Nongame wildlife responses to chaining of pinyon-juniper (Pinus edulis-Juniperus osteosperma) woodland were studied in 1977 in the Piceance Basin, Colorado. Vegetation and small-mammal populations were sampled on a mature pinyon-juniper woodland (control) and areas chained 1, 8, and 15 years previously. Breeding-bird populations were studied on the areas chained 8 and 15 years previously, the control area, and on the edge between a mature woodland and an area chained 10 years previously. Ten species of breeding birds were observed on the unchained area, whereas only 3 and 4 species were observed on the 8and 15-year-old chained areas, respectively. Bird densities on the unchained area (29 territories/10 ha) were more than double those on the chained areas (11/10 ha). Five of 17 species breeding on the edge area used both vegetation types. Only 1 species was found exclusively on the edge area. Small mammals were more abundant on chained than unchained areas. Species composition of the catch varied among the chained and unchained areas; species diversity was greatest on the unchained area. Adverse effects on nongame wildlife could be minimized by favoring survival of shrubs and young trees, retaining selected cavity trees, and limiting widths of clearings when chaining pinyon-juniper. J. WILDL. MANAGE. 45(2):381-389 Pinyon-juniper woodlands dominate over 200,000 km2 of the southwestern United States (Lanner 1975). Vast areas of these woodlands have been cleared over the past 30 years to stimulate production of forage for big game and livestock. Chaining (dragging a heavy anchor chain between 2 bulldozers) has been and remains a method widely used for clearing tracts of pinyon-juniper (Short and McCulloch 1977). Major coal and oil shale deposits occur in the pinyon-juniper ecosystem. Mining of these deposits will result in appreciable impacts on local wildlife populations. Pinyon-juniper chaining has been employed in past mitigation efforts associated with energy developments (Voigt and Nagy 1979), and will provide a potential means of mitigating big game losses resulting from mining impacts. Despite the relatively large-scale use of pinyon-juniper chaining in the past, nongame wildlife responses to this habitat manipulation are poorly understood. A number of authors have described avian and small-mammal communities in pinyon-juniper woodlands (e.g., Hardy 1945; Miller 1946; Shepherd, unpubl. rep., Colorado Div. Wildl. Fed. Aid Proj. W-101-R-14, 1972; Austin and Urness 1976). The effects of clearing pinyon-juniper on small mammals have been studied to some extent (Turkowski and Reynolds 1970, Baker and Frischknecht 1973, Turkowski and Watkins 1976), but studies of the responses of bird communities to such habitat alterations are lacking. The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe vegetation, breeding-bird populations, and small-mammal populations on selected chained and unchained areas of pinyon-juniper woodland, (2) evaluate the effects of chaining on these 1 Present address: School of Forest Resources and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611. 2 Present address: Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824. 3 Present address: Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Box 6249, Sheridan, WY 82801. J. Wildl. Manage. 45(2):1981 381 This content downloaded from 207.46.13.174 on Sun, 10 Jul 2016 04:51:45 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 382 NONGAME WILDLIFE IN PINYON-JUNIPER. O'Meara et al. populations, and (3) formulate recommendations for maximizing benefits to this fauna when clearing pinyon-juniper for range improvement and wildlife mitigation. We acknowledge the field assistance of J. Gebhard, H. D. Gibbs, R. Kahn, and J. G. Mitchell, Colorado State University. R. F. Labisky, W. R. Marion, and T. E. Rogers, University of Florida, reviewed the manuscript. Funds for the study were provided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, contracts 14-16-0008-2016 and 14-16-0008-