Pharmacokinetics Of Ondansetron Research Articles

Pharmacokinetic Modeling of the Effect of Tariquidar on Ondansetron Disposition into the Central Nervous System

PurposeSerotonin (5-HT3) receptor antagonists are promising agents for treatment of neuropathic pain. However, insufficient drug exposure at the central nervous system (CNS) might result in lack of efficacy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of administration of a Pgp inhibitor (tariquidar) on ondansetron exposure in the brain, spinal cord, and cerebrospinal fluid in a wild-type rat model.MethodsOndansetron (10 mg/kg) and tariquidar (7.5 mg/kg) were administered intravenously, plasma and tissue samples were collected and analyzed by HPLC. A mathematical model with brain, spinal cord, cerebrospinal fluid and two systemic disposition compartments was developed to describe the data.ResultsThe results demonstrate that tariquidar at 7.5 mg/kg resulted in a complete inhibition of Pgp efflux of ondansetron in the brain and spinal cord. The compartmental model successfully captured pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in wild type and Pgp knockout (KO) animals receiving the drug alone or in wild type animals receiving the ondansetron and tariquidar combination.ConclusionsThe study provided important quantitative information on enhancement of CNS exposure to ondansetron using co-administration of Pgp Inhibitor in a rat model, which will be further utilized in conducting a clinical study. Tariquidar co-administration resulted in ondansetron CNS exposure comparable to observed in Pgp KO rats. Results also highlighted the effect of tariquidar on plasma disposition of ondansetron, which may not be dependent on Pgp inhibition, and should be evaluated in future studies.

A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model to Predict Systemic Ondansetron Concentration in Liver Cirrhosis Patients.

Ondansetron is a drug that is routinely prescribed for the management of nausea and vomiting associated with cancer, radiation therapy, and surgical operations. It is mainly metabolized in the liver, and it might accumulate in patients with hepatic impairment and lead to unwanted adverse events. A physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was developed to predict the exposure of ondansetron in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. The population-based PBPK simulator PK-Sim was utilized for simulating ondansetron exposure in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. The developed model successfully described the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in healthy and liver cirrhosis populations. The predicted area under the curve, maximum systemic concentration, and clearance were within the allowed twofold range. The exposure of ondansetron in the population of Child-Pugh class C has doubled in comparison to Child-Pugh class A. The dose has to be adjusted for liver cirrhosis patients to ensure comparable exposure to a healthy population. In this study, the developed PBPK model has described the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron successfully. The PBPK model has been successfully evaluated to be used as a tool for dose adjustments in liver cirrhosis patients.

Optimizing a therapy for opiate use disorders: Characterizing ondansetron pharmacokinetics in blood and brain.

Administration of a widely used 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor (5HT3A R) antagonist (ondansetron) potently inhibited the development of experimentally induced opioid dependence and withdrawal responses in mice and humans. However, in several studies examining withdrawal symptoms in subjects with chronic opioid use disorders (OUDs), ondansetron exhibited reduced or absent efficacy. Because attenuation of opioid withdrawal symptomatology is mediated within the brain, this study examined single-dose ondansetron pharmacokinetics in the blood and brain of mice. We demonstrate that ondansetron concentrations in the brain (Cbrain ng/mg) are 1000-fold lower than the blood concentrations (Cblood ng/ml) and decrease rapidly after ondansetron administration; and that a large percentage of brain ondansetron remains in the ventricular fluid. These results indicate that the ondansetron dose, and the time window between ondansetron and opioid administration, and when withdrawal is assessed are critical considerations for clinical studies involving subjects with chronic OUD. The pharmacokinetic results and the dosing considerations discussed here can be used to improve the design of subsequent clinical trials, which will test whether a more prolonged period of ondansetron administration can provide a desperately needed therapy that can prevent the development of neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome in babies born to mothers with chronic OUD.

Development of a Generic Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Lactation and Prediction of Maternal and Infant Exposure to Ondansetron via Breast Milk.

Ondansetron is commonly used in breastfeeding mothers to treat nausea and vomiting. There is limited information in humans regarding safety of ondansetron exposure to nursing infants and no adequate study looking at ondansetron pharmacokinetics during lactation. We developed a generic physiologically-based pharmacokinetic lactation model for small molecule drugs and applied this model to predict ondansetron transfer into breast milk and characterize infant exposure. Drug-specific model inputs were parameterized using data from the literature. Population-specific inputs were derived from a previously conducted systematic literature review of anatomic and physiologic changes in postpartum women. Model predictions were evaluated using ondansetron plasma and breast milk concentration data collected prospectively from 78 women in the Commonly Used Drugs During Lactation and infant Exposure (CUDDLE) study. The final model predicted breast milk and plasma exposures following a single 4mg dose of intravenous ondansetron in 1,000 simulated women who were 2days postpartum. Model predictions showed good agreement with observed data. Breast milk median prediction error (MPE) was 18.4% and median absolute prediction error (MAPE) was 53.0%. Plasma MPE was 32.5% and MAPE was 43.2%. The model-predicted daily and relative infant doses were 0.005mg/kg/day and 3.0%, respectively. This model adequately predicted ondansetron passage into breast milk. The calculated low relative infant dose indicates that mothers receiving ondansetron can safely breastfeed. The model building blocks and population database are open-source and can be adapted to other drugs.

Pharmacokinetics of Organic Cation Transporter 1 (OCT1) Substrates in Oct1/2 Knockout Mice and Species Difference in Hepatic OCT1-Mediated Uptake.

Organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) plays a role in hepatic uptake of drugs, affecting in vivo exposure, distinguished primarily through pharmacogenetics of the SLC22A1 gene. The role of OCT1 in vivo has not been confirmed, however, via drug-drug interactions that similarly affect exposure. In the current research, we used Oct1/2 knockout mice to assess the role of Oct1 in hepatic clearance and liver partitioning of clinical substrates and assess the model for predicting an effect of OCT1 function on pharmacokinetics in humans. Four OCT1 substrates (sumatriptan, fenoterol, ondansetron, and tropisetron) were administered to wild-type and knockout mice, and plasma, tissue, and urine were collected. Tissue transporter expression was evaluated using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. In vitro, uptake of all compounds in human and mouse hepatocytes and human OCT1- and OCT2-expressing cells was evaluated. The largest effect of knockout was on hepatic clearance and liver partitioning of sumatriptan (2- to 5-fold change), followed by fenoterol, whereas minimal changes in the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and tropisetron were observed. This aligned with uptake in mouse hepatocytes, in which inhibition of uptake of sumatriptan and fenoterol into mouse hepatocytes by an OCT1 inhibitor was much greater compared with ondansetron and tropisetron. Conversely, inhibition of all four substrates was evident in human hepatocytes, in line with reported clinical pharmacogenetic data. These data confirm the role of Oct1 in the hepatic uptake of the four OCT1 substrates and elucidate species differences in OCT1-mediated hepatocyte uptake that should be considered when utilizing the model to predict effects in humans. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Studies in carriers of SLC22A1 null variants indicate a role of organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1) in the hepatic uptake of therapeutic agents, although OCT1-mediated drug-drug interactions have not been reported. This work used Oct1/2 knockout mice to confirm the role of Oct1 in the hepatic clearance and liver partitioning in mice for OCT1 substrates with reported pharmacogenetic effects. Species differences observed in mouse and human hepatocyte uptake clarify limitations of the knockout model for predicting exposure changes in humans for some OCT1 substrates.

Anti-nausea effects and pharmacokinetics of ondansetron, maropitant and metoclopramide in a low-dose cisplatin model of nausea and vomiting in the dog: a blinded crossover study

BackgroundNausea is a subjective sensation which is difficult to measure in non-verbal species. The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy of three classes of antiemetic drugs in a novel low dose cisplatin model of nausea and vomiting and measure change in potential nausea biomarkers arginine vasopressin (AVP) and cortisol. A four period cross-over blinded study was conducted in eight healthy beagle dogs of both genders. Dogs were administered 18 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously, followed 45 min later by a 15 min infusion of either placebo (saline) or antiemetic treatment with ondansetron (0.5 mg/kg; 5-HT3 antagonist), maropitant (1 mg/kg; NK1 antagonist) or metoclopramide (0.5 mg/kg; D2 antagonist). The number of vomits and nausea associated behaviours, scored on a visual analogue scale, were recorded every 15 min for 8 h following cisplatin administration. Plasma samples were collected to measure AVP, cortisol and antiemetic drug concentrations.ResultsThe placebo treated group vomited an average number of 7 times (range 2–13). None of the dogs in either the ondansetron or maropitant treated groups vomited during the observation period. The onset of nausea-like behaviour in the placebo-treated group occurred at t3.5h and peaked at t4.75h with nausea behaviour score of 58.5 ± 4.6 mm. Ondansetron and maropitant reduced overall the area under the curve of nausea behaviour score by 90% and 25%, respectively. Metoclopramide had no effect on either vomiting or nausea.Cisplatin-induced nausea and vomiting caused concomitant increases in AVP and cortisol. In the placebo-treated group, AVP and cortisol increased from t2.5h, peaked at t5h (11.3 ± 2.9 pmol L−1 and 334.0 ± 46.7 nmol/L, respectively) and returned to baseline by t8h. AVP and cortisol increases were completely prevented by ondansetron and only partially by maropitant, while metoclopramide had no effect. The terminal half-lives (harmonic mean ± pseudo SD) for ondansetron, maropitant and metoclopramide were 1.21 ± 0.51, 5.62 ± 0.77 and 0.87 ± 0.17 h respectively.Conclusions5-HT3 receptor antagonist ondansetron demonstrates the greatest anti-emetic and anti-nausea efficacy of the three drugs. AVP and cortisol appear to be selective biomarkers of nausea rather than emesis, providing a means of objectively measuring of nausea in the dog.

Effects of single or repeated Daehwangmokdanphee-tang administration, a polyherbal formula, on pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in rats

Effects of single or repeated Daehwangmokdanphee-tang administration, a polyherbal formula, on pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in rats

Pharmacokinetic modeling and Monte Carlo simulation of ondansetron following oral administration in dogs

Ondansetron is a potent antiemetic drug that has been commonly used to treat acute and chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in dogs. The aim of this study was to perform a pharmacokinetic analysis of ondansetron in dogs following oral administration of a single dose. A single 8-mg oral dose of ondansetron (Zofran(®) ) was administered to beagles (n=18), and the plasma concentrations of ondansetron were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The data were analyzed by modeling approaches using ADAPT5, and model discrimination was determined by the likelihood-ratio test. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax ) was 11.5±10.0ng/mL at 1.1±0.8h. The area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve from time zero to the last measurable concentration was 15.9±14.7ng·h/mL, and the half-life calculated from the terminal phase was 1.3±0.7h. The interindividual variability of the pharmacokinetic parameters was high (coefficient of variation>44.1%), and the one-compartment model described the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron well. The estimated plasma concentration range of the usual empirical dose from the Monte Carlo simulation was 0.1-13.2ng/mL. These findings will facilitate determination of the optimal dose regimen for dogs with CINV.

Oral, subcutaneous, and intravenous pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in healthy cats

Ondansetron is a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist that is an effective anti-emetic in cats. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in healthy cats. Six cats with normal complete blood count, serum biochemistry, and urinalysis received 2 mg oral (mean 0.43 mg/kg), subcutaneous (mean 0.4 mg/kg), and intravenous (mean 0.4 mg/kg) ondansetron in a cross-over manner with a 5-day wash out. Serum was collected prior to, and at 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 18, and 24 h after administration of ondansetron. Ondansetron concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. Noncompartmental pharmacokinetic modeling and dose interval modeling were performed. Repeated measures anova was used to compare parameters between administration routes. Bioavailability of ondansetron was 32% (oral) and 75% (subcutaneous). Calculated elimination half-life of ondansetron was 1.84 ± 0.58 h (intravenous), 1.18 ± 0.27 h (oral) and 3.17 ± 0.53 h (subcutaneous). The calculated elimination half-life of subcutaneous ondansetron was significantly longer (P < 0.05) than oral or intravenous administration. Subcutaneous administration of ondansetron to healthy cats is more bioavailable and results in a more prolonged exposure than oral administration. This information will aid management of emesis in feline patients.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of ondansetron. A review.

5-HT3 receptors are ubiquitous in the enteric, sympathetic, parasympathetic and sensory nervous systems and in the central nervous system (CNS) (Kilpatrick et al 1990). In man 5-HT3 receptors are mainly situated on enterochromaffin cells in the gastrointestinal mucosa, which are innervated by vagal afferents (Reynolds et al 1989), and the area postrema of the brain stem, which forms the chemoreceptor trigger zone. Ondansetron is a selective antagonist at 5-HT3 receptors. It is 100 times more potent than metoclopramide at this site (Tyers 1992). It shows limited binding to other receptors and has a wide therapeutic window. Ondansetron is a useful antiemetic which probably has both central and peripheral actions in patients undergoing radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy or general anaesthesia (Naylor & Rudd 1992). This paper reviews the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in health and disease to provide information for clinicians; it might alter prescribing and alert them to possible drug interactions.

Effects of cytochrome P450 (CYP) inducers and inhibitors on ondansetron pharmacokinetics in rats: involvement of hepatic CYP2D subfamily and 3A1/2 in ondansetron metabolism

The types of hepatic microsomal cytochrome P450 (CYP) isozymes responsible for the in-vivo metabolism of ondansetron in rats have not been reported. In this study, ondansetron at a dose of 8 mg kg(-1) was administered intravenously to rats pretreated with various inducers of CYP isozymes, such as 3-methylcholanthrene, orphenadrine citrate, isoniazid and dexamethasone phosphate (the main inducers of CYP1A1/2, 2B1/2, 2E1 and 3A1/2 in rats, respectively), and inhibitors, such as SKF-525A (a non-specific inhibitor of CYP isozymes), sulfaphenazole, quinine hydrochloride and troleandomycin (the main inhibitors of CYP2C6, 2D subfamily and 3A1/2 in rats, respectively). In rats pretreated with quinine hydrochloride and troleandomycin, the time-averaged non-renal clearance of ondansetron was significantly slower (48.9 and 13.2% decrease, respectively) than that in control rats. In rats pretreated with dexamethasone phosphate, the time-averaged non-renal clearance was significantly faster (18.2% increase) than that in control rats. The results suggest that ondansetron is primarily metabolized via the CYP2D subfamily and 3A1/2 in rats.

Population pharmacokinetics of intravenous ondansetron in oncology and surgical patients aged 1−48 months

Until recently, ondansetron was approved for the prevention of nausea and vomiting only in patients older than 2 years. However, as the use of ondansetron in patients younger than 2 years had been documented, characterization of ondansetron pharmacokinetics in this younger pediatric age group was warranted. The pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered ondansetron were evaluated in oncology and surgical patients aged 1-48 months. Pooled data from 124 patients, including 745 pharmacokinetic samples, were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effects modeling. Ondansetron pharmacokinetics were described by a two-compartment model. Body-size effects on ondansetron disposition were accounted for via standard allometric relationships, normalized to 10.4 kg. A maturation process with a half-life of approximately 4 months was incorporated to describe a decrease in clearance (CL) in infants. Clearance [95% confidence interval (CI)] for a typical patient was 1.53 (1.34-1.78) L/h/kg(0.75) with an interindividual variability of 56.8%. Ondansetron CL was reduced by 31%, 53%, and 76% for the typical 6-month-, 3-month-, and 1-month-old patient, respectively. Simulations showed that an ondansetron dose of 0.1 mg/kg in children younger than 6 months produced exposure similar to a 0.15-mg/kg dose in older children. The population pharmacokinetic analysis of ondansetron allows for characterization of individual patients based on body weight and age. It is recommended that patients younger than 4 months receiving ondansetron be closely monitored.

Dose‐independent pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in rats: contribution of hepatic and intestinal first‐pass effects to low bioavailability

The pharmacokinetic parameters of ondansetron were evaluated after its intravenous (at doses of 1, 4, 8 and 20 mg/kg) and oral (4, 8 and 20 mg/kg) administration to rats. The gastric, intestinal and hepatic first-pass effects of ondansetron were also evaluated after its intravenous, oral, intraportal, intragastric and intraduodenal administration at a dose of 8 mg/kg to rats. After intravenous and oral administration of ondansetron, the drug exhibits dose-independent pharmacokinetics in rats. After oral administration of ondansetron at a dose of 8 mg/kg, the unabsorbed fraction was 0.0158 of the dose, the extent of absolute oral bioavailability (F) value was 0.0407, and the hepatic and intestinal first-pass effects were 40.0% and 34.2% of the oral dose, respectively. The low F of ondansetron in rats was mainly due to considerable hepatic and intestinal first-pass effects. The lower F of ondansetron in rats (4.07%) than that in humans (62+/-15%) was mainly due to greater hepatic metabolism of the drug in rats. Ondansetron was stable in the rat gastric juices and various buffer solutions having pHs ranging from 1 to 13. The equilibrium plasma-to-blood cells partition ratio of ondansetron was 1.74-5.31. Protein binding of ondansetron to fresh rat plasma was 53.2%.

Gender differences in ondansetron pharmacokinetics in rats

It has been reported that ondansetron is primarily metabolized via hepatic CYP2D and 3A1/2 in male Sprague-Dawley rats, and CYP2D1 and 3A2 are male dominant and male specific isozymes, respectively, in rats. Thus, it could be expected that the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron would be changed in male rats compared with those in female rats. Thus, gender-different ondansetron pharmacokinetics were evaluated after its intravenous or oral administration at a dose of 8 mg/kg to male and female Sprague-Dawley rats. After intravenous administration of ondansetron to male rats, the AUC and time-averaged non-renal clearance (Clnr) of the drug were significantly smaller (22.6% decrease) and faster (27.3% increase), respectively, than those in female rats. This probably could be due to faster hepatic blood flow rate in male rats. After oral administration of ondansetron to male rats, the AUC of the drug was also significantly smaller (58.8% decrease) than that in female rats, and this could have been due mainly to increased intestinal metabolism of ondansetron in addition to increased hepatic metabolism of the drug in male rats.

Pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in very young pediatric patients

Background/Aims Ondansetron (OND) is indicated in patients as young as 2 yr of age for the prevention of nausea and vomiting. There is an unmet need for antiemetic therapy in very young oncology and surgical patients, and off-label use of OND in patients aged less than 2 yr has been documented; therefore, characterization of OND pharmacokinetics (PK) in this age group was warranted. Methods Intravenous OND PK was evaluated in oncology and surgical patients aged 1–48 mo, 727 samples from 115 patients were analyzed using nonlinear mixed-effect modeling. Results A 2-compartment model describing interindividual variability on clearance (CL) and volumes of distribution (V) adequately described the data. Covariate analysis suggested CL was positively correlated with weight, though negatively correlated with age. CL and half-life (95% CI) for a typical patient (10 kg, 20 mo) were 0.57 L/h/kg (0.50–0.66) and 4.9h (4.2–5.8), respectively, compared with ~0.5 L/h/kg and ~2.6 h in patients aged 3–7 yr. The modest extension of OND half-life observed is secondary to increased V/kg. Implementing a posterior-predictive check, the median observed AUC (a correlate of OND efficacy) was well captured by the model, which could therefore be used to select efficacious doses of OND. Conclusions Weight-normalized CL of OND in patients aged 1–48 mo was comparable to that observed in patients aged >3 yr, suggesting similar exposure and efficacy should be achieved in patients aged 1–48 mo by dosing OND at the same mg/kg doses. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2005) 77, P97–P97; doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2005.01.002

Effects of aprepitant on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and granisetron in healthy subjects

Background: The neurokinin-1-receptor antagonist aprepitant, when given in combination with a corticosteroid and a 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT 3)-receptor antagonist, has been shown to be effective for the prevention of acute and delated chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). Objective: Two studies were conducted to determine whether concomitant administration of aprepitant altered the pharmacokinetic profiles of ondansetron and granisetron, two 5-HT 3-receptor antagonists commonly used as antiemetic therapy for CINV. Methods: The 2 studies were randomized, open-label, crossover trials conducted in healthy subjects aged between 18 and 46 years. Study 1 involved the following 2 treatment regimens: aprepitant 375 mg PO, dexamethasone 20 mg PO, and ondansetron 32 mg IV on day 1, followed by aprepitant 250 mg PO and dexamethasone 8 mg PO on days 2 through 5; and dexamethasone 20 mg PO and ondansetron 32 mg IV on day 1, followed by dexamethasone 8 mg PO on days 2 through 5. Study 2 involved the following 2 treatment regimens: aprepitant 125 mg PO with granisetron 2 mg PO on day 1, followed by aprepitant 80 mg PO on days 2 and 3; and granisetron 2 mg PO on day 1 only. Individual plasma samples were used to estimate area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC 0−∞), peak plasma concentration, and apparent terminal elimination half-life ( t 1 2 ) of both ondansetron and granisetron. Results: Study 1 included 19 subjects (10 women, 9 men), and study 2 included 18 subjects (11 men, 7 women). Coadministration of aprepitant 375 mg produced a small but statistically significant increase in the AUC 0−∞ for intravenous ondansetron (from 1268.3 to 1456.5 ng·h/mL; P = 0.019), with no significant effect on peak concentration at the end of the infusion (360.8 ng/mL with aprepitant vs 408.4 ng/mL without) or t 1 2 (5.0 vs 4.5 hours, respectively). Coadministration of aprepitant 125 mg/80 mg did not alter the mean pharmacokinetic characteristics of oral granisetron (AUC 0−∞, 101.4 ng·h/mL with aprepitant vs 92.2 ng·h/mL without; maximum plasma concentration, 9.0 ng/mL with and without aprepitant; time to maximum plasma concentration, both 3.0 hours; t 1 2 , 6.5 vs 6.9 hours, respectively). Conclusion: Concomitant administration of aprepitant had no clinically significant effect on the mean pharmacokinetic characteristics of either ondansetron or granisetron in these healthy subjects.

Metabolite kinetics of ondansetron in rat. Comparison of hepatic microsomes, isolated hepatocytes and liver slices, with in vivo disposition

1. The kinetics of hydroxylation and N-demethylation of ondansetron have been determined in freshly isolated hepatocytes, hepatic microsomes and precision-cut liver slices from the male Sprague-Dawley rat. In vivo studies have also been carried out to characterize the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron and in vitro data have been assessed for their value as predictors of hepatic clearance. 2. In the three in vitro systems, the formation of hydroxylated and demethylated metabolites were characterized as a function of substrate concentration by a high-affinity, low-capacity site and a low-affinity, high-capacity site which was not saturated over the concentration range studied (2.5-500 microM). Slices gave consistently higher Km's (20 and 30 microM for hydroxylation and demethylation respectively) than hepatocytes (3 and 13 microM respectively) and microsomes (2 and 5 microM respectively.) The rank order of Vmax and CL(int) was the same for each system; hydroxylation rates exceeding demethylation rates. Although two hydroxylations (7- and 8-hydroxy metabolites) occurred exclusively in microsomes, these are believed to originate from a common precursor. 3. The high CL(int) of ondansetron (150 ml/min/SRW, where SRW is a standard rat weight of 250g) is well predicted by scaling either microsomal clearance for microsomal protein recovery or hepatocyte clearance for hepatocellularity (212 and 135 ml/min/SRW respectively). In contrast, the use of liver slice data scaled to a whole liver substantially underestimates CL(int) (9 ml/min/SRW).

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous ondansetron in healthy children undergoing ear, nose, and throat surgery*

To determine the pharmacokinetics of the 5-HT3 antagonist ondansetron in children, informed written consent was obtained from the parents of 21 healthy children aged from 3 to 12 years scheduled for ear, nose, and throat surgery. The children were stratified according to age: 3 to 7 years and 7.1 to 12 years, and a single intravenous infusion of 2 or 4 mg ondansetron, respectively, was administered over 5 minutes before induction of anesthesia. After completion of the infusion, anesthesia was induced intravenously and maintained with inhalational anesthesia. Whole blood (3 ml) was obtained before administration of ondansetron, at completion of the infusion, at the beginning and end of surgery, and at 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after start of the infusion. Pharmacokinetic variables were determined with use of standard noncompartmental techniques. Mean plasma clearance was 0.50 L.hr-1.kg-1 and 0.39 L.hr-1.kg-1, the mean volume of distribution at steady-state was 1.70 L.kg-1 and 1.61 L.kg-1, and the mean plasma terminal half-life was 2.6 hours and 3.1 hours for the 2 mg and 4 mg groups, respectively. On a body surface area basis, mean plasma clearance was 14.0 and 13.7 L.hr-1.m-2 and mean volume of distribution was 47.7 and 55.9 L.m-2 for the 2 and 4 mg groups, respectively. There were no serious adverse events attributable to ondansetron. These data indicate that the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron in children from 3 to 12 years old are predictable and similar to those in adults. The elimination half-life of ondansetron increases in parallel with age. However, clearance is constant when normalized to body surface area, but the volume of distribution increases over the age range studied.

Ondansetron clinical pharmacokinetics.

Ondansetron is a potent and highly selective serotonin 5-HT3-receptor antagonist which has demonstrated important antiemetic activity and good tolerability in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Ondansetron is completely and rapidly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract after oral administration, and does not accumulate with repeated oral administration. Owing to hepatic first-pass metabolism, its bioavailability is only about 60% compared with ondansetron administered by infusion over 15 minutes. Bioavailability is slightly increased when administered after a standard meal, and is not influenced by coadministration of antacids; a slightly enhanced bioavailability has been observed in patients with cancer. Since the time to reach peak concentration is 0.5 to 2 hours after oral ingestion, the drug should be administered at least 30 minutes before chemotherapy. Possible alternative ways of administration of ondansetron include intramuscular, subcutaneous and rectal administration, and oral controlled-release formulations. Ondansetron is widely distributed (volume of distribution approximately 160L) and binds moderately (70 to 76%) to plasma proteins; the elimination half-life averages approximately 3.8 +/- 1 hours. Clearance occurs by hepatic metabolism (95%) rather than renal excretion. Metabolites do not play a role in the activity of the drug, and there is no evidence of genetic polymorphic metabolism. Although aging is associated with decreased clearance and increased bioavailability, dosage adjustments are not required for the elderly, and may be necessary only in patients with severe hepatic impairment. Chemotherapeutic agents do not seem to modify the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron. There remains the question of whether control of emesis is related to systemic availability of ondansetron and, in consequence, the optimal dose and schedule of ondansetron is still to be identified with certainty.

Oral Ondansetron Pharmacokinetics: The Effect of Chemotherapy

The effect of a typical 5-day chemotherapy treatment with cisplatin (20-40 mg/m2 per day) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU, 1 gm/m2 per day) on the pharmacokinetics of ondansetron was investigated. Twenty cancer patients received 8 mg of ondansetron in three periods, including an oral tablet on day 1, an intravenous infusion on day 4, and an oral tablet on day 5. Absolute bioavailability after the oral dosing on day 1 was 87.5 +/- 31.3%, and on day 5 was 85.2 +/- 22.1% (P > .05). Mean values of AUC, Cmax, Tmax, and half life on days 1 and 5 were 399 +/- 275 and 381 +/- 222 ng.hour/mL, 53.3 +/- 26.8 and 43.6 +/- 21.7 ng/mL, 1.9 +/- 1.4 and 2 +/- 1.4 hours, and 5.21 +/- 1.78 and 6.19 +/- 1.99 hours, respectively. These values were not significantly different (P > .05). In summary, this study showed that cisplatin and 5-FU did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics of oral ondansetron in cancer patients during the 5 days of chemotherapy. Oral bioavailability of ondansetron appeared to be greater in cancer patients than in healthy subjects.