Physical Examination-indicated Cerclage Research Articles

The association between the degree of cervical dilatation before ultrasound and physical examination indicated cerclage and subsequent neonatal outcomes.

Preterm identification of cervical dilation in pregnant women leads to the application of emergency cervical cerclage with an expectation of achieving term delivery. However, this is not always feasible. Short- and long-term neonatal complications post-preterm birth pose a significant challenge. It is crucial to anticipate potential complications and understand the possibilities of postpartum development as they can be encountered. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the degree of cervical dilatation before ultrasound and physical examination-indicated cerclage in singleton pregnancies presenting with premature cervical dilatation with bulging fetal membranes (rescue cerclage) on subsequent neonatal outcomes. In this retrospective clinical study, over a 10-year period between January 2009 and January 2019, 72 singleton pregnancies undergoing rescue cerclage were included and divided into two groups according to pre-cerclage cervical dilatation: Group 1 (n = 33) and Group 2 (n= 39) with cervical dilatation ≤3 cm and >3 cm, respectively. Latency period for pregnancy prolongation, gestational age at delivery, birth weight, and neonatal morbidity and mortality were compared across the groups. Logistic regression was used to delineate the independent effect of cervical dilatation at cerclage placement on neonatal mortality. Group 2 had a higher delivery rate at ≤28 weeks' gestation (p = 0.007) and lower birth weight (p = 0.002) compared to Group 1, with an increased mean latency period in Group 2 (90 ± 55 days versus 52 ± 54 days, p = 0.005). The newborn intensive care unit (NICU) requirement, respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), neonatal jaundice and sepsis, and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) were more frequent in Group 2. Neonatal mortality rate was higher (52.6% versus 24.2%, p = 0.015) and intact survival was lower (23.1% versus 48.4%, p = 0.013) in Group 2, whereas rates of cerebral palsy (8% and 9%, respectively) were similar between the groups (p = 0.64). Advanced cervical dilatation (>3 cm) during physical examination-indicated cerclage in singleton pregnancies is associated with earlier delivery, leading to increased neonatal morbidity and mortality when compared with pregnancies having lesser degrees of cervical dilatation at cerclage. However, short-term poor neurological outcomes seem comparable.

Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclage in Singleton and Twin Pregnancies and Risk Factors for Predicting Preterm Birth < 28 Weeks.

We compare the outcomes of physical examination-indicated cerclage (PEIC) between singleton and twin pregnancies and analyze predictive factors for preterm birth < 28 weeks of gestation. Patients who underwent PEIC at our center were reviewed. We compared perinatal outcomes between singleton and twin pregnancies. The primary outcome was delivery before 28 weeks of gestation. Also, we analyzed perioperative clinical, laboratory, and sonographic findings to determine the risk factors for predicting preterm birth < 28 weeks. The rate of preterm birth < 28 weeks was not significantly different. Also, neonatal outcomes were not different. Also, we compared the outcomes according to GA (gestational age) at delivery before (Group A) or after (Group B) 28 weeks, which is the primary outcome. In perioperative findings, group A was likely to have more advanced cervical dilatation, bulging membranes into the vagina, positive fFN or IGFBP-1, and shorter postoperative CL (cervical length) than group B. Also, positive fFN or IGFBP-1 and postoperative CL < 21.6 mm were independently associated with a higher risk of preterm birth < 28 weeks. These findings provide the effectiveness of PEIC with twin pregnancy as well as singleton pregnancy and helpful predictive methods that might effectively identify women at high risk of preterm birth < 28 weeks following PEIC.

Outcomes of Ultrasound or Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclage according to the Degree of Cervical Dilation.

Pregnancy outcomes of individuals receiving cervical cerclage when the cervix is dilated are not well known. We sought to examine preterm birth rates after ultrasound or physical examination-indicated cerclage placement according to the degree of cervical dilation. This was a retrospective cohort study of individuals with singleton pregnancies undergoing ultrasound or physical examination-indicated cerclage before 240/7 weeks of gestation from 2004 to 2018. Individuals were categorized based on the degree of cervical dilation at the time of cerclage. Our primary outcome was preterm delivery at less than 37 weeks of gestation. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95th confidence intervals (95% CI), controlling for predefined covariates. Of 147 individuals undergoing ultrasound or physical examination-indicated cerclage, 90/147 (61%) had a closed or 0.5 cm dilated cervix at the time of cerclage placement, 45/147 (31%) had a cervical dilation of 1 to 2.5 cm, and 12/147 (8%) had a cervical dilation of 3 to 4 cm at the time of placement. Individuals with a cervical dilation of 1 to 2.5 cm compared with those who had a closed cervix did not have increased odds of preterm delivery (58 vs. 42%; aOR: 1.95; 95% CI: 0.93-4.07). However, individuals with a cervical dilation of 3 to 4 cm compared with individuals who had a closed cervix had significantly increased odds of preterm delivery (75 vs. 42%; aOR: 4.33; 95% CI: 1.05-17.77). The rate of preterm birth increases with increasing cervical dilation at the time of cerclage placement. However, individuals who have a cerclage placed when the cervix is 1 to 2.5 cm can achieve an outcome that is not significantly different from those who had a cerclage placed when the cervix is closed. · Time from cerclage placement to delivery decreases as cervical dilation increases.. · Individuals 1 to 2.5 cm dilated at the time of cerclage can achieve a favorable outcome.. · A cervical dilation of ≥3 cm at cerclage placement was associated with extreme prematurity..

Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies

Objective The aim of this study was to compare pregnancy outcomes of physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin and singleton pregnancies with bulging membranes. Methods All women with bulging membranes in the second trimester of pregnancy who were admitted to La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital from January 2009 to January 2022 were included. A total of 128 participants were enrolled, 102 singleton pregnancies and 26 twin pregnancies. All patients underwent an amniocentesis to rule out intra-amniotic inflammation (IL-6 < 2.6 ng/mL). Cerclage was placed in the absence of intra-amniotic inflammation. Results Compared with singleton gestations, twin pregnancies displayed a significantly higher prevalence of nulliparity and assisted reproductive techniques. The incidence of intra-amniotic inflammation/infection was similar in both groups (68.62% in singleton vs. 65.38% in twin pregnancies). The average gestational age of delivery without cerclage in singleton gestations was 23.83 weeks (95% CI 22.82–24.84) and in twin pregnancies, it was 23.69 weeks (95% CI 21.8–25.57). The average gestational age at delivery among patients with cerclage was 37.27 weeks (95% CI 35.35–39.19) in singleton gestations and 36 weeks (95% CI 33.51–38.63) in twin pregnancies, with no significant differences. Time from diagnosis to delivery in patients with IL-6 < 2.6 ng/mL was 79.88 days, and in those with IL > 2.6 ng/mL was 10.87 days. Gestational age at delivery was significantly higher in both singleton and twin pregnancies with cerclage, compared with those without cerclage (log-rank p < .001). Conclusions Singleton and twin pregnancies with bulging membranes behave similarly when cerclage is placed in the absence of intraamniotic inflammation/infection.

Multimodal Management of Cervical Insufficiency Complicated by Intra-amniotic Candida albicans Infection.

Bacteria are the most common pathogens implicated in ascending infections in patients with cervical insufficiency. However, Candida albicans is a rare and serious cause of intra-amniotic infection that should be considered on the differential diagnosis. Upon diagnosis following cerclage placement, patients are generally advised to undergo immediate cerclage removal and discontinuation of the pregnancy due to the high risk of maternal and fetal morbidity. However, some patients decline and instead elect to continue the pregnancy with or without treatment. Limited data exist to guide management of these high-risk patients. We describe a case of previable intra-amniotic C. albicans infection diagnosed following physical examination-indicated cerclage placement. The patient declined pregnancy termination and subsequently underwent systemic antifungal therapy as well as serial intra-amniotic fluconazole instillations. Fetal blood sampling confirmed transplacental transfer of maternal systemic antifungal therapy. The fetus delivered preterm and without evidence of fungemia, despite persistently positive amniotic fluid cultures. In a well-counseled patient with culture-proven intra-amniotic C. albicans infection declining termination of pregnancy, multimodal antifungal therapy in the form of systemic and intra-amniotic fluconazole administration may prevent subsequent fetal or neonatal fungemia and improve postnatal outcomes. · Candida is an uncommon cause of intra-amniotic infection in the setting of cervical insufficiency.. · Multimodal antifungal therapy may prevent fetal fungemia related to intra-amniotic Candida infection.. · Fetal blood sampling confirmed transplacental passage of fluconazole after maternal administration..

Effects of Amnioreduction before Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclage on Pregnancy Outcomes: A Propensity Score Matched Study

This study investigated the effects of amnioreduction before physical examination-indicated cerclage on pregnancy outcomes using a propensity score matching analysis. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included women who underwent cerclage operations due to painless cervical dilation in the second trimester (14-28 weeks). The primary outcome was the time from operation until delivery. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth rate and neonatal outcomes. Primary and secondary outcomes were compared between those with amnioreduction and those without amnioreduction. Of 103 women, 31 received preoperative amnioreduction (amnioreduction group) and 72 women did not (no-amnioreduction group). Since there were differences in baseline characteristics and preoperative ultrasound findings between the two groups, we matched 25 women with amnioreduction and 25 women without amnioreduction using a propensity score. In the matched cohort, the amnioreduction group showed a shorter time from operation to delivery than the group without amnioreduction and the hazard ratio of amnioreduction was 2.5 (95% confidence interval; 1.4-4.7). In addition, the preterm birth rate before 28 weeks of gestation and the neonatal composite outcome were higher in the amnioreduction group than that in the group without amnioreduction. Amnioreduction before physical examination-indicated cerclage was associated with poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Therefore, careful consideration is required when performing amnioreduction before cerclage operation.

Residency Experience With Physical Examination- and Ultrasound-Indicated Cerclage: A Single Center Retrospective Study.

Background: Cervical insufficiency, the dilation of the cervix in the absence of contractions or labor, can cause second-trimester pregnancy loss or preterm birth. Cervical cerclage is a common treatment for cervical insufficiency and has 3 indications for placement: history, physical examination, and ultrasound. The purpose of this study was to compare pregnancy and birth outcomes for physical examination- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational descriptive review of second-trimester obstetric patients with transcervical cerclage performed by residents at a single tertiary care medical center from January 1, 2006, to January 1, 2020. We present data on all patients and compare outcomes between the 2 study groups: patients who received physical examination-indicated cerclage vs those who received ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Results: Cervical cerclage was placed on 43 patients at a mean gestational age of 20.4 ± 2.4 weeks (range, 14 to 25 weeks) and with a mean cervical length of 1.53 ± 0.5 cm (range, 0.4 to 2.5 cm). With a latency period of 11.8 ± 5.7 weeks, mean gestational age at delivery was 32.1 ± 6.2 weeks. Fetal/neonatal survival rates were comparable: 80% (16/20) for the physical examination group compared to 82.6% (19/23) for the ultrasound group. No differences were found between groups for gestational age at delivery-31.5 ± 6.8 in the physical examination group vs 32.6 ± 5.8 in the ultrasound group (P=0.581)-or for preterm birth <37 weeks-65.0% (13/20) in the physical examination group vs 65.2% (15/23) in the ultrasound group (P=1.000). Rates of maternal morbidity and neonatal intensive care unit morbidity were similar between the groups. No cases of immediate operative complications or maternal deaths occurred. Conclusion: Pregnancy outcomes for physical examination- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage placed by residents at a tertiary academic medical center were similar. Fetal/neonatal survival and preterm birth rates were favorable for physical examination-indicated cerclage when compared to other published studies.

Screening and prevention of preterm birth in twin pregnancies.

Preterm birth (PTB) is commonest cause of perinatal mortality and morbidity in multiple pregnancies with significant long-term sequelae. The etiology of PTB is multifactorial. Universal screening by a transvaginal assessment of cervical length (CL) at midtrimester scan is recommended for all women with twin pregnancies. Women with CL≤25mm should be offered prophylactic vaginal progesterone to mitigate the risk of PTB. Other modalities like home uterine activity monitoring, digital cervical examination, fetal fibronectin (FFN) assessment, and screening for infections are not recommended. History-indicated cerclage is not advised in unselected twin pregnancies, but a combination of physical examination-indicated cerclage, tocolytics, and antibiotics may be considered in twin pregnancies with a dilated cervix prior to 24 weeks' gestation. Routine use of cervical pessary is not advised and should be limited to research settings. Neither transvaginal CL nor FFN assessment is supported by evidence to predict the risk of PTB in symptomatic women with multiple pregnancies. More research is warranted to develop and validate algorithms to predict PTB to provide individualized care to these high-risk pregnancies.

Cervical cerclage in twin pregnancies: obstetric and neonatal outcomes.

Although there have been significant improvements in prenatal and neonatal care in recent years, twin pregnancies account for 17-20% of all preterm births and are associated with an increased risk of perinatal mortality and morbidity. To evaluate the contribution of cerclage to the continuation of pregnancy in twin pregnancy cases required cervical cerclage. Cases of twin pregnancies who performed cervical cerclage with follow-up and deliveries between January 2010 and January 2022 in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ege University Faculty of Medicine Hospital, were retrospectively analyzed. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. A total of 23 women who performed cervical cerclage due to cervical insufficiency in twin pregnancies were evaluated retrospectively. The mean time between cerclage placement and delivery was 12.1 ± 7weeks, maximum prolongation was in the obstetric history-indicated cerclage group. The gestational age at delivery was 20-38 (median 30) weeks. The rate of spontaneous preterm birth at < 34, < 32, < 28, and < 24weeks was higher in the physical examination-indicated cerclage group. Overall neonatal survival was 82.5% (n = 33/40). The time between cerclage placement and birth were considered as an important gain for twin pregnancies at the limit of viability. Further studies are needed to better understand the role of cervical cerclage in preventing premature birth and to determine the indications for cerclage.

Adjunct Therapy at Time of Examination-Indicated Cervical Cerclage in Singleton Pregnancies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Physical examination-indicated cerclage for cervical insufficiency prolongs gestation, but evidence on the addition of adjuncts to further prolong latency is limited. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare gestational latency between those who did and did not receive adjunct antibiotic or tocolytic therapy at the time of examination-indicated cerclage. Electronic databases (1966-2020) were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing adjunct antibiotic or tocolytic use versus nonuse at time of examination-indicated cerclage, defined as placement for cervical dilation ≥1 cm, in a current singleton pregnancy. Studies including individuals with intra-amniotic infection, cerclage in place, nonviable gestation, or ruptured membranes were excluded. The primary outcome was latency from cerclage placement to delivery. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth, preterm premature rupture of membranes, birth weight, and neonatal survival. Risk of bias was assessed using standardized tools. Heterogeneity was assessed using χ 2 and I 2 tests. Results were pooled and analyzed using a random-effects model. This study is registered with The International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with registration no.: CRD42021216370. Of 923 unique records, 163 were reviewed in full. Three met inclusion criteria: one RCT and two retrospective cohorts. The included RCT (n = 50) and one cohort (n = 142) compared outcomes with and without adjunct use of antibiotic and tocolytic, while the second cohort (n = 150) compared outcomes with and without adjunct tocolytic, with a subpopulation also receiving antibiotics. The RCT was nested within one of the cohorts, and therefore only one of these two studies was utilized for any given outcome to eliminate counting individuals twice. Risk of bias was "critical" for one cohort study, "moderate" for the other cohort study, and "some concerns" for the RCT. Gestational latency could not be pooled and meta-analyzed. Adjunct tocolytic-antibiotic therapy was not associated with a decrease in risk of preterm delivery <28 weeks (relative risk [RR] = 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65-1.26; χ 2 = 0.0, I 2 = 0.0%) or neonatal survival to discharge (RR = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.91-1.35; χ 2 = 0.05, I 2 = 0.0%). There is not enough evidence to robustly evaluate the use of adjunct tocolytics or antibiotics at time of examination-indicated cerclage to prolong latency. · Limited data on adjunct antibiotic tocolytics at cerclage.. · Widely variable practices at time of cerclage identified.. · Role of adjunct therapies at time of examination-indicated cerclage remains unclear..

Outcomes following Placement and Removal of Transvaginal Cerclage in at Risk Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience.

Objective The objective of this study was to estimate the time between removal of cerclage and delivery, stratified by indication for cerclage placement (elective or non-elective). Additionally, delivery within 72 hours after cerclage removal was compared between elective and non-elective cerclage placement, as well as between ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage placement. Design A single-center retrospective cohort study. Participants/Materials, Setting, and Methods. Clinical information of 72 pregnant women who underwent transvaginal cerclage over a 4-year period was obtained. Comparisons were made between elective (history-indicated) and non-elective (ultrasound or physical examination-indicated) cerclage placement. Comparisons were also made between physical examination-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage. Results Compared to those who had a non-elective cerclage, women undergoing elective cerclage were more likely to have history of cervical treatment (44% vs. 15%, p = 0.02), and spontaneous preterm delivery (92% vs. 61%, p = 0.003). There was no difference in the rate of delivery ≤72 hours following cerclage removal between women who had elective cerclage and those who had non-elective cerclage (46% vs. 58%, p = 0.47). Women who had an elective cerclage were more likely to have elective cerclage removal ≥36 weeks (71.8% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.01), compared to those who had undergone non-elective cerclage. The rate of delivery ≤72 hours following removal of cerclage was greater in women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage compared to women who had ultrasound-indicated cerclage (80% vs. 39%, p = 0.04). Among women who had an elective cerclage, there was no difference in the rate of delivery at ≤72 hours between those who had elective cerclage removal at 36 weeks compared to those electively removed at 37 weeks (31% vs. 58%, p = 0.30). No complications such as fetal demise, iatrogenic amniotic membrane rupture, hemorrhage, or cervical laceration were reported within this cohort. Conclusion Cerclage indication should be considered prior to scheduling elective cerclage removal. Women who had an elective cerclage are most likely to get it electively removed at 36 weeks compared to their counterparts who had a non-elective cerclage. Furthermore, women who had a physical examination-indicated cerclage are most likely to deliver within 72 hours of cerclage removal.

Effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated and physical examination-indicated cerclage: a retrospective study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness and perinatal outcomes of cerclage procedure according to indication.MethodsThe pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of the patients who underwent cerclage with the diagnosis of cervical insufficiency between January 2016 and December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were categorized into three groups: a history-indicated group, an ultrasound-indicated group and a physical examination-indicated group.ResultsSeventy-three patients who underwent cerclage were included in the study. Of these, 41 (56.2%) had history-indicated, 17 (23.3%) had ultrasound-indicated and 15 (20.5%) had physical examination-indicated cerclages. Compared to history- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage group, duration from cerclage to delivery (18.6 ± 6.9 weeks vs 17.8±5.9 weeks vs 11 ± 5.3 weeks, p = 0.003) was significantly lower and delivery < 28 weeks (9.8% vs 5.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.042) and delivery < 34 weeks of gestation (26.8% vs 11.8% vs 60%, p = 0.009) were significantly higher in physical examination-indicated cerclage group. In physical examination-indicated cerclage, compared with history- and ultrasound-indicated cerclage low birth weight, low APGAR score, neonatal intensive care unit admission and neonatal mortality were higher, although not statistically significant (p > 0.05).ConclusionPregnant women who underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage had higher risks for preterm delivery < 28 weeks and < 34 weeks than history- and ultrasound–indicated cerclage.

The retrospective study for effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm birth

ObjectiveThis study aimed to clarify the effectiveness of cervical cerclage in preventing recurrent preterm births. Materials and methodsA retrospective study was conducted using the perinatal registration database of the Japan Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology for the Perinatal Center from 2014 to 2016. The efficacies of history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, and physical examination-indicated cerclage as preventive treatments for women with a history of preterm birth were evaluated by comparing cerclage and non-cerclage cases. Fisher's exact test was performed to evaluate any significant differences in patient backgrounds. Prior to the evaluation, propensity score matching was performed for history-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage patients. ResultsFor this study, 6060 multiparous women with a history of preterm birth were reviewed. After excluding 17 patients with unknown indications for cervical cerclage, 6043 patients were included in the study. History-indicated and ultrasound-indicated cerclage did not reduce the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies for any of the pregnancy periods (p = 0.413, p = 1.000). In contrast, physical examination-indicated cerclage significantly reduced the risk of subsequent preterm births for all pregnancy periods (p < 0.001). ConclusionSubsequent preterm births were effectively prevented only in physical examination-indicated cerclage cases. For history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage, statistically significant differences in subsequent preterm births were not evident.

Latency to delivery in physical examination-indicated cerclage in twins is similar to that in singleton pregnancies.

To compare latency to delivery and perinatal outcomes between twin and singleton pregnancies undergoing physical examination-indicated cerclage. Retrospective observational study (2007-2017) of women who underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona. Primary outcomes were latency from cerclage to delivery and gestational age at delivery. Secondary outcomes included: neonatal morbidity and mortality, preterm prelabor rupture of membranes, clinical chorioamnionitis and cerclage displacement. Wilcoxon-test and χ2 test were used to compare continuous and categorical variables. Sixty women were included (17 twins and 43singletons). There were no differences in gestational age at cerclage or presence of bulging membranes between groups. Median (25th;75th percentile) gestational age at delivery was 27.1 (24.5;32.3) weeks in the twin group and 27.6 (25.3;35.3) weeks in the singleton group (P=0.594). There were no statistically significant differences in latency from cervical cerclage to delivery between the two groups (43days [21;64] vs. 29days [16;76], respectively; P=0.938). There were no differences in neonatal mortality (2/26 [7.7%] vs. 1/33 [3.1%]; P=0.578) or in composite neonatal morbidity (14 [53.9%] vs. 14 [42.4%]; P=0.283) between groups, respectively. These results suggest that physical examination-indicated cerclage placement in twins could prolong latency to delivery similarly to singleton pregnancies.

Incidences of complications associated with cervical cerclage by indication of the procedure

To investigate the incidence of complications associated with cervical cerclage by indication. This was a retrospective cohort study of women with singleton pregnancies who underwent cervical cerclage in a single perinatal center between 2008 and 2019. The participants were divided into three groups according to indication: history-indicated cerclage (HIC) group, ultrasound-indicated cerclage (UIC) group, and physical examination-indicated cerclage (PEIC) group. The incidences of perioperative complications within 2 weeks after the procedure, including intraoperative rupture of membranes, intraoperative bleeding, anesthesia complications, clinical chorioamnionitis, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), preterm delivery, and displacement of the suture, and those of peripartum complications, including difficult suture removal and cervical laceration, for each group were compared using Fisher's exact test or Pearson's chi-square test. Factors associated with severe adverse event, defined as PROM or delivery within 2 weeks after the procedure, were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analysis. A total of 279 women (HIC, 38; UIC, 96; PEIC, 145) were enrolled. The incidence of perioperative complications was different among the three groups (7.9%, 10.4%, and 27.6%, respectively; p < 0.01), whereas that of peripartum complications was similar (18.4%, 11.5%, and 12.4%, respectively; p=0.54). Severe adverse events occurred only in PEIC group, with an incidence of 18.6%. The associated factor for severe adverse events in PEIC group was prolapsed membranes into the vagina. Incidences of perioperative complications of cerclage differed among the indications. Women who underwent PEIC had higher risk of severe adverse events, especially when accompanied with prolapsed membranes into the vagina.

Association of adherence to guidelines for cervical cerclage with perinatal outcomes and placental inflammation in women with cervical length ≥2.0 cm

ObjectivesCerclage operation is one of the most common obstetric controversies. The aim of this study was to compare the perinatal outcomes and placental inflammation of cerclage performed adherent and non-adherent to international guidelines. Material and methodsThis study included all consecutive women with singleton deliveries who underwent cerclage. According to the current American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) guideline, we designated our study population into two groups: the adherent-to-guideline and non-adherent groups. Each group was categorized into two groups according to cervical length (CL) at the time of cerclage (<2.0 cm vs. ≥2.0 cm). We evaluated the reasons for cerclage, maternal characteristics, perioperative variables, pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, and placental inflammatory pathology according to the criteria proposed by the Society of Pediatric Pathology. ResultsAmong 310 women with cerclage, we excluded patients (n = 21) with indicated preterm delivery (PTD), major fetal anomaly, fetal death in-utero, and missing information for reason of cerclage. We also excluded patients who underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage (n = 53) and with missing information of CL at the time of cerclage (n = 52). A total of 184 women were eventually analyzed. In women with CL < 2.0 cm, the non-adherent group showed similar PTD (<28 weeks, <34 weeks) and neonatal composite morbidity rates compared to the adherent-to-guideline group. However, in women with CL ≥ 2.0 cm, the non-adherent group manifested significantly higher PTD (<28 weeks; 16.7% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.04, <34 weeks; 23.8% vs. 5.8%, p = 0.006) and neonatal composite morbidity (20.5% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.028) rates than the adherent-to-guideline group despite similar perioperative variables and lower PTD history rates. The non-adherent group with CL ≥ 2 cm at the time of cerclage was also associated with severe histologic chorioamnionitis (p = 0.033). ConclusionCerclage performed beyond the current guidelines in pregnant women with CL ≥ 2.0 cm may confer an additional risk of perinatal complications in association with severe placental inflammation.

Physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies and compare it with those that received conservative management. We used a retrospective cohort study design of asymptomatic twin pregnancies identified with physical examination indications at 14-26weeks from 2015 through 2019 at Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital. The primary outcomes were gestational age (GA) at delivery and the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) at < 34weeks, < 32weeks, < 28weeks, and < 24weeks. The main secondary outcomes were latency period from diagnosis to delivery, composite neonatal adverse outcome and neonatal survival at discharge. Thirty-one women with twin pregnancies were managed with physical examination-indicated cerclage, and another 31 received expectant management. The demographic characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. GA at delivery was significantly later in the cerclage group than in the controls: 32.53 ± 4.78 vs. 27.53 ± 4.15weeks, with a mean difference of 5.00weeks [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.73-7.28]. There were significant decreases in the incidence of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) at < 34weeks, < 32weeks, < 28weeks, and < 24weeks in the cerclage group. The interval from diagnosis to delivery was increased with cerclage by a mean difference of 4.37weeks (95% CI, 1.96-7.06). Regarding neonatal outcome, the perinatal mortality rate in the cerclage group was significantly reduced compared to that in the control group [8/62 (12.9%) vs. 26/62 (41.9%); P < 0001]. Likewise, the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admissions, length of stay in the NICU, and composite adverse neonatal outcome in the cerclage group were significantly reduced. Physical examination-indicated cerclage was associated with significantly later GA at delivery, longer latency period from diagnosis to delivery, decreased incidence of SPTB at any given GA, and improved perinatal outcome compared with the corresponding measures in controls treated conservatively.

Physical examination–indicated cerclage in twin pregnancy: a randomized controlled trial

Women with twin pregnancies and a dilated cervix in the second trimester are at increased risk of pregnancy loss and early preterm birth; there is currently no proven therapy to prevent preterm birth in this group of women. This study aimed to determine whether physical examination-indicated cerclage reduces the incidence of preterm birth in women with a diagnosis of twin pregnancies and asymptomatic cervical dilation before 24 weeks of gestation. Multicenter, parallel group, open-label, randomized controlled trial of women with twin pregnancies and asymptomatic cervical dilation of 1 to 5 cm between 16 weeks 0/7 days of gestation and 23 weeks 6/7 days of gestation were enrolled from July 2015 to July 2019 in 8 centers. Eligible women were randomized in a 1:1 ratio into either cerclage or no cerclage groups. We excluded women with monochorionic-monoamniotic twin pregnancy, selective fetal growth restriction, twin-twin transfusion syndrome, major fetal malformation, known genetic anomaly, placenta previa, signs of labor, or clinical chorioamnionitis. The primary outcome was the incidence of preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were preterm births at <32, <28, and <24 weeks of gestation, interval from diagnosis to delivery, and perinatal mortality. Data were analyzed by intention-to-treat methods. After an interim analysis was performed, the Data and Safety Monitoring Board recommended stopping the trial because of a significant decrease in perinatal mortality in the cerclage group. We randomized 34 women, with 4 women being excluded because of expired informed consent. A total of 17 women were randomized to physical examination-indicated cerclage and 13 women to no cerclage. Whereas 4 women randomized to cerclage did not receive the surgical procedure, no women in the no cerclage group received cerclage. Maternal demographics were not significantly different. All women in the cerclage group also received indomethacin and antibiotics. When comparing the cerclage group vs the no cerclage group, the incidence of preterm birth was significantly decreased as follows: preterm birth at <34 weeks of gestation, 12 of 17 women (70%) vs 13 of 13 women (100%) (risk ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.96); preterm birth at <32 weeks of gestation, 11 of 17 women (64.7%) vs 13 of 13 women (100%) (risk ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.92); preterm birth at <28 weeks of gestation, 7 of 17 women (41%) vs 11 of 13 women (84%) (risk ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.89); and preterm birth at <24 weeks of gestation, 5 of 17 women (30%) vs 11 of 13 women (84%) (risk ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval, 0.16-0.75). The mean gestational age at delivery was 29.05±1.7 vs 22.5±3.9 weeks (P<.01), respectively; the mean interval from diagnosis of cervical dilation to delivery was 8.3±5.8 vs 2.9±3.0 weeks (P=.02), respectively. Perinatal mortality was also significantly reduced in the cerclage group compared with the no cerclage group as follows: 6 of 34 women (17.6%) vs 20 of 26 women (77%) (risk ratio, 0.22; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.5), respectively. In women with twin pregnancies and asymptomatic cervical dilation before 24 weeks of gestation, a combination of physical examination-indicated cerclage, indomethacin, and antibiotics significantly decreased preterm birth at all evaluated gestational ages. Most importantly, cerclage in this population was associated with a 50% decrease in early preterm birth at <28 weeks of gestation and with a 78% decrease in perinatal mortality.

Perioperative Use of Cefazolin and Indomethacin for Physical Examination-Indicated Cerclages to Improve Gestational Latency.

To evaluate gestational latency in individuals who did and did not receive perioperative cefazolin and indomethacin after physical examination-indicated cerclage. This is a retrospective cohort study of all pregnant women with a singleton gestation who underwent physical examination-indicated cerclage placement and delivered at Northwestern Memorial Hospital from 2009 to 2018. Physical examination-indicated cerclage was performed in the setting of painless cervical dilation of at least 1 cm between 16 0/7 and 23 6/7 weeks of gestation. After 2014, our practice universally implemented perioperative prophylaxis of cefazolin and indomethacin. Individuals were categorized based on exposure to perioperative prophylaxis. The primary outcome was pregnancy latency at least 28 days after cerclage placement. Secondary outcomes included median latency; median gestational age at delivery; preterm birth before 28 weeks of gestation; preterm prelabor rupture of membranes; chorioamnionitis; and median birth weight. Multivariable analyses were performed, as well as a sensitivity analysis using propensity score matching. Cerclages were placed in 142 people: 72 (50.7%) received perioperative prophylaxis. Baseline demographics were not significantly different between groups. On multivariable analyses, individuals who received perioperative prophylaxis had a higher incidence of achieving a pregnancy latency at 28 days or more (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.21, 95% CI 1.05-1.40). Individuals who received perioperative prophylaxis had a significant improvement in gestational latency (+17.8 days, 95% CI 1.4-34.2 days) and birth weight (+489.8 g, 95% CI 64.6-915.0 g), with no differences in other outcomes. On sensitivity analysis, individuals receiving perioperative prophylaxis had a higher incidence of achieving a pregnancy latency at 28 days or more, (aRR 1.17, 95% CI 1.01-1.36) with no differences in other outcomes. Perioperative use of cefazolin and indomethacin prophylaxis during physical examination-indicated cerclage placement is associated with a significant prolongation in gestational latency without an increase in incidence of chorioamnionitis.

Efficacy of physical examination-indicated cerclage in twin pregnancies compared with singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To compare the pregnancy outcomes of physical examination-indicated cerclage (PEIC) between twin and singleton pregnancies with acute cervical insufficiency. We searched Medline, Ovid, Scopus, EBSCO, ClinicalTrials.gov and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from their commencement until Dec 2019 for relevant studies. Patient-level data abstraction and analysis were done by two independent authors. A total of five studies with 786 women were included in the final analysis. The pooled outcomes showed that PEIC was associated with a similar reduction in preterm birth (PTB) at <32 (Risk ratio [RR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.79-1.11, I2=0%, P=0.43), and 28 (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.82-1.29, I2=0%, P=0.81) weeks of gestation; however, a much higher frequency of PTB was observed at <36 (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.66-0.83, I2=0%, P<0.000), and 34 (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.68-0.93, I2=0%, P=0.004) weeks of gestation in twin pregnancies than in singleton pregnancies. No significant differences in perinatal outcomes, including neonatal death (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.64-1.67, I2=52%, P=0.900), stillbirth (RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.37-1.44, I2=0%, P=0.360), perinatal mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.65-1.38, P=0.760) and neonatal complications were found between twin and singleton pregnancies. Our meta-analysis indicated that PEIC achieved good perinatal prognosis in both singleton and twin pregnancies. However, because the available evidence is insufficient to attain a strong conclusion, so further high-quality trials are needed to confirm our findings.