Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale Research Articles

Evaluation of the Whiteout During Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing and Examination of Its Correlation with Pharyngeal Residue and Aspiration.

To evaluate the whiteout duration (WOd) and intensity (WOi) during Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and examine their correlation with each other and age, gender, bolus consistencies, residue, and aspiration. Retrospective review of 75 videorecorded FEES.The first swallow of each of the following were scored: "Empty" swallow, semisolids, solids, and liquids (International dysphagia diet standardization initiative (IDDSI) 4, 7, 0, respectively). Data scored for each swallow included WOd, WOi, Penetration and aspiration scale (PAS), Pharyngeal residue (Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale, YPR-SRS), and saliva pooling (Murray Secretion scale, MSS). The highest PAS and YPR-SRS for each consistency during the entire examination were also collected. WOd was significantly longer for stronger WOi in IDDSI4 swallows (p = 0.019). WOi was weaker for IDDSI0 swallows compared to IDDSI7, IDDSI4, and empty swallows (p < 0.05). Patients with saliva pooling had significantly shorter WOd (0.81 ± 0.3 s for MSS = 0 vs. 0.62 ± 0.24 for MSS = 3, p = 0.04). Lower WOi was associated with higher mean age for IDDSI0 (mean ages of 73 ± 12, 64 ± 14, 73 ± 7, 59 ± 16years for intensity levels 1-4 respectively, p = 0.019). Swallows with weaker WOi and longer WOd had significantly more aspirations in IDDSI7 (28.8% of PAS ≥ 6 for intensity 2 vs 0% for intensity 4, p = 0.003 and 0.77 ± 0.4 s for PAS 1-2 vs. 1.02 ± 0.08 for PAS 6-8, p = 0.049). WOi and WOd are significantly associated with each other. WOi may vary for different bolus consistencies and decreases with age. Longer WOd and weaker WOi are associated with penetration-aspiration. Shorter WOd is associated with saliva pooling.

Pharyngeal Residue Scoring in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: Reliability Comparison and Applicability Among Different Scales.

Several scales to assess pharyngeal residue in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) are currently available. The study aimed to compare the reliability and the applicability in real clinical practice among four rating scales: the Pooling Score (P-SCORE), the Boston Residue and Clearance Scale (BRACS), the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), and the Residue Ordinal Rating Scale (RORS). Twenty-five FEES videos were evaluated four times, once for each scale, by four speech and language pathologists. To test intra-rater reliability, the same raters re-assessed the videos two weeks apart. To test the applicability, raters recorded the time required to complete each assessment and the perceived difficulty/ease on a visual-analog scale (VAS). The intra-rater and the inter-rater reliability were calculated with Cohen's weighted Kappa and the Fleiss weighted Kappa, respectively. Time and perceived difficulty/ease scores were compared. The intra-rater reliability analysis showed almost perfect agreement for YPRSRS (k = 0.91) and RORS (k = 0.83) and substantial agreement for P-SCORE (k = 0.76) and BRACS (k = 0.74). Pairwise comparison showed no significant differences among the scales. The inter-rater reliability for the YPRSRS (k = 0.78) was significantly higher than P-SCORE (k = 0.52, p < 0.001), BRACS (k = 0.56, p < 0.001), and RORS (k = 0.65, p = 0.005). The BRACS required the longest time (p < 0.001) and was perceived as the most difficult scale (p < 0.001). The RORS was perceived as the easiest scale (p < 0.05). In conclusion, the YPRSRS showed the highest reliability, while raters perceived the RORS as the easiest to score. These results will allow clinicians to consciously choose which scale to use in clinical practice.

Accumulated Secretions and Associated Aerodigestive Function in Patients With Dysphagia.

Accumulated pharyngo-laryngeal secretions are associated with dysphagia, aspiration, and poor health outcomes. Despite ongoing developments in the evaluation of pharyngo-laryngeal secretions, understanding of the underlying mechanisms is limited. Pathophysiology associated with accumulated secretions is needed to guide tailored, targeted treatment pathways. This study reports the prevalence of accumulated pharyngo-laryngeal secretions in a large acute care caseload and explores the relationship between secretions and aerodigestive function. Consecutive inpatients (N = 222) referred for flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallow (FEES) with suspected dysphagia following assessment by a speech-language pathologist were recruited (43% neurological, 22% neurosurgical, 20% critical care, 15% other), and 250 standardized FEES were completed (222 first FEES, 28 repeat FEES). The assessment protocol included secretion assessment using the New Zealand Secretion Scale (NZSS), pharyngeal squeeze maneuver, laryngeal motor and sensory assessment, Penetration-Aspiration Scale, and Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale. Urge-to-clear ratings were collected during endoscopy. Cough peak expiratory flow and swallow frequency measures were also collected, as well as clinical outcomes at time of discharge. There was a high incidence of accumulated secretions, with 77% of inpatients having elevated NZSS (Mdn = 3, range: 0-7) and 37% with pooled laryngeal secretions. Accumulated secretions were associated with reduced swallow frequency, reduced laryngeal adductor reflex, impaired pharyngeal squeeze maneuver, and peak expiratory flow. NZSS scores also correlated with swallow measures (Penetration-Aspiration Scale and Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale) and patient outcomes including diet recommendations at discharge and pneumonia during admission. This large study contributes to evidence associating both sensory and motor impairments with secretion accumulation and aspiration risk. Further exploration of the key physiological mechanisms contributing to accumulated secretions will serve as markers to provide proof of principle for targets for secretion management protocols. https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24101667.

The discriminant ability of the eating assessment tool-10 questionnaire to detect residue and aspiration in patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia.

To investigate the discriminant ability of the eating assessment tool-10 (EAT-10) to detect postswallow residue and aspiration for different consistencies. Seventy-two consecutive patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia (42 males and 30 females, mean ± sd age of 60.42 ± 15.82) were included. After completing the EAT-10, Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) was performed to assess the efficiency and safety of swallowing for the following consistencies: thin liquid, nectar thick, yogurt, and solid. While swallowing efficiency was evaluated using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS), the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to evaluate swallowing safety. The EAT-10 questionnaire significantly identified the patients with residue from those without residue for the following consistencies and anatomic locations: thin liquid residue in the pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 10, p = 0.009), nectar thick residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 15, p = 0.001), yogurt residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 15, p = 0.009), yogurt residue in the pyriform sinus (cutoff score ≥ 9, p = 0.015), and solid residue in the vallecula (cutoff score ≥ 13, p = 0.016). However, the same discriminant ability of EAT-10 was not found for detecting aspiration in any consistency. The EAT-10 questionnaire can be used as an assessment tool to judge swallowing efficiency in patients with mixed etiology of dysphagia, but the same is not evident for swallowing safety.

Validity and reliability of the Italian translation of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale.

In the dysphagic patient, pharyngeal residues (PR) are associated with aspiration and poor quality of life. The assessment of PR using validated scales during flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) is crucial for rehabilitation. This study aims to validate and test the reliability of the Italian version of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (IT-YPRSRS). The effects of training and experience in FEES on the scale were also determined. The original YPRSRS was translated into Italian according to standardised guidelines. Thirty FEES images were selected after consensus and proposed to 22 naive raters who were asked to assess the severity of PR in each image. Raters were divided into two subgroups by years of experience at FEES, and randomly by training. Construct validity, inter-rater, and intra-rater reliability were assessed by kappa statistics. IT-YPRSRS showed substantial to almost perfect agreement (kappa > 0.75) in validity and reliability for both the overall sample (660 ratings), and valleculae/pyriform sinus sites (330 ratings each). No significant differences emerged between groups considering years of experience, and variable differences were observed by training. The IT-YPRSRS demonstrated excellent validity and reliability in identifying location and severity of PR.

Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing as a tool to facilitate dysphagia rehabilitation following a salvage hemi-glossectomy: Case report

Background: Dysphagia is a common consequence of tongue cancer and its treatment, with the possibility of long-term diet modification and feeding tube dependence. This is likely to have an impact on the activity, participation and psychological wellbeing of the individual. Objective: This case report presents the use of fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallow (FEES) as a tool to support dysphagia rehabilitation through providing visual feedback following a salvage hemi-glossectomy for management of a recurrent squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the right anterolateral tongue. Methods: Clinician-rated and patient-reported outcome measures were used to assess the effectiveness of FEES as a tool to facilitate dysphagia rehabilitation. These measures include the: Performance Status Scale for Head and Neck (PSS-HN) cancer patients, 100 mL water swallow test (WST), Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS), the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale, and the Functional Intraoral Glasgow Scale (FIGS). Results: No Statistical tests were performed on this single case, however the results demonstrate a notable clinical improvement in all postoperative outcome measures at 12-months when compared with those taken two-months postoperatively. Conclusion: Use of sequential FEES could enhance patient engagement and inform dysphagia rehabilitation following hemi-glossectomy.

Potential of Rice-Flour Jelly Made from High-Amylose Rice as a Dysphagia Diet: Evaluation of Pharyngeal Residue by FEES

Dysphagia diets are recommended to prevent choking and aspiration in people with dysphagia; however, rice-porridge and mashed rice-porridge, which are used as staple foods for people with dysphagia in Japan, are time-consuming to prepare. The National Agriculture and Food Research Organization has found jelly-like food products made from high-amylose rice-flour (rice-flour jelly) to be easy to prepare with a texture suitable for dysphagia diets. To investigate the potential of rice-flour jelly for the dysphagia diet, we evaluated the amount of pharyngeal residue after swallowing rice-flour jelly using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing and compared it with those of rice-porridge, mashed rice-porridge, and fruit jelly. We enrolled 70 participants (43 males and 27 females, aged 32–96 years, median 74.5 years) and evaluated their pharyngeal residue using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale which includes five levels from I (none) to V (severe). Statistical analysis showed that level I was more common in fruit jelly for vallecula residue and pyriform sinus residue, and level III (mild) was more common in rice-porridge for vallecula residue (p < 0.05). No differences of pharyngeal residue were found in rice-flour jelly or mashed rice-porridge. No significant difference was observed in the number of participants with laryngeal penetration or aspiration. Therefore, rice-flour jelly is a suitable alternative to rice-porridge as a staple food for people with dysphagia in terms of food texture.

Effects of Carbonated Thickened Drinks on Pharyngeal Swallowing with a Flexible Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing in Older Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia.

This study aimed to determine the efficacy of carbonated and sweetened drinks added to thickened liquids, which are routinely used for patients with dysphagia to improve dysphagia. Patients swallowed thin liquid (Thin), thickened liquid (Thick), carbonated thin drink (C-Thin), and carbonated thickened drink (C-Thick) in random order. Penetration and/or aspiration were scored using the Penetration–Aspiration Scale (PAS). The residue was scored using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPR-SRS). Swallowing reflex initiation was scored using the Hyodo score. The subjective difficulty of swallowing was scored on a face scale. We analyzed 13 patients with a mean age of 79.6 ± 9.6 years. PAS was significantly lower in the C-Thick group than the Thin group (p < 0.05). Swallowing reflex initiation was significantly different between the Thin and Thick (p < 0.01) groups; moreover, post hoc analysis revealed that it was significantly lower in the C-Thick group than the Thin group (p < 0.01). The subjective difficulty of swallowing in the C-Thick was significantly lower than the Thick group (p < 0.05). C-Thick was easier to swallow than Thick and may improve penetration and/or aspiration in older patients with dysphagia with complex diseases.

Predictive clinical factors for penetration-aspiration in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma after radiotherapy

Penetration-aspiration is the most serious complication in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) after radiotherapy. Radiotherapy has been shown to increase the patient's survival rate and life expectancy but it showed serious side effects such as oropharyngeal dysphagia. It’s related morbidity and mortality such as penetration-aspiration could progress to aspiration pneumonia, sepsis, and death if not treated properly. Factors suspected to be the determinants of penetration-aspiration were the location of the pharyngeal residue, the stage of NPC, and the time after radiotherapy. This primary objective of this study was to determine the clinical factors of penetration-aspiration in patients with NPC after radiotherapy. In a cross sectional, observational analytic study, a total of 24 patients were obtained with consecutive sampling technique. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) examination was performed on patients with NPC after radiotherapy to assess pharyngeal residue and penetration-aspiration. The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPR-SRS) and the Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) was used to assess the presence of pharyngeal residue and penetration-aspiration, respectively. Statistical analysis used multiple logistic regression (p&lt;0,05) and Wald statistics to find a stronger relationship between variables.

Reliability and Construct Validity of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale: Performance on Videos and Effect of Bolus Consistency.

The Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS) provides an image-based assessment of pharyngeal residue in the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Its performance was investigated only in FEES frames. This study analyzed the reliability and construct validity of the YPRSRS in FEES videos and the influence of bolus consistency. Thirty pairs of FEES videos and frames, 8 thin liquids (<50 mPa·s), 11 pureed (2583.3 mPa·s at 50 s−1, 697.87 mPa·s at 300 s−1), and 11 solid food; were assessed by 29 clinicians using the YPRSRS; 14 raters re-assessed materials at least 15 days from the first evaluation. Construct validity and intra-rater reliability were assessed using weighted Cohen’s Kappa. Inter-rater reliability was assessed using weighted Fleiss Kappa. Construct validity and inter-rater reliability were almost perfect or excellent for frames (0.82 ≤ k ≤ 0.89) and substantial or intermediate to good for videos (0.67 ≤ k ≤ 0.79). Intra-rater reliability was almost perfect for both frames and videos (k ≥ 0.84). Concerning bolus consistency, thin liquids had significantly lower values of construct validity, intra-, and inter-rater reliability than pureed and solid food. Construct validity and inter-rater reliability were significantly lower for solid food than for pureed food. The YPRSRS showed satisfactory reliability and construct validity also in FEES videos. Reliability was significantly influenced by bolus consistency.

Comparison of Simultaneous Swallowing Endoscopy and Videofluoroscopy in Neurogenic Dysphagia.

In the evaluation of oropharyngeal dysphagia, instrumental procedures, for example, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing or videofluoroscopic swallowing study, are essential to improve diagnostic accuracy for salient findings such as penetration, aspiration, or pharyngeal residue. To date, it is unclear which of the 2 methods represents the diagnostic gold standard. The aim of this study, therefore, was to compare videofluoroscopy and swallowing endoscopy during a simultaneous swallowing examination in a large cohort of patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia. Prospective observational study. In this study, 49 patients with oropharyngeal dysphagia (mean age 70.0 ± 10.8years) were evaluated using simultaneous swallowing endoscopy and videofluoroscopy. Furthermore, the effect of narrow-band imaging in swallowing endoscopy on the assessment of penetration and aspiration was investigated in a subgroup of 19 patients. The Penetration-Aspiration Scale and the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale were rated independently based on both modalities. Both modalities showed a high correlation between penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue. Causes for a higher score on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale in videofluoroscopy were intradeglutitive events that were not visible in swallowing endoscopy or false-positive events because of the loss of the lateral dimension in videofluoroscopy. A typical reason for a higher score on this scale in swallowing endoscopy was the better visualization of the anatomical structures. Narrow-band imaging in swallowing endoscopy resulted in a higher score on the Penetration-Aspiration Scale for liquids and semisolids in individual cases, although overall there was no statistically significant difference between scores using white light or narrow-band imaging. Videofluoroscopy and swallowing endoscopy may equally be considered as a diagnostic gold standard for oropharyngeal dysphagia regarding penetration, aspiration, and pharyngeal residue. Narrow-band imaging may increase the sensitivity for penetration and aspiration in individual cases.

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Versus Transcutaneous Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in Post Stroke Dysphagia: A Clinical Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectivesTo evaluate the efficacy of high-frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied contralesionally versus transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (TNES) in acute post-stroke dysphagic patients. Materials and methodsA randomized, parallel, comparative, controlled trial was conducted on patients with acute ischemic stroke who were admitted to our department. Fifteen patients received rTMS, 15 patients received TNES, and 15 patients were recruited as a control group. Between the second and tenth days after a stroke, patients were enrolled. The study and follow-up periods were completed by all patients. ResultsAmong the screened patients, 45 (31.47%) right-handed patients were diagnosed with post-stroke dysphagia with a mean age of 60.53 ± 8.23 years. Immediately after intervention both rTMS and TNES groups significantly improve the swallowing disturbance questionnaire (SDQ) and penetration aspiration scale (PAS), compared to the control (p < 0.001 and p = 0.027), respectively. rTMS was more effective than TNES in reducing SDQ and PAS (p < 0.05). rTMS and TNES improved the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPRSRS) significantly (p = 0.002); however, their efficacy was comparable (p > 0.05). A significant (p < 0.001) strong negative correlation was observed between the grade of weakness and all scores. ConclusionOur findings showed that high-frequency rTMS and TNES effectively improved the clinical condition of acute post-stroke dysphagic patients in terms of swallowing disturbance assessed by SDQ, pharyngeal residue assessed by YPRSRS, and the severity of penetration and aspiration events evaluated by PAS, compared to the controls. The outcomes of high-frequency rTMS were more favorable than those of TNES in terms of SDQ and PAS.

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire.

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Sydney Swallow Questionnaire (SSQ-T) and calculate a cutoff value to help clinicians to suspect/predict oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD). The original questionnaire was translated into Turkish by two bilingual English Turkish translators. The study included 170 Turkish adult subjects. Half of the participants were patients presenting with OPD, and half were healthy controls. Fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) was administered to all subjects. Patients were evaluated using the Turkish Penetration Aspiration Scale and the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale. Additionally, the final version of the SSQ-T questionnaire and the Turkish Eating Assessment Tool were administered to all subjects. Internal consistency was high on all questions (Cronbach's α = .974). Test-retest reliability was also high (intraclass correlation coefficient = .975, p < .001; 95% confidence interval [.948-.988]). The SSQ-T score range was 0-1,240 for all participants, 57-1,240 for the patients with OPD, and 0-152 for the healthy controls. The cutoff value was 174 with 85.96% sensitivity and 99.12% specificity. The SSQ-T was demonstrated to be a valid and reliable assessment to assess the self-perceived severity of OPD.

Theta burst stimulation versus high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for poststroke dysphagia: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.

Background:Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of high-frequency (10 Hz) on suprahyoid motor cortex has been an evidence-based treatment for poststroke dysphagia. Intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) can be performed in 3 minutes compared with 20 ± 5 minutes for 10 Hz rTMS. This study aimed to ensure the clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of iTBS compared with 10 Hz rTMS for patients with poststroke dysphagia.Method:In this randomized, double-blind, single-center, controlled trial, 47 participants were randomly assigned to iTBS (n = 24) and rTMS (n = 23) group. Each participant received iTBS or rTMS daily at suprahyoid motor cortex of affected hemisphere for 10 consecutive days. The outcomes were assessed at baseline, immediately, and 2 weeks after intervention, including water-swallowing test, standardized swallowing assessment, Mann assessment of swallowing ability, Murray Secretion Scale, Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale, Penetration-Aspiration Scale, and motor evoked potential (MEP) of bilateral suprahyoid muscle.Results:There were no significant differences between groups. There was a significant improvement on all rating scales and MEP after rTMS and iTBS. No significant differences on water-swallowing test, Mann assessment of swallowing ability, standardized swallowing assessment, Murray Secretion Scale scores, and MEP were observed between groups. In particular, there was significant differences on Penetration-Aspiration Scale scores (viscous liquid: mean difference = 1.016; 95% CI: 0.32–1.71; effect size: 0.360; P = .005) and the residue rate of pyriform fossa (viscous liquid: mean difference = 0.732; 95% CI: 0.18–1.28; effect size: 0.248; P = .010) in between-group. Comparing the differences over the changes of all rating scales, only the residue rate of epiglottis valley between groups was found to be significantly different (dilute liquid: mean difference = –0.567; 95% CI: –0.98 to –0.15; P = .009). There was no severe adverse effect and high dropout rates in both groups.Conclusion:The clinical efficacy, safety, and tolerability of iTBS showed non-inferior to 10 Hz rTMS for patients with poststroke dysphagia. The present study can be used to improve the clinicians’ knowledge and clinical decision skills on iTBS and rTMS for poststroke dysphagia.

Changes in voice quality, swallowing, and pulmonary function after parathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism

ObjectiveTo find changes in voice quality, airway invasion during swallowing, pharyngeal residue after swallowing, acoustic and aerodynamic measurements and pulmonary function tests after total parathyroidectomy plus auto-transplantation for secondary hyperparathyroidism. MethodsWe recruited 38 patients who underwent successful surgery for secondary hyperparathyroidism in this study. Voice quality was evaluated using voice handicap index (VHI-10), eating assessment tool (EAT-10), voice impairment, and the grade, roughness, breathiness, asthenia, strain (GRBAS) scale. Acoustic and aerodynamic measurements included fundamental frequency (F0), maximal phonation time, high pitch, jitter, s/z, shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio. Vocal cord mobility, vocal cord closure, premature spillage, the penetration–aspiration scale and the Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale (PRSRS) after swallowing were examined using fiber-optic endoscopy. Pulmonary function tests included forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in 1 s, bronchodilator test, total lung capacity, diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide, alveolar volume, and distance and O2 desaturation of the 6 min walking test (6MWT). ResultsFour months after successful parathyroidectomy, VHI-10 improved significantly (p < 0.01); incomplete vocal cord closure decreased significantly (p < 0.01); the Yale PRSRS for vallecula and pyriform sinus improved significantly (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02); F0 and high pitch increased significantly (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01); O2 desaturation (<4%) of 6MWT improved significantly (p = 0.04). ConclusionsParathyroidectomy for secondary hyperparathyroidism can improve the voice quality, vocal cord closure, the Yale PRSRS for vallecular and pyriform sinus and O2 desaturation of 6MWT, and increase F0 and high pitch.

Validation of the Munich Swallowing Score (MUCSS) in patients with neurogenic dysphagia: A preliminary study.

The Munich Swallowing Score (MUCSS) is a clinician rated scale for the assessment of the functional level of swallowing saliva/secretions, food and liquids. The MUCSS consists of two eight-point subscales, MUCSS-Saliva and MUCSS-Nutrition. In a previous article, content validity and interrater reliability were described. The aim of the present study was to investigate criterion validity and sensitivity to change of the MUCSS. The research was conducted at a tertiary care academic hospital. Data were collected retrospectively in a cohort of 100 acute and subacute neurologic patients. Criterion validity was judged by comparison to the Gugging Swallowing Screen (GUSS), the Barthel Index (BI), Early Rehabilitation Barthel Index (ERI), Extended Barthel Index (EBI) and also by comparison to three physiological scales drawn from FEES videos: The Penetration - Aspiration Scale (PAS), the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPR) and the Murray Secretion Scale (MSS). Changes in oral intake and saliva swallowing were followed up for three months. Between MUCSS and scores directly reflecting dysphagic symptoms (GUSS, PAS, YPR, MSS, ERI), strong to moderate correlations were found, weaker but statistically significant associations were seen with global measures of disability (BI isolated, EBI-subscale cognitive functions). MUCSS was sensitive to positive change of saliva swallowing and oral intake during the recovery period. These preliminary data suggest that the MUCCS is a valid scale and may be appropriate for documenting clinical change in swallowing abilities of patients with neurogenic dysphagia.

Finnish Version of the Eating Assessment Tool (F-EAT-10): A Valid and Reliable Patient-reported Outcome Measure for Dysphagia Evaluation

Our aim was to validate a Finnish version of the Eating Assessment Tool (F-EAT-10) for clinical use and to test its reliability and validity in a multicenter nationwide study. Normative data were acquired from 180 non-dysphagic participants (median age 57.0 years, 62.2% female). Dysphagia patients (n = 117, median age 69.7 years, 53.0% female) referred to fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) completed F-EAT-10 before the examination and after 2 weeks. Patients underwent the 100-ml water swallow test (WST) and FEES was evaluated using the following three scales: the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale, Penetration-Aspiration Scale, and the Dysphagia Outcome Severity Scale. An operative cohort of 19 patients (median age 75.8 years, 57.9% female) underwent an endoscopic operation on Zenker’s diverticulum, tight cricopharyngeal muscle diagnosed in videofluorography, or both. Patients completed the F-EAT-10 preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The cut-off score for controls was < 3 (sensitivity 94.0%, specificity 96.1%) suggesting that ≥ 3 is abnormal. Re-questionnaires for test–retest reliability analysis were available from 92 FEES patients and 123 controls. The intraclass correlation coefficient was excellent for the total F-EAT-10 score (0.93, 95% confidence interval 0.91–0.95). Pearson correlation coefficients were strong (p < 0.001) for each of the questions and the total score. Internal consistency as assessed by Cronbach’s alpha was excellent (0.95). Some correlations between findings in FEES and 100-ml WST with F-EAT-10 were observed. The change in subjective symptoms of operative patients paralleled the change in F-EAT-10. F-EAT-10 is a reliable, valid, and symptom-specific patient-reported outcome measure for assessing dysphagia among Finnish speakers.

Effects of carbonation of liquids on penetration-aspiration and residue management.

ObjectiveCarbonation as a sensory enhancement strategy for prevention of aspiration of thin liquids has not been thoroughly studied. The aim of our study was to examine the effect of carbonation on penetration–aspiration and pharyngeal residue in dysphagia patients using Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) and to identify parameters associated with a response to carbonation.MethodsA cross-sectional study of patients undergoing FEES in a dysphagia clinic. Patients were offered 100 cc of dyed water. Penetration–aspiration was scored using the penetration–aspiration scale (PAS). Residue was scored using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPR-SRS). Patients with a PAS ≥ 2 for water were subsequently offered 100 cc of carbonated water. PAS, YPR-SRS and residue clearance were compared between thin and carbonated liquids. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for good response to carbonation.Results84 patients were enrolled, 77.4% males, with diverse dysphagia etiologies (58.3% neurogenic, 11.9% radiation-induced, 23.8% deconditioning-induced, and 6% neck surgery induced). Median PAS was 7 (IQR 4–8) for thin liquids and 4.5 (IQR 2–8) for carbonated liquids (P = 0.0001). YPR-SRS was reduced for carbonated compared to thin liquids in the vallecula (1.58 ± 0.83 vs 1.76 ± 0.93, P = 0.001) and piriform sinuses (1.5 ± 0.87 vs 1.67 ± 0.9, P = 0.002). 31 patients had improvement in PAS with carbonation. Deconditioning as a dysphagia etiology was found to predict good response to carbonation on multivariate logistic regression analysis.ConclusionCarbonation may prevent aspiration and improve residue management for some patients with dysphagia for liquids.Level of evidenceIV.

Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Translation of the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale.

This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the Turkish translation of the Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale. The scale measures the severity of residue in the vallecula and pyriform sinus. The original scale was translated into Turkish by two bilingual English-Turkish translators, and the Turkish version was translated back into English by two qualified professional translators to assess accuracy. The evaluators were divided into two groups (training and no-training) and two subgroups according to their experience. Intra-rater, inter-rater, and intra-class correlation coefficient measurements were analyzed by calculating agreement rates, kappa, and p values. In the analysis of the reliability, intra-class correlation coefficient values in the overall ratings for both the vallecula and the pyriform sinus were 0.9996 (95% CI 0.9992-0.9998) and 0.9997 (95% CI 0.9995-0.9999), respectively (p < 0.01). High agreement (> 95%) and perfect Fleiss kappa values were obtained for the vallecula and pyriform sinus ratings in the inter-rater initial assessments (κ = 0.959 and κ = 0.967, respectively). Perfect kappa values were found in the intra-rater results for both the vallecula and pyriform sinus (α = 0.9959 and κ = 0.9959, respectively). In the inter-rater secondary analysis, the vallecula and pyriform sinus kappa values were perfect (κ = 0.959 and κ = 0.967, respectively). In the intra-rater analysis, perfect kappa values were obtained for the vallecula and pyriform sinus in the no-training group and less-experience subgroup (κ = 0.9918 and κ = 1.0 for the vallecula, and κ = 1.0 and κ = 0.9902 for the pyriform sinus, respectively) In the inter-rater analysis, perfect kappa values were obtained for the vallecula and pyriform sinus in the no-training group and less-experience subgroup (κ = 0.9507 and κ = 0.9606 for the vallecula, and κ = 0.9836 and κ = 1.0 for the pyriform sinus, respectively). The Turkish translation of the Yale pharyngeal residue severity rating scale demonstrated high validity and reliability scores in determining pharyngeal residue location and value in the fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing.

Correlation of Pharyngeal Residue with PenetrationAspiration in Post-Radiotherapy Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients with Oropharyngeal Dysphagia

Background: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) ranks first for head and neck malignancies, and radiotherapyis a recommended treatment. Most post-radiotherapy NPC patients experience oropharyngeal dysphagia thatresults in pharyngeal residue. Pharyngeal residue is thought to be a risk factor for aspiration-penetration.Objective: Examining the correlation between pharyngeal residue and penetration-aspiration in postradiotherapy NPC patients.Method: Participants have been identified since 2018 to find out the total number of NPC patients. Inthe period January-October 2019, identification of NPC patients was performed according to participantcriteria. Participants were examined for fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES), pharyngealresidue using the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale (YPR-SRS), and penetration-aspirationusing Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS). Statistical tests were used Spearman correlation test with p&lt;0.05.Results: The highest participant’s pharyngeal residue appeared in vallecula when given soft bolus (96.55%),and in pyriform sinus when given thick liquid bolus (72.41%). Most participants with soft bolus had thehighest negative penetration (72.59%) and positive penetration in thick liquid bolus (51.72%), while mosthad negative aspirations with the lowest value (89.66%). There is aspiration in 10.34% of patients whengiven a dilute liquid. There was a significant correlation between pharyngeal residue in vallecula andpyriform sinus with penetration-aspiration (p&lt;0.05). There was a positive association with the use of softbolus (r=0.623), thick liquid bolus (r=0.631), and dilute liquid bolus (r=0.891).Conclusions: There is a significant association between pharyngeal residue and penetration-aspiration inpost-radiotherapy NPC patients.