Pin Site Research Articles

Improving external fixator pin site care through user involvement: A quality improvement project

IntroductionExternal fixation is widely used in treating complex fractures and limb reconstruction. Pin site infections remain a significant complication, impacting on patients' physical and psychosocial wellbeing. This clinical improvement project at a University Hospital in Denmark aimed to enhance pin site care by involving patients and caregivers throughout the treatment pathway. BackgroundAt our hospital, approximately 55 trauma patients are annually treated with lower limb external fixators. Pin site care is crucial for preventing serious infections/osteomyelitis and involves collaboration between hospital and municipal caregivers. Traditional pin site care in our unit was complex and time-consuming, causing patient anxiety and frequent unplanned clinic visits. MethodsInspired by the Participatory Design research methodology, a quality improvement project was conducted in three phases: (1) identifying users’ needs, (2) developing solutions collaboratively, and (3) testing/evaluating these solutions. Iterative cycles of planning, acting, observing, and reflecting were employed, facilitating mutual learning among participants. Interviews with patients, families and healthcare professionals and field observations both at the hospital and in the municipality were conducted. Inspiration was sought from international literature. ResultsPhase 1 identified the need for improved education about infection recognition, a less painful and time-consuming dressing method, and an assessment tool for pin site infection. Phase 2 involved extensive user input to develop and implement a new dressing procedure using PolyMem™ along with an assessment tool. Phase 3 evaluated the new methods, revealing reduced patient pain, fewer clinic visits, and stable infection rates as well as less time-consuming pin site care. ConclusionThe project successfully enhanced pin site care, involving users in developing a new care process, thus improving patient satisfaction and care efficiency. Implications for future practiceIncorporating patient perspectives and collaborative methods can significantly improve clinical care pathways. Future efforts should focus on further integrating patient centered and participatory approaches in healthcare improvements.

Can pin-site inflammation be detected with thermographic imaging? A cross-sectional study from the USA and Denmark of patients treated with external fixators.

Patients with external fixators are at risk of pin-site infection. A tool for objective monitoring of pin sites for evolving signs of infection is warranted. We aimed to investigate the temperature (MaxTp) difference between clean and visually inflamed pin sites using thermography and to establish the optimal cut-off value of MaxTp using thermography as a screening tool for inflammation detection. This was a cross-sectional study performed in the USA and Denmark of patients with circular external fixators. Pin sites were visually judged by a surgeon or a nurse as clean or as showing signs of inflammation. The MaxTp was obtained at the pin site by thermographic imaging using an infrared camera (FLIR T540). We included 1,970 pin sites from 83 patients. The mean MaxTp for clean pin sites (n = 1,739) was 33.1°C (95% confidence interval [CI] 32.8-33.4) and the mean MaxTp for visual inflamed pin sites (n = 231) was 34.0°C (CI 33.6-34.3). The mean difference, when adjusted for repeated observations of patients and pin sites, was statistically significant with a difference of 0.9°C (CI 0.7-1.1) (P < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for MaxTp as a screening tool to detect visual signs of inflammation was 0.71 (CI 0.65-0.76). The empirically optimal cut-off value was 34.1°C with a sensitivity of 65%, a specificity of 72%, a positive predictive value of 23%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. We found a statistically significant difference in mean temperature between pin sites with and without visual signs of inflammation. Thermography could be a promising tool for future point of care technology for monitoring inflammation around pin sites.

Long-term results of treatment of Gustilo-Anderson type 3A-B tibia fractures due to combat-related high-energy ballistic injuries treated with external circular fixator: Experience of the Military Medical Academy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the longterm outcomes of open tibia fractures treated using the Ilizarov external circular fixation (ECF) technique in the Military Medical Academy. Between January 1992 and December 2011, a total of 134 male military personnel (median age: 22.5 years; range, 18 to 36 years) with Gustilo-Anderson type 3 open tibia fractures treated with ECF were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent multiple surgeries and eventually Ilizarov fixation surgery. The radiological and functional outcomes were evaluated using the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) criteria, and complications were noted. The median follow-up was 17.7 (range, 10 to 29) years. The median time to union was 4.7 (range, 3 to 8) months. All frames were removed from the limb, when union was observed. No re-fracture, limb length discrepancy more than 2.5 cm, or below-knee amputation after Ilizarov treatment was seen in any patient. Chronic osteomyelitis was observed at in 40% (n=54) of the patients at a median time ranging from 17 to 148 months. The overall ASAMI bone scores were excellent in 40 (30%), good in 20 (15%), fair in 20 (15%), and poor in 54 (40%) patients with osteomyelitis. The ASAMI functional scores were excellent in 40 (30%), good in 40 (30%), and fair in 54 patients (40%). No poor score was observed. Minor pin site infections were observed in 63 patients (47%). Our long-term study results showed that all patients returned to their social life and were mobilized without support after treatment with the use of Ilizarov ECF method of open tibia fractures caused by high-energy ballistic injuries. However, complications such as pin tract infections and osteomyelitis after several years must be kept in mind in the treatment of comminuted bone fractures caused by firearms and ballistic missiles injuries.

Consent in Limb Lengthening Surgery: Predicting the True Incidence of Material Risk.

The consent process involves supported decision-making between the surgeon and the patient. Both potential benefits and material risks of the procedure require explanation, with adequate time for reflection. The complexity of limb reconstruction surgery includes the potential for multiple types of complications. In an attempt to delineate the material risks in lower limb lengthening, a literature review was undertaken to ascertain the published rates of complications. A review of articles from 2003 to 2023 via PubMed and Google Scholar, including keywords 'lengthening', 'tibia', 'lengthening nail' and 'external fixator' was undertaken. Studies with a minimum of 20 patients, undergoing lengthening of the femur, tibia, or both by an external fixator and/or an intramedullary lengthening nail were included for analysis. Complications were reported according to Paley's problems, obstacles, and complications. Twenty-two papers met the inclusion criteria. The commonest complications listed following lengthening using an external fixator were pin site infections (52% in the femur and 18.8% in the tibia), delayed consolidation (8.3%), bone re-fracture (13%), and joint stiffness (18.8%). Following femoral lengthening using the intramedullary lengthening nails reported complication rates were lower, including implant issues (8%) and delayed consolidation (6%). Patients require a full understanding of both benefits and potential harms when undergoing any surgical intervention. Our study has identified the published rates of complications following lower limb lengthening. These figures can be used to guide the consultation and enable surgeons to audit their own surgical results against the published literature. Makvana S, Robertson A, Britten S, et al. Consent in Limb Lengthening Surgery: Predicting the True Incidence of Material Risk. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(2):61-66.

Primary Closure of External Fixator Pin Sites Is Safe After Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery.

To determine if rates of pin site infection and surgical site infection among patients managed with primary closure after external fixator removal were similar to those allowed to heal secondarily. Retrospective cohort. Urban/Suburban Academic Level I Trauma Center. Patients who had received a lower extremity external fixator for provisional management before definitive fixation of lower extremity fractures were included with pin site wounds closed primarily or allowed to heal by secondary intention. The rate of pin tract infection and surgical site infection following primary closure of external fixator pin sites relative to patients whose pin sites were allowed to heal through secondary intention. In total, 256 patients were evaluated: 143 patients (406 pin sites) in the primary closure group and 113 patients (340 in sites) in the secondary closure group. The average age was 49 ± 16 years. Sixty-five percent of included patients were male. There was no difference in pin tract infections between cohorts (primary = 0.5%, secondary = 1.5%, P = 0.26). External fixator duration in the primary closure group was 11.5 ± 8.4 days and 13.0 ± 8.1 days in the secondary closure group (P = 0.15). There was a greater rate of surgical site infections in the secondary intention cohort (15.9% vs. 7.7%, P = 0.047). There was no difference in pin site infection rate after primary pin site closure relative to patients who were allowed to heal through secondary intention. Furthermore, there was a lower rate of surgical site infection after primary closure. These results challenge the dogma of secondary closure for ex fix pin sites, suggesting that debridement and primary closure is a safe option for management of external fixator pin sites and may impart benefit in decreasing infection risk. Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mid to Long-Term Outcomes of Grade III-B Open Tibial Fractures Definitively Managed With a Circular Frame: A 13-Year Prospective Database Study at a Major Trauma Center.

The aim of this study was to report experience of a major trauma center utilizing circular frames as definitive fixation in patients sustaining Gustilo-Anderson 3B open tibial fractures. A prospectively maintained database was retrospectively interrogated. Single major trauma center in the United Kingdom. All patients over the age of 16 sustaining an open tibial fracture with initial debridement performed at the study center. All patients also received orthoplastic care for a soft tissue defect (via skeletal deformation or a soft tissue cover procedure) and subsequent definitive management using an Ilizarov ring fixator. Patients who received primary debridement at another center, had preexisting infection, sustained a periarticular fracture, or those who did not afford a minimum of 12-month follow-up were excluded. Case notes and radiographs were reviewed to collate patient demographics and injury factors. The primary outcome of interest was deep infection rate with secondary outcomes including time to union and secondary interventions. Two hundred twenty-five patients met inclusion criteria. Mean age was 43.2 year old, with 72% males, 34% smokers, and 3% diabetics. Total duration of frame management averaged 6.4 months (SD 7.7). Eight (3.5%) patients developed a deep infection and 41 (20%) exhibited signs of a pin site infection. Seventy-nine (35.1%) patients had a secondary intervention, of which 8 comprised debridement of deep infection, 29 bony procedures, 8 soft tissue operations, 30 frame adjustments, and 4 patients requiring a combination of soft tissue and bony procedures. Bony union was achieved in 221 cases (98.2%), 195 (86.7%) achieved union in a single frame without the need for secondary intervention, 26 required frame adjustments to achieve union. Autologous bone grafts were used in 10 cases. Orthoplastic care including circular frame fixation for Gustilo-Anderson-3B fractures of the tibia resulted in a low rate of deep infection (3.5%) and achieved excellent union rates (98.2%). Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Orthopedic Nursing Care Protocol on Pain, Anxiety, and Occurrence of Pin Sites Infection among Patients with External Fixators

Effect of Orthopedic Nursing Care Protocol on Pain, Anxiety, and Occurrence of Pin Sites Infection among Patients with External Fixators

Complications and Learning Curve Associated with an Imageless Burr-Based (CORI) Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty System: Results from First 500 Cases.

The use of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA) is gaining traction. There is evidence to suggest that RA-TKA can help to optimize the precision and accuracy of implant positioning and that there may be protective effects on surrounding bony and soft tissues. Yet, there are important differences between the various RA-TKA systems currently on the market. One such newly introduced RA-TKA system uses imageless technology and performs bony cuts with the use of a burr-based device. The learning curve and complications unique to this system have yet to be assessed. We evaluated 500 consecutive RA-TKA cases using a newly developed burr-based and imageless system which were done by a single surgeon between the months of October 2021 and February 2023. Operative times were recorded and compared to the previous 150 conventional TKA cases allowing for the learning curve to be calculated using the CUSUM method. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were categorically profiled. The learning curve of this RA-TKA system was found to be 6 cases. Intraoperative complications included unintended bony over resection (n = 3), soft tissue injury (n = 2), and robotic system hardware (n = 2) or software (n = 2) malfunction. Postoperative complications consisted of superficial pin site infection (n = 1) and periprosthetic fracture near the pin sites (n = 1). There were no identified cases of prosthetic joint infection, instability events, or wound complications. The learning curve and the complication profile of a newly introduced imageless and burr-based RA-TKA system were described. This information serves to guide surgeons in adopting this technology and can counsel them regarding the potential pitfalls and challenges associated with its integration into practice. The work sheds light on the complexity and learning curve of the recently released imageless burr-based RA-TKA system. This important information is intended to help surgeons accept this cutting-edge technology by providing advice on any errors and difficulties that can occur when integrating it into clinical practice. This information can help surgeons navigate the complexities of integrating this new burr-based robotic technology into knee replacement procedures, enabling them to make well-informed decisions and receive guidance.

Osteotomy Site Venting Enhances Femoral Bone Consolidation With Magnetic Intramedullary Lengthening Nails.

Magnetic intramedullary lengthening nailing has demonstrated benefits over external fixation devices for femoral bone lengthening. These include avoiding uncomfortable external fixation and associated pin site infections, scarring, and inhibition of muscle or joint function. Despite this, little has changed in the field of biologically enhanced bone regeneration. Venting the femoral intramedullary canal at the osteotomy site before reaming creates egress for bone marrow during reaming. The reamings that are extruded from vent holes may function as a prepositioned bone graft at the distraction gap. The relationship between venting and the consolidation of regenerating bone remains unclear. (1) Do bone marrow reamings extruded through venting holes enhance the quality of bone regeneration and improve healing indices and consolidation times? (2) Is venting associated with a higher proportion of complications than nonventing? We performed a retrospective study of femoral lengthening performed at one hospital from December 2012 to February 2022 using a magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail with or without venting at the osteotomy site before reaming. This was a generally sequential series, in which the study groups were assembled as follows: Venting was performed between July 2012 and August 2016 and again from November 2021 onward. Nonventing was used between October 2016 and October 2021 because the senior author opted to create drill holes after the reaming procedure to avoid commitment to the osteotomy level before completing the reaming procedure. Outcomes were evaluated based on bone healing time, time to achieve full weightbearing, and complications. Sixty-one femoral lengthening procedures were studied (in 33 male and 28 female patients); two patients were excluded because of implant breakage. The mean age was 17 ± 5 years. The mean amount of lengthening was 55 ± 13 mm in the venting group and 48 ± 16 mm in the nonventing group (mean difference 7 ± 21 [95% CI 2 to 12]; p = 0.07). The healing index was defined as the time (in days) required for three cortices to bridge with new bone formation divided by the length (in cm) lengthened during the clinical protocol. This index signifies the bone formation rate achieved under the specific conditions of the protocol. Full weightbearing was allowed upon bridging the regenerated gap on three sides. Consolidation time was defined as the total number of days from the completion of the lengthening phase until adequate bone union (all three cortices healed) was achieved and full weightbearing was permitted. This time frame represents the entire healing process after the lengthening is complete divided by the amount of lengthening achieved (in cm). Patient follow-up was conducted meticulously at our institution, and we adhered to a precise schedule, occurring every 2 weeks during the distraction phase and every 4 weeks during the consolidation phase. There were no instances of loss to follow-up. Every patient completed the treatment successfully, reaching the specified milestones of weightbearing and achieving three cortexes of bone bridging. The mean healing index time in the venting group was faster than that in the nonventing group (21 ± 6 days/cm versus 31 ± 22 days/cm, mean difference 10 ± 23 [95% CI 4 to 16]; p = 0.02). The mean consolidation time was faster in the venting group than the nonventing group (10 ± 6 days/cm versus 20 ± 22 days/cm; mean difference 10 ± 23 [95% CI 4 to 15]; p = 0.02). No medical complications such as deep vein thrombosis or fat or pulmonary embolism were seen. Two patients had lengthy delays in regenerate union, both of whom were in the nonventing group (healing indexes were 74 and 62 days/cm; consolidation time was 52 and 40 days/cm). Femoral lengthening with a magnetic intramedullary lengthening nail healed more quickly with prereaming venting than with nonventing, and it allowed earlier full weightbearing without any major associated complications. Future studies should evaluate whether there is a correlation between the number of venting holes and improvement in the healing index and consolidation time. Level III, therapeutic study.

Incidence of complications among operative pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures using medial and lateral pins: a safe technique for percutaneous medial pin placement.

Cross-pinning of displaced pediatric supracondylar elbow fractures offers a superior stability construct. However, there is a reluctance to use this construct by closed means because of the risk of iatrogenic ulnar nerve injuries associated with percutaneous medial pin placement. This study describes a safe technique for closed reduction percutaneous with medial pin placement. This study reviewed the clinical charts of 232 pediatric patients who underwent closed reduction with cross-pinning of Gartland type II and III supracondylar fractures from 2000 to 2022 at a single institution. All surgeries were performed by the same attending surgeon at the same institution, with the same technique of medial pin placement. The inpatient and outpatient notes were used to record patient demographic information, fracture classification, and postoperative complications. A total of 232 pediatric patients [114 boys, 118 girls; mean age: 5.8 (range: 1-14) years] with Gartland type II (n = 97) and III (n = 135) supracondylar fractures were included in the study. There were a total of seven (3.02%) postoperative complications: four (1.7%) ulnar neuropathies, two (0.86%) pin site infections, and one (0.43%) anterior interosseous nerve palsy. All documented postoperative complications were resolved by the 3-month follow-up visit. There were no complications of deep infection, malunion, or nonunion. With the proper technique, closed reduction with percutaneous medial pin fixation of pediatric supracondylar fractures is safe and produces excellent postoperative outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.

Trifocal versus Pentafocal bone transport in segmental tibial defects: a matched comparative analysis for posttraumatic osteomyelitis treatment

PurposeThe objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness and clinical results of trifocal bone transport (TBT) and pentafocal bone transport (PBT) in treating distal tibial defects > 6 cm resulting from posttraumatic osteomyelitis, highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of each method.MethodsA retrospective assessment was conducted on an overall population of 46 eligible patients with distal tibial defects > 6 cm who received treatment between January 2015 and January 2019. Propensity score analysis was used to pair 10 patients who received TBT with 10 patients who received PBT. The outcomes assessed included demographic information, external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), bone and functional outcomes assessed using the Association for the Study and Application of the Method of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system, and postoperative complications evaluated using the Paley classification.ResultsThe demographic and baseline data of the two groups were comparable. Following radical debridement, the average tibial defect was 7.02 ± 0.68 cm. The mean EFT was significantly shorter in the PBT group (130.9 ± 16.0 days) compared to the TBT group (297.3 ± 14.3 days). Similarly, the EFI was lower in the PBT group (20.67 ± 2.75 days/cm) than in the TBT group (35.86 ± 3.69 days/cm). Both groups exhibited satisfactory postoperative bone and functional results. Pin site infection was the most common complication and the rates were significantly different between the groups, with the PBT group demonstrating a higher incidence.ConclusionBoth TBT and PBT effectively treat posttraumatic tibial defects greater than 6 cm, with PBT offering more efficient bone regeneration. However, PBT is associated with a higher rate of pin site infections, highlighting the importance of careful management in these complex procedures and emphasizing the need for expert surgical execution and tailored treatment approaches in orthopedic reconstructive surgery.

Buried or exposed Kirschner wire for the management of hand and forearm fractures: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

The recommendation on whether to bury or expose the Kirschner wire (K-wire) for the management of fractures has still been controversial with inconsistent results in the published studies due to the potential issue associated with exposed K-wire is the heightened risk of infection, as it comes into direct contact with the external environment and air. This study aims to summarize the specific outcomes between buried and exposed K-wire for the management of hand and forearm fractures. We conducted relevant literature searches on Europe PMC, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases using specific keywords. This investigation focuses on individuals of any age diagnosed with hand or forearm fractures who underwent surgery involving Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. It examines the comparison between buried and exposed K-wire fixation, emphasizing primary outcome pin infection, along with secondary outcomes such as early pin removal, days to pin removal, and surgical duration. The study includes observational studies (cohort/case-control) or randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The results of continuous variables were pooled into the standardized mean difference (SMD), while dichotomous variables were pooled into odds ratio (OR) along with 95% confidence intervals using random-effect models. The quality of included studies was assessed with Cochrane Collaborations, Risk of Bias version 2 (RoB v2). A total of 11 studies were included. Our pooled analysis revealed that buried K-wire was associated with a lower risk of pin site infection [RR 0.49 (95% CI 0.36-0.67), p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%] and 33.85 days longer duration until pin removal [MD 33.85 days (95% CI 18.68-49.02), p < 0.0001, I2 = 99%] when compared with exposed K-wire. However, the duration of surgery was 9.98 minutes significantly longer in the buried K-wire [MD 6.98 minutes (95% CI 2.19-11.76), p = 0.004, I2 = 42%] with no significant difference in the early pin removal rate [RR 0.73 (95% CI 0.36-1.45), p = 0.37, I2 = 0%]. Further regression analysis revealed that sample size, age, sex, and duration of follow-up did not affect those relationships. Buried K-wire may offer benefits in reducing the infection rate with a longer duration until pin removal. However, further RCTs with larger sample sizes are still needed to confirm the results of our study.

Assessment of verbal (conventional) training versus models training for head frame fixation in neurosurgery

Cranial immobilization is an essential first step in cranial surgeries. Complications related to head fixation frames are under-reported and given less importance during training. Authors report their experience of using verbal (Conventional) training and training by models of “head fixation frame” and “wooden head” for head frame application for cranial surgeries. Models of the “Head Fixation Frame” (Mayfield clamp) and “wooden human head” were made using metal (iron) and wood, respectively. Major craniometric landmarks and dural venous sinuses were marked on the head model. A total of 15 trainee residents of &gt;18 months (Group A, n = 4), &lt; 18 months (Group B, n = 5), and without neurosurgical training (Group C, n = 6) were assessed for head frame application on human cadaver heads after verbal (conventional) training (n = 8) and training on models (n = 7). Various parameters, such as time taken for pin application, selection of pin site, and quadrants, were evaluated for adequacy of pin placements and position of head. Both methods were compared for assessment of better training method. Model training for head frame fixation was found better with regard to all aspects out of which time for positioning the head and for pin application, selection of quadrants of the head, site for pin insertions, and need of intervention by faculty were significant. Training on models of “head fixation frame” and “head” is better than conventional training. It is simple and safe and will prevent pin-related complications.

Clinical Outcome following Management of Severe Osteomyelitis due to Pin Site Infection.

This study has investigated cases of pin site infection (PSI) which required surgery for persistent osteomyelitis (OM) despite pin removal. Patients requiring surgery for OM after PSI between 2011 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Single-stage surgery was performed in accordance with a protocol at one institution. This involved deep sampling, debridement, implantation of local antibiotics, culture-specific systemic antibiotics and soft tissue closure. A successful outcome was defined as an infection-free interval of at least 24 months following surgery. Twenty-seven patients were identified (the sites were 22 tibias, 2 humeri, 2 calcanei, 1 radius); about 85% of them were males with a median age of 53.9 years. The majority of infections (21/27) followed fracture treatment. Fifteen patients were classified as BACH uncomplicated and 12 were BACH complex. Staphylococci were the most common pathogens, polymicrobial infections were detected in five cases (19%). Seven patients required flap coverage which was performed in the same operation.After a median of 3.99 years (2.00-8.05) follow-up, all patients remained infection free at the site of the former OM. Wound leakage after local antibiotic treatment was seen in 3/27 (11.1%) cases but did not require further treatment. Osteomyelitis after PSI is uncommon but has major implications for the patient as 7 patients needed flap coverage. This reinforces the need for careful pin placement and pin site care to prevent deep infection. These infections were treated in accordance with a protocol and were not managed simply by curettage. All patients treated in this manner remained infection-free after a minimum follow-up of 2 years suggesting that this protocol is effective. Pin site infection is a very common complication in external fixation. The sequela of a chronic pin site OM is rare but the implications to the patient are huge. In this series, more than a quarter of patients required flap coverage as part of the treatment of the deep infection. Frank FA, Pomeroy E, Hotchen AJ, et al. Clinical Outcome following Management of Severe Osteomyelitis due to Pin Site Infection. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2024;19(1):21-25.

Comparison of the Efficacy of Sterile Silicone Studs Versus Lidocaine for the Attenuation of the Hemodynamic Response to Skull Pin Insertion: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BackgroundSkull pin insertion causes hypertension and tachycardia that adversely affects cerebral hemodynamics. We compared the efficacy of sterile silicone studs (SS) and pin site infiltration with lidocaine in attenuation of the sympathetic response to skull pin insertion. MethodsOne hundred and twenty adult patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy under general anesthesia were randomized to receive either medical-grade sterile SS (Group SS) or 2 ml of 2% plain lidocaine infiltration at each pin site (Group LO). The primary objective was the comparison of the hemodynamic (heart rate [HR] and mean arterial pressure [MAP]) response to skull pin insertion at baseline and 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 minutes of skull pin insertion. The secondary objectives were to assess the requirement of rescue analgesia (fentanyl), complications like pin-site bleeding, and the surgeon satisfaction score. ResultsThe HR in Group LO was significantly greater at 0, 1, 2, 3 and 5 mins post pin insertion as compared to Group SS (P <0.05). The MAP was also significantly higher in Group LO at 0, 1, 2, and 3 mins post pin insertion (P = 0.001, 0.01, 0.034 and 0.042 respectively) as compared to Group SS. The number of patients requiring fentanyl [17/60 (28.3%) v/s 40/60 (66%), P=0.001] was lower in Group SS. The incidence of pin site bleeding was also lower in Group SS along with a greater surgeon satisfaction score. ConclusionSterile SS appears to be more effective than lidocaine infiltration in attenuating the hemodynamic response to skull pin insertion with minimal adverse effects. Further multi-centre studies are necessary to conclusively establish the safety and efficacy of sterile SS.

Preventogen: Shifting The Clinical Paradigm of Pin Site Care and Transosseous Wire Infections Associated with External Fixation in Limb Trauma &amp; Reconstruction

Preventogen: Shifting The Clinical Paradigm of Pin Site Care and Transosseous Wire Infections Associated with External Fixation in Limb Trauma &amp; Reconstruction

SELECTIVE REMOVAL OF ILIZAROV FRAMES WITHOUT A PERIOD OF DYNAMIZATION APPEARS SAFE

IntroductionTraditionally, radiological union of fractures treated with an Ilizarov frame is confirmed by a period of dynamization - destabilisation of the frame for a period prior to removal. Reduced clinic availability during the COVID-19 pandemic caused a shift to selective dynamisation in our department, whereby lower risk patients had their frames removed on the same day as destabilisation. This study investigates the effects of this change in practice on outcomes and complication rates.Materials &amp; MethodsAdult patients treated with circular frames between April 2020 and February 2022 were identified from our Ilizarov database. Patients were divided into 2 groups: - “dynamised” if their frame was destabilised for a period to confirm union prior to removal; or “not dynamised” if the decision was taken to remove the frame without a period of dynamisation, other than a short period in the clinic. A retrospective review of clinical notes was conducted to determine outcome.Results175 patients were included in the final analysis, 70 in the dynamised and 103 in the not dynamised groups, median follow-up was 33 months. 3 patients in the dynamised group failed dynamisation and had their period of fixation extended, subsequently having their frames removed without complication. Two patients suffered a refracture or non-union after frame removal in the dynamised group and none in the not dynamised group, this difference was not statistically significant.ConclusionsIn our practice, selective frame removal without a period of dynamisation appears safe. This has the potential to shorten frame time and reduce the number of clinic appointments and radiographic investigations for these patients. Some patients find the period of dynamisation uncomfortable and associated with pin site infection, which can be avoided. We plan to continue this practice and collect further data to confirm these findings in a larger dataset.

CIRCULAR FRAME IN THE PRESENCE OF PRE-EXISTING ARTHROPLASTY: IS THERE AN UNACCEPTABLE RISK OF INFECTION?

IntroductionCircular external frames (CEF) are commonly used for a wide variety of indications, often when other devices are not appropriate. Circular frames are particularly associated with pin-site infection (PSI). Currently there is a gap in the available literature surrounding the risk of frame use with in-situ prosthetic joints. This retrospective study investigated the incidence of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in a series of patients with in-situ arthroplasties treated with CEF.Materials &amp; MethodsFrom a departmental database of 1052 frames performed from March 2007-March 2023, the outcomes of 34 patients (40 frames) with in-situ arthroplasties at the time of CEF were reviewed (mean follow-up 70 months). Patient identification was by review of all local and regional imaging. The primary outcome was development of PJI during or following CEF and subsequent need for surgical intervention. Secondary outcomes were development of superficial pin site or deep bone infection (without PJI).ResultsOf 40 frames used to treat 34 patients, no PJIs were detected. Average patient age was 67 (range 55–82). 22 had cardio-respiratory disease, 11 diabetes, 15 smoked and 8 were immunosuppressed. 53 arthroplasties were in situ at the time of treatment, 12 involving the same bone as the frame. Average time in frame was 253 days. 23 patients developed PSI, 2 required a further procedure for persistent deep bone infection not involving the arthroplasties.ConclusionsAlthough this study involves a relatively low numbers of patients, our results are reassuring that circular frame management in patients with in-situ arthroplasty does not represent an unacceptable risk of PJI. We hope to promote these findings and encourage multi-centre collaboration to expand on the available evidence to better answer this important yet under-reported clinical question.

THE RESULTS OF TWO-RING HEXAPODS IN THE LOWER LIMB AT KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL

IntroductionClassical fixation using a circular frame involves two rings per segment and in many units this remains the norm whether using ilizarov or hexapod type frames. We present the results of two ring circular frame at King's College Hospital.Materials &amp; MethodsA prospective database has been maintained of all frames applied since 2007. Radiographs from frames applied prior to July 2022 were examined. Clinic letters were then used to identify complications.Included: two ring hexapod for fracture, malunion, nonunion, arthrodesis or deformity correction in the lower limb.Excluded: patients under 16 years old, diabetic feet, Charcot joints, soft tissue contractures, arthrodiastasis, correction of the mid/forefoot, plate fixation augmentation, fixation off a third ring.Results518 two ring hexapods were identified. Mean age was 46 (16–89). 55% were for fracture, 18% for malunion, 11% for nonunion. Mean frame time was 7 months (2–29 months).All clinic letters from 384 patients showed 203 patients (52%) had at least one pin site infection, 27 nonunions (7%), 16 frame revisions (4%), 25 bone grafting procedures (7%), 5 cases of septic arthritis (1%), 3 periprosthetic fractures (0.8%),), 12 malunions (3%), 4 Amputations (1%).ConclusionsThese results demonstrate the efficacy of a two ring hexapod for patients requiring reconstruction of the lower limb.

External Fixation Before Planned Conversion to Internal Fixation in Orthopaedic Trauma: Controversies and Current Trends.

External fixation is a widely used technique for a myriad of bone fractures and pathologies in all extremities. Despite its widespread use, controversies and unknowns still exist. This review article seeks to discuss current literature surrounding pin insertion technique, pin-site care, intraoperative use during conversion to definitive fixation, the relationship of pin sites to definitive fixation, and pin-site management after removal for temporary external fixation.