Pharmacokinetics Of Bisoprolol Research Articles

Application of physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling to understand the impact of dissolution differences on in vivo performance of immediate release products: The case of bisoprolol.

Merck KGaA observed slight differences in the dissolution of Concor® (bisoprolol) batches over the years. The purpose of this work was to assess the impact of in vitro dissolution on the simulated pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol using in vitro–in vivo relationship established with available in vitro dissolution and corresponding plasma concentrations‐time data for several bisoprolol batches. A mechanistic absorption model/physiologically based pharmacokinetics model linked with a biopharmaceutics tool such as dissolution testing, namely, physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM), can be valuable in determining a dissolution “safe space.” A PBBM for bisoprolol was built using in vitro, in silico, and clinical data. We evaluated potential influences of variability in dissolution of bisoprolol batches on its clinical performance through PBBM and virtual bioequivalence (BE) trials. We demonstrated that in vitro dissolution was not critical for the clinical performance of bisoprolol over a wide range of tested values. Based on virtual BE trials, safe space expansion was explored using hypothetical dissolution data. A formulation with in vitro dissolution reaching 70% dissolved in 15 min and 79.5% in 30 min was shown to be BE to classical fast dissolution of bisoprolol (>85% within 15 min), as point estimates and 90% confidence intervals of the maximum plasma concentration and area under the concentration‐time curve were within the BE limits (0.8–1.25).

Population Pharmacokinetics of Bisoprolol in Hemodialysis Patients with Hypertension

The aim of our study was to estimate clearance of bisoprolol and reveal the factors that could influence its pharmacokinetic (PK) variability in hypertensive patients on hemodialysis, using the population PK analysis. Parameters associated with plasma concentration of bisoprolol at steady state were analyzed in 63 patients (mean age 62.12 years, mean total weight 69.63 kg) who were hypertensive and on hemodialysis due to severe renal failure using non-linear mixed-effect modeling with ADVAN1 subroutine. The final regression model for the clearance of the drug included only creatinine clearance (CLcr) out of 12 tested covariates. The equation that describes CL of bisoprolol is the following: CL (l/h) = 0.12 + 6.33 * CLcr. These findings suggest that the routine measuring of serum creatinine level may be used to facilitate administration of bisoprolol in patients on hemodialysis.

Variability of Bioavailability and Intestinal Absorption Characteristics of Bisoprolol

We previously reported that renal function is partly responsible for the interindividual variability of the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol. The aim of the present study was to examine the variability of bioavailability (F) of bisoprolol in routinely treated Japanese patients and intestinal absorption characteristics of the drug. We first analyzed the plasma concentration data of bisoprolol in 52 Japanese patients using a nonlinear mixed effects model. We also investigated the cellular uptake of bisoprolol using human intestinal epithelial LS180 cells. The oral clearance (CL/F) of bisoprolol in Japanese patients was positively correlated with the apparent volume of distribution (V/F), implying variable F. The uptake of bisoprolol in LS180 cells was temperature-dependent and saturable, and was significantly decreased in the presence of quinidine and diphenhydramine. In addition, the cellular uptake of bisoprolol dissolved in an acidic buffer was markedly less than that dissolved in a neutral buffer. These findings suggest that the rate/extent of the intestinal absorption of bisoprolol is another cause of the interindividual variability of the pharmacokinetics, and that the uptake of bisoprolol in intestinal epithelial cells is highly pH-dependent and also variable.

Population pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol in patients with chronic heart failure

The aim of the study was to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PK) model for clearance of bisoprolol in patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). Parameters associated with the plasma concentrations of bisoprolol at steady-state were analyzed in 61 patients (mean age 66.21 ± 9.49 years; mean total body weight 8.90 ± 12.26 kg) with CHF using non-linear mixed-effect modeling (NONMEM). A validation set of 17 patients with heart failure was used to estimate the predictive performance of the pharmacokinetic model. The typical mean value for bisoprolol clearance (CL), estimated by the base model (without covariates), in our population was 11.4 l h(-1). In the full model, covariates such as bisoprolol total daily dose (DD) and creatinine clearance were included. The final regression model for the clearance of bisoprolol was the following: CL (l h(-1)) = 4.68 + 0.859 * DD. The derived PK model describes the clearance of bisoprolol in patients with CHF, showing that the total daily dose of bisoprolol is the most important covariate. This finding will provide the basis for future PK studies on beta blockers in this specific patient population and lead to better overall management of heart failure.

Simulation of the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol in healthy adults and patients with impaired renal function using whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling

To develop and evaluate a whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (WB-PBPK) model of bisoprolol and to simulate its exposure and disposition in healthy adults and patients with renal function impairment. Bisoprolol dispositions in 14 tissue compartments were described by perfusion-limited compartments. Based the tissue composition equations and drug-specific properties such as log P, permeability, and plasma protein binding published in literatures, the absorption and whole-body distribution of bisoprolol was predicted using the 'Advanced Compartmental Absorption Transit' (ACAT) model and the whole-body disposition model, respectively. Renal and hepatic clearances were simulated using empirical scaling methods followed by incorporation into the WB-PBPK model. Model refinements were conducted after a comparison of the simulated concentration-time profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters with the observed data in healthy adults following intravenous and oral administration. Finally, the WB-PBPK model coupled with a Monte Carlo simulation was employed to predict the mean and variability of bisoprolol pharmacokinetics in virtual healthy subjects and patients. The simulated and observed data after both intravenous and oral dosing showed good agreement for all of the dose levels in the reported normal adult population groups. The predicted pharmacokinetic parameters (AUC, C(max), and T(max)) were reasonably consistent (<1.3-fold error) with the observed values after single oral administration of doses ranging from of 5 to 20 mg using the refined WB-PBPK model. The simulated plasma profiles after multiple oral administration of bisoprolol in healthy adults and patient with renal impairment matched well with the observed profiles. The WB-PBPK model successfully predicts the intravenous and oral pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol across multiple dose levels in diverse normal adult human populations and patients with renal insufficiency.

Pharmacokinetics of Bisoprolol and Its Effect on Dialysis Refractory Hypertension

The efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol were investigated following oral administration once daily for 12 weeks in hyperreninemic patients with dialysis-refractory hypertension. Mean blood pressure rapidly fell from 132 to 112 mmHg in the 5.0-mg/day (n = 6) and from 142 to 128 mmHg in the 2.5-mg/day patients (n = 5), which were accompanied by a fall in plasma renin activity. On nondialysis days, Cmax and T1/2 were significantly higher in patients than in healthy control subjects. However, Cmax in the 2.5-mg/day patients was almost equal to that in healthy control subjects receiving 5.0 mg/day of bisoprolol. Plasma bisoprolol was dialyzable. During the course of the study, dialysis hypotension and bradycardia occurred in two patients receiving 5.0 mg/day of bisoprolol. In conclusion, a daily dose of 2.5 mg bisoprolol seems to be an adequate and relatively effective dose in our patients with dialysis-refractory hypertension.

Stereoselective Pharmacokinetics of Bisoprolol After Intravenous and Oral Administration in Beagle Dogs

The stereoselective pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol, a highly β1-selective adrenoceptor blocking agent, was studied in dogs. After intravenous and oral administration of the racemate, there was a difference in the plasma concentration between S(−)- and R(+)-bisoprolol. The area under the curve (AUC) of concentration versus time of S(−)-bisoprolol was ∼1.5 times higher than that of R(+)-bisoprolol, and the elimination half–life of S(−)-bisoprolol was ∼1.4 times longer than that of R(+)-bisoprolol. However, no differences were observed in the volume of distribution, absolute bioavailability, and renal clearance between the two enantiomers. The plasma protein binding of S(−)-bisoprolol was also the same as that of the R(−)-isomer. No chiral inversion or enantiomer–enantiomer interaction was observed, when enantiomers were solely administered via the intravenous route. The comparison of the oxidative metabolic rate of two enantiomers using dog liver microsomes demonstrated that the metabolite was more slowly formed from S(−)- than from R(+)-bisoprolol. Consequently, we concluded that the stereoselective difference in the metabolic clearance between S(−)- and R(+)-bisoprolol caused the difference in the disposition of bisoprolol enantiomers.

Oral Pharmacokinetics of Bisoprolol in Resting and Exercising Healthy Volunteers

The effects of exercise on bisoprolol oral pharmacokinetics were studied in eight healthy male volunteers in an open, randomized, three-period, crossover trial. Oral bisoprolol (20 mg) was given either at rest during 24 h or with iterative stress tests before and 2.5, 5, 10, and 24 h after dosing. Exercise tests were repeated on a third placebo period. Bisoprolol was assayed in plasma and urines, and plasma catecholamines were measured before and after stress tests, Cmax, Tmax, elimination t1/2, and renal clearance of bisoprolol were not significantly modified by exercise. AUC0-infinity significantly decreased by 7.5% (p less than 0.05) with stress test resulting in an increase in apparent oral clearance. The beta-blocking effect peaked at 2.5 h, lasted greater than 24 h, and was related to plasma levels. The exercise-induced increase in plasma norepinephrine levels was significantly augmented with bisoprolol. These results suggest that repeated exercise tests exerted only limited effects on the oral pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol.

A randomized double-blind study of bisoprolol versus atenolol in mild to moderate essential hypertension

We have compared the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol, a new cardioselective beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, with atenolol in a randomized double-blind crossover study in 12 patients (mean age 53.5 y) with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After a two week placebo wash-out period without any antihypertensive therapy, the patients were given bisoprolol 10 mg daily or atenolol 50 mg daily, increasing to 20 mg or 100 mg respectively if the sitting diastolic blood pressure did not fall below 90 mm Hg after two weeks of therapy. Crossover occurred after six weeks of active therapy followed by two weeks of placebo wash-out. After 6 weeks of therapy both drugs significantly reduced sitting and standing diastolic blood pressures (bisoprolol by 15% and 16% respectively, atenolol by 11% in both cases). However, while sitting and standing systolic pressures were significantly reduced by bisoprolol (13% and 16% respectively), only standing systolic pressures were significantly reduced by atenolol (11%), and this reduction was significantly less than with bisoprolol (p less than 0.05). Both drugs similarly reduced mean sitting and standing heart rates. There were no significant differences between the single-dose and steady-state kinetics of either bisoprolol or atenolol. The mean plasma elimination half-life (t1/2) increased from 12.9 to 13.2 h during steady state on bisoprolol and from 7.2 to 11.5 h on atenolol. The apparent volume of distribution (Vz) was greater for bisoprolol than for atenolol after single dosing (235 1 vs 146 1) and at steady state (216 1 vs 137 1), but clearances were similar for both drugs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The single dose pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol (10 mg) in renal insufficiency: the clinical significance of balanced clearance.

The pharmacokinetics of the beta-blocking agents presently available render some subject to accumulation in renal or hepatic failure. Bisoprolol is one of the beta blockers possessing balanced clearance (both renal and hepatic clearance) which prevents such accumulation even in the case of complete failure of kidneys or liver. The single dose pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol were studied in patients with varying degrees of renal impairment and in healthy controls. Correlations were demonstrated between creatinine clearance and elimination half-life, mean residence time, area under the curve, total clearance and maximum concentration in those with renal dysfunction. The elimination half-life increased by a factor of 1.96 in those with severe renal dysfunction. Because of its balanced clearance, it is unlikely that accumulation of bisoprolol would occur beyond a factor of 2 on dosing to a steady state. The 48 hour plasma levels in the patients on dialysis were similar to those of the patients with severe renal dysfunction. This suggest that accumulation is unlikely, even in end stage renal failure. Bisoprolol may be used safely in patients with renal dysfunction. No adjustment of dose is necessary for those with mild to moderate dysfunction, but in severe or end stage renal failure the dose should not exceed 10 mg once daily.

Single oral dose pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol 10 mg in liver disease.

The pharmacokinetic profile of an oral single dose of the new cardioselective beta-blocking agent, bisoprolol, was studied in patients with moderate and severe liver disease (Pugh group B and C, respectively) and normal subjects. In patients with liver disease a significant increase in the drug elimination half-life, mean residence time, area under the curve, and time to reach maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) was observed with a significant reduction in the oral clearance compared with the control population. There was significant positive correlation between the Pugh Score (an objective measurement of hepatic dysfunction) and the volume of distribution. The drug was well tolerated although a rise in blood urea and creatinine of over 50% was observed in 4 of 9 patients with severe liver disease. In conclusion, the delayed absorption in these patients results in lower plasma concentrations and indicates that dose adjustment is not necessary but it is recommended that the upper limit for the daily dose should be set at 10 mg; this also applies under chronic dosing of bisoprolol.

Pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol during repeated oral administration to healthy volunteers and patients with kidney or liver disease.

The pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol were investigated following oral administration of 10mg once daily for 7 days in 8 healthy subjects, in 14 patients with different degrees of renal impairment and in 18 patients with liver disease. In healthy subjects peak and trough steady-state concentrations of 52 micrograms/L and 11 micrograms/L, respectively, an elimination half-life of 10.0 hours and total body clearance of 14.2 L/h were observed. 5.21 mg/24 hours of unchanged bisoprolol were recovered following urinary excretion during the dosage interval. In 11 patients with renal impairment (mean CLCR = 28 +/- 5 ml/min/1.72m2) half-life was prolonged to 18.5 hours, and peak and trough concentrations were 74 and 32 micrograms/L, respectively. Correspondingly, urinary excretion decreased to 3.35 mg/24 hours and total body clearance to 7.8 L/h. In uraemic patients (CLCR less than 5 ml/min/1.73m2) the total clearance of bisoprolol was 5.0 L/h and the elimination half-life was 24.2 hours. In patients with liver cirrhosis half-life increased to 13.5 hours, steady-state peak and trough concentrations increased to 62 and 22 micrograms/L, respectively, and total body clearance decreased to 10.8 L/h. The present study indicates that in patients with impairment of kidney or liver function accumulation of bisoprolol above a factor of 2 did not occur. However, in the terminal stages of insufficiency of kidney or liver function bisoprolol dosage should not exceed 10mg.

Basic pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol, a new highly beta 1-selective adrenoceptor antagonist.

The basic pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol were investigated in three independent studies involving 23 healthy volunteers. After administering 20 mg of 14C-bisoprolol orally, mean elimination half-lives of 11 hours for the unchanged drug and 12 hours for total radioactivity were observed. The enteral absorption of bisoprolol was nearly complete. Fifty percent of the dose was eliminated renally as unchanged bisoprolol and the other 50% metabolically, with subsequent renal excretion of the metabolites. Less than 2% of the dose was recovered from the feces. Intraindividual comparison of the pharmacokinetic data measured after oral and intravenous administration of 10 mg bisoprolol to 12 subjects yielded an absolute bioavailability of 90%. Total and renal clearance were calculated as 15.6 L/hr and 9.6 L/hr, respectively. The volume of distribution was 226 L. Concomitant food intake did not influence the bioavailability of bisoprolol.

Interaction of bisoprolol with cimetidine and rifampicin.

In 6 healthy volunteers the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol under steady-state conditions was investigated over three consecutive phases: over 7 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol once daily per os, 7 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol once daily plus 400 mg of cimetidine t.i.d. and 14 days of 10 mg of bisoprolol and 600 mg of rifampicin once daily with adequate intervals free of medication. After therapy with bisoprolol alone peak plasma levels (Cssmax) of the beta-blocker were 55.5 +/- 6.4 ng/ml (means +/- SEM), area under the plasma level-time curve (AUC tau) was 597 +/- 70 ng/ml.h, total body clearance (CL) 15.8 +/- 1.8 l/h and elimination half-lives (t1/2 beta) 10.1 +/- 1.2 h. Cimetidine did not cause any significant changes in the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol. Co-administration of rifampicin resulted in a decrease in Cssmax (43.0 +/- 6.9 ng/ml), AUC tau (397 +/- 54 ng/ml X h) and t1/2 beta (6.2 +/- 0.4 h). Accordingly, total body clearance increased to 23.8 +/- 2.5 l/h (p less than 0.05). In conclusion bisoprolol showed a statistically significant but probably clinically not important interaction with the enzyme-inducing drug rifampicin, but not with the enzyme inhibitor cimetidine.

Balanced Pharmacokinetics and Metabolism of Bisoprolol

Bisoprolol exhibits a high absolute bioavailability (90%) because of its nearly complete absorption (greater than 90%) and small first-pass effect (10%). Bioavailability is independent of food intake. A long plasma-elimination half-life (10-11h) allows a once-a-day dose regimen. Because of the low plasma protein-binding (30%), kinetics are insensitive to protein-binding interactions. The balanced clearance (equieffective hepatic and renal clearance) renders the kinetics virtually insensitive to renal or hepatic insufficiency. Even in the case of complete failure of one clearance organ, the plasma elimination half-life of bisoprolol would only double. The metabolites that are inactive and do not accumulate are eliminated predominantly by the kidneys. There is no stereoselective metabolism. The metabolism of bisoprolol is insensitive to liver enzyme inhibition (cimetidine), and nearly insensitive to liver enzyme induction (rifampicin). The metabolism is independent of genetic oxidation-polymorphism (debrisoquine). The pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol are independent of the dose in the range from 2.5 to 100 mg. There is no age or sex dependency. Bisoprolol exhibits predictable pharmacokinetics with well-balanced properties leading to small intra- and interindividual variability of the plasma concentration time curves and pharmacokinetic parameters. Bisoprolol is the beta-blocker with LADME(liberation, absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination)-optimized pharmacokinetics. This is a prerequisite for therapeutic reliability.

Pharmacokinetics of Bisoprolol and Influence on Serum Thyroid Hormones in Hyperthyroid Patients

Nine hyperthyroid patients (FT4 greater than or equal to 20 ng/L; FT3 greater than or equal to 6 ng/L) were given 1 X 10 mg bisoprolol/day p.o. for a period of 7 days. Pharmacokinetic data were derived from measurements of plasma bisoprolol concentrations after the first dose and at steady state after 7 days treatment. The thyroid hormones FT4, FT3, and rT3 were determined in the serum before and after bisoprolol treatment. In addition, subjective and objective parameters of thyroid function were recorded during the course of the therapy. The maximum bisoprolol concentrations measured after the first dose and after 7 days were 54.3 +/- 2.1 and 70.3 +/- 3.8 ng/ml, respectively, the minimum concentrations being 9.6 +/- 1.0 ng/ml and 11.9 +/- 1.7 ng/ml, respectively. This yields an accumulation factor of 1.2. At steady state, the plasma elimination half-life of bisoprolol was 9.8 +/- 0.9 h. No significant changes in serum thyroid hormones were observed during bisoprolol treatment. There was, however, an improvement in the subjective and objective clinical symptoms of hyperthyroidism. In comparison with the findings in healthy volunteers, the pharmacokinetics of bisoprolol remained unaltered in mild to moderate hyperthyroid patients. After oral application of bisoprolol, only small variations in the plasma concentration were observed inter- and also intraindividually in the course of treatment. This finding reflects the high absolute bioavailability of bisoprolol.