Phosphorylation Of E2F1 Research Articles

Calcineurin-mediated dephosphorylation stabilizes E2F1 protein by suppressing binding of the FBXW7 ubiquitin ligase subunit

The transcription factor E2F1 serves as a regulator of the cell cycle and promotes cell proliferation. It is highly expressed in cancer tissues and contributes to their malignant transformation. Degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system may help to prevent such overexpression of E2F1 and thereby to suppress carcinogenesis. A detailed understanding of the mechanisms underlying E2F1 degradation may therefore inform the development of new cancer treatments. We here identified SCFFBXW7 as a ubiquitin ligase for E2F1 by comprehensive analysis. We found that phosphorylation of E2F1 at serine-403 promotes its binding to FBXW7 (F-box/WD repeat-containing protein 7) followed by its ubiquitination and degradation. Furthermore, calcineurin, a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent serine-threonine phosphatase, was shown to stabilize E2F1 by mediating its dephosphorylation at serine-403 and thereby preventing FBXW7 binding. Treatment of cells with Ca2+ channel blockers resulted in downregulation of both E2F1 protein and the expression of E2F1 target genes, whereas treatment with the Ca2+ ionophore ionomycin induced upregulation of E2F1. Finally, the calcineurin inhibitor FK506 attenuated xenograft tumor growth in mice in association with downregulation of E2F1 in the tumor tissue. Impairment of the balance between the opposing actions of FBXW7 and calcineurin in the regulation of E2F1 abundance may therefore play an important role in carcinogenesis.

Phospholipase PLCE1 Promotes Transcription and Phosphorylation of MCM7 to Drive Tumor Progression in Esophageal Cancer.

PLCE1 promotes tumor progression in ESCC by activating PKCα-mediated phosphorylation of E2F1 to upregulate MCM7 and miR-106b-5p expression and by potentiating MCM7 phosphorylation by RIOK2.

Aberrant Nuclear Translocation of E2F1 and Its Association in Cushing's Disease.

Nonsurgical medical treatments are often performed for Cushing's disease due to high recurrence rates. However, current medical treatment that targets corticotroph adenomas are limited. To develop a treatment that specifically targets corticotrophs in Cushing's disease, it is necessary to identify corticotroph lineage-specific proteins, which are involved in the Cushing's tumor phenotype. We have previously reported that the expression of E2F transcription factor 1 (E2F1), one of the cell cycle regulatory proteins, was increased in corticotrophs in Cushing's disease model mice and was involved in the regulation of POMC gene expression. Phosphorylation of Ser337 of E2F1 (pS337-E2F1) facilitates its binding to the POMC promoter, which was suggested to contribute to elevated POMC expression in corticotrophs. Here, we report that E2F1 expression is specific to the corticotroph lineage in normal human pituitaries and that the E2F1 protein is localized in the cytosol in normal corticotrophs. We show that pS337-E2F1 is localized in the nucleus specifically in Cushing's tumors, while it is localized in the perinuclear cytoplasm in the normal pituitary. This observation demonstrates that pS337 is a marker for Cushing's tumors and suggests that phosphorylation of E2F1 may be a target for developing a novel pharmacological treatment for tumorigenesis and hormone dysregulation of Cushing's disease.

Regulation of E2F1 activity via PKA-mediated phosphorylations.

E2F1 becomes activated during the G1 phase of the cell cycle, and posttranslational modifications modulate its activity. Activation of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCR) by many ligands induces the activation of adenylate cyclases and the production of cAMP, which activates the PKA enzyme. Activated PKA elicits its biological effect by phosphorylating the target proteins containing serine or threonine amino acids in the RxxS/T motif. Since PKA activation negatively regulates cell proliferation, we thought that activated PKA would negatively affect the activity of E2F1. In line with this, when we analyzed the amino acid sequence of E2F1, we found 3 hypothetical consensus PKA phosphorylation sites located at 127-130, 232-235, and 361-364 positions and RYET, RLLS, and RMGS sequences. After showing the binding and phosphorylation of E2F1 by PKA, we converted the codons of Threonine-130, Serine-235, and Serine-364 to Alanine and Glutamic acid codons on the eukaryotic E2F1 expression vector we had previously created. We confirmed the phosphorylation of T130, S235, and S364 by developing monoclonal antibodies against phospho-specific forms of these sites and showed that their phosphorylation is cell cycle-dependent. According to our results, PKA-mediated phosphorylation of E2F1 by PKA inhibits proliferation and glucose uptake and induces caspase-3 activation and senescence.

Phosphorylated E2F1 is stabilized by nuclear USP11 to drive Peg10 gene expression and activate lung epithelial cells.

Phosphorylation affects ubiquitination, stability, and activity of transcriptional factors, thus regulating various cellular functions. E2F transcriptional factor 1 (E2F1) regulates paternally expressed imprinted gene 10 (Peg10) expression, thereby promoting cell proliferation. However, the effect of E2F1 stability on Peg10 expression and the molecular regulation of E2F1 stability by its phosphorylation have not been well demonstrated. Here, we describe a new pathway in which phosphorylation of E2F1 by GSK3β increases E2F1 association with the deubiquitinating enzyme, ubiquitin-specific protease 11 (USP11), which removes K63-linked ubiquitin chains thereby preventing E2F1 degradation in the nuclei. Downregulation of USP11 increases E2F1 ubiquitination and reduces E2F1 stability and protein levels, thereby decreasing Peg10 mRNA levels. Physiologically, USP11 depletion suppresses cell proliferation and wound healing in lung epithelial cells, and these effects are reversed by E2F1 and PEG10 overexpression. Thus, our study reveals a new molecular model that phosphorylation promotes substrate stability through increasing its association with a deubiquitinating enzyme. The data suggest that GSK3β and USP11 act in concert to modulate E2F1 abundance and PEG10 expression in lung epithelial cells to affect cell wound healing. This study provides new therapeutic targets to lessen lung injury by improving lung epithelial cell repair and remodeling after injury.

E2F1 interactions with hHR23A inhibit its degradation and promote DNA repair.

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is a major mechanism for removal of DNA lesions induced by exposure to UV radiation in the epidermis. Recognition of damaged DNA sites is the initial step in their repair, and requires multiprotein complexes that contain XPC and hHR23 proteins, or their orthologues. A variety of transcription factors are also involved in NER, including E2F1. In epidermal keratinocytes, UV exposure induces E2F1 phosphorylation, which allows it to recruit various NER factors to sites of DNA damage. However, the relationship between E2F1 and hHR23 proteins vis-à-vis NER has remained unexplored. We now show that E2F1 and hHR23 proteins can interact, and this interaction stabilizes E2F1, inhibiting its proteasomal degradation. Reciprocally, E2F1 regulates hHR23A subcellular localization, recruiting it to sites of DNA photodamage. As a result, E2F1 and hHR23A enhance DNA repair following exposure to UV radiation, contributing to genomic stability in the epidermis.

NANOG Metabolically Reprograms Tumor-Initiating Stem-like Cells through Tumorigenic Changes in Oxidative Phosphorylation and Fatty Acid Metabolism

Stem cell markers, including NANOG, have been implicated in various cancers; however, the functional contribution of NANOG to cancer pathogenesis has remained unclear. Here, we show that NANOG is induced by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling via phosphorylation of E2F1 and that downregulation of Nanog slows down hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progression induced by alcohol western diet and hepatitis C virus protein in mice. NANOG ChIP-seq analyses reveal that NANOG regulates the expression of genes involved in mitochondrial metabolic pathways required to maintain tumor-initiating stem-like cells (TICs). NANOG represses mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) genes, as well as ROS generation, and activates fatty acid oxidation (FAO) to support TIC self-renewal and drug resistance. Restoration of OXPHOS activity and inhibition of FAO renders TICs susceptible to a standard care chemotherapy drug for HCC, sorafenib. This study provides insights into the mechanisms of NANOG-mediated generation of TICs, tumorigenesis, and chemoresistance through reprogramming of mitochondrial metabolism.

Abstract 4794: NANOG represses mitochondrial energy production and promotes fatty acid synthesis to promote self-renewal in tumor-initiating cells

Abstract Stem cell markers such as Nanog have been implicated in various cancer, but whether they are functionally contributing to cancer pathogenesis has remained unclear. We previously reported that Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) signaling regulated NANOG expression in liver cancers (Chen et al., J. Clin. Inv., 2013). Here, we determined novel targets of NANOG in CD133+CD49f+ tumor-initiating cells (TICs) from patient and mouse models of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using genome-wide NANOG-binding site analysis (ChIP-seq). Silencing NANOG inhibits tumor development in HCC mouse models and genesis of TICs as alcohol/obesity-associated increase of serum bacterial products activates TLR4 signaling. To determine novel targets of NANOG in TICs isolated from several HCC models, ChIP-seq in TICs was performed. NANOG binds genes of oxidative phosphorylation and β-oxidation in mitochondria. Silencing NANOG promotes oxidative phosphorylation and β-oxidation, indicating that NANOG is a suppressor of mitochondria-mediated energy production. We identified the TLR4-NANOG oncogenic pathway in the genesis of TICs and liver tumor in HCC mouse models, including alcohol/high-fat-diet-fed hepatitis C virus (HCV) transgenic mice, DEN/phenobarbtal-treated and Spnb2+/- mice. We identified the stimulation of TLR4 transactivates Nanog through E2F1 phosphorylation at serine residues 332/336 and generates TICs, leading to development of liver tumors. Metabolomic analysis demonstrates metabolic reprogramming in TICs through NANOG. Reduction of NANOG expression resulted in an improved cellular energy balance, including reduction of the glycolysis pathway, increased fatty acid consumption and greater uptake of amino acids. The improved energy status is linked to a shift away from glycolysis and a greater reliance on fatty acid β-oxidation and amino acid anaplerosis. Taken together, these results suggest that NANOG-mediated metabolic reprogramming through suppression of mitochondria function in both experimental and clinical HCC downstream of TLR4/NANOG generates TICs and drives liver tumorigenesis. Citation Format: Chia-Lin Chen, Vasu Punj, Linda Sher, Lydia Petrovic, Keigo Machida. NANOG represses mitochondrial energy production and promotes fatty acid synthesis to promote self-renewal in tumor-initiating cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 4794. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-4794

E2F1 responds to ultraviolet radiation by directly stimulating DNA repair and suppressing carcinogenesis.

In response to DNA damage, the E2F1 transcription factor is phosphorylated at serine 31 (serine 29 in mouse) by the ATM or ATR kinases, which promotes E2F1 protein stabilization. Phosphorylation of E2F1 also leads to the recruitment of E2F1 to sites of DNA damage, where it functions to enhance DNA repair. To study the role of this E2F1 phosphorylation event in vivo, a knock-in mouse model was generated, in which serine 29 was mutated to alanine. The S29A mutation impairs E2F1 stabilization in response to ultraviolet (UV) radiation and doxorubicin treatment, but has little effect on the expression of E2F target genes. The apoptotic and proliferative responses to acute UV radiation exposure are also similar between wild-type and E2f1(S29A/) (S29A) mice. As expected, the S29A mutation prevents E2F1 association with damaged DNA and reduces DNA repair efficiency. Moreover, E2f1(S29A/) (S29A) mice display increased sensitivity to UV-induced skin carcinogenesis. This knock-in mouse model thus links the ability of E2F1 to directly promote DNA repair with the suppression of tumor development.

Highlights from Recent Cancer Literature

Highlights from Recent Cancer Literature

Senescence Sensitivity of Breast Cancer Cells Is Defined by Positive Feedback Loop between CIP2A and E2F1

Senescence induction contributes to cancer therapy responses and is crucial for p53-mediated tumor suppression. However, whether p53 inactivation actively suppresses senescence induction has been unclear. Here, we show that E2F1 overexpression, due to p53 or p21 inactivation, promotes expression of human oncoprotein CIP2A, which in turn, by inhibiting PP2A activity, increases stabilizing serine 364 phosphorylation of E2F1. Several lines of evidence show that increased activity of E2F1-CIP2A feedback renders breast cancer cells resistant to senescence induction. Importantly, mammary tumorigenesis is impaired in a CIP2A-deficient mouse model, and CIP2A-deficient tumors display markers of senescence induction. Moreover, high CIP2A expression predicts for poor prognosis in a subgroup of patients with breast cancer treated with senescence-inducing chemotherapy. Together, these results implicate the E2F1-CIP2A feedback loop as a key determinant of breast cancer cell sensitivity to senescence induction. This feedback loop also constitutes a promising prosenescence target for therapy of cancers with an inactivated p53-p21 pathway. It has been recently realized that most currently used chemotherapies exert their therapeutic effect at least partly by induction of terminal cell arrest, senescence. However, the mechanisms by which cell-intrinsic senescence sensitivity is determined are poorly understood. Results of this study identify the E2F1-CIP2A positive feedback loop as a key determinant of breast cancer cell sensitivity to senescence and growth arrest induction. Our data also indicate that this newly characterized interplay between 2 frequently overexpressed oncoproteins constitutes a promising prosenescence target for therapy of cancers with inactivated p53 and p21. Finally, these results may also facilitate novel stratification strategies for selection of patients to receive senescence-inducing cancer therapies.

The p38 MAPK–MK2 Axis Regulates E2F1 and FOXM1 Expression after Epirubicin Treatment

E2F1 is responsible for the regulation of FOXM1 expression, which plays a key role in epirubicin resistance. Here, we examined the role and regulation of E2F1 in response to epirubicin in cancer cells. We first showed that E2F1 plays a key role in promoting FOXM1 expression, cell survival, and epirubicin resistance as its depletion by siRNA attenuated FOXM1 induction and cell viability in response to epirubicin. We also found that the p38-MAPK activity mirrors the expression patterns of E2F1 and FOXM1 in both epirubicin-sensitive and -resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cells, suggesting that p38 has a role in regulating E2F1 expression and epirubicin resistance. Consistently, studies using pharmacologic inhibitors, siRNA knockdown, and knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEF) revealed that p38 mediates the E2F1 induction by epirubicin and that the induction of E2F1 by p38 is, in turn, mediated through its downstream kinase MK2 [mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-activated protein kinase 2; MAPKAPK2]. In agreement, in vitro phosphorylation assays showed that MK2 can directly phosphorylate E2F1 at Ser-364. Transfection assays also showed that E2F1 phosphorylation at Ser-364 participates in its induction by epirubicin but also suggests that other phosphorylation events are also involved. In addition, the p38-MK2 axis can also limit c-jun-NH(2)-kinase (JNK) induction by epirubicin and, notably, JNK represses FOXM1 expression. Collectively, these findings underscore the importance of p38-MK2 signaling in the control of E2F1 and FOXM1 expression as well as epirubicin sensitivity.

DNA damage signals through differentially modified E2F1 molecules to induce apoptosis.

E2F transcription can lead to cell proliferation or apoptosis, indicating that E2Fs control opposing functions. In a similar manner, DNA double-strand breaks can signal to induce cell cycle arrest or apoptosis. Specifically, pRB is activated following DNA damage, allowing it to bind to E2Fs and block transcription at cell cycle promoters; however, E2F1 is simultaneously activated, leading to transcription at proapoptotic promoters. We examined this paradoxical control of E2F transcription by studying how E2F1's interaction with pRB is regulated following DNA damage. Our work reveals that DNA damage signals create multiple forms of E2F1 that contain mutually exclusive posttranslational modifications. Specifically, E2F1 phospho-serine 364 is found only in complex with pRB, while E2F1 phosphorylation at serine 31 and acetylation function to create a pRB-free form of E2F1. Both pRB-bound and pRB-free modifications on E2F1 are essential for the activation of TA-p73 and the maximal induction of apoptosis. Chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated that E2F1 phosphorylated on serine 364 is also present at proapoptotic gene promoters during the induction of apoptosis. This indicates that distinct populations of E2F1 are organized in response to DNA damage signaling. Surprisingly, these complexes act in parallel to activate transcription of proapoptotic genes. Our data suggest that DNA damage signals alter pRB and E2F1 to engage them in functions leading to apoptotic induction that are distinct from pRB-E2F regulation in cell cycle control.

Abstract 5002: Posttranslational modification of E2F1 during melanoma progression

Abstract Melanoma, the malignant tumor of melanocytes, accounts for approximately 78% of skin cancer related deaths. No current treatment significantly enhances disease-free survival once distant metastases have established. To facilitate the development of effective treatment strategies, it is imperative that we obtain a better understanding of the biology of melanoma cells as they progress through the various stages of disease. Previous studies have shown that E2F1, a transcription factor, is over-expressed in melanoma cells. Interaction between E2Fs and tumor suppressor, Rb is essential for regulation of cell cycle progression. E2F1 is known to be involved in other important biological processes, including DNA damage, DNA repair, differentiation, development, autophagy and apoptosis. However, the mechanism through which E2F1 is elevated in melanoma remains unknown. In normal cells in late S phase, E2F1 is recognized by the E3 ligase p45 SKP2, undergoes ubiquitination and is finally degraded in 26S proteasome. Since multiple post-translational modifications have been reported to affect the stability and functions of E2F1, we have hypothesized that during melanoma progression E2F1 fails to undergo degradation and this failure is due to post-translational modification of E2F1. In this study we have used melanoma cells of increasing disease progression. Our results show that primary melanoma cells have high level of E2F1 message and protein. We also found that E2F1 protein levels are not tightly regulated during cell cycle progression. Levels of E2F1 remain constantly high during cell cycle progression in the less metastatic melanoma cells. Consistent with these results, phosphorylation of E2F1 at Serine 337 is almost unchanged during cell cycle progression in the less metastatic melanoma cells. These results taken together suggest that this post-translational modification site may play an important role in stabilization of E2F1 in the primary melanoma cells that represent the radial and vertical growth phases of melanoma. Since modifications usually induce conformational changes, which may affect any following modifications, it is necessary to study the crosstalk among different modifications like acetylation and phosphorylation. The modifications towards the same direction may generate a specific array of modifications that can induce markedly stronger functional effects compared with those produced by the sum of single modifications. Therefore, it is intriguing to detect the coordination of different modifications and determine if there is such a modification array that regulates the stabilization and degradation of E2F1 resulting in the elevated E2F1 levels in melanoma cells. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5002. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5002

Study of the in vivo phosphorylation of E2F1 on Ser403

Multiple E2F1 phosphorylation sites have been described as targets of different kinases, yet their in vivo implication is uncertain. We previously reported that GSK3β is able to phosphorylate E2F1 in vitro at Ser403 and Ser433. Recently, it has been shown that both residues are also direct targets of p38 MAP kinase. In order to determine whether Ser403 phosphorylation occurs in vivo and to elucidate its role in E2F1 transcription activity, we developed a phospho-E2F1(Ser403) antibody for use in in vivo detection studies. Our results demonstrate that endogenous E2F1 is phosphorylated in vivo on Ser403, however neither GSK3β nor p38 MAP kinase are responsible for this event. E2F1 phosphorylation on Ser403 is induced after treatment with doxorubicin in a dose response manner. The transcriptional response of E2F1 to doxorubicin is lower in an E2F1 Ser/Ala403 mutated construct relative to the wild type, suggesting a role for Ser403 phosphorylation in DNA damage conditions. Comparative study between the expression of the bcl2 gene family induced by the wild type and E2F1 Ser/Ala403 mutant revealed a statistically different pattern between both conditions. These results suggest that phosphorylation of Ser403 could influence the selection and regulation of E2F1 target genes.

E2F-1 binding affinity for pRb is not the only determinant of the E2F-1 activity

E2F-1 is the major cellular target of pRB and is regulated by pRB during cell proliferation. Interaction between pRB and E2F-1 is dependent on the phosphorylation status of pRB. Despite the fact that E2F-1 and pRB have antagonistic activities when they are overexpressed, the role of the E2F-1-pRB interaction in cell growth largely remains unknown. Ideally, it would be better to study the properties of a pRB mutant that fails to bind to E2F, but retains all other activities. To date, no pRB mutation has been characterized in sufficient detail to show that it specifically eliminates E2F binding but leaves other interactions intact. An alternative approach to this issue is to ask whether mutations that change E2F proteins binding affinity to pRB are sufficient to change cell growth in aspect of cell cycle and tumor formation. Therefore, we used the E2F-1 mutants including E2F-1/S332-7A, E2F-1/S375A, E2F-1/S403A, E2F-1/Y411A and E2F-1/L132Q that have different binding affinities for pRB to better understand the roles of the E2F-1 phosphorylation and E2F-1-pRB interaction in the cell cycle, as well as in transformation and gene expression. Data presented in this study suggests that in vivo phosphorylation at amino acids 332-337, 375 and 403 is important for the E2F-1 and pRB interaction in vivo. However, although E2F-1 mutants 332-7, 375 and 403 showed similar binding affinity to pRB, they showed different characteristics in transformation efficiency, G(0) accumulation, and target gene experiments.

Preclinical and clinical development of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor flavopiridol.

Flavopiridol is the first potent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (cdks) to reach clinical trial. In the majority of solid tumor cell lines and xenografts, flavopiridol induces cell cycle arrest and tumor growth inhibition. This is reflected in clinical outcomes: across multiple Phase II trials there are subsets of patients with prolonged stable disease, although few responses have been observed. Flavopiridol displays sequence-dependent cytotoxic synergy with chemotherapy agents. These effects are most marked when chemotherapy precedes flavopiridol. In the case of DNA-damaging agents that impose S-phase delay, flavopiridol-mediated cdk inhibition disrupts the phosphorylation of E2F-1, leading to inappropriate persistence of its activity, inducing apoptotic pathways. This mechanism has been exploited in a Phase I trial of sequential gemcitabine and flavopiridol that has produced promising results. Flavopiridol is also synergistic with taxanes. Inhibition of cyclin B-cdk1 by flavopiridol accelerates exit from an abnormal mitosis associated with taxane-induced cell death and reduces the phosphorylation of survivin, preventing its stabilization and the cellular protection it affords after taxane exposure. The sequential combination of docetaxel and flavopiridol has been investigated in a Phase I trial in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, and a randomized Phase II study is under way. Initial schedules of flavopiridol used prolonged continuous infusions that produced nanomolar levels of drug thought to be capable of achieving cdk inhibition based on results in tumor cell lines. Recently, it has been discovered that micromolar concentrations are likely to be more effective, and shorter infusions that achieve a higher C(max) have now been adopted. Loading followed by maintenance infusions are also under development, designed to achieve sustained micromolar drug levels. Clinical trials remain complicated by the absence of pharmacodynamic end points to confirm target inhibition.

Regulation of E2F1 by BRCT domain-containing protein TopBP1.

The E2F transcription factor integrates cellular signals and coordinates cell cycle progression. Our prior studies demonstrated selective induction and stabilization of E2F1 through ATM-dependent phosphorylation in response to DNA damage. Here we report that DNA topoisomerase IIbeta binding protein 1 (TopBP1) regulates E2F1 during DNA damage. TopBP1 contains eight BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) motifs and upon DNA damage is recruited to stalled replication forks, where it participates in a DNA damage checkpoint. Here we demonstrated an interaction between TopBP1 and E2F1. The interaction depended on the amino terminus of E2F1 and the sixth BRCT domain of TopBP1. It was specific to E2F1 and was not observed in E2F2, E2F3, or E2F4. This interaction was induced by DNA damage and phosphorylation of E2F1 by ATM. Through this interaction, TopBP1 repressed multiple activities of E2F1, including transcriptional activity, induction of S-phase entry, and apoptosis. Furthermore, TopBP1 relocalized E2F1 from diffuse nuclear distribution to discrete punctate nuclear foci, where E2F1 colocalized with TopBP1 and BRCA1. Thus, the specific interaction between TopBP1 and E2F1 during DNA damage inhibits the known E2F1 activities but recruits E2F1 to a BRCA1-containing repair complex, suggesting a direct role of E2F1 in DNA damage checkpoint/repair at stalled replication forks.

Residues phosphorylated by TFIIH are required for E2F-1 degradation during S-phase.

The transcription factor E2F-1 plays a key role in regulating cell cycle progression. Accordingly, E2F-1 activity is itself tightly controlled by a series of transcriptional and post-transcriptional events. Here we show that the E2F-1 activation domain interacts with a kinase activity which phosphorylates two sites, Ser403 and Thr433, within the activation domain. We demonstrate that TFIIH is responsible for the E2F-1 phosphorylation observed in cell extracts and that endogenous E2F-1 interacts in vivo with p62, a component of TFIIH, during S phase. When the two phosphorylation sites in E2F-1 are mutated to alanine, the stability of the E2F-1 activation domain is greatly increased. These results suggest that TFIIH-mediated phosphorylation of E2F-1 plays a role in triggering E2F-1 degradation during S phase.

Cyclin A/CDK2 binds directly to E2F-1 and inhibits the DNA-binding activity of E2F-1/DP-1 by phosphorylation.

E2F-1, a member of the E2F transcription factor family, contributes to the regulation of the G1-to-S phase transition in higher eukaryotic cells. E2F-1 forms a heterodimer with DP-1 and binds to several cell cycle regulatory proteins, including the retinoblastoma family (RB, p107, p130) and cyclin A/CDK2 complexes. We have analyzed E2F-1 phosphorylation and its interaction with cyclin A/CDK2 complexes both in vivo and in vitro. In vitro, E2F-1 formed a stable complex with cyclin A/CDK2 but not with either subunit alone. DP-1 did not interact with cyclin A, CDK2, or the cyclin A/CDK2 complex. While the complex of cyclin A/CDK2 was required for stable complex formation with E2F-1, the kinase-active form of CDK2 was not required. However, E2F-1 was phosphorylated by cyclin A/CDK2 in vitro and was phosphorylated in vivo in HeLa cells. Two-dimensional tryptic phosphopeptide mapping studies demonstrated an overlap in the phosphopeptides derived from E2F-1 labeled in vitro and in vivo, indicating that cyclin A/CDK2 may be responsible for the majority of E2F-1 phosphorylation in vivo. Furthermore, an active DNA-binding complex could be reconstituted from purified E2F-1/DP-1 and cyclin A/CDK2. Binding studies conducted both in vitro and in vivo demonstrated that the cyclin A/CDK2-binding region resided within the N-terminal 124 amino acids of E2F-1. Because the stable association of E2F-1 with cyclin A/CDK2 in vitro and in vivo did not require a DP-1- or RB-binding domain and because the interactions could be reconstituted from purified components in vitro, we conclude that the interactions between cyclin A/CDK2 and E2F-1 are direct. Finally, we report that the DNA-binding activity of the E2F-1/DP-1 complex is inhibited following phosphorylation by cyclin A/CDK2.