Photorefractive Keratectomy For Myopia Research Articles

Photorefractive keratectomy in flat, normal, and steep corneas.

To compare photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) outcomes in patients with different corneal steepness. Care-Vision Laser Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel. Retrospective comparative chart review. Patients included in this study underwent wavefront optimized myopic PRK between January 2013 and December 2019. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the steepness of the cornea (steep keratometry) (flat: <42 diopters [D], normal: 42 to 46 D and steep: >46 D). One to one matching was performed to verify that baseline parameters (age, preoperative visual acuity and refractive error) were similar between groups. Primary outcome measures were: postoperative corrected/uncorrected distance visual acuity (CDVA/UDVA), efficacy index (postoperative UDVA/preoperative CDVA), safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA), spherical equivalence (SEQ) and cylinder. After matching, 650 eyes were included in each group, which were similar in baseline parameters. There were no significant postoperative differences between flat, normal, and steep corneas in terms of safety index (1.02 vs 1.03 vs 1.03, P = .28), efficacy index (1.01 vs 1.01 vs 1.02, P = .57), logMAR CDVA (0.01 vs 0.02 vs 0.01, P = .76), logMAR UDVA (0.02 vs 0.03 vs 0.02, P = .68), %SEQ within 0.50 D (73.9% vs 74.2% vs 74.6%, P = .95) or 1.00 D of target (91.9% vs 92.5% vs 92.2%, P = .92), %cylinder within 0.50 D (82.8% vs 82.2% vs 81.4%, P = .81) or 1.00 D of target (96.9% vs 97.1% vs 97.2%, P = .95). No significant differences were found between flat, normal and steep corneas following wavefront-optimized myopic PRK. Thus, this procedure may be safely and effectively performed in both flat and steep corneas.

Intraocular Pressure Changes in Myopic Patients Undergoing Laser In-Situ Keratomileusis and Photorefractive Keratectomy.

To assess the variation in intraocular pressure measurements between Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) in myopic patients undergoing laser assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Quasi-experimental study. Place and Duration of the Study: Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology (AFIO), National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, between September 2020 and 2021. Myopic patients undergoing LASIK and PRK during the study period were selected. Baseline examinations and postoperative follow-ups were carried out to measure intraocular pressure at 1, 3, and 6 months after LASIK or PRK, using Goldmann Applanation Tonometer (GAT) and Ocular Response Analyzer, corneal compensated IOP (ORA IOPcc). One hundred and thirteen eyes underwent myopic refractive surgery, LASIK (n = 60) or PRK (n = 53). Mean age of patients was 23.6 ± 4.11 years in the PRK group and 24.4 ± 5.94 years in LASIK group. For the PKR group, the GAT IOP value increased at 1-month (p <0.001), decreased at 3-month (p <0.001) and further decreased at 6-month (p <0.001) follow-up postoperatively. In the LASIK group, the GAT IOP value decreased at all time points (p <0.001). In both groups, the mean ORA IOPcc value increased at 1 month (p <0.001), decreased at 3-month (p <0.001) and further decreased at 6-month (p <0.001) follow-up postoperatively. The IOP mean values were generally found to be higher when measured using ORA as compared with GAT. Corneal refractive surgery markedly decreased IOP. This decrease in IOP was observed more after LASIK than after PRK. ORA was less likely to underestimate the intraocular pressure than GAT. Myopia, Laser in-situ keratomileusis, Photorefractive keratectomy, Tonometery ocular, Intraocular pressure.

Myopic regression after photorefractive keratectomy: a retrospective cohort study.

Myopic regression is a major complication of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). The rates and causes vary considerably among different studies. This study aimed to investigate myopic regression at six months after myopic PRK. In this retrospective cohort study, we included all eligible patients with myopia ranging from - 0.75 to - 9 D, aged 18 to 50 years, who underwent PRK by a single surgeon with the availability of preoperative and postoperative data at six months after the initial procedure. All participants underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations preoperatively and at six months post-PRK. Overcorrection was planned based on the participant's age range to achieve the desired refractive result after PRK. All patients received the same postoperative antibiotic and steroid eye drops in a similar dosage regimen, and the contact lenses were removed after complete corneal epithelial healing. Based on the spherical equivalent of refraction six months after PRK, eyes without and with myopic regression were allocated into groups 1 and 2, respectively. We included 254 eyes of 132 patients who underwent myopic PRK with a mean (standard deviation) age of 30.12 (7.48) years; 82 (62.12%) were women and 50 (37.88%) were men. The frequency of myopic regression was significantly lower in patients with younger age, lower preoperative cylindrical refraction, and lower ablation depth (all P < 0.05). Overcorrection was more successful in eyes with low myopia than in eyes with high myopia (P < 0.05). The highest frequency of myopic regression occurred in eyes with moderate myopia (25.68%), followed by eyes with high myopia (20.0%) and low myopia (6.54%). Among different age groups, patients aged ≤ 30 years had a lower frequency of myopic regression. The frequency of myopic regression in the different age groups was 5.0% at 18 - 20 years, 7.46% at 26 - 30 years, 12.28% at 21 - 25 years, 21.31% at 31 - 35 years, and 26.53% at 36 - 50 years. Overcorrection was more successful in eyes with low myopia than in eyes with high myopia. The success rate was higher in younger patients with lower astigmatism and ablation depths. Myopic regression was most frequent in eyes with moderate myopia, followed by those with high and low myopia. Further studies should replicate our findings over a longer follow-up period with a larger sample size before generalization is warranted.

Comparison of IOP obtained in different kind of eyes with contact and no contact tonometers.

The aim of this study is to analyze and compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) values measured in three different kinds of participants such as healthy subjects (HS), keratoconus patients (KP), and those who underwent myopic photorefractive keratectomy (MPRK). The devices used in this study are the Goldmann Applanation Tonometry (GAT), the dynamic contour tonometry (DCT), the ocular response analyzer (ORA), and the Corvis ST (CST). This research included 92 eyes of 92 h, 63 eyes of 63 KP, and 58 eyes of 58 MPRKM. Each participant underwent a complete ophthalmic evaluation and IOP measurement with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST. A statistical analysis was conducted to detect possible differences and correlations. First, according to the observed data, HS eyes displayed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST, respectively, 15.82 ± 2.74 mmHg, 17.63 ± 2.28 mmHg, 16.24 ± 3.14 mmHg, and 17.31 ± 3.21 mmHg. Then, KP eyes showed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST of, respectively, 14.89 ± 1.64 mmHg, 16.97 ± 2.08 mmHg, 13.09 ± 3.12 mmHg, and 13.78 ± 2.11 mmHg. Finally, MPRK eyes showed mean IOP values measured with GAT, DCT, ORA, and CST of, respectively, 13.92 ± 1.34 mmHg, 15.39 ± 2.86 mmHg, 16.63 ± 2.51 mmHg, and 15.06 ± 1.56 mmHg. According to the observed data, ORA and GAT might be used interchangeably in HS, whereas GAT, ORA, and CST in KP eyes. Moreover, it has been noticed that in those eyes that previously undergone a myopic PRK, GAT provided lower values of IOP in comparison with other devices.

Goldmann and modified Goldmann tonometry measuring intraocular pressure changes in eyes which underwent myopic laser in situ Keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy

PurposeCompare intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by a standard Goldmann applanation tonometer prism (IOPg) and a modified correcting applanation tonometer surface Goldmann prism (IOPc) before and after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).MethodsGoldmann tonometry was analyzed in a retrospective, cross-sectional study, using both GAT and modified-GAT prisms pre-operatively and at the 3 month post-operative appointment on 120 eyes (64 patients) who received LASIK (n = 58) or PRK (n = 62). Demographics, central corneal thickness (CCT), manifest refraction and corneal curvature (CC) data was collected at each visit as well as surgical parameters, including maximum ablation depth.ResultsMean paired IOP following LASIK decreased by − 3.28 ± 3.2 mmHg measured by IOPg and − 1.93 ± 3.3 mmHg by IOPc (p ≤ 0.0001). Mean paired IOP following PRK reduced by − 1.92 ± 3.6 mmHg measured by IOPg and − 1.06 ± 3.6 mmHg by IOPc (p ≤ 0.0001). Increased LASIK ablation depth and post-procedural change in CCT trended toward a statistically significant reduction in IOPg (p = 0.07,p = 0.12), but not IOPc (p = 0.18,p = 0.32). PRK ablation depth was not associated with a reduction in IOPg or IOPc.DiscussionThe modified Goldmann (IOPc) prism measured less of an IOP reduction following LASIK and PRK compared to the standard (IOPg) prism, and the IOP reduction with both prisms was associated with the degree of myopic correction.What is already known and the residual queryCorneal refractive surgery generally demonstrates significant postoperative Goldmann IOP reductions. Presumably, this is due to corneal biomechanical changes for which a newer method of Goldmann IOP measurement may be able to compensate.What this study addsA modified, corneal conforming Goldmann prism demonstrates significantly less IOP reduction following myopic LASIK and PRK compared to the standard flat Goldmann prism.How this study might affect research, practice or policyA newer, modified Goldmann prism may help detect glaucoma and OHT at an earlier stage in patients which have undergone LASIK or PRK. The findings corroborate predicted corneal biomechanical changes following the most common corneal refractive procedures.

Analysis of corneal biomechanical properties 25years after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.

To evaluate corneal biomechanical changes using Corvis ST in patients treated with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) 25years ago. In this study, 32 post-PRK and 38 normal eyes underwent Corvis ST (CST) assessments. The measured CST factors were: time of highest concavity (HC), time of applanation 1 (AT1), time of applanation 2 (AT2), length of applanation 1 (AL1), length of applanation 2 (AL2), velocity of applanation 1 (AV1), velocity of applanation 2 (AV2), deformation amplitude (DA), peak distance (PD), integrated radius (IR), Ambrosio relational thickness horizontal (ARTh), stiffness parameter at first applanation (SP-A1), DA ratio (2mm), Belin/Ambrosio enhanced ectasia display (BAD) and corneal biomechanical index (CBI). The mean [± standard deviation (SD)] age was 51.4 ± 7.36years in PRK, 51.4 ± 3.62 in control group. PRK was performed 24.69 ± 1.78years ago. ARTh, SP-A1, AT1, AL1, and AL2 were lower in PRK. PD, AT2, DA ratio (2mm), and IR were statistically higher in PRK (P < 0.01). In PRK and control group the mean value of CBI was 0.91 ± 0.11 and 0.50 ± 0.27 (P < 0.001), and mean value of BAD was 3.34 ± 1.53 and 1.1 ± 0.70 (P < 0.001). In PRK 71.9% of eyes were classed "high risk CBI plus diseased BAD" and 25% remained in the "high risk CBI and normal BAD" group. In this study, most of the post-PRK eyes which were clinically and topographically normal were classified as "high risk CBI plus diseased BAD" and had significantly worse CBI and BAD values than the control group. This leads to the conclusion that CBI and BAD alone are not appropriate to evaluate post-PRK ectasia.

Femtosecond LASIK Retreatments After Primary Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy.

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results and complications of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using a femtosecond laser as a retreatment modality of myopia and myopic astigmatism after previous myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). In this retrospective, consecutive, noncomparative case series study, 69 eyes of 41 patients receiving femtosecond LASIK after previous myopic PRK were evaluated. The mean age was 43.0 ± 8.9 years. The preoperative mean SE was -1.82 ± 1.01 diopter (D), range -0.62 to -6.25. The mean central epithelial thickness was 65 ± 5 μm. A flap was created using a low-energy femtosecond laser (Ziemer LDV Z8), with a programmed thickness calculated by adding 40 μm to the epithelial thickness. Refractive ablation was performed using a Technolas Teneo 317 laser (Bausch and Lomb). Twelve months after LASIK, the mean SE was -0.03 ± 0.17 D, with all eyes ≤0.50 D of SE. The mean DE was 0.30 ± 0.25, with 62 eyes (89.9%) ≤0.50 D and all eyes ≤1 D. The mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.04 ± 0.10 logMAR; no eye lost more than 1 line of CDVA. The mean uncorrected distance visual acuity was 0.07 ± 0.13 logMAR, being 20/25 or better in all eyes. The safety index (postoperative CDVA/preoperative CDVA) was 1.05. The efficacy index (postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity/preoperative CDVA) was 0.98. No significant complications occurred. Myopic retreatments by femtosecond LASIK after primary PRK yielded excellent refractive results without relevant complications. The flap thickness must be tailored to the epithelial thickening after PRK.

Evaluating Intraocular Pressure After Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Comparison of Different Tonometers.

All devices evaluated in this study showed a significant underestimation in intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK), Goldmann tonometer more than others. Corneal biomechanics indicated a different influence on the different kinds of tonometry. The aim was to investigate the reliability of Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), rebound tonometry (RT), ocular response analyzer (ORA), Corvis ST (CST), and dynamic contour tonometry (DCT) in IOP evaluation after myopic PRK. One eye of 145 patients who underwent myopic PRK for a refractive defect ranging from -10.25 to -0.50 D (mean -4.69±2.00 D) was included in this retrospective comparative study. A complete eye visit with corneal tomography and IOP measurement with GAT, DCT, ORA, RT, and CST was performed before surgery and at 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up. Values provided by each device were tested and compared at each follow-up. Correlation analyses were run between changes in IOP and the corneal, morphologic and biomechanical parameters were measured after PRK. GAT, DCT, ORA, RT, and CST showed a significant (P<0.01) underestimation of IOP at 6 months follow-up. GAT showed the greatest underestimation (-14.1%) and stronger correlations with corneal deformation parameter changes, whereas ORA, DCT, and RT appeared to be less conditioned by these variations. At 6 months follow-up DCT, ORA, RT, and CST provided IOP values with nonsignificant differences compared with GAT before PRK. Each tested tonometer showed a significant IOP underestimation after myopic PRK. As this was most observed with GAT compared with all devices, we suggest DCT, ORA, RT, or CST to evaluate IOP in these patients following surgery.

Influence of Posterior Corneal Asphericity On Power Calculation Error After Laser In Situ Keratomileusis or Photorefractive Keratectomy for Myopia.

To assess the impact of posterior corneal asphericity on postoperative calculation error using the Haigis-L and the Barrett formulas for eyes after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). We assessed the mean absolute error (MAE) of two power calculation formulas, Barrett true-K and Haigis-L formulas, in a retrospective analysis of 34 eyes of 34 patients who underwent cataract surgery. We performed a regression analysis between corneal parameters (anterior and posterior Q values, Kmax, K1, and K2) and the MAE of each formula. In the cohort, 11 eyes were of women and 23 of men. The average age of the study population was 66.5±8.6 years. The mean axial length was 24±4.7 mm, the mean anterior chamber depth was 3.27±0.7 mm, and the mean posterior Q-value was -0.15±0.28. The MAE of Haigis-L and Barrett true-K formulas were 0.72 and 0.68, respectively (P=0.54). The regression analysis showed a statistically significant relationship only between the error in refraction prediction and the posterior Q-value regardless of the formula used. The coefficient of determination was higher for the Barrett true-K formula (r=0.52; R2=0.28; P<0.05), compared with the Haigis-L (r=0.49; R2=0.25; P<0.05). Posterior corneal surface asphericity influences the refractive error of calculation using both Haigis-L and Barrett true-K formulas for eyes after a myopic PRK or laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis surgery.

Assessment of Refractive Outcome of Photo Refractive Keratectomy in Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

To determine the refractive outcomes of wavefront optimized photo refractive keratectomy (PRK) in patients having myopia and myopic astigmatism in terms of efficacy, safety, accuracy, stability and predictability of the procedure. Quasi-experimental study. Refractive Surgical Unit, Armed Forces Institute of Ophthalmology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, from October 2013 to August 2018. Patients having myopia and myopic astigmatism, consented to be a part of the study, underwent meticulous screening consisting of detailed medical history, ocular examination and investigations. Each case was compiled and evaluated. Those who satisfied the criteria for refractive surgery were subjected to PRK procedure. Postoperative follow-up was carried out and parameters were recorded at designated intervals of 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. This study included 208 eyes of 106 patients with mean age of 25.33 + 5.196 years. At the end of one year, 97% (202 out of 208) eyes had uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) better than 20/25 with efficacy index of 1.009 ± 0.132 and safety index of 1.019 ± 0.126. None of the eyes lost two or more lines. In this study, 207 out of 208 eyes remained within + 0.50 diopter (D) of intended spherical equivalent (SEQ). Results showed 100% accuracy of procedure since all the study patients achieved SEQ within + 1D. PRK is an effective, predictable, and safe treatment procedure for correcting myopia and myopic astigmatism. Key Words: Photorefractive keratectomy, Myopia, Refractive surgery, Myopic astigmatism, Uncorrected distance visual acuity.

Comparison of Central and Peripheral Contrast Sensitivity Between Healthy and Refractive Surgery Patients Using the Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) Test.

To assess contrast sensitivity of central and peripheral vision with a newly developed, internet-based Spaeth/Richman Contrast Sensitivity (SPARCS) test in patients who underwent myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (FSLASIK) refractive surgery in comparison with controls. In a retrospective study, a total of 186 eyes from 93 patients were analyzed: 62 eyes from 31 patients for each of the three groups under comparison. Patients who underwent a refractive surgery procedure and controls were evaluated using the SPARCS test. SPARCS scores were obtained for central and four peripheral areas (right upper, right lower, left upper, and left lower quadrants). Total, central, and peripheral SPARCS scores in patients with refractive surgery were compared with controls, adjusting for possible confounders. Multivariate and mixed linear regression models were used. Patients who had PRK had a lower score in all categories compared with the control group: by 5.9 points (95% CI: -9 to -2.8) in the total score, by 1.6 points (95% CI: -3 to -0.3) in the central score, and by 5.5 points (95% CI: -9.4 to -1.6) in the peripheral score. Patients who had FS-LASIK had non-statistically significant lower scores than the control group. PRK causes a decrease in central and peripheral contrast sensitivity. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(2):128-133.].

Intraocular pressure trend following myopic photorefractive keratectomy.

To evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP) trend and risk factors for IOP rise after myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). One eye of each patient undergone PRK for myopia was randomly assigned to this study. All eyes underwent tonometry by CorVis Scheimpflug Technology (CST) tonometer (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) 1week, 2weeks, 1month, 2months, 3months and 4months after surgery. The eyes with IOP rise more than 5mmHg and the risk factors were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier graph and multiple Cox regression analysis. A total of 348 eyes of 348 patients were enrolled in this study. Forty-three eyes (12.35%) experienced a steroid-induced IOP rise of more than 5mmHg. Eyes with IOP rise had higher baseline IOP (Median 19mmHg (IQR 18-22) versus Median 15mmHg (IQR 14-16); p < 0.001). Baseline central corneal thickness (CCT) was higher in eyes without IOP rise (Median 520µm (IQR 509-541) versus Median 535µm (IQR 518-547); p = 0.009). In multivariate Cox regression analysis, higher baseline IOP was a risk factor for IOP rise (Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.59 (95% CI 1.43-1.77); p < 0.001) while higher baseline CCT was protective (HR 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.98); p < 0.001). Eyes with higher baseline IOP and lower baseline CCT are at increased risk of IOP rise after PRK and should be monitored more frequently.

Comparison of the Cost-Effectiveness of SMILE, FS-LASIK, and PRK for Myopia in a Private Eye Center in Spain.

To describe and compare the cost-effectiveness of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE), femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK), and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for treating myopia and myopic astigmatism in a private eye center. The perspectives for this cost-effectiveness analysis were for the payer and the health care sector. For the payer's perspective, a decision tree model was made, with a time period of 30 years, and the average weighted utility values and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were computed for each procedure. The average weighted costs were derived for each procedure and divided by the QALY to obtain the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER). For the health care sector's perspective, the direct and indirect costs of acquiring the equipment and maintaining the facilities-including consumables and personnel salaries-were obtained to compute the minimum number of patients treated per year. The weighted utility values were 0.8 for SMILE and PRK and 0.77 for FS-LASIK. The weighted QALYs were 24 for SMILE and PRK, and 23.1 for FS-LASIK. The average weighted costs were 335.45, 443, and 346.96€, respectively. The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 13.98 €/QALY for SMILE, 18.46 €/QALY for PRK, and 15.02 €/QALY for FS-LASIK. There was a negative correlation between the ICER and the time (in years) after the surgery. To achieve a profit, the minimum number of patients treated per year is 155 for SMILE, 136 for PRK, and 155 for FS-LASIK. Laser corneal refractive surgery is cost-effective for a person desirous of refractive correction for myopia. SMILE had the lowest ICER, followed by FS-LASIK and PRK. This trend was noted at all time periods. The cost of investing in laser refractive surgery facilities is outweighed by the potential income in high-volume eye centers. [J Refract Surg. 2022;38(1):21-26.].

Effect of Short Versus Long-Term Steroid on Corneal Haze After Photorefractive Keratectomy: A Randomized, Double-Masked Clinical Trial

To compare the effect of duration of fluorometholone 0.1% treatment on corneal haze after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02%. Prospective, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. Single-center clinical trial of 252 myopic PRK candidates (252 eyes) aged 21 to 40 years with a mean spherical equivalent (SE) of ≤ 6 diopters (D). Participants were randomized to receive one of the three corticosteroid regimens after PRK: Group A=1 month followed by 2-month placebo; Group B=2 months followed by 1-month placebo; and Group C=3 months. The main outcome measures were corneal haze incidence, subjective SE, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and corneal densitometry. The corneal haze incidence (Grade ≥ 1) at 12 months was 1.35% (1/74 eyes) in Group A and 0% in the other two groups. The mean anterior corneal densitometry (grayscale unit) was 21.19 ± 2.07, 21.09 ± 2.19, and 21.31 ± 2.21 in Groups A, B and C, respectively. The mean SE was 0 ± 0.09, 0 ± 0.11, and 0 ± 0.10, and UDVA (decimal) was 1 ± 0, 1 ± 0.01, and 1 ± 0 in Groups A, B and C, respectively. During 1-year follow-up, no statistically significant difference was observed in mean SE (P=.158), UDVA (P=.343), and anterior corneal densitometry (P=.109) at any stage between the study groups. Long-term topical corticosteroids are unnecessary following PRK with MMC for moderate myopia.

Successful Photorefractive Keratectomy in a Case of Wilson’s Disease

Purpose To report a female with a history of Wilson's disease who underwent a successful photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopic correction. Case Presentation. A twenty-year-old female with a history of Wilson's disease and D-penicillamine use was referred to our clinic for myopic refractive surgery. Her best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/20 for both eyes with a refraction of ‐1.25‐0.5∗75° and ‐1.25‐0.25∗55° for the right and left eyes. The slit examination showed a prominent Kayser-Fleischer ring (K-F ring) in both eyes. She underwent a successful myopic PRK surgery, and her BCVA became 20/20 with no significant refraction. Conclusions In this report, we report a successful PRK surgery for myopic correction in a case of Wilson's disease with prominent K-F rings in both eyes.

Haze prevention following photorefractive keratectomy in brown eyes

To study corneal haze following myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) in a high-risk population and to assess methods for minimizing the risk. The medical records of 150 patients who underwent PRK were reviewed. A total of 300 eyes were included. All patients underwent myopic PRK using the Allegretto Wave Concerto 500Hz (Wavelight AG, Erlangen, Germany)excimer laser platform with intraoperative mitomycin-C (MMC) application. Demographic data including age, gender and ethnicity in addition to preoperative and postoperative subjective manifest refraction, spherical equivalent, best-corrected distance visual acuity, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), postoperative corneal haze grade and other possible postoperative complications were retrieved. Hanna grading (0-4+) was used to evaluate corneal haze. The patients were comprised of 74 men (49.3%) and 76 women (50.7%). The mean age at the time of surgery was 26.5±6.0 (range, 17-46) years. All patients were Saudis with brown irides. UDVA improved to 20/25 in 93.8% at 3 months. The mean and standard deviation of preoperative spherical equivalent was -3.02±1.63 (range, -7.63 - -0.13). At 3 months, postoperative spherical equivalent improved to 0.05±0.50 (-1.00 - +1.00). At 6 months, 13.6% exhibited corneal haze of grade 1, and none exhibited grades 2 or 3. The results of this study confirmed that patients with brown irides can achieve favorable outcomes after PRK. MMC, postoperative topical steroids and ultraviolet protection evidently play a major role in preventing corneal haze in high-risk populations.

Contralateral Eye Study of Topography Guided versus Q Value Adjusted Photorefractive Keratectomy in Myopia and Myopic Astigmatism.

Purpose of the StudyTo compare visual outcome, higher order aberrations (HOAs) of topography guided and Q value adjusted ablation in the fellow eye of patients undergoing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for the correction of myopia and myopic astigmatism.MethodsProspective randomized controlled interventional clinical study. The eyes of 52 patients undergoing PRK for myopia and astigmatism were included, that is, 104 eyes in total. In each patient, eyes were randomly allocated to group I: one eye received topography guided PRK using Contoura ablation software, or group II: the other eye received Q value adjusted PRK using Custom Q ablation software.Follow-UpSix months.ResultsAt the end of 6 months, LogMAR UDVA was −0.04 ± 0.12 and −0.05 ± 0.11 (p = 0.688), while LogMAR CDVA was −0.06 ± 0.09 and −0.06 ± 0.1 in group I and group II, respectively (p = 0.972). Both groups showed a progressive oblate shift with time. This oblate shift was insignificantly less in group I by Topolyzer at 6mm, 15° and 30° at 6 months (p = 0.102, p = 0.138, p = 0.245, respectively). Topolyzer identified a significant difference between the change in coma and trefoil in both groups at 6 months (p<0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively). This was caused by the significant worsening of coma in group II (p<0.001) and the significant improvement of trefoil in group I (p = 0.007). No significant difference was found between groups in the change of ISV or ABR (p = 0.955 and 0.982, respectively). Ablation depth is a significant predictor of ΔQ at 6mm, 15° and 30° (p = 0.009, 0.039 and 0, respectively). No significant difference was found in the Strehl ratio or contrast sensitivity, although they were insignificantly better in group I (p = 0.785 and p = 0.745, respectively).ConclusionTG PRK and CQ PRK yielded similar results regarding UDVA, CDVA, MRSE, safety, predictability and contrast sensitivity. Both groups showed a progressive oblate shift, which was less in the TG group but the difference was statistically insignificant. TG PRK showed significantly improved trefoil HOA as compared to CQ PRK.

Compensatory Corneal Epithelial Thickness Changes after Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy Imaged with Ultra High Resolution AnteriorSegment Optical Coherence Tomography

Purpose: To evaluate how corneal epithelium thickness changes after myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy (PRK) relate to the magnitude of myopic correction, the diameter of the Optical Zone (OZ) and the incidence of regression in the early postoperative period. Setting: Tertiary referral center Design: Prospective longitudinal cohort study Methods: Twenty-two eyes of 11 patients with mean manifest spherical equivalent of -4.75 ± 1.69 D underwent PRK between November 2016 and March 2017. Epithelial thickness profiles were evaluated preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 6 month’s postoperatively using ultra-high resolution anterior segment OCT. The relationship between post-operative epithelial thickness changes and the magnitude of myopic correction, the OZ diameter and the refractive outcomes was investigated prospectively. Results: Central epithelial thickening progressed during the first three postoperative months (p=0.045, between first and third postoperative month) and stabilized thereafter (p=0.980, between third and sixth postoperative month). A corresponding myopic shift of 0.13 D and an increase in mean K by 0.65 D were observed at three months postoperatively, which remained stable thereafter and did not affect the final refractive outcomes (mean postoperative spherical equivalent 0.14 ± 0.40 D). Central epithelial thickness increased proportionally with the amount of myopia treated (r=0.41, p=0.04) and reversely with the ablation zone diameter (r=-0.39, p=0.04). Conclusion: Corneal epithelial hyperplasia after myopic PRK is dependent on the preoperative myopic error and ablation zone diameter. Epithelial hyperplasia-induced regression did not have a negative effect on the overall refractive outcome. Synopsis: The degree of epithelial thickening and hyperopic shift post-PRK depends on the preoperative refraction and the optical zone diameter. The subsequent regression does not negatively affect the refractive outcome.

Analysis of Corneal Distortion after Myopic PRK

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the corneal biomechanical properties (CBP) and their behaviors after myopic refractive surgery both with Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) and Corvis ST (CST). This retrospective study included 145 eyes of 145 patients with a mean age of 33.13 ± 9.24 years, who underwent myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for a refractive defect, measured as spherical equivalent, of mean −4.69 ± 2.04 D and have been evaluated before surgery and at 1, 3 and 6 months follow-up. Corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) values significantly decreased after 1 month and remained statistically stable during further follow-ups. CST parameters had a different evolution: only second applanation time (AT2) differences showed a significant variation after 1 month that did not statistically change over time. Highest concavity deformation amplitude (HCDA), highest concavity peak distance (HCPD), first applanation time (AT1) and velocity (AV1) showed continuous significant differences both after 3 and after 6 months. This study suggests that after central surface ablation surgery, such as myopic PRK, corneal shape is remodeling, and its deformation parameters are going to change even at 6 months follow-up. This indicates that it should be important to evaluate refractive surgery patients during a longer follow-up because this could allow earlier diagnosis and better management of late-onset complications.

Sensitivity and Specificity of Belin Ambrosio Enhanced Ectasia Display in Early Diagnosis of Keratoconus.

Purpose Early diagnosis of keratoconus disease (KCN) is the first priority in the preoperative evaluations of refractive surgery (RS).The aim of this study was to investigate the correlation between findings of Belin Ambrosio enhanced ectasia display (BAD) software and conventional corneal imaging (Orbscan and topography) in the early diagnosis of KCN. Methods For conducting this cross-sectional study, a total of 1000 eyes were selected from 500 patients that underwent the myopic photorefractive keratectomy surgery and were compared in four study groups during the years 2017–2018. In group 1, all topography, Orbscan, and BAD criteria were normal (65.8%).In contrast, in Group 2, at least one of the topography or Orbscan criteria as well as at least one BAD criterion (12.6%) were abnormal. In Group 3, the eyes had normal Orbscan and topography criteria with at least one abnormal BAD criterion (18.5%). Also, in Group 4, the patients had at least one abnormal Orbscan or topography criterion, but all BAD criteria (3.1%) were normal. Thickness of the thinnest point (TP) of cornea was compared in Pentacam and topography. Data analysis was done by SPSS software (version 21). Results BAD criteria were normal in 78.5% of all eyes with normal topography and Orbscan criteria (specificity). BAD criteria were also abnormal in 80.2% of eyes (sensitivity). There was also no significant difference between TP in Orbscan and Pentacam. Conclusions BAD criteria had a relatively acceptable sensitivity and specificity, compared with conventional Orbscan and topography criteria. Thus, BAD criteria can be more effective in the early diagnosis of KCN.