Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment Research Articles

The Impact of Preprocedural Platelet Function Testing on Periprocedural Complication Rates Associated With Pipeline Flow Diversion: An International Multicenter Study.

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to minimize the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with aneurysm embolization using pipeline embolization device (PED). We aimed to assess the impact of platelet function testing (PFT) on reducing periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with PED flow diversion in patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel. Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms requiring PED flow diversion were identified from 13 centers for retrospective evaluation. Clinical variables including the results of PFT before treatment, periprocedural DAPT regimen, and intracranial complications occurring within 72 h of embolization were identified. Complication rates were compared between PFT and non-PFT groups. Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher exact, or χ 2 tests. A P -value <.05 was statistically significant. 580 patients underwent PED embolization with 262 patients dichotomized to the PFT group and 318 patients to the non-PFT group. 13.7% of PFT group patients were clopidogrel nonresponders requiring changes in their pre-embolization DAPT regimen. Five percentage of PFT group [2.8%, 8.5%] patients experienced thromboembolic complications vs 1.6% of patients in the non-PFT group [0.6%, 3.8%] ( P = .019). Two (15.4%) PFT group patients with thromboembolic complications experienced permanent neurological disability vs 4 (80%) non-PFT group patients. 3.7% of PFT group patients [1.5%, 8.2%] and 3.5% [1.8%, 6.3%] of non-PFT group patients experienced hemorrhagic intracranial complications ( P > .9). Preprocedural PFT before PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms in patients premedicated with an aspirin and clopidogrel DAPT regimen may not be necessary to significantly reduce the risk of procedure-related intracranial complications.

Spontaneous delayed migration or shortening after pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysm: Incidence, management, and risk factors

BackgroundStudies reporting spontaneous delayed migration or shortening (SDMS) after treatment with the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of SDMS after PED treatment,...

Treatment of intracranial aneurysms with pipeline embolization device: a single-center experience.

Endovascular therapy is the primary treatment modality for intracranial aneurysms (IA). The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of a pipeline embolization device (PED) for the treatment of IA. This retrospective study was conducted at a single center. Data were collected for all patients who underwent PED treatment at the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between December 2018 and January 2022. Clinical characteristics, aneurysm-related characteristics, treatment details, and clinical and imaging outcomes were collected and analyzed. A total of 60 consecutive patients with 60 IAs were treated with a PED. The mean age of the participants was 61.8 years, with 53% being female. The average size of the aneurysms was 14.7 mm, with 54 located in the anterior circulation and six in the posterior circulation. The median last follow-up time was 13.0 months (range, 11-24 months). All patients underwent final digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for angiographic follow-up, and 50 aneurysms (83.3%) were completely occluded. The overall complication rate was 3.3%, and there were no reported mortalities. Among the 12 cases of ruptured aneurysms, all of which underwent adjunctive coil embolization, the complete occlusion rate was 91.7% with a complication rate of 16.6% [ischemic complication and modified Rankin scale (mRS) deteriorated]. In the 6 cases of posterior circulation aneurysms (2 in the basilar artery), 5 cases achieved complete occlusion and 1 case achieved near-complete occlusion, with no reported complications or mortality. The use of PEDs appears to be an effective treatment option for IA, demonstrating high occlusion rates and low complication rates. While the application of PEDs for the treatment of ruptured aneurysms did not increase the risk of secondary aneurysm rupture, caution is still warranted due to a higher complication rate. In the treatment of aneurysms of the vertebrobasilar artery using PEDs, this study achieved favorable efficacy outcomes without complications nor patient mortality. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings.

Predictors of In-Stent Stenosis Following the Implantation of Pipeline Embolization Devices for the Treatment of Aneurysms Located at or beyond the Circle of Willis in the Anterior Circulation.

In-stent stenosis is commonly observed after stent implantation. There is no consensus on the contributing factors for in-stent stenosis, especially for aneurysms located at or beyond the circle of Willis in the anterior circulation. This study aimed to investigate the morbidity and determinants of in-stent stenosis in distal anterior circulation aneurysms following the implantation of Pipeline Embolization Devices. Patients who underwent Pipeline Embolization Device treatment at our center between January 1, 2018, and June 15, 2023, were enrolled. Distal anterior circulation aneurysms were defined as those occurring at or beyond the circle of Willis, including anterior communicating artery aneurysms, anterior cerebral artery aneurysms, and MCA aneurysms. Baseline information, aneurysm characteristics, and follow-up data of patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the in-stent stenosis group (patients with a loss of >25% of the lumen diameter of the parent artery) and the non-in-stent stenosis group. Binary logistic regression and restricted cubic spline curves were used to explore risk factors. We included 85 cases of 1213 patients treated with flow-diverter devices at our hospital. During an average follow-up period of 9.07 months, the complete occlusion rate was 77.64%. The overall incidence of in-stent stenosis was 36.47% (31/85), of which moderate stenosis accounted for 9.41% (8/85), and severe stenosis, 5.88% (5/85) (triglyceride-glucose index ≥ 8.95; OR = 6.883, P = .006). The difference in diameters between the stent and parent artery of ≥0.09 mm (OR = 6.534, P = .015) and 55 years of age or older (OR = 3.507, P = .036) were risk factors for in-stent stenosis. The restricted cubic spline curves indicated that the risk of in-stent stenosis increased as the difference in diameter between stent and parent artery and the triglyceride-glucose index increased. Compared with the on-label use of Pipeline Embolization Devices, the rate of in-stent stenosis did not obviously increase when treating distal anterior circulation aneurysms with these devices. The incidence of in-stent stenosis was 36.47% when defined as a lumen diameter loss of >25%, and 15.2% when defined as a lumen diameter loss of >50%. Stent-size selection and biochemical indicators can potentially impact the incidence of in-stent stenosis.

Second-stage pipeline embolization device treatment with coil embolization for large cerebral aneurysm prevents silent diffusion-weighted image ischemic infarction: a retrospective study

BackgroundSecond-stage flow diversion with coil embolization may improve occlusion outcomes and reduce periprocedural complications in patients with cerebral aneurysm. However, the actual cause behind this is unclear. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of second-stage pipeline embolization device (PED) and single-stage PED with coil embolization.ResultsOf the 22 treated patients with aneurysm, 10 and 12 were treated with second-stage PED and single-stage PED with coil embolization, respectively. The mean follow-up duration was 29.6 months. The mean numbers of diffusion-weighted image (DWI)-positive spots on day 1 post-procedure were 4.9 and 10.8 in the second-stage and single-stage PED with coil embolization groups, respectively (P = 0.01). Deterioration of the modified Rankin scale score was not ≥ 2 in any patient during follow-up in the second-stage PED group but was observed in 16.7% of cases (2/12) in the single-stage PED with coil embolization group (P = 0.48). On follow-up angiography, complete occlusion was observed in all patients (10/10) in the second-stage PED group and 66.7% (8/12) in the single-stage PED with coil embolization group (P = 0.09).ConclusionsThe second-stage PED strategy significantly reduces the number of DWI high-intensity spots, leading to the prevention of ischemic complications. This strategy may help to prevent complications and reduce morbidity.

Predicting Persistent Aneurysm Filling After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment in Patients with Intracranial Aneurysm: Development and External Validation of a Nomogram Model

Predicting Persistent Aneurysm Filling After Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment in Patients with Intracranial Aneurysm: Development and External Validation of a Nomogram Model

AneuGuide™ software-assisted vs. manual measurements in sizing for pipeline embolization device: An agreement study

Sizing of flow diverters (FDs) is a challenging task in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms due to their foreshortening behavior. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the difference between the sizing results from the AneuGuide™ software and from conventional 2D measurement. Ninety-eight consecutive patients undergoing pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment between October 2018 and April 2023 in the First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital (Beijing, China) were retrospectively analyzed. For all cases, the optimal PED dimensions were both manually determined through 2D measurements on pre-treatment 3D-DSA and computed by AneuGuide™ software. The inter-rater reliability between the two sets of sizing results for each methodology was analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The degree of agreement between manual sizing and software sizing were analyzed with the Bland-Altman plot and Pearson's test. Differences between two methodologies were analyzed with Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05. There was better inter-rater reliability between AneuGuide™ measurements both for diameter (ICC 0.92, 95%CI 0.88–0.95) and length (ICC 0.93, 95%CI 0.89–0.96). Bland-Altman plots showed a good agreement for diameter selection between two methodologies. However, the median length proposed by software group was significantly shorter (16 mm versus 20 mm, p < 0.001). No difference was found for median diameter (4.25 mm versus 4.25 mm). We demonstrated that the AneuGuide™ software provides highly reliable results of PED sizing compared with manual measurement, with a shorter stent length. AneuGuide™ may aid neurointerventionalists in selecting optimal dimensions for FD treatment.

Abstract 168: Platelet function testing and risk of periprocedural complications with flow diversion: An international multicenter study

Introduction Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is necessary to minimize the risk of periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with aneurysm embolization using Pipeline embolization device (PED). We sought to assess the impact of platelet function testing (PFT) on reducing periprocedural thromboembolic complications associated with PED flow diversion in patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel. Methods Patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms requiring PED flow diversion were identified from 13 centers for retrospective evaluation. Clinical variables including the results of PFT prior to treatment, periprocedural DAPT regimen, and intracranial complications occurring within 72‐hours of embolization were identified from the medical record. Complication rates were compared between PFT and non‐PFT groups. Differences between groups were tested for statistical significance using the Wilcoxon rank sum, Fisher exact, or Chi‐square tests. A p‐value &lt;0.05 was statistically significant. Results 580 patients underwent PED embolization with 262 patients dichotomized to the PFT group and 318 patients to the non‐PFT group. 13.7% of PFT group patients were clopidogrel non‐responders requiring changes in their pre‐embolization DAPT regimen. 5% of PFT group patients experienced thromboembolic complications versus 1.6% of patients in the non‐PFT group (p=0.019). Two (15.4%) PFT group patients with thromboembolic complications experienced permanent neurological disability versus 4 (80%) non‐PFT group patients. 2.2% of PFT group patients and 3.5% of non‐PFT group patients experienced hemorrhagic intracranial complications (p&gt;0.9). Conclusion Pre‐procedural PFT prior to PED treatment of intracranial aneurysms in patients pre‐medicated with an aspirin and clopidogrel DAPT regimen may not be necessary to significantly reduce the risk of procedure‐related intracranial complications.

Abstract 174: Treatment of Unruptured Saccular Aneurysms with PED: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of Long‐Term Outcomes

Introduction The Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) is commonly used for intracranial aneurysm treatment. While its effectiveness for certain types of aneurysms is well‐established, its efficacy for saccular aneurysms remains debatable. This review and meta‐analysis aimed to assess the long‐term outcomes of PED treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA). Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Studies with at least one year of follow‐up after PED treatment for saccular aneurysms were included. The primary endpoint was angiographic complete aneurysm occlusion at long‐term (≥ 12 mo.) follow‐up. Secondary outcomes included long‐term complications. We conducted a meta‐regression analysis to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity across studies. Results Eleven studies on 594 patients with 726 aneurysms were included, of which 5% were previously treated. The mean age was 55.7 years, and 78.3% were women. The mean aneurysm size was 7.72 mm, 8.95% were treated with more than one device, and 2.9% had adjunct coiling. The long‐term complete occlusion rate was 81% (CI 95%: 72% to 88%, p&lt;0.01). Regarding long‐term complications, the rate of symptomatic ischemic stroke was 1% (CI 95%: 0% to 4%, p=0.07), the rate of delayed rupture was 1% (95%, CI 0% to 3%, p=0.02), and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 3% (CI 95%: 1% to 6%, p=0.81). The meta‐regression analysis revealed a decreasing trend per year for aneurysmal occlusion, ischemic stroke rate, and aneurysmal rupture rate over time and an increasing trend for ICH over time. Conclusion PED demonstrates high long‐term occlusion and low complication rates, suggesting it is a safe and effective treatment option for unruptured intracranial saccular aneurysms. However, studies with greater than 5‐10 years of follow‐up are needed to evaluate the clinical and radiographical outcomes of incompletely occluded aneurysms Additionally, as newer devices exhibit reduced thrombogenic profiles and ICH rates increase over time, reevaluation of antiplatelet therapy's role, including dosage and DAPT, is warranted.

Safety and efficacy of the pipeline embolization device for treatment of small vs. large aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Flow diversion with the pipeline embolization device (PED) is increasingly used to treat intracranial aneurysms with high obliteration rates and low morbidity. However, long-term (≥ 1year) angiographic and clinical outcomes still require further investigation. The aim of this study was to compare the occlusion and complication rates for small (< 10mm) versus large (10-25mm) aneurysms at long-term following treatment with PED. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed in compliance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. We conducted a comprehensive search of English language databases including Ovid MEDLINE and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process, and Daily, Ovid EMBASE, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus. Our studies included a minimum of 10 patients treated with PED for small vs. large aneurysms and with at least 12months of follow-up. The primary safety endpoint was the rate of clinical complications measured by the occurrence of symptomatic stroke (confirmed clinically and radiographically), intracranial hemorrhage, or aneurysmal rupture. The primary efficacy endpoint was the complete aneurysm occlusion rate. Our analysis included 19 studies with 1277 patients and 1493 aneurysms. Of those, 1378 aneurysms met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 53.9years, and most aneurysms were small (89.75%; N = 1340) in women (79.1%; N = 1010). The long-term occlusion rate was 73% (95%, CI 65 to 80%) in small compared to 84% (95%, CI 76 to 90%) in large aneurysms (p < 0.01). The symptomatic thromboembolic complication rate was 5% (95%, CI 3 to 9%) in small compared to 7% (95%, CI 4 to 13%) in large aneurysms (p = 0.01). The rupture rate was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.92), and the rate of intracranial hemorrhage was 2% vs. 4% (p = 0.96) for small vs. large aneurysms, respectively; however, these differences were not statistically significant. The long-term occlusion rate after PED treatment is higher in large vs. small aneurysms. Symptomatic thromboembolic rates with stroke are also higher in large vs. small aneurysms. The difference in the rates of aneurysm rupture and intracranial hemorrhage was insignificant. Although the PED seems a safe and effective treatment for small and large aneurysms, further studies are required to clarify how occlusion rate and morbidity are affected by aneurysm size.

Predictors of aneurysmal occlusion following intracranial aneurysms treatment with pipeline embolization device.

Pipeline embolization device (PED) is thought to induce aneurysmal occlusion through diversion of flow away from the aneurysmal sac with subsequent thrombosis and endothelialization. The impact of different factors especially hypertension (HTN)-a known predisposing factor to hypercoagulability and altered endothelial function-on aneurysmal occlusion after flow diversion has not been studied. We sought to determine predictors of aneurysmal occlusion following PED treatment focusing on impact of blood pressure. Database of patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with PED from 2013 to 2019 at our institution was retrospectively reviewed. Patients were defined as hypertensive if (1) they had a documented history of HTN requiring anti-HTN medications or (2) average systolic blood pressure on three measurements was > 130mmHg. The primary outcome was aneurysm occlusion status at the last imaging follow-up. Multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to assess the effect of HTN on occlusion, controlling for age, smoking, aneurysmal size, fusiform morphology, posterior circulation location, and incorporated branches. A total of 331 aneurysms in 294 patients were identified for this analysis. The mean age was 59years (79.9% female). Fifty-five percent of the cohort were classified as hypertensive. When controlling for other potential confounders, hypertensive patients trended toward higher odds of achieving complete occlusion compared to non-hypertensive patients (OR = 2.05; 95% CI = 0.99-4.25; p = 0.052). Meanwhile, age (OR = 0.91; 95% CI = 0.88-0.95; p < 0.001) and an incorporated branch into an aneurysm (OR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.08-0.58; p < 0.002) were associated with decreased odds for complete aneurysmal occlusion. Hypertensive patients show a trend toward higher odds of achieving complete occlusion when controlling for potential confounders. The HTN-induced hypercoagulable state, enhanced endothelial activation, and altered extracellular matrix regulation might be the contributing factors. Further research is warranted to explore clinical implications of these findings.

Pipeline Embolization Device for intracranial aneurysms presenting with mass effect: a large Chinese cohort

BackgroundUnruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment aims to reduce the risk of aneurysm rupture and bleeding, relieves symptoms and improve the quality of life for patients. This study aimed to assess the...

Effect of Statin on Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated With Pipeline Embolization: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

Studies have shown that use of statin can improve radiographic and clinical outcomes in patients receiving treatment for coronary artery or peripheral vascular stenosis. Statins are thought to be effective by reducing arterial wall inflammation. The same mechanism may have an influence on the efficacy of pipeline embolization device (PED) for intracranial aneurysm treatment. Although this question has been of interest, there is a lack of well-controlled data in the literature. The objective of this study is to analyze the effect of statins on outcomes of aneurysms treated with pipeline embolization through propensity score matching. Patients who underwent PED for unruptured intracranial aneurysms at our institution between 2013 and 2020 were identified. Patients on statin treatment vs those who were not were matched through propensity score by controlling for confounding factors including age, sex, current smoking status, diabetes, aneurysm morphology, volume, neck size, location of aneurysm, history of treatment for the same aneurysm, type of antiplatelet therapy, and elapsed time at last follow-up. Occlusion status at first follow up and last follow-up, and incidence of in-stent stenosis and ischemic complications during the follow-up period were extracted for comparison. In total, 492 patients with PED were identified, of whom 146 were on statin therapy and 346 were not. After one-to-one nearest neighbor matching, 49 cases in each group were compared. At last follow-up, 79.6%, 10.2%, and 10.2% of cases in the statin therapy group and 67.4%, 16.3%, and 16.3% in the nonstatin group were noted to have Raymond-Roy 1, 2, and 3 occlusions, respectively ( P = .45). No significant difference was observed in immediate procedural thrombosis ( P > .99), long-term in-stent stenosis ( P > .99), ischemic stroke ( P = .62), or retreatment ( P = .49). Statin use does not affect occlusion rate or clinical outcomes in patients treated with PED treatment for unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device treatments for intradural internal carotid artery aneurysms in a single center in a Japanese population.

The pipeline embolization device (PED) is the most common flow diverter device in the world. To date, there have been no reports of treatment outcomes specific to intradural internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysms. The safety and efficacy of the PED treatments for intradural ICA aneurysms are reported. 131 patients with 133 aneurysms underwent PED treatments for intradural ICA aneurysms. The mean aneurysm dome size and neck length were 12.7 ± 4.3 mm and 6.1 ± 2.2 mm, respectively. We used adjunctive endosaccular coil embolization for 88 aneurysms (66.2%). A total of 113 aneurysms (85%) were angiographically followed up 6 months following the procedure, and 93 aneurysms (69.9%) were followed up for 1 year. The angiographic outcome at 6 months showed that 94 (83.2%) aneurysms had O'Kelly-Marotta (OKM) grade D, 6 (5.3%) had C, 10 (8.8%) had B, and 3 (2.7%) had A. At 1 year, 82 (88.2%) aneurysms had OKM grade D, 6 (6.5%) had C, 3 (3.2%) had B, and 2 (2.2%) had A. Multivariate analysis showed that aneurysm neck size and adjunctive coiling were statistically significant in aneurysm occlusion status. Major morbidity modified Rankin Scale >2 and mortality rates related to procedures were 3.0% and 0%, respectively. Delayed aneurysm ruptures were not observed. These results reveal that PED treatment of intradural ICA aneurysms is safe and efficacious. The combined use of adjunctive coil embolization not only prevents delayed aneurysm ruptures but also contributes to an increase in the rate of complete occlusion.

Long-term outcomes and dynamic changes of in-stent stenosis after Pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms

BackgroundFlow diverters have revolutionized the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, the delayed complications associated with flow diverter use are unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the incidence, severity, clinical outcomes, risk factors, and dynamic...

Could statin improve outcomes after pipeline embolization for intracranial aneurysms in a real-world setting?

Several pharmacological pathways have revealed statin to have a positive role in patients with for intracranial aneurysms. However, prior studies regarding the association between statin use and patients' outcomes after pipeline embolization device (PED) treatment were not completely supportive. To investigate whether statin medication following PED treatment would improve the outcomes of intracranial aneurysm patients in a real-world setting. A retrospective multicenter cohort study. Patients were selected from the PLUS registry study conducted from November 2014 to October 2019 across 14 centers in China. The population was divided into two groups: those who received statin medication after the PED treatment and those who did not receive statin medication after PED treatment. Study outcomes included angiographic evaluation of aneurysm occlusion, parent arteries stenosis, ischemic and hemorrhage complications, all-cause mortality, neurologic mortality, and functional outcome. 1087 patients with 1168 intracranial aneurysms were eligible; 232 patients were in the statin user group and the other 855 were in the non-statin user group. For the statin user group versus the non-statin user group, no significant difference was found for the primary outcomes of complete occlusion of aneurysm (82.4% versus 84.2%; p = 0.697). Of the secondary outcomes, none had a significant difference including stenosis of parent arteries ≥ 50% (1.4% versus 2.3%; p = 0.739), total subarachnoid hemorrhage (0.9% versus 2.5%; p = 0.215), all-cause mortality (0.0% versus 1.9%; p = 0.204), neurologic mortality (0.0% versus 1.6%; p = 0.280), excellent (95.5% versus 97.2%; p = 0.877), and favorable (98.9% versus 98.4%; p = 0.933) functional outcomes. The total ischemic complication rate (9.0% versus 7.1%; p = 0.401) was higher but not significant in the statin user group. The propensity score-matched cohort showed similar results. Results of binary multivariable logistic regression analysis and propensity score-matched analysis both showed that statin usage was not independently associated with an increased rate of complete occlusion or any other secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis found the same result in patients who did not use statin before the procedure. Among patients with intracranial aneurysms, statin use after the PED treatment was not significantly associated with better angiographic and clinical outcomes. Well-designed studies are needed to further confirm this finding.

Effects of different stent size selection on pipeline embolization device treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

Pipeline embolization device (PED) is becoming increasingly common in therapeutic practice. In idealized model studies, treatment effectiveness may vary with different stent sizes in the same vasculature. The true effect of stent size selection in the clinical setting remains unknown, however. To determine the true effect of stent size selection in the clinical setting. It is a retrospective review. A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive patients with aneurysms treated with a PED at our institution. The primary exposures were the difference between the diameter of the stent and the parent artery (DD) and the difference between the length of the stent and the aneurysm neck (DL). The outcomes were the clinical and angiographic results, perioperative complications, balloon application, and in-stent stenosis. The results were generated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression and restricted cubic spline (RCS) curves. A larger DD was significantly associated with incomplete occlusion [odds ratio (OR) = 2.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.43-3.98; p < 0.001], while a larger DL was significantly associated with balloon application (OR = 1.12; 95% CI = 1.02-1.23; p = 0.021) and in-stent stenosis (>25%) (OR = 1.07; 95% CI = 1.01-1.16; p = 0.042). The RCS curve indicated that the risk of incomplete occlusion increased as the DD became larger, the possibility of balloon application increased as the DL increased when the DL was >5.7 mm, and the risk of in-stent stenosis (>25%) increased as the DL increased. In the clinical setting, stent selection was associated with treatment effectiveness and may add to the treatment burden. These occurrences should be considered for aneurysms treated with PED.

Treatment Outcomes of 94 Cases of Pipeline Embolization Device in a Single Center: Predictive Factors of Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion.

This study aimed to report the outcome of an endovascular treatment with a pipeline embolization device (PED) at a single center. We also examined the predictive factors for an incomplete occlusion after the PED placement. The subjects were 94 patients with 109 aneurysms who underwent the PED placement at our single center from June 2015 to September 2022. As treatment outcomes, we investigated the PED placement success rate, perioperative morbidity and mortality, postoperative cranial nerve improvement rate, and the classification of angiographic result at 6 months after the PED placement. Furthermore, the predictors of an incomplete occlusion were investigated in detail. One hundred nine aneurysms locations were: C1 (9), C2 (30), C3 (15), C4 (53), and C5 (2) in the internal carotid artery segments. Perioperative morbidity, including the asymptomatic ones, occurred in 10 cases (10.6%). Among these 10 cases, the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) improved to preoperative mRS after 90 days in 9 cases except 1 case. On the other hand, no perioperative mortality was observed. The postoperative cranial nerve improvement rate was 84.4%, and 61.7% of patients had a complete occlusion in the follow-up angiography, 6 months after the PED placement. Predictive factors for an incomplete occlusion after the PED placement were the elderly aged 70 years or older (P-value = 0.0214), the elderly aged 75 years or older (P-value = 0.0009), and the use of anticoagulants (P-value = 0.0388) in an univariate analysis. Further, the multivariate analysis revealed that the elderly aged 75 years or older was a predictive factor of an incomplete occlusion in this study. We summarized the outcomes of the PED treatment at our single center. In this study, the elderly aged 75 years or older was a predictive factor of an incomplete occlusion after the PED placement.

The off-label uses of pipeline embolization device for complex cerebral aneurysms: Mid-term follow-up in a single center.

To describe the off-label uses of pipeline embolization device for a variety of types of aneurysms including ruptured aneurysms, posterior circulation aneurysms, small aneurysms, distal aneurysms, and recurrent aneurysms. Clinical and angiographic data of patients who underwent pipeline embolization device treatment on off-label use at our center were retrospectively reviewed. For categorical variables, Fisher's exact test was used, and a two-sample Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for patients' age to analyze the correlation with outcomes. In this study, 121 aneurysms in 107 patients received off-label pipeline embolization device treatments. The overall rate of complete aneurysm occlusion was 77.8% (28/36 in 35 patients) for posterior circulation aneurysms and 95.3% (81/85 in 72 patients) for anterior circulation aneurysms. The posterior circulation aneurysms have a lower rate of aneurysm occlusion (p = 0.0372). The small aneurysms have a higher rate of aneurysm occlusion (p = 0.0104). The patient's sex, age, and aneurismal size were associated with ischemic stroke complications (p = 0.0397, 0.0166, and 0.0178). In posterior circulation aneurysm patients, only two basilar apex aneurysms underwent pipeline embolization device treatment, both of whom died of thrombotic complications. There was no difference in mortality between posterior circulation aneurysm patients (8.6%, 3/35) and anterior circulation aneurysm patients (1.4%, 1/72) (p = 0.1015). Patients of older age have a higher risk of death rate (p = 0.0053). The off-label use of pipeline embolization device is often performed in clinical practice and can achieve efficacy in complex aneurysms. The off-label use of pipeline embolization device was found to carry an increased rate of mortality in older patients. Excluding basilar apex aneurysms, the pipeline embolization device is as safe as anterior circulation aneurysms in the treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms elsewhere.

Treatment of giant intracranial aneurysms using the Pipeline flow-diverting stent: Long-term results from the International Retrospective Study of the Pipeline Embolization Device (IntrePED) study.

Traditional endovascular treatments of giant intracranial aneurysms are associated with high rates of complications and retreatment. Our objective was to examine the safety and long-term efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device for treatment of these aneurysms. This retrospective study using the IntrePED database included all patients with giant intracranial aneurysms treated with the Pipeline device between July 2008 and February 2013. Efficacy outcomes were stratified by using the Raymond-Roy Occlusion Classification. Predefined safety outcomes included spontaneous rupture of the target aneurysm; ipsilateral intracranial hemorrhage; ischemic stroke; parent artery stenosis; and sustained cranial neuropathy. Sixty-six embolizations were performed to treat 63 giant intracranial aneurysms (including 2 ruptured): 49 (77.8%) in the anterior and 14 (22.2%) in the posterior circulation. The median follow-up was 22.4 (0.1-60.5) months. Class I angiographic occlusion was achieved in 72.0% (36/50). The neurological morbidity/mortality rate was 23.8% (15/63), with higher rates in the posterior circulation than in the anterior circulation (22.4% vs. 28.6%). Among seven deaths, five had neurological causes. The procedure-related neurological morbidity and mortality rates were 22.7% (15/66) and 7.6% (5/66), respectively. The spontaneous rupture rate was 4.5% (3/66). Two spontaneous ruptures (1 death), 4/4 postprocedural intracranial hemorrhages, and 6/9 ischemic events occurred within 30 days. In-stent stenosis and new-onset cranial neuropathy were not observed during the angiographic follow-up period. Although procedure-related neurological morbidity/mortality rates were not insignificant, this study confirms the feasibility and long-term efficacy of the Pipeline Embolization Device to treat giant intracranial aneurysms.