Pharmacy Costs Research Articles

Higher healthcare cost and utilization before and after diagnosis of AATD in the United States.

Patients with alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) often experience substantial delays from the onset of symptoms to a diagnosis. We explored the impact of delayed diagnosis of AATD on healthcare costs and utilization by assessing costs/utilization before and after diagnosis. Retrospective claims data was used to conduct a longitudinal analysis of a cohort of patients with follow-up over four years in a commercial claims database was conducted. Patients with at least four years of claims experience between the years 2011 - 2017 were included in this study. Outcome measures were calculated for each year (Year 1 pre-index diagnosis, and Years 1, 2, and 3 post-index follow-up). Measures included healthcare costs (pharmacy and medical costs), medical costs, inpatient events, and emergency room visits. Unadjusted measures in the follow-up Year 1, Year 2, and Year 3 were compared to Year 1 pre-index. A separate multivariate analysis adjusting for age, sex, and comorbidities was conducted. Among 1258 patients, mean adjusted healthcare costs were significantly higher in Year 1 post-index compared to Year 1 pre-index ($51,785 vs $41,441, p = < 0.05). In Year 2 ($36,937 vs $41,441, p = < 0.05) and 3 ($28,558 vs $41,441, p = < 0.05) post-index, mean adjusted healthcare costs decreased compared to Year 1 pre-index. Adjusted medical costs were similar in Year 1 ($25,034) post-index compared to Year 1 ($22,952) pre-index but were significantly lower in Year 2 ($15,242 vs $25,034, p = < 0.05) and Year 3 ($8,779 vs $25,034, p = < 0.05) post-index. The frequency of inpatient and emergency room events was significantly lower in all three observation periods following diagnosis in the unadjusted analysis. The adjusted analysis showed similar findings, except for emergency room visits, which were similar across all observation periods. Patients with AATD had substantial healthcare costs/utilization in the year before diagnosis. Costs were significantly higher in the first year following diagnosis. However, subsequent years showed cost reductions to levels below pre-diagnosis. These data support the need for strategies to reduce the time from symptom onset to diagnosis.

Clinical, Quality of Life, and Health Care Utilization Outcomes of Switching the Administration Route of Antipsychotic Medications Among People With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Using long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotic medications can improve the outcomes of patients with schizophrenia, such as reducing symptom severity and hospitalization risk. However, the outcomes of switching from oral to LAI antipsychotic medications are unclear. The purpose of this review is to provide a summary of the clinical, quality of life, and health care utilization outcomes of switching from oral to LAI antipsychotics among patients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder. We thoroughly searched the PubMed, Scopus, PsycInfo, and CINAHL databases. To conduct the meta-analysis, we used the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Program. Forty-one articles met our inclusion criteria. After switching to LAIs, symptom severity, the number of rehospitalizations, emergency department visits, and overall health care costs were reduced. Also, social functioning significantly improved. However, no differences were observed in the frequency of outpatient visits. Pharmacy costs were increased between pre- and post-LAI initiation. Our findings support evidence that changing the route of administration of antipsychotic medications from oral to long-acting intramuscular injections can improve the clinical, quality of life, and health care utilization outcomes in people with schizophrenia. Health care practitioners might consider encouraging LAI use earlier during treatment for schizophrenia for better clinical outcomes and to reduce health care utilization associated with treatment.

Chronic headaches after traumatic brain injury: Diagnostic complexity associated with increased cost.

Chronic headache after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a common, yet disabling, disorder whose diverse clinical characteristics and treatment needs remain poorly defined. To examine diagnostic coding patterns and cost among military Veterans with comorbid chronic headache and TBI. We identified 141,125 post-9/11 era Veterans who served between 2001 and 2019 with a headache disorder diagnosed after TBI. We first identified patterns of Complex Headache Combinations (CHC) and then compared the patterns of healthcare costs in 2022-dollar values in the three years following the TBI diagnosis. Veterans had diverse individual headache and CHC diagnoses with uniformly high cost of care. Post-whiplash and post-TBI CHCs were common and consistently associated with higher costs after TBI than those with other types of headache and CHCs. Post-TBI migraine had the highest unadjusted mean inpatient ($27,698), outpatient ($61,417), and pharmacy ($4,231) costs, which persisted even after adjustment for confounders including demographic, military, and clinical characteristics. Headache diagnoses after TBI, particularly those diagnosed with post-traumatic headache, are complex, and associated with dual high cost and care burdens. More research is needed to examine whether this higher expenditure reflects more intensive treatment and better outcomes or refractory headache with worse outcomes.

Economic Burden Associated with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension in the United States.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a progressive disease characterized by elevated pressure in the pulmonary arteries, commonly resulting in right heart failure. PAH is associated with a high economic burden throughout the duration of the disease. This retrospective cohort study of the Milliman Contributor Health Source Data, the Medicare 100% Research Identifiable Files, and the Merative Marketscan® Commercial dataset between 2018 and 2020 identified adult patients with prevalent PAH based on the earliest qualifying diagnosis date or medication date ('index date') between January 1, 2019 and November 30, 2020. Outcomes were assessed using patient data from index date through the earliest of end of enrollment, end of data, or death (Medicare fee-for-service [FFS] only). All-cause and PAH-related medical and pharmacy costs per-patient per-month (PPPM) and healthcare resource utilization per 1000 patients were summarized. The study included 11,670 Medicare FFS, 1021 Medicare Advantage, 274 Medicaid, and 1174 commercially insured patients in the US. The annual national burden to payers was estimated to be US$3.1 billion. The PPPM payer costs ranged from US$6500 to US$14,742; out-of-pocket (OOP) costs ranged from US$341 to US$907 PPPM. Inpatient utilization rate ranged from 435 to 770 per 1000 patients for all-cause admissions and from 15 to 58 per 1000 patients for PAH-related admissions. This study demonstrates that PAH continues to be associated with a high economic burden and healthcare resource utilization across all payer types within the US healthcare system.

Evaluating estimated health care resource utilization and costs in patients with myelofibrosis based on transfusion status and anemia severity: A retrospective analysis of the Medicare Fee-For-Service claims data.

Myelofibrosis (MF) is a rare but aggressive myeloproliferative neoplasm that commonly affects older patients, with a mean age of onset of older than 60 years. At least a third of patients with primary MF are anemic at diagnosis, and nearly all patients become anemic over time; approximately half require red blood cell transfusions within a year of diagnosis. Anemia and transfusion dependence are leading negative prognostic factors for overall survival and are associated with diminished quality of life and increased health care-related economic burden in patients with MF. To describe baseline characteristics, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs as a function of transfusion status and anemia severity in patients diagnosed with MF among the US Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) population. This retrospective cohort study included patients diagnosed with MF appearing in the 100% Medicare FFS database enrolled between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2020. Patients were segmented into hemoglobin level cohorts (no, mild, moderate, and severe anemia) and transfusion status cohorts (transfusion independent [TI], transfusion requiring [TR], or transfusion dependent [TD]). Across cohorts, demographics and disease characteristics were assessed at baseline; per patient per month all-cause HCRU and medical and pharmacy costs were reported during follow-up. All results were summarized descriptively. The transfusion status cohort (N = 1,749) included TI (n = 980), TR (n = 559), and TD (n = 210) patients; the anemia severity cohort (N = 365) included patients with no (n = 100), mild (n = 128), moderate (n = 99), and severe (n = 38) anemia. On average, TR and TD patients or those with moderate or severe anemia had numerically higher Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than those who were TI or had mild or no anemia. TR and TD cohorts reported numerically greater all-cause outpatient, inpatient, and emergency department utilization vs the TI cohort. All-cause costs were numerically higher in the TD and TR cohorts vs the TI cohort ($14,655 and $14,249 vs $8,191). Incremental increases in HCRU and costs were also observed with increasing anemia severity. All-cause medical and pharmacy costs for no, mild, moderate, and severe anemia cohorts were $4,689, $7,268, $10,439, and $13,590, respectively. This retrospective analysis of the US Medicare FFS database descriptively evaluated patients by transfusion status and anemia severity and showed that costs and HCRU were numerically lower for patients with transfusion independence compared with those with transfusion dependence. Similar trends were seen when comparing patients based on anemia status, with numerically lower HCRU and cost observed with decreasing anemia severity.

A retrospective claims data analysis of health care utilization and cost among patients receiving multi-injection intraarticular hyaluronic acid.

With the rising costs for knee arthroplasty, therapies that allow patients to avoid or delay surgery following knee osteoarthritis (KOA) may help in reducing overall health care costs. Multiple intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) products are available on the market, varying by formulation, molecular weight, and number of injections, but clinical and economic benefits may differ by product. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the all-cause and KOA-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among newly diagnosed patients with KOA treated with multi-injection HA. A retrospective cohort study using a large commercial claims database (Merative MarketScan database) to identify patients with KOA treated with high molecular weight (HMW) (n = 11,200), medium molecular weight (MMW) (n = 10,225), or low molecular weight (LMW) HAs (n = 8,473) between 2016 and 2019. KOA-related and all-cause HCRU and costs were compared within 12 months after the index HA treatment date. The association between outcomes and HA treatments was evaluated using a doubly robust method to adjust for confounding factors. HCRU and costs among the propensity score-weighted HA groups were compared using generalized linear models. HMW HA patients were found to have lower adjusted KOA-related medical costs by $265.37 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy costs by $19.90 (P < 0.001) compared with LMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause total medical costs by $130.42 (P = 0.013) and pharmacy costs by $63.33 (P < 0.001). HMW HA patients also had a lower adjusted KOA-related medical cost by $205.74 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy cost by $14.39 (P < 0.001) compared with MMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause medical by $1,195.66 (P < 0.001) and pharmacy by $196.99 (P < 0.001). Three-injection treatment patients (HMW HA, 84%; MMW HA, 82%) had high completion rate, compared with the 5-injection treatment cohort (LMW HA, 48%). HMW HA patients had statistically significantly lower adjusted all-cause and KOA-related medical and pharmacy costs at 1 year follow-up compared with MMW HA and LMW HA patients. It is unclear if this is related to differences in molecular weight or specific mechanism of actions.

Healthcare spending and out-of-pocket burden for working-aged adults after a cancer diagnosis.

16 Background: The cost of cancer care rose dramatically over the past decades, increasing the financial burden on patients. However, current estimates of healthcare spending and out-of-pocket burden rely heavily on data from older populations that may not reflect contemporary treatment patterns in working-aged adults or variation in type of insurance coverage. Methods: We used the 2012-2021 Colorado Central Cancer Registry linked to the All-Payer Claims Database to identify adults aged 22-63 years newly diagnosed with invasive cancer who were consecutively enrolled on the same insurance type or the month of diagnosis and 6 months after (or until death). We used quantile regression to adjust spending by age and sex and report median insurer reimbursements for medical care and pharmacy costs and out-of-pocket spending (copays, deductibles, coinsurance) for the most common insurance and cancer types. Results: Among 31,179 individuals newly diagnosed with cancer, the median total spending six months after diagnosis across all cancers ranged from 59,022 for those insured by private non-health maintenance organization (HMO) plans to 26,887 for those enrolled on Medicaid and 19,152 for those on Medicare Advantage (MA) plans (Table). The majority of spending was for medical care. Among individuals insured by private non-HMO plans, those with lymphoma had the highest total median spending at 130,408, followed by lung (94,207), breast ($87,830), and leukemia ($82,445). Although total spending was markedly lower among those insured by Medicaid, among this group, individuals with leukemia ($50,399) and lymphoma (48,747) experienced the highest median spending. Out-of-pocket spending was substantially higher for those insured by private non-HMO plans (3,582 or approximately 511/month) across all cancer types, and highest for lymphomas (3,966) and lung ($3,455) cancers. Conclusions: Total healthcare spending in the 6 months after a cancer diagnosis is considerable in the working-age population, with a high out-of-pocket burden for patients with private non-HMO coverage. Median spending in 6 months after cancer diagnosis (in 2021 dollars), adjusted for age and sex. Medical Care Plan Payments* Pharmacy Plan Payments* Out of Pocket Spending* Total Spending* Overall(n=31,793) Dual Medicaid/Medicare $24,081 $1,793 $19 $28,806 Medicaid $23,415 $641 $13 $26,887 Medicare TM $20,698 $797 $3,275 $27,028 Medicare MA $14,227 $570 $2,069 $19,152 Private non-HMO $51,196 $274 $3,582 $59,022 Private HMO $36,414 $219 $2,622 $42,916 Median costs significantly different across all payers, p&lt;0.05.

Enhancing Outcomes in Opioid Use Disorder Treatment: An Economic Evaluation of Improving Medication Adherence for Buprenorphine Through Blister-Packaging.

The opioid epidemic has severely impacted the US over the last 15 years. Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist indicated for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) and is recognized as an effective treatment when taken as prescribed. However, adherence rates have been low in real-world settings. Blister-packaging has been shown to promote medication adherence across a variety of disease states, although it has never been studied in OUD. An economic analysis was conducted to assess the impact of increased adherence of blister-packaged buprenorphine on health care resource utilization (HCRU) and health care costs for 10,000 patients initiating therapy for OUD. The model analyzed a commercially insured population within the US over a one-year time horizon. Medication adherence was defined in the model as proportion of days covered (PDC) of at least 80%. Literature-based references were used to inform both the impact of blister-packaging on the number of patients who became adherent as well as the impact of medication adherence on HCRU and health care costs. Model input uncertainty was assessed in one-way sensitivity analyses. With the implementation of blister-packaging buprenorphine, adherence rates increased from 37.1% of patients in the pre-intervention period to 45.3%, resulting in an additional 818 patients becoming adherent post-intervention. The increase in adherence led to a reduction of medical costs of $12,138,757 (-$1,214 per-patient (PP)). Specifically, inpatient costs decreased by $7,127,073 (-$713 PP) while outpatient costs decreased by $5,013,319 (-$501 PP). Pharmacy costs increased by $3,432,705 ($343 PP). Despite the increase in pharmacy costs, total health care costs saw a reduction of $8,559,684 (-$856 PP). Blister-packaging buprenorphine for treatment of OUD has potential to improve medication adherence and health outcomes while reducing HCRU and health care costs. Future studies are necessary to assess the real-world application and impact of blister-packaging buprenorphine for OUD across various patient populations and health care settings.

Use of coagulation factor concentrates and blood transfusion in cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study of adults with hereditary and acquired bleeding disorders

BackgroundCardiac surgery poses a significant risk of perioperative bleeding and allogeneic blood transfusions, particularly in patients with bleeding disorders. Increasingly frequent use of coagulation factor concentrates could impact haemorrhagic risks, thromboembolic events, and costs. We describe the use of coagulation factor concentrates and allogeneic blood products in cardiac surgical patients with hereditary and acquired bleeding disorders to assess pertinent outcomes, including perioperative haemorrhage, thromboembolism, and hospital costs. MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Premier Health Database, including adult cardiac surgical patients diagnosed with hereditary or acquired bleeding disorders compared with those without bleeding disorders. ResultsPatients with acquired bleeding disorders required more extensive use of coagulation factor concentrates and blood products compared with those with hereditary bleeding disorders or without bleeding disorders. The highest exposures to coagulation factor concentrates were found in the acquired bleeding disorders group, with 24% receiving factor VIIa and 11.7% receiving prothrombin complex concentrate. This group also experienced significantly higher rates of complications, including a 15.8% rate of haemorrhage and a 19.2% rate of thromboembolic events. The acquired bleeding disorders group had longer intensive care and hospital stays, and the highest mortality rate (19.2%). The increased use of perioperative replacement of factor VIII and factor IX in the hereditary bleeding disorders group led to increased pharmacy costs but did not significantly impact blood bank charges. ConclusionsAcquired bleeding disorders in cardiac surgery patients are associated with increased use of haemostatic interventions, postoperative complications, and increased healthcare costs. Improved management of perioperative haemostasis and thromboprophylaxis strategies are essential for optimising patient outcomes and reducing expenses.

Healthcare utilization and economics evaluation of paliperidone palmitate once-monthly in schizophrenia: a one-year, real-world, and retrospective mirror image study in China.

Investigation and analysis of the changes in healthcare resources and burden of schizophrenia in the real world before and after switching from oral antipsychotics (OAPs) to paliperidone palmitate once-monthly (PP1M) could provide evidence to clinicians and patients for choosing treatment modality and data support for health policy optimization. The first dosage of PP1M was set as mirror point, and patients with mirror point between January 2020 and June 2022 were recruited in the study. The differences in treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization, and costs within one year before and after the mirror point were compared. A total of 72 patients transitioning from OAPs to PP1M (mean age, 35.33 years; 43.06% female) were included in the study. Of the 72 patients, the application of PP1M resulted in a significant reduction in the hospitalization times, emergency room visits, and direct medical costs (P < 0.001), while the pharmacy cost and total cost increased by 222.57% (P < 0.001) and 16.35% (P < 0.001), respectively; PP1M accounted for 88.48% of the pharmacy cost. For patients with ≥1 hospitalization during the OAPs phase (n = 25), the number of hospitalizations, hospitalization days and hospitalization expenses decreased by more than 90% (P < 0.001). Total one-year expenses decreased by 37.67% (P < 0.001), and pharmacy expenses increased by 185.21% (P < 0.001). For patients with no hospitalizations during the OAPs phase (n = 47), emergency and outpatient visits decreased by 70% (P < 0.001) and 30.27% (P < 0.05), respectively, while the total cost increased by 117.56% (P < 0.001), and the pharmacy cost increased by 260.15% (P < 0.001) after initiation of PP1M treatment. After the transition to PP1M, the number of hospitalizations and outpatient and emergency department visits reduced, and healthcare resources were conserved. Switching to PP1M may be more economically beneficial for patients with prior hospitalizations while on OAP regimens. The high price of PP1M might be an obstacle to its widespread use.

Better Care, Same Cost - Reducing Unplanned Care for Multi-visit Patients: A Payer-Provider Model.

Many interventions implemented for multi-visit patients (MVP) have been developed to address patient-centric needs of these individuals and reduce unplanned care for ambulatory-sensitive conditions. More rigorous research is needed to better understand the impact of these interventions on changes in care utilization including unplanned care. To evaluate the impact of the Enhanced Care Program (ECP), a payer-provider collaborative model, on unplanned care use and cost of care. Using propensity methods, a comparison group was constructed using insurer membership files. Comparisons were performed using a difference-in-differences analysis. Patients enrolled in ECP through December 2019 were considered eligible for the study (n = 357). All patients had five or more ED visits in the past year or two or more inpatient hospitalizations in the past year prior to enrollment. ECP is a high-intensity outpatient intervention intended to reduce avoidable unplanned care such as ED visits and inpatient hospital stays through home visits, chronic/acute disease management, and intensive care coordination. The primary outcomes of interest were events per 100 members per year of ED use with return to home, unplanned inpatient and observational status admissions, and unplanned behavioral health inpatient admission, and cost of care per member per month. Overall total unplanned care encounters were significantly reduced with a difference-in-difference of 320 unplanned care encounters per 100 members per year in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The ECP group showed statistically significant decreases in costs of unplanned ED, unplanned observation admission, and unplanned inpatient behavioral medicine costs, but statistically significant increases in overall pharmacy costs and lab costs. Changes in total costs of care for the ECP group were not statistically different than the control group (p = 0.55). ECP showed significant reduction of unplanned care for MVP patients.

Adult Pharmacy Costs and Characteristics of Very High-Cost Prescription Drug Users in the United States, 2018–2022

Objective: This study sought to identify: (1) the demographic and clinical characteristics of very high-cost users (defined as patients with pharmaceutical expenditures that were equal to or greater than the 99th percentile), (2) whether or not these characteristics changed over time, (3) sociodemographic and clinical correlates of being very high-cost users, (4) the average pharmaceutical costs of very-high cost users, and (5) the therapeutic classes and medications that contributed to these high costs Background: There are growing public concerns about rising drug costs, in part due to increased availability, greater effectiveness, and market considerations. There is a concentrated portion of patients that accounts for a disproportionately large portion of pharmaceutical expenditures. Methods: A large serial cross-sectional study was conducted with De-identified, member-level pharmacy claims (n = 65,739,791) from a large, national pharmacy benefits manager from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022. The main outcome and measures were 2018–2022 pharmaceutical expenditures; amounts were adjusted for inflation to reflect 2022-dollar values. Results: Across the study period, the odds of being classified as a very high-cost user were 1.31 times as high for those 45–64 years old compared with those 18–44 years old (reference category); the odds were 1.42 times as high for males compared with females; 1.13 times as high before those identifying as non-Hispanic Black compared with non-Hispanic white; 1.11 times as high for those enrolled in a health care exchange plan compared with a commercial plan. In addition, very high-cost users lived in areas with higher social needs. Human immunodeficiency virus, inflammatory conditions, multiple sclerosis, and cancer accounted for the largest share of costs among this group. Conclusions: This study identified the unique characteristics of very high-cost pharmaceutical users and identified the top conditions and prescription drugs that drove high pharmaceutical expenditures among this population. These findings are essential to understanding rising pharmaceutical costs in the United States and can help identify the issues and solutions of specific cost drivers within our health care policies.

Modelling efficiency in primary healthcare using the DEA methodology: an empirical analysis in a healthcare district

BackgroundPrimary healthcare management efficiency conditions the functioning of specialized care and has a direct impact on the outcomes of the health system and its sustainability. The objective of this research is to develop models to evaluate the efficiency, including health outcomes, of the primary healthcare centres (PHC) of the Clínico – La Malvarrosa Health District in Valencia.MethodsTo evaluate efficiency, Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) was used with output orientation and variable returns to scale, with panel data from the years 2015 to 2019. In rates per 10,000 inhabitants, the inputs are: medical and nursing staff and pharmacy cost. The outputs are: number of consultations, hospital emergencies, referrals, avoidable hospitalisations, avoidable mortality and pharmaceutical prescription efficiency. As exogenous variables: the percentage of population over 65 years old, over 80 and case-mix. Three models were developed, all of them with the same inputs and different combinations of outputs related to: healthcare activity, outcomes, and both, in order to study the influence of the different approaches on efficiency. Each model is analysed both without exogenous variables and with each of them.ResultsThe efficiency results vary depending on the model used, although certain PHCs are always on, or very close to, the efficient frontier, while others are always inefficient. When healthcare activity outputs are considered, efficiency scores improve and the number of efficient PHCs increases. However, in general, the PHC score decreases throughout the evaluated period. This decrease is more pronounced when only activity outputs are included.ConclusionsDEA allows the inefficiencies of PHCs to be analysed and the efficient ones are clearly distinguished from the inefficient, although different efficiency scores are obtained depending on the model used. Evaluation can be according to healthcare activity, health outcomes or both, making it necessary to identify the expected objectives of the PHCs, as the perspective of the analysis influences the results.

Transoral Robotic Surgery Versus Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for OSA: A Cost Analysis Study.

Transoral robotic surgery (TORS) lingual tonsillectomy and hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) are effective surgical interventions for well-selected patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Previous publications have demonstrated that HGNS patients have a lower postoperative apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) and length of hospital stay than TORS patients. No prior study has investigated the differences in costs between HGNS and TORS. This study aims to compare surgery-related costs in patients undergoing HGNS versus TORS lingual tonsillectomy for OSA intolerant to CPAP. A retrospective study on OSA patients intolerant to CPAP that underwent HGNS or TORS from 2015 to 2022 at a tertiary care center. Cost was defined as the dollar amount associated with providing a specific service prior to the application of insurance. This study included 395 patients (375 UAS and 20 TORS). Average total cost was significantly higher in the UAS group than the TORS group (UAS: $25,582.60; TORS: $5832.60; p < 0.001). Operating room costs were also significantly higher in the UAS group (UAS: $1978.20; TORS: $1490.90; p = 0.001). The TORS cohort averaged higher costs for pharmacy (UAS: $201.30; TORS: $416.60; p < 0.001) and anesthesia (UAS: $139.00; TORS: $307.60; p < 0.001). The total cost was significantly higher in the UAS group compared to the TORS group. When making management decisions, it is important to consider the cost of care provided as well as patient-centered outcomes to optimize the value of care. N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

A propensity score matched cost analysis of robotic versus open hepatectomy

IntroductionCost-effectiveness of Robotic-assisted hepatectomy compared to the open approach is scrutinized. We compared the costs of robotic versus open hepatectomy at a large cancer center. MethodsPatients undergoing hepatectomy (1/2019-2/2022) were collected from a prospectively maintained database and 1:1 propensity score matched for 61 robotic and 61 open hepatectomy patients by complexity, tumor diagnosis, and age >65. Financial data was collected and converted to a ratio of service cost to average OR cost. Short-term and economic outcomes were compared. ResultsMedian length of stay (2 vs. 3 days), major complication rates (0% vs. 8.2%), and 90-day readmission rates (3.3% vs. 11.5%) were lower for robotic hepatectomy (all p < 0.05). Total 90-day perioperative costs were lower by 19.5% for the robotic cohort (mean 6.89 vs 8.56; p < 0.01). Intraoperative costs were higher in the robotic cohort (mean 2.75 vs. 2.44; p < 0.01). Cost reduction drivers during postoperative care were supplies (mean 0.26 vs. 0.75), laboratory (mean 0.27 vs. 0.49), regular surgery unit (mean 0.19 vs. 0.32), recovery room (mean 0.26 vs. 0.29) and pharmacy cost (median 0.21 vs. 0.32; all p < 0.05). DiscussionHospital costs of robotic hepatectomy were lower than those of open hepatectomy due to significantly reduced postoperative costs.

Total cost of care of Medicare Advantage beneficiaries participating in an appointment-based model in a national pharmacy chain.

The appointment-based model (ABM) is a pharmacy service to improve medication-related health outcomes. ABM involves medication synchronization and medication review, plus other services such as medication reconciliation, medication therapy management, vaccine administration, and multimedication packaging. ABM can improve medication adherence, but the economic impact is unknown. To assess the effect of a national pharmacy chain's ABM program for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries on total cost of care (TCOC). This study analyzed administrative claims data from April 7, 2017, through February 29, 2020, for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with Part D using a propensity score-matched cohort design. The national pharmacy chain provided a list of ABM participants. Eligibility criteria for the ABM and control (non-ABM) groups included age 65 years or older on the index date (initial participation, ABM; random fill date, control) and continuous enrollment from at least 6 months pre-index (baseline) date through at least 6 months post-index (follow-up) date. Medical inflation-adjusted (2020) TCOC was calculated as the sum of all health care spending from Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with Part D plan and patient paid amounts, standardized to per patient per month (PPPM), during the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included medication adherence calculated across prevalent maintenance therapeutic classes using proportion of days covered (PDC). Each group contained 5,225 patients with balanced characteristics after matching: 64% female, 73% White, mean age 75 years, mean Quan-Charlson comorbidity index score 0.9, and hypertension and dyslipidemia, each >65%. Median baseline all-cause PPPM health care costs in the ABM and control groups, respectively, were $517 and $548 ($221 and $234 medical, $135 and $164 pharmacy). Baseline PDC of at least 80% was 83% in the ABM group and, similarly, 84% in the control group. The mean (SD) follow-up was 604 (155) days for the ABM group and 598 (151) days for the control group. During the follow-up period, the median PPPM TCOC for the ABM group was $656 and was $723 for the control group (P = 0.011). Median pharmacy costs were also significantly less in the ABM group ($161 vs $193, P < 0.001), whereas median medical costs were $328 in the ABM group and $358 among controls (P = 0.254). More patients in the ABM group were adherent during follow-up, with 84% achieving PDC of at least 80% vs 82% among controls (P = 0.009). The ABM program was associated with significantly lower follow-up median total costs (medical and pharmacy), driven primarily by pharmacy costs. More patients were adherent in the ABM program. Payers and pharmacies can use this evidence to assess ABM programs for their members.

Health care resource utilization and direct costs incurred over 24 months after initiating galcanezumab or standard-of-care preventive migraine treatments in the United States.

Health care resource utilization (HCRU) and direct costs incurred over 12 months following initiation of galcanezumab (GMB) or standard-of-care (SOC) preventive migraine treatments have been evaluated. However, a gap in knowledge exists in understanding longer-term HCRU and direct costs. To compare all-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs in patients with migraine initiating GMB or SOC preventive migraine treatments over a 24-month follow-up. This retrospective study used Optum deidentified Market Clarity Data. The study included adults diagnosed with migraine, with at least 1 claim for GMB or SOC preventive migraine therapy (September 2018 to March 2020), with continuous enrollment for 12 months before and 24 months after (follow-up) the index date (date of first GMB or SOC claim). Propensity score (PS) matching (1:1) was used to balance cohorts. All-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs for GMB vs SOC cohorts were reported as mean (SD) per patient per year (PPPY) over a 24-month follow-up and compared using a Z-test. Costs were inflated to 2022 US$. After PS matching, 2,307 patient pairs (mean age: 44.4 years; female sex: 87.3%) were identified. Compared with the SOC cohort, the GMB cohort had lower mean (SD) PPPY all-cause office visits (17.9 [17.7] vs 19.1 [18.7]; P = 0.023) and migraine-related office visits (2.6 [3.3] vs 3.0 [4.7]; P = 0.002) at follow-up. No significant differences were observed between cohorts in other all-cause and migraine-related events assessed including outpatient visits, emergency department (ED) visits, inpatient stays, and other medical visits. The mean (SD) costs PPPY were lower in the GMB cohort compared with the SOC cohort for all-cause office visits ($4,321 [7,518] vs $5,033 [7,211]; P < 0.001) at follow-up. However, the GMB cohort had higher mean (SD) PPPY all-cause total costs ($24,704 [30,705] vs $21,902 [28,213]; P = 0.001) and pharmacy costs ($9,507 [12,659] vs $5,623 [12,605]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. Mean (SD) costs PPPY were lower in the GMB cohort for migraine-related office visits ($806 [1,690] vs $1,353 [2,805]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. However, the GMB cohort had higher mean (SD) PPPY migraine-related total costs ($8,248 [11,486] vs $5,047 [9,749]; P < 0.001) and migraine-related pharmacy costs ($5,394 [3,986] vs $1,761 [4,133]; P < 0.001) compared with the SOC cohort. There were no significant differences between cohorts in all-cause and migraine-related costs for outpatient visits, ED visits, inpatient stays, and other medical visits. Although total costs were greater for GMB vs SOC following initiation, changes in a few categories of all-cause and migraine-related HCRU and direct costs were lower for GMB over a 24-month follow-up. Additional analysis evaluating indirect health care costs may offer insights into further cost savings incurred with preventive migraine treatment.

A cost analysis of medications prescribed by vascular surgeons

ObjectiveVarious pharmaceutical cost options have been developed by multiple companies such as GoodRx, Amazon Pharmacy, Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drugs (CPD), Health Warehouse, and local retail pharmacies) to curb the cost of prescription medications prices that patients are having to bear. Vascular surgeons provide long-term continuity of care to patients with vascular disease who often require long-term medical management. This study sought to compare the different pharmaceutical options available for the most prescribed medications by vascular surgeons to their patients and to understand which of them are the most cost-effective. MethodsThe Medicare Part D catalog and vascular surgical literature were evaluated to identify which medications are most prescribed by vascular surgeons. The average price per tablet being paid by patients was identified using the Agency for Healthcare and Research database. The prices per tablet for each of the above pharmaceutical companies were found using online catalogs or coupons. The prices were then compared using analysis of variance and t-tests. ResultsAll four pharmaceutical cost options provide medication cost savings to patients compared with retail pharmacy costs. Analysis of variance showed that there were statistically significant differences among the different pharmaceutical cost options (F 15.44>2.36; P < .001). Mark Cuban CPD provided the most significant cost advantage over the other pharmaceutical options (P < .01). On a national scale, medications prescribed by vascular surgeons through Mark Cuban CPD could provide a 52% cost reduction to patients with vascular disease with a potential annual savings of over $3 billion dollars for the selected medications. ConclusionsCPD shows a strong potential for cost savings for patients commonly prescribed medications by vascular surgeons. As a specialty that provides long-term care and establishes long-term relationships with its patients, vascular surgeons have the unique ability to impact their overall health in a meaningful way by limiting the financial burdens associated with vascular-based medication acquisition and utilization.

Budget impact analysis of including biosimilar adalimumab on formulary: A United States payer perspective.

The biosimilar market is growing rapidly, as evidenced by 41 approvals and 37 launches to date. As adalimumab biosimilars launch in the United States, competition among biosimilar and reference adalimumab will likely increase across multiple reference indications, including rheumatology, dermatology, and gastrointestinal diseases, which may lead to decreased payer costs. To evaluate the costs of adding biosimilar adalimumab to a US commercial plan by exploring various utilization and price differential scenarios. A 3-year budget impact model for a US commercial plan of 1 million people was developed to assess switching from reference adalimumab or any self-injectable reference tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor to biosimilar adalimumab. Pharmacy and medical costs were analyzed through high- and low-conversion scenarios from reference adalimumab and the TNF inhibitor class. Price reductions of 5% to 60% relative to reference adalimumab based on previous biosimilar launches were also explored. Short-term medical costs were evaluated as additional simple and complex office visits, with scenarios of half of switch patients having 1 visit up to all switch patients having 10 visits. In a target population of 1,863 patients, switching from reference adalimumab to biosimilar adalimumab had cumulative cost savings of $5,756,073 with slow conversion (10%-20% over 3 years) and $28,780,365 with fast conversion (50%-100% over 3 years). Similar results were seen when switching from any other self-injectable reference TNF inhibitor. Cost savings more than $1 million were seen with a 10% conversion from reference adalimumab and a 15% price reduction from reference adalimumab. Additional office visit scenarios had a negligible impact on budget, with no changes in per-member-per-month costs until all switch patients had 10 additional complex visits, in which per-member-per-month costs increased by $0.02. In a hypothetical plan of 1 million lives, use of biosimilar adalimumab in commercial plans can lead to significant cost savings for payers because of increased competition. Greater and faster biosimilar conversion rates from reference adalimumab and other reference TNF inhibitors resulted in decreased costs. Additionally, even with short-term medical expenditures, cost savings were still realized when switching to biosimilar adalimumab.

Cost analysis of patiromer vs sodium zirconium cyclosilicate for the treatment of hyperkalemia in Spain and the UK

Background Hyperkalemia is an electrolyte abnormality with potentially life-threatening consequences. Published data have shown that potassium-binding polymer patiromer (Veltassa) is associated with reduced rates of severe edema and hospitalization for heart failure compared with sodium zirconium cyclosilicate (SZC, Lokelma) when treating hyperkalemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible costs associated with these interventions in the Spanish and UK settings. Methods A cost-analysis model was developed in Microsoft Excel to compare the costs associated with patiromer and SZC for the management of hyperkalemia. Clinical event rates were taken from a published real-world comparative study, with the base case capturing the statistically significant reduction in severe edema with patiromer vs SZC and a sensitivity analysis also including the non-statistically significant reduction in hospitalization for heart failure. Country-specific costs, expressed in 2022 Euros (EUR) and British pounds sterling (GBP), were evaluated from a healthcare payer perspective and included pharmacy costs and costs of clinical events. Results Patiromer may be associated with cost savings of EUR 107 and GBP 630 per patient-year of treatment vs SZC in Spain and the UK, respectively. The majority of cost savings were due to the possible lower daily cost of patiromer compared with SZC. Including the difference in heart failure hospitalization rates in a sensitivity analysis led to greater cost savings with patiromer over SZC, increasing to EUR 460 and GBP 902 in Spain and the UK, respectively. Extrapolation of patient-level economic outcomes to a population level found that patiromer was associated with annual cost savings of EUR 30.6 million in Spain, and GBP 801.7 million in the UK vs SZC. Conclusions Patiromer has the potential to be cost saving vs SZC for the treatment of hyperkalemia in Spain and the UK based on the results of a real-world evidence analysis.