Physician-reported Outcomes Research Articles

Effectiveness of N-3 fatty acids supplementation on spondyloarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background & AimsThe study aims to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effects of n-3 fatty acids (FA) supplementation on spondyloarthritis (SpA) disease activity, inflammatory markers, and imaging. MethodsThe study protocol was developed and registered online in advance. The PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) electronic databases were systematically searched for RCTs up to April 2024. Two independent reviewers screened, assessed for eligibility, and extracted data from the eligible RCTs. The revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the quality of trials. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled estimates. ResultsWe included four RCTs, involving 245 patients with SpA. Supplementation with n-3 FA did not improve physician-reported outcomes [number of tender joints (four trials, standardized mean difference (SMD): -0.22; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.74 to 0.29; I2=61%), number of swollen joints (two trials, SMD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.42 to 0.15; I2=0%)], and patient-reported outcomes [pain (three trials, SMD: -0.16; 95% CI: -1.03 to 0.70; I2=74%), Health Assessment Questionnaire (three trials, SMD: -0.04; 95% CI: -0.78 to 0.70; I2=71%). The other nine pre-specified outcomes were not analyzed due to lack of information from the original RCTs which were evaluated as «some concerns» or «high risk» of bias. ConclusionsIn the present systematic review and meta-analysis including placebo-controlled RCTs, n-3 FA supplementation did not show improvement in the reported outcomes. Future RCTs should be conducted with homogenous intervention, placebo, and outcomes to re-examine possible beneficial effects.

7217 Impact of INZ-701 on Bone and Mineral Metabolism Biomarkers and Clinical Outcomes in Adults with ENPP1 Deficiency - Results from 48-week Phase 1/2 Open Label Study

Abstract Disclosure: K. Gunter: Employee; Self; Inozyme Pharma. Stock Owner; Self; Inozyme Pharma. R.A. Wermers: Research Investigator; Self; Inozyme Pharma. R. Fuhr: Employee; Self; Parexel GmbH. Research Investigator; Self; Inozyme Pharma. D. Schnabel: Research Investigator; Self; Inozyme Pharma. A. Besancon: Research Investigator; Self; Inozyme Pharma. M.A. Nour: Research Investigator; Self; Inozyme Pharma. D. Wenkert: Stock Owner; Self; Inozyme Pharma. Y. Sabbagh: Employee; Self; Inozyme Pharma. Stock Owner; Self; Inozyme Pharma. Background: ENPP1 Deficiency is a rare disorder due to inactivating mutations in the ENPP1 gene that result in low levels of inorganic pyrophosphate (PPi), a critical regulator of mineralization. Subsequent pathologic soft tissue calcification results in severe vascular calcification and ∼50% infant mortality. By early adolescence the majority of survivors develop FGF-23 mediated hypophosphatemic rickets, characterized by bone deformities, short stature, joint/ligament calcification and musculoskeletal pain. No targeted therapy exists for this disease. INZ-701 is a recombinant ENPP1-Fc investigational product. Purpose: To describe the safety, tolerability, immunogenicity, and exploratory efficacy (bone and mineral metabolism biomarkers and clinical outcomes) of INZ-701 in adults with ENPP1 Deficiency through the end of the phase 2 study period (week 48). Methods: Phase 1/2, multicenter, open-label, multiple ascending dose study including three adults in each of three dose cohorts (0.2, 0.6 and 1.8 mg/kg, total N=9) with genetic variants in ENPP1 and PPi <1300 nM (NCT04686175). Participants were dosed subcutaneously on Day 1, then twice weekly from Day 8 to end of study. Data through wk 48 as of July 6, 2023 are included; topline wk 48 data will be presented. Per protocol, participants may continue to receive INZ-701 beyond wk 48. Results: Rapid increase in mean PPi from baseline of 426±407 nM was noted in all patients, reaching the healthy volunteer range within 6 hrs of the first dose with sustained elevation through wk 48. Mean PPi across the 0.2, 0.6 and 1.8 mg/kg dose cohorts from day 32 to wk 48 was 1299±131 nM, 1356±136 nM, and 1282±81 nM, respectively. There were improvements from baseline to wk 48 in mean pooled FGF-23 (-22 pg/mL) and serum phosphate (+0.18 mg/dL), with dose-dependent changes in bone specific alkaline phosphatase consistent with bone healing. DEXA revealed improvements in spine BMD and BMC. There were trends towards improvement in mean % predicted change in 6MWT from baseline to wk 48: cohort 1, 76.7% (SE 10.5) to 85.0% (SE 3.0); cohort 2, 52.2% (SE 10.9 ) to 79.0% (SE 2.9); cohort 3, wk 48 data not available. Improvements were also observed in physician and patient global impression of change score (with no patients deteriorating) and PROMIS pain intensity score. INZ-701 was well tolerated with no drug-related serious or severe (> grade 2) adverse events. Low titers of non-neutralizing anti-drug antibodies (≤160) were observed in 7/9 patients. Long half-life of approximately 126 hours suggests the potential for once-weekly dosing. Conclusions: In adults with ENPP1 Deficiency, INZ-701 was well tolerated with no related serious or severe adverse events. INZ-701 demonstrated a rapid and sustained increase in PPi levels from baseline to week 48 with corresponding improvements in bone mineral biomarkers, functional performance, and patient and physician-reported outcomes. Presentation: 6/3/2024

50629 Impact of Achieving F-VASI 75 or T-VASI 50 on Patient- and Physician-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Non-Segmental Vitiligo (NSV) Receiving Upadacitinib During a Phase 2 Study

50629 Impact of Achieving F-VASI 75 or T-VASI 50 on Patient- and Physician-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Non-Segmental Vitiligo (NSV) Receiving Upadacitinib During a Phase 2 Study

Disease characteristics and medications use in idiopathic inflammatory myopathy: a multi-center prospective observational study of decentralized remote vs. traditional clinic enrollment.

Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies (IIM) are rare and characterized by heterogeneous manifestations and clinical trajectories. Utilizing tele-research methods has the potential to improve participant recruitment and advance the understanding of the disease. We aimed to evaluate disease characteristics in IIM patients throughout the U.S. and compare these parameters between patients recruited remotely through mobile application or website vs those recruited locally in myositis clinics. "Myositis Patient Centered Tele-Research" (My PACER) is a multicentre prospective observational study of U.S. IIM subjects, competitively recruited through traditional in-person clinic visits (Center-Based Cohort [CBC]), and remotely using mobile application or website and social media (Tele-Research Cohort [TRC]). Data collection comprised baseline demographic and clinical variables, encompassing symptoms, organ involvement, diagnostic tests results and medication use. The study included 120 IIM patients, 82 in the TRC and 38 in the CBC. The average age was 55 ± 13.4, 75% females and 81% Caucasians. Both cohorts exhibited similar demographic characteristics. Overall, 41% dermatomyositis, 27% polymyositis, 23% anti-synthetase syndrome, and 9% necrotizing myositis patients were enrolled, with comparable subtypes prevalence among cohorts (p= 0.85). The groups demonstrated similarities in multiple clinical factors, including muscle enzymes, diagnostic delay, employment status, various patient and physician-reported outcomes, functional tests, and the frequency of abnormal findings in chest CT, pulmonary function tests, and electromyography. TRC patients received biologics and csDMARDs more frequently (p< 0.001 and p= 0.013, respectively). Tele-research recruitment yielded a patient cohort resembling traditionally recruited patients demographically and clinically, indicating its effectiveness for robust and diverse patient recruitment in clinical studies.

A Real-World Comparison of Clinical Effectiveness in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis Treated with Upadacitinib, Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors, and Other Advanced Therapies After Switching from an Initial Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitor.

This study compared the clinical effectiveness of switching from tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) to upadacitinib (TNFi-UPA), another TNFi (TNFi-TNFi), or an advanced therapy with another mechanism of action (TNFi-other MOA) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Data were drawn from the Adelphi RA Disease Specific Programme™, a cross-sectional survey administered to rheumatologists and their consulting patients in Germany, France, Italy, Spain, the UK, Japan, Canada, and the USA from May2021 to January 2022. Patients who switched treatment from an initial TNFi were stratified by subsequent therapy of interest: TNFi-UPA, TNFi-TNFi, or TNFi-other MOA. Physician-reported clinical outcomes including disease activity (with formal DAS28 scoring available for 29% of patients) categorized as remission, low/moderate/high disease activity, as well as pain were recorded at initiation of current treatment and ≥ 6months from treatment switch. Fatigue and treatment adherence were measured ≥ 6months from treatment switch. Inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment compared outcomes by subsequent class of therapy: TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-TNFi, or TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-other MOA. Of 503 patients who switched from their first TNFi, 261 were in TNFi-UPA, 128 in TNFi-TNFi, and 114 in TNFi-other MOA groups. At the time of switch, most patients had moderate/high disease activity (TNFi-UPA: 73%; TNFi-TNFi: 52%; TNFi-other MOA: 60%). After adjustment for differences in characteristics at point of switch, patients in TNFi-UPA group (n = 261) were significantly more likely to achieve physician-reported remission (67.7% vs. 40.3%; p = 0.0015), no pain (55.7% vs. 25.4%; p = 0.0007), and complete adherence (60.0% vs. 34.2%; p = 0.0049) compared with patients in TNFi-TNFi group (n = 121). Similar findings were observed for TNFi-UPA versus TNFi-other MOA groups (n = 111). Patients who switched from TNFi to UPA had significantly better clinical outcomes of remission, no pain, and complete adherence than those who cycled TNFi or switched to another MOA.

The UPDATE trial (UVBPhototherapy in Dermatology for ATopic Eczema): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of narrowband UVB with optimal topical therapy versus optimal topical therapy in patients with atopic eczema

BackgroundNarrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy is commonly prescribed for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema (AE). The efficacy of NB-UVB, however, has not yet properly been established, as current evidence is of low certainty. Our aim is to assess the short-term and long-term (cost-)effectiveness and safety of NB-UVB in adult AE patients by performing a pragmatic, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial. This protocol outlines its methodology.MethodsA pragmatic, multicenter, PROBE trial will be performed with 1:1 randomization of 316 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AE who have inadequate disease control with topical therapy and who are eligible for optimal topical therapy (OTT) or NB-UVB in combination with OTT as a next step. Participants in the interventional arm will receive a minimum of 3 months of OTT combined with 8 to 16 weeks of NB-UVB. The control group receives 3 months of OTT. Following the interventional phase, follow-up will continue for 9 months. Physician-reported and patient-reported outcomes (according to the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Core Outcome Set) and adverse events are assessed at 4 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.DiscussionThe UPDATE trial aims to provide high-quality evidence regarding the (cost-)effectiveness and safety of NB-UVB phototherapy in moderate-to-severe AE patients. Challenges that are addressed in the protocol include the possible bias arising from applying open-label treatment and the necessity of introducing OTT into the study design to prevent a high dropout rate.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT05704205. Registered on December 8, 2022.

Clinical trials in older patients with cancer - typical challenges, possible solutions, and a paradigm of study design in breast cancer.

While the prevalence of older breast cancer patients is rapidly increasing, these patients are greatly underrepresented in clinical trials. We discuss barriers to recruitment of older patients to clinical trials and propose solutions on how to mitigate these challenges and design optimal clinical trials through the paradigm of IMPORTANT trial. This is a narrative review of the current literature evaluating barriers to including older breast cancer patients in clinical trials and how mitigating strategies can be implemented in a pragmatic clinical trial. The recognized barriers can be roughly divided into trial design-related (e.g. the adoption of strict inclusion criteria, the lack of pre-specified age-specific analysis), patient-related (e.g. lack of knowledge, valuation of the quality-of-life instead of survival, transportation issues), or physician-related (e.g. concern for toxicity). Several strategies to mitigate barriers have been identified and should be considered when designing a clinical trial dedicated to older patients with cancer. The pragmatic, de-centralized IMPORTANT trial focusing on dose optimization of CDK4/6 -inhibitors in older breast cancer patients is a paradigm of a study design where different mitigating strategies have been adopted. Because of the existing barriers, older adults in clinical trials are considerably healthier than the average older patients treated in clinical practice. Thus, the study results cannot be generalized to the older population seen in daily clinical practice. Broader inclusion/exclusion criteria, offering telehealth visits, and inclusion of patient-reported, instead of physician-reported outcomes may increase older patient participation in clinical trials.

CO71 Characterization of Physician-Reported Outcomes of People with HIV Switching Treatment: Findings from a Real-World Survey in the United States

CO71 Characterization of Physician-Reported Outcomes of People with HIV Switching Treatment: Findings from a Real-World Survey in the United States

343P Physician-reported treatment patterns and outcomes in marginal zone lymphoma in South Korea

343P Physician-reported treatment patterns and outcomes in marginal zone lymphoma in South Korea

Prospective analysis of patient-reported outcomes and physician-reported outcomes with gynecologic cancer chemotherapy.

Gynecologic cancer chemotherapy impacts the quality of life (QOL) of patients, with lasting adverse events that may require treatment adjustments or discontinuation. Consequently, real-time symptom monitoring before outpatient visits has resulted in improved QOL for patients and extended survival times. This study investigated whether there are differences between electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PRO-CTCAE) and physician-assessed outcomes (NCI-CTCAE) evaluated in an outpatient setting in gynecologic cancer chemotherapy. The study was conducted on 50 patients who received their first chemotherapy treatment at St. Marianna University Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology from July 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. PRO-CTCAE and NCI-CTCAE were evaluated at each instance of chemotherapy and 2 weeks after. The PRO-CTCAE was additionally collected weekly using e-PRO. The values for "Joint Pain," "Nausea," "Taste Disturbance," "Constipation," "Insomnia," "Fatigue," "Limb Edema," and "Concentration Impairment" were consistently higher in PRO-CTCAE than in NCI-CTCAE, indicating that physicians underestimated the severity of adverse events. In contrast, there was no significant difference in "Peripheral Neuropathy," demonstrating that physicians had a good understanding of this condition in patients. The weekly responses obtained from e-PRO revealed that symptom exacerbations peaked outside of clinic visits. This study demonstrated physicians tend to underestimate most adverse events. Moreover, the responses using e-PRO revealed peak symptom deterioration occurred outside of outpatient visits. This suggested that e-PRO and actions taken in response to them can improve patients' QOL.

Effects of blended learning training for oncology physicians to advise their patients about complementary and integrative therapies: results from the multicenter cluster-randomized KOKON-KTO trial

BackgroundMany oncology physicians are confronted with the topic of complementary and integrative medicine (CIM) by cancer patients. This study examined whether a blended learning (e-learning and a workshop) to train oncology physicians in providing advice on CIM therapies to their cancer patients, in addition to distributing an information leaflet about reputable CIM websites, had different effects on physician-reported outcomes in regard to consultations compared with only distributing the leaflet.MethodsIn a multicenter, cluster-randomized trial, 48 oncology physicians were randomly allocated to an intervention group (CIM consultation and an information leaflet) or a control group (information leaflet only). After the training, the oncology physicians conducted 297 consultations with their cancer patients. Measurements were assessed at oncology physician, physician–patient-interaction (measured by external reviewers), and patient levels. This analysis focused on the physician outcomes of stress reaction and perceived consultation skill competency. In addition, qualitative interviews were conducted with a subsample of oncology physicians who experienced both, the intervention and control condition.ResultsThe oncology physicians in the intervention group showed a lower stress reaction in all measured dimensions after CIM consultations than those in the control group. There was no significant difference between oncology physicians in the intervention and control groups regarding the perceived consultation skill competency (overburden: intervention 1.4 [95% CI: 0.7;2.1]; control 2.1 [95% CI: 1.4;2.7], tension: 1.3 [95% CI: 0.7;2.0] vs. 1.9 [95% CI: 1.3;2.5], and discomfort with consultation situations: 1.0 [95% CI: 0.4;1.7]; vs. 1.7 [95% CI: 1.2;2.3]). The qualitative data showed that only providing the leaflet seemed impersonal to oncology physicians, while the training made them feel well prepared to conduct a full conversation about CIM and provide the information leaflet.ConclusionsIn our exploratory study providing structured CIM consultations showed positive effects on the perceived stress of oncology physicians, and the training was subjectively experienced as an approach that improved physician preparation for advising cancer patients about CIM, however no effects regarding perceived consultation skill competency were found.Trial registrationThe trial registration number of the KOKON-KTO study is DRKS00012704 in the German Clinical Trials Register (Date of registration: 28.08.2017).

Physicianreported treatment patterns and outcomes in metastatic bladder cancer in the USA: the CancerMPact® Survey 2020.

Aim: This study assessed physician-reported treatment patterns for metastatic bladder cancer. Materials & methods: A total of106 USA-based physicians were surveyed in 2020 using the CancerMPact® online survey. Results: Among cisplatin-eligible patients, 86.1% received first-line (1L) platinum-containing chemotherapy, most commonly cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and 9.8% received immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy. Among cisplatin-ineligible patients, 46.5% received 1L platinum-containing chemotherapy, most commonly carboplatin plus gemcitabine and 46.2% received 1L immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Approximately 44% of patients who received 1L treatment received second-line (2L) therapy after progression. Conclusion: Platinum-containing chemotherapy was the most widely reported 1L treatment approach. A high proportion of patients received no 2L therapy. Validation in an updated dataset is warranted following the practice-changing approvals of avelumab 1L maintenance and additional 2L options.

Long-term Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib for Atopic Dermatitisin a Real-world Setting: An Interim Analysis Through 48 Weeks of Observation.

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, including upadacitinib, have been recently approved for the treatment of moderate-severe atopic dermatitis (AD) and real-world data on upadacitinib effectiveness and safety are limited. This interim analysis aimed to assess effectiveness and safety of upadacitinib throughout 48 weeks of observation in a real-world adult AD population. This prospective study collected data on adult patients affected by moderate-to-severe AD and treated with upadacitinib at the dosage of either 15 mg or 30 mg daily based on the physician decision. Upadacitinib was prescribed in the context of a national compassionate use programme. In this interim analysis, within patient comparisons of continuous scores of different scales (namely Eczema Area andSeverity Index [EASI], body surface area [BSA], Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI], Patient Oriented Eczema Measure [POEM], Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] subtests) were performed. The percentage of patients achieving EASI 75, EASI 90 and EASI 100 at Week 16, 32 and 48 was also evaluated. One hundred and forty-six patients were included in the analysis. Upadacitinib 15 mg or 30 mg daily was prescribed as monotherapy in most cases (127/146, 87.0%). Upadacitinib was initially prescribed at the dosage of 30 mg daily in 118 of 146 (80.8%) patients and 15 mg daily in 28/146 (19.2%) patients. A significant improvement in the clinical signs and symptoms of AD was detected by Week 16 andthroughout the study period. EASI 75, EASI 90 and EASI 100 responses were achieved by 87.6%, 69.1% and 44.3% at Week 48, associated with a sustained reduction in the mean values of all physician-reported (EASI and BSA) and patient-reported (Itch- Sleep- and Pain-NRS, DLQI, and POEM) disease severity outcomes, up to 48 weeks of treatment. Treatment response observed in 15 mg upadacitinib-treated patients was comparable with that detected in 30 mg upadacitinib-treated patients, revealing no statistical difference between the two patient sub-cohorts. Through the observation period, dose reduction or escalation was observed in 38/146 (26%) of treated cases. Overall, 26 of 146 (17.8%) patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE) during the treatment period. In total, 29 AEs were recorded and most of them were evaluated as mild to moderate, while in 4 cases the occurrence of AE led to drug discontinuation, for a total of 7/146 (4.8%) dropouts. This study provides strong evidence of a sustained response obtained by upadacitinib in AD patients, who had failed to respond to conventional or biological systemic agents, through 48 weeks of observation. Upadacitinib wasalso demonstrated to be advantageous in terms of flexibility in dose reduction or escalation as upadacitinib dose was shaped on clinical needs that, in a real-world setting, might frequently change.

Real-World, Retrospective, Multicenter, Observational Study on the Use of the First Liquid AbobotulinumtoxinA in Italy.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested that liquid formulation of botulinum toxin typeA (aboBoNT-A) is safe and effective, but data confirming these characteristics in a real-life heterogenous set of patients are currently lacking. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the ready-to-use aboBoNT-A solution in adults with moderate-to-severe glabellar wrinkles. In this real-life, multicenter, retrospective, observational study, healthy adults were treated at baseline only with aboBoNT-A solution on the glabellar area and followed up for 24weeks. Re-treatment after 20-24weeks could also be combined with other aesthetic procedures. Family history of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) was not an exclusion criterion. Patient-reported outcomes (patient's satisfaction and injection-related pain) and physician-reported outcomes (Physician Global Assessment, PGA) were collected. Of the 542 patients enrolled in the study, 38 had IMID family history. Injection-related pain was reported in 128 (23.62%) as mild (pain VAS = 1.34 ± 0.87) mainly by non-botulinum toxin treatment-naïve women under 50years of age. At 48h, physicians rated the clinical result as "improved" in 64% of patients, conversely 264 patients (48.71%) self-evaluated as "satisfied"/"very satisfied". At 4weeks a touch-up (< 10 units) was performed in 11 (2.03%) patients and 98.2% were "highly satisfied". Re-treatment was performed in 330 (61.45%) patients, mainly botulinum-experienced, at 20weeks and in 207 (38.55%), mainly botulinum naïve, at 24weeks. A total of 403 (74.35%) patients were re-treated with the three-point technique and 201 (37.08%) also received hyaluronic acid filler in the lower central face and middle third. There were no cases of denovo IMIDs. Real-world data confirmed that aboBoNT-A is a fast, efficient, durable, reproducible, and easy-to-use drug which is also well tolerated in patients with family history of IMID.

Does cost minimization of hypofractionated radiation therapy content all health stakeholders?

Does cost minimization of hypofractionated radiation therapy content all health stakeholders?

Flares in IIMs and the timeline following COVID-19 vaccination: a combined analysis of the COVAD-1 and -2 surveys.

Disease flares in the post-coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination period represent a prominent concern, though risk factors are poorly understood. We studied these flares among patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and other autoimmune rheumatic diseases (AIRDs). The COVAD-1 and -2 global surveys were circulated in early 2021 and 2022, respectively, and we captured demographics, comorbidities, AIRDs details, COVID-19 infection history and vaccination details. Flares of IIMs were defined as (a) patient self-reported, (b) immunosuppression (IS) denoted, (c) clinical sign directed and (d) with >7.9-point minimal clinically significant improvement difference worsening of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) PROMISPF10a score. Risk factors of flares were analysed using regression models. Of 15 165 total respondents, 1278 IIMs (age 63 years, 70.3% female, 80.8% Caucasians) and 3453 AIRDs were included. Flares of IIM were seen in 9.6%, 12.7%, 8.7% and 19.6% patients by definitions (a) to (d), respectively, with a median time to flare of 71.5 (10.7-235) days, similar to AIRDs. Patients with active IIMs pre-vaccination (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.03, 1.6, P = 0.025) were prone to flares, while those receiving rituximab (OR 0.3; 95% CI 0.1, 0.7, P = 0.010) and AZA (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.8, P = 0.016) were at lower risk. Female gender and comorbidities predisposed to flares requiring changes in IS. Asthma (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.05, 2.50, P = 0.028) and higher pain visual analogue score (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.11, 1.27, P < 0.001) were associated with disparity between self-reported and IS-denoted flares. A diagnosis of IIMs confers an equal risk of flares in the post-COVID-19 vaccination period to AIRDs, with active disease, female gender and comorbidities conferring a higher risk. Disparity between patient- and physician-reported outcomes represents a future avenue for exploration.

Abstract 3360: Negative predictive value of circulating tumor tissue modified viral HPV DNA for identifying recurrence among patients treated for HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer

Abstract Purpose: Despite favorable outcomes, up to 20% of patients with human papillomavirus (HPV)-driven oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) will experience recurrence. Monitoring circulating tumor tissue modified viral (TTMV)-HPV DNA during post-treatment surveillance has emerged as a tool that has demonstrated &amp;gt;95% positive predictive value (PPV) for detecting recurrence. Here we describe a large real-world population with detailed clinical follow-up, permitting determination of the longitudinal negative predictive value (NPV) of the assay. Patients and methods: This IRB-approved, retrospective observational cohort study included 312 patients across five U.S. centers who were ≥3 months post-treatment for HPV-driven OPSCC. Patients had one or more TTMV-HPV DNA results (NavDx®, Naveris Laboratories) obtained during surveillance between February 2020 and January 2021. A baseline TTMV-HPV DNA test was not required. HPV status was assessed by p16 immunohistochemistry or HPV PCR/ISH. Test results were correlated with physician-reported exam and imaging findings to assess disease status in follow-up. Results: The cohort was mostly male (85%), had a median age of 61 (range: 27-81), included smokers (50%), and 282 (90%) had involved nodes (N1: 204, N2: 70, N3: 8) at initial staging. Curative-intent treatment involved surgery with or without another modality in 54% of cases (169/312). Median follow-up time was 23.5 months, and 39 patients (12.5%) had documented recurrence. Most patients had &amp;gt;1 TTMV-HPV DNA test result ≥3 months post-treatment (231, 74%), with 48 (15%) having 5 or more tests. Among patients with multiple negative surveillance tests, the median time between tests was 126 days (4.2 months, range: 0.37-24.2). The first TTMV-HPV DNA surveillance test was most often performed within the first year post-treatment (195, 63%). Across 812 test results, the NPV was 99.5%. There were 4 false negative tests among patients with confirmed p16-positive (3/4) or HPV PCR-positive (1/4) biopsy-proven recurrence. One of these patients had a subsequent positive TTMV-HPV DNA test during salvage immunotherapy. Only one of these patients had baseline TTMV-HPV DNA testing available, which showed a low positive &amp;lt;50 TTMV-HPV16 DNA Score, whereas the other three patients did not have a baseline result available. Conclusion: Our findings further support the clinical potential of monitoring circulating TTMV-HPV DNA during post-treatment surveillance. We demonstrate a very high assay NPV correlated with physician-reported outcomes. TTMV-HPV DNA can be used to assist in surveillance and could inform imaging needs and future practice guidelines for HPV-driven head and neck cancer survivors. Citation Format: Glenn J. Hanna, Scott Roof, James Jabalee, Eleni M. Rettig, Rocco M. Ferrandino, Sida Chen, Marshall Posner, Krzysztof J. Misiukiewicz, Eric M. Genden, Raymond L. Chai, John Sims, Elaine Thrash, Scott J. Stern, Adam Raben, Lydia I. Clements, Abie H. Mendelsohn, Charlotte Kuperwasser, Catherine Del Vecchio Fitz, Barry M. Berger. Negative predictive value of circulating tumor tissue modified viral HPV DNA for identifying recurrence among patients treated for HPV-driven oropharyngeal cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 3360.

Musculoskeletal Ultrasound and the Assessment of Disease Activity in Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis.

To determine the frequency of subclinical synovitis on musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSUS) in juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and correlate patient- and provider-reported outcome measures with MSUS synovitis. JIA patients with an active joint count (AJC) of >4 underwent a 42-joint MSUS performed at baseline and 3 months. B-mode and power Doppler images were obtained and scored (range 0-3) for each of the 42 joints. Outcomes evaluated included physician global assessment of disease activity (PhGA), patient global assessment of disease activity (PtGA), patient pain, Childhood Health Assessment Questionnaire (C-HAQ), and AJC. Subclinical synovitis was defined as synovitis detected by MSUS only. Generalized estimation equations were used to test the relationship between clinical arthritis (positive/negative) and subclinical synovitis (positive/negative). Spearman's correlation coefficients (rs ) were calculated to determine the association between MSUS synovitis and patient- and physician-reported outcomes. In 30 patients, subclinical synovitis was detected in 30% of joints. Clinical arthritis of the fingers, wrists, and knee joints was significantly associated with MSUS synovitis in these joints. PtGA and the C-HAQ had a moderate (rs =0.44, P= 0.014) to weak (rs =0.37, P=0.045) correlation with MSUS synovitis. There was a statistically significant strong correlation between MSUS synovitis and PhGA (rs =0.61, P=0.001), but a weak correlation with AJC (rs =0.37, P=0.048) at the follow-up visit. Subclinical synovitis was commonly observed in this cohort of JIA patients. The fair-to-moderate correlation of MSUS synovitis with patient- and provider-reported outcomes suggests that MSUS assesses a different, possibly more objective, domain not determined by traditional JIA outcome measurements.

Disease Burden and Physician-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Patients With Hereditary Angioedema: Data From A Real-World Study

Disease Burden and Physician-Reported Outcomes in Pediatric Patients With Hereditary Angioedema: Data From A Real-World Study

Rituximab for Pediatric Central Nervous System Inflammatory Disorders in Alberta, Canada.

Early and effective treatment of central nervous system (CNS) inflammatory disorders is vital to reduce neurologic morbidity and improve long-term outcomes in affected children. Rituximab is a B-cell-depleting monoclonal antibody whose off-label use for these disorders is funded in the province of Alberta, Canada, by the Short-Term Exceptional Drug Therapy (STEDT) program. This study describes the use of rituximab for pediatric CNS inflammatory disorders in Alberta. Rituximab applications for CNS inflammatory indications in patients <18 years of age were identified from the STEDT database between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2019. Patient information was linked to other provincial datasets including the Discharge Abstract Database, Pharmaceutical Information Network, and Provincial Laboratory data. Analysis was descriptive. Fifty-one unique rituximab applications were identified, of which 50 were approved. New applications increased from one in 2012 to a high of 12 in 2018. The most common indication was autoimmune encephalitis without a specified antibody (n = 16, 31%). Most children were approved for a two-dose (n = 33, 66%) or four-dose (n = 16, 32%) induction regimen. Physician-reported outcomes were available for 24 patients, of whom 14 (58%) were felt to have fully met outcome targets. The use of rituximab for pediatric CNS inflammatory disorders has increased, particularly for the indication of autoimmune encephalitis. This study identified significant heterogeneity in dosing practices and laboratory monitoring. Standardized protocols for the use of rituximab in these disorders and more robust outcome reporting will help better define the safety and efficacy of rituximab in this population.