Tissue water content has been observed to influence ultrasonic atomization efficiency, which raises questions regarding ex vivo tissue storage time and viability. Here, we investigate the influence of tissue preservation solutions on acoustic properties and atomization efficiency. Samples from ten bovine livers were immediately submerged in phosphate-buffered saline (PBSaline), phosphate-buffered sucrose (PBSucrose), phosphate-buffered raffinose (PBRaffinose), or ViaSpan® clinical organ transplantation solution; no solution was also tested. Acoustic attenuation, sound speed, water content, and atomization efficiency were evaluated on either day 1 or day 2. For atomization efficiency, samples were partially submerged in water with the liver-air interface aligned with a 2-MHz focused transducer operating with 10-ms pulses at 1 Hz and peak pressures of 65/-16 MPa. Overall, no difference in atomization efficiency was observed. Water content in tissue was 66–78%, with PBSaline showing a significant increase between days (p = 0.0013). Only tissues in no solution showed a significant difference between days in acoustic attenuation (p = 0.0003). Sound speed measurements had more variation with only ViaSpan and PBSucrose showing no significant differences. As ViaSpan and PBSurcrose showed the most similarities in the tested acoustic properties, PBSurcose may be a low-cost alternative to the clinical ViaSpan solution for preserving ex vivo tissues. [Work supported by NIH DK043881 and EB017857.]Tissue water content has been observed to influence ultrasonic atomization efficiency, which raises questions regarding ex vivo tissue storage time and viability. Here, we investigate the influence of tissue preservation solutions on acoustic properties and atomization efficiency. Samples from ten bovine livers were immediately submerged in phosphate-buffered saline (PBSaline), phosphate-buffered sucrose (PBSucrose), phosphate-buffered raffinose (PBRaffinose), or ViaSpan® clinical organ transplantation solution; no solution was also tested. Acoustic attenuation, sound speed, water content, and atomization efficiency were evaluated on either day 1 or day 2. For atomization efficiency, samples were partially submerged in water with the liver-air interface aligned with a 2-MHz focused transducer operating with 10-ms pulses at 1 Hz and peak pressures of 65/-16 MPa. Overall, no difference in atomization efficiency was observed. Water content in tissue was 66–78%, with PBSaline showing a significant increase be...