Physician Assistants Research Articles

Point of Care Ultrasounds Obtained by Novice Physician Assistant Residents (POCUS ON PAR).

The integration of Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) into the care of trauma patients, specifically the E-FAST, has improved the accuracy of initial diagnoses and improved time to surgical intervention in critically ill patients. Physician assistants (PAs) are critically important members of any military trauma resuscitation team and are often team leaders in a pre-hospital setting. They may receive training in ultrasound but there are little data to support their use or evaluate their effectiveness in using POCUS. We designed a study to evaluate the image quality of an E-FAST Exam performed by Emergency Medicine Physician Assistant (EMPA) Fellows and Emergency Medicine (EM) Interns following identical training. Our hypothesis is that image quality obtained by EMPAs will be non-inferior to those images obtained by EM Interns. This is a prospective single-blinded study comparing the image quality of E-FAST exams performed by first year EM interns and first year EMPA fellows. All participants completed standard POCUS training prior to enrollment in the study. A total of 8 EMPAs and 8 EM first year residents completed 10 recorded E-FAST exams to be used as study images. Participants also viewed a 15-question slide show containing images of positive (6) and negative (9) E-FAST exams and recorded their interpretations. Images were reviewed by expert reviewers who were blinded to which images were collected by which group. An image quality score was recorded for each view as well as an overall image quality score. Image quality was rated on a 1 to 5 image quality scale. For overall image quality, the mean score for EMPAs was 3.6 ± 0.5 and for EM residents was 3.2 ± 0.5 with statistical significance favoring better image quality from the EMPAs. The time to completion for the EFAST exam for EMPAs was 4.8 ± 1.3 minutes and for interns it was 3.4 ± 1.4 minutes (P value = 0.02). There was no difference in image interpretation quiz scores between the groups (mean score 92% among interns and 95% among PAs). POCUS is an imaging modality which is very portable and relatively inexpensive which makes it ideal for military medicine. PAs are essential members of military trauma teams, and often run an initial trauma resuscitation. Being able to correctly identify patients who have free fluid early in the course of treatment allows for more correct evacuation criteria to ensure the sickest patients get to care the fastest. Although there are limited data to support POCUS use by non-physicians, our data support a growing body of evidence that it is not the profession or baseline medical education that determines an individual's ability to use and incorporate ultrasound into bedside and clinical practice. Our study shows that with training and experience PAs or other members of the military health care team can use the EFAST to better care for trauma patients.

Assessing public health service capability of primary healthcare personnel: a large-scale survey in Henan Province, China

BackgroundThe public health service capability of primary healthcare personnel directly affects the utilization and delivery of health services, and is influenced by various factors. This study aimed to examine the status, factors, and urban-rural differences of public health service capability among primary healthcare personnel, and provided suggestions for improvement.MethodsWe used cluster sampling to survey 11,925 primary healthcare personnel in 18 regions of Henan Province from 20th to March 31, 2023. Data encompassing demographics and public health service capabilities, including health lifestyle guidance, chronic disease management, health management of special populations, and vaccination services. Multivariable regression analysis was employed to investigate influencing factors. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) quantified urban-rural differences.ResultsThe total score of public health service capability was 80.17 points. Chronic disease management capability scored the lowest, only 19.60. Gender, education level, average monthly salary, professional title, health status, employment form, work unit type, category of practicing (assistant) physician significantly influenced the public health service capability (all P < 0.05). PSM analysis revealed rural primary healthcare personnel had higher public health service capability scores than urban ones.ConclusionsThe public health service capability of primary healthcare personnel in Henan Province was relatively high, but chronic disease management required improvement. Additionally, implementing effective training methods for different subgroups, and improving the service capability of primary medical and health institutions were positive measures.

A national postgraduate nurse practitioner and physician assistant fellowship in cystic fibrosis: An innovative approach to the provider shortage in complex and rare disease.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a complex life-limiting genetic condition that affects the respiratory, digestive, reproductive system, and sweat glands. Advances in treatment have led to improved survival and quality of life. Today, most persons with CF live to adulthood but require highly specialized care at accredited CF Care Centers. The growing and aging CF population combined with the provider workforce shortage have increased the demand for qualified CF providers. Nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) have been providing CF care for decades, but most learned on the job. The Leadership and Education for Advanced Practice Provider (LEAPP) fellowship in CF care aims to address the provider gap, ease transition to practice, and ensure access to specialized care. Unlike other institutional based joint NP/PA fellowships, LEAPP was designed to train providers at various locations across the national CF care center network. The program is innovative in several ways: (1) LEAPP employs a flipped classroom that pairs an online curriculum with case-based virtual discussion with content experts from the CF care network; (2) fellows receive mentored clinical training at their home CF center; (3) LEAPP partnered with a university-based team to ensure best practices and evaluation for adult learners; and (4) LEAPP promotes organizational enculturation through program components of professional mentoring, quality improvement, and leadership. This innovative approach may be suitable for other complex conditions that require highly specialized care, such as sickle cell disease, spina bifida, and solid organ transplant.

MRI use leading up to total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.

Demand for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is increasing as it remains the gold-standard treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the knee are not indicated for diagnosing knee OA and represent a possible delay to orthopaedic surgeon referral and unnecessary expenditure. The purpose of this study was to determine the proportion of patients who underwent an MRI in the two years prior to their primary TKA for OA and determine patient and physician associations with increased MRI usage. This is a population-based cohort study using administrative data from Ontario, Canada. All patients over 40years old who underwent their first primary TKA between April 1, 2008, and March 31, 2019, were included. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS and included the Cochran-Armitage test for trend of MRI prior to surgery. A predictive multivariable regression model was used to determine features correlated to receiving an MRI. There were 194,989 eligible first-time TKA recipients, of which 38,244 (19.6%) received an MRI in the two years prior to their surgery. The majority of these (69.6%) were ordered by primary care physicians. Patients who received an MRI were younger, had fewer comorbidities and were more affluent than patients who did not (p < 0.001). MRI use prior to TKA increased from 2008 to 2018 (p < 0.001). Despite MRIs rarely being indicated for the work-up of end-stage OA, nearly one in five patients have an MRI in the two years prior to their TKA. This may be increasing healthcare expenditure and surgical wait-times.

Methods and Variability in Physician Associate Student Advocacy Education

Methods and Variability in Physician Associate Student Advocacy Education

Perspective on the Journal of Physician Assistant Education: From Association Newsletter to Academic Peer-Reviewed Journal Celebrating 25 Years.

For 25 years, the Journal of PA Education (JPAE) and its predecessor publications have been the pre-eminent venues for disseminating and promulgating information and research on the physician assistant (PA) profession. In this article, former and current editors in chief have compiled a detailed history of the journal, its development, and its trajectory into the future, outlining the journey taken by Association of PA Programs/PA Education Association to catalog faculty scholarship through a peer-reviewed journal. Allowing for the referencing of articles and thus adding to the body of knowledge on PAs and PA education, JPAE has not only endured but thrived. This article speaks to the collective effort and excellence of staff, and the many volunteer reviewers, feature editors, and editorial board members who have nurtured JPAE along the way through numerous changes, challenges, and triumphs.

Five Evidence-Based Strategies to Foster a Culture of Well-Being in Physician Assistant Education.

The objective of this study was to discuss evidence-based strategies to promote a culture of well-being with physician assistant (PA) education. Published literature on medical student, resident, and PA student well-being was reviewed with findings subsequently categorized according to well-being strategy. Five themes were found from existing well-being research within medical student and PA student education: faculty role modeling and support, dedicated curricular time, pass/fail grading schema and de-emphasizing grades, peer support and learning communities, and evaluation importance. Physician assistant educators may be able to foster a culture of well-being for their students by making even small adjustments to the existing educational curriculum.

The Importance of Diversity in the Physician Assistant/Associate Workforce: Examining the Profession's Growth and Trends in Demographic Composition

ABSTRACT: Introduction: Healthcare workforce diversity is essential for increasing access and reducing racial/ethnic health disparities. We examined the growth and trends in physician assistant/associate (PA) workforce demographic composition by initial year of certification. Methods: Drawing on data from the National Commission on Certification of Physician Assistants, we aggregated gender, age (1975-2020), race/ethnicity, and underrepresented in medicine (URiM) (2000-2020). Descriptive statistics of demographics were calculated by the initial certification year and assessed for trends using the Cochran-Armitage test. Results: Analyses revealed an 11.7% annual growth rate in PAs earning initial certification and a change in gender composition (23.9% to 74.2% female) from 1975 to 2020. Between 2000 and 2020, we observed significant increases (all p&amp;lt;0.001) in the proportions of PAs who self-identify as Asian (5.7 percentage points), Hispanic/Latino(a) (3.5 percentage points), and multiracial (2.4 percentage points). However, there was a decline (all p&amp;lt;0.001) in the proportions of PAs who self-identify as Black/African American (1.2 percentage points), American Indian/Alaska Native (0.1 percentage points), Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (0.1 percentage points), and other race (1.1 percentage points). Trend analyses revealed that the proportion of PAs identifying as URiM decreased over the past 21 years. Conclusion: Ongoing assessment of the PA workforce demographics is essential to track the progress and effectiveness of diversification initiatives.

A cross‐sectional analysis of TikTok's most popular dermal filler videos

AbstractBackgroundDermal filler injections pose serious risks when administered by untrained individuals or when food and drug administration (FDA) guidelines are not adhered to. This issue may potentially be compounded by a growing reliance on social media platforms for health information.ObjectiveOur objective was to analyze the quality of health information in videos published on dermal filler on TikTok.MethodsWe searched three hashtags, #filler (2.4 billion views), #dermalfiller (132.8 million views), and #fillersinjection (137.0 million views) and assessed the top videos returned by TikTok's algorithm that met inclusion criteria. The quality of health information was evaluated using the DISCERN instrument, a validated tool that uses a 1 to 5 scale to assess consumer health information.ResultsVideos received a mean DISCERN score of 1.64 (SD 0.33), indicating significantly low quality. 7% of the videos promoted non‐FDA‐approved uses of filler. Notably, videos posted by physician assistants or physicians received the highest mean scores (1.92 and 1.72) as well as videos categorized as educational (1.99).ConclusionDermatologists should be aware of the high viewership of low‐quality TikTok videos on dermal filler. Dermatologists shall, therefore, understand the importance of their role in providing education to patients on this topic.

Achieving Equity in EMS Care and Patient Outcomes through Quality Management Systems: A Position Statement

ABSTRACT Improving health and safety in our communities requires deliberate focus and commitment to equity. Inequities are differences in access, treatment, and outcomes between individuals and across populations that are systemic, avoidable, and unjust. Within health care in general, and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) in particular, there are demonstrated inequities in the quality of care provided to patients based on a number of characteristics linked to discrimination, exclusion, or bias. Given the critical role that EMS plays within the health care system, it is imperative that EMS systems reduce inequities by delivering evidence-based, high-quality care for the communities and patients we serve. To achieve equity in EMS care delivery and patient outcomes, the National Association of EMS Physicians recommends that EMS systems and agencies: make health equity a strategic priority and commit to improving equity at all levels. assess and monitor clinical and safety quality measures through the lens of inequities as an integrated part of the quality management process. ensure that data elements are structured to enable equity analysis at every level and routinely evaluate data for limitations hindering equity analysis and improvement. involve patients and community stakeholders in determining data ownership and stewardship to ensure its ongoing evolution and fitness for use for measuring care inequities. address biases as they translate into the quality of care and standards of respect for patients. pursue equity through a framework rooted in the principles of improvement science.

Care of The Older Fighter: Position Statement of the Association of Ringside Physicians

ABSTRACT Older Fighters are defined as combat sports athletes older than 35 years, based on heightened medical risks and historical classification. Age-related changes to the neurological, cardiopulmonary, endocrinological, thermoregulatory, osmoregulatory, and musculoskeletal systems increase these athletes’ risks for injury and may prolong their recovery. These age-related risks warrant special considerations for competition, licensure, prefight medical clearance, in-fight supervision, post-fight examination, and counseling regarding training practices and retirement from combat sports. Neurological considerations include increased risk of intracranial lesions, intracranial hemorrhage, and sequelae from traumatic brain injury (TBI), warranting more comprehensive neurological evaluation and neuroimaging. Increased risk of myocardial ischemia and infarction warrant careful assessment of cardiac risk factors and scrutiny of cardiovascular fitness. Older fighters may take longer time to recover from musculoskeletal injury; post-injury clearance should be individualized.

In Case You Haven't Heard…

Can pharmacists help ease the mental health workforce shortage? Pharmacists are not new to health care, but Ray Love, psychiatric pharmacist and past president of the College of Psychiatric and Neurologic Pharmacists, says they're underutilized, according to an article published in the April 23 issue of #CrisisTalk. “Within pharmacy, we can serve a whole array of clinical roles in patient care settings,” he said. As behavioral healthcare demands increase and the workforce continues to plummet, Love believes psychiatric pharmacists can help address these shortages, the article stated. In recent years, the pandemic has pushed community pharmacists into the spotlight, with those working at retail pharmacies like Walgreens and CVS administering vaccines and long‐acting injectables like antipsychotic medications and naltrexone for substance use disorders. “Community pharmacists were the unsung heroes of Covid — they did all the vaccinations in assisted living and nursing homes and then administered them in the community,” he said. The National Center for Health Workforce Analysis at the Health and Human Services Department has projected that by 2036, there will be shortages throughout the behavioral health workforce, including addiction counselors, psychiatrists, psychologists, social workers, school counselors and psychiatric physician assistants. As workforce shortages rise, Love believes psychiatric pharmacists can help. “We're skilled in behavioral health medications and are complementary team members,” he said.

Federal Impacts on Buprenorphine Prescribing in Washington State, 2012 to 2022.

Objectives. To evaluate changes in monthly buprenorphine dispensation associated with federal prescribing policies in Washington State from 2012 to 2022. Methods. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis comparing monthly buprenorphine prescriptions dispensed per 1000 population after the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act (CARA), Substance Use-Disorder Prevention That Promotes Opioid Recovery and Treatment for Patients and Communities Act (SUPPORT), and new prescribing rules during the COVID-19 pandemic. Buprenorphine formulated for opioid use disorder was included from the Washington State Prescription Monitoring Program. A log-linear autoregressive model measured linear trend changes. Results. Physician prescribing increased by 1.63% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.41%, 1.85%) per month after CARA with sustained declines after SUPPORT. Nurse practitioner (NP) prescribing increased by 19.48% (95% CI = 18.8%, 20.16%) per month after CARA with physician assistants (PAs) showing similar trends. Following the implementation of SUPPORT, NP and PA trends continued to increase at a reduced growth rate of 3.96% (95% CI = 2.01%, 5.94%) and 1.87% (95% CI = 0.56%, 3.19%), respectively. No prescribers experienced increases during the COVID-19 pandemic. Conclusions. CARA nearly tripled the buprenorphine prescribing rate. The SUPPORT Act initiated sustained declines for physician prescribing, and the COVID-19 period reversed gains for PAs and NPs. The current opioid crisis requires expanded efforts in Washington State. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print May 2, 2024:e1-e9. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307649).

Abstract PO5-10-04: Rare to Care: Assessing Awareness and Health Disparity Factors Related to Inflammatory Breast Cancer in the Primary Care Setting

Abstract Background: The diagnosis of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is life-changing as it is a rare, highly aggressive breast cancer variant designated by NIH as a cancer health disparity. Given the unique presentation of diffuse tumor cell spread in the absence of a solid mass, which is not easily detected by self-breast exams or mammograms, IBC patients often face delays in diagnosis and treatment. Therefore, an individualized and a multifaceted approach that addresses the unique needs of the patient with input from both providers and the community is an unmet need. To address this, we are investigating the current knowledge and perspectives of providers and public related to rare cancers like IBC in primary care practices. Methods: Researchers and advanced practice providers collaboratively drafted and piloted the initial surveys with guidance from a Community Advisory Board, comprising of members from academic institutions, primary care practices in urban and rural setting, topical experts, and patient advocates, in order to assess primary care providers (PCPs) and general public knowledge, attitudes and health seeking practices related to rare cancer like IBC. Results: The surveys are currently being administered statewide specific to PCPs or public via cognitive interviews and/or using an online survey tool within North Carolina as a model of a large state (100 counties) with a range of population densities, race, ethnicities, and environmental burdens. Challenges elaborated at the PCP level include communicating rare cancer information, gaps in confidence in diagnosing IBC, timely follow-up with patients, and accessing specialty care and an unmet need for developing PCP educational modules to improve guideline-concordant care. Public data analyzed to date is from a Duke Outpatient Clinic, an urban ambulatory care teaching practice serving primarily low-income, medically complex patients in Durham (n=14) included 69% Black, 93% female, with 68% in households earning under $50,000 annually). 71% had not heard of IBC; 64% did not identify high BMI as a risk factor; 36% did not know there is differential race-related incidence; 74% did not recognize IBC-specific symptoms. 50% noted lack of insurance, transportation, religious reasons, or difficulty or fear of talking to a physician contributed in general delay in seeking health care. Most importantly, 93% expressed feeling comfortable sharing information about IBC with others. Majority expressed that adding visual aids and providing educational materials about IBC at the time of survey would be helpful. Conclusions: The results highlight the role of PCPs, including physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners, who are often the first point of contact when patients begin to notice signs or symptoms. The general public and the patients with common breast cancer subtypes can provide valuable insight into their own health care experiences, what works for them and what barriers they face in their communities, which can be used to compare with experience of patients with IBC and other rare cancers. Overall, the lessons from this study inform the development of effective tools to educate PCPs and patients for this understudied cancer that contributes to disparities in clinical and survival outcomes in minoritized and marginalized populations. Support in part from the Duke Cancer Institute pilot as part of the P30 Cancer Center Support Grant (P30CA014236) and Duke School of Medicine Behavioral Health and Survey Research Core Facility Award (GRD, ANT); Duke Advanced Practice Provider Leadership Institute scholarship (VK, GRD), Department of Surgery (GRD); Duke Ahead Education grant; NIH/NCI RO1CA264529-01 (GRD); ACS Mission Boost grant MBG-20-141-01-MBG (GRD), Nakayama Public Service Scholar Award (AB). Citation Format: Gayathri R Devi, Lawrence Greenblatt, Rashmi Saincher, Valerie Keck, Beau Blass, Sarah Weaver, Alexandra Bennion, Anh Tran. Rare to Care: Assessing Awareness and Health Disparity Factors Related to Inflammatory Breast Cancer in the Primary Care Setting [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO5-10-04.

Abstract PO1-10-06: Understanding clinical meaningfulness in metastatic breast cancer treatment decision-making: experiences and perspectives of patients, caregivers, and clinicians

Abstract Background: While many clinical and non-clinical factors inform metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treatment recommendations; patient preferences, values, and care goals also influence how treatment options are weighed, deliberated, and decided upon. Additionally, in the mBC care setting, clinical meaningfulness and clinically meaningful outcomes (e.g., survival, quality-of-life) are important factors to consider along the care continuum. However, the extent to which patients and their oncology care team align on the interpretation and use of these concepts during treatment decision-making has not been well elucidated. This study examined perspectives on the concepts of (i) clinical meaningfulness and (ii) clinically meaningful outcomes associated with mBC treatment among five key stakeholder groups: patients, caregivers, oncologists, advanced practice providers (APPs), and oncology nurses. Methods: Qualitative semi-structured in-person and web-based focus groups were conducted between March and June 2023 among: (i) people living with mBC; (ii) unpaid or informal caregivers to people with mBC; and providers involved in the care of patients with mBC, including (iii) oncologists, (iv) APPs (i.e., physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and (v) oncology nurses. Discussion guides were developed to elicit stakeholder perspectives on clinical meaningfulness and clinically meaningful outcomes to help identify areas of convergence and divergence between and within stakeholder groups. All discussions were audio recorded and transcribed. The constant comparative approach was used to identify key themes. Results: Twenty-two focus groups were conducted with 50 patients, 24 caregivers, 8 oncologists, 13 APPs, and 17 oncology nurses. Overall, patients and caregivers were unfamiliar with the concepts of clinical meaningfulness and clinically meaningful outcomes, underscoring the critical need for using accessible and patient-friendly terminology in treatment decision-making discussions. While some providers were familiar with these concepts, they reported not using these terms when discussing treatment recommendations with patients. Although some provider participants thought clinical meaningfulness described quantitative endpoints (e.g., additional months of survival), participants across all stakeholder groups described patients’ abilities to achieve life goals (e.g., participation in milestone events and social activities, ability to travel) as paramount. Recommendations for improving treatment decision-making discussions included taking a patient-centered approach, with inclusive, dynamic patient-provider discussions and continuous evaluation of patient priorities across the care continuum, not just at diagnosis. Meaningful outcomes beyond overall survival need to be considered, including quality of life, progression-free survival, minimal or manageable side effects, and improvement in symptom burden and functioning. Across all stakeholders, participants stressed that outcomes considered meaningful are highly individualized and dynamic, evolving over time as patients move through the treatment journey and life stages. Conclusions: Clinical meaningfulness is poorly understood and not often considered in the clinical setting when making mBC treatment decisions, highlighting a need for accessible and patient-friendly terminology in mBC treatment decision-making conversations. While participants valued overall survival, the importance of meaningful outcomes that support patients’ quality of life was emphasized. Study findings can be used to inform both practice and clinical research to better capture meaningful outcomes for patients. Citation Format: Stephanie Graff, Emily Freeman, Meaghan Roach, Rozanne Wilson, Ricki Fairley, Mary Gullatte, Jeanne Stemland, Becky Chan, Paulina Wochal, Julie Katz, Suepattra May-Slater. Understanding clinical meaningfulness in metastatic breast cancer treatment decision-making: experiences and perspectives of patients, caregivers, and clinicians [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-10-06.

Abstract PO1-11-10: Use of a standardized tool for the evaluation and treatment of cancer related cognitive impairment (chemo-brain) among breast cancer patients

Abstract There is a steep linear increase in patients surviving a cancer diagnosis. Clinical solutions that address the high prevalence of cancer-related treatment effects (CRTE) are urgently needed. A stark example of this need is the dearth of screening and treatment programs for cancer related cognitive impairment (CRCI) (colloquially called “chemo-brain”). Up to 75% of cancer patients report neurocognitive changes that leave patients unable to cope with the expectations of employers, colleagues, families, and friends. The prevalence of neurological disorders is 275% higher among adult cancer patients, when compared to an adult cancer-free population. For many adolescent and young adult cancer patients, the onset of CRCI occurs during "cognitive prime time"; a time when individuals are pursuing education, careers, and raising families. To address a gap in CRTE we have implemented a virtual multi-disciplinary intervention to measure and treat CRCI. Our CRCI intervention follows National Comprehensive Cancer Network and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines for CRCI. These guidelines indicate a multi-disciplinary approach with emphasis on increasing physical activity levels, cognitive-behavioral therapy, memory adaptive training, mood management, and sleep optimization. Our approach also follows recent ASCO guidelines for nutrition counseling. Our CRCI program utilizes medical oncologists, physician assistants, mental health therapists, registered dietitians, and occupational therapists. A nationally validated patient reported outcome (PRO) measurement, analysis, and reporting platform informs clinical treatment pathways, monitors patient progress, guides clinical decision making, and improves patient/provider communication. Using health status measures for CRCI, and following American Cancer Society and ASCO guidelines, patients are risk-stratified into three personalized cancer survivor care pathways: 1) low-complexity patients; 2) medium-complexity patients; and 3) high-complexity patients. Low-complexity patients baseline PROs score in the normal range, medium-complexity patients are those who score below the norm (moderate to large effect size difference from normal), and high-complexity patients are those who score well below the norm (greater than larger effect size difference from normal). Low-complexity patients are enrolled into a self-management and continuation of care program. Medium-complexity patients are enrolled into a shared care program. High-complexity patients are enrolled into an acute care program. All three clinical pathways include continued risk-factor vital-sign surveillance. Nearly 100% (99%) of patients who enroll in our primary cancer survivor care program complete our PRO baseline (N=80). From a convenient sample of breast cancer patients (N=42), provisional results of patient-specific segmentation analyses reveal a nearly perfect bell-shaped curve, with 51% of the population classified within the definition of medium-complexity and even split of outliers (high-complexity 24% and low-complexity 24%). Additionally, of all patients in our primary cancer survivor care program who completed at least three measurement time points for health status measures of cognitive impartment (N=38), 92% had a positive experience, 71% had a clinically significant improvement in cognitive health, 21% had a no change in cognitive status, and only 8% had a decline in cognitive health. If these data, and PRO implementation approach hold true, this program could be scaled to national and international cancer survivor population suffering from CRCI. Citation Format: John Librett, Mark Kosinski, Gregory Litton. Use of a standardized tool for the evaluation and treatment of cancer related cognitive impairment (chemo-brain) among breast cancer patients [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO1-11-10.

Risk Factors of Intraoperative Pressure Injury in Adult Patients Undergoing Neurologic Surgery.

To present research investigating the incidence of and risk factors associated with intraoperative pressure injury in patients undergoing neurologic surgery at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University in China. This continuing education activity is intended for physicians, physician assistants, nurse practitioners, and registered nurses with an interest in skin and wound care. After participating in this educational activity, the participant will:1. Identify the incidence of intraoperative pressure injuries (PIs) in patients undergoing neurologic surgery at Xiangya Hospital, Central South University in China.2. Describe risk factors for intraoperative PI.3. Outline strategies to help mitigate intraoperative PI risk.

Professional Voice Care: A Team Approach

Abstract: Traditionally, doctors in most specialties work in relative isolation, frequently caring for patients alone or with just a nurse. State-of-the-art care for voice disorders involves a multidisciplinary model that has evolved since the 1980s. Optimal care includes not only a laryngologist who specializes in voice, but also a skilled speech-language pathologist, singing voice specialist, nurse clinician and/or an extended care provider such as a nurse practitioner or physician assistant; and arts medicine specialists in numerous other disciplines including pulmonology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, psychology, psychiatry and many other fields. Voice problems in singers are diagnosed and resolved most efficiently in an integrated team setting.

An innovative clinical interprofessional education experience to advance knowledge and skill in communication with aphasic patients: A randomized controlled pilot study

BackgroundBecause of its impact on communication, aphasia increases patients’ risk for poor healthcare outcomes. Healthcare teams should be equipped to effectively serve this population. PurposeThe primary aim was to pilot the effectiveness of an aphasia communicationpartner training program for healthcare students by examining changes in knowledge and behavior. A secondary aim assessed learners’ understanding of other healthcare professionals’ roles and responsibilities. MethodStudents in pharmacy, physician assistant, and occupational therapy were randomly assigned to experimental or control groups. The former participated in didactic training with speech-language pathology students and mentored interactions with aphasic patients. Both groups completed pre-/post-training knowledge assessments and participated in semi-structured patient interactions. DiscussionThe clinical IPE experience resulted in statistically significant differences in aphasia knowledge and associated behaviors. Additionally, learners’ understanding of healthcare professions improved. ConclusionsClinical IPE experiences are effective at improving clinical communication skills and increasing knowledge of language-impaired populations.

Building Interprofessional Competency Through A Virtual Cardiopulmonary Case Collaboration

Introduction Interprofessional education (IPE) experiences are prioritized as a key component of physician assistant (PA) and Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) education programs’ curricula to reflect contemporary practice. Virtual IPE is reported to facilitate clinical decision making and teamwork in students. However, limited studies exist on its effectiveness to promote the IPE Collaborative's (IPEC) core competencies. As we aim to increase IPE in our curriculum, virtual IPE offers several advantages. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a case-based, virtual IPE improved students' knowledge and attitudes of collaborative team skills using the Interprofessional Collaborative Competencies Attainment Scale (ICCAS). Methods This study used a retrospective pretest-posttest design. Students in first-year PA and DPT programs (n = 130, PA = 48, DPT = 82) completed the ICCAS survey before and after attendance of a mandatory virtual IPE event. The virtual IPE session centered on designing a collaborative plan of care for an individual with congestive heart failure in an outpatient setting. To assess skill attainment, students completed the ICCAS survey. t Tests with Bonferroni's correction (P &lt; .01) were conducted for analyses. Results One hundred twenty-two students (PA = 46, DPT = 76) provided complete survey data. Statistically significant improvement was noted for all 20 questions (P &lt; .001). Large pre/post-IPE event effect sizes were observed for all 20 statements in the ICCAS. No statistically significant differences between the 2 disciplines were noted. Discussion Our findings suggest that a virtual case-based IPE experience may offer benefits to improve the student's attitude and knowledge related to IPEC during the initial year of PA and DPT programs. These data are encouraging as integration of virtual IPE experiences may affect teamwork competencies in healthcare programs.