Plane Of Regard Research Articles

Selected visual parameters related to the working conditions of musicians

Professional musicians are required to practice playing instruments for long hours, which often exerts significant impact on their health. Attention should be given to the specificity of playing each instrument, including uncomfortable and sustained body position and repetitive movements causing long-term strain of certain parts of the body. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of long-term playing wind and string instruments on the visual system. Ninety male and female subjects aged 15 to 30 years were included in the study and divided into two groups: musicians (Msc) and non-musicians (nMsc). Significantly less subjects in the Msc group had properly corrected vision, wore optical prescription recommended by an ophthalmologist/optometrist, and/or underwent any eye examination at all in their lifetime, even though more subjects in this group experienced certain asthenopic symptoms. Also, accommodative amplitude got statistically worse under dim illumination conditions, accommodative facility was significantly different between musicians and non-musicians, although there were no differences between the groups when tested in bright illumination. None of the music stands used by the study subjects met the respective standards concerning uniform illumination rates. Playing string and wind instruments is a challenge for the visual system due to the forced body and head positions, and asymmetry between the visual plane and the plane of regard as well as non-uniform illumination in the working environment. However, conditions such as correct working distance and proper tilt of the music stand may be beneficial to the visual system. It is the role of optometrists to properly educate their patients about the importance of appropriate vision correction, especially in dim light and under adverse working conditions and to communicate the impact of such conditions on the visual system.

Perception of the Plane of Regard

Perception of the Plane of Regard

Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: Evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism

Vergence eye movements were elicited in human subjects at short latencies (∼70 ms) by applying binocular disparities briefly (200 ms) to large grating patterns (46° wide, 35° high). The positions of both eyes were recorded with the electromagnetic search coil technique. Using a dichoptic viewing arrangement (Wheatstone stereoscope), each eye viewed two overlapping 1-D sine waves that had the same orientation but different spatial frequencies. These two sine waves each had a binocular disparity that was 1/4 of its wavelength and the effect of varying their relative contrasts was examined (15 contrast ratios ranging from 0.125 to 8). The first experiment used horizontal gratings and recorded the vertical vergence responses when the two sine waves had spatial frequencies in the ratio 3:5 and vertical disparities of opposite sign. Initial vergence responses showed a highly nonlinear dependence on the contrast ratio. On average, when the contrast of one sine wave exceeded that of the other by a factor of >2.2, the sine wave with the higher contrast dominated responses and the sine wave with the lower contrast had almost no influence: winner-take-all. A second experiment, which used vertical gratings and recorded the horizontal vergence responses when the two sine waves had spatial frequencies in the ratio 3:5 and horizontal disparities of opposite sign, also uncovered nonlinear interactions but these were much more variable from one subject to another and, on average, one sine wave did not achieve complete dominance until its contrast exceeded that of the other by a factor of >4.5. When these two experiments were repeated with grating patterns in which the two sine waves had spatial frequencies in the ratio 3:7 and disparities of the same sign, similar nonlinear interactions were apparent. We attribute the nonlinear dependence on relative contrast to mutual inhibition between the neural elements processing the disparities of the two sine waves. We further suggest that this interaction will help to maintain binocular alignment on the objects in the plane of regard because the retinal images of those objects will tend to be better focused—and hence tend to have higher contrasts—than the images of objects in other depth planes.

Collision judgment of objects approaching the head

Recent investigations have indicated that human perception of the trajectory of objects approaching in the horizontal plane is precise but biased away from straight ahead. This is remarkable because it could mean that subjects perceive objects that approach on a collision course as missing the head. Approach within the horizontal plane through the eyes and the fixation point (the plane of regard) is special, as general motions will also have a component of motion perpendicular to the plane of regard. Thus, we investigated three-dimensional motion perception in the vicinity of the head, including vertical components. Subjects judged whether an object that moved in the mid-sagittal plane was going to hit below or above a well-known reference point on the face like the center of the chin or the forehead (perceptual task). Tactile and proprioceptive information about the reference point significantly improved precision. Precision did not change with distance of the approaching target or with fixation direction. Bias was virtually absent for these vertical motions. When subjects pointed with their index finger to the perceived location of impact on their face (visuo-motor task), they overestimated (1.7 cm) the horizontal eccentricity of the point of impact (pointing task). Vertical bias, however, was again virtually absent. Interestingly, when trajectories intersected the plane of regard, higher precision was observed in the perceptual task regardless of the other conditions. In contrast, neither bias nor precision of the pointing task changed significantly when the trajectories intersected the plane of regard. When asked to point to the location where a trajectory intersected the plane of regard, subjects overestimated the depth component of this intersection location by about 3 cm. The absence of perceptual and pointing bias in the vertical direction in contrast to the clear horizontal bias suggests that different (combinations of) cues are used to judge these components of the trajectory of an approaching object. The results of our perceptual task suggest a role for somatosensory signals in the visual judgment of impending impact.

Localization of the plane of regard in space

When we fixate an object in space, the rotation centers of the eyes, together with the object, define a plane of regard. People perceive the elevation of objects relative to this plane accurately, irrespective of eye or head orientation (Poljac et al. (2004) Vision Res, in press). Yet, to create a correct representation of objects in space, the orientation of the plane of regard in space is required. Subjects pointed along an eccentric vertical line on a touch screen to the location where their plane of regard intersected the touch screen positioned on their right. The distance of the vertical line to the subject's eyes varied from 10 to 40 cm. Subjects were sitting upright and fixating one of the nine randomly presented directions ranging from 20 degrees left and down to 20 degrees right and up relative to their straight ahead. The eccentricity of fixations relative to the pointing location varied by up to 40 degrees . Subjects underestimated the elevation of their plane of regard (on average by 3.69 cm, SD=1.44 cm), regardless of the fixation direction or pointing distance. However, when the targets were shown on a display mounted in a table, to provide support of the subject's hand throughout the trial, subjects pointed accurately (average error 0.3 cm, SD=0.8 cm). In addition, head tilt 20 degrees to the left or right did not cause any change in accuracy. The bias observed in the first task could be caused by maintained tonus in arm muscles when the arm is raised, that might interfere with the transformation from visual to motor signals needed to perform the pointing movement. We conclude that the plane of regard is correctly localized in space. This may be a good starting point for representing objects in head-centric coordinates.

Voluntary binocular gaze-shifts in the plane of regard: Dynamics of version and vergence

We studied the dynamics of voluntary, horizontal, binocular gaze-shifts between pairs of continuously visible, real three-dimensional targets. Subjects were stabilized on a biteboard to allow full control of target angles, which were made to differ only in distance (pure vergence), only in direction (pure version; conjugate saccades) or in both distance and direction (disjunctive saccades). A wide range of changes in vergence (0–25 deg) and version (0–65 deg) was recorded to study the dynamics of disjunctive saccades, described until now for limited ranges, throughout the horizontal oculomotor range within manual working space, and to study the velocity-duration-amplitude relations (“main sequence”) of disjunctive vs conjugate saccades. Pure vergence was almost never observed; divergence, especially, was always associated with saccades. Likewise, horizontal saccades were never strictly conjugate, they always contained a transient divergence-convergence sequence. The amplitude and velocity of these transient components varied systematically with saccadic size. In combined version-vergence movements, vergence was, in general, accelerated and shortened as a function of increasing version. This effect was fairly uniform for divergence, which appeared to increase in velocity by about as much as the transient peak divergent velocity of the version saccade. The intrasaccadic fraction of divergence increased from about 50% to close to 100% as a function of increasing version. For convergence, saccades up to about 20 deg were also accelerating; in this case it appeared as if the transient peak convergent velocity of the version saccade was added to the basic convergence velocity. For larger saccades this effect was partly counteracted by the penetration of an initial divergence associated with the saccade. This initial divergence delayed and slowed down convergence. The intrasaccadic fraction of convergence varied between about 40% and 70%. In disjunctive saccades the individual eyes did not follow the main-sequence parameters of conjugate saccades of comparable sizes, except for the eye that moved with the combination “abduction and divergence”. For all other combinations of vergence and version, disjunctive saccades had lower peak velocities and longer durations than conjugate saccades. As a consequence, disjunctive version was also slower than conjugate version. Thus, while version accelerates vergence, vergence slows down version: in the generalized case of three-dimensional gaze-shifts, peak velocities and durations are in between those of the limiting cases of pure version and pure vergence. We conclude that, within manual working space, binocular gaze-shifts are effected by the highly integrated action of conjugate and disjunctive mechanisms, both of which are expressed preferentially in fast, saccadic movements.

Human optokinetic nystagmus is linked to the stereoscopic system.

It was previously proposed that a linkage between the optokinetic system and the stereoscopic system in higher mammals serves to allow these animals to selectively stabilize those parts of the visual scene which lie in the plane of convergence as the animals move forward in a three-dimensional world (Howard and Ohmi, 1984). A new procedure is now described by which OKN gain can be measured as a function of the binocular disparity of the stimulus. With vergence locked on a vertical line, the gain of the slow phase of vertical optokinetic nystagmus (OKN) was recorded in four human subjects as the binocular disparity (stereo depth) of the moving display was changed from -3 degrees to +3 degrees. The gain of OKN was found to be inversely proportional to binocular disparity. Evidence for cells in the visual cortex, MT and MST that are sensitive both to visual motion and binocular disparity is reviewed. It is argued that the activity of cells responsive to direction of motion and zero disparity selectively augments OKN and that this enables humans to stabilize the images of parts of the scene in the plane of regard while ignoring competing motion signals arising from other distances.

Kinematics of the eye.

A mathematical discussion is presented of eye positions and eye movements in terms of quaternion theory. An eye movement may be regarded as a rotation of the eye about an axis through the center of rotation. The parameters of the axis of rotation and the extent of the rotation are associated to form a higher complex number, and this leads to the definition of an eye position in terms of the rotation by which it is reached from the prinary position. Equations are derived for the parameters of the single rotation equivalent to two successive finite rotations, for Listing’s law, for torsional movements, for the angle between the primary horizontal meridian of the eye and the plane of regard, and for the angle between the primary vertical meridian of the eye and the true vertical plane through the fixation line.