Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Research Articles

Posterior-only approach cervical hemivertebrectomy and short fusion with pedicle screws in young children with cervical scoliosis: case report and technical note.

Cervical hemivertebrae (C3-6) causing significant osseous torticollis, head tilt and facial asymmetry are rare and complicated. Cervical hemivertebrectomy (CHVE) by a posterior-only approach was never reported because it is highly risky and its efficacy remains controversial. This study is to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary clinical outcomes of posterior-only approach for CHVE and torticollis correction in young children. Four young children aged 5-9 years old with significant torticollis caused by cervical hemivertebrae underwent deformity correction consisting of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with O-arm-based intraoperative navigation, CHVE using ultrasonic bone scalpel and short-segmental posterior instrumentation and fusion. Details of this novel technique were presented. The preliminary short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed. On average, the operative time was 312.5 ± 49.9min, and the surgical blood loss was 375.0 ± 150.0ml. The structural cervical scoliosis was corrected from 31.5 ± 7.3° to 11.0 ± 4.1°, and the average correction rate was 64.9%. Head tilt was favorably corrected from 11.0 ± 4.2° to 3.5 ± 2.6°. The shoulder balance improved from 6.3 ± 1.3° to 1.5 ± 1.9°. One case with C6 CHVE had convex side radiating nerve root pain but no sign of muscle power weakness. Full recovery was achieved one month after surgery. No other complication occurred. CHVE by a posterior-only approach was a feasible alternative option for the treatment of congenital cervical scoliosis. It could resect the CHV effectively and achieve satisfactory torticollis correction without additional anterior access surgery. Successful CPS placement in this child population was essentially important to enable reliable osteotomy closure and firm posterior instrumentation.

Pedicle screw placement in the cervical vertebrae using augmented reality-head mounted displays: a cadaveric proof-of-concept study

BackgroundThe accurate and safe positioning of cervical pedicle screws is crucial. While augmented reality (AR) use in spine surgery has previously demonstrated clinical utility in the thoracolumbar spine, its technical feasibility in the cervical spine remains less explored. PurposeThe objective of this study was to assess the precision and safety of AR-assisted pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine. Study DesignIn this experimental study, 5 cadaveric cervical spine models were instrumented from C3 to C7 by 5 different spine surgeons. The navigation accuracy and clinical screw accuracy were evaluated. MethodsPostprocedural CT scans were evaluated for clinical accuracy by 2 independent neuroradiologists using the Gertzbein-Robbins scale. Technical precision was assessed by calculating the angular trajectory (°) and linear screw tip (mm) deviations in the axial and sagittal planes from the virtual pedicle screw position as recorded by the AR-guided platform during the procedure compared to the actual pedicle screw position derived from postprocedural imaging. ResultsA total of forty-one pedicle screws were placed in 5 cervical cadavers, with each of the 5 surgeons navigating at least 7 screws. Gertzbein-Robbins grade of A or B was achieved in 100% of cases. The mean values for tip and trajectory errors in the axial and sagittal planes between the virtual versus actual position of the screws was less than 3 mm and 30°, respectively (p<.05). None of the cervical screws violated the cortex by more than 2 mm or displaced neurovascular structures. ConclusionsAR-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement in cadavers demonstrated clinical accuracy comparable to existing literature values for image-guided navigation methods for the cervical spine. Clinical SignificanceThis study provides technical and clinical accuracy data that supports clinical trialing of AR-assisted subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement.

Comparison of iCT-based navigation and fluoroscopic-guidance for atlantoaxial screw placement in 78 patients with traumatic cervical spine injuries

Background contextStudies have shown biomechanical superiority of cervical pedicle screw placement over other techniques. However, accurate placement is challenging due to the inherent risk of neurovascular complications. Navigation technology based on intraoperative 3D imaging allows highly accurate screw placement, yet studies specifically investigating screw placement in patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare atlantoaxial screw placement as treatment of traumatic instabilities using iCT-based navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance with intraoperative 3D control scans.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients with traumatic atlantoaxial injuries treated operatively with dorsal stabilization of C1 and C2. Patients were either assigned to the intraoperative navigation or fluoroscopic-guidance group. Screw accuracy, procedure time, and revisions were compared.ResultsSeventy-eight patients were included in this study with 51 patients in the navigation group and 27 patients in the fluoroscopic-guidance group. In total, 312 screws were placed in C1 and C2. Screw accuracy was high in both groups; however, pedicle perforations > 1 mm occurred significantly more often in the fluoroscopic-guidance group (P = 0.02). Procedure time was on average 23 min shorter in the navigation group (P = 0.02).ConclusionsThis study contributes to the available data showing that navigated atlantoaxial screw placement proves to be feasible as well as highly accurate compared to the fluoroscopic-guidance technique without prolonging the time needed for surgery. When comparing these data with other studies, the application of different classification systems for assessment of screw accuracy should be considered.

Comparison of Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy With Robotic Guidance System Versus Image Guidance System Using Propensity Score Matching.

A retrospective study. To compare the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement using a robotic guidance system (RGS) with that of using an image guidance system (IGS; navigation system) through propensity score matching. The RGS may provide accurate CPS placement, which may outperform IGS. However, no study has directly compared the accuracy of CPS placement with the RGS to that with the IGS. We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients who had undergone cervical fusion surgery using CPS with the RGS or IGS. To adjust for potential confounders (patient demographic characteristics, disease etiology, and registration material), propensity score matching was performed, creating robotic guidance (RG) and matched image guidance (IG) groups. The accuracy of CPS placement from C2 to C6, where the vertebral artery runs, was evaluated on postoperative computed tomography images according to the Neo classification (grade 0 to grade 3). Furthermore, the intraoperative CPS revisions and related complications were examined. Using propensity score matching, 22 patients were included in the RG and matched groups each, and a total of 95 and 105 CPSs, respectively, were included in the analysis. In both the axial and sagittal planes, the clinically acceptable rate (grades 0 + 1) of CPS placement did not differ between the RG and matched IG groups (97.9% vs 94.3% and 95.8% vs 96.2%, respectively). The incidence of CPS revision was similar between the groups (2.1% vs 2.9%), and no CPS-related complications were documented. Meanwhile, the incidence of lateral breach (grades 1 + 2 + 3) was significantly lower in the RG group than in the matched IG group (1.1% vs 7.7%, P= 0.037). The RGS and IGS can equally aid in accurate and safe CPS placement in clinical settings. Nonetheless, RGS can further reduce the lateral breach, compared with IGS.

Modified Tap-drilling Technique for Mid-cervical Pedicle Screw Placement: A Case Series of 473 Consecutive Screws.

Retrospective cohort study. To report our modified tap-drilling technique for mid-cervical pedicle screw placement and to evaluate its safety and accuracy. Cervical pedicle screw fixation, which provides a strong stabilization, has been a major concern due to the potential risks to neurovascular structures despite its increasing use. Several insertion techniques have been described so far to improve the cervical pedicle screw placement accuracy. This study retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent mid-cervical (C3-C6) pedicle screw fixation between September 2005 and September 2020. Laminectomy, laminoforaminotomy, or notch-referred anatomic landmark methods were used to adjust the entry point and the direction of the screws. After the cortical bone was removed at the entry point with a diamond burr, the cancellous bone was slowly drilled with a hand drill starting from 8 to 10 millimeters in length. Then, all of the bone walls were checked with a ball-tip probe to determine if there was any breach. The procedure was repeated several times. After completing the drilling, the screw was inserted without tapping. The breach rate of pedicle screws was analyzed on postoperative computed tomography scans. A total of 473 mid-cervical pedicle screws were placed in 122 consecutive patients. No navigation or computer-assisted system was used, and the first 2 authors inserted all of the screws. All patients completed the surgery, and no evident intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative CT scans were obtained for 405 screws. Although deviation was observed for 131 pedicle screws, a critical deviation was observed for only 25 pedicle screws. Cervical pedicle screw insertion is a risky but applicable technique. Checking all of the bone walls with a ball-tip probe before gradually advancing the hand drill in small amounts, as presented in this article, may lead to the safe and effective placement of cervical pedicle screws.

The Efficacy of Cervical Pedicle Screw Is Enhanced When Used With 5.5-mm Rods for Metastatic Cervical Spinal Tumor Surgery.

The cervical spine presents challenges in treating metastatic cervical spinal tumors (MCSTs). Although the efficacy of cervical pedicle screw placement (CPS) has been well established, its use in combination with 5.5-mm rods for MCST has not been reported. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of CPS combined with 5.5-mm rods in treating MCST and compare it with that of CPS combined with traditional 3.5-mm rods. This retrospective study analyzed 58 patients with MCST who underwent posterior cervical spinal fusion surgery by a single surgeon between March 2012 and December 2022. Data included demographics, surgical details, imaging results, numerical rating scale score for neck pain, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and Spine Oncology Study Group Outcomes Questionnaire responses. Preoperative Spinal Instability Neoplastic Scores were significantly higher in the 5.5-mm rod group. Greater kyphotic changes in the index vertebra were observed in the 3.5-mm rod group. Neck pain reduction was significantly better in the 5.5-mm rod group. CPS with 5.5-mm rods provides superior biomechanical stability and effectively resists forward bending momentum in posterior MCST fusion surgery. These findings support the use of 5.5-mm rods to enhance surgical outcomes.

Design, fabrication, and evaluation of single- and multi-level 3D-printed non-covering cervical spinal fusion surgery templates.

Cervical spinal fusion surgeries require accurate placement of the pedicle screws. Any misplacement/misalignment of these screws may lead to injuries to the spinal cord, arteries and other organs. Template guides have emerged as accurate and cost-effective tools for the safe and rapid insertions of pedicle screws. Novel patient-specific single- and multi-level non-covering templates for cervical pedicle screw insertions were designed, 3D-printed, and evaluated. CT scans of two patients were acquired to reconstruct their 3D spine model. Two sets of single-level (C3-C7) and multi-level (C4-C6) templates were designed and 3D-printed. Pedicle screws were inserted into the 3D-printed vertebrae by free-hand and guided techniques. For single-level templates, a total of 40 screws (2 patients × 5 vertebrae × 2 methods × 2 screws) and for multi-level templates 24 screws (2 patients × 3 vertebrae × 2 methods × 2 screws) were inserted by an experienced surgeon. Postoperative CT images were acquired to measure the errors of the entry point, 3D angle, as well as axial and sagittal plane angles of the inserted screws as compared to the initial pre-surgery designs. Accuracy of free-hand and guided screw insertions, as well as those of the single- and multi-level guides, were also compared using paired t-tests. Despite the minimal removal of soft tissues, the 3D-printed templates had acceptable stability on the vertebrae during drillings and their utilization led to statistically significant reductions in all error variables. The mean error of entry point decreased from 3.02mm (free-hand) to 0.29mm (guided) using the single-level templates and from 5.7mm to 0.76mm using the multi-level templates. The percentage reduction in mean of other error variables for, respectively, single- and multi-level templates were as follows: axial plane angle: 72% and 87%, sagittal plane angle: 56% and 78%, and 3D angle: 67% and 83%. The error variables for the multi-level templates generally exceeded those of the single-level templates. The use of single- and multi-level templates also considerably reduced the duration of pedicle screw placements. The novel single- and multi-level non-covering templates are valuable tools for the accurate placement of cervical pedicle screws.

Accurate Placement and Revisions for Cervical Pedicle Screws Placed With or Without Navigation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Systematic review and meta-analysis. To evaluate the accuracy of placement for cervical pedicle screws with and without the use of spinal navigation. A structured search was conducted in electronic databases without any language or date restrictions. Eligible studies reported the proportion of accurately placed cervical pedicle screws measured on intraoperative or postoperative 3D imaging, and reported whether intraoperative navigation was used during screw placement. Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria were used to evaluate the methodological quality of how accuracy was assessed for cervical pedicle screws. After screening and critical appraisal, 4697 cervical pedicle screws from 18 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws with a breach up to 2mm was 94% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (96%). The pooled proportion for cervical pedicle screws placed completely in the pedicle was 76% for navigated screws and did not differ from the pooled proportion for non-navigated screws (82%). Intraoperative screw reposition rates and screw revision rates as a result of postoperative imaging also did not differ between navigated and non-navigated screw placement. This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the use of spinal navigation systems does not significantly improve the accuracy of placement of cervical pedicle screws compared to screws placed without navigation. Future studies evaluating intraoperative navigation for cervical pedicle screw placement should focus on the learning curve, postoperative complications, and the complexity of surgical cases.

A novel radiographic analysis system for subaxial cervical spine pedicle screw placement

BackgroundPrecise pedicle screw placement of the subaxial cervical spine is difficult. Not every hospital is equipped with a guidance system that can provide effective help. Computed tomography (CT) scanning is almost a routine preoperative examination for cervical spine surgery in all hospitals. Appropriate measurement and analysis of the CT images could assist optimal cervical pedicle screw placement. The purpose of this study is to propose a new and universal method using computed tomography (CT) morphological parameters analysis to assist optimal cervical pedicle screw placement from C3 to C7.MethodsA localization system with six parameters was designed based on preoperative CT reconstruction to guide subaxial cervical spine pedicle screw placement. The six parameters were distance from the starting point to the midline [D1], distance from the starting point to the lower edge of the inferior articular process [D2], transverse section angle [TSA], sagittal section angle [SSA], pedicle width [PW], and pedicle height [PH]. The six parameters were analyzed in 53 participants.ResultsCombining D1 and D2 could localize the entrance of the pedicle screw, and we concluded that D1 and TSA and D2 and SSA could be a new standard for determination of the transverse and sagittal orientation of the pedicle screw. The six parameters were closely related to the patient’s gender, height, and weight. PH and PW were linearly correlated and could guide selection of the appropriate pedicle screw. SSA was an independent parameter of the relevant vertebral body, and changes in SSA had nothing to do with the curvature or posture of the cervical spine.ConclusionsUnderstanding and applying the six-parameter localization system are essential for achieving accurate and optimal pedicle screw placement in subaxial cervical spine, regardless of cervical sagittal alignment.

Operative Effect Comparison of Flexible Drill Guiding vs. Traditional Drill Guiding Template for Lower Cervical Pedicle Screw Insertion: A Retrospective Analysis.

Accurately inserting pedicle screws is the key point of posterior pedicle screw fixation for lower cervical spine (C3-C7) instability. 3D printing technology can improve the accuracy of screw placement. This study compared the safety of 3D-printed flexible drill guiding template vs. traditional rigid drill guiding template for lower cervical pedicle screw insertion. This was a retrospective study. A total of 34 patients who underwent lower cervical pedicle screw fixation from March 2018 to May 2021 were enrolled in this study, and they were divided into the flexible drill flexible drill group and the traditional drill group. A total of 18 patients in the flexible drill flexible drill group underwent pedicle screw fixation assisted by 3D printed flexible drill guiding templates for the lower cervix, and 16 patients in the traditional drill group underwent pedicle screw fixation assisted by 3D printed regular drill guiding templates for the lower cervix. The length of the incision and intraoperative blood loss during surgery were recorded and compared for the two groups. The grade, deviation of the screw entry point, deviation of the screw medial angle and screw length were measured and compared after surgery for the two groups by independent-sample tests. There was a significant difference in the length of the incision and blood loss between the two groups (P < 0.05). There was a significant difference between the two groups for grade (P = 0.016). The deviation of the screw entry point was 0.65 ± 0.50 mm in the flexible drill group and 0.78 ± 0.83 mm in the traditional drill group. The deviation of the screw medial angle was 2.14 ± 1.78 in the flexible drill group and 4.23 ± 2.51 in the traditional drill group, with a significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). Compared with regular guiding techniques, lower cervical pedicle screw placement assisted by multistep navigation templates and flexible K-wires results in less trauma and better safety.

O-arm real-time guidance in cervical pedicle screw fixation

To explore the technical aspects of the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement with O-arm guidance. The clinical data of 21 patients who underwent cervical pedicle screw fixation by O-arm real-time guidance from December 2015 to January 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. There were 15 males and 6 females, aged from 29 to 76 years old with an average of (45.3±11.5) years. The postoperative CT scan was utilized to evaluate the placement of the pedicle screw and classified according to the Gertzbein and Robbins classification. A total of 132 pedicle screws were implanted in 21 patients, 116 at C3-C6 and 16 at C1 and C2. According to Gertzbein & Robbins classification, the overall breach rates were found to be 11.36% (15/132) with 73.33% (11 screws) Grade B, 26.67% (4 screws) Grade C, and no Grade D or E screw breaches. There were no pedicle screw placement related complications at final follow-up. The application of O-arm real-time guidance technology can make cervical pedicle screw placement reliable. High accuracy and better intra-operative control can increase surgeon's confidence in using cervical pedicle instrumentation. Considering the high-risk nature of anatomical area around cervical pedicle and the possibility of catastrophic complications, the spine surgeon should have sufficient surgical skills, experience, ensures stringent verification of the system, and never relies solely on the navigation system.

Clinical application of spinal robot in cervical spine surgery: safety and accuracy of posterior pedicle screw placement in comparison with conventional freehand methods

The novel robot-assisted (RA) technique has been utilized increasingly to improve the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement. Although the clinical application of the RA technique has been investigated in several case series and comparative studies, the superiority and safety of RA over conventional freehand (FH) methods remain controversial. Meanwhile, the intra-pedicular accuracy of the two methods has not been compared for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. This study aimed to compare the rate and risk factors of intra-pedicular accuracy of RA versus the conventional FH approach for posterior pedicle screw placement in cervical traumatic diseases. A total of 52 patients with cervical traumatic diseases who received cervical screw placement using RA (26 patients) and FH (26 patients) techniques were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the intra-pedicular accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement according to the Gertzbin-Robbins scale. Secondary outcome parameters included surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. Moreover, the risk factors that possibly affected intra-pedicular accuracy were assessed using univariate analyses. Out of 52 screws inserted using the RA method, 43 screws (82.7%) were classified as grade A, with the remaining 7 (13.5%) and 2 (3.8%) screws classified as grades B and C. In the FH cohort, 60.8% of the 79 screws were graded A, with the remaining screws graded B (21, 26.6%), C (8, 10.1%), and D (2, 2.5%). The RA technique showed a significantly higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy than the FH method (P = 0.008), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinically acceptable accuracy (P = 0.161). Besides, the RA technique showed remarkably longer surgery time, less postoperative drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and equivalent intraoperative blood loss and complications than the FH technique. Furthermore, the univariate analyses showed that severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane (P = 0.003) and shorter width of the lateral mass at the inferior margin of the posterior arch (P = 0.014) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C1 screw placement. The diagnosis of HRVA (P < 0.001), severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane (P < 0.001), short pedicle width (P < 0.001), and short pedicle height (P < 0.001) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C2 screw placement. RA cervical pedicle screw placement was associated with a higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy to the FH technique for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. The severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane independently contributed to high rates of the inaccuracy of C1 and C2 screw placements. RA pedicle screw placement is safe and useful for cervical traumatic surgery.

662 Navigation in Cervical Spine Surgery: A Review of Past and Current Uses

INTRODUCTION: The last two decades in spine surgery have resulted in an expansion of innovation and new enabling technologies. Within those new developments, spinal navigation has been adopted widely. Nonetheless, the use in the cervical spine remains a less explored METHODS: A scoping review of the literature was performed via PubMed. Limited to English and no date limit. Different search queries with MesH terms such as “Surgical Navigation Systems" "Spatial Navigation”, "Surgery, Computer-Assisted”, "Cervical Vertebrae", “cervical spine” with combination of OR and AND. Inclusion criteria: articles discussing the use of any navigation platform in the cervical spine. RESULTS: A total of 365 articles were found. After title and abstract selection, a total of 87 articles were reviewed. All the articles were retrospective. A total of 2101 patients underwent cervical procedures with spinal navigation, 54% were male. Average age of the cohort was 53.6 years. The Stealth navigation system (Medtronic) was the most commonly used followed by BrainLab and the large majority used CT based navigation. Degenerative conditions were the most common followed by trauma. There were 1872 total screws placed under navigation. Most common use for navigation was placement of cervical pedicle screws with a range of pedicle screw accuracy from 76.5-97.1%. The most common level for misplacement was C4. Additional uses include occipital and C1-2 fusion, corpectomies, transoral, transnasal approaches, and tumor localization. Direct complications from screw placement: C5 palsy, vertebral artery injury and dural tears. Mean follow up was 22.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Spinal navigation in the cervical spine remains an understudied field. The current reports show good accuracy for placement of cervical pedicle screws, with minimal complications but other uses within the cervical spine remain somewhat limited. Given our evolving understanding of cervical pathology

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Morphometric Study and Anatomical Variation with its Incidence of Foramina Transversaria on the Lower Cervical Vertebrae

Anatomical variation of the foramina transversaria (FT) is associated with vertebral neurovascular symptoms and can cause complications after lower spine surgery, especially cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion. FT variation has been documented and classified in various populations, as this information can help increase cervical stability in subaxial vertebral surgery. Although the morphometry of the upper cervical spine in Thai populations has been reported, there have yet been no studies examining the features of FT. The FT of dried cervical spines (C3-C7; left and right side; n = 107, male = 53 and female = 54) were examined for morphological variation, and their anteroposterior (AP) and transverse (T) diameters were measured using a digital vernier caliper. Morphometric data and variations were compared by sex and lateral side. It was that the C3-C6 FT in both sexes were round, and the C7 FT was elliptical with an oblique right side. FT diameters did not differ significantly by sex except for the AP diameters of C6-C7 and for T diameters of C4 and C7. The left AP diameters of C3-C6 were significantly longer than the right, as were the T diameters of C4 and C7 FT. Additionally, T diameter was significantly longer than that of the AP, except that of the left C6 in male spines, which did not differ from the AP. Most FT examined were round. These findings should be considered in the provisional diagnosis of vertebral neurovascular symptoms caused by FT variation as well as that of neurovascular damage after cervical pedicle screw placement.

The role of cervical pedicle screw in cervical spine trauma: A single-center retrospective study.

Placement of pedicle screw in the subaxial cervical spine is a challenging and complex technique but provides significant biomechanical advantages. Despite its potential complications, the role and use of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) are growing. A literature review of the significant articles on applying pedicle screws in the subaxial cervical spine was done (articles between 1994 and 2020). Furthermore, our center´s experience of 15 years related to CPS is also discussed in this study. Transpedicular instrumentation in the subaxial cervical spine requires profound anatomical knowledge and meticulous surgical technique. This technique provides superior biomechanical stability compared to the other cervical fixation techniques. Pull-out strength of CPS is twice as compared to the lateral mass screws. There have been numerous variations in the technique of CPS, varying from open techniques to minimally invasive and the use of biomodels and templates during this procedure. Clinically, CPS can be used in different cervical trauma situations, such as fracture-dislocations, floating lateral mass, and fractures associated with ankylosing spondylitis. Despite the possibility of neurovascular injury due to the proximity of the vertebral artery, spinal cord, and spinal nerves to the cervical pedicles, scientific literature, and our center × s experience show low risk, and this technique can be performed safely. CPS placement is a safe procedure, and it has great potential in the management of cervical spine trauma.

Patient-Specific Drill Guide Template for Pedicle Screw Insertion into the Atlantoaxial Cervical Spine Using Stereolithographic Modeling: An In Vitro Study.

Cadaveric study. This study aimed to assess the accuracy and feasibility of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) insertion into the atlantoaxial cervical spine using a patient-specific drill guide template constructed from a stereolithographic model. CPS fixation is a widely accepted procedure for posterior cervical fixation because of its biomechanical advantages, particularly in the subaxial cervical region. The extremely narrow corridors of the atlantoaxial spine make CPS insertion more difficult, requiring the development of new tools to ensure accurate placement. Fifteen atlantoaxial cervical vertebra specimens from 15 cadavers were scanned into thin slices using computed tomography. Images of the cadaver spine were digitally processed and rendered stl files so that they could be printed to scale as threedimensional (3D) plastic models. Manually molded dental acrylic drill guide templates with pins inserted in the pedicles of the plastic cervical models were placed over the 3D printed models. The drill guide templates were used for precise placement of the drill holes in the pedicles of cadaveric specimens for pedicle screw fixation. The accuracy of screw placement was evaluated by an independent evaluator. A total of 60 pedicles (combined C1 and C2) from 15 cadaveric axial cervical vertebrae were evaluated. The total acceptable accuracy for pedicle screw insertion in the atlantoaxial cervical vertebrae is 95%. An accuracy rate of 100% was achieved for C1 while an acceptable accuracy rate of 90% was achieved for C2. The use of a patient-specific drill guide constructed using stereolithography improved the accuracy of CPS placement in a cadaveric model.

Freehand Regional Techniques for Subaxial Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement.

Although various subaxial cervical pedicle screw implantation techniques have been proposed, clinical operators have been unable to exactly determine the entry points and trajectory . The objective of this article is to propose freehand regional techniques (FRT) for subaxial cervical pedicle screw placements and to investigate the clinical effectiveness of FRT. A total of 80 consecutive patients who underwent open subaxial cervical pedicle screw fixation using FRT from January 2015 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed, and preoperative cervical computed tomography (CT) images were used to observe the entry point and screw trajectory. The horizontal and vertical lines at the center of the cervical lateral mass was marked, and the entry point was chosen at the outer upper quadrant of the lateral mass. Both sagittal and axial trajectories were determined by CT images, generally perpendicular to the cervical laminae. Screw implantation accuracy was assessed using postoperative CT. After virtually inserting pedicle screws by FRT on preoperative cervical CT images, all of the entry points were located in the outer upper quadrant of the lateral mass and the trajectory perpendicular to the cervical laminae was just parallel to the pedicle's axis. A total of 694 pedicle screws were placed by FRT clinically, with a 96% accuracy rate. Pedicle screw implantation by FRT for subaxial cervical spine can be performed with acceptable safety and accuracy.

Ultrasound Image Guided and Mixed Reality-Based Surgical System With Real-Time Soft Tissue Deformation Computing for Robotic Cervical Pedicle Screw Placement.

Cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement surgery remains technically demanding due to the complicated anatomy with neurovascular structures. State-of-the-art surgical navigation or robotic systems still suffer from the problem of hand-eye coordination and soft tissue deformation. In this study, we aim at tracking the intraoperative soft tissue deformation and constructing a virtual-physical fusion surgical scene, and integrating them into the robotic system for CPS placement surgery. Firstly, we propose a real-time deformation computation method based on the prior shape model and intraoperative partial information acquired from ultrasound images. According to the generated posterior shape, the structure representation of deformed target tissue gets updated continuously. Secondly, a hand tremble compensation method is proposed to improve the accuracy and robustness of the virtual-physical calibration procedure, and a mixed reality based surgical scene is further constructed for CPS placement surgery. Thirdly, we integrate the soft tissue deformation method and virtual-physical fusion method into our previously proposed surgical robotic system, and the surgical workflow for CPS placement surgery is introduced. We conducted phantom and animal experiments to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of the proposed system. Our system yielded a mean surface distance error of 1.52 ± 0.43 mm for soft tissue deformation computing, and an average distance deviation of 1.04 ± 0.27 mm for CPS placement. Results demonstrate that our system involves tremendous clinical application potential. Our proposed system promotes the efficiency and safety of the CPS placement surgery.

O-Arm Navigated Cervical Pedicle Screw Fixation in the Treatment of Lower Cervical Fracture-Dislocation.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of cervical pedicle screw (CPS) placement with O‐arm navigation in the treatment of lower cervical fracture‐dislocation.MethodsA retrospective clinical study was performed involving 42 consecutive patients with lower cervical spine fracture‐dislocation who underwent CPS fixation surgery with O‐arm navigation (CPS group) or received conventional lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation surgery (LMS group) between August 2015 and August 2019. Accuracy of CPS position was evaluated by postoperative CT. The clinical parameters including preoperative and final follow‐up Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, preoperative Sub‐axial Injury Classification (SLIC) score, number of fixation segments, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, injury mechanism, injury location, surgical complications were also assessed between the two groups.ResultsIn LMS group, the preoperative SLIC score was 7.5 ± 0.9, ASIA score improvement was 0.8 ± 0.5, JOA score improvement was 3.0 ± 1.8, mean operation time was 204 ± 89 min, intraoperative blood loss was 311 ± 127 ml. In CPS group, the preoperative SLIC score was 7.3 ± 1.2, ASIA score improvement was 0.9 ± 0.5, JOA score improvement was 3.2 ± 2.4, mean operation time is 241 ± 85 min, intraoperative blood loss is about 327 ± 120 ml. There was no significant difference in terms of above clinical parameters between the two groups (P > 0.05), the fixation segments in CPS group (3.5 ± 1.1) were less than that in LMS group (4.2 ± 0.7) (P = 0.037). The accuracy of CPS insertion was evaluated based on postoperative CT. Of all the 118 CPSs, 83 (70.3%) were defined as Grade 0; 27 (22.9%) as Grade 1; eight (6.8%) as Grade 2; and none as Grade 3. CPS malposition rate in this study was 6.8%. In this study, there was no direct intraoperative or postoperative complication caused by CPS or LMS insertion. All the operations were successfully completed in two groups. One of the patients in LMS group presented cerebrospinal fluid leak caused by bone fragment broken of the dural sac, which led to delayed incision healing. CPS group and LMS group both had two patients who suffered pulmonary infection after surgery. A total of 78.6% of the patients showed evidence of neurologic recovery. Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all cases and maintained throughout the follow‐up duration.ConclusionIn the treatment of lower cervical spine fracture‐dislocation, cervical pedicle screw insertion with O‐arm navigation is a safe and effective method for posterior fixation.