Abstract Higher survival rates for children diagnosed with low-grade gliomas (LGG), compared to other brain cancers, often limit the survivorship resources afforded this cohort, despite potential long-term physical, functional and psychological impacts. We conducted a two-phase program of research, first evaluating LGG survivors’ need for support during the survivorship phase, followed by the development and pilot evaluation of a multidisciplinary, telehealth, survivorship program. Phase 1: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children aged 0-16 years at diagnosis, diagnosed between 2000-2015, assessing psychosocial impact and quality of life. Phase 2: We developed ‘Engage Brain’, a multidisciplinary, telehealth program, designed to improve medical and psychosocial outcomes for childhood cancer survivors throughout their lifespan. Key components of Engage’s design include distance-delivered care to ensure access for all survivors irrespective of whether they live close to a tertiary, survivorship center; hospital-based expertise integrated with local, primary care services to ensure a model of care which is sustainable long-term; nurse-led care providing tailored education to encourage adoption of a prevention-focused healthy lifestyle to mitigate survivors’ personal risk and reduce ongoing costs to the individual and healthcare system; psychosocial focus, incorporating allied health staff (psychologist/social worker) as an integral aspect of care. Phase 1: 45 survivors participated (36% female, mean age 14.8 years, average 7.5 years post-treatment). Survivors reported high levels of anxiety (23%), depression (14%), fatigue (62%). Phase 2: 30 LGG survivors completed Engage Brain intervention (50% female, mean age 21 years, average 11.5 years post-treatment). 64% uptake, 10% attrition. Most (78%) of participants ‘agree’-‘greatly agree’ that Engage Brain provides ‘high-quality survivorship care’ and ‘help accessing survivorship care’. This program of research illustrates the long-term needs of LGG survivors, despite their lower risk status compared to other brain cancers, and the feasibility of providing a multidisciplinary, telehealth intervention to support them.
Read full abstract