Pharmacokinetics Of Buprenorphine Research Articles

A Pharmacologic Evaluation of Buprenorphine in Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period.

The dosing regimen in the package insert for sublingual buprenorphine is similar for pregnant and nonpregnant people despite the physiologic changes seen during pregnancy. To compare plasma buprenorphine pharmacokinetics during and after pregnancy and relate buprenorphine concentration to the pharmacodynamic endpoints of pupil diameter, Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS), and craving scores. Prospective cohort of 22 pregnant people undergoing 33 pharmacologic studies (6-8 hours each) during pregnancy or postpartum. Participants were on a stable daily dose of 2-8 mg sublingual buprenorphine every 6 or 8 hours. The dosing frequency was selected by the participant. On study day, baseline measurements of plasma buprenorphine, pupil diameter, COWS, and craving scores were obtained, then the usual morning dose was taken, and measurements were repeated several times over 1 dosing interval. The dose-normalized area under the plasma buprenorphine concentration time curve was significantly (P = 0.036) lower during pregnancy (155 ± 52 ng × min/mL) than postpartum (218 ± 113 ng × min/mL). Buprenorphine trough concentrations were similar at the start (1.1 ± 0.7 ng/mL) and end of a dosing cycle (1.2 ± 0.8 ng/mL) regardless of dosing frequency. Pupillary diameter, COWS, and craving scores returned to baseline as buprenorphine concentrations approached ~1 ng/mL. Pregnant people require a higher dose of buprenorphine to achieve concentrations comparable to nonpregnant people. There is a temporal relationship between the plasma buprenorphine concentration and the pharmacodynamic markers of pupillary diameter, COWS, and craving scores. An average plasma concentration of ~1 ng/mL was associated with the lowest level of COWS and craving scores.

Pharmacokinetics of Extended-release Buprenorphine and Clinical Efficacy for Postoperative Pain Management in the Domestic Ferret (Mustela putorius furo).

Buprenorphine hydrochloride (Bup-HCl) is a common injectable opioid analgesic. In ferrets, Bup-HCl must be administered every 8 to 12 h to maintain clinical efficacy. Extended-release analgesics offer multiple advantages, including reduced handling and injection frequency, improved compliance, and increased protection from end-of-dose failure. Although efficacy of extended-release buprenorphine formulations has been demonstrated in other species, their use in the domestic ferret has not been investigated. In this study, we evaluated the pharmacokinetics of a compounded polymeric formulation of buprenorphine (Bup-ER) and a pharmaceutical-grade, FDA-indexed liposomal suspension (Bup-XR). Two doses each of Bup-ER (0.12 and 0.2 mg/kg) and Bup-XR (0.2 and 0.6 mg/kg SC) were administered to young adult female ferrets and plasma concentrations were measured between 0 and 96 h (n = 4 animals per timepoint). All doses of both drugs achieved therapeutic plasma levels by 30 min. Furthermore, high-dose Bup-XR maintained therapeutic levels for 72 h, followed by high-dose Bup-ER (less than 48 h), low-dose Bup-XR (24 h), and low-dose Bup-ER (less than 24 h). In this study, we also developed a pain scoring system and utilized this to compare analgesic efficacy between single high-dose Bup-XR (0.6 mg/kg SC) and a standard postoperative course of Bup-HCl (0.02 mg/kg SC every 10 to 12 h for 8 doses) after ovariohysterectomy. Ferrets receiving Bup-XR had significantly lower respiratory rate and posture scores in the first 24 h postoperatively than did those that received Bup-HCl and were less likely to react to palpation of the surgical incision. Of note, ferrets that received high-dose Bup-ER had a significantly higher incidence of injection site reactions than ferrets that received Bup-HCl (P = 0.0137). This study demonstrates that a single dose of Bup-XR (0.6 mg/kg SC) is a safe and effective analgesic in female ferrets, with a duration of action up to 72 h and minimal side effects, offering a refinement to analgesia in this species.

Development and Verification of a Full Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Sublingual Buprenorphine in Healthy Adult Volunteers that Accounts for Nonlinear Bioavailability.

Sublingual buprenorphine is used for opioid use disorder and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome. The study aimed to develop a full physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model that can adequately describe dose- and formulation-dependent bioavailability of buprenorphine. Simcyp (v21.0) was used for model construction. Four linear regression models (i.e., untransformed or log transformed for dose or proportion sublingually absorbed) were explored to describe sublingual absorption of buprenorphine across dose. Published clinical trial data not used in model development were used for verification. The PBPK model's predictive performance was deemed adequate if the geometric means of ratios between predicted and observed (P/O) area under the curve (AUC), peak concentration (Cmax), and time to reach Cmax (Tmax) fell within the 1.25-fold prediction error range. Sublingual buprenorphine absorption was best described by a regression model with logarithmically transformed dose. By integrating this nonlinear absorption profile, the PBPK model adequately predicted buprenorphine pharmacokinetics (PK) following administration of sublingual tablets and solution across a dose range of 2-32 mg, with geometric mean (95% confidence interval) P/O ratios for AUC and Cmax equaling 0.99 (0.86-1.12) and 1.24 (1.09-1.40), respectively, and median (5th to 95th percentile) for Tmax equaling 1.11 (0.69-1.57). A verified PBPK model was developed that adequately predicts dose- and formulation-dependent buprenorphine PK following sublingual administration. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model developed in this study is the first to adequately predict dose- and formulation-dependent sublingual buprenorphine pharmacokinetics. Accurate prediction was facilitated by the incorporation of a novel nonlinear absorption model. The developed model will serve as the foundation for maternal-fetal PBPK modeling to predict maternal and fetal buprenorphine exposures to optimize buprenorphine treatment for neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.

Pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and its metabolite norbuprenorphine in neutered male cats anesthetized with isoflurane

ObjectiveTo characterize the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in isoflurane-anesthetized cats. Study designProspective experimental study. AnimalsA group of six healthy adult male neutered cats. MethodsCats were anesthetized with isoflurane in oxygen. Catheters were placed in a jugular vein for blood sampling and in a medial saphenous vein for buprenorphine and lactated Ringer’s solution administration. Buprenorphine hydrochloride (40 μg kg–1 over 5 minutes) was administered intravenously. Blood samples were collected before buprenorphine administration and at various times up to 12 hours after administration. Plasma buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations were measured using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Compartment models were fitted to the time-concentration data using nonlinear mixed effect (population) modeling. ResultsA five-compartment model (three compartments for buprenorphine and two compartments for norbuprenorphine) best fitted the data. Typical value (% interindividual variability) for the three buprenorphine volumes of distribution, and the metabolic clearance to norbuprenorphine, the remaining metabolic clearance and the two distribution clearances were 157 (33), 759 (34) and 1432 (43) mL kg–1, and 5.3 (33), 16.4 (11), 58.7 (27) and 6.0 (not estimated) mL minute–1 kg–1, respectively. Typical values (% interindividual variability) for the two norbuprenorphine volumes of distribution, and the norbuprenorphine metabolic and distribution clearances were 1437 (30) and 8428 (not estimated) mL kg–1 and 48.4 (68) and 235.9 (not estimated) mL minute–1 kg–1, respectively. Conclusions and clinical relevanceThe pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in isoflurane-anesthetized cats were characterized by a medium clearance.

Pharmacokinetics of intra-articular buprenorphine in horses with lipopolysaccharide-induced synovitis.

The objective of this study was to describe the pharmacokinetics of intra-articular (IA) administered buprenorphine in horses with lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced synovitis. Radiocarpal synovitis was induced in six healthy adult horses with the IA injection of LPS (0.5ng/joint) on two occasions in a randomized cross-over design. Treatments (IA buprenorphine (IAB) at 5μg/kg plus intravenous saline; and intravenous buprenorphine (IVB) at 5μg/kg plus IA saline) were administered 4h following LPS injection. Concentrations of buprenorphine were assessed in plasma and synovial fluid (SF) at 0.5, 2, 6, 12, and 24 h after administration. Pharmacokinetic parameters after IVB and IAB in plasma and synovial fluid were calculated using a nonlinear mixed effects model. IAB was detectable in SF of all horses at 24 h [median concentration of 6.2 (3.46-22.6) ng/mL]. IAB resulted in a median plasma concentration of 0.59 (0.42-1.68) ng/mL at 0.5h and was detectable in all subjects for up to 6 h and in two horses for up to 12 h. IVB resulted in SF concentrations detected up to 6 h in all horses [median concentration of 0.12 (0.07-0.82) ng/mL]. Results suggest that IA buprenorphine remains present in the inflamed joint for at least 24 h and systemic absorption occurs.

Population pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine and naloxone sublingual combination in Chinese healthy volunteers and patients with opioid use disorder: Model-based dose optimization.

The sublingual combination of buprenorphine (BUP) and naloxone (NLX) is a new treatment option for opioid use disorder (OUD) and is effective in preventing drug abuse. This study aimed to explore rational dosing regimen for OUD patients in China via a model-based dose optimization approach. BUP, norbuprenorphine (norBUP), and NLX plasma concentrations of 34 healthy volunteers and 12 OUD subjects after single or repeated dosing were included. A parent-metabolite population pharmacokinetics (popPK) model with transit compartments for absorption was implemented to describe the pharmacokinetic profile of BUP-norBUP. In addition, NLX concentrations were well captured by a one-compartment popPK model. Covariate analysis showed that every additional swallow after the administration within the observed range (0-12) resulted in a 3.5% reduction in BUP bioavailability. This provides a possible reason for the less-than-dose proportionality of BUP. There were no differences in the pharmacokinetic characteristics between BUP or NLX in healthy volunteers and OUD subjects. Ethnic sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the dose-normalized peak concentration and area-under-the-curve of BUP in Chinese were about half of Puerto Ricans, which was consistent with a higher clearance observed in Chinese (166 vs. 270 ). Furthermore, Monte Carlo simulations showed that an 8mg three-times daily dose was the optimized regimen for Chinese OUD subjects. This regimen ensured that opioid receptor occupancy remained at a maximum (70%) in more than 95% of subjects, at the same time, with NLX plasma concentrations below the withdrawal reaction threshold (4.6 ).

Findings from a pilot study of buprenorphine population pharmacokinetics: A potential effect of HIV on buprenorphine bioavailability

BackgroundBuprenorphine is widely used in the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD). There are few pharmacokinetic models of buprenorphine across diverse populations. Population pharmacokinetics (POPPK) allows for covariates to be included in pharmacokinetic studies, thereby opening the potential to evaluate the effect of comorbidities, medications, and other factors on buprenorphine pharmacokinetics. This pilot study used POPPK to explore buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in patients with and without HIV receiving buprenorphine for OUD. MethodsPlasma buprenorphine levels were measured in 54 patients receiving buprenorphine for OUD just prior to and 2–5 h following regular buprenorphine dosing. A linear one-compartment POPPK model with first-order estimation was used to evaluate buprenorphine clearance (CL/F) and volume of distribution (V/F). Covariates included weight and HIV status. ResultsAll HIV+ patients reported complete past-month adherence to taking antiretroviral therapy that included either efavirenz or nevirapine. Buprenorphine CL/F was 76% higher in HIV+ patients (n = 17) than HIV- patients (n = 37). Buprenorphine V/F was 41% higher in the HIV+ patients. ConclusionsPOPPK can be used to model buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in a real-world clinical population. While interactions between ART and buprenorphine alter buprenorphine CL/F, we also found alteration in V/F. Proportionate changes in CL/F and V/F might indicate a primary effect on bioavailability (F) rather than two separate effects. These findings indicate reduced buprenorphine bioavailability in patients with HIV.

Pharmacokinetics of Sustained-release and Extended-release Buprenorphine in Mice after Surgical Catheterization.

The Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals strongly encourages the use of pharmaceutical-grade chemicals and analgesics. Sustained-release buprenorphine (SRB) is administered extralabel to rodents to mitigate moderate to severe pain. An FDA-indexed buprenorphine formulation-extended-release buprenorphine (XRB)-has recently become available and is currently the only pharmaceutical-grade slow-release buprenorphine formulation approved for use in mice and rats. However, no studies have directly compared the pharmacokinetic parameters of SRB and XRB in surgically catheterized mice. To this end, we compared the plasma buprenorphine concentrations and pharmacokinetic parameters of SRB and XRB in mice after surgical catheterization. We hypothesized that mice treated before surgery with SRB or XRB would have circulating buprenorphine concentrations that exceeded the therapeutic threshold for as long as 72 h after surgery. Male and female C57Bl/6J mice were anesthetized, treated with a single dose of either SRB (1 mg/kg SC) or XRB (3.25 mg/kg SC), and underwent surgical catheterization. Arterial blood samples were collected at 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after administration. Weight loss after surgery (mean ± SEM) was similar between groups (SRB: males, 12% ± 2%; females, 8% ± 2%; XRB: males, 12% ± 1%; females, 8% ± 1%). Both SRB and XRB maintained circulating buprenorphine concentrations above the therapeutic level of 1.0 ng/mL for 72 h after administration. Plasma buprenorphine concentrations at 6, 24, and 48 h were significantly greater (3- to 4-fold) with XRB than SRB, commensurate with XRB's higher dose. These results support the use of either SRB or XRB for the alleviation of postoperative pain in mice. The availability of FDA-indexed XRB increases options for safe and effective pharmaceutical-grade analgesia in rodents.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous, oral transmucosal, and intranasal buprenorphine in healthy male dogs.

Effective management of pain in animals is of critical importance but options are limited for treating acute pain in dogs on an outpatient basis. The objective of this study was to compare the plasma concentrations and pharmacokinetics of a concentrated solution of buprenorphine, 1.8 mg/ml (Simbadol™) administered intravenously, intranasally, and via the oral transmucosal (OTM) route in healthy male dogs. Five healthy castrated adult male Beagle‐cross dogs were included in this randomized blocked crossover study. The dogs received 0.03 mg/kg body weight buprenorphine intravenously, intranasally, or via the OTM route, with a minimum 72‐h washout period between treatments. Blood samples were collected at multiple intervals up to 24 h post administration and buprenorphine plasma concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Non‐compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis revealed that the area under the curve of intravenous, intranasal, and OTM routes were 28.0 (15.1–41.3) h × ng/ml, 16.1 (3.4–28.7) h × ng/ml and 10.8 (8.8–11.8) h × ng/ml, respectively. The bioavailability of intranasal and OTM routes were 57.5 (22.7–93.7)% and 41.1 (25.5–69.4)%, respectively. Intranasal and OTM routes of administration of concentrated buprenorphine in dogs may allow for the provision of analgesic care at home.

Management of Psychiatric Disorders in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases.

Management of Psychiatric Disorders in Patients with Chronic Kidney Diseases.

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Investigate the Effect of Maturation on Buprenorphine Pharmacokinetics in Newborns with Neonatal Opioid Withdrawal Syndrome.

Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) is a major public health concern whose incidence has paralleled the opioid epidemic in the United States. Sublingual buprenorphine is an emerging treatment for NOWS, but given concerns about long-term adverse effects of perinatal opioid exposure, precision dosing of buprenorphine is needed. Buprenorphine pharmacokinetics (PK) in newborns, however, is highly variable. To evaluate underlying sources of PK variability, a neonatal physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of sublingual buprenorphine was developed using Simcyp (version 19.1). The PBPK model included metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, CYP2C8, UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1, UGT1A3, UGT2B7, and UGT2B17, with additional biliary excretion. Maturation of metabolizing enzymes was incorporated, and default CYP2C8 and UGT2B7 ontogeny profiles were updated according to recent literature. A biliary clearance developmental profile was outlined using clinical data from neonates receiving sublingual buprenorphine as NOWS treatment. Extensive PBPK model validation in adults demonstrated good predictability, with geometric mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) predicted/observed ratios (P/O ratios) of area under the curve from zero to infinity (AUC0-∞ ), peak concentration (Cmax ), and time to reach peak concentration (Tmax ) equaling 1.00 (0.74-1.33), 1.04 (0.84-1.29), and 0.95 (0.72-1.26), respectively. In neonates, the geometric mean (95% CI) P/O ratio of whole blood concentrations was 0.75 (95% CI 0.64-0.87). PBPK modeling and simulation demonstrated that variability in biliary clearance, sublingual absorption, and CYP3A4 abundance are likely important drivers of buprenorphine PK variability in neonates. The PBPK model could be used to guide development of improved buprenorphine starting dose regimens for the treatment of NOWS.

Buprenorphine blood concentrations: A biomarker for analgesia.

Opioids, the frontline drugs for postsurgical analgesia, have been linked to diversion and abuse with lethal consequences. The search for safe analgesics with less harm potential has been decades long. However, clinical trials for safe opioid and nonopioid analgesics have relied on subjective pain reports, which are biased by placebo effects that increase the complexity of trials to develop new therapies to manage pain. Research in opioid naïve animals and humans demonstrates that blood concentrations of opioids that effectively saturate the morphine opioid receptor are tightly linked with patient reports and quantitative sensory tests for analgesia. Opioid drug concentrations can predict clinical responses. This report reviews preclinical and clinical evidence correlating buprenorphine pharmacokinetics with analgesia. More than 30 years of data confirm buprenorphine blood concentrations can be an objective biomarker of analgesia for moderate to severe acute postoperative pain.

MATERNAL AND FETAL BUPRENORPHINE PHARMACOKINETICS IN PREGNANT SHEEP DURING TRANSDERMAL PATCH DOSING: Buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in pregnant sheep

BackgroundBuprenorphine is used in the opioid maintenance treatment for opioid dependent patients, including pregnant women. Despite the wide use, limited data exists on buprenorphine pharmacokinetics and fetal exposure during pregnancy. The aim of our study was to determine the buprenorphine pharmacokinetics during transdermal patch dosing to pregnant sheep and, to determine the extent of transplacental transfer of buprenorphine to the fetus. MethodsPregnant sheep in late gestation (n=50) received 20, 25 or 40 µg/h of buprenorphine as a 7-day extended-release transdermal patch. Plasma samples were collected from the ewe and the fetus on days 1 – 6, and buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations were determined. During the exposure period the sheep had a surgical procedure on the second day, a recovery phase, and an experimental procedure on the sixth day. In the experiment, hypoxia was induced under anesthesia for 18 sheep to investigate if decreased fetal pH would cause ion-trapping of buprenorphine in the fetus. The fetal/maternal plasma concentration ratio was determined on the second and on the sixth exposure day at baseline and during hypoxia. Maternal pharmacokinetics were modelled with a population pharmacokinetic method using the data from this study and our previous intravenous administration study. ResultsThe transdermal patch provided an extended release of buprenorphine throughout the exposure period, but the release rate declined approximately 20 h after patch placement. The median fetal/maternal plasma concentration ratio was 13 – 27 % throughout the exposure period at baseline. A ratio over 100 % was observed for four sheep on the sixth exposure day (102 – 269 %). A minor increase was seen in the median fetal/maternal-ratios during maternal hypoxia. Norbuprenorphine was undetected in all plasma samples. ConclusionsThe low transplacental passage of less than one fourth of the ewe's exposure supports buprenorphine as an alternative to methadone in opioid maintenance therapy during pregnancy.

Pharmacokinetics of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine (Simbadol) in male dogs

ObjectiveTo describe the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in dogs following administration of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine. Study designProspective, randomized, crossover study. AnimalsA total of six healthy male intact Beagle dogs, aged 9–13 months and weighing 10.3 ± 1.4 kg (mean ± standard deviation). MethodsDogs were randomized to be administered buprenorphine (0.12 mg kg–1; Simbadol, 1.8 mg mL–1) via the intravenous (lateral saphenous) or subcutaneous (dorsal interscapular) route followed by the alternative route of administration after a 14 day interval. Blood was sampled before administration and at set times up to 72 hours after injection. Plasma buprenorphine concentration was measured using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. ResultsA three-compartment model with zero or biphasic rapid and slow first-order input in (intravenous or subcutaneous data, respectively) and first-order elimination from the central compartment best fitted the data. The rapid first-order input accounted for 63% of the dosage absorption. Typical values (% interindividual variability) for the three compartment volumes were 900 (33), 2425 (not estimated) and 6360 (28) mL kg–1. The metabolic and two distribution clearances were 25.7 (21), 107.5 (74) and 5.7 (61) mL minute–1 kg–1. The absorption half-life for the fast absorption phase was 8.9 minutes with a 0.7 (103) minute delay. The absorption half-life for the slow absorption phase was 347 minutes with a 226 (42) minute delay. Median (range) bioavailability calculated from noncompartmental analysis was 143 (80–239)%. Calculated terminal half-life was 963 minutes. Conclusions and clinical relevanceThe high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine administered subcutaneously had a large volume of distribution and a rapid absorption phase followed by slower, delayed absorption. The high estimate of bioavailability should be interpreted with caution as values above 100% are most commonly related to experimental issues.

Pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in pregnant sheep after intravenous injection.

Buprenorphine is a semi‐synthetic opioid, widely used in the maintenance treatment for opioid‐dependent pregnant women. Limited data exist on the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in pregnancy. We conducted a pharmacokinetic study to determine the pharmacokinetics of intravenous buprenorphine in pregnant sheep. Fourteen pregnant sheep in late gestation received 10 µg/kg of buprenorphine as an intravenous bolus injection. Plasma samples were collected up to 48 h after administration. Buprenorphine and its metabolite, norbuprenorphine, were quantified from plasma using a LC/MS/MS method, with lower limits of quantification of 0.01 µg/L and 0.04 µg/L for buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine, respectively. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using noncompartmental analysis. The pharmacokinetic parameters, median (minimum−maximum), were Cmax 4.31 µg/L (1.93–15.5), AUC inf 2.89 h*µg/L (1.72–40.2), CL 3.39 L/h/kg (0.25–6.02), terminal t½ 1.75 h (1.07–31.0), Vss 8.04 L/kg (1.05–49.3). Norbuprenorphine was undetected in all plasma samples. The median clearance in pregnant sheep was higher than previously reported for nonpregnant sheep and human (male) subjects. Our sensitive analytical method was able to detect long terminal half‐lives for six subjects, and a wide between‐subject variability in the study population.Significance statement: Buprenorphine is widely used for the treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnancy. However, limited data exist on the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine during pregnancy. As this type of study cannot be done in humans due to ethical reasons, we conducted a study in pregnant sheep. This study provides pharmacokinetic data on buprenorphine in pregnant sheep and helps us to understand the pharmacokinetics of the drug in humans.

Pharmacokinetic Characterization and External Evaluation of a Quantitative Framework of Sublingual Buprenorphine in Patients with an Opioid Disorder in Puerto Rico.

Background: The aim of this analysis was to characterize the pharmacokinetics (PK) of sublingual buprenorphine (BUP) and its metabolites (buprenorphine glucuronide; BUP-g, norbuprenorphine; Nor-BUP, and norbuprenorphine glucuronide; Nor-BUP-g) in opioid use disorder (OUD) patients in Puerto Rico (PR) as a first step of evidence-based BUP dosing strategies in this population. Methods: BUP and metabolites concentrations were measured from 0 to 8 h after the administration of sublingual buprenorphine/naloxone films in 12 stable OUD subjects. Results: PK non-compartmental characteristics showed considerable variability in parameters between the subjects over the 8-h sampling time (tmax = 1.5 ± 0.7 h, Co = 1.6 ± 1.4 ng/mL, Cmax= 7.1 ± 6 ng/mL, and AUC0–8h = 26.8 ± 17.8 h·ng/mL). Subjects had a significantly higher tendency towards CYP-mediated N-demethylation, with the AUC0–8h ratios of the molar concentrations of [Nor-BUP + Nor-BUP-g] to BUP being (3.4 ± 1.9) significantly higher compared with BUP-g to BUP (0.19 ± 0.2). A two-compartment population-PK model with linear absorption (ka = 2.54 h−1), distribution (k12= 2.34 h−1, k14 = 1.29 h−1), metabolism (k24 = 1.28 × 10−1 h−1, k23 = 6.43 × 10−2 h−1, k35 = 1.23 × 10−1 h−1, k45 = 8.73 × 10−1 h−1), and elimination (k30 = 3.81 × 10−3 h−1, k50 = 1.27 × 10−1 h−1) adequately described the time-course of BUP and its metabolites, which has been externally validated using published data. Conclusions: Although limited in sampling time and number of recruited subjects, this study presents specific BUP PK characteristics that evidenced the need for additional PK studies and subsequent modeling of the data for the development of evidence-based dosing approaches in Puerto Rico.

Pharmacokinetics of a high concentration formulation of buprenorphine (Simbadol) in male dogs

Abstract Objective To describe the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in dogs following administration of a high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine. Study design Prospective, randomized, crossover study. Animals A total of six healthy male intact Beagle dogs, 9–13 months of age and weighing 10.3 ± 1.4 kg (mean ± standard deviation). Methods Dogs were randomized to be administered buprenorphine (0.12 mg kg−1; Simbadol, 1.8 mg mL−1) via the intravenous (lateral saphenous) or subcutaneous (dorsal interscapular) route followed by the alternative route of administration after a 14 day interval. Blood was sampled before administration and at set times up to 72 hours after injection. Plasma buprenorphine concentration was measured using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Results A 3-compartment model with zero or biphasic rapid and slow first order input in (intravenous or subcutaneous data, respectively) and first-order elimination from the central compartment best fitted the data. The rapid first order input accounted for 63% of the dosage absorption. Typical values (% interindividual variability) for the three compartment volumes were 900 (33), 2425 (not estimated) and 6360 (28) mL kg−1. The metabolic and two distribution clearances were 25.7 (21), 107.5 (74) and 5.7 (61) mL minute−1 kg−1. The absorption half-life for the fast absorption phase was 8.9 minutes with a 0.7 (103) minute delay. The absorption half-life for the slow absorption phase was 347 minutes with a 226 (42) minutes delay. Median (range) bioavailability calculated from noncompartmental analysis was 143 (80–239) %. Calculated terminal half-life was 963 minutes. Conclusions and clinical relevance The high-concentration formulation of buprenorphine administered subcutaneously had a large volume of distribution and a rapid absorption phase followed by slower, delayed absorption. The high estimate of bioavailability should be interpreted with caution as values above 100% are most commonly related to experimental issues.

The μ-opioid receptor gene polymorphism 118A>G weakens the pharmacological action of buprenorphine.

Opioids are commonly used analgesics for moderate to severe pain, but levels of drug effect vary among individuals. As for the mechanisms underlying these individual differences, there have been reports suggesting effects of polymorphisms in the gene encoding μ-opioid receptor (OPRM1). However, whether these polymorphisms affect the actions of μ-opioid receptor partial agonists has yet to be determined. This study aimed to assess differences in the pharmacological actions of buprenorphine, a μ-opioid receptor partial agonist, due to a polymorphism (A118G, rs1799971) in the OPRM1 gene in humans. Ten healthy adult men (5 with OPRM1 c.118AA and 5 with OPRM1 c.118GG) received a single intravenous dose of buprenorphine hydrochloride at 0.001 mg/kg. Blood samples were collected up to 360 minutes after drug administration to assess the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine. Nociceptive thresholds (temperature), digital symbol substitution test (DSST), and visual analog self-rating scale (VAS) for subjective symptoms were also evaluated over time to assess the pharmacodynamics. Nociceptive thresholds were significantly increased in the AA as compared to the GG group after buprenorphine administration (p = 0.025), while the DSST scores were significantly lower in the AA group (p < 0.001). The VAS scores for drowsiness (p < 0.001), malaise (p < 0.001), nausea (p < 0.001), and euphoria (p = 0.004) were higher in the AA than in the GG group. Levels of pharmacological actions of a μ-opioid receptor partial agonist vary in accordance with a polymorphism in the OPRM1 gene (A118G).

Physiologically-Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling of Buprenorphine in Adults, Children and Preterm Neonates.

Buprenorphine plays a crucial role in the therapeutic management of pain in adults, adolescents and pediatric subpopulations. However, only few pharmacokinetic studies of buprenorphine in children, particularly neonates, are available as conducting clinical trials in this population is especially challenging. Physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) modeling allows the prediction of drug exposure in pediatrics based on age-related physiological differences. The aim of this study was to predict the pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine in pediatrics with PBPK modeling. Moreover, the drug-drug interaction (DDI) potential of buprenorphine with CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein perpetrator drugs should be elucidated. A PBPK model of buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine in adults has been developed and scaled to children and preterm neonates, accounting for age-related changes. One-hundred-percent of the predicted AUClast values in adults (geometric mean fold error (GMFE): 1.22), 90% of individual AUClast predictions in children (GMFE: 1.54) and 75% in preterm neonates (GMFE: 1.57) met the 2-fold acceptance criterion. Moreover, the adult model was used to simulate DDI scenarios with clarithromycin, itraconazole and rifampicin. We demonstrate the applicability of scaling adult PBPK models to pediatrics for the prediction of individual plasma profiles. The novel PBPK models could be helpful to further investigate buprenorphine pharmacokinetics in various populations, particularly pediatric subgroups.

Pharmacokinetics and analgesic effects of intravenous, intramuscular or subcutaneous buprenorphine in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy: a randomized, prospective, masked, clinical trial

BackgroundBuprenorphine is used for canine postoperative pain management. This study aimed to describe the pharmacokinetics and evaluate the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine (Simbadol, 1.8 mg/mL) administered by different routes in dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Twenty-four dogs were included in a randomized, prospective, masked, clinical trial. Buprenorphine (0.02 mg/kg) was administered intravenously (IV), intramuscularly (IM) or subcutaneously (SC) (n = 8/group) 0.5 h before general anesthesia with propofol-isoflurane. Carprofen (4.4 mg/kg SC) was administered after anesthetic induction and before ovariohysterectomy. Pain was scored using the short-form Glasgow composite pain scale for dogs (SF-GCPS). Dogs were administered morphine (0.25 mg/kg IV) when SF-GCPS scores were ≥ 5/20. Blood sampling was performed up to 720 min after drug administration. Plasma buprenorphine and norbuprenorphine concentrations were analyzed using liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Pharmacokinetics of buprenorphine was described using a non-compartmental model (PK Solver 2.0). Statistical analysis was performed using linear mixed models and Fisher’s exact test (p < 0.05).ResultsPain scores were significantly higher than baseline after IV (0.5–2 h), IM (0.5–3 h) and SC (0.5–4 h) but not among groups. Prevalence of rescue analgesia was significantly higher in SC (7/8 dogs) than IV (2/8) but not different between IV and IM (3/8) or IM and SC. The frequency of rescue analgesia was not significantly different among groups (IV = 2, IM = 5 and SC = 9). Norbuprenorphine was not detected. For IV, IM and SC administration, clearance was 1.29, 1.65 and 1.40 L/hour/kg, volume of distribution was 6.8, 14.2 and 40.1 L/kg, the elimination half-life was 3.7, 5.7, 22 h, and the area under the plasma concentration-time curved extrapolated to infinity was 15.7, 12.4 and 16.4 ng/mL/hour, respectively. Bioavailability for IM and SC was 62.6 and 40%, respectively. Maximum plasma concentrations of buprenorphine were 6.2 and 1.3 ng/mL at 0.14 and 0.33 h after IM and SC administration, respectively.ConclusionsThe route of administration influences the analgesic efficacy of buprenorphine in dogs. SC administration of buprenorphine failed to provide clinical analgesia due to erratic drug absorption. At the doses administered, the IV and IM routes are preferred for postoperative analgesia.