Physician Global Assessment Score Research Articles

Contributors to Organ Damage in Childhood Lupus: Corticosteroid Use and Disease Activity.

Awareness of paediatric-specific predictors of damage in Childhood-lupus is needed to inform mitigation measures. To ascertain how clinical and demographic variables correlate with damage accrual and identify predictors of damage. Analysis included UK JSLE Cohort Study participants. Univariable and multivariable Prentice-Williams-Peterson models investigated how demographic and clinical factors influenced hazards of new damage. Analyses were performed across the entire cohort, in patients with minimal disease activity marked by a time-adjusted average SLEDAI-2K score (AMS)≤2, low activity (AMS ≤ 4), moderate-high activity (AMS > 4) and those with no corticosteroids. Within the entire cohort (n = 430), factors associated with damage included: any methylprednisolone (Hazard Ratio, HR 2.20, [CI 1.33-3.62]), time-adjusted mean Physicians Global Assessment (PGA) (HR 2.87, [CI 1.48-5.56]) and AMS score (HR 1.13, [CI 1.03-1.24], all p< 0.05). Within the low activity subgroup, any methylprednisolone (HR 2.61, [CI 1.04-6.53]) and time-adjusted mean PGA (HR 3.41, [CI 1.52-7.76]) were associated with damage (both p< 0.05). Within the moderate-high activity subgroup, any methylprednisolone (HR 2.29, [CI 1.31-4.00]), time-adjusted mean PGA (HR 2.66, [CI 1.20-5.87]) and AMS score (HR 1.15, [CI 1.03-1.29]), were predictive of damage (all p< 0.05). Baseline organ damage was predictive of subsequent damage accrual in the minimal activity (HR 1.33, CI [1.78-8.08]) and no corticosteroids subgroups (HR 3.64, CI [1.83-7.24], both p< 0.005). Disease activity levels (AMS/PGA) and proxy indicators (methylprednisolone exposure, baseline damage) were found to be key predictors of damage accrual. This highlights the importance of practical strategies, to reduce disease activity and long-term treatment toxicity, such as treat-to-target.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, in patients from China mainland, Taiwan, and South Korea with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial.

Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in the United States, European Union, Japan, South Korea, China, and other countries for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of deucravacitinib in Asian patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. In the 52-week, blinded, phase 3 POETYK PSO-3 trial (NCT04167462), patients were randomized 1 : 2 to placebo (n = 74) or deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily (n = 146) for 16 weeks followed by deucravacitinib alone. Coprimary endpoints were achievement of ≥ 75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) and static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (sPGA 0/1) at Week 16. Efficacy and safety were evaluated throughout. At Week 16, significantly higher proportions of patients receiving deucravacitinib versus placebo achieved PASI 75 (68.8% vs. 8.1%; P < 0.0001) and sPGA 0/1 (55.6% vs. 6.8%; P < 0.0001). Response rates with deucravacitinib were maintained through Week 52. Common adverse events included upper respiratory tract infection and nasopharyngitis. Serious adverse event and discontinuation rates were low. Deucravacitinib was efficacious and well tolerated in Asian patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

A 3-Year Multicentric Study on Switching from Ustekinumab to Guselkumab in Partial Responders with Psoriasis-IL PSO (Italian Landscape Psoriasis).

Guselkumab, a human monoclonal antibody targeting the p19 subunit of interleukin-23 (IL-23), has shown efficacy in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. However, long-term real-world data on its effectiveness in patients with inadequate response to ustekinumab are limited. This study investigates guselkumab's long-term effectiveness and safety in patients with psoriasis with partial response to ustekinumab. We performed a retrospective multicentric study analyzing data of patients with psoriasis from seven Italian hospitals between January 2021 and May 2024. The study included 169 patients who switched from ustekinumab to guselkumab. Primary endpoints were Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 75, PASI 90, PASI 100, and absolute PASI ≤ 2. Site-specific Physician Global Assessment (PGA) scores were also collected for difficult-to-treat areas. The study included 169 patients. After 3years of treatment, PASI 75, PASI 90 and PASI 100 were achieved by 88.4%, 55.8%, and 32.6% of patients, respectively. Site-specific PGA showed significant improvements, especially in the scalp and genital areas. After 3years of treatment, no significant impact of higher body mass index (BMI) or cardiometabolic comorbidities on guselkumab effectiveness was detected. No severe adverse events were reported during the study period. In our study, guselkumab provided significant long-term effectiveness and safety in patients partially responsive to ustekinumab, improving both PASI score and site-specific PGA and confirming its potential use for patients with psoriasis switching from ustekinumab.

Effect of joint hypermobility on outcomes of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is common in pediatric rheumatology. Despite treatment, many patients experience persistent disease activity. Joint hypermobility (JH), defined by an excessive range of motion across multiple joints, is prevalent in children and adolescents and may influence disease outcomes in JIA. This study examines the impact of JH on symptoms in youth and young adults with JIA. Data were obtained from the PR-COIN network and included patients under 21years old with a diagnosis of JIA. Patients with JIA and JH were matched with those having JIA-only based on age, sex assigned at birth, JIA subtype, and medication exposure. Clinical data, including disease activity measures, patient well-being, and pain ratings, were collected at baseline and follow-up visits. The sample included 420 patients with JIA + JH and 2100 with JIA only. The JIA + JH group exhibited higher disease activity at baseline, more active arthritis joints, elevated physician global assessment of disease activity scores, and worse patient-reported well-being. These differences persisted over time. The JIA + JH group had a 19-20% greater likelihood of maintaining high disease activity scores and worsening over subsequent visits, indicating a significant impact of JH on disease progression. JH in youth with JIA is associated with higher and persistent disease activity, suggesting that JH significantly contributes to the disease burden in patients with JIA and should be considered in treatment strategies. Future research should further explore the mechanisms by which JH influences disease activity and investigate comprehensive management approaches to improve outcomes for this population. Key Points • Children with JIA and joint hypermobility (JH) exhibit significantly higher disease activity at baseline compared to those with JIA only, including more active arthritis joints and elevated physician global assessment scores. • The presence of JH in JIA patients is associated with poorer patient-reported well-being and higher overall disease activity scores, which persist over time despite treatment. • JIA + JH patients have a 19-20% greater likelihood of maintaining high disease activity and worsening over subsequent visits, indicating a significant impact of JH on disease progression. • The study suggests that JH should be considered an important clinical factor in the management of JIA, with targeted interventions needed to address the increased disease activity and improve overall patient outcomes.

Expert consensus on systemic therapy for plaque psoriasis with limited skin involvement in JAPAN: Results from a DELPHI study.

Our objective was to establish consensus on (1) which patients with plaque psoriasis and limited skin involvement (body surface area [BSA] <10%) are suitable for systemic treatment, and (2) a definition of 'topical therapy failure'. A steering committee refined 13 statements drawn from literature related to the study objectives. An independent panel of 45 clinical experts from Japan indicated their agreement to each statement using a 10-point Likert scale (Round 1; strong consensus, ≥70% of responses = 7-10 and median value ≥8). The steering committee reviewed Round 1 results and refined the statements for Round 2, as necessary. In Round 2, the panel indicated their agreement to each statement using a 3-point scale (strong consensus, ≥70% of responses and median value of 3) and were shown Round 1 responses before voting. Forty-five clinicians participated in Round 1 and 41 of those (91%) participated in Round 2. Consensus was achieved on the criteria of eligibility for systemic treatment among patients with limited skin involvement as disease involvement at special or difficult to treat areas, psoriasis-induced psychological distress, uncontrolled symptoms (e.g., scaling, bleeding, pruritus, insomnia) affecting their social life, psoriatic arthritis, or failure of topical therapy. Consensus on criteria for topical failure were persistent symptoms (e.g., itchiness, pain) and plaques, poor patient satisfaction with treatment, a need to increase medication quantity or application time after treatment with two topicals for 4 weeks; or if the Psoriasis Area Severity Index score of >3 or Physician Global Assessment Score of ≥2 after 8 weeks treatment. Our Delphi panel proposes criteria to help physicians identify patients with psoriasis and limited skin involvement who would benefit from systemic therapy and suggests a definition for topical therapy 'failure' which could indicate a move to systemic treatment is warranted.

Efficacy and safety of vunakizumab in moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Vunakizumab, a novel anti-interleukin-17A antibody, has shown promising efficacy for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a phase 2 trial. We conducted a double-blind, randomized phase 3 trial (NCT04839016) to further evaluate vunakizumab in this population. Six hundred ninety subjects were randomized (2:1) to receive vunakizumab 240mg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 4, and 8. At week 12, subjects on placebo were switched to vunakizumab 240mg (weeks 12, 14, 16, and every 4 weeks thereafter). The co-primary endpoints were ≥90% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score (PASI 90) and a static Physicians Global Assessment score of 0/1 (sPGA 0/1) at week 12. At week 12, the vunakizumab group showed higher PASI 90 (76.8% vs 0.9%) and sPGA 0/1 (71.8% vs 0.4%) response rates, as well as higher PASI 75 (93.6% vs 4.0%), PASI 100 (36.6% vs 0.0%), and sPGA 0 (38.2% vs 0.0%) response rates (all two-sided P<.0001 vs placebo). Efficacy was maintained through week 52 with continuous vunakizumab. Possible treatment-related serious adverse events occurred in 0.9% of vunakizumab-treated subjects. Chinese subjects only; no active comparator. Vunakizumab demonstrated robust clinical response at week 12 and through week 52, with good tolerability in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Improving lupus care index documentation in patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus.

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE) presents unique challenges due to increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality compared to adult-onset SLE. Effective disease management relies on accurate disease assessment and documentation. Our project aimed to improve the documentation of the Lupus Care Index (LCI), a disease assessment bundle, by implementing a quality improvement (QI) initiative. A QI project was conducted at Nationwide Children's Hospital (NCH), targeting patients with c-SLE. The LCI, comprising the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI-2k) Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and patient-reported pain score, was introduced to capture comprehensive disease assessment. Interventions included provider education, standardization of documentation procedures, and electronic health record (EHR) modifications. Automated reports tracked documentation rates, and Pareto charts identified areas for targeted interventions. Baseline analysis revealed incomplete documentation of LCI components in only one-third of c-SLE patients. Following interventions, documentation rates improved from 38% to 90%, with sustained improvement over at least a year. Enhancing documentation of LCI in patients with c-SLE is crucial for optimizing disease management. Our quality improvement initiative demonstrated the feasibility of improving documentation practices through targeted interventions and system modifications. Future research should explore the impact of comprehensive documentation on clinical outcomes in pediatric lupus patients. Improving documentation of LCI in patients with c-SLE is essential for optimizing care delivery and clinical outcomes; our QI initiative highlights the effectiveness of systemic interventions in enhancing documentation practices and underscores the importance of continued efforts to improve pediatric lupus care.

Tyrosine Kinase 2 Inhibition With Zasocitinib (TAK-279) in Psoriasis

New, effective, and well-tolerated oral therapies are needed for treating psoriasis. Zasocitinib, a highly selective allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitor, is a potential new oral treatment for this disease. To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of zasocitinib in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multiple-dose randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 11, 2021, to September 12, 2022, at 47 centers in the US and 8 in Canada. The study included a 12-week treatment period and a 4-week follow-up period. Key eligibility criteria for participants included age 18 to 70 years; a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score of 12 or greater; a Physician's Global Assessment score of 3 or greater; and a body surface area covered by plaque psoriasis of 10% or greater. Of 287 patients randomized, 259 (90.2%) received at least 1 dose of study treatment. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1:1) to receive zasocitinib at 2, 5, 15, or 30 mg or placebo orally, once daily, for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of patients achieving 75% or greater improvement in PASI score (PASI 75) at week 12. Secondary efficacy end points included PASI 90 and 100 responses. Safety was also assessed. In total, 259 patients were randomized and received treatment (mean [SD] age, 47 [13] years; 82 women [32%]). At week 12, PASI 75 was achieved for 9 (18%), 23 (44%), 36 (68%), and 35 (67%) patients receiving zasocitinib at 2, 5, 15, and 30 mg, respectively, and 3 patients (6%) receiving placebo. PASI 90 responses were consistent with PASI 75. PASI 100 demonstrated a dose response at all doses, with 17 patients (33%) achieving PASI 100 with zasocitinib, 30 mg. Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred for 23 patients (44%) receiving placebo and 28 (53%) to 31 (62%) patients receiving the 4 different doses of zasocitinib, with no dose dependency and no clinically meaningful longitudinal differences in laboratory parameters. This randomized clinical trial found that potent and selective inhibition of TYK2 with zasocitinib at oral doses of 5 mg or more once daily resulted in greater skin clearance than placebo over 12 weeks. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04999839.

Tapinarof cream for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: Efficacy and safety results from 2 Japanese phase 3 trials.

Tapinarof is a non-steroidal, topical, aryl hydrocarbon receptor agonist. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of tapinarof cream (1%) in Japanese patients aged ≥18 years with plaque psoriasis in two phase 3 trials, ZBA4-1 and ZBA4-2. ZBA4-1 (N = 158) consisted of a 12-week, double-blind, vehicle-controlled treatment period (period 1) and a 12-week extension treatment period (period 2). Patients were randomized 2:1 to tapinarof or vehicle in period 1; subsequently, all patients who were enrolled in period 2 received tapinarof. ZBA4-2 (N = 305) was a 52-week, open-label, uncontrolled trial in which all patients received tapinarof. In period 1 of ZBA4-1, the proportion of patients who achieved a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) with ≥2-grade improvement from baseline at week 12 (PGA treatment success, the primary endpoint) was 20.06% in the tapinarof group and 2.50% in the vehicle group (p = 0.0035). The proportion of patients with ≥75% improvement from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score at week 12 (PASI75 response, a key secondary endpoint) was 37.7% in the tapinarof group and 3.8% in the vehicle group (p < 0.0001). In ZBA4-2, PGA treatment success rate was 30.0% at week 12, 51.3% at week 24, and 56.3% at week 52, and PASI75 response rate was 50.4% at week 12, 77.5% at week 24, and 79.9% at week 52, indicating that efficacy responses improved over time and were maintained over 52 weeks. Across the two trials, most adverse events (AEs) were mild or moderate; common AEs included folliculitis and contact dermatitis. In summary, tapinarof cream (1%) was efficacious and generally safe for up to 52 weeks of treatment in Japanese patients with plaque psoriasis.

Deucravacitinib Long-Term Efficacy Through 4 years in Week 16 Placebo Crossover Patients in the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and LTE Program

Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor, is approved in the US, EU, and other countries for treatment of adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis who are candidates for systemic therapy. Deucravacitinib was efficacious and well tolerated in two global, 52-week, phase 3 POETYK PSO-1 (NCT03624127) and POETYK PSO-2 (NCT03611751) parent trials, and through 2 additional years in the POETYK long-term extension (LTE) (NCT04036435) trial in patients treated with deucravacitinib from Day 1 of PSO-1/PSO-2. Here, long-term efficacy was assessed through 4 years in patients who crossed over from placebo to deucravacitinib at Week 16 in PSO-1 or PSO-2 and entered the LTE trial. Methods: PSO-1 and PSO-2 randomized patients 1:2:1 to oral placebo, deucravacitinib 6 mg once daily, or apremilast 30 mg twice daily. At Week 16, patients randomized to placebo crossed over to deucravacitinib. At Week 52, patients could enroll in the LTE and receive open-label deucravacitinib. Efficacy was evaluated in patients who crossed over from placebo to deucravacitinib at Week 16 of the parent trial and received continuous deucravacitinib through 4 years (Week 208; data cutoff, November 1, 2023). Outcomes included ≥75%/≥90% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75/90) and static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) (sPGA 0/1). Efficacy is reported using modified nonresponder imputation (mNRI) in patients who reached the Week 208 assessment or discontinued before Week 208. Results: Of 421 patients originally randomized to placebo, 348 crossed over to deucravacitinib at Week 16; 298 completed the parent trials and entered the LTE, with 291 meeting mNRI criteria. Efficacy response rates improved from Week 16 on placebo (PASI 75, 12.0% [95% CI, 8.5%-16.3%]; PASI 90, 3.4% [1.7%-6.2%]; sPGA 0/1, 10.0% [6.8%-14.0%]) through Week 52 on deucravacitinib (PASI 75, 75.2% [70.2%-80.2%]; PASI 90, 47.4% [41.6%-53.1%]; sPGA 0/1, 60.1% [54.5%-65.7%]). Response rates were maintained well through Week 208 (PASI 75, 75.6% [70.0%-81.2%]; PASI 90, 46.6% [40.4%-52.7%]; sPGA 0/1, 55.1% [48.8%-61.4%]). Conclusion: These findings support the long-term efficacy profile of once-daily oral deucravacitinib for treatment of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Deucravacitinib in Plaque Psoriasis: Maintenance of Response Over 4 Years in the Phase 3 POETYK PSO-1, PSO-2, and LTE Trials

Introduction: Deucravacitinib, an oral, selective, allosteric TYK2 inhibitor, was superior to placebo and apremilast in two global, phase 3 trials (POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2) in moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. At Week 52, patients could enter the POETYK long-term extension (LTE) trial and receive open-label deucravacitinib. Long-term efficacy was maintained through 3 total years of continuous treatment with no new safety signals in the ongoing LTE. Methods: Efficacy was further evaluated through Week 208 (4 years; data cutoff, November 1, 2023) in patients from the pooled PSO-1/PSO-2 populations who received continuous deucravacitinib from Day 1, achieved ≥75% reduction from baseline in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 75) at Week 16 (primary endpoint) or Week 24 (peak response), and entered the LTE. Maintenance of response assessments included PASI 75, PASI 90, and sPGA 0/1 (static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 [clear]/1 [almost clear]). Efficacy is reported using modified nonresponder imputation in patients who reached or discontinued before Week 208. Results: Of 513 patients who received continuous deucravacitinib from Day 1 and entered the LTE, PASI 75 was achieved by 313 (61.0%) and 336 (65.5%) patients at Week 16 and Week 24. Among Week 16 PASI 75 responders, response rates were maintained well from Week 16 to Week 208 (PASI 75: 100%, 84.4%; PASI 90: 55.7%, 57.4%; sPGA 0/1: 82.8%, 65.4%). Among Week 24 PASI 75 responders, response rates were also maintained from Week 24 to Week 208 (PASI 75: 100%, 84.6%; PASI 90: 62.7%, 58.2%; sPGA 0/1: 82.5%, 66.0%). Conclusion: Clinical efficacy was generally maintained with continuous deucravacitinib in the vast majority of Week 16 and Week 24 PASI 75 responders from the parent trials through 4 years, supporting the long-term effectiveness and treatment durability of once-daily oral deucravacitinib for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Spesolimab for generalized pustular psoriasis: a review of two key clinical trials supporting initial US regulatory approval.

Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a chronic, rare, and potentially life-threatening inflammatory disease, characterized by the rapid and widespread eruption of small, sterile pustules with surrounding skin erythema. Abnormal signaling of the interleukin-36 (IL-36) pathway appears to have a central role in GPP immunopathology, and provides a rational therapeutic target. Spesolimab is a first-in-class humanized monoclonal antibody that binds specifically to the IL-36 receptor, and antagonizes IL-36 signaling. Spesolimab obtained regulatory approval in the United States (US) in September 2022 for use in the treatment of GPP flares in adults, and was subsequently approved for GPP flare treatment in many other countries across the world. Recently, regulatory approval was granted for subcutaneous dosing of spesolimab for treatment of GPP when not experiencing a flare. Here, we review data from two key clinical trials that supported the initial US regulatory approval; namely, the phase 1 proof-of-concept trial (ClinicalTrials.gov ID, NCT02978690), and Effisayil™ 1 (NCT03782792), which remains the largest and only randomized clinical trial in patients experiencing GPP flares published to date. In the phase 1 proof-of-concept trial, a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear skin) was attained in 5/7 (71%) patients by week 1 and in all 7 patients by week 4; and the mean percent improvement in the Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) score from baseline was 59.0% at week 1, 73.2% at week 2, and 79.8% at week 4. In Effisayil™ 1, a GPPGA pustulation subscore of 0 (no visible pustules) was achieved in 19/35 (54%) patients receiving spesolimab at the end of week 1, versus 1/18 (6%) receiving placebo (difference, 49 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 21 to 67; P<0.001); and a GPPGA total score of 0 or 1 was achieved by 15/35 (43%) patients in the spesolimab group, versus 2/18 (11%) patients in the placebo group (difference, 32 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 53; P = 0.02). Infections at week 1 were reported in 6/35 (17%) patients receiving spesolimab and in 1/18 (6%) patients receiving placebo. These data demonstrate the efficacy and safety of spesolimab in providing rapid and sustained clinical improvement for patients with GPP flares, which translates into improved quality of life, by offering a targeted therapy for GPP.

Real-world safety and efficacy of biologics in elderly patients with psoriasis: A multicenter observational study.

Clinical trials of biologics have frequently excluded elderly patients, resulting in inadequate data on their safety and efficacy. Additionally, evidence of their safety and efficacy remains limited, despite some real-world studies. To assess the safety and efficacy of biologics in elderly patients with psoriasis, we compared these outcomes in younger patients using data from the West Japan Psoriasis Registry (WJPR). The WJPR consists of approximately 30 facilities in Western Japan, including various healthcare settings. This study enrolled 1395 patients who participated in the 2022 follow-up survey of the WJPR and were either using or had used biologics during the survey. These included 456 patients in the elderly group (≥65 years) and 939 patients in the younger group (<65 years). Treatment-ending adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 15.8% and 11.3% of elderly and younger patients, respectively. The incidence rate per 1000 patient-years (PY) for TEAEs was significantly higher in elderly patients than in younger patients (32.9 vs 23.2, p = 0.0234). Infectious diseases were more prevalent in the elderly group than the younger group; however, no significant difference in the frequency of infectious diseases was found between the two groups (p = 0.0807). Malignant neoplasms occurred significantly more frequently in the elderly group than in the younger group (p = 0.0169). Our results indicate a few concerns about infection when prescribing biologics to elderly patients. Biologics were effective for both elderly and younger patients. We found no significant differences in the proportion of patients with a body surface area score ≤3%, Physician's Global Assessment score 0/1, or Patient's Global Assessment score 0/1, as well as in the mean Dermatology Life Quality Index and the Itch Numerical Rating Scale between the younger and the elderly groups. Overall, our results confirm the appropriateness of using biologics in elderly patients with regard to safety and efficacy.

Functional status of Indian children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis.

The functional disability status of Indian children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis is unidentified. In this cross-sectional study functional capacity of 60 juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients was assessed by the Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire. A total of 60 juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients aged ranges from 1 to 12 years were recruited from a teaching hospital in eastern India. A childhood health assessment questionnaire was used to assess the functional health of children. Pain, patient's/parent's global assessment of general well-being, and physician's global assessment were assessed. Childhood health assessment questionnaire disability index for oligoarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis differed significantly from polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (P < 0.001), systemic-onset juvenile idiopathic arthritis (P = 0.018) and undifferentiated juvenile idiopathic arthritis (P < 0.001). There was a good to a strong positive correlation between the childhood health assessment questionnaire disability index with pain score, patient's/parent's global assessment score, and physician global assessment score for the total juvenile idiopathic arthritis cohort. regarding juvenile idiopathic arthritis subtypes, significant correlations were noted between the childhood health assessment questionnaire disability index with the patient's/parent's global assessment and physician's global assessment (except for enthesitis-related arthritis). Assessment and documentation of the functional health status of juvenile idiopathic arthritis patients will improve the management of the disease.

Phenotypic differences in clinical manifestations of generalized pustular psoriasis and severe plaque psoriasis in tropical Taiwan

Abstract Background: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is an uncommon variant of psoriasis. Clinical characteristics of GPP are limited due to its relatively low prevalence worldwide. Thus, the region-specific phenotypic differences between GPP and severe plaque psoriasis (SPP) remained not fully clarified. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the gender distribution, disease onset, clinical features, medical comorbidities, associated symptoms, laboratory findings, and potential precipitating factors of GPP and SPP in a single center in tropical Taiwan. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted for GPP and SPP in a tertiary medical center from 2003 to 2023. The GPP Area and Severity Index (GPPASI) and GPP Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) score were used to measure the severity of GPP. Results: A total of 26 patients with GPP (mean age: 48.2 years) and 50 patients with SPP (defined as psoriasis area and severity index over 20 and undergoing biological agents more than 1 year, mean age: 41.3 years) were included in this study. Forty-six percentage of the GPP patients had a preceding history of psoriasis. While there was no gender or age predominance, patients with GPP tended to develop fever, hypertension, upper respiratory tract infection, leukocytosis, elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, scalp involvement, be hospitalized and for a long time, along with allergy history of medications (diclofenac, ampicillin, and ceftriaxone), as compared to those with SPP. Hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections were less prevalent in GPP patients (with 15.4% and 3.8%, compared to 30.0% and 8.0% in SPP, respectively, although not statistically significant). The highest GPPASI and GPPGA scores occurred in young patients of GPP, but they are not associated with diseases of hypertension, hyperglycemia, or hyperlipidemia. Conclusion: Patients with GPP in Taiwan tended to have a higher hospitalization rate and longer mean hospitalization time along with increased occurrence of fever, leukocytosis, elevated CRP levels, and drug allergy. The younger patients of GPP tended to have higher GPPASI and GPPGA scores than the elder ones.

Cumulative Benefit Over 52Weeks With Deucravacitinib Versus Apremilast in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: POETYK PSO-1 Post Hoc Analysis.

Deucravacitinib demonstrated superior efficacy to apremilast in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in the POETYK PSO-1 and PSO-2 clinical trials. In the study reported here, we aimed to determine the overall 52-week cumulative clinical benefit of treatment initiated with deucravacitinib versus apremilast and to compare the 52-week cumulative benefit of initiating and staying on deucravacitinib versus initiating apremilast and continuing or switching to deucravacitinib at week 24 of treatment. This post hoc analysis of POETYK PSO-1 data (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03624127) determined the cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib 6mg once daily and apremilast 30mg twice daily in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Patients treated with apremilast who did not achieve a 50% reduction in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 50) at week 24 were switched to deucravacitinib. The cumulative clinical benefit of deucravacitinib versus apremilast over 52weeks was based on cumulative measures of ≥ 75% improvement from baseline in PASI score (PASI 75) and the proportion of patients with a static Physician Global Assessment score of 0 or 1 (sPGA 0/1). Ratios of area under the curve estimates between treatments were calculated and compared based on analysis of covariance regression models. Patients initiating deucravacitinib (N = 332) had a greater cumulative benefit as measured by the PASI 75 and sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast (N = 168). Over 52weeks, those initiating deucravacitinib experienced 50% more benefit as measured by PASI 75 and 58% more benefit as measured by sPGA 0/1 than those initiating apremilast. Results were consistent with the primary analysis when patients were classified by prior systemic and prior biologic therapy exposure. Results from this analysis corroborate the primary efficacy analysis supporting the use of deucravacitinib compared with apremilast for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis, regardless of prior systemic or biologic use.

The Typical Nail Lichen Planus Severity Index: An Outcome Instrument for Typical Nail Lichen Planus.

Despite numerous treatment options for nail lichen planus (NLP), a validated method for measuring the severity of NLP and therapeutic response in clinical trials is absent. The aim of the study was to develop and validate a measurement instrument, Typical Nail Lichen Planus Severity Index (tNLPSI), for typical NLP that could be used in clinical trials. A total of 48 patients pathologically confirmed with typical NLP were enrolled in this study. Five dermatologists were trained to use the tNLPSI activity scale and the Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) scale to score samples independently to estimate inter-rater and intra-rater reliability across two sessions. In addition, tNLPSI activity scores were compared with PGA scores to assess the construct validity. The tNLPSI activity scale had excellent internal consistency and inter-rater reliability (Cronbach's alpha 0.990; ICC = 0.954; 95% CI = 0.930-0.971), and the correlations between the different graders' scores indicate good consistency (rp = 0.934-0.968). In addition, the tNLPSI activity scale demonstrated high intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.996; 95% CI = 0.993-0.998), showing good reproducibility. And tNLPSI activity scores and PGA scores showed good construct validity (Spearman's rho = 0.941 and Spearman's rho = 0.903-0.935, respectively; p &lt; 0.01). The tNLPSI activity scale was demonstrated to be consistent, reliable, reproducible, and feasible, making it a potential valuable tool for evaluating the treatment response in typical NLP clinical trials.

Combination of Plasma Rich in Growth Factors With Topical 4% Hydroquinone Compared With Topical 4% Hydroquinone Alone in the Treatment of Dermal Type of Melasma: A Single-Blinded Randomized Split-Face Study.

Response to the current available treatments of melasma, dermal type, in particular, is usually gradual and can result in possible side effects. In this study, we aim to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) and topical 4% hydroquinone (HQ) in comparison with monotherapy using topical 4% HQ alone in the treatment of dermal type of melasma. This is a single-blinded, randomized, split-face clinical trial on twenty female patients with dermal type of melasma. Patients were asked to apply topical 4% HQ on both sides of their face at night for 6 months. In each participant, one side of the face was randomly chosen to receive monthly intradermal injections of PRGF for 3 sessions. Efficacy of the treatment was assessed using hemi melasma area and severity index (MASI) score, physician's global assessment (PGA), and patients' global assessment (PtGA). Both groups revealed significant improvement in hemi-MASI score during the treatment course. Mean percentage of improvement at the end of study was 40.38 ± 6.04% and 33.42 ± 3.23% in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.31). PGA demonstrated excellent-to-marked improvement in melasma in 25% and 5% of patients in the combination therapy and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = 0.31). PtGA showed high levels of satisfaction in 15% of patients in the combination therapy group (vs. 0% in the monotherapy group) (P = 0.05). Differences between the two treatment groups in terms of hemi-MASI and PGA scores were not statistically significant; however, patients demonstrated higher satisfaction with combination of PRGF and topical 4% HQ compared with topical HQ alone. Thereby, combination of PRGF and topical 4% HQ can be suggested as a safe alternative therapeutic approach and may hold promise in the development of future therapeutic options for dermal type of melasma.

Consistent Efficacy of Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis Regardless of Baseline Disease Severity or Special Area Involvement: Subgroup Analysis from PROMINENT.

Psoriasis involvement in special areas (e.g., scalp or nails) is associated with a great disease burden yet it is often inadequately treated with topical treatments. The efficacy and tolerability of apremilast plus existing topical therapy in Japanese patients with mild to moderate plaque psoriasis were demonstrated in PROMINENT, a phase 3b, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study. We evaluated the efficacy of apremilast across disease severities and special areas involved in these patients. In PROMINENT, patients received apremilast 30mg twice daily for 16weeks in addition to their existing topical therapy, with the option of topical therapy reduction at the discretion of their physician while continuing apremilast treatment from Weeks 16 to 32. We performed a post hoc analysis, assessing apremilast efficacy and safety in Japanese patients stratified by baseline static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) score (2 [mild] or 3 [moderate]) and special area involvement. Of patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3, 62.7% and 30.7%, respectively, achieved sPGA score 0 or 1 at Week 32. At Week 32, improvements in skin, nail, scalp, and quality of life assessments were observed regardless of baseline sPGA score. Improvements in these endpoints at Week 32 were also observed in patients with special area (scalp or nail) involvement (n = 134). Incidence of adverse events was similar between patients with baseline sPGA = 2 and sPGA = 3. Apremilast in combination with topical therapy may be a beneficial treatment for Japanese patients, who have limited systemic treatment options for mild to moderate psoriasis or psoriasis in special areas. NCT03930186.

Exploring the Severity Strata of Disease Activity and Repigmentation in Vitiligo Based on Validated Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Scores.

Background/Objectives: There is currently no guidance on how to interpret the global degrees of activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) in vitiligo. Stratification into global degrees can be completed for static evaluations (e.g., visible disease activity signs) and dynamic assessments (e.g., evolution over time). For the latter, the Vitiligo Disease Activity Score (VDAS15&60) and Vitiligo Disease Improvement Score (VDIS15&60) were recently validated. Methods: In the current study, a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) for disease activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) was evaluated for validity (construct) and reliability (inter- and intrarater) based on a photo set of 66 patients. Subsequently, the PGA activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) were used to stratify the Vitiligo Extent Score plus (VESplus), VDAS15&60 or VDIS15&60 into three global categories (slightly, moderately and much worse/improved), based on ROC analysis. Results: For the VESplus, cut-off values for the categories 'slightly, moderately and much worse' were >0.3%, >27.71% and >128.75% BSA (relative changes in the affected total BSA), respectively. For the categories 'slightly, moderately and much improved', they were >0%, >4.87% and >36.88% BSA (relative changes in the affected total BSA), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of the number of active (VDAS15) body areas were >0 areas for slightly worse, >2 areas for moderately worse and >7 for much worse. For VDIS15, the cut-off values for slightly improved and moderately improved were >0 and >1. For VDAS60 and VDIS60, the cut-off points were >0.5, >3, >9.5 and >0.5 and >1.5, respectively. The results should be interpreted with caution in patients with extensive vitiligo due to the rather limited disease extent of the included patient population (VESplus (median: 3.2%)). Conclusions: This research will aid in the development of more detailed international definitions.