In situ passivation technology, by reducing the bioavailability of arsenic in soil, thereby reducing its uptake by crops, is currently the main remediation method for arsenic-contaminated farmland soil. However, applying stabilizing materials may also affect the other properties of soil, ultimately influencing the growth of crops. The long growth cycles of crops and their susceptibility to factors such as agronomic measures make plant-based indicators less practical as evaluation indicators. In this study, five kinds of passivation materials, including iron-based biochar (T1), coffee residue (T2), red mud (T3), chitosan-modified iron filings (T4), and modified minerals (T5) were applied in pot experiments. The study analyzed the effects of the passivation materials on soil properties and the growth and safety traits of plants. Key soil indicators influencing biomass were identified, the passivation remediation effects were evaluated, and a method using soil property indicators instead of plant indicators for passivation remediation evaluation was developed. The results showed that key indicators influencing the biomass change of water spinach due to passivation treatment included total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and catalase activity. The improved comprehensive evaluation indicators for passivation effects include available arsenic in soil, total nitrogen, total phosphorus, and catalase activity. I-SI can be expressed as I-SI=0.6∆Assoil+0.4−2.152∆TN+0.422∆TP+0.334∆CAT−0.261. I-SI is highly feasible, where a higher value indicates better remediation efficacy. After evaluation, iron-based biochar was the best passivation effect. An evaluation method for the passivation effect was constructed based on these findings, aiming to simplify the process of comprehensive evaluation of the passivation effect and shorten the evaluation time, providing a new idea for assessing the passivation effect.
Read full abstract