients achieved target and acceptable responses at week12 with IXE versus ETN, GUS, or UST. Likewise, the proportion of PSoHO patients achieving target and acceptable response at week12 was higher with IXE compared with other individual biologics. Adjusted comparative analyses showed that IXE had significantly greater odds of target and acceptable response at week12 versus SEC, GUS, risankizumab (RIS), adalimumab (ADA), UST, and tildrakizumab (TILD) and numerically greater odds of target and acceptable response at week12 versus brodalumab (BROD). Across both clinical studies and real-world settings, more patients treated with IXE achieved NPF target and acceptable responses at week12 compared with those treated with other biologics. UNCOVER-2 (NCT01597245); UNCOVER-3 (NCT01646177); IXORA-R (NCT03573323); IXORA-S (NCT02561806); PSoHO (EUPAS24207).

Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib for chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

To summarize and analyze the results of published randomized controlled trials of tofacitinib for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis(PsA) and discuss its efficacy and safety. An exhaustive systematic search encompassing PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to July 2023. Studies eligible for inclusion were analyzed, organized using Review Manager version 5.4.1 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and STATA 15.0 version (Stata Corp, College Station, TX, USA) software. A total of six articles, covering 1393 patients (844 treated with tofacitinib and 549 with placebo), were included. The foundational characteristics of tofacitinib and placebo group showed similarity, except for age and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score, especially in the context of chronic plaque psoriasis. It is noteworthy that we discovered tofacitinib exhibited a significant impact on Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) response, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) response, and adverse events (AEs) in cases of chronic plaque psoriasis. Similarly, tofacitinib demonstrated substantial influence on American College of Rheumatology 20/50 (ACR20/50) response, PASI75 response, as well as alterations in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) Score, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score, Dactylitis Severity Score (DSS), and Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) Score in the context of psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Nevertheless, there was no statistically significant impact of tofacitinib on serious adverse events (SAEs) in chronic plaque psoriasis, as well as on both adverse events (AEs) and SAEs in psoriatic arthritis (PsA). A comprehensive analysis revealed that tofacitinib has a positive effect on addressing skin and joint symptoms, as well as improving the quality of life for patients with chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). However, the safety of the drug's long-term usage even requires further validation. Key Points • In 6 analyses involving a total of 1393 patients, tofacitinib exhibits positive effect on the treatment of both chronic plaque psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). • Although dose-based subgroup analyses have demonstrated effectiveness. Some studies indicate that the 5-mg dose (twice daily) may not show an effect due to the failure of non-inferiority trials comparing tofacitinib with placebo. Therefore, caution is required when interpreting its effectiveness. On the other hand, the 10-mg dose (BID) has been associated with an increase in adverse events and serious adverse events,and is recommended to be used with caution in patients with cardiovascular or uveitis risk factors. • Tofacitinib has efficacy in comorbid psychiatric disorders (depression, anxiety, or Alzheimer's disease) and inflammatory bowel disease (ulcerative colitis), but patients with comorbid renal insufficiency, hepatic dysfunction, osteoporosis, cardiovascular disease, or uveitis may need to be moderated or avoided with tofacitinib.

Drug survival of biologics in psoriasis: An Australian multicentre retrospective study.

Drug survival, which refers to the time from treatment initiation to discontinuation, provides a surrogate measure of the effectiveness of a biologic in a real-world setting (J Invest Dermatol, 2015, 135, 1). The aim of this study was to determine the drug survival of biologics that are currently available in Australia. We also analysed the treatment efficacy of these biologics and reasons for discontinuation. Retrospective data from outpatient Dermatology biologic clinics in Westmead Hospital and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Sydney, Australia) from April 2006 to December 2020 were collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate drug survival. A total of 306 patients who underwent 566 treatment courses were analysed. Guselkumab was observed to have the longest drug survival, with cumulative drug survival rates of 94.2% ± 4.0 at 1- and 5-years. This was followed by ixekizumab which had a 1-year survival rate of 87.2% ± 4.5 and 5-year survival rate of 59.4% ± 9.5. Ixekizumab and guselkumab were also noted to have superior treatment efficacy compared with other biologics, with PASI-75 rates of 94.9% and 93.8%, respectively. The most common reasons for treatment discontinuation were a lack of initial efficacy to treatment and a loss of efficacy over time despite an initial response, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the first Australian study to report on outcomes of multiple new biologics that are currently in use for the treatment of chronic plaque psoriasis. Overall, this study provides insight into patterns of care from a local experience that may help guide the management of moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Tapinarof Cream 1% Once Daily is Efficacious in the Treatment of Mild to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the Head and Neck Region

Introduction: Tapinarof cream 1% (VTAMA®, Dermavant Sciences, Inc.) is a non-steroidal, topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults, with no restrictions on location, extent, or duration of use. In the phase 3 PSOARING trial program, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) was efficacious and well tolerated for treating psoriasis, including the head and neck region. However, efficacy data specific to scalp treatment were not captured.Objective: To assess efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tapinarof cream for the treatment of adults with plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region, including the scalp. Methods: In this phase 4, open-label trial, adults received tapinarof for 12 weeks. Patients had plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck (stable for ≥3 months), and a target lesion Physician Global Assessment (tPGA) score of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), or 4 (severe). The primary endpoint was the proportion achieving a tPGA response (tPGA score of clear [0], or almost clear [1] and ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at Week 12). Additional endpoints included time to achieve tPGA response; proportion with complete clearance (tPGA score=0); and with ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI; head and neck region). Safety and tolerability evaluations included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed Local Tolerability Scale (LTS) scores. Results: 31 patients with mild to severe plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region received tapinarof. At baseline, 54.8% had a tPGA score of 3 and 58.1% (18/31) had the target lesion on the scalp. At Week 12, 88.5% (n=23/26) achieved a tPGA response and 80.8% (n=21/26) achieved complete clearance (tPGA=0). There was rapid onset of efficacy, with both tPGA response and complete clearance achieved as early as Week 1, the first assessment, in some patients. Median times to tPGA response and complete clearance were ~4 and 8 weeks, respectively. At Week 12, 96.2% (n=25/26) and 84.6% (n=22/26) achieved a ≥75% and ≥90% improvement in PASI (head and neck region), respectively. Most AEs were mild or moderate, consistent with previous trials; the most frequent were contact dermatitis, folliculitis, and headache. Most patients had no irritation of the head and neck region (LTS score=0) at all visits.Conclusions: Tapinarof cream 1% QD demonstrated rapid onset of clinically meaningful efficacy as early as Week 1 in patients with plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region, including for scalp lesions. Tapinarof cream is a cosmetically elegant, well-tolerated, non-steroidal treatment option in adults with mild to severe plaque psoriasis, including in the head and neck region.Funding Support: Dermavant Sciences, Inc.

Tapinarof Cream 1% Once Daily Improves Patient-Reported Outcomes in the Treatment of Mild to Severe Plaque Psoriasis in the Head and Neck Region

Introduction: Tapinarof cream 1% (VTAMA®, Dermavant Sciences, Inc.) is a non-steroidal, topical aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist approved for the treatment of plaque psoriasis in adults with no restrictions on location, extent, or duration of use. In the phase 3 PSOARING trial program, tapinarof cream 1% once daily (QD) for the treatment of plaque psoriasis was efficacious and well tolerated. Plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region occurs commonly, with a high impact on patients’ health-related quality of life, through pruritus and psychological distress. Patients may consider topicals unacceptable for scalp/facial use due to poor cosmetic properties (e.g., greasiness), leading to low medication adherence. There is a need for efficacious, cosmetically elegant, non-steroidal topicals that can be used without restrictions.Objective: To assess patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with tapinarof cream for adults with mild to severe plaque psoriasis in the head and neck region, including the scalp, in a phase 4, open-label trial.Methods: Adults with head and neck region target lesion Physician Global Assessment (tPGA) score of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), or 4 (severe) received tapinarof for 12 weeks. PROs included Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score for the head and neck region; achievement of ≥4-point reduction in PP-NRS score; Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score by visit; and responses to a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire© (PSQ) at Week 12.Results: 31 patients received tapinarof; 58.1% (18/31) had the target lesion on the scalp. Baseline mean PP-NRS (head and neck region) and total DLQI scores were 5.8 and 9.7, respectively, demonstrating significant pruritus and disease impact. Improvement in mean PP-NRS score was demonstrated at Week 1 (–1.6), the earliest assessment, surpassing the minimal clinically important ≥4-point improvement by Week 12 (−4.2). At Week 12, 70.0% (n=14/20) achieved ≥4-point reduction in PP-NRS score. Mean DLQI minimal clinically important difference of −4.0 was demonstrated as early as Week 1 (−4.0), improving to −7.2 at Week 12. Most patients strongly agreed or agreed with PSQ questions assessing satisfaction with cosmetic elegance (93.3%), quick absorption (96.7%), application ease (86.7%), efficacy (83.3%), and confidence in tapinarof (83.3%). Compared with topicals used previously for plaque psoriasis, most strongly agreed or agreed that tapinarof was more effective (76.9%) and easier to use (76.9%).Conclusions: In patients with plaque psoriasis affecting the head and neck region, tapinarof cream 1% QD demonstrated rapid and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported pruritus and disease impact as early as Week 1, the first assessment, with continued improvement through Week 12. Patients reported high rates of satisfaction and positive perceptions of tapinarof.Funding Support: Dermavant Sciences, Inc.

Targeted review of IL36RN mutations in patients with generalised pustular psoriasis.

Generalised pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare and chronic skin disease historically treated with therapies that were originally intended to treat plaque psoriasis (PsO). However, GPP and plaque PsO have distinct pathogeneses and clinical courses. This study aimed to further characterise the unique genetic background of GPP by summarising evidence on the frequency and type of IL36RN gene mutation, a gene that normally suppresses proinflammatory responses, in patients with GPP compared to patients with GPP and plaque PsO, and patients with plaque PsO only. A targeted literature review was conducted to identify studies reporting IL36RN mutations and/or HLA-Cw6 allele frequency in patients with GPP. Meta-analyses showed a significantly higher rate of IL36RN mutations in the GPP-only population compared to the GPP+plaque PsO population (OR 3.51; 95% CI 2.29, 5.38). Monoallelic mutations of IL36RN were found in up to 33.3%, and biallelic mutations in up to 73.2% of patients with GPP (GPP-only and GPP+plaque PsO), in contrast with mono- and biallelic frequencies of only 0%-11.9% and 0%, respectively, in patients with plaque PsO only. Mean age-of-onset ranged from 5.9 to 48.9years old, with most studies reporting a GPP age-of-onset between 20 and 40years old. Twenty-one mutations were identified in the biallelic state and three in monoallelic. The most reported mutations were c.115+6T>C (p. Arg10ArgfsX1) (18 studies); c.227C>T (p.Pro76Leu) (10 studies); and c.338C> T (p.Ser113Leu) (8 studies). Mutations varied depending on geography and ethnicity, with the most frequently reported mutation predominantly reported in East Asian studies and international studies that included Asian patients. Rates of HLA-Cw6, the risk allele most strongly associated with plaque PsO, were 0%-28.6% for patients with GPP, similar to rates in the general population (10.5%-20%). Considering the differences between GPP and plaque PsO in aetiology and disease symptoms, effective, GPP-specific treatment options are needed, and recent research suggests that blockade of IL-36 signalling may be an effective target for treatment of GPP.

Employing zero-inflated beta distribution in an exposure-response analysis of TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor brepocitinib in patients with plaque psoriasis.

Brepocitinib is an oral selective dual TYK2/JAK1 inhibitor and based on its cytokine inhibition profile is expected to provide therapeutic benefit in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. Efficacy data from a completed Phase 2a study in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were utilized to develop a population exposure-response model that can be employed to inform dose selection decisions for further clinical development. A modeling approach that employs the zero-inflated beta distribution was used to account for the bounded nature and distributional characteristics of the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score data. The developed exposure-response model provided an adequate description of the observed PASI scores across all the treatment arms tested and across both the induction and maintenance dosing periods of the study. In addition, the developed model exhibited a good predictive capacity with regard to the derived responder metrics (e.g., 75%/90%/100% improvement in PASI score [PASI75/90/100]). Clinical trial simulations indicated that the induction/maintenance dosing paradigm explored in this study does not offer any advantages from an efficacy perspective and that doses of 10, 30, and 60mg once-daily may be suitable candidates for clinical evaluation in subsequent Phase 2b studies.

Atypical plaque psoriasis: a clinicopathological study of 20 cases.

Plaque psoriasis is relatively straightforward to identify. When diagnostic concerns arise in atypical cases, a biopsy is needed. It is widely accepted that the Munro microabscess and the spongiform pustule of Kogoj are diagnostic pathological features. However, the diagnostic dilemma is likely to arise in cases without these specific pathological changes and typical clinical features. This study aimed to investigate clinical and pathological clues in distinguishing atypical plaque psoriasis from its mimics. We evaluated the clinicopathological features of 20 cases of atypical plaque psoriasis and 40 cases of psoriasis mimics as controls including pityriasis rosea (n = 10), pityriasis lichenoides chronica (n = 8), and subacute dermatitis (n = 22). A retrospective analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with atypical plaque psoriasis and controls was performed. Pathologically, there were significant differences between the two groups in the types of parakeratosis (P = 0.046), epidermal capture of extravasated erythrocytes (P = 0.011), focal basal liquefied degeneration (P = 0.017), types of inflammatory cells (P = 0.000), and depth of inflammation (P = 0.000). Clinically, we found the presence of scales and crusts was significantly different between the two groups. This study offers insight into the clinicopathological features of atypical plaque psoriasis. These differential diagnostic features, compared with its mimics, are proposed to assist the clinician in the diagnosis and treatment of atypical plaque psoriasis.

A228 RISANKIZUMAB - DRUG INDUCED LIVER INJURY; A CASE REPORT

Abstract Background Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody to IL-23. It was initially used in the treatment of plaque psoriasis with recent approval to extend use to treat moderate to severe Crohn’s disease with evidence of endoscopic healing and clinical remission of disease. In the drugs safety manual, it has been reported to have transient liver enzyme elevation that is asymptomatic and not to a degree requiring drug discontinuation. No reported data on steatohepatitis. In this article we describe a 28 year old female, who had no evidence of liver disease in the past who underwent treatment with Risankizumab and within several months developed evidence of steatohepatitis with radiological evidence of significant hepatomegaly. Aims Case report details Drug induced liver injury to Risankizumab. Methods Case Report Results Drug induced liver injury with elevated liver enzyme levels and liver biopsy showing drug related liver changes likely in the setting of Risankizumab use. Conclusions Risankizumab is a newly approved drug in the setting of Crohn's disease, although described in the drug assessment report that it may cause transient hepatitis or eleveted liver enzymes in the setting of lower drug dose for Psoriasis use, the higher drug level used in the setting of Crohn's disease has not been formally evaluated and no previous known case reports of Drug induced Liver Injury to Risankizumab causing severe steatohepatitis Funding Agencies None

Efficacy and safety of epidural block with lidocaine for refractory severe plaque psoriasis: An open-label pilot study in real world setting.

Epidural block using lidocaine, a non-selective blocker of voltage-gated sodium channels (Nav), has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of severe plaque psoriasis in a limited number of cases. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of epidural lidocaine block in adult patients with severe, treatment-resistant plaque psoriasis. This was an open-label pilot study. Patients with severe plaque-type psoriasis unresponsive to at least one systemic treatment were enrolled for a 1-week epidural lidocaine block and followed up for 48 weeks. Thirty-six patients participated, with 32 completing the study. At the 12-week mark, there was a remarkable 59% improvement in the mean Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) score (P < 0.001). By week 48, 28 out of 32 patients (87%) achieved PASI 75, while 18 out of 32 (56%) reached PASI 90. Within 7 days, 20 out of 21 patients (95%) reported a reduction in itch, with a mean itch reduction of 82% at day 1 and 94% at day 7. Notably, no severe side effects were observed. Epidural lidocaine block proved to be an effective and safe long-term treatment option for individuals with refractory severe plaque psoriasis.