Phase-3 Study Research Articles

Long-Term Efficacy and Tolerability of an Emollient Containing Glycerol and Paraffin for Moderate-to-Severe Uremic Xerosis: A Randomized Phase3 Study.

There is an unmet need for effective topical therapies for patients with uremic xerosis and chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP). The long-term efficacy and tolerability of an emollient containing glycerol 15% and paraffin 10% (V0034CR) was evaluated in a phase3 study. In this randomized, double-blind, two-parallel group, vehicle-controlled study, patients with moderate-to-severe uremic xerosis were randomized to once-daily application of V0034CR or vehicle control for 28days (periodI). This was followed by a treatment-free period of ≤ 21days (periodII), then all patients received open-label treatment with V0034CR for ≥ 84days (periodIII). Outcomes included treatment response at the end of periodI (El Gammal's xerosis severity score), instrumental measures of scaling (D-Squame technique), time to relapse during periodII, rate of recurrence during periodIII, pruritus severity over time, patient acceptability, and adverse events (AEs). The intent-to-treat population comprised 235 patients randomized to V0034CR (n = 118) or vehicle control (n = 117) during periodI. Treatment response at the end of periodI was achieved by 71 patients (60.2%) in the V0034CR group versus 48 (41.0%) with vehicle control (p = 0.0041). This coincided with greater reductions in the total surface area of squames (p = 0.001 vs vehicle control). Xerosis relapsed progressively without treatment in periodII; however, remission was durable under maintenance therapy in periodIII. Improvements in pruritus severity were comparable between V0034CR and vehicle control, suggesting that the antipruritic effect of V0034CR was mainly exerted by its oil-in-water emulsion base. V0034CR had high patient acceptability and was well tolerated; the most common treatment-related AEs were irritation or erythema (2.1%), exacerbated pruritus (1.3%), and vesicles at the application site (0.9%). These data support the use of V0034CR, with its hydrating and occlusive properties, for the long-term management of patients with moderate-to-severe uremic xerosis and CKD-aP. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01084148; EudraCT number 2006-002201-31.

A Phase3, Open-Label, Single-Arm Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of Triptorelin 6-Month Formulation in Chinese Children with Central Precocious Puberty.

This phase3 study assessed the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the 6-month prolonged release (PR) formulation in Chinese children with central precocious puberty (CPP). In this open-label study (NCT05029622), Chinese children (girls < 9years, boys < 10years) received two doses of triptorelin pamoate 22.5mg (day1 and month6). Primary endpoint was the proportion at month6 with luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression (stimulated peak LH ≤ 5IU/L after gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulation). Secondary endpoints included safety assessments, hormone level changes, and clinical parameters from baseline. Overall, 66 children completed the study (93.9% girls; median age 8.0 [range 5-9] years). At month6, all patients had LH suppression; this was maintained at month12 in 98.5% of patients. Mean basal and peak LH and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were suppressed throughout follow-up. All patients at months3 to 12had sex hormone suppression to prepubertal levels. Stable or reduced breast development was seen for 98.4% and 93.5% of girls at month6 and 12, respectively; all boys had regression or stable genital development until month12. Compared with baseline (9.82cm/year), mean growth velocity was 5.88cm/year at month6 and 5.17cm/year at month12. Mean bone age/chronological age ratio decreased from 1.27 at baseline to 1.23 and 1.21 at month6 and 12, respectively. In girls, 64.5% showed decreased uterine length at month6 and 12 versus baseline, while 75.0% of boys showed stable testicular volume versus baseline. Thirteen patients (19.7%) had 22 drug-related treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs); no grade ≥ 3 TEAEs were reported. The efficacy and safety profile of triptorelin 6-month PR in Chinese children with CPP was consistent with data previously reported in non-Chinese children with CPP, supporting this as a viable treatment option for Chinese children with CPP. Trial registration:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05029622.

Usefulness of Mirogabalin in Central Neuropathic Pain After Stroke: Post Hoc Analysis of a Phase3 Study by Stroke Type and Location.

Central post-stroke pain (CPSP) is a common type of central neuropathic pain (CNeP) that can occur following the onset of stroke. The oral gabapentinoid mirogabalin besylate (mirogabalin) is a selective α2δ ligand that is effective for the treatment of CNeP, including CPSP. However, it is unknown whether the analgesic effect of mirogabalin on CPSP varies in patients with different background factors. This was a post hoc subgroup analysis of a multinational, open-label, long-term phase3 study of mirogabalin for the treatment of CNeP conducted between March 2019 and December 2020. Data from patients with CPSP were stratified by type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), stroke location (thalamus, putamen, brainstem, or other), presence/absence of motor weakness, median time since stroke (≥ 59 or < 59months), and median duration of CPSP (≥ 55.5 or < 55.5months). Efficacy was assessed with the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were recorded. This subanalysis included all 94 patients with CPSP from the phase3 study; all were Japanese, and the mean age was 65.3years. The least squares mean change [95% confidence interval] in SF-MPQ visual analog scale (VAS) score from baseline at week52 (last observation carried forward) was - 17.0 [- 22.1, - 11.9] mm. Among the subgroups, least squares mean changes in SF-MPQ VAS scores were not different. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate; severe TEAEs occurred in six patients (6.4%). Somnolence (25.5%), peripheral edema (13.8%), dizziness (11.7%), and weight gain (6.4%) were the most common ADRs, and the types and frequencies of ADRs were similar among subgroups. Mirogabalin was generally effective and well tolerated in patients with CPSP, regardless of background factors such as stroke type or location, presence/absence of motor weakness, time since stroke, and duration of CPSP. Trial registration number NCT03901352.

Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant insulin aspart (BioGenomics Limited) and NovoRapid® (Novo Nordisk) in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase-3 study

Background and purpose: To compare the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of recombinant insulin aspart 100 U/mL manufactured by BioGenomics Limited (BGL-ASP) with innovator NovoRapid® in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients (T2 DM). Experimental approach: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study in T2 DM patients, on premix human insulin therapy ± oral anti-diabetics. Besides self-monitored plasma glucose, fasting and post-prandial plasma glucose (FPG and PPG) were tested at baseline, week 12, and week 24. Anti-insulin aspart antibodies measured immunogenicity at 12 and 24 weeks. Findings/Results: 160 patients out of 320 patients randomly received BGL-ASP and the remaining patients received NovoRapid®. The changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) from baseline to weeks 12 and 24 for the BGL-ASP group were -0.8 ± 0.83 and -0.8 ± 0.81, respectively, while for the NovoRapid®group was -0.8 ± 1.01 and -0.9 ± 0.89, respectively. Changes in FPG and PPG were comparable between the treatment groups after 12 weeks and 24 weeks. The incidence of detectable antibodies at baseline, weeks 12, and 24 were comparable between treatment groups. Eighteen (11.3%) patients in the BGL-ASP group and 23 (14.4%) in the NovoRapid®group reported adverse events. Conclusion and implications: BGL-ASP and NovoRapid®were comparable and equally effective in lowering HbA1c, FPG, and PPG levels, with similar immunogenicity and safety profiles.

Rapid and Sustained Effect of Ixekizumab on Patient Global, Spinal Pain, Stiffness, and Fatigue in Chinese Patients with Radiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis.

Ixekizumab, an interleukin 17A (IL-17A) inhibitor, has demonstrated rapid and sustained improvement in the signs and symptoms in patients with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (r-axSpA) in global and Chinese populations. We studied the effect of ixekizumab on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) (including patient global, spinal pain, stiffness, and fatigue) and overall health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of ixekizumab in the phase3 study in China. In this Chinese phase3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, patients with r-axSpA were randomized (1:1) to receive ixekizumab 80mg every 4weeks (IXEQ4W; starting dose 160mg) or placebo for 16weeks. At week16, patients receiving placebo were switched to IXEQ4W, and those receiving IXEQ4W continued, until week52. Data for patient global, spinal pain, spinal pain at night, stiffness, and fatigue were collected through week52. Minimally clinical important differences (MCIDs) were determined for spinal pain and spinal pain at night. The subgroup analyses by baseline disease duration since diagnosis and baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) level were conducted post hoc. Compared with placebo, patients treated with IXEQ4W reported significantly greater improvement with a rapid onset in changes from baseline of PROs (patient global, spinal pain, spinal pain at night, stiffness, and fatigue) through week16. Improvements were maintained through week52. A similar trend of improvement was also observed in MCID response in spinal pain and spinal pain at night. The improvement in overall HRQoL was supported by EQ-5D-5L assessment. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that IXEQ4W provided significantly greater efficacy at week16 compared with placebo, irrespective of baseline disease duration or baseline CRP level. IXEQ4W provided rapid and sustained improvement in clinically relevant PROs and overall HRQoL through 1-year treatment in Chinese patients with r-axSpA. Regardless of the baseline disease duration or baseline CRP level, consistent efficacy was observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04285229.

The Impact of Lebrikizumab on Vaccine-Induced Immune Responses: Results from a Phase3 Study in Adult Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis.

Lebrikizumab, a high-affinity IgG4 monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin-13 with high binding affinity and slow dissociation rate, prevents the formation of the interleukin-4Rα/interleukin-13Rα1heterodimer receptor signaling complex. Here we report the impact of lebrikizumab on responses to two non-live vaccines in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). ADopt-VA (NCT04626297) was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, 16-week, phase3 randomized study to assess the impact of lebrikizumab treatment on non-live vaccine immune responses, and efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab compared with placebo. Eligible patients included adults from 18 to 55years of age with moderate-to-severe chronic AD who were randomly assigned 1:1 to lebrikizumab 250mg every 2weeks or placebo and stratified according to disease severity. The primary endpoints were the development of a booster response to tetanus toxoid and a positive antibody response to meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MCV), 4weeks after administration of the corresponding vaccine. At week16, 73.6% of patients in the lebrikizumab group (n = 78/106) achieved Tdap booster response compared with 73.4% of patients in the placebo group (n = 58/79). MCV vaccine response was observed in 86.9% of patients in the lebrikizumab group (n = 86/99) and 75.0% of patients in the placebo group (n = 60/80). At week16, IGA0,1 with ≥ 2-point improvement from baseline was achieved by 40.6% (n = 51/125) of patients treated with lebrikizumab and 18.9% (n = 23/122) of patients who received placebo (p < 0.001). There was a higher proportion of patients achieving EASI75 at week16 in the lebrikizumab-treated patients (58.0%, n = 72/125) compared with placebo (32.7%, n = 40/122, p < 0.001). Treatment with lebrikizumab did not impact response to non-live vaccines Tdap and MCV in this study. Lebrikizumab treatment had a significant degree of efficacy compared to placebo across multiple endpoints. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT04626297.

Randomized, Open-Label Phase3 Study Evaluating Immunogenicity, Safety, and Reactogenicity of RSVPreF3 OA Coadministered with FLU-QIV-HD in Adults Aged ≥ 65.

Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and influenza pose major disease burdens in older adults due to an aging immune system and comorbidities; seasonal overlap exists between these infections. In 2023, the RSV prefusion protein F3 older adult (RSVPreF3 OA) vaccine was first approved in the USA as a single dose for prevention of lower respiratory tract disease due to RSV in adults aged ≥ 60years. The vaccine has since been approved in the European Union and elsewhere. RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV-HD could be coadministered if immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity are not affected. This open-label, randomized (1:1), controlled, phase3 study in 1029 adults aged ≥ 65years in the USA evaluated the immunogenicity (up to 1month after last vaccine dose) and safety (up to 6months after last vaccine dose) of RSVPreF3 OA coadministered with FLU-QIV-HD (co-ad group) versus FLU-QIV-HD alone followed by RSVPreF3 OA at a separate visit 1month later (control group). Non-inferiority criterion was defined as an upper limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval of the geometric mean titer (GMT) group ratio (control/co-ad) ≤ 1.5. Secondary endpoints included safety and reactogenicity. Proportions of participants across age categories between groups and proportions of male (50.4%) and female (49.6%) participants were well balanced; most participants were white (68.7%). Group GMT ratios for RSV-A neutralizing titers, hemagglutination inhibition titers for four influenza vaccine strains, and RSV-B neutralizing titers were non-inferior in the co-ad group versus the control group. No clinically meaningful differences in local or systemic solicited and unsolicited adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and potential immune-mediated diseases were identified. The most common solicited AEs in both groups were injection-site pain and myalgia. In adults aged ≥ 65years, coadministration of RSVPreF3 OA and FLU-QIV-HD was immunogenically non-inferior to the sequential administration of both vaccines 1month apart, and had clinically acceptable safety and reactogenicity profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT05559476.

Procedural characteristics, details on epicardial mapping-based lesion transmurality, and long-term success of posterior wall isolation with a pentaspline pulsed field ablation device

Abstract Background Achieving durable posterior wall isolation (PWI) with thermal-based energies is challenging, as reconnection rates have been reported to be up to 60%. Additionally, PWI can significantly increase the risk of collateral thermal damage to the esophagus. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a non-thermal energy source with a remarkable safety profile due to its selectivity to cardiac tissue. Additionally, PWI durability was reported to be 100% in a recent phase-3 study enrolling persistent AF patients undergoing PFA via the FarapulseTM system. Purpose To report procedural details, acute lesion transmurality, and long-term success of PWI via the FarapulseTMsystem. Methods Consecutive persistent AF patients undergoing first-time ablation with the FarapulseTM system at four different centres were prospectively enrolled. All patients received first-time pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and PWI. PFA was performed with either a 31mm or a 35mm device and an energy output of 2.0kV. At least 2 applications per position were delivered. Primary efficacy endpoint was freedom from any atrial tachyarrhythmia &amp;gt;30s after a 3month blanking period. PW lesion transmurality was assessed in a subpopulation of patients with an indication for hybrid AF ablation and left atrial appendage (LAA) clipping. The procedure was performed according to the following steps: 1) endocardial PVI plus PWI via the FarapulseTM system; 2) endocardial high-density mapping with RhythmiaTM plus Intellanav OrionTM; 3) thoracoscopy-assisted epicardial high-density mapping with Intellanav OrionTM 4) left atrial appendage clipping. Results 157 persistent AF patients (mean age: 62±11years; 75.5% males) were included. First-pass PVI was achieved in 100% of patients. On average, pulsed electric field applications for PWI were 16.3±2.4. Mean procedural time was 66±17min; left atrial dwelling and fluoroscopy times were 46±12min and 14±6min, respectively. SR restoration during PWI was observed in 8 (5.1%) cases. Minor and major periprocedural complications occurred in 2.5% (groin hematoma: 4pts) and 0.6% (diplopia with negative cerebral MRI) patients, respectively. During a mean follow-up of 353±58 days, arrhythmia-free survival was 78.3% (n=123). A redo ablation was performed in 23 patients, showing reconnection of 22.8% of PVs. Durable PWI was observed in 82.6% of patients. In the subpopulation of patients (n=3) undergoing hybrid ablation plus LAA clipping, thoracoscopy-guided epicardial mapping of the PW was performed between 57 and 72 minutes after the last endocardial PFA application. All patients showed transmural PWI (Figure1). Conclusions In a real-world multicenter registry, PWI by means of the FarapulseTM system was safe and feasible, contributing to approximately 80% success rate after 1 year. Endocardial PFA-based PWI led to 100% transmural lesions acutely, with a rate of reconnection &amp;lt;20% at redo procedures.

Model-Informed Clinical Development of Once-Every-6-Month Injection of Paliperidone Palmitate in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Pharmacometric Bridging Approach (Part I).

A model-informed drug development (MIDD) approach was implemented for paliperidone palmitate (PP) 6-month (PP6M) clinical development, using pharmacokinetics and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model-based simulations. PP6M pharmacokinetics were simulated by extending the PP 3-month (PP3M) pharmacokinetic model to account for increased injection volume, and hence dose. Contribution of the MIDD approach to the design of the pivotal PP6M phase-3 study (PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study, NCT03345342) investigating schizophrenia relapse rates was twofold: (1) PP6M dose selection, and (2) hypothesis generation that lower trough concentrations (Ctrough) associated with PP6M, relative to PP3M, were not associated with lower efficacy, which was to be evaluated in the phase-3 study. Moreover, accompanied by an intense sampling scheme to adequately characterize paliperidone pharmacokinetics and to elucidate the potential relationship between concentration and safety/efficacy, the bridging strategy eliminated the need for additional phase-1/phase-2 clinical studies. Using a MIDD bridging strategy, PP6M doses were selected that, compared with PP3M, were expected to have a similar range of exposures and a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile. Clinical data from PP6M/PP3M noninferiority study confirmed that PP6M, compared with PP3M, had a similar range of exposures (T'jollyn etal. in Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2024), as well as a noninferior relapse rate and safety profile (this manuscript). Consistency of the MIDD approach with observed clinical outcomes confirmed the hypothesis that lower Ctrough did not lead to increased relapse rates at the doses administered. Although higher paliperidone peak concentrations are achieved with corresponding doses of PP6M relative to PP3M in the phase-3 clinical study, types and incidences of treatment-related adverse events were comparable between PP6M and PP3M groups and no new safety concerns emerged for PP6M (Najarian etal. in Int J Neuropsychopharmacol 25(3):238-251, 2022).

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab for Active Psoriatic Arthritis: 100-Week Results from the Phase3 KEEPsAKE1 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) require treatment providing durable long-term efficacy in different disease domains as well as safety. We present 100-week efficacy and safety results of risankizumab in patients with active PsA and previous inadequate response/intolerance to ≥ 1 conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (csDMARD-IR). KEEPsAKE1 (NCT03675308) is a global phase3 study, including a 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled and ongoing open-label extension periods. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive risankizumab 150mg or placebo at baseline and weeks4 and 16. After week24, all patients received open-label risankizumab every 12weeks thereafter. Patients were evaluated through 100weeks. Endpoints included achieving ≥ 20% reduction in American College of Rheumatology criteria for symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (ACR20), minimal disease activity (MDA; defined as ≥ 5/7 criteria of low disease activity and extent), and other measures. Overall, 828/964 (85.9%) patients completed week100. For patients receiving continuous risankizumab, 57.3%, 70.6%, and 64.3% achieved ACR20 at weeks24, 52, and 100, respectively. For the placebo/risankizumab cohort, 33.5% achieved ACR20 at week24 but increased after switching to active treatment at weeks52 (63.7%) and 100 (62.1%). In ACR20 responders at week52, 81.2% of both treatment cohorts maintained response at week100. MDA was achieved by 25.0%, 38.3%, and 38.2% of the continuous risankizumab cohort at weeks24, 52, and 100. In the placebo/risankizumab cohort, 10.2% achieved MDA at week24, increasing at weeks52 (28.0%) and 100 (35.2%). MDA response was maintained at week100 in week52 responders in the continuous risankizumab (75.5%) and placebo/risankizumab cohorts (78.2%). Similar trends were observed for other efficacy measures. Risankizumab was generally well tolerated through 100weeks. For patients with active PsA who are csDMARD-IR, risankizumab demonstrated durable long-term efficacy and was generally well tolerated, with a consistent long-term safety profile. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03675308.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management.

Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorder with overlapping features of myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, characterized by prominent monocytosis and an inherent risk for leukemic transformation (~15%-20% over 3-5 years). Newly revised diagnostic criteria include sustained (>3 months) peripheral blood (PB) monocytosis (≥0.5 × 109/L; monocytes ≥10% of leukocyte count), consistent bone marrow (BM) morphology, <20% BM or PB blasts (including promonocytes), and cytogenetic or molecular evidence of clonality. Cytogenetic abnormalities occur in ~30% of patients, while >95% harbor somatic mutations: TET2 (~60%), SRSF2 (~50%), ASXL1 (~40%), RAS pathway (~30%), and others. The presence of ASXL1 and DNMT3A mutations and absence of TET2 mutations negatively impact overall survival (ASXL1WT/TET2MT genotype being favorable). Several risk models serve similar purposes in identifying high-risk patients that are considered for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) earlier than later. Risk factors in the Mayo Molecular Model (MMM) include presence of truncating ASXL1 mutations, absolute monocyte count >10 × 109/L, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, platelet count <100 × 109/L, and the presence of circulating immature myeloid cells; the resulting 4-tiered risk categorization includes high (≥3 risk factors), intermediate-2 (2 risk factors), intermediate-1 (1 risk factor), and low (no risk factors); the corresponding median survivals were 16, 31, 59, and 97 months. CMML is also classified as being "myeloproliferative (MP-CMML)" or "myelodysplastic (MD-CMML)," based on the presence or absence of leukocyte count of ≥13 × 109/L. ASCT is the only treatment modality that secures cure or long-term survival and is appropriate for MMM high/intermediate-2 risk disease. Drug therapy is currently not disease-modifying and includes hydroxyurea and hypomethylating agents; a recent phase-3 study (DACOTA) comparing hydroxyurea and decitabine, in high-risk MP-CMML, showed similar overall survival at 23.1 versus 18.4 months, respectively, despite response rates being higher for decitabine (56% vs. 31%). These include systemic inflammatory autoimmune diseases, leukemia cutis and lysozyme-induced nephropathy; the latter requires close monitoring of renal function during leukocytosis and is a potential indication for cytoreductive therapy.

Relapse Rates With Paliperidone Palmitate in Adult Patients With Schizophrenia: Results for the 6-Month Formulation From an Open-label Extension Study Compared to Real-World Data for the 1-Month and 3-Month Formulations.

The 3 paliperidone palmitate (PP) long-acting injectable antipsychotic formulations, PP 1-month (PP1M), PP 3-month (PP3M), and PP 6-month (PP6M), have shown to reduce the risk of relapse in schizophrenia. The current phase-4 study constructed external comparator arms (ECAs) using real-world data for PP3M and PP1M and compared relapse prevention rates with PP6M from an open-label extension (OLE) study in adult patients with schizophrenia. PP6M data were derived from a single-arm, 24-month, OLE study (NCT04072575), which included patients with schizophrenia who completed a 12-month randomized, double-blind, noninferiority, phase-3 study (NCT03345342) without relapse. Patients in the PP3M and PP1M ECAs were identified from the IBM® MarketScan® Multistate Medicaid Database based on similar eligibility criteria as the PP6M cohort. A total of 178 patients were included in each cohort following propensity score matching. Most patients were men (>70%; mean age: 39-41 years). Time to relapse (primary analysis based on Kaplan-Meier estimates) was significantly delayed in the PP6M cohort (P<.001, log-rank test). The relapse rate was lower in the PP6M cohort (3.9%) vs PP3M (20.2%) and PP1M (29.8%) cohorts. Risk of relapse decreased significantly (P<.001) by 82% for PP6M vs PP3M (HR = 0.18 [95% CI = 0.08 to 0.40]), 89% for PP6M vs PP1M (HR = 0.11 [0.05 to 0.25]), and 35% for PP3M vs PP1M (HR = 0.65 [0.42 to 0.99]; P = .043). Sensitivity analysis confirmed findings from the primary analysis. Although the ECAs were matched to mimic the characteristics of the PP6M cohort, heterogeneity between the groups could exist due to factors including prior study participation, unmeasured confounders, variations in data capture and quality, and completeness of clinical information. In a clinical trial setting, PP6M significantly delayed time to relapse and demonstrated lower relapse rates compared with PP3M and PP1M treatments in real-world settings among adult patients with schizophrenia. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04072575; EudraCT number: 2018-004532-30.

Efficacy and Safety of Topical Tacrolimus Microemulsion Applied Twice Daily in Patients with Mild to Moderate Scalp Psoriasis.

Involvement of the scalp is common in psoriasis and severely affects the quality of life of those affected. It is difficult to treat and places special demands on the galenics of a drug formulation. Tacrolimus is a calcineurin inhibitor and is approved as an ointment formulation for the treatment of atopic dermatitis. The efficacy and safety of topically applied tacrolimus have also been studied and proven for psoriasis. However, no proprietary pharmaceutical product is currently approved for this indication. A multicenter, double-blind, vehicle-controlled phase3 study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 0.1% tacrolimus microemulsion when applied topically twice daily in 128 patients independentlyofsex with scalp psoriasis. The primary efficacy analysis showed a scalp Investigator Global Assessment (s-IGA) of 0 (absence of disease) or 1 (very mild disease) at 8weeks in 28.6% of subjects in the tacrolimus group, indicating a significantly better response (p = 0.0476, chi-square test) versus 12.7% of subjects in the placebo group (difference of 15.9%-points). The Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) improved over time and was more pronounced in the group treated with tacrolimus-containing microemulsion than in the placebo group, but showed no statistically significant difference after 8weeks of use (p = 0.193, ANCOVA). The safety analysis revealed no evidence of cutaneous side effects other than those known. Toxicologically relevant serum levels of tacrolimus could be excluded. The study data show that 0.1% tacrolimus microemulsion has good efficacy and safety in the treatment of scalp psoriasis.

Oleogel-S10 in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Case Series Evaluating the Impact on Wound Burden Over Two Years.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare, difficult-to-treat, inherited multisystem diseases affecting epithelial integrity. Impaired wound healing is central and can lead to serious clinical complications, deformities, and symptoms with a devastating impact on quality of life (QoL). Dressing changes and wound care are central to the management of EB. Recently Oleogel-S10 (also known as birch bark extract or birch triterpenes) was approved in Europe and the UK for treating EB wounds. This approval was based on data from the EASE phase3 study, which demonstrated Oleogel-S10 accelerated wound healing, reduced total wound burden, and decreased the frequency of dressing changes in patients with EB. A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted for up to 24months in 13 patients with EB treated with Oleogel-S10 through an early access programme in Colombia. Effectiveness was assessed by measuring body surface area percentage (BSAP) and total body wound burden (EBDASI). Tolerability and safety were monitored throughout. This is the first report to evaluate the effectiveness of Oleogel-S10 in clinical practice. The results showed a reduction in percentage of BSA affected, from a mean of 27.3% at baseline to 10.4% at 24-month follow-up, despite treatment interruptions. A reduction in EBDASI skin activity score of - 16.2 (24months) together with a reduced skin damage index score of - 15.4 (18months) was also observed. Physicians, patients, and caregivers perceived faster wound closure. Adherence with therapy by patients was good, and patients expressed satisfaction with treatment and reported improvements in self-esteem, productivity, and social interaction. Oleogel-S10 was well tolerated; however, two patients reported worsening wounds related to gauze adherence. Two deaths during treatment interruption were reported and was not considered related to Oleogel-S10. This study supports the effectiveness of Oleogel-S10 in a real-world scenario in a country with scarce resources for the treatment of EB.

P056 Improvements in Daytime Function Items of the Insomnia Severity Index Are Correlated with a Positive Impact of Treatment on the Patient Global Impression Insomnia Scale

Abstract Introduction Items 4-7 (daytime function [DF]) of the 7-item Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) can assess daytime impairment. In Study E2006-G000-303 (Study 303; NCT02952820), lemborexant (LEM), a dual-orexin receptor antagonist, was associated at 6 months (6mo) with both significant improvement in ISI-DF items and significantly more subjects reporting positive effects on sleep, as assessed by the Patient Global Impression–Insomnia version (PGI-I), versus placebo (PBO). This analysis looked at the correlation between ISI-DF improvement and patient ratings on the PGI-I. Methods Study 303 was a 12-month, randomized, double-blind PBO-controlled (first 6mo) phase-3 study in adults with insomnia disorder. Subjects were randomized to PBO, LEM 5mg or 10mg for 6mo (2nd 6mo not reported here). ISI items are rated from 0 (no problem) to 4 (very severe problem). ISI-DF includes sleep satisfaction, extent symptoms are noticeable to others, cause worry/distress, and interfere with daily function. On the PGI-I, subjects assess positive, neutral or negative treatment impact on falling asleep, overall benefit on sleep, and total sleep time. Results A total of 739 subjects completed the ISI and PGI-I and were included in these analyses. At 6mo in all treatment groups, there were significant correlations (all P&amp;lt;0.001) between improvement in both ISI-DF items and PGI-I ratings regarding falling asleep, overall benefit on sleep, and total sleep time. Discussion These data suggest that the PGI-I may be a useful, quick tool to use in clinical practice, since an improvement in its score reflects improvements in daytime function. Sponsor Funded by Eisai Inc.

The Orphan Drug for Acanthamoeba Keratitis (ODAK) Trial: PHMB 0.08% (Polihexanide) and Placebo versus PHMB 0.02% and Propamidine 0.1%

ObjectivesTo compare topical PHMB (polihexanide) 0.02% (0.2 mg/ml) + propamidine 0.1% (1 mg/ml) [PHMB 0.02%+propamidine] to PHMB 0.08% (0.8 mg/ml) with placebo [PHMB 0.08%] for Acanthamoeba keratitis (AK) treatment. DesignProspective randomized, double-masked, active-controlled, multicentre, Phase3 study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03274895). Participants135 at six European centres between 08/17/2017 to 06/18/2021. MethodsPrincipal inclusion criteria: ≥12 years old; in vivo confocal microscopy (IVCM) with clinical findings consistent with AK. Also included were participants with concurrent bacterial keratitis, using topical steroids, antiviral and antifungal drugs before randomisation. Principal exclusions: concurrent herpes or fungal keratitis, use of anti-amoebic therapy (AAT). Randomisation: 1:1 computer-generated, block size 4. This was a superiority trial having a predefined non-inferiority margin. The sample size of 130 participants gave approximately 80% power to detect 20 percentage point superiority for PHMB 0.08% for the primary outcome of the medical cure rate (without surgery or change of AAT) within 12 months (MCR_12), cure defined by clinical criteria 90 days after discontinuing anti-inflammatories and AAT. A prespecified multivariable analysis adjusted for baseline imbalances in risk factors affecting outcomes. Main outcome measuresThe MCR_12. Secondary outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and treatment failure rates. Safety outcomes included adverse event rates. Results135 participants were randomised providing 127 in the full analysis subset (61 on PHMB 0.02%+propamidine and 66 on PHMB 0.08%) and 134 in the safety analysis subset. The adjusted MCR_12 was 86.6% (unadjusted 88.5%) for PHMB 0.02%+propamidine and 86.7% (unadjusted 84.9%) for PHMB 0.08%; the non-inferiority requirement for PHMB 0.08% was met (adjusted difference 0.1 percentage points, lower one-sided 95% confidence limit -8.3 percentage points). Secondary outcomes were similar for both treatments and not analysed statistically: median BCVA of 20/20, an overall treatment failure rate of 17/127 (13.4%) of whom 8/127 (6.3%) required therapeutic keratoplasty. There were no serious drug related adverse events. ConclusionsPHMB 0.08% monotherapy may be as effective (or at worse only eight percentage points less effective) as dual therapy with PHMB 0.02%+propamidine (a widely used therapy) with medical cure rates of >86%, when used with the Trial treatment delivery protocol, in AK populations with similar disease severity.

Randomized, open-label, cross-over, phase-3 study to evaluate efficacy and safety of LIB003 compared with evolocumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia patients on stable lipid-lowering therapy (liberate-HOFH)

Randomized, open-label, cross-over, phase-3 study to evaluate efficacy and safety of LIB003 compared with evolocumab in homozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia patients on stable lipid-lowering therapy (liberate-HOFH)

IncobotulinumtoxinA for Glabellar Frown Lines in Chinese Subjects: A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Controlled Phase-3 Study.

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase-3 study conducted in China. Subjects with moderate to severe glabellar frown lines at maximum frown were randomized to receive IncobotulinumtoxinA (N = 336) or OnabotulinumtoxinA (N = 167). For the primary efficacy endpoint at day 30, response rates at maximum frown (score "none" or "mild") on the Merz Aesthetic Scales Glabella Lines - Dynamic were comparable between IncobotulinumtoxinA (92.5%) and OnabotulinumtoxinA (95.1%) per investigator's live rating. Noninferiority of IncobotulinumtoxinA versus OnabotulinumtoxinA was successfully demonstrated, as the two-sided 95% confidence interval of -0.97% to 0.43% for the difference in Merz Aesthetic Scales-based response rates (-0.27%) lay completely above the predefined noninferiority margin of -15%. For the secondary efficacy endpoints assessed at day 30, Merz Aesthetic Scales-based response rates (score "none" or "mild") at maximum frown were similarly comparable between both groups per subject (>85%) and independent review panel (>96%) rating. Per Global Impression of Change Scales, greater than 80% of subjects and greater than 90% of investigators in both groups rated treatment results as at least "much improved" at day 30 compared with baseline. Safety profiles were consistent between groups; IncobotulinumtoxinA was well tolerated, and no new safety concerns were identified in Chinese subjects. IncobotulinumtoxinA 20 U is safe and effective for treatment of moderate to severe glabellar frown lines at maximum frown in Chinese subjects and is noninferior to OnabotulinumtoxinA 20 U.

Transcriptomic profiles and 5-year results from the randomized CLL14 study of venetoclax plus obinutuzumab versus chlorambucil plus obinutuzumab in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Data on long-term outcomes and biological drivers associated with depth of remission after BCL2 inhibition by venetoclax in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are limited. In this open-label parallel-group phase-3 study, 432 patients with previously untreated CLL were randomized (1:1) to receive either 1-year venetoclax-obinutuzumab (Ven-Obi, 216 patients) or chlorambucil-Obi (Clb-Obi, 216 patients) therapy (NCT02242942). The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included minimal residual disease (MRD) and overall survival. RNA sequencing of CD19-enriched blood was conducted for exploratory post-hoc analyses. After a median follow-up of 65.4 months, PFS is significantly superior for Ven-Obi compared to Clb-Obi (Hazard ratio [HR] 0.35 [95% CI 0.26–0.46], p < 0.0001). At 5 years after randomization, the estimated PFS rate is 62.6% after Ven-Obi and 27.0% after Clb-Obi. In both arms, MRD status at the end of therapy is associated with longer PFS. MRD + ( ≥ 10−4) status is associated with increased expression of multi-drug resistance gene ABCB1 (MDR1), whereas MRD6 (< 10−6) is associated with BCL2L11 (BIM) expression. Inflammatory response pathways are enriched in MRD+ patient solely in the Ven-Obi arm. These data indicate sustained long-term efficacy of fixed-duration Ven-Obi in patients with previously untreated CLL. The distinct transcriptomic profile of MRD+ status suggests possible biological vulnerabilities.

Population Pharmacokinetics of CMAB008 (an Infliximab Biosimilar) and Remicade® in Healthy Subjects and Patients with Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis.

CMAB008 is a monoclonal antibody developed as a biosimilar to infliximab (Remicade®, Janssen). The pharmacokinetic characteristics of CMAB008 and Remicade® in healthy subjects and patients with moderately to severely active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were investigated using a population modeling approach, and the pharmacokinetic similarity of CMAB008 to Remicade® was assessed. The population pharmacokinetic model was developed on the basis of intensive pharmacokinetic data from a phase1 study in healthy male subjects and combined intensive and sparse pharmacokinetic data from a phase3 study in patients with RA. A two-compartment model with first-order elimination adequately described CMAB008 and Remicade® concentration data in healthy subjects and patients with RA. The analysis of covariates identified anti-drug antibody (ADA), neutralizing antibody (NAB), real-time body weight (BWT), and real-time albumin (ALB) as significant covariates on clearance, and BWT was also a significant covariate for the central volume of distribution. The treatment type (CMAB008 versus Remicade®) and the study population (healthy subjects versus patients with RA) were not identified as significant covariates on the pharmacokinetics of infliximab, demonstrating pharmacokinetic similarity between CMAB008 and Remicade® in both study populations. The effect of BWT and ALB changes on exposures to infliximab was within the acceptable range, suggesting that the 3mg/kg regimen is appropriate in clinical practice for patients with RA and BTW and ALB distribution within the range evaluated in the current analysis. The pharmacokinetic characteristics were similar between CMAB008 and Remicade® in healthy subjects and patients with RA. CMAB008 can be considered bioequivalent to Remicade®. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT04779892, NCT03478111.