Pharmacist-managed Anticoagulation Clinic Research Articles

Successful Anticoagulation With Warfarin After Switching From Rifampin to Rifabutin.

A case of a patient receiving warfarin for pulmonary embolism (PE) concomitantly with rifampin for treatment of active pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is presented. A successful clinical intervention whereby the patient achieved therapeutic anticoagulation after switching to an alternative rifamycin antibacterial, rifabutin, is described. The drug-drug interaction between warfarin and rifampin is well known and documented. However, to our knowledge, no case reports of the interaction between warfarin and rifabutin have been published, and literature describing this interaction is lacking. We describe the case of a 27-year-old African American female referred to a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic for treatment of PE with warfarin. The patient was also being treated for active tuberculosis with rifampin, isoniazid, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol. Warfarin was initiated and over the course of 1 month was continuously increased to a total weekly dose (TWD) of 140 mg without ever achieving the target international normalized ratio (INR) of 2 to 3. In an attempt to reach the target INR, rifampin was switched to rifabutin to minimize the drug-drug interaction with warfarin. Six days after this switch, the target INR was achieved with a lower warfarin TWD of 115 mg. Rifabutin interacts with warfarin to a lesser degree than rifampin and may be considered as an alternative in patients taking warfarin who require treatment with a rifamycin. For patients in whom therapeutic anticoagulation with warfarin has been difficult, the use of rifabutin may be considered in place of rifampin when the concomitant use of a rifamycin is required.

Drug-related problem characterization and the solved status associated factor analysis in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.

Drug-related problems (DRPs) in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic (AC) have not been extensively studied. We aimed to characterize the DRPs in a pharmacist-managed AC, identify the factors associated with the solved status of DRPs, and analyze the secondary outcomes, including the safety and efficacy of AC service. The patients receiving services at a pharmacist-managed AC in a medical center for the first time from March 2019 to August 2020 were reviewed retrospectively. The DRPs were retrieved from a self-developed Intelligent AC Service System and classified according to the Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe Foundation v9.0 classification system. Logistic regression models were performed to identify the potential factors associated with the solved status of DRPs. A total of 78 direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and 34 warfarin users were included. The major types of DRPs identified at the initial service were adverse drug events (ADEs) (68.4%) and untreated symptoms or indications (14.8%) in the DOAC group, and ADEs (51.6%) and suboptimal effect of drug treatment (38.7%) in the warfarin group. The rates of totally solved DRPs were 56.8% and 51.6% in the DOAC and warfarin groups, respectively. According to the multivariable analysis, receiving AC services 3 times or more in 180 days (OR 3.11, 95% CI 1.30–7.44) was associated with the totally solved status of DRPs in the DOAC group, but no relevant factor was identified in the warfarin group. The secondary outcomes showed that DOAC users demonstrated fewer thromboembolism events, major bleeding, and bleeding-related hospitalizations after AC services, whereas the warfarin users increased percentage time in therapeutic range (TTR% 55.0% vs. 74.6%, P = 0.006) after AC services. These findings may be utilized to develop DOAC and warfarin AC services.

The joint physician- and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic is aiming to improve warfarin management in outpatients with atrial fibrillation in China: A prospective observational study

Background: Anticoagulation clinic (AC) is aimed at improving anticoagulation control and outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). There is little published data on the benefits of providing an AC in China even if Asians have a higher risk of hemorrhage and stroke when taking warfarin. This study attempts to assess the impact of the AC on warfarin management in the Chinese population. Subjects and Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University and consecutively enrolled 42 AF patients from the joint physician-and pharmacist-managed AC from March 2017 to April 2018. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. Patients already on warfarin for at least 6 months before coming to the AC and unwilling to receive AF ablation or switch to non-Vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants were included. The anticoagulant activity of warfarin was monitored using the international normalized ratio (INR). The primary outcome of this study was INR control, which was defined by the time-in-therapeutic range (TTR). The TTR before and after visiting the AC was compared. Results: The mean age of the enrolled 42 patients was 68.3 ± 10.6 years and 25 (59.5%) were women. The mean CHA2DS2-VASc score and the mean HAS-BLED score were 3.43 ± 1.29 and 1.86 ± 0.80, respectively, in 28 (66.7%) patients with nonvalvular AF. The median follow-up time after visiting the AC was 298.5 days (interquartile range: 151.8–441.8 days). The TTR (% days) before and after visiting the AC was 44.1% ± 27.5% and 69.7% ± 23.3% (P < 0.001), respectively. Meanwhile, 6 (14.3%) and 25 (59.5%) patients had TTR (% days) >65% before and after visiting the AC (P = 0.001), respectively. Conclusions: TTR values were higher in AF patients taking warfarin after the AC. More patients reached satisfactory warfarin control after visiting the AC.

Impact of an extended International Normalized Ratio follow-up interval on healthcare use among veteran patients on stable warfarin doses.

To analyze the impact of a 12-week extended International Normalized Ratio (INR) follow-up interval on healthcare use. A prospective cohort study of the use of an extended INR follow-up interval of up to 12 weeks was conducted over 2 years in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. A detailed protocol was used to extend the INR follow-up interval to 5-6 weeks and then 7-8 weeks and 11-12 weeks. The number of planned and unplanned anticoagulation encounters, procedures requiring warfarin interruption, telephone triage phone calls, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations were collected. A post hoc subanalysis was also completed on participants who were scheduled for 4 consecutive 12-week intervals. Compared to baseline, at 12 months there was a mean decrease in planned anticoagulation encounters of 2.24 visits (p < 0.001) among 44 participants. From 12 to 24 months compared to baseline, there was a mean decrease in planned anticoagulation encounters of 3.13 visits (p < 0.001) and an increase of 0.54 unplanned anticoagulation encounters (p = 0.04) among 39 participants. The remainder of healthcare use variables were not statistically significantly different from baseline at any time point. Of the 15 participants scheduled for 4 consecutive 12-week intervals, there was a decrease from baseline of approximately 5 visits over the course of a year (p < 0.001). An extended INR follow-up interval appears to decrease anticoagulation healthcare use without an increase in acute healthcare use. While this intervention could be cost-effective, institutions need to consider safety, efficacy, and feasibility prior to implementation.

Impact of an electronic medium delivery of warfarin education in a low income, minority outpatient population: a pilot intervention study

BackgroundWarfarin is classified as a high-alert medication for ambulatory healthcare and safe guards for high-alert medications are necessary, including the practice of mandatory patient education. The high cost of hospitalizations related to adverse events combined with the average bleeding event rate of 7–8% in spite of routine patient education, suggests the importance of new approaches to standardized health education on warfarin. We sought to evaluate the impact of a warfarin educational video using an electronic tablet on patient knowledge and to determine patients’ satisfaction with the use of an electronic tablet for educational purposes in outpatient clinics serving a low income, minority population.MethodsA warfarin educational video delivered on an electronic tablet (iPad) was delivered at two pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics to uninsured patients whose annual income is equal or less than two hundred percent below the poverty level were offered. Patients (n = 18) completed a pre-video and post-video knowledge test on warfarin before and after viewing the warfarin educational video on an electronic tablet and a follow-up test to measure the retention of knowledge and a patient satisfaction survey at 60 days. The primary outcome was change in knowledge test scores. Other outcome measures included adherence rates, adverse events, time in therapeutic INR range, and patient-reported satisfaction scores.ResultsThe majority of patients were uninsured men taking warfarin for atrial fibrillation (n = 5). The median scores at post-video knowledge test and follow-up knowledge test were significantly higher than that for the pre-knowledge test (12 (11–12) vs. 10(8–11), p < 0.001). The study group had a ‘time in therapeutic INR’ range of 56.3%, a rate of adverse events of 24.5%, and a self-reported adherence rate to warfarin of 94.1%. The majority of patients also had positive responses to the patient satisfaction survey.ConclusionsPatient education delivered via iPad to facilitate knowledge of medication can serve as a useful tool for educating patients about warfarin and warfarin therapy. Use of an electronic medium may be a unique way to provide standard medication education to patients.Trial registrationThe study was retrospectively registered with: NCT03650777; 9/18/18.

Evaluation of the potential impact of pharmacy technician performance of anticoagulation clinic tasks on operational efficiency.

Results of a study to determine the proportion of anticoagulation clinic workload that could be performed by clinical pharmacy technicians (CPTs) and the potential impact on operational efficiency of pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics (ACCs) are reported. In a quality improvement project involving 11 Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers, investigators conducted a 3-day time study in pharmacist-managed ACCs followed by scoring of task appropriateness for CPTs via the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method by the VA Anticoagulation Subject Matter Expert (SME) Workgroup. The primary outcome was the percentage of tasks deemed appropriate for a CPT to perform. The Anticoagulation SME Workgroup determined that a wide variety of mainly administrative ACC tasks could be completed by a CPT. At the 11 VA ACCs, an average of 53.4% (range, 39.9-76.1%) of tasks being performed by pharmacists were deemed appropriate for CPTs. The average percentage of total clinic time associated with performing tasks appropriate for a CPT equated to an estimated 1,111 hours per year. Shifting that portion of the annual work hours to a CPT could potentially result in cost avoidance of $55,302. At the ACCs evaluated, a significant proportion of tasks (53.4% on average) may be appropriate to assign to CPTs to improve the operational efficiency of these clinics. This finding supports development of business plans for the addition of CPTs in ACCs along with elements to inform crafting of an effective template for ACC structure, including clearly defined CPT roles.

Preemptive Dose Adjustment Effect on the Quality of Anticoagulation Management in Warfarin Patients With Drug Interactions: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

One strategy to manage patients on warfarin starting an interacting drug is to increase the frequency of monitoring. Another strategy is to adjust warfarin dose around the time patient is started on an interacting medication, which is known as “preemptive warfarin dose adjustment.” The main objective of this study is to compare preemptive to nonpreemptive strategy and their impact on the quality of anticoagulation management. This is a retrospective cohort study performed at the pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in a tertiary hospital in the State of Qatar. Over a 4-year period, 340 patients were evaluated, and 58 warfarin–drug interaction encounters were identified. Mean age of the patients was (57.7 ± 13.7), and 50% of them were females. Preemptive dose adjustment was used in 17 (29.3%) cases. Incidence of out-of-target international normalized ratio (INR) was statistically lower in the preemptive arm compared to the control group (41.2% [7/17] vs 69.2% [27/39], P = .048). Incidence of extreme out-of-target INR was numerically lower in the preemptive arm compared to the control but did not reach statistical significance (11.8% [2/17] vs 29.3% [12/41], P = .139). Change in frequency of INR monitoring was not different between the 2 groups. However, overall frequency of INR monitoring after onset/discontinuation of interacting medication increased compared to baseline (7 [9] vs 21 [16] days, P < .001). Preemptive strategy was shown in our study to decrease incidence of the out-of-target INR visits, although patients remained in need for close monitoring.

Outcomes of systematic anticoagulation management in pharmacist and nurse specialized clinics

BackgroundWhile systematic anticoagulation management leads to improved outcomes, there is limited data comparing outcomes in anticoagulation clinics managed by pharmacists vs nurses. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of pharmacist vs nurse‐managed clinics on the quality of anticoagulation and warfarin‐related hospitalizations and emergency department (ED) admissions.MethodsA retrospective observational cohort study of patients treated with warfarin and referred to a pharmacist‐managed anticoagulation clinic (PMAC) or a nurse‐managed anticoagulation clinic (NMAC) was conducted at the University of Illinois Hospital and Health Sciences System. The primary outcome was the proportion of international normalized ratio levels in therapeutic range (PIR). The secondary outcome was warfarin‐related hospitalizations and ED visits. Multivariate regression models were used to evaluate the effect of the model of care (PMAC vs NMAC) on PIR and hospitalization/ED visits, respectively. An economic evaluation of adverse events was also undertaken.ResultsA total of 200 consecutive patients (100 patients in the PMAC group and 100 patients in the NMAC group) were included. The majority of patients were females (58.5%) and average age was 61.4 ± 14.6 years. Patients in the PMAC group were more nonadherent to warfarin therapy and had more than three missed clinic appointments compared with the NMAC group ([19.1% ± 10.1% vs 4.1% ± 4.1%, P &lt; 0.05]; and [78% vs 33%, P &lt; 0.05]) respectively. The average PIR was 51.8% ± 15.9% and 56.2% ± 13.9% (P = 0.04) in the PMAC and NMAC groups, respectively. After controlling for confounders, the adjusted PIR was not different between the two groups. The NMAC group, however, had over seven times greater odds of hospitalization/ED visits compared to the PMAC group. The PMAC saved $505 349 over a 1.25 year period.ConclusionThe quality of warfarin anticoagulation did not differ between pharmacist and nurse‐managed models of anticoagulation care, however, PMACs decreased the odds of warfarin‐related hospitalizations/ED visits and their associated costs.

Institution-based, Pharmacist-managed Anticoagulation in Patients with a Left Ventricular Assist Device

Long-term anticoagulation with warfarin is required for patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). There is limited data of time in therapeutic range (TTR) in the LVAD population, with reports of 31% to 52%. We sought to evaluate the TTR for an institution-based, pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in the LVAD population.

Interventions and Strategies to Improve Oral Anticoagulant Use in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review of Systematic Reviews.

Anticoagulation therapy is the fundamental approach for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Numerous systematic reviews comparing anticoagulation strategies have been published. We aim to summarize the efficacy and safety evidence of these strategies in AF patients from previously published systematic reviews. We searched PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane library from inception to Feb 24th, 2017, to identify systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials that assessed interventions or strategies to improve oral anticoagulant use in AF patients. Thirty-four systematic reviews were eligible for inclusion but only 11 were included in the qualitative analyses, corresponding to 40 unique meta-analyses, as the remaining systematic reviews had overlapping primary studies. There was insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of genotype-guided dosing and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics for stroke prevention in AF patients. Conversely, patient's self-management and novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), in general were superior to warfarin for preventing stroke and reducing mortality. All interventions showed comparable risk of major bleeding with warfarin. Findings from this overview support the superiority of NOACs and patient's self-management for preventing stroke in AF patients. However, uncertainties remain on the benefits of genotype-guided dosing and pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics due to poor quality evidence, and future research is warranted.

Assessment of oral anticoagulation control at two pharmacist-managed clinics in Brazil.

Background Warfarin remains widely used by patients with cardiovascular diseases. When using warfarin, the quality of oral anticoagulation control is a critical determinant to minimize the risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events. Pharmacist engagement in patient care is relevant towards improving the quality of warfarin therapy. Objective To assess the quality of oral anticoagulation control measured by time in therapeutic range (TTR) at two pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics (AC). Method This study included adults with indication of continuous warfarin use. Patients were recruited at two AC of public hospitals in Brazil (2014-2015). Anticoagulation control was assessed by TTR using the Rosendaal method. Laboratory INR values were collected for the maximum period of follow-up (2009-2015). Results A total of 554 patients were studied. The median age was 63.7 [Quartile 1 (Q1) 54.3; Quartile 3 (Q3) 73.6] years, 57.4% female. The median TTR was 64.3% [Q1 54.0%; Q3 74.0%], and 344 (61.6%) patients had TTR≥60%. Conclusion Pharmacist-managed AC have achieved an adequate TTR in Brazilian patients with low socioeconomic status. Interventions include face-to-face appointments for individual patient education, warfarin-dosing adjustments and monitoring of drug interactions. Pharmacists are important to improve adherence and the quality of warfarin therapy in low- and middle income countries.

Modelling the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-managed anticoagulation service for older adults with atrial fibrillation in Singapore

Background Oral anticoagulation with warfarin is the cornerstone therapy in atrial fibrillation (AF) for stroke prevention. Multi-disciplinary anticoagulation management services have been shown to be cost-effective in the United States, Hong Kong and Thailand, but the findings are not readily generalizable to Singapore's healthcare system. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic (ACC) compared with usual care (UC) for the management of older adults with AF receiving oral anticoagulation with warfarin. Setting Pharmacist-managed ACC in an academic medical centre. Method A Markov model with 3-month cycle length and 30-year time horizon compared costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of ACC and UC from the patient's and healthcare provider's perspectives. Four pathways based on time in therapeutic range (TTR) were: ACC TTR<70%, ACC TTR≥70%, UC TTR<70% and UC TTR≥70%. A hypothetical cohort of 70-year-old Singaporean AF patients receiving warfarin was utilised. Local data from national disease registries, patient surveys and hospital databases were used. When local data was not available, published studies on Asian populations were utilized when available. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to account for uncertainties. Costs and QALYs were discounted annually by 3%. Main outcome measure Costs and QALYs of ACC and UC. Results Pharmacist-managed ACC was found to dominate UC in all comparisons. It improved effectiveness by 0.19 and 0.13 QALYs at TTR<70% and TTR≥70% respectively compared with UC. From the patient's perspective, ACC reduced costs by SG$1222.67 (€1110.24) for TTR<70% and SG$1008.16 (€915.46) for TTR≥70%. Similar trends were observed from the healthcare provider's perspective, with ACC reducing costs by SG$1444.79 (€1311.94) for TTR<70% and SG$1269.17 (€1152.46) for TTR≥70% compared with UC. The results were robust to variations of the parameters over their plausible ranges in one-way sensitivity analyses. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses demonstrated that ACC was cost-effective more than 79% of the time from both perspectives at a willingness-to-pay threshold of SG$69,050 (€62,701) per QALY. Conclusion Pharmacist-managed ACC is more effective and less costly compared with UC regardless of the quality of anticoagulation therapy. The findings support the current body of evidence demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of ACC.

Interventions unrelated to anticoagulation in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic.

Results of a study to determine the number of interventions unrelated to anticoagulation made in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic are presented. A retrospective, single-center cohort was conducted in a hospital-affiliated outpatient pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. Patients were ≥18 years old and attended at least one face-to-face appointment between January 1, 2012, and November 30, 2013. The primary outcome was the number of interventions made outside of an anticoagulation clinic's primary purpose. Interventions were classified based on predetermined criteria. Results of selected interventions were determined along with the association between patient factors and having an intervention. Descriptive statistics and relative risk were used, when appropriate. A total of 268 patients were included, and 5846 pharmacist encounters were reviewed. Investigators identified 2222 interventions. Patients having >10 medications were 17% more likely to have an intervention compared with those having <5 medications. Patients attending at least two primary care visits within one year prior to their first appointment with a pharmacist were 12% more likely to have an intervention compared with those attending fewer than two appointments. Pharmacists in an anticoagulation clinic made a substantial number of interventions unrelated to anticoagulation therapy, with most clinic patients having at least one such intervention made on their behalf. The majority of these interventions were related to medication reconciliation. The total number of medications being taken and the number of physician visits were significantly associated with an intervention taking place.

The first pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic under a collaborative practice agreement in Qatar: clinical and patient-oriented outcomes.

Optimal outpatient anticoagulation management requires a systematic and coordinated approach. Extensive evidence regarding the benefits of pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services has been reported in the literature. The quality and outcomes associated with pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics under collaborative practice agreements in the Middle East have rarely been reported. The first pharmacist-managed ambulatory anticoagulation clinic in Qatar was launched at Al-Wakrah Hospital in March 2013. The objectives of this study were to: (i) describe the practice model of the clinic, (ii) evaluate the quality of the clinic [i.e. the time in therapeutic range (TTR)] and the clinical outcomes (i.e. the efficacy and safety), and (iii) determine the patients' satisfaction and overall quality of life (QoL). Clinical outcome data were collected through a retrospective chart review of all patients managed from March 2013 to October 2014 at the pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. Furthermore, the patient-oriented outcomes data were prospectively collected using the 24-item Duke Anticoagulation Satisfaction Scale (DASS). Each item was assessed using a 7-point Likert-type scale on which lower scores indicated better QoL and greater satisfaction. The clinical outcome data analyses included 119 patients who were enrolled at the clinic during the 19-month study period. The mean number of international normalized ratio (INR) tests/month was 65 ± 9, the average testing frequency was 2·7 ± 1·6 weeks, and the average %TTR was 76·8 ± 22·9%. There was one major bleeding event (0·67%/year), 12 minor bleeding events (8%/year) and two thromboembolic events (1·35%/year) recorded during the study period. Of the 119 patients, 50 participated in the satisfaction and QoL survey. The median (IQR) total QoL score of these subjects was 63 (48) (minimum-maximum achievable score: 24-168). Seventy-six per cent of the patients indicated 'a lot to very much' in terms of their overall satisfaction with the anticoagulation treatment. The participants who were naïve to anticoagulation treatment reported a significantly greater satisfaction and better QoL than the experienced patients [58 (44) vs. 82 (59); P = 0·009]. These findings provide early evidence that the patients who were managed at a pharmacy-based anticoagulation clinic in an evolving healthcare system experienced optimal anticoagulation management.

Potential liability in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic

A pharmacists accept responsibility for patient care activities such as anticoagulation clinics, it is inevitable that there will be lawsuits alleging negligence by pharmacists in the performance of related activities. A federal court in Michigan recently reviewed the adequacy of one such lawsuit. Because the pharmacists were employed at a Veterans Administration Medical Center, the defendant in the lawsuit was the United States.

Evaluation of pharmacist-based compared to doctor-based anticoagulation management in Qatar.

For over 60 years, warfarin has been the mainstay anticoagulant used in the outpatient setting for the prevention and treatment of a wide variety of thromboembolic clinical conditions. Guidelines recommend that health care providers managing oral anticoagulation therapy should do so in a systematic and coordinated fashion. Studies have shown that, when compared to traditional doctor-based anticoagulation management, pharmacist-managed anticoagulation services can improve patient outcomes. The first pharmacist-based anticoagulation clinic in Qatar was launched in 2013 at Alwakra Hospital. The primary objective of this research was to evaluate the impact of pharmacist versus doctor-based anticoagulation management on the percentage time under therapeutic INR (International Normalized Ratio; TTR), INR within therapeutic range and the extreme out of range INRs. A retrospective cohort study was designed to compare the anticoagulation control of pharmacist-based warfarin clinic to the usual doctor-care. Data from 278 patients taking warfarin (78 managed at pharmacist and 200 at doctor-based clinic) were evaluated. Subjects followed at the pharmacist-based clinic had a superior TTR compared to those managed at the doctor-based clinic (81.8% vs. 69.8%, P < 0.001). Additionally, the percentage of visits within therapeutic range were significantly higher in the pharmacist's group compared to doctor's group (76.5% vs. 71.2%, P = 0.011). At the same time, percentage of visits with extreme subtherapeutic INR was reduced in the pharmacist-managed clinic (5.17% vs. 7.05%, P = 0.007) CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicates that pharmacist-based anticoagulation has better INR control when compared to the traditional anticoagulation management. Pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics should be considered and supported for warfarin management.

Impact of Point-of-Care Implementation in Pharmacist-Run Anticoagulation Clinics Within a Community-Owned Health System: A Two-Year Retrospective Analysis.

Point-of-care (POC) testing devices allow laboratory monitoring to be performed in various settings and accessed immediately. To evaluate the outcomes of monitoring anticoagulation patients in pharmacistmanaged, multicenter clinics utilizing i-STAT POC machines. This study was a retrospective, multicenter chart review of 150 patients before and after implementation of the POC intervention for anticoagulation monitoring. Data collected included international normalized ratio (INR) results, indication for warfarin, minor and major bleeds, thromboembolic events, emergency room (ER) visits, and hospitalizations before and after i-STAT POC implementation. The time in therapeutic INR range (TTR) was significantly higher after i-STAT POC implementation than before implementation (60.4% ± 21.2% and 52.5% ± 21.5%, respectively; P = .0001). There were no reports of major bleeding during the study period. Twenty-three minor bleeds were reported after i-STAT POC implementation compared to 19 events before implementation (P < .0001). One thromboembolic event was reported after i-STAT POC implementation. There was a significant difference in the number of hospitalizations before i-STAT POC implementation as opposed to after implementation (2 and 0, respectively; P < .0001). There was also a significant increase in ER visits after i-STAT POC implementation (P < .0001). The results of the study indicate improvement in TTR in pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinics by 7.8%. Although the use of the i-STAT POC machine detected an increase in minor bleeds, thromboembolic events, and ER visits, there was a decrease in hospitalization. The outcomes of this multicenter study indicate that implementation on this scale provides improvement in regard to safety and cost.

PIH63 - Implementation of An Ambulatory Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Clinic In Qatar: Development of A New Service and A Pilot On Patients' Satisfaction and Quality of Life

PIH63 - Implementation of An Ambulatory Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Clinic In Qatar: Development of A New Service and A Pilot On Patients' Satisfaction and Quality of Life

Implementation of Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Clinic in a Saudi Arabian Health Center

During the past 2 decades, a paradigm shift in the management of oral anticoagulation therapy has occurred. A multidisciplinary approach has been used and has proved beneficial from both a cost and quality perspective. However, this approach to anticoagulation therapy is not well established in Saudi Arabia and the Middle East, and the traditional way of managing anticoagulation patients is still the mainstay of care. The Pharmacy Services Division (PSD) in collaboration with physician, nursing, and medical support enterprises at the Dhahran Health Center established the pharmacy-managed anticoagulation clinic (ACC). To describe the implementation process of the first pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia and its impact on patient care. The PSD in collaboration with medical staff successfully created a care delivery model utilizing clinical pharmacists' expertise to provide comprehensive anticoagulation management services at Saudi Aramco Medical Services Organization (SAMSO). Planning included analyzing existing practices, reviewing the relevant literature, obtaining physician input, formulating a business proposal, and developing clinical protocols and guidelines. Collaborative relationships were established with the center laboratory, scheduling services, and nursing and medical departments. Clinic services include patient assessment, anticoagulation monitoring, warfarin dosage adjustment, medication dispensing at the clinic, patient education, and feedback to referring physicians. Data (2 years before and after clinic inception) for all patients enrolled at the anticoagulation clinic were reviewed to evaluate the impact of the clinic on anticoagulation management, adverse events, and patient satisfaction. A total of 578 patients were enrolled in the ACC. The total percentage of international normalized ratio (INR) within the target range was 59% versus 48% when compared to the previous traditional practice. The number of INR tests per patient dropped by 19%. Minor and major adverse events occurred in 10% and 1.5% of patients, respectively. Overall, the patients were very satisfied with the new clinic compared to the previous practice. Implementation of the pharmacist-managed ACC in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia had a positive impact on patient care based on the improvements in the number of patients whose INR was within therapeutic range and patient satisfaction scores.

Effects of Depressive and Other Psychiatric Disorders on Anticoagulation Control in a Pharmacist-Managed Anticoagulation Clinic

The impact of psychiatric disorders on International Normalized Ratio (INR) control and adverse events for patients receiving warfarin has not been fully elucidated. To determine the effect of depressive and other psychiatric disorders on anticoagulation control in a pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic. A retrospective chart review evaluated outcomes of patients with no history of psychiatric disorders and compare it with that of patients with either a history of depression or any form of psychiatric disorder. Data was obtained from patient medical records over a 24-month period. The primary outcome was a comparison of time in therapeutic range, calculated using 3 separate methods (percentage of INRs in therapeutic range, a modified Rosendaal's linear interpolation, and mean INR in goal). A total of 151 patients met the inclusion criteria (control = 79, psychiatric disorders = 72 patients). Control patients had a significantly greater proportion of INRs in the goal range compared with either the depression or psychiatric disorders groups (control, 55.7%; depression, 43.5%; psychiatric, 45.8%). Utilizing the Rosendaal's method, patients with psychiatric disorders were in the goal range significantly less often than those in the control group (53.0% vs 61.3%). No differences were seen when adjusting for multiple comparisons or when comparing the control and depression groups (54.5% vs 61.3%). There was no difference between the groups when comparing percentages of patients with a mean INR in their goal range. Patients with psychiatric disorders who take warfarin may spend less time in the therapeutic range.