Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy Research Articles

Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy and Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis, with or without Iliac Vein Stenting, in the Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis.

This study aims to evaluate and compare the outcomes and clinical efficacy of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMCT) plus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) and PMCT combined with CDT and venous stenting in managing acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT), while also assessing the long-term safety and efficacy of these interventions. A retrospective case-control study spanning 3 years involved 112 patients presenting with acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT), each with a symptom duration of less than 14 days. Patients were consecutively categorized into two groups based on individual clinical indications: PMCT + CDT vs. PMCT + CDT + venous stent. Statistical analyses were conducted to compare clinical features and outcomes between the two groups. Additionally, patients were followed up for 24 months post-treatment, during which quality of life (QoL) and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) were analyzed. In this retrospective study, we analyzed a total of 112 consecutive patients, with 63 patients undergoing PMCT + CDT and 49 patients undergoing PMCT + CDT + venous stent. Between the two groups, regarding primary outcomes at 6 months, there was no difference in the observed cumulative patency rates, standing at 82.5% for PMCT + CDT and 81.6% for PMCT + CDT + stent. Survival analyses for primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency yielded comparable results for PMCT + CDT, with p-values of 0.74, 0.58, and 0.72, respectively. The two-year patency rate was high in both groups (85.7% for PMCT + CDT vs. 83.7% for PMCT + CDT + stent). Additionally, during the follow-up period, there were no statistically significant differences observed in the incidence of PTS or the average Villalta score between the two groups. At 24 months post-intervention, the incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) was 11.1% in the PMCT + CDT group and 22% in the PMCT + CDT + stent group (p = 0.381). Both treatment arms of the study groups experienced bleeding complications during the thrombolysis therapy; in the PMCT + CDT group, there were three cases of gastrointestinal bleeding, compared to two cases in the PMCT + CDT + stent group (p = 0.900). Additionally, there was one intracranial hemorrhage in the PMCT + CDT group and two in the PMCT + CDT + stent group. Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMCT) combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) therapy has shown significant efficacy in alleviating leg symptoms and reducing the occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), including the incidence of moderate-to-severe PTS. On the other hand, the utilization of PMCT + CDT + stent therapy, tailored to individual patients' clinical and venous conditions, may enhance long-term venous patency and lead to superior outcomes, including improved quality of life parameters.

Current Evidence for Endovascular Therapies in the Management of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Acute lower extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT), specifically proximal iliofemoral DVT, is a relatively common disorder that can result in a chronic debilitating post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS), with a significant effect on a patient's quality of life. Anticoagulation is first-line therapy; however, percutaneous interventions have emerged as treatment options for patients where there is concern that anticoagulation alone will not resolve the DVT as well as prevent PTS. This paper will discuss the existing data on these interventions and review current endovascular techniques, including catheter-directed thrombolysis, pharmacomechanical thrombectomy, and large-bore mechanical thrombectomy in the management of DVT.

Venous Microtrauma Associated with Pharmaco-Mechanical Thrombectomy in A Porcine DVT Model

Venous Microtrauma Associated with Pharmaco-Mechanical Thrombectomy in A Porcine DVT Model

A Retrospective Study Comparing Pharmacomechanical Thrombectomy with Catheter-Directed Thrombolysis for Acute Deep Venous Thrombosis

PurposeThis study aims to conduct a comparative analysis of the clinical efficacy and safety between pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) in the context of acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT). Materials and MethodsA retrospective review of our institution's patient database spanning from February 2011 to December 2019 was performed to identify cases of acute LEDVT. The patients were categorized into two distinct groups based on the thrombolytic interventions administered: the PMT group, specifically denoting PMT with AngioJet in our investigation, and the CDT group. Comprehensive data sets encompassing patient demographics, risk factors, procedural specifics, thrombolysis grading, and complications were collected. Subsequent follow-up evaluations at the two-year mark post-treatment included assessments of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and the quality of life (QOL). ResultsAmong the 348 patients identified (mean age: 50.12 ± 15.87 years; 194 females), 200 underwent catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) during the early stage (2011 to 2017), while 148 received pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) between 2017 and 2019. Baseline data between the two groups exhibited no statistically significant differences. Thrombus scores significantly decreased in both cohorts post-therapy (each p < 0.001).Patients subjected to PMT demonstrated higher thrombolysis rates (77.35±9.44% vs 50.85±6.72%), reduced administration of the thrombolytic agent urokinase [20(20-20) vs 350(263-416), p < 0.001], larger limb circumference differences (above the knee: 6.03±1.76cm vs 4.51±1.82cm, p < 0.001; below the knee: 2.90±1.16cm vs 2.51±0.90cm, p < 0.001), and shorter lengths of stay (7.19±3.11 days vs 12.33±4.77 days, p < 0.001). However, the PMT group exhibited a higher decline in hemoglobin levels (13.41±10.59 g/L vs 10.88±11.41 g/L, p = 0.038) and an increase in creatinine levels [9.58(2.32-15.82) umol/L vs 4.53(2.87-6.08) umol/L, p < 0.001] compared to the CDT group. No statistically significant differences were observed in the numbers of balloon angioplasty, stent implantation (each p > 0.050), and minor and major complications between the two groups. At the 1-year follow-up, post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) occurred in 13.51% of the PMT group compared to 26% of the CDT group (p = 0.025), with a higher incidence of moderate-severe PTS in the CDT group (8% vs 2.7%, p = 0.036). At the 2-year follow-up, PTS was observed in 16.2% of the PMT group and 31.5% in the CDT group, p = 0.004. Preoperative and postoperative D-values of SF-36 PCS and SF-36 MCS showed no statistically significant between-group differences. ConclusionIn our institutional experience, both pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) have proven to be effective and safe therapeutic approaches for managing acute lower-extremity deep venous thrombosis (LEDVT). PMT, in particular, demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving thrombosis resolution and mitigating the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome, affirming its role as a favorable intervention in this clinical context.

Single-procedure 8Fr rheolytic pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis

PurposeWe hypothesize that single-procedure venous-specific rheolytic thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (DVT) will result in improved clinical symptoms as measured by the venous clinical severity score (VCSS), as well as durable venous patency, with decreased hemorrhagic risks and costs associated with conventional catheter-directed therapy and prolonged lytic exposure.Materials and methodsThirty-three consecutive patients with symptomatic, unilateral, iliofemoral DVT who were treated with single-procedure therapy using the 8Fr rheolytic thrombectomy catheter were retrospectively analyzed from 2012–2021. ed data included technical success (> 95% clearance of acute thrombus), adverse events (AEs), and clinical and imaging outcomes at 1-month and 1-year.ResultsTechnical success was achieved in all 33 patients. Mean pre-procedure VCSS was 7.5 with mean edema and pain sub-scores of 2.6 and 1.8, respectively. Post-procedural total mean VCSS at one month was significantly improved (mean post-procedure VCSS = 0.3, mean reduction of 7.2, P < 0.01). Clinical improvement was sustained at 1-year (mean total VCSS = 0.2, P < 0.01). Primary patency was achieved in all patients at 1-month and 30 (91%) patients at 1-year. Among the 3 patients in which primary patency was not achieved at 1-year, primary-assisted patency was achieved in 2 patients. Secondary patency was achieved in the remaining patient at 1-year. No hemorrhagic AEs occurred in this study.ConclusionThis study suggests that single-procedure venous-specific rheolytic thrombectomy for treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT is safe and effective, resulting in durable clinical and radiographic results at one year, while also limiting hemorrhagic risks, mitigating costs of admission, and expediting patient discharge.

Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with Angiojet in acute arterial occlusions: A prospective study among the results and outcomes.

The main objective of this present paper was to evaluate the results and outcomes of patients with acute limb ischemia (ALI) submitted to pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) endovascular surgery with Angiojet, regarding the number of cycles/pumps. Prospective, consecutive cohort study of ALI patients submitted to PMT endovascular intervention subdivided into two groups according to the number of cycles in the Angiojet technique: Group 1 higher than 150 cycles/second and Group 2 lesser than 150 cycles/second (cycles/s). Overall, 92 patients with ALI submitted to PMT were evaluated. Two groups of patients were identified: Group 1 higher than 150 cycles/s with 60 patients and Group 2 lesser than 150 cycles/s with 32 patients. The overall mortality rate (OMR) was 15.1% (13 patients) in total cohort within the first 30 days. Group 1 had a higher OMR than Group 2 (16.1% vs 9.3%, p = 0.007). There were 4 cases of hematuria (4.3%), all of them in Group 1. We have performed a Kaplan-Meier regarding limb salvage rates: Group 1 had 85% and Group 2 had 95.7% at 1057 days. P = 0.081. Among the factors evaluated, the following were related to overall mortality rate: PMT with higher >150 cycles/s (HR = 7.17, p = 0.007, CI: 1.38-8.89), COVID-19 infection (HR = 2.75, p = 0.010, CI = 1.73-5.97), and post-operative acute kidney injury (HR = 2.97, p < 0.001, CI = 1.32-8.13). Among the factors evaluated, the following was related to limb loss: post-operative acute kidney injury (HR = 4.41, p = 0.036, CI: 1.771-7.132), probably because patients experiencing limb loss have a higher incidence of acute renal insufficiency due to higher circulating myoglobin higher hemolysis from the increased Angiojet cycles inducing rhabdomyolysis. PMT with Angiojet is a safe and effective therapy in patients with ALI. However, patients receiving greater than 150 cycles/s were noted to have higher rates of acute kidney injury and mortality. This is likely reflective of increased thrombus burden and higher rates of hemolysis. Acute kidney injury, greater than 150 cycles/s, and COVID-19 infection were the variables with the strongest association to perioperative mortality.

Initial experience with the ambulatory management of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with May-Thurner syndrome with percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy, angioplasty and stenting

ObjectivePatients undergoing intervention for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT) with May-Thurner syndrome (MTS) typically require inpatient (IP) hospitalization for initial treatment with anticoagulation and management with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy. Direct oral anticoagulants and percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) devices offer the opportunity for outpatient (OP) management. We describe our approach with these patients. MethodsPatients receiving intervention for acute IFDVT from January 2020 through October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients undergoing unilateral thrombectomy, venous angioplasty, and stenting for IFDVT with MTS comprised the study population and were divided into two groups: (1) patients admitted to the hospital and treated as IPs and (2) patients who underwent therapy as OPs. The two groups were compared regarding demographics, risk factors, procedural success, complications, and follow-up. ResultsA total of 92 patients were treated for IFDVT with thrombectomy, angioplasty, and stenting of whom 58 comprised the IP group and 34 the OP group. All 92 patients underwent PMT using the Inari ClotTriever (Inari Medical), intravascular ultrasound, angioplasty, and stenting with 100% technical success. Three patients in the IP group required adjuvant thrombolysis. There was no difference in primary patency of the treated IFDVT segment at 12 months between the two groups (IP, 73.5%; OP, 86.7%; P = .21, log-rank test). ConclusionsPatients with acute IFDVT and MTS deemed appropriate for thrombectomy and iliac revascularization can be managed with initiation of ambulatory direct oral anticoagulant therapy and subsequent return for ambulatory PMT, angioplasty, and stenting. This approach avoids the expense of IP care and allows for effective use of resources at a time when staffing and supply chain shortages have led to inefficiencies in the provision of IP care for nonemergent conditions.

The emerging role of mechanical thrombectomy in acute DVT management.

Catheter directed thrombolysis (CDT) and pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in various technical combinations have been the main driver of acute deep venous interventions for over a decade. While the majority of high-level evidence was based on it, CDT requires longer procedural care and is associated to a small but not negligible bleeding risk. Contemporary DVT intervention, following the paradigm shift in myocardial infarction and stroke management, has steadily migrated towards minimizing or eliminating thrombolytics due to the introduction of mechanical/aspiration thrombectomy. Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) devices are undoubtedly improving our ability to remove thrombus more efficiently in a single session without the adverse events and complex logistics related to the use of thrombolytics.

Analysis of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Indications and Retrieval Rates at an Academic Medical Center in Appalachia

Introduction: Inferior vena cava (IVC) filters are placed for prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a contraindication to anticoagulation. Additional clinical indications for IVC filters, such as pre-operative prophylaxis for VTE and extensive VTE, are controversial and vary across clinical guidelines. Current guidelines recommend that IVC filters be retrieved after resolution of their clinical indication. A common problem is failure to retrieve IVC filters when indicated, resulting in prolonged or indefinite placement of these devices. Failure to remove IVC filters contributes to an increased risk of filter-associated complications such as device migration, embolization to the cardiopulmonary circulation, perforation and increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The goal of this study is to identify IVC filter indications and retrieval statistics at our academic medical center in Appalachia. We seek to compare our performance to national averages, identify the reasons for failure of retrieval in our patient population and develop quality improvement initiatives to improve our performance. Methods: An IRB-approved, single-institution, retrospective chart review was conducted for all patients who had an IVC filter placed between January 2020 and December 2022 at West Virginia University Hospital. Patient demographics, comorbidities, placement indications, retrieval statistics and filter-associated complications were obtained from the electronic medical record (EMR). Patients who had a permanent IVC filter placed were excluded from the final analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and Chi squared tests where appropriate to compare the retrieval and failure of retrieval groups. Results: The study sample (n=450) had a mean age of 65.3±15.4 years and was comprised of 54.2% males and 45.8% females. West Virginia residents comprised 82.4% of the study sample. The most common reported clinical indications for placement included VTE with a contraindication to anticoagulation (62.4%), preoperative prophylaxis for VTE (15.8%), extensive VTE (15.3%), pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (15.0%) or other (3.1%). The rate of IVC filter retrieval was 25.4% (n=114). The most common reasons for failure of retrieval were loss to follow-up (31.8%), other reasons including provider or patient preference (31.5%), patient death (28.3%), clinical indication remains present (5.7%) and unsuccessful retrieval (2.7%). Patients in the failure of retrieval group (n=114) were significantly older (69 vs 61 years, p&amp;lt;0.001) and had a higher frequency of clinical indications for history of VTE with a contraindication to anticoagulation (231 vs 50 patients, p&amp;lt;0.0001) and extensive VTE (49 vs 20 patients, p&amp;lt;0.0001) compared to retrieval group (n=336). There was a nonsignificant trend toward greater frequency of chronic conditions in the failure of retrieval group including cancer history (101 vs 26 patients, p=0.15), heart failure (44 vs 11, p=0.41) and hypercoagulable disease (16 vs 2 patients, p=0.26). Conclusions: Our institution had a lower IVC filter retrieval rate than the estimated average of 34% reported in a systematic review by Angel et al. Patients with comorbid conditions tended to not undergo retrieval, predisposing them to a higher risk of filter-associated complications. A history of VTE with a contraindication to anticoagulation was the most common clinical indication for placement, but the other most common indications are not universally guideline recommended which identified an area of opportunity for multidisciplinary provider education. Patient loss to follow-up is the predominant reason for failure of retrieval at our institution, which is consistent with the healthcare disparity faced by our predominantly rural, Appalachian patient population of travelling long distances to our tertiary center to obtain specialty care. Quality improvement strategies to mitigate this limitation in the context of IVC filter placement through close local follow-up for timely reassessment, retrieval evaluation and removal will be developed.

Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy of iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis is associated with a low incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome and perioperative complications.

Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis (IFDVT) is associated with an incidence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) of up to 50%. PTS is associated with high morbidity, impaired quality of life and a significant economic burden. The aim of the current study was to assess the impact of a single session pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT), dedicated venous stents and a risk mitigation protocol on the rate of PTS. Between 2015 and 2022, patients presenting with acute or subacute IFDVT treated with the same protocol of single session PMT, dedicated venous stents, and risk-mitigation measures were included. Procedural success rate, complications, stent patency and incidence of PTS were determined. Of 60 patients (58 ± 19 years; 65% male), the procedural success rate was 93%, with 7% of patients experiencing complications but no long-term sequelae or mortality. Most (n = 52; 87%) patients were stented, including 46% across the inguinal ligament. At 3 months post-procedure, primary, assisted primary and secondary stent patency rates were 89%, 93% and 98%, respectively, with no loss of patency or re-interventions after that. At latest follow-up of a median 48 months (n = 32), stent patency rate was 97%, with only three patients (9%) experiencing symptoms of PTS. Single session PMT, dedicated venous stents and a risk-mitigation protocol results in high success rate, excellent long-term stent patency and low incidence of PTS without compromising safety. These results support early intervention for iliofemoral DVT.

Saddle Shaped Thrombus at Subclavian-Vertebral Artery Junction

Acute upper limb ischemia is an uncommon but dreaded cardiovascular emergency. Severity of symptoms is dependent upon the site of the arterial occlusion and the extent of the collateral blood supply around the shoulder and elbow region. The most common cause of occlusion in subclavian artery is thromboembolic occlusion. Rheolytic pharmaco mechanical thrombectomy effectively removed the heavy thrombus after placing an embolic protection device in the vertebral artery. Good recanalization was achieved precluding the need of stenting.

Coagulation-monitored, dose-adjusted catheter-directed thrombolysis or pharmaco-mechanical thrombus removal in deep vein thrombosis.

Background: Pharmaco-mechanical thrombectomy (PMT) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) are therapeutic options for selected patients with acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Patients and methods: We aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes of 159 patients with symptomatic iliofemoral DVT undergoing PMT alone, CDT alone, or CDT followed by PMT (bail-out) in the Swiss Venous Stent Registry. The primary outcome was the incidence of peri-interventional major and minor bleeding complications (ISTH criteria). Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PTS and stent patency after 3 years. Results: Mean age was 49±20 years and 58% were women. DVT involved the iliac veins in 99% of patients, whereas 53% had an underlying iliac vein compression. PMT alone was used in 40 patients, CDT alone in 77, and 42 received initial CDT followed by bail-out PMT due to insufficient thrombus clearance. Single-session PMT was the preferred approach in patients with iliac vein compression, patent popliteal vein, and absence of IVC thrombus. Patients treated with PMT alone received a lower r-tPA dose (median 10 mg, IQR 10-10) vs. those treated with CDT (20 mg, IQR 10-30). The rate of peri-interventional major bleeding was 0%, 1%, and 2%, whereas that of minor bleeding was 0%, 1%, and 12%, respectively, all occurring during CDT. After 3 years, PTS occurred in 6%, 9%, and 7% of patients, respectively. The primary stent patency rate was 95%, 88%, and 83%, respectively. Conclusions: The use of PMT and CDT for iliofemoral DVT was overall safe and resulted in high long-term patency and treatment success. Given the less severe presentation of DVT, single-session PMT appeared to be characterized by numerically better primary patency and lower perioperative bleeding event rates than CDT.

Analysis and results of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with AngioJet in acute arterial occlusions: a prospective comparison study among the number of cycles and outcomes

Analysis and results of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with AngioJet in acute arterial occlusions: a prospective comparison study among the number of cycles and outcomes

Comparative outcomes of catheter-directed thrombolysis versus AngioJet pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of pharmacomechanical thrombolysis and thrombectomy (PCDT) plus catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) vs CDT alone for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and summarize the clinical experience, safety outcomes, and short- and long-term efficacy. MethodsWe performed a 4-year retrospective, case-control study. A total of 95 consecutive patients with acute symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT) with a symptom duration of ≤7 days involving the iliac and/or common femoral veins underwent endovascular interventions. The patients were divided into two groups according to their clinical indications: PCDT plus CDT vs CDT alone. Statistical analyses were used to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between the two groups. Additionally, the patients were followed up for 3 to 36 months after treatment, and the proportions of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) and moderate to severe PTS were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method. ResultsA total of 95 consecutive patients were analyzed in this retrospective study, of whom, 51 underwent CDT alone and 44 underwent PCDT plus CDT. Between the two groups, in terms of immediate-term efficacy and safety, significant differences were found in the catheter retention time (60.64 ± 12.04 hours vs 19.42 ± 4.04 hours; P < .001), dosages of urokinase required (5.82 ± 0.81 million units vs 1.80 ± 0.64 million units; P < .001), the detumescence rate at 24 hours postoperatively (48.46% ± 8.62% vs 76.79% ± 7.98%; P = .026), the descent velocity of D-dimer per day (2266.28 ± 1358.26 μg/L/D vs 3842.34 ± 2048.02 μg/L/D; P = .018), total hospitalization stay (6.2 ± 1.40 days vs 3.8 ± 0.70 days; P = .024), number of postoperative angiograms (2.4 ± 0.80 vs 1.2 ± 0.30; P = .042), and grade III venous patency (>95% lysis: 54.5% vs 68.6%; P = .047). Furthermore, during the follow-up period, significant differences were found in the incidence of PTS (Villalta scale ≥5 or a venous ulcer: 47.0% vs 27.7%; P = .037), and the incidence proportion of moderate to severe PTS at 12 months (15.7% vs 4.5%; P = .024) and 24 months (35.3% vs 11.4%; P = .016). ConclusionsCompared with CDT alone, in the iliofemoral DVT subgroup with a symptom duration of ≤7 days, PCDT plus CDT could significantly relieve early leg symptoms, shorten the hospitalization stay, reduce bleeding complications, promote long-term venous patency, and decrease the occurrence of PTS and the incidence proportion of moderate to severe PTS. Thus, the short- and long-term outcomes both support the superiority of PCDT plus CDT vs CDT in this subgroup.

Results of a Flexible Patient-Centered Approach to the Timing of Thoracic Outlet Decompression in Paget Schroetter Syndrome

Treatment algorithms for subclavian vein (SCV) effort thrombosis (Paget-Schroetter syndrome- PSS) are multiple, ranging from thrombolysis (TL) with immediate or delayed thoracic outlet decompression (TOD) to conservative treatment with anticoagulation alone. We follow a regimen of TL / pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) followed by TOD with first rib resection, scalenectomy, venolysis and selective venoplasty (open or endovascular) performed electively at a time convenient for the patient. Oral anticoagulants are prescribed for 3 months or longer based upon response. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of this flexible protocol. Clinical and procedural details of consecutive patients treated for PSS from Jan 2001 to August 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Endpoints included success of TL and eventual clinical outcome. Patients were divided into two groups-Group I: TL/PMT + TOD; Group II: medical management / anticoagulation + TOD. PSS was diagnosed in 114 patients; 104 (62 female, mean age 31 years) who underwent TOD were included in the study. Group I: 53 patients underwent TOD after initial TL / PMT (23 at our institution and 30 elsewhere) with success (acute thrombus resolution) in 80% (n=20) and 72% (n=24) respectively. Adjunctive balloon-catheter venoplasty was performed in 67%. TL failed to recanalize the occluded SCV in 11% (n=6). Complete thrombus resolution was seen in 9% (n=5). Residual chronic thrombus in 79% (n=42) resulted in median SCV stenosis of 50% (range 10 to 80%). With continued anticoagulation, further thrombus retraction was noted with median 40% improvement in stenosis including in veins with unsuccessful TL. TOD was performed at a median of 1.5 months (range 2 - 8months). Re-thrombosis of the SCV occurred in 3 patients 1-3 days postoperatively and was managed with MT / SCV stenting/balloon angioplasty and anticoagulation. Symptomatic relief was achieved in 49/53 (92%) patients at a median follow up of 14 months. 51 patients underwent TOD following medical treatment elsewhere with anticoagulation alone for an average 6 months (range 2-18 months) with recurrent SCV thrombosis in 5 (11%). Thirty-nine patients (76%) had persistent symptoms; the remaining had asymptomatic compression of the SCV with maneuvers. SCV occlusion persisted in 4 patients (7%); the indication for TOD being residual symptoms from compression of collateral veins, the median residual stenosis was 70% (range 30-90%). TOD was performed at a median of 6 months after diagnosis of PSS. Open venous reconstruction with endovenectomy and patch was performed in 4 patients and stenting in 2. Symptomatic relief was achieved in 46/51 (90%) at a median follow up of 24 months. For Paget Schroetter syndrome a management protocol encompassing elective thoracic outlet decompression at a convenient time following thrombolysis is safe and effective, with low risk of re-thrombosis. Continued anticoagulation in the interim results in further recanalization of the subclavian vein and may reduce the need for open venous reconstruction.

Early outcomes of mantis pharmacomechanical thrombectomy system combined with catheter-directed thrombolysis for treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis

Aim: The purpose of this research was to investigate the early outcomes of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy (PMT) with the Mantis device and adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) for the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (IFDVT). Material and Methods: Twenty patients with symptomatic acute IFDVT were successfully treated with the Mantis rotational thrombectomy device and CDT, between August 2020 and March 2021. Patients' demographical, clinical and follow-up data were obtained and analysed retrospectively. Villalta and Pain Severity scores were utilized to assess the patients for the occurrence of post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS). Results: The procedural success rate was 100%. All cases presented early clinical improvement. No device related complications were encountered. Reocclusion was observed in 3 (15%) patients. Pre-procedural median pain score was 7 (range: 6–8) and 1 (range: 0–7) at 12-month following thrombectomy (P &lt; .001). Pre-procedural median Villalta score was 7 (range: 3–11) and 1 (range: 0–13) at 12-month following thrombectomy (P&lt;.001). At 12-month follow-up, no PTS was reported in 15 (75%) patients, mild PTS was reported in 2 (10%) patients, moderate PTS was reported in 2 (10%) patients and no severe PTS was observed. Conclusion: The Mantis PMT system with CDT seems to be an efficient treatment approach for acute IFDVT with encouraging early results.

Right-Sided May-Thurner Syndrome in a Patient with Left-Sided Inferior Vena Cava and Recent COVID-19 Infection

Background: May-Thurner Syndrome (MTS) is a rare vascular condition where the left common iliac vein is compressed between the right common iliac artery and the spine. We report a case of a patient with a left-sided inferior vena cava and right-sided May-Thurner syndrome. He had recent symptomatic COVID infection despite vaccination (Janssen). Case: A 28-year-old male presented with right lower extremity pain and swelling for three weeks. A duplex ultrasound was performed revealing iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. Pharmacomechanical thrombectomy with ultrasound assisted thrombolysis was performed with subsequent femoral venogram and angioplasty of the right common iliac vein. Conclusion: May-Thurner Syndrome often remains underdiagnosed due to the chronic nature of the disease process. The presence of a left-sided IVC leading to right sided MTS with recent COVID-19 infection (and vaccination) was a unique feature of this case. May-Thurner Syndrome should be considered in the differential diagnosis of those present with DVTs or symptoms of venous hypertension.

The effects of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy on novel complete blood count parameters in deep vein thrombosis: A retrospective study.

This study aimed to investigate the effects of pharmacomechanical thrombectomy on novel complete blood count parameters in deep venous thrombosis. This retrospective study included 242 patients aged >18 years who were treated for deep venous thrombosis. Patients were grouped as follows: group 1 was accepted as having interventional operations (n = 123) and group 2 was accepted as having only medical advice (n = 119). Routine complete blood count parameters, the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were compared. There was no difference between the groups in terms of admission hemoglobin, hematocrit, mean platelet volume, NLR and PLR (P = .11, P = .24, P = .55, P = .93, and P = .96, respectively). In the pharmacomechanic thrombectomy group, NLR and PLR were significantly reduced after intervention when compared to the admission values (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively). However, the NLR and PLR values of medically treated patients did not differ significantly from their baseline values (P = .16 and P = .08, respectively). In this study, we effectively removed the thrombus load in blocked proximal veins using pharmacomechanical thrombectomy and observed a significant decrease in NLR and PLR, which are current, inexpensive, and accessible parameters.

Clinical outcomes of AngioJet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolysis for the treatment of filter-related caval thrombosis.

The inferior vena cava filter is utilized worldwide to intercept thrombi and to reduce the risk of fatal pulmonary embolism (PE). However, filter-related thrombosis is a complication of filter implantation. Endovascular methods such as AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy (ART) and catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) can treat filter-related caval thrombosis, but the clinical outcomes of both treatment modalities have not been determined. To compare the treatment outcomes of AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy vs catheter-directed thrombolysis in patients with filter-related caval thrombosis. In this single-center retrospective study, 65 patients (34 males and 31 females; mean age: 59.0 ± 13.43 years) with intrafilter and inferior vena cava thrombosis were enrolled between January 2021 and August 2022. These patients were assigned to either the AngioJet group (n = 44) or the CDT group (n = 21). Clinical data and imaging information were collected. Evaluation measures included thrombus clearance rate, periprocedural complications, urokinase dosage, incidence of PE, limb circumference difference, length of stay, and filter removal rate. Technical success rates were 100% in the AngioJet and CDT groups. In the AngioJet group, grade II and grade III thrombus clearance was achieved in 26 (59.09%) and 14 (31.82%) patients, respectively. In the CDT group, grade II and grade III thrombus clearance was accomplished in 11 (52.38%) patients and 8 (38.10%) patients, respectively (P > 0.05).The peridiameter difference of the thigh was significantly reduced in patients from both groups after treatment (P < 0.05). The median dosage of urokinase was 0.08 (0.02, 0.25) million U in the AngioJet group and 1.50 (1.17, 1.83) million U in the CDT group (P < 0.05). Minor bleeding was shown in 4 (19.05%) patients in the CDT group, and when it was compared with that in the AngioJet group, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). No major bleeding occurred. Seven (15.91%) patients in the AngioJet group had hemoglobinuria and 1 (4.76%) patient in the CDT group had bacteremia. There were 8 (18.18%) patients with PE in the AngioJet group and 4 (19.05%) patients in the CDT group before the intervention (P > 0.05). Computed tomography angiopulmonography (CTA) showed that PE was resolved after the intervention. New PE occurred in 4 (9.09%) patients in the AngioJet group and in 2 (9.52%) patients in the CDT group after theintervention (P > 0.05). These cases of PE were asymptomatic. The mean length of stay was longer in the CDT group (11.67 ± 5.34 d) than in the AngioJet group (10.64 ± 3.52 d) (P < 0.05). The filter was successfully retrieved in the first phase in 10 (47.62%) patients in the CDT group and in 15 (34.09%) patients in the AngioJet group (P > 0.05).Cumulative removal was accomplished in 17 (80.95%) out of 21 patients in the CDT group and in 42 (95.45%) out of 44 patients in the ART group (P > 0.05). The median indwelling time for patients with successful retrieval was 16 (13139) d in the CDT group and 59 (12231) d in the ART group (P > 0.05). Compared with catheter-directed thrombolysis, AngioJet rheolytic thrombectomy can achieve similar thrombus clearance effects, improve the filter retrieval rate, reduce the urokinase dosage and lower the risk of bleeding events in patients with filter-related caval thrombosis.

Angiojet pharmacomechanical thrombectomy versus anticoagulant therapy alone in massive cancer-associated thrombosis: a single centre retrospective cohort study.

The therapeutic regimen option for the cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) patients is still a major clinical challenge. The present study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis (PCDT) with AngioJet treatment compared with the conventional anticoagulation alone therapy in the patients with CAT. We retrospectively reviewed the patients who underwent PCDT and/or anticoagulation for the treatment of CAT between August 1, 2016 and March 1, 2022. Each patient was divided into the PCDT group or the anticoagulation alone group. The baseline demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, treatment details, course data were reviewed. A total of 51 eligible patients were included, of whom 21 were in PCDT group (mean age, 60.1 ± 13.0years; 52.4% male) and 30 in anticoagulation alone group (mean age, 66.6 ± 11.1years; 50.0% male). No significant differences regarding age, sex, onset time, limb characteristics, cancer conditions or risk factors were detected (p > .05). After PCDT, grade III lysis was achieved in 8 and grade II lysis in 11 patients. Clinical success was achieved in 90.5% (19/21) patients. The symptoms of leg pain and swelling were significantly improved in both groups. Except for transient macroscopic hemoglobinuria occurring in PCDT group, none of all patients suffered from procedure-related and major complications. Minor complications such as bleeding events occurred in 23.8% (5/21) of patients in PCDT group compared with 10.0% (3/30) in anticoagulation alone group (p > .05). At the 6-month follow-up, iliofemoral patency was found an absolute risk reduction of 37.9% (70.0 vs. 32.1%) (95% CI: 1.183-4.008%; P = 0.010). The incidence of mild PTS was 5.0% (1/20) in PCDT group compared with 10.7% (3/28) in anticoagulation alone group (p > .05). The PCDT is a safe and effective modality in managing patients with CAT, leading to improved clinical outcomes with alowcomplication. The PCDT was more effective than anticoagulation alone in massive symptom relief and venous patency.